Patrick Turner
April 23rd 04, 12:02 PM
I have no time to either agree or disagree with your statements about
the Left, (or the Right, or the bloomin middle), but what you are saying does not belong on
rec.audio.tubes,
and it is discourteous that this thread is cross posted to so many news groups.
Could you please consider removing rec.audio.tubes from your list of addresses
to which your replies are posted.
Patrick Turner.
thelizman wrote:
> Kelly South wrote:
> >
> > Until yesterday, I was prepared to vote for George Bush again. But after the
> > crap from the White House regarding Kerry's war records I changed my mind.
> > It has become apparent that there are no more petty group of people anywhere
> > in politics than those that are in power now. I was totally disgusted by
> > their actions, and cannot nor will not vote for Bush again.
>
> HA HA HA! Yeah right, whatever. You are what talk-show hosts call a
> "seminar caller". I'll call you a "seminar poster". You see, it's
> readily obvious and transparent what you're doing - you're pretending
> that you felt one way, but were convinced to do something else, and you
> invent some cockamamy excuse for that transition.
>
> So here's the crux - the pivot point about which others can make up
> their mind if you are a seminar poster, or just an idiot. Kerry, the
> Kerry Campaign, Terry McCaulliffe (DNC chairman), and the liberal left
> have spent four years hounding Bush over his service records, alleging
> that he was AWOL from the Alabama National Guard. They pressed and
> pressed, and the White House ignored the issue because it was just a
> devisive tactic. But the more you tell a lie, the more people believe it
> just because they keep hearing it, and soon even people like McCaulliffe
> were calling Bush a "deserter" (which is not even within the defination
> of AWOL or UA). So, the Whitehouse released all of Bush's military
> records - even Dental Records which proved that he had shown up on post,
> reported for duty, and was present and accounted for on all dates for
> which he was required to muster. People who SERVED with Bush went on TV
> and said "yeah, he was there, he was enthusiastic about serving the
> guard, I spoke with him often and at length, he never missed muster".
> The only dates he didn't serve as scheduled were dates in which he
> received permission for leave so he could run for public office.
>
> So now, the tables are turned. Kerry has been hawking his war-hero
> image. Four purple hearts, and a silver star. He's played down the fact
> that he threw away these medals at an anti-war rally, and even finally
> admitted that those weren't his medals he tossed, but some that he had
> bought so his could stay in his case. No no, Kerry is the big war hero,
> and Bush is a loser who joined the national guard, which isn't even the
> real military. Thats what they want you to believe, and have basically
> said even while our own generation's National Guard troops are deployed
> into a war zone. Here's the thing - that first purple heart was for a
> scratch, and there were no witnesses that could cooberate Kerry's story
> about receiving an injury in battle. The only person who even saw
> Kerry's wound compared it to a fingernail scratch. Is this all Kerry is
> worried about? No. In an interview with Meet the Press in 1971, Kerry
> spoke of the atrocities committed by US troops, even confessing that he
> had taken part in war atrocities. What atrocities? Purple Heart's 2 and
> 3 were awarded after more serious injuries sustained in one of Kerry's
> ramming maneuvers, wherein he used the fastboat to ram civilian boats
> and docks in the free-fire zones along the rivers of the Me Kong. Kerry
> was at once reprimanded for killing as many as three non-combatant
> civilians in a single week, as well as killing a wounded enemy soldier -
> all war crimes.
>
> Now to clarify, it is NOT the Whitehouse pushing for Kerry to release
> his war records. No, in fact, the Whitehouse and George Bush never made
> any such call. Members of the media began this line of questioning, and
> last Sunday Kerry promised to release ALL of his war records
> immediately. Come Monday, reporters who went to his campaign office were
> told that only previously released records would be made available.
> That's because when America finds out that Kerry is a war criminal, his
> military credentials are shot completely.
>
> So now, what is your REAL reason for making this post. I bet you never
> planned to vote for Bush - it's all a really big lie.
>
> http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1088229/posts
> http://www.ktok.com/script/headline_newsmanager.php?id=282792&pagecontent=electionnews&feed_id=275
>
> --
> thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"
>
> Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
> http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
> a half of knowledge.
