My long-awaited confession

[Margaret von B.]

I'm addicted to cloudberry jam. :-)

Cheers,

Margaret

[Schizoid Man]

"Margaret von B." > wrote in message

> I'm addicted to cloudberry jam. :-)

Aaaah. Return of the prodigal racist.

[George M. Middius]

Margaret von B. said:

> I'm addicted to cloudberry jam. :-)

Do you mean Cloudberry Jam, the Norwegian/Swedish/Danish/whatever pop band?
I heard one of their records once. Much more listenable than Abba.

[Margaret von B.]

"Schizoid Man" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Margaret von B." > wrote in message
>
>> I'm addicted to cloudberry jam. :-)
>
> Aaaah. Return of the prodigal racist.

Lost your dot again?

MvB

[Schizoid Man]

"Margaret von B." > wrote in message

> "Schizoid Man" > wrote in message
>>
>> "Margaret von B." > wrote in message

>>> I'm addicted to cloudberry jam. :-)
>>
>> Aaaah. Return of the prodigal racist.
>
> Lost your dot again?

Yes I have. Please feel free to spew forth your racial stereotypes.

[Mike McKelvy]

Schizoid Man Apr 14, 6:27 pm


"Margaret von B." > wrote in
message



> "Schizoid Man" > wrote in message

>> "Margaret von B." > wrote in
message
>>> I'm addicted to cloudberry jam. :-)


>> Aaaah. Return of the prodigal racist.


> Lost your dot again?



Yes I have. Please feel free to spew forth your racial stereotypes


Why not, you feel fre to spew your stereotypes about those with a
different political viewpoint than yours.

[George M. Middius]

Schizoid Man said:

> > Lost your dot again?

> Yes I have. Please feel free to spew forth your racial stereotypes.

Regardless of what you want to believe, we're not all the same. Humans and
'borgs don't mix, and that's a fact.

[Arny Krueger]

George M. Middius wrote:
> Schizoid Man said:
>
>>> Lost your dot again?
>
>> Yes I have. Please feel free to spew forth your racial stereotypes.
>
> Regardless of what you want to believe, we're not all the same.
> Humans and 'borgs don't mix, and that's a fact.

If that's true Middius, why do you constantly want to mix it up with
those who you call borgs?

Hint for the Middius: You stop contradicting yourself any time you
want to...

[George M. Middius]

The Krooborg tries to make a pun.

> > Regardless of what you want to believe, we're not all the same.
> > Humans and 'borgs don't mix, and that's a fact.

> If that's true Middius, why do you constantly want to mix it up with
> those who you call borgs?

Did you have a spasm of 'borg laughter when you typed that, Turdy?

> Hint for the Middius: You stop contradicting yourself any time you
> want to...

Once again, you've broken the needle on the dorkiness meter.

[MINe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> The Krooborg tries to make a pun.
>
> > > Regardless of what you want to believe, we're not all the same.
> > > Humans and 'borgs don't mix, and that's a fact.
>
> > If that's true Middius, why do you constantly want to mix it up with
> > those who you call borgs?
>
> Did you have a spasm of 'borg laughter when you typed that, Turdy?
>
> > Hint for the Middius: You stop contradicting yourself any time you
> > want to...
>
> Once again, you've broken the needle on the dorkiness meter.

Be kind: he's probably workshopping his "Office" (USA) persona.

Stephen

[Schizoid Man]

"Mike McKelvy" > wrote in message

> Why not, you feel fre to spew your stereotypes about those with a
> different political viewpoint than yours.

Actually, I am not the rabid socialist that you think I am. I do admit that
I take a liberal stance on a lot of issues.

Of course, that's not to say that I feel don't feel that the most pressing
issue in a nation at war is whether we should ban the legal conjugation of
homosexuals.

That being said, it's the conservation bandwagon (maybe you're not on it)
ludicrous.

Case in point - Terri Schiavo.

Tom DeLay, knight in shining armour that he is, equates pulling the plug on
her to "state-sanctioned murder" and then goes on to condone violence
against judges who make such radical decisions. It obviously didn't bother
his conscience one bit when he pulled the plug on his own dad.

But I digress. It is his quantum virtue that is going to rescue America from
it's current state of moral bankruptcy. GMAFB.

