RIP Jimmy Smith, Karl Haas, Keith Knudsen

[MINe 109]

Jazz organ, "Adventures In Good Music," and Doobie drummer.

Stephen

[Lionel]

MINe 109 a écrit :
> Jazz organ, "Adventures In Good Music," and Doobie drummer.

I was listening yesterday to one of his recordings with Wes
Montgomery (Jimmy Smith).

[dave weil]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:28:27 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>MINe 109 a écrit :
>> Jazz organ, "Adventures In Good Music," and Doobie drummer.
>
>I was listening yesterday to one of his recordings with Wes
>Montgomery (Jimmy Smith).

I can beat that. I was WATCHING him doing a riff on The Battle Hymn of
the Republic on the campy 60s flick Get Yourself a College Girl. After
that, it was Eric Burdon and the Animals doing a sterling verion of
Around and Around. And don't forget about the Dave Clark Five!

I win.

Again.

<chuckle>

[Lionel]

dave weil a écrit :
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:28:27 +0100, Lionel >
> wrote:
>
>
>>MINe 109 a écrit :
>>
>>>Jazz organ, "Adventures In Good Music," and Doobie drummer.
>>
>>I was listening yesterday to one of his recordings with Wes
>>Montgomery (Jimmy Smith).
>
>
> I can beat that. I was WATCHING him doing a riff on The Battle Hymn of
> the Republic on the campy 60s flick Get Yourself a College Girl. After
> that, it was Eric Burdon and the Animals doing a sterling verion of
> Around and Around. And don't forget about the Dave Clark Five!
>
> I win.
>
> Again.
>
> <chuckle>

My younger son is asking :
"Dad who is this old man you are discussing with ?"

You lose

Again.

:o)

[dave weil]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:43:20 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>dave weil a écrit :
>> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:28:27 +0100, Lionel >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>MINe 109 a écrit :
>>>
>>>>Jazz organ, "Adventures In Good Music," and Doobie drummer.
>>>
>>>I was listening yesterday to one of his recordings with Wes
>>>Montgomery (Jimmy Smith).
>>
>>
>> I can beat that. I was WATCHING him doing a riff on The Battle Hymn of
>> the Republic on the campy 60s flick Get Yourself a College Girl. After
>> that, it was Eric Burdon and the Animals doing a sterling verion of
>> Around and Around. And don't forget about the Dave Clark Five!
>>
>> I win.
>>
>> Again.
>>
>> <chuckle>
>
>My younger son is asking :
>"Dad who is this old man you are discussing with ?"

Weird family life you have there.

[Lionel]

dave weil a écrit :

> Weird family life you have there.

Have you any successful experience to share with us Dave ?
LOL !

You lose

Again.

:-)

[dave weil]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:55:51 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>You lose
>
>Again.

[dave weil]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:26:13 GMT, MINe 109 >
wrote:

>Jazz organ, "Adventures In Good Music," and Doobie drummer.
>
>Stephen

Don't forget about the co-writer of Ring of Fire, Merle Kilgore.

Here's a really nice encapulation of Jimmy Smith's career:

http://www.jazzateria.com/roots/jsmith.html

The man WAS Hammond.

[Lionel]

dave weil a écrit :

> The man WAS Hammond.

Funny I have already read that when Jack McDuff died.
Plagiarism Dave ?

[dave weil]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:42:54 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>dave weil a écrit :
>
>> The man WAS Hammond.
>
>Funny I have already read that when Jack McDuff died.
>Plagiarism Dave ?

Nope. After all, I didn't say that Jack McDuff WAS Hammond. There's
certainly a case to be made for that, but please excuse me for
expressing an opinion about the quality of Mr. Smith's tone.

[Lionel]

dave weil a écrit :
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:42:54 +0100, Lionel >
> wrote:
>
>
>>dave weil a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>The man WAS Hammond.
>>
>>Funny I have already read that when Jack McDuff died.
>>Plagiarism Dave ?
>
>
> Nope. After all, I didn't say that Jack McDuff WAS Hammond.

I have read that from a journalist.

> There's
> certainly a case to be made for that, but please excuse me for
> expressing an opinion about the quality of Mr. Smith's tone.

I would like to excuse you but the doubt persist...
Anyway it's not really important.

[dave weil]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:58:23 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>dave weil a écrit :
>> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:42:54 +0100, Lionel >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>dave weil a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>>The man WAS Hammond.
>>>
>>>Funny I have already read that when Jack McDuff died.
>>>Plagiarism Dave ?
>>
>>
>> Nope. After all, I didn't say that Jack McDuff WAS Hammond.
>
>I have read that from a journalist.

That's fine. Obviously, I didn't parrot him or her, even if I had read
it, because I said that about someone else.

>> There's
>> certainly a case to be made for that, but please excuse me for
>> expressing an opinion about the quality of Mr. Smith's tone.
>
>I would like to excuse you but the doubt persist...

<shrug>

>Anyway it's not really important.

Agreed. Which is why I'm amazed that you've gone after me about even
THIS.

