Re: Come on, Arnii

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message


> After all these years, you still haven't told us what's wrong with
> you.

George, more significantly what's wrong with you and Roy?

You seem to not be getting enough *action* lately.

So you've both decided to start accusing me of murdering family members,
again. Are you so deluded about your omnipotence that you again want to try
to raise the dead and try to torment me with them?

I note that the usual *Normal* guardians of morals and ethics like David and
Stephen have forgotten how to object to your misdeeds, again. What *power*
do you hold over them?

I notice that Richman also can see no wrong. Why can't he see your evil
deeds? Ditto for Scott - he does the see no evil thing so well, don't you
think?

George, you've also upset your lapdog Sander so much that he's decided to
give you another chance, which will no doubt be followed by another chance
and another chance...

Besides, what would Sander do to you of signficance? What would any of
them do?

Some day Middius I hope to understand what power you hold over these
seemingly at least marginally intelligent people that makes them lose their
tongues when you puke on RAO. Of course there's Art who can't make muster
for even being marginally intelligent.

[Lionel_Chapuis]

George M. Middius wrote:

>
>
> After all these years, you still haven't told us what's wrong with you.
> I've asked you myself many times, and all you do is babble about somebody
> or other "lying" about you. I'm sure you've been to at least one shrink,
> and probably several. Was the speculation about PPD confirmed in a real
> diagnosis? Or is it something else, something worse? Most doctors don't
> consider pedophilia an actual disease, even though there are treatments
> for it. They're rather drastic, however, and if you voluntarily went on
> one of them in order to avoid going to jail, maybe it made your other
> symptoms worse.
>
> But we on RAO are practically your second family, aren't we?


You are right he can even claim for your paternity... :-D


> You have
> Scott, dave, and occasionally Stephen acting as your big brothers. They're
> the ones who try to get you to shape up by patiently conversing with you
> about the plots you dream up. Then there are your virtual sisters --
> Mikey, Sluttie, and Thing. They're the ones who try to make the hurt go
> away by firing up your fear and loathing.


LOL, Middius's typical feminization of his adversaries.
Everybody has his own "axis of evil" isn'it George ?


And the rest of us try to be
> ersatz parents to you, constantly trying to drag you into reality against
> your wishes, urging you to make a contribution to society.
>
> And what does it get us? You won't share. You won't tell us what kind of
> treatment you're on, or at least what was recommended. You won't even tell
> us what the diagnosis was. It's hardly fair, is it? Nobody else on Usenet
> even cares about you anymore. Why do you pretend RAO hates you, when in
> reality, we're the only ones who indulge you at all?




----------
Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>George, you've also upset your lapdog Sander so much that he's decided to
>give you another chance, which will no doubt be followed by another chance
>and another chance...

>Besides, what would Sander do to you of signficance? What would any of
>them do?


Why are you dragging me into this, Arnold?
Whatever I say or do, it never seems to be good enough.
If anything, I decided to give *you* another chance.

Shall I forget about our little "truce" then and really start acting
as "Middius' lapdog" here? Would you prefer that?
Makes things easier for you, as you won't have to discriminate between
all those who oppose your views ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>> George, you've also upset your lapdog Sander so much that he's
>> decided to give you another chance, which will no doubt be followed
>> by another chance and another chance...
>
>> Besides, what would Sander do to you of signficance? What would
>> any of them do?

> Why are you dragging me into this, Arnold?

Wrong Sander, you already dragged yourself in with that other lame post.

But, thanks for trying to blame Middius' behavior on me.

> Whatever I say or do, it never seems to be good enough.

That has something to do with your inability to say the word when you've got
a mouth full of *it*.

> If anything, I decided to give *you* another chance.

Bite me!

> Shall I forget about our little "truce" then and really start acting
> as "Middius' lapdog" here? Would you prefer that?

Be yourself, Sander. I'd rather have you not be a hypocrite.

> Makes things easier for you, as you won't have to discriminate between
> all those who oppose your views ;-)

Sander, anytime you want to start sounding even more like Middius, please
feel free to do so.

[[email protected]]

George M. Middius wrote:

> I oppose religious views about
> everything. From audio to politics to gastronomy to biology,
religionism
> is the antithesis of clear thinking. It makes oppression through
enforced
> conformity seem comfortable.
>
>



Proof that even "George M. Middius" can have a rational thought. Whoda
thunk it? :-)

[Tom]

Torry-boooy tries to snuggle up to George:
>
> Proof that even "George M. Middius" can have a rational thought. Whoda
> thunk it? :-)
>



UNCLEAN!!!

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

>> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>>
>>> George, you've also upset your lapdog Sander so much that he's
>>> decided to give you another chance, which will no doubt be followed
>>> by another chance and another chance...
>>
>>> Besides, what would Sander do to you of signficance? What would
>>> any of them do?
>
>> Why are you dragging me into this, Arnold?
>
>Wrong Sander, you already dragged yourself in with that other lame post.
>
>But, thanks for trying to blame Middius' behavior on me.
>
>> Whatever I say or do, it never seems to be good enough.
>
>That has something to do with your inability to say the word when you've got
>a mouth full of *it*.
>
>> If anything, I decided to give *you* another chance.
>
>Bite me!
>
>> Shall I forget about our little "truce" then and really start acting
>> as "Middius' lapdog" here? Would you prefer that?
>
>Be yourself, Sander. I'd rather have you not be a hypocrite.
>
>> Makes things easier for you, as you won't have to discriminate between
>> all those who oppose your views ;-)
>
>Sander, anytime you want to start sounding even more like Middius, please
>feel free to do so.
>

You are truly unique, Arnold.