>
> teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
> teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
> "It's about the music, stupid"
>
> This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
> other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
> is forbidden.
the Left, (or the Right, or the bloomin middle), but what you are saying does not belong on
rec.audio.tubes,
and it is discourteous that this thread is cross posted to so many news groups.
Could you please consider removing rec.audio.tubes from your list of addresses
to which your replies are posted.
Patrick Turner.
thelizman wrote:
> Kelly South wrote:
> >
> > Until yesterday, I was prepared to vote for George Bush again. But after the
> > crap from the White House regarding Kerry's war records I changed my mind.
> > It has become apparent that there are no more petty group of people anywhere
> > in politics than those that are in power now. I was totally disgusted by
> > their actions, and cannot nor will not vote for Bush again.
>
> HA HA HA! Yeah right, whatever. You are what talk-show hosts call a
> "seminar caller". I'll call you a "seminar poster". You see, it's
> readily obvious and transparent what you're doing - you're pretending
> that you felt one way, but were convinced to do something else, and you
> invent some cockamamy excuse for that transition.
>
> So here's the crux - the pivot point about which others can make up
> their mind if you are a seminar poster, or just an idiot. Kerry, the
> Kerry Campaign, Terry McCaulliffe (DNC chairman), and the liberal left
> have spent four years hounding Bush over his service records, alleging
> that he was AWOL from the Alabama National Guard. They pressed and
> pressed, and the White House ignored the issue because it was just a
> devisive tactic. But the more you tell a lie, the more people believe it
> just because they keep hearing it, and soon even people like McCaulliffe
> were calling Bush a "deserter" (which is not even within the defination
> of AWOL or UA). So, the Whitehouse released all of Bush's military
> records - even Dental Records which proved that he had shown up on post,
> reported for duty, and was present and accounted for on all dates for
> which he was required to muster. People who SERVED with Bush went on TV
> and said "yeah, he was there, he was enthusiastic about serving the
> guard, I spoke with him often and at length, he never missed muster".
> The only dates he didn't serve as scheduled were dates in which he
> received permission for leave so he could run for public office.
>
> So now, the tables are turned. Kerry has been hawking his war-hero
> image. Four purple hearts, and a silver star. He's played down the fact
> that he threw away these medals at an anti-war rally, and even finally
> admitted that those weren't his medals he tossed, but some that he had
> bought so his could stay in his case. No no, Kerry is the big war hero,
> and Bush is a loser who joined the national guard, which isn't even the
> real military. Thats what they want you to believe, and have basically
> said even while our own generation's National Guard troops are deployed
> into a war zone. Here's the thing - that first purple heart was for a
> scratch, and there were no witnesses that could cooberate Kerry's story
> about receiving an injury in battle. The only person who even saw
> Kerry's wound compared it to a fingernail scratch. Is this all Kerry is
> worried about? No. In an interview with Meet the Press in 1971, Kerry
> spoke of the atrocities committed by US troops, even confessing that he
> had taken part in war atrocities. What atrocities? Purple Heart's 2 and
> 3 were awarded after more serious injuries sustained in one of Kerry's
> ramming maneuvers, wherein he used the fastboat to ram civilian boats
> and docks in the free-fire zones along the rivers of the Me Kong. Kerry
> was at once reprimanded for killing as many as three non-combatant
> civilians in a single week, as well as killing a wounded enemy soldier -
> all war crimes.
>
> Now to clarify, it is NOT the Whitehouse pushing for Kerry to release
> his war records. No, in fact, the Whitehouse and George Bush never made
> any such call. Members of the media began this line of questioning, and
> last Sunday Kerry promised to release ALL of his war records
> immediately. Come Monday, reporters who went to his campaign office were
> told that only previously released records would be made available.
> That's because when America finds out that Kerry is a war criminal, his
> military credentials are shot completely.
>
> So now, what is your REAL reason for making this post. I bet you never
> planned to vote for Bush - it's all a really big lie.
>
> http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1088229/posts
> http://www.ktok.com/script/headline_newsmanager.php?id=282792&pagecontent=electionnews&feed_id=275
>
> --
> thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"
>
> Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
> http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
> a half of knowledge.
>
> teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
> teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
> "It's about the music, stupid"
>
> This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
> other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
> is forbidden.