[Lionel]

dave weil a écrit :

>>Anyway it's not really important.
>
>
> Agreed. Which is why I'm amazed that you've gone after me about even
> THIS.

Just to show you how stupid and futile it can be... ;-)

Let's say that 99.9% of your production of :
- "I win"
- "you lose"
- <chuckle>
- ...
concern far less important subjects.

[dave weil]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:31:54 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>dave weil a écrit :
>
>>>Anyway it's not really important.
>>
>>
>> Agreed. Which is why I'm amazed that you've gone after me about even
>> THIS.
>
>Just to show you how stupid and futile it can be... ;-)
>
>Let's say that 99.9% of your production of :
>- "I win"
>- "you lose"
>- <chuckle>
>- ...
>concern far less important subjects.

You figure out the difference between Christmas Eve and Christmas Day
yet?

[Lionel]

In >, dave weil wrote :

> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:31:54 +0100, Lionel >
> wrote:
>
>>dave weil a écrit :
>>
>>>>Anyway it's not really important.
>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed. Which is why I'm amazed that you've gone after me about even
>>> THIS.
>>
>>Just to show you how stupid and futile it can be... ;-)
>>
>>Let's say that 99.9% of your production of :
>>- "I win"
>>- "you lose"
>>- <chuckle>
>>- ...
>>concern far less important subjects.
>
> You figure out the difference between Christmas Eve and Christmas Day
> yet?

This is *your* battlefield Dave, only a naive can hope to survive more than
2 posts here. Even humour has fled long time ago... :-(

But you are right, this is exactly what I meant.
All these very important details... That make you say that a guy is a *liar*
because he has done a "half-day" error concerning a message posted 5 years
ago.

[dave weil]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:01:14 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>But you are right, this is exactly what I meant.
>All these very important details... That make you say that a guy is a *liar*
>because he has done a "half-day" error concerning a message posted 5 years
>ago.

But that's exactly what Arnold did to me earlier this very day, right
(on a post that precedes my very entry onto RAO.

And it wasn't ME who suddenly declared that *I* had erred when I
talked about Christmas Day vs. Christmas Eve. You were the one who
drew the distinction...

[Lionel]

In >, dave weil wrote :

> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:01:14 +0100, Lionel >
> wrote:
>
>>But you are right, this is exactly what I meant.
>>All these very important details... That make you say that a guy is a
>>*liar* because he has done a "half-day" error concerning a message posted
>>5 years ago.
>
> But that's exactly what Arnold did to me earlier this very day, right
> (on a post that precedes my very entry onto RAO.
>
> And it wasn't ME who suddenly declared that *I* had erred when I
> talked about Christmas Day vs. Christmas Eve. You were the one who
> drew the distinction...

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[dave weil]

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:09:43 +0100, Lionel >
wrote:

>In >, dave weil wrote :
>
>> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:01:14 +0100, Lionel >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>But you are right, this is exactly what I meant.
>>>All these very important details... That make you say that a guy is a
>>>*liar* because he has done a "half-day" error concerning a message posted
>>>5 years ago.
>>
>> But that's exactly what Arnold did to me earlier this very day, right
>> (on a post that precedes my very entry onto RAO.
>>
>> And it wasn't ME who suddenly declared that *I* had erred when I
>> talked about Christmas Day vs. Christmas Eve. You were the one who
>> drew the distinction...
>
>Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

In the immortal words of Trotsky - SCORE!

[Lionel]

In >, dave weil wrote :

> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:09:43 +0100, Lionel >
> wrote:
>
>>In >, dave weil wrote :
>>
>>> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:01:14 +0100, Lionel >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>But you are right, this is exactly what I meant.
>>>>All these very important details... That make you say that a guy is a
>>>>*liar* because he has done a "half-day" error concerning a message
>>>>posted 5 years ago.
>>>
>>> But that's exactly what Arnold did to me earlier this very day, right
>>> (on a post that precedes my very entry onto RAO.
>>>
>>> And it wasn't ME who suddenly declared that *I* had erred when I
>>> talked about Christmas Day vs. Christmas Eve. You were the one who
>>> drew the distinction...
>>
>>Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
> In the immortal words of Trotsky - SCORE!


Demonstration. :-)

[Arny Krueger]

"MINe 109" > wrote in message

> Jazz organ, "Adventures In Good Music," and Doobie drummer.

Karl Hass was a Detroiter, note.

[Arny Krueger]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message

> "MINe 109" > wrote in message
>
>> Jazz organ, "Adventures In Good Music," and Doobie drummer.

Correction:

> Karl Haas was a Detroiter, note.

[[email protected]]

Jiommy Smith Jimmy Smith Jimmy Smith. All we ****in' hear. You'd think
he was Ken Griffin or something...

[MINe 109]

In article . com>,
wrote:

> Jiommy Smith Jimmy Smith Jimmy Smith. All we ****in' hear. You'd think
> he was Ken Griffin or something...

Next time Ken Griffin dies, I'll post an obit.

Stephen