Arny Krueger wrote:
>"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>
>>>> Arny said:
>>>
>>>>> "Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> And above, we have yet the latest example of Krueger's delusional
>>>>>> fantasies about sockpuppets. He, of course, repeats this lie
>>>>>> frequently without any proof to support his lies.
>>>
>>>>> OK Bruce, where is your proof for this claim that you made:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>http://www.google.com/groups?selm=19990621191534.07640.00002483%40ng-ck1.aol
>>>>> .com
>>>
>>>>> "It is worth noting that Kruger has now adopted this despicable
>>>>> tactic (i.e. questioning the validity of another's identity and
>>>>> credentials) - solely as a diversionary tactic to try and disguise
>>>>> the attack that he elected to start a series of personal attacks
>>>>> against me gratuitously. Of
>>> course, his sockpuppet henchman, >> Haugen, paved the way for him."
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce Richman, I challenge you to post your indisputable proof that
>>>>> Haugen was actually my sockpuppet.
>>>>
>>>> He's not saying that Doug Haugen was YOUR sockpuppet.
>>>
>>> What's unclear about "...his sockpuppet..."?
>>>
>>>> He's saying that Doug was your henchman AND a sockpuppet.
>>>
>>> That's not what he said. I reproduced it above, in context.
>>>
>>> What's unclear about "...his sockpuppet..."?
>>>
>>> If this were an isolated event..
>>>
>>> What about this post:
>>>
>>>
>http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030429144037.16013.00000188%40mb-m25.aol
>>> .com
>>>
>>> "The above paragraph should be enteitled "How To Put A Negative Spin
>>> on Damaging
>>> and Relevant Information" - by Arny "the sockpuppet and pathological
>>> liar" Krueger. "
>>>
>>> Here Richman claims that I'm a sockpuppet. This should amuse you
>>> Philips, given that you've bragged about stalking me in my house. So
>>> Phillips you stalk sockpuppets in their imaginary houses? LOL!
>>>
>>>> That, it and of itself, is easy to prove.
>>>
>>> What about this posts that claims that "tor b" is one of my
>>> sockpuppets:
>>>
>>>
>http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030427094021.24220.00000129%40mb-m27.aol
>>> .com
>>>
>>> <please notice the post's title>
>>>
>>>
>>> Then there is always:
>>>
>>>
>http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030427225737.02646.00000336%40mb-m13.aol
>>> .com
>>>
>>> "Sockpuppet and liar Krueger, your inability to tell the truth is
>>> once again in
>>> evidence."
>>>
>>> ...and there are many more examples in google of Richman's
>>> delusional claims about me and sockpuppets.
>>>
>>>> Learn to read, pervert.
>>>
>>> Yes, you should learn to read Phillips, and yes you are a pervert
>>> as you've demonstrated here many times.
>
>
>> All of the above represents just another pathetic attempt by Krueger
>> to avoid responsibility for making yet another set of pathological,
>> delusional lies.
>
>
>Wrong. The pathological delusional lies are clearly identified as to their
>source - BJ Richman.
>
What the pathological liar, Krueger, again tries to avoid - is taking
responsibility for personally attacking a joke that I posted that had no
reference to him. The URL has already been provided in a previous post and is
a matter of Google record.
>> It is, of course, obvious that on the subject of
>> why he chose to attack me for posting a joke - without provocation -
>> this coward has nothing to say.
>
>Notice that BJ Richman tries to pass his hypocritical behavior as a joke.
>
It's obvious that the hatemonger,l Krueger, can't comprehend written English.
The joke posted was deliberately distorted via selective editing by the
delusional liar, Krueger, as is his custom. He then proceded to level an
unprovoked personal attack - as is his custom. Regular readers of RAO have
seen his deliberate quoting of partial posts out of context on numerous
occasions.
Typically, when this lying creep gives URLs, he selects one or 2 sentences of
another poster to try and misrepresent what the other poster said. Of course,
when people read what the poster Krueger attacks *actually* said, Krueger's
basic dishonesty is easily exposed.
>> How typical that Krueger would
>> simply try and change the subject as a diversionary tactic rather
>> than admit that he made yet another unprovoked attack on a post which
>> had nothing to do with him.
>
>Notice that Richman wants you to believe that a post titled "Re: Graphic
>Krueger joke!" has nothing to do with me.
>
>LOL!
>
>
>
False laughter from this arrogant hatemonger duly noted. Of course, the post
in which I refer was the one with the following message ID:
Message-id: >
As the liar, Krueger, tries to avoid mentioning, it was entitled "For Those
That Are Tired of Debating Foreign Policy - .........." Of course, nothing in
the title has any reference to the pathological liar, Krueger, at all. Of
course, Krueger simply tries to pretend this post doesn't exist and divert
attention to another post with a different title - just another of his usual
diversionary tactics to avoid taking responsibility for an unprovoked personal
attack.
Kruger then proceeded to deliberately quote out of context only the last line
of the joke which I posted and then leveled an provoked personal attack, as
identified in Message ID #:
Message-id: >
"Richman, are you a class act or what?"
Above is a direct quote from the liar, Krueger, who, as the above referenced,
Message Id clearly indicates, chose to attack the Iast line of a joke - after
delilberately deleting 99% of its content .
This, of course, represents typical Krueger behavior toward one the many
"enemies" that his paranoid and delusional set of conspiracy theories has
driven him to commit over a seven year period on RAO. This week, he added
"Schizoid Man" to his enemies list. Who will it be next week?
LOL!
Bruce J. Richman