Enjoy your trip to New York.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[[email protected]]

Tom wrote:
>
> Torry-boooy tries to snuggle up to George:
>
>

Not hardly, my little castrati. ;-)

[[email protected]]

Tom wrote:
>
> Torry-boooy tries to snuggle up to George:
>
>

Not hardly, my little castrati. ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message


> You are truly unique, Arnold.

Not hardly, Sander.

Here's a challenge for you Sander. Accuse the next newbie that posts here of
murdering his child. See what happens!

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>> You are truly unique, Arnold.

>Not hardly, Sander.


In my perception you are, Arnold.


>Here's a challenge for you Sander. Accuse the next newbie that posts here of
>murdering his child. See what happens!


That's not my style and you know it, Arnold.

I think you should try to understand that some of us "normals" (if I
must be counted in that category) are different from eachother.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message


> I think you should try to understand that some of us "normals" (if I
> must be counted in that category) are different from eachother.

Subservience to the power of the infinite Middius seems to be a common
thread.

[dave weil]

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:16:26 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

>
>> You are truly unique, Arnold.
>
>Not hardly, Sander.

<s******>

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>> I think you should try to understand that some of us "normals" (if I
>> must be counted in that category) are different from eachother.

>Subservience to the power of the infinite Middius seems to be a common
>thread.


Let me make one thing very clear Arnold: I'm familiar with deaths in
my family and friend's circles (though not of my own child), and I'm
*very* familiar with the fragile status of life because of my wife's
illness.

That makes why I won't make the comments Middius does, nor do I
condone them.

OTOH and IMHO, every one here is responsible himself for what he or
she writes.
At times, Middius is very witty, and again, very skilled in the use of
written language.
Furtheron, we share some common interests like cats.

AFAIK, he has no power whatsoever over me or what I write here.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[[email protected]]

"George M. Middius" wrote:
> Tom said:
>
> > Torry-boooy tries to snuggle up to George:
>
> > > Proof that even "George M. Middius" can have a rational thought.
Whoda
> > > thunk it? :-)
>
> > UNCLEAN!!!
>
> Of course, the converse of my statement is what Krooger says and
believes.
>
>

And that is germane why, "George"?


>
> Hey Thing -- are you going to get into it with Mr. ****?
>
>

Are you out of the "predicting trade", "George"? ;-)


>
> Or does your
> definition of religion stop short of the dogmatic audio ideology you
share
> with Krooger, Ferstler, and the other 'borgs?
>

Tell me more about my "dogmatic audio ideology", "George". Are you
referring to the fact that I see rags like $tereopile for what they
are: "sucker delivery systems" for the makers of audio voodoo?

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>George M. Middius wrote:
>
>> I oppose religious views about
>> everything. From audio to politics to gastronomy to biology,
>religionism
>> is the antithesis of clear thinking. It makes oppression through
>enforced
>> conformity seem comfortable.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Proof that even "George M. Middius" can have a rational thought. Whoda
>thunk it? :-)

Amazing what happens when you stop playing your "I love Arny just to **** the
rest of you off" game.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...

>. Of course there's Art who can't make muster for even being marginally
>intelligent.
>

The IQ test challenge is still open. You haven't
accepted yet.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
>
>> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>>
>>> George, you've also upset your lapdog Sander so much that he's
>>> decided to give you another chance, which will no doubt be followed
>>> by another chance and another chance...
>>
>>> Besides, what would Sander do to you of signficance? What would
>>> any of them do?
>
>> Why are you dragging me into this, Arnold?
>
> Wrong Sander, you already dragged yourself in with that other lame post.
>
> But, thanks for trying to blame Middius' behavior on me.
>

False claim, He didn't put any blame on G's behavior, not
onto you or anyone else. G's behavior was not an issue.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
>
>> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>>
>>> George, you've also upset your lapdog Sander so much that he's
>>> decided to give you another chance, which will no doubt be followed
>>> by another chance and another chance...
>>
>>> Besides, what would Sander do to you of signficance? What would
>>> any of them do?
>
>> Why are you dragging me into this, Arnold?
>
> Wrong Sander, you already dragged yourself in with that other lame post.
>
> But, thanks for trying to blame Middius' behavior on me.
>

False claim, He didn't put any blame on G's behavior, not
onto you or anyone else. G's behavior was not an issue.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...

>
> You are truly unique, Arnold.
>

Praise the Lord!



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
>
>
>> You are truly unique, Arnold.
>
> Not hardly, Sander.
>
> Here's a challenge for you Sander. Accuse the next newbie that posts here
> of murdering his child. See what happens!
>

Are you claiming to be a newbie?



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
>
>
>> You are truly unique, Arnold.
>
> Not hardly, Sander.
>
> Here's a challenge for you Sander. Accuse the next newbie that posts here
> of murdering his child. See what happens!
>

Are you claiming to be a newbie?



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Michael Conzo]

In article . com,
" > wrote:

> Proof that even "George M. Middius" can have a rational thought. Whoda
> thunk it? :-)

You'll see, it's more like the passing of a kidney stone.

[Bruce J. Richman]

Clyde Slick wrote:


>"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
>>. Of course there's Art who can't make muster for even being marginally
>>intelligent.
>>
>
>The IQ test challenge is still open. You haven't
>accepted yet.
>
>
>
>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
>News==----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
>Newsgroups
>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
>
>
>
>
>
>

Krueger has a habit of making transparently false statements about other
people, and then failing to produce evidence to support them when challenged to
do so. He's a chronic liar and this has been proven on many occasions.


Bruce J. Richman

[Lionel]

Michael Conzo a écrit :
> In article . com,
> " > wrote:
>
>
>>Proof that even "George M. Middius" can have a rational thought. Whoda
>>thunk it? :-)
>
>
> You'll see, it's more like the passing of a kidney stone.

Except for Middius who has endured so many painful intrusions that he is
now particulary resistant.