Re: Another Kroopologist Shat Upon By Krooger

[Fella]

George M. Middius wrote:

>
> OK, Thing, now it's happened to you.
>
>
>

I think they just wanted to, or, ONEted to, demonstrate that they are
not a single borgish entity, so they staged a bogus disagreement one-act
play.

I can just imagine the high-pitch chihuahua yelping inside the trailer
of the terrorist as he read the "Wake up!" trump-impersonation from the
head .. err.. ****borg. Though it was already agreed upon between them
that they stage the bogus disagreement, must have really scared the ****
out of the "thing" (as you put it) nonetheless. :)

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message


> OK, Thing, now it's happened to you. Just as it happened to all who
> have gone before. Disagree once with Mr. ****, even to a minor
> degree, and the cavalcade of insults and attacks starts.

Here's the core of what's wrong with Middius. In his mind, any disagreement
is perceived by him as being and I quote "Shat Upon".

In Middius world people who don't walk in lock step are receiving a
"...cavalcade of insults and attacks...".

I challenge any of the Middius clones to publically disagree with Middius,
even in the slightest.

[Fella]

Arny Krueger wrote:

>
> I challenge any of the Middius clones
>

Ok, so now arny challenges non-existent things. :) Part of the
anti-high-end audiophile, audio equipment enjoyment lifetime campaign, I
reckon. :)

Give us the URL of the chinese-bootlegged pcavtech.com website arny. :)

[Arny Krueger]

"Fella" > wrote in message

> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>>
>> I challenge any of the Middius clones
>>
>
> Ok, so now arny challenges non-existent things. :)

Trust me Fella, you resemble that remark.

>Part of the anti-high-end audiophile, audio equipment enjoyment lifetime
> campaign, I reckon. :)

Yes Fella, your're a joke!

> Give us the URL of the chinese-bootlegged pcavtech.com website arny.
> :)

In 2001 when this happened, it was

http://best.163.com/~muslab/article/soundcard/Summary/index.htm

This site now appears to be unregistered.

You can find the details at:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/0f127b29c57a4d43

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>In Middius world people who don't walk in lock step are receiving a
>"...cavalcade of insults and attacks...".

>I challenge any of the Middius clones to publically disagree with Middius,
>even in the slightest.


Since you publicly called me a Middius clone, here you have it:

"George, you're an idiot."

Let's see what happens ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>> In Middius world people who don't walk in lock step are receiving a
>> "...cavalcade of insults and attacks...".
>
>> I challenge any of the Middius clones to publically disagree with
>> Middius, even in the slightest.
>
>
> Since you publicly called me a Middius clone, here you have it:
>
> "George, you're an idiot."
>
> Let's see what happens ;-)

Yeah, you were really sincere there, Sander.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>>> In Middius world people who don't walk in lock step are receiving a
>>> "...cavalcade of insults and attacks...".

>>> I challenge any of the Middius clones to publically disagree with
>>> Middius, even in the slightest.

>> Since you publicly called me a Middius clone, here you have it:

>> "George, you're an idiot."

>> Let's see what happens ;-)

>Yeah, you were really sincere there, Sander.

>zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Well, I accepted your challenge, didn't I?

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>>>> In Middius world people who don't walk in lock step are receiving a
>>>> "...cavalcade of insults and attacks...".
>
>>>> I challenge any of the Middius clones to publically disagree with
>>>> Middius, even in the slightest.
>
>>> Since you publicly called me a Middius clone, here you have it:
>
>>> "George, you're an idiot."
>
>>> Let's see what happens ;-)
>
>> Yeah, you were really sincere there, Sander.
>
>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
>
> Well, I accepted your challenge, didn't I?

Only in fun, it seems.

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>After Middius practiced up on my wife, anybody's wife seems to be fair game.
>And lest Albertz accuse you of the same thing, let me say that what Middius
>said about Sander's wife was a whole 'nuther thing.


The only one having said anything about my wife was Geosync, IIRC.

Yeah, I know, you meant Sanders' wife.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>> After Middius practiced up on my wife, anybody's wife seems to be
>> fair game. And lest Albertz accuse you of the same thing, let me say
>> that what Middius said about Sander's wife was a whole 'nuther thing.
>
>
> The only one having said anything about my wife was Geosync, IIRC.
>
> Yeah, I know, you meant Sanders' wife.

Sander, it's really funny to see how far you'll go to justify Middius. Very
funny, indeed.

[Arny Krueger]

"Paul Dormer" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" emitted :
>
>> I challenge any of the Middius clones to publicly disagree with
>> Middius, even in the slightest.
>
> You *wish* Middius had been cloned.

Why would that be?

[Sander deWaal]

George M. Middius > said:

>> "George, you're an idiot."

>Sander, you're a [gasp!] subjectivist. Take that!


Ooooh! You....you....<frothing at mouth>
I'm speechless!


