Lord Valve
April 23rd 04, 08:29 AM
That's rock solid, dude. Thanks. We could use you over on
alt.guitar.amps, which is infested with some of the nastiest
leftoids to ever join the Kerry Kool-Aid Klub you'll ever
meet up with...a dude from Time Magazine, a professional
propagandist who works for PRIO in Norway, etc. C'mon
over and help kick some leftist ass. ;-)
Lord Valve
American
thelizman wrote:
> Kelly South wrote:
> >
> > Until yesterday, I was prepared to vote for George Bush again. But after the
> > crap from the White House regarding Kerry's war records I changed my mind.
> > It has become apparent that there are no more petty group of people anywhere
> > in politics than those that are in power now. I was totally disgusted by
> > their actions, and cannot nor will not vote for Bush again.
>
> HA HA HA! Yeah right, whatever. You are what talk-show hosts call a
> "seminar caller". I'll call you a "seminar poster". You see, it's
> readily obvious and transparent what you're doing - you're pretending
> that you felt one way, but were convinced to do something else, and you
> invent some cockamamy excuse for that transition.
>
> So here's the crux - the pivot point about which others can make up
> their mind if you are a seminar poster, or just an idiot. Kerry, the
> Kerry Campaign, Terry McCaulliffe (DNC chairman), and the liberal left
> have spent four years hounding Bush over his service records, alleging
> that he was AWOL from the Alabama National Guard. They pressed and
> pressed, and the White House ignored the issue because it was just a
> devisive tactic. But the more you tell a lie, the more people believe it
> just because they keep hearing it, and soon even people like McCaulliffe
> were calling Bush a "deserter" (which is not even within the defination
> of AWOL or UA). So, the Whitehouse released all of Bush's military
> records - even Dental Records which proved that he had shown up on post,
> reported for duty, and was present and accounted for on all dates for
> which he was required to muster. People who SERVED with Bush went on TV
> and said "yeah, he was there, he was enthusiastic about serving the
> guard, I spoke with him often and at length, he never missed muster".
> The only dates he didn't serve as scheduled were dates in which he
> received permission for leave so he could run for public office.
>
> So now, the tables are turned. Kerry has been hawking his war-hero
> image. Four purple hearts, and a silver star. He's played down the fact
> that he threw away these medals at an anti-war rally, and even finally
> admitted that those weren't his medals he tossed, but some that he had
> bought so his could stay in his case. No no, Kerry is the big war hero,
> and Bush is a loser who joined the national guard, which isn't even the
> real military. Thats what they want you to believe, and have basically
> said even while our own generation's National Guard troops are deployed
> into a war zone. Here's the thing - that first purple heart was for a
> scratch, and there were no witnesses that could cooberate Kerry's story
> about receiving an injury in battle. The only person who even saw
> Kerry's wound compared it to a fingernail scratch. Is this all Kerry is
> worried about? No. In an interview with Meet the Press in 1971, Kerry
> spoke of the atrocities committed by US troops, even confessing that he
> had taken part in war atrocities. What atrocities? Purple Heart's 2 and
> 3 were awarded after more serious injuries sustained in one of Kerry's
> ramming maneuvers, wherein he used the fastboat to ram civilian boats
> and docks in the free-fire zones along the rivers of the Me Kong. Kerry
> was at once reprimanded for killing as many as three non-combatant
> civilians in a single week, as well as killing a wounded enemy soldier -
> all war crimes.
>
> Now to clarify, it is NOT the Whitehouse pushing for Kerry to release
> his war records. No, in fact, the Whitehouse and George Bush never made
> any such call. Members of the media began this line of questioning, and
> last Sunday Kerry promised to release ALL of his war records
> immediately. Come Monday, reporters who went to his campaign office were
> told that only previously released records would be made available.
> That's because when America finds out that Kerry is a war criminal, his
> military credentials are shot completely.
>
> So now, what is your REAL reason for making this post. I bet you never
> planned to vote for Bush - it's all a really big lie.
>
> http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1088229/posts
> http://www.ktok.com/script/headline_newsmanager.php?id=282792&pagecontent=electionnews&feed_id=275
>
> --
> thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"
>
> Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
> http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
> a half of knowledge.
