Re: Arnii, admit it already [Archive]

View Full Version : Re: Arnii, admit it already

Arny Krueger

February 16th 05, 03:34 PM

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

> Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
> To play back recorded music.

Wrong. human beings also use audio equipment to make and record and
distribute music. They use audio equipment to develop, evuluate and maintain
other audio equipment.

It appears that in Middius world, there are no electronic instruments that
incorporate audio equipment. Middius wants us to believe that recordings
show up by magic in music stores and as deliveries from web sites - no other
audio equipment involved. He seems to think that sound reinforcment involves
nothing at all that could be considered to be audio equipment. No
self-respecting developer or producer of audio equipment ever uses audio
equipment as part of his work.

> Why can't you learn this simple fact?

Because it's wrong! Like your view of audio Middius, it's waaay too simple!

dave weil

February 16th 05, 03:56 PM

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:34:31 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>> Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
>> To play back recorded music.
>
>Wrong. human beings also use audio equipment to make and record and
>distribute music. They use audio equipment to develop, evuluate and maintain
>other audio equipment.

With the ultimate goal to play back recorded music, although
evuluating audio equipment is a goal of no one.

Arny Krueger

February 16th 05, 05:06 PM

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

> Oh, the feces. The ****fulness! The stupidity! The 'borgism makes me
> retch.
>
>>> Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
>>> To play back recorded music.
>
>> Wrong. human beings also use audio equipment to make and record and
>> distribute music. They use audio equipment to develop, evuluate and
>> maintain
>> other audio equipment.

>> It appears that in Middius world, there are no electronic instruments
>> that
>> incorporate audio equipment. Middius wants us to believe that recordings
>> show up by magic in music stores and as deliveries from web sites - no
>> other
>> audio equipment involved. He seems to think that sound reinforcment
>> involves
>> nothing at all that could be considered to be audio equipment. No
>> self-respecting developer or producer of audio equipment ever uses audio
>> equipment as part of his work.

> I notice you failed to comprehend the question the first time.

A Middius "debating-trade" smokescreen for the fact that I answered the
question that he should have asked.

> That was presumably because I included the appropriate context, i.e.
> discussions on RAO.

Note that Middius apparently reads "rec.audio.opinon" and perceives
"rec.audio.middius.opinion". Since Middius seems to be able comprehend only
consumer audio, that has to be what *ALL* audio opinion is about.

> Now, facing the truncated-for-brevity version,
> you trot out your "debating trade" garbage.

That's Middius-speak for "Since the Middius mind is narrow, the whole world
is narrow".

> Face it, Turdy -- you just don't get it. You have **** where your brains
> should be.

That's Middius-speak for "You again caught Middius sleeping, but Middius
can't give you credit for anything".

Michael McKelvy

February 16th 05, 09:08 PM

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Arnii, about your LD.... You fastened on the "enemies" comment, but that
> was
> only peripheral. We all know you're crazy. Now it's time to address
> something concrete.
>
> Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
> To play back recorded music.
>
> Why can't you learn this simple fact?
>
>
An answer that may be correct for you but you are not the entire audio
world.

Some people like to make recorded music.
Some people might like to use one kind of audio equipment to evaluate
another.

The world is bigger than you.

Most of it is much nicer too.

Michael McKelvy

February 16th 05, 09:09 PM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>> Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
>> To play back recorded music.
>
> Wrong. human beings also use audio equipment to make and record and
> distribute music. They use audio equipment to develop, evuluate and
> maintain other audio equipment.
>

No, no, Middius knows all, you must have it wrong.

> It appears that in Middius world, there are no electronic instruments that
> incorporate audio equipment. Middius wants us to believe that recordings
> show up by magic in music stores and as deliveries from web sites - no
> other audio equipment involved. He seems to think that sound reinforcment
> involves nothing at all that could be considered to be audio equipment. No
> self-respecting developer or producer of audio equipment ever uses audio
> equipment as part of his work.
>
>> Why can't you learn this simple fact?
>
Because he would ahve less to be ****ty about.

> Because it's wrong! Like your view of audio Middius, it's waaay too
> simple!
>
Nothing simple about ol' George.

