Re: Bush, The WORST President in History ?

[Tha Ghee]

"thelizman" > wrote in message
...
>
> > at best, a 1.5 million net gain for Bush41, a 22 million gain for
Clinton,
> > and a close to 3 million loss for Bush43 utilizing Reagan's economic
model.
>
> I'd love to see you justify a 3 million job loss in light of the fact
> that unemployment is lower and real incomes are higher today than they
> were under Clinton. The facts are right there on the BLS website - there
> is only a net 240,000 job difference from the beginning of Bush's
> administration to when 3Q FY2003 figures were available. Job gains in 3Q
> and 4Q more than erase that figure.
>
>
> --
> thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"
>
> Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
> http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
> a half of knowledge.
>
> teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
> teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
> "It's about the music, stupid"
>
> This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
> other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
> is forbidden.

are you stupid, well we already know that, for much of Clintons term the UE
Rate was below 5% but it's not that way with GWB. the only ones getting
rich are the wealthy and ultra-wealthy. the ones that own the companies.
there is also this thing of a job freeze and the most applications for UE in
the history of the US.

[thelizman]

Tha Ghee wrote:
>
> are you stupid, well we already know that, for much of Clintons term the UE
> Rate was below 5% but it's not that way with GWB.

Sorry dumbass. Bush beat Clinton by .2%

http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/news2004/0304/031904-unemployment.htm

If you can't get a clue, I'll be happy to find one for you.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

[Tha Ghee]

"thelizman" > wrote in message
...
> Tha Ghee wrote:
> >
> > are you stupid, well we already know that, for much of Clintons term the
UE
> > Rate was below 5% but it's not that way with GWB.
>
> Sorry dumbass. Bush beat Clinton by .2%
>
>
http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/news2004/0304/031904-unemployment.htm
>
> If you can't get a clue, I'll be happy to find one for you.
>
dumbass you need to read your own articles but I guess all the touching of
ones self has left you a little blind

Bush's Unemployment Rate Nearly Identical to Clinton's Reelection Bid in
1996

this is the title from your article, no you get a clue, fool.

[thelizman]

Tha Ghee wrote:
> "thelizman" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> dumbass you need to read your own articles but I guess all the touching of
> ones self has left you a little blind
>
> Bush's Unemployment Rate Nearly Identical to Clinton's Reelection Bid in
> 1996
>
> this is the title from your article, no you get a clue, fool.

So, you read as far as the title? Look at the actual numbers. Bush
unemployment rate is .2% (that is zero point two percent) lower than
Clinton's.

I know your english is very poor, but your logic is even worse.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

[Tha Ghee]

"thelizman" > wrote in message
...
> Tha Ghee wrote:
> > "thelizman" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > dumbass you need to read your own articles but I guess all the touching
of ones self has left you a little blind
> >
> > Bush's Unemployment Rate Nearly Identical to Clinton's Reelection Bid in
> > 1996
> >
> > this is the title from your article, no you get a clue, fool.
>
> So, you read as far as the title? Look at the actual numbers. Bush
> unemployment rate is .2% (that is zero point two percent) lower than
> Clinton's.
>
> I know your english is very poor, but your logic is even worse.
>
> --
> thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"
>
> Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
> http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
> a half of knowledge.
>
> teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
> teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
> "It's about the music, stupid"
>
> This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
> other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
> is forbidden.

no I read the whole article. but then why does it say Nearly Identical it
should say less or can he not write correctly?? if he messes this up how
can we be led to believe his numbers?? My "English" is great but my grammar
is not. you intelligence is very low past CA. talk about a one trick pony.