>
> teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
> teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
> "It's about the music, stupid"
>
> This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
> other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
> is forbidden.
alt.guitar.amps, which is infested with some of the nastiest
leftoids to ever join the Kerry Kool-Aid Klub you'll ever
meet up with...a dude from Time Magazine, a professional
propagandist who works for PRIO in Norway, etc. C'mon
over and help kick some leftist ass. ;-)
Lord Valve
American
thelizman wrote:
> Kelly South wrote:
> >
> > Until yesterday, I was prepared to vote for George Bush again. But after the
> > crap from the White House regarding Kerry's war records I changed my mind.
> > It has become apparent that there are no more petty group of people anywhere
> > in politics than those that are in power now. I was totally disgusted by
> > their actions, and cannot nor will not vote for Bush again.
>
> HA HA HA! Yeah right, whatever. You are what talk-show hosts call a
> "seminar caller". I'll call you a "seminar poster". You see, it's
> readily obvious and transparent what you're doing - you're pretending
> that you felt one way, but were convinced to do something else, and you
> invent some cockamamy excuse for that transition.
>
> So here's the crux - the pivot point about which others can make up
> their mind if you are a seminar poster, or just an idiot. Kerry, the
> Kerry Campaign, Terry McCaulliffe (DNC chairman), and the liberal left
> have spent four years hounding Bush over his service records, alleging
> that he was AWOL from the Alabama National Guard. They pressed and
> pressed, and the White House ignored the issue because it was just a
> devisive tactic. But the more you tell a lie, the more people believe it
> just because they keep hearing it, and soon even people like McCaulliffe
> were calling Bush a "deserter" (which is not even within the defination
> of AWOL or UA). So, the Whitehouse released all of Bush's military
> records - even Dental Records which proved that he had shown up on post,
> reported for duty, and was present and accounted for on all dates for
> which he was required to muster. People who SERVED with Bush went on TV
> and said "yeah, he was there, he was enthusiastic about serving the
> guard, I spoke with him often and at length, he never missed muster".
> The only dates he didn't serve as scheduled were dates in which he
> received permission for leave so he could run for public office.
>
> So now, the tables are turned. Kerry has been hawking his war-hero
> image. Four purple hearts, and a silver star. He's played down the fact
> that he threw away these medals at an anti-war rally, and even finally
> admitted that those weren't his medals he tossed, but some that he had
> bought so his could stay in his case. No no, Kerry is the big war hero,
> and Bush is a loser who joined the national guard, which isn't even the
> real military. Thats what they want you to believe, and have basically
> said even while our own generation's National Guard troops are deployed
> into a war zone. Here's the thing - that first purple heart was for a
> scratch, and there were no witnesses that could cooberate Kerry's story
> about receiving an injury in battle. The only person who even saw
> Kerry's wound compared it to a fingernail scratch. Is this all Kerry is
> worried about? No. In an interview with Meet the Press in 1971, Kerry
> spoke of the atrocities committed by US troops, even confessing that he
> had taken part in war atrocities. What atrocities? Purple Heart's 2 and
> 3 were awarded after more serious injuries sustained in one of Kerry's
> ramming maneuvers, wherein he used the fastboat to ram civilian boats
> and docks in the free-fire zones along the rivers of the Me Kong. Kerry
> was at once reprimanded for killing as many as three non-combatant
> civilians in a single week, as well as killing a wounded enemy soldier -
> all war crimes.
>
> Now to clarify, it is NOT the Whitehouse pushing for Kerry to release
> his war records. No, in fact, the Whitehouse and George Bush never made
> any such call. Members of the media began this line of questioning, and
> last Sunday Kerry promised to release ALL of his war records
> immediately. Come Monday, reporters who went to his campaign office were
> told that only previously released records would be made available.
> That's because when America finds out that Kerry is a war criminal, his
> military credentials are shot completely.
>
> So now, what is your REAL reason for making this post. I bet you never
> planned to vote for Bush - it's all a really big lie.
>
> http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1088229/posts
> http://www.ktok.com/script/headline_newsmanager.php?id=282792&pagecontent=electionnews&feed_id=275
>
> --
> thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"
>
> Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
> http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
> a half of knowledge.
>
> teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
> teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
> "It's about the music, stupid"
>
> This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
> other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
> is forbidden.