>> Let's see what happens ;-)

>I'm terribly, terribly hurt by your betrayal, you backstabbing,
>Krooger-loving, meter-fondler.


Enjoy! ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>> Well, I accepted your challenge, didn't I?

>Only in fun, it seems.


That's what I'm here for, Arnold.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[[email protected]]

George M. "psychosis on parade" Middius wrote:

> Disagree once with ["George M. Middius], even to a minor degree, and
the
> cavalcade of insults and attacks starts.
>
>

Want proof?
>
Do these 'google groups' searchs:
>
sand**** author:middius
>
sandbrain author:middius
>
gregipus author:middius

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>It's kinda pathetic to see Sander sitting here talking about how admirable
>Middius' use of the English language is, when Middius used the English
>language to do all of these other highly reprehensible things.


Guns don't kill, people do, Arnold.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>Sander, it's really funny to see how far you'll go to justify Middius. Very
>funny, indeed.


I'm glad I'm providing you with some fun, Arnold.
It seems to me you needed a laugh.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>>> Well, I accepted your challenge, didn't I?
>
>> Only in fun, it seems.

> That's what I'm here for, Arnold.

Then Sander, why would you be so sensitive about my contributsions to the
tubes and vinyl threads?

(a) I just posted them for fun, because everybody knows that as a practical
matter both tubes and vinyl are dead.

(2) A least I stayed on topic and stuck to the relevant facts.

Humor and fun is best if you can do it and stay accurate, you know!

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>> It's kinda pathetic to see Sander sitting here talking about how
>> admirable Middius' use of the English language is, when Middius used
>> the English language to do all of these other highly reprehensible
>> things.
>
>
> Guns don't kill, people do, Arnold.

Like Middius, guns never take responisbility for the things they do.

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>> Sander, it's really funny to see how far you'll go to justify
>> Middius. Very funny, indeed.
>
>
> I'm glad I'm providing you with some fun, Arnold.
> It seems to me you needed a laugh.

You can't see past your display, can you Sander?

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>Then Sander, why would you be so sensitive about my contributsions to the
>tubes and vinyl threads?


I have not seen any contributsions to the tube and vinyl threads by
you, Arnold.


>(a) I just posted them for fun, because everybody knows that as a practical
>matter both tubes and vinyl are dead.


Google has been lying to you again.


>(2) A least I stayed on topic and stuck to the relevant facts.


You already admitted you don't read my posts very well, else you'd be
aware that I stayed on topic most of the time as well.
Relevant facts? Like "CD process around since the '50s"?


>Humor and fun is best if you can do it and stay accurate, you know!


Humor, like perception, is highly dependable on personality.
Obviously, we don't share the same kind of both.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>> Then Sander, why would you be so sensitive about my contributsions
>> to the tubes and vinyl threads?
>
>
> I have not seen any contributsions to the tube and vinyl threads by
> you, Arnold.

Good. Post dismissed.

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
>
> > "Arny Krueger" > said:
> >
> >>> Well, I accepted your challenge, didn't I?
> >
> >> Only in fun, it seems.
>
> > That's what I'm here for, Arnold.
>
> Then Sander, why would you be so sensitive about my contributsions to
the
> tubes and vinyl threads?
>
> (a) I just posted them for fun, because everybody knows that as a
practical
> matter both tubes and vinyl are dead.
>
>

Complete nonsense. You make no "contributions" to such threads and
tubes and vinyl are far from dead.



Scott Wheeler

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

> ****-for-Brains said:
>
>> (a) I just posted them for fun, because everybody knows that as a
>> practical matter both tubes and vinyl are dead.

> Can we not have religious proselytizing on RAO, please?

Inability to face reality noted.

<BTW folks, note how Middius runs away when I challenge him to post about
his personal collection of tubes and vinyl.>

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
oups.com
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
>>
>>> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>>>
>>>>> Well, I accepted your challenge, didn't I?
>>>
>>>> Only in fun, it seems.
>>
>>> That's what I'm here for, Arnold.
>>
>> Then Sander, why would you be so sensitive about my contributsions
>> to the tubes and vinyl threads?

>> (a) I just posted them for fun, because everybody knows that as a
>> practical matter both tubes and vinyl are dead.

> Complete nonsense.

Complete fact.

>You make no "contributions" to such threads

Denail of reality noted. Deconstruct my contributions at your own risk,
Scott.

> and tubes and vinyl are far from dead.

Tubes are mostly sold for MI amps, and vinyl is mostly sold for scratching.
Deconstruct at your own risk, Scott.

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
>
> <BTW folks, note how Middius runs away when I challenge him to post
about
> his personal collection of tubes and vinyl.>

>
>


"Middius" has vinyl tubes; he pumps them up and takes them to the pool
in the summer. ;-)

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com
> > Arny Krueger wrote:
> >> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> "Arny Krueger" > said:
> >>>
> >>>>> Well, I accepted your challenge, didn't I?
> >>>
> >>>> Only in fun, it seems.
> >>
> >>> That's what I'm here for, Arnold.
> >>
> >> Then Sander, why would you be so sensitive about my contributsions
> >> to the tubes and vinyl threads?
>
> >> (a) I just posted them for fun, because everybody knows that as a
> >> practical matter both tubes and vinyl are dead.
>
> > Complete nonsense.
>
> Complete fact.