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius wrote:
>> Schizoid Man said:
>>
>>>> Lost your dot again?
>>
>>> Yes I have. Please feel free to spew forth your racial stereotypes.
>>
>> Regardless of what you want to believe, we're not all the same.
>> Humans and 'borgs don't mix, and that's a fact.
>
> If that's true Middius, why do you constantly want to mix it up with
> those who you call borgs?
>
> Hint for the Middius: You stop contradicting yourself any time you
> want to...
>


Dimbulb, thanks for admitting you are too stupid to understand
thatt 'mixing with' and 'mixing it up with'
are two completely different concepts



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Mike McKelvy]

Schizo ses:

Actually, I am not the rabid socialist that you think I am. I do admit
that
I take a liberal stance on a lot of issues.

>Of course, that's not to say that I feel don't feel that the most
pressing
>issue in a nation at war is whether we should ban the legal
conjugation of
>homosexuals.

Nor do I, and I doubt anybody else does.


>That being said, it's the conservation bandwagon (maybe you're not on
it)
>ludicrous.

I assume you mean the Conservative bandwagon?


>Case in point - Terri Schiavo.

Completel bull**** IMO, the right wingers embarassed themselves with
that one, as I've already said.


>Tom DeLay, knight in shining armour that he is, equates pulling the
plug on
>her to "state-sanctioned murder" and then goes on to condone violence
>against judges who make such radical decisions. It obviously didn't
bother
>his conscience one bit when he pulled the plug on his own dad.

Did his dad have a DNR or Living will?

>But I digress. It is his quantum virtue that is going to rescue
America from
>it's current state of moral bankruptcy. GMAFB.


What moral bankruptcy? The only people I know of where I would use a
term like that is the radical leftists like Moveon.org and Michael
Moore types. I love seeing how they are at war with the more moderate
dems and I shall enjoy watching them become more and more powerless and
irrelevant.

[George M. Middius]

MINe 109 said:

> > Once again, you've broken the needle on the dorkiness meter.
>
> Be kind: he's probably workshopping his "Office" (USA) persona.

Ha! Kroogie is that big fat humorless dork, right?

[George M. Middius]

Schizoid Man said:

> Actually, I am not the rabid socialist that you think I am. I do admit that
> I take a liberal stance on a lot of issues.

While we're on the subject of hot buttons, what's your stance on Audio
'Borgism?

[George M. Middius]

Clyde Slick said:

> >> Regardless of what you want to believe, we're not all the same.
> >> Humans and 'borgs don't mix, and that's a fact.

> > If that's true Middius, why do you constantly want to mix it up with
> > those who you call borgs?

> Dimbulb, thanks for admitting you are too stupid to understand
> thatt 'mixing with' and 'mixing it up with'
> are two completely different concepts

Turdy's dump seemed to start off as a jeu de mots, but then, all too
predictably, the dorkiness revealed itself.

[Schizoid Man]

"Mike McKelvy" > wrote in message

>>Of course, that's not to say that I feel don't feel that the most
> pressing
>>issue in a nation at war is whether we should ban the legal
> conjugation of
>>homosexuals.
>
> Nor do I, and I doubt anybody else does.

Is that a fact? Then, pray, why is our C-in-C and the right-wingers that are
trying to hijack the Republican party staunchly pushing for a constitutional
amendment?

>>That being said, it's the conservation bandwagon (maybe you're not on
> it)
>>ludicrous.
>
> I assume you mean the Conservative bandwagon?

You assume correct. I suppose conservation is the antithesis of
conservative, not sure how I got the two confused.

>>Tom DeLay, knight in shining armour that he is, equates pulling the
> plug on
>>her to "state-sanctioned murder" and then goes on to condone violence
>>against judges who make such radical decisions. It obviously didn't
> bother
>>his conscience one bit when he pulled the plug on his own dad.
>
> Did his dad have a DNR or Living will?

Does it matter? In case you missed my point, my problem is not with his
actions but his pontificating.

>
>>But I digress. It is his quantum virtue that is going to rescue
> America from
>>it's current state of moral bankruptcy. GMAFB.
>
>
> What moral bankruptcy? The only people I know of where I would use a
> term like that is the radical leftists like Moveon.org and Michael
> Moore types. I love seeing how they are at war with the more moderate
> dems and I shall enjoy watching them become more and more powerless and
> irrelevant.

How about every commentator in the Wall Street Journal, Fox News and all the
other right-wing media outlets, along with all the usual Republican
suspects?

