RFC: Krooger vs. Howard; which has less intellect?

[Robert Morein]

Having seen their recent cartoonish declarations about level matching for
speaker comparisons, I'm curious of their relative ranking with respect to:

1. IQ
2. cunning
3. honesty

It may be useful in this comparison to match their loudness levels to within
one tenth of a lie.

Opinions?

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

> Having seen their recent cartoonish declarations about level matching for
> speaker comparisons, I'm curious of their relative ranking with respect to:
>
> 1. IQ
> 2. cunning
> 3. honesty
>
> It may be useful in this comparison to match their loudness levels to within
> one tenth of a lie.
>
> Opinions?


What does "RFC" stand for? "Robert's Fried Chicken"?

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
> > Having seen their recent cartoonish declarations about level matching
for
> > speaker comparisons, I'm curious of their relative ranking with respect
to:
> >
> > 1. IQ
> > 2. cunning
> > 3. honesty
> >
> > It may be useful in this comparison to match their loudness levels to
within
> > one tenth of a lie.
> >
> > Opinions?
>
>
> What does "RFC" stand for? "Robert's Fried Chicken"?
>
Request for cruelty.
Input for a FAQ.

[Arny Krueger]

George M. Middius wrote:
> Robert Morein said:
>
>> Having seen their recent cartoonish declarations about level
>> matching for speaker comparisons, I'm curious of their relative
>> ranking with respect to:
>>
>> 1. IQ
>> 2. cunning
>> 3. honesty
>>
>> It may be useful in this comparison to match their loudness levels
>> to within one tenth of a lie.
>>
>> Opinions?
>
>
> What does "RFC" stand for? "Robert's Fried Chicken"?

Request For Co-Dependency.

[George M. Middius]

Robert Morein said:

>>> Having seen their recent cartoonish declarations about level
>>> matching for speaker comparisons, I'm curious of their relative
>>> ranking with respect to:

>>> 1. IQ
>>> 2. cunning
>>> 3. honesty

>>> It may be useful in this comparison to match their loudness levels
>>> to within one tenth of a lie.

>>> Opinions?


>> What does "RFC" stand for? "Robert's Fried Chicken"?

> Request for cruelty. Input for a FAQ.

Cruelty is encouraging those two dunderheads to go on living.....

In my opinion, they're both above average in IQ, Krooger is more cunning,
and Ferstler is less compulsively dishonest (i.e. he chooses his moments
to attempt deceptions, whereas Krooger lies reflexively).

But getting to the heart of the matter, try ranking Krooger and Fester on
their more dominant traits:

A. sense of honor
B. paranoia
C. hypocrisy

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Robert Morein said:
>
> >>> Having seen their recent cartoonish declarations about level
> >>> matching for speaker comparisons, I'm curious of their relative
> >>> ranking with respect to:
>
> >>> 1. IQ
> >>> 2. cunning
> >>> 3. honesty
>
> >>> It may be useful in this comparison to match their loudness levels
> >>> to within one tenth of a lie.
>
> >>> Opinions?
>
>
> >> What does "RFC" stand for? "Robert's Fried Chicken"?
>
> > Request for cruelty. Input for a FAQ.
>
> Cruelty is encouraging those two dunderheads to go on living.....
>
> In my opinion, they're both above average in IQ, Krooger is more cunning,
> and Ferstler is less compulsively dishonest (i.e. he chooses his moments
> to attempt deceptions, whereas Krooger lies reflexively).
>
But Ferster's eclectic lying indicates he's more cunning.
I'm soooo confused.

> But getting to the heart of the matter, try ranking Krooger and Fester on
> their more dominant traits:
>
> A. sense of honor
> B. paranoia
> C. hypocrisy
>
I have no problem with that, provided you can indicate how to match them to
within one tenth of a lie.

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius wrote:
>> Robert Morein said:
>>
>>> Having seen their recent cartoonish declarations about level
>>> matching for speaker comparisons, I'm curious of their relative
>>> ranking with respect to:
>>>
>>> 1. IQ
>>> 2. cunning
>>> 3. honesty
>>>
>>> It may be useful in this comparison to match their loudness levels
>>> to within one tenth of a lie.
>>>
>>> Opinions?
>>
>>
>> What does "RFC" stand for? "Robert's Fried Chicken"?
>
> Request For Co-Dependency.
>
>

Sorry, Tommy's busy this weekend.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[[email protected]]

I think Ferstler's a basically decent old guy who has had a sea change
in his career field-from objectivism to subjectivism, such as the
changes in painting after photography became popular, and the demotion
from artist to artisan of such icons as Vermeer, to art critics, and
hasn't coped real well whereas Arny is just stirring up **** for the
fun of it. Arny knows just enough to be dangerous, Ferstler probably
understands audio at the 1975-80 state of the art quite well.

[Lionel]

a écrit :

> Arny knows just enough to be dangerous,

Do you mean that he doesn't allow you to write silly things ?

:-D

[Robert Morein]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
> I think Ferstler's a basically decent old guy who has had a sea change
> in his career field-from objectivism to subjectivism, such as the
> changes in painting after photography became popular, and the demotion
> from artist to artisan of such icons as Vermeer, to art critics, and
> hasn't coped real well whereas Arny is just stirring up **** for the
> fun of it. Arny knows just enough to be dangerous, Ferstler probably
> understands audio at the 1975-80 state of the art quite well.
>
If by that, you mean Howard knows where to reshelve the books on the
subject, I would agree with you.

[Arny Krueger]

Lionel wrote:
> a écrit :
>
>> Arny knows just enough to be dangerous,
>
> Do you mean that he doesn't allow you to write silly things ?
>
> :-D

I can't stop him from writing them, but I can point them out to
bystanders.

[[email protected]]

Arny, they don't take you any more seriously than they take me. But, I
don't care, and you do.

[Joseph Oberlander]

Robert Morein wrote:

> Having seen their recent cartoonish declarations about level matching for
> speaker comparisons, I'm curious of their relative ranking with respect to:
>
> 1. IQ

Arny wins here by a mile.

> 2. cunning

And here again.

> 3. honesty

Tie.

Now, if it was Arny versus Middius...