Michael McKelvy

February 16th 05, 09:09 PM

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:34:31 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>>> Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
>>> To play back recorded music.
>>
>>Wrong. human beings also use audio equipment to make and record and
>>distribute music. They use audio equipment to develop, evuluate and
>>maintain
>>other audio equipment.
>
> With the ultimate goal to play back recorded music, although
> evuluating audio equipment is a goal of no one.

OSAF

Michael McKelvy

February 16th 05, 09:09 PM

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Oh, the feces. The ****fulness! The stupidity! The 'borgism makes me
> retch.
>
>> > Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
>> > To play back recorded music.
>
>> Wrong. human beings also use audio equipment to make and record and
>
> I notice you failed to comprehend the question the first time. That was
> presumably because I included the appropriate context, i.e. discussions on
> RAO. Now, facing the truncated-for-brevity version, you trot out your
> "debating trade" garbage.
>
> Face it, Turdy -- you just don't get it. You have **** where your brains
> should be.
>
>
Face it George, you're an asshole and live to make life miserable for
others.
Get a life.

Clyde Slick

February 16th 05, 10:48 PM

Clyde Slick

February 16th 05, 10:52 PM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> A Middius "debating-trade" smokescreen for the fact that I answered the
> question that he should have asked.
>

no, your debating trade tactic of answering the question you wanted to
ask, and not answering the question that was actually asked.
I see you are deep into your debate traininng regimen.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

dave weil

February 17th 05, 12:55 AM

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:09:04 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> wrote:

>
>"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:34:31 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
>>>> To play back recorded music.
>>>
>>>Wrong. human beings also use audio equipment to make and record and
>>>distribute music. They use audio equipment to develop, evuluate and
>>>maintain
>>>other audio equipment.
>>
>> With the ultimate goal to play back recorded music, although
>> evuluating audio equipment is a goal of no one.
>
>OSAF

Which part?

Arny Krueger

February 17th 05, 01:48 AM

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

> Clyde Slick said:
>
>> I see you are deep into your debate traininng regimen.
>
> Is that regimen anything like what humans call cleaning out the
> stables?

OK folks, I've pressured Middius into full fecal obsession mode. He's
cracked. I win the debate. ;-)

Arny Krueger

February 17th 05, 02:14 AM

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
nk.net
> "dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:34:31 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
>>>> To play back recorded music.
>>>
>>> Wrong. human beings also use audio equipment to make and record and
>>> distribute music. They use audio equipment to develop, evuluate and
>>> maintain
>>> other audio equipment.
>>
>> With the ultimate goal to play back recorded music, although
>> evuluating audio equipment is a goal of no one.
>
> OSAF

"Evaluating audio equipment is a goal of no one"?

OK, so ccording to Weil all the Stereophile reviewers and all the people who
post opinions about their evaluations of audio equipment are "no one"?

Clyde Slick

February 17th 05, 02:35 AM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>
>> Clyde Slick said:
>>
>>> I see you are deep into your debate traininng regimen.
>>
>> Is that regimen anything like what humans call cleaning out the
>> stables?
>
> OK folks, I've pressured Middius into full fecal obsession mode. He's
> cracked. I win the debate. ;-)
>

Sorry, Arny, your loads of **** are not the
currency of the realm.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

dave weil

February 17th 05, 09:39 PM

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:14:43 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
nk.net
>> "dave weil" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:34:31 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Why do human beings use audio equipment? The answer is so simple:
>>>>> To play back recorded music.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong. human beings also use audio equipment to make and record and
>>>> distribute music. They use audio equipment to develop, evuluate and
>>>> maintain
>>>> other audio equipment.
>>>
>>> With the ultimate goal to play back recorded music, although
>>> evuluating audio equipment is a goal of no one.
>>
>> OSAF
>
>"Evaluating audio equipment is a goal of no one"?

I don't see anything about *evaluating* anything.

>OK, so ccording to Weil all the Stereophile reviewers and all the people who
>post opinions about their evaluations of audio equipment are "no one"?

I didn't cc anyone in this thread, specially (sic) you.