[Mike McKelvy]

Schizo sez:

"Mike McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>Of course, that's not to say that I feel don't feel that the most
> pressing
>>issue in a nation at war is whether we should ban the legal
> conjugation of
>>homosexuals.

> Nor do I, and I doubt anybody else does.



>Is that a fact? Then, pray, why is our C-in-C and the right-wingers
that are
>trying to hijack the Republican party staunchly pushing for a
constitutional
>amendment?

That's past tense, I haven't heard much about it since the election.
It was DOA even then.

>>That being said, it's the conservation bandwagon (maybe you're not on

> it)
>>ludicrous.

> I assume you mean the Conservative bandwagon?



>You assume correct. I suppose conservation is the antithesis of
>conservative, not sure how I got the two confused.

Conservation is what the GOP does regarding new tax law, they try to
conserve ink that might other wise be wasted on writing new taxes.

>>Tom DeLay, knight in shining armour that he is, equates pulling the
> plug on
>>her to "state-sanctioned murder" and then goes on to condone violence

>>against judges who make such radical decisions. It obviously didn't
> bother
>>his conscience one bit when he pulled the plug on his own dad.

> Did his dad have a DNR or Living will?



>Does it matter?

Of course it matters, if he did, it means his wishes were formalized
before the fact, which is what the problem was in ths Schiavo case,
nothing written.

> In case you missed my point, my problem is not with his
>actions but his pontificating.

OH PULLLEEEEZZZE! The Democrats have plenty of pontificating
azssholes, like Robert KKK Byrd, Teddy Hic Kennedy, Jimmy Misery Index
Carter, etc.

>>But I digress. It is his quantum virtue that is going to rescue
> America from
>>it's current state of moral bankruptcy. GMAFB.


> What moral bankruptcy? The only people I know of where I would use a

> term like that is the radical leftists like Moveon.org and Michael
> Moore types. I love seeing how they are at war with the more
moderate
> dems and I shall enjoy watching them become more and more powerless
and
> irrelevant.



>How about every commentator in the Wall Street Journal, Fox News and
all the
>other right-wing media outlets, along with all the usual Republican
>suspects?

How about them. So what, AFAIK nothing Delay has been accused of has
any legs and much of it is simply bull****.

[John Stone]

On 4/15/05 8:59 PM, in article
om, "Mike McKelvy"
> wrote:

> Schizo sez:
>

>> You assume correct. I suppose conservation is the antithesis of
>> conservative, not sure how I got the two confused.
>
> Conservation is what the GOP does regarding new tax law, they try to
> conserve ink that might other wise be wasted on writing new taxes.

Kind of like conserving gasoline by buying less but driving the same
distance. Try it sometime.


>
>>> Tom DeLay, knight in shining armour that he is, equates pulling the
>> plug on
>>> her to "state-sanctioned murder" and then goes on to condone violence
>
>>> against judges who make such radical decisions. It obviously didn't
>> bother
>>> his conscience one bit when he pulled the plug on his own dad.
>
>> Did his dad have a DNR or Living will?
>
>
>
>> Does it matter?
>
> Of course it matters, if he did, it means his wishes were formalized
> before the fact, which is what the problem was in ths Schiavo case,
> nothing written.
Yeah, and the fact that all the courts sided with her husband that these
were indeed her wishes means what? nothing?
>
>> In case you missed my point, my problem is not with his
>> actions but his pontificating.
>
> OH PULLLEEEEZZZE! The Democrats have plenty of pontificating
> azssholes, like Robert KKK Byrd, Teddy Hic Kennedy, Jimmy Misery Index
> Carter, etc.
>
HILARY. YOU FORGOT HILARY!

>>> But I digress. It is his quantum virtue that is going to rescue
>> America from
>>> it's current state of moral bankruptcy. GMAFB.
>
>
>> What moral bankruptcy? The only people I know of where I would use a
>
>> term like that is the radical leftists like Moveon.org and Michael
>> Moore types. I love seeing how they are at war with the more
> moderate
>> dems and I shall enjoy watching them become more and more powerless
> and
>> irrelevant.
>
>
>
>> How about every commentator in the Wall Street Journal, Fox News and
> all the
>> other right-wing media outlets, along with all the usual Republican
>> suspects?
>
> How about them. So what, AFAIK nothing Delay has been accused of has
> any legs and much of it is simply bull****.

