mp3 quality

[Genisyde]

which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and 320kbps)
because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the best qulaities. Does
anyone know which is the best????

[Eberhard Sengpiel]

Genisyde > Wrote:
> which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and
> 320kbps) because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the
> best qulaities. Does anyone know which is the best?


Read here:
http://www.nut-n-but.net/CCPCUG/TechBrief%20Articles/TB0105.html
http://www.hitsquad.com/smm/programs/SoundApp/wwwboard/messages/611.html
http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/mp3encoder/2002-August/005041.html
http://episteme.arstechnica.com/6/ubb.x?q=Y&a=tpc&s=50009562&f=67909965&m=2160954422

Cheers

Eberhard Sengpiel

[ReEfErMaDnEsS]

192 is considered by most to be CD quality, however the ripper and the
encoder is the true measure of quality......if space isn't a big deal and
quality is checkout EAC ripper and LAME as the encoder at at least 256.


"Genisyde" > wrote in message
om...
> which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and 320kbps)
> because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the best qulaities. Does
> anyone know which is the best????

[Codifus]

ReEfErMaDnEsS wrote:
> 192 is considered by most to be CD quality, however the ripper and the
> encoder is the true measure of quality......if space isn't a big deal and
> quality is checkout EAC ripper and LAME as the encoder at at least 256.
>
>
> "Genisyde" > wrote in message
> om...
>
>>which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and 320kbps)
>>because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the best qulaities. Does
>>anyone know which is the best????
>
>
>
Ummm, no way is 192 considered to be anywhere near CD quality. 192 is
just the most acceptable trade-off between quality and space
conservation. 320 approaches CD quality much better.

CD

[ReEfErMaDnEsS]

I said considered by most....sort of the popular sentiment in the last few
years regarding MP3.....not my belief and certainly not yours

"Codifus" > wrote in message
et...
> ReEfErMaDnEsS wrote:
> > 192 is considered by most to be CD quality, however the ripper and the
> > encoder is the true measure of quality......if space isn't a big deal
and
> > quality is checkout EAC ripper and LAME as the encoder at at least 256.
> >
> >
> > "Genisyde" > wrote in message
> > om...
> >
> >>which mp3 quality is the best (out of 128, 192, 256, and 320kbps)
> >>because i've heard that 320 and 128 arent the best qulaities. Does
> >>anyone know which is the best????
> >
> >
> >
> Ummm, no way is 192 considered to be anywhere near CD quality. 192 is
> just the most acceptable trade-off between quality and space
> conservation. 320 approaches CD quality much better.
>
> CD