Please. He's toast.

[Mike McKelvy]

John Stone writes:

>Yeah, and the fact that all the courts sided with her husband that
these
>were indeed her wishes means what? nothing?

It means having it in writing is still the best bet.
It means her parents were unwilling to face the truth and kept on with
the legal challenges despite the fact that they were bound to lose.
It means that there is a faction of the far right that doesn't like to
give up on such issues and either ignored the evidence or chose to
disregard it concerning the people who examined her and chose to
believe that there was a glimmer of hope for her recovery.

It also means that the far right made fools of themselves on this
issue, but that is not the only thing that one should base their
support of political parties on. Like the Democrats they have things I
agree with them on and things I part ways with them on. I have serious
problems with both parties on some other issues, which is why I belong
to neither the Republican or Democrat parties.

>> In case you missed my point, my problem is not with his
>> actions but his pontificating.


> OH PULLLEEEEZZZE! The Democrats have plenty of pontificating
> assholes, like Robert KKK Byrd, Teddy Hic Kennedy, Jimmy Misery Index

> Carter, etc.



HILARY. YOU FORGOT HILARY!

Not really, not as much as I'd like to. I hope she runs for President,
especially if it's against Rudy.
Even if she wins, it will be a hollow victory with the way the 2 houses
are stacked against the Dems.
I just hope W. gets the judiciary in shape before his term is over, but
for that he'll nedd cooperation from the Senate, which pretty much
means a rule change on filibusters.

[dizzy]

On 15 Apr 2005 18:59:33 -0700, "Mike McKelvy" >
wrote:

>AFAIK nothing Delay has been accused of has
>any legs and much of it is simply bull****.

He's garbage. Even for a politician.

[George M. Middius]

dizzy said:

> >AFAIK nothing Delay has been accused of

> He's garbage. Even for a politician.

To Mickey, all Republicans are automatically above reproach. It's not a
simple matter of which bugs he likes better. Would a sainthood be out of
the question for Delay? Was the Great Depression a plot by the Democratic
Party? Did Dubya invade Iraq to test the everybody-build-your-own-road
theory? These are the questions that occupy duh-Mikey's mind.

[Mike McKelvy]

Dizzy said:

>He's garbage. Even for a politician.

Which makes him no worse than Byrd, Kennedym Schumer, Kerry, or a host
of Dmocrats. He's a target primarily because he's a Republican with
clout.

If they can find something truly illegal that he's done, fine, but most
of what's being thrown up is empty.

[Mike McKelvy]

George gets it wrong yet again:

>To Mickey, all Republicans are automatically above reproach.

I've never said anything like that, but I also won't do what the
leftists do and claim that the GOP is inherently evil, just because
they don't believe in creating endless dependency.

> It's not a
>simple matter of which bugs he likes better. Would a sainthood be out
of
>the question for Delay? Was the Great Depression a plot by the
Democratic
>Party?

No, but it was the result of government ****ing with the economy.

>Did Dubya invade Iraq to test the everybody-build-your-own-road
>theory? These are the questions that occupy duh-Mikey's mind.

AFAIK, he invaded Iraq because there was credible evidence that Saddam
had WMD and was a very bad person who was violating the cease fire
agreement he signed. As predicted, things got worse before they
started getting better, and they are getting better throughout the
Middle East.

[John S. Dyson]

In article om>,
"Mike McKelvy" > writes:
> Dizzy said:
>
>>He's garbage. Even for a politician.
>
> Which makes him no worse than Byrd, Kennedym Schumer, Kerry, or a host
> of Dmocrats. He's a target primarily because he's a Republican with
> clout.
>
Even many of the Dems are admitting that Delay hasn't done anything illegal,
and SEEM to be essentially admitting that they feel like that he has
been wielding too much power.

These have been some of the few recent honest statements made by Dems.
They are almost admitting to their minimal justification for trying to push
Delay out.

In a way, these honest claims about the Dems lack of justification MIGHT
be the start of a change in Democrat tactic?

I certainly don't believe that Delay is a pro Democrat person, but that
shouldn't lead to his impeachment.

John

[Schizoid Man]

"John Stone" > wrote in message

>> How about them. So what, AFAIK nothing Delay has been accused of has
>> any legs and much of it is simply bull****.
>
> Please. He's toast.

Amen.