Your ignorance is noted.


>
> >You make no "contributions" to such threads
>
> Denail of reality noted. Deconstruct my contributions at your own
risk,
> Scott.


Your ignorance of the meaning of "contribution" is noted.


>
> > and tubes and vinyl are far from dead.
>
> Tubes are mostly sold for MI amps, and vinyl is mostly sold for
scratching.
> Deconstruct at your own risk, Scott.


Why? You just did it yourself. Maybe you don't know what "dead" means
either. You also conveniently left out out the fact that high end tube
electronics are alive and well along with high end vinyl production. Oh
don't forget the fact that high end turntable/arm/cartridge production
is alive and well. Get back to me when you get in touch with reality.
Scott Wheeler

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
ups.com
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>
>> <BTW folks, note how Middius runs away when I challenge him to post
>> about his personal collection of tubes and vinyl.>

> "Middius" has vinyl tubes; he pumps them up and takes them to the pool
> in the summer. ;-)

I understand that one of them looks like an anatomically-correct young boy.
;-)

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
oups.com
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> oups.com

>>> and tubes and vinyl are far from dead.

>> Tubes are mostly sold for MI amps, and vinyl is mostly sold for
>> scratching. Deconstruct at your own risk, Scott.

> Why? You just did it yourself.

Thanks for admitting my critical points, Scott.

> Maybe you don't know what "dead" means either.

I surely due, especially given that this discussion is in the context of
consumer audio.

> You also conveniently left out out the fact that high end tube
> electronics are alive and well along with high end vinyl production.

At 1% or less of original volumes, include the non-consumer audio
contribution that is irrelevant to this discussion.


> Oh don't forget the fact that high end turntable/arm/cartridge
> production is alive and well.

At 1% or less of original volumes, including the non-consumer audio
contribution that is irrelevant to this discussion.


> Get back to me when you get in touch with reality.

Been there, done that.

>Scott Wheeler

Legal eggsphert extraordinaire.

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>>> It's kinda pathetic to see Sander sitting here talking about how
>>> admirable Middius' use of the English language is, when Middius used
>>> the English language to do all of these other highly reprehensible
>>> things.

>> Guns don't kill, people do, Arnold.

>Like Middius, guns never take responisbility for the things they do.


"Middius, Middius, Middius....."

Are you sure your world doesn't revolve around Middius?

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>> I'm glad I'm providing you with some fun, Arnold.
>> It seems to me you needed a laugh.

>You can't see past your display, can you Sander?


Au contraire, mon Borgité, I can see, hear and feel past my monitor,
through the DSL lines, right into your mind.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>>> Then Sander, why would you be so sensitive about my contributsions
>>> to the tubes and vinyl threads?

>> I have not seen any contributsions to the tube and vinyl threads by
>> you, Arnold.

>Good. Post dismissed.


This is not *my* idea of fun, Arnold.

P.S. when will you realize that your attempts to lump me in with
Middius are futile?

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Michael McKelvy]

"Fella" > wrote in message
...
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>>
>> OK, Thing, now it's happened to you.
>
> I think they just wanted to, or, ONEted to, demonstrate that they are not
> a single borgish entity, so they staged a bogus disagreement one-act play.
>
There you go again thinking. Obviouslynot your strong suit.

> I can just imagine the high-pitch chihuahua yelping inside the trailer of
> the terrorist as he read the "Wake up!" trump-impersonation from the head
> .. err.. ****borg.

Funny, the real Borg like folks here, the ones who seem to have one mind,
are guys like you, Middius, and the other usual suspects.

Though it was already agreed upon between them
> that they stage the bogus disagreement, must have really scared the ****
> out of the "thing" (as you put it) nonetheless. :)

The really scary thing is how blind you are to who the real bad guys are.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Fella" > wrote in message
...
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>>
>> I challenge any of the Middius clones
>
> Ok, so now arny challenges non-existent things. :) Part of the
> anti-high-end audiophile, audio equipment enjoyment lifetime campaign, I
> reckon. :)

As usual, your reckoning is wrong.
>
> Give us the URL of the chinese-bootlegged pcavtech.com website arny.

Give us a web site that you have created, especially that has ANY useful
information.

[Ruud Broens]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
: > wrote in message
: oups.com
: > Arny Krueger wrote:
: >> "Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
: >>
: >>> "Arny Krueger" > said:
: >>>
: >>>>> Well, I accepted your challenge, didn't I?
: >>>
: >>>> Only in fun, it seems.
: >>
: >>> That's what I'm here for, Arnold.
: >>
: >> Then Sander, why would you be so sensitive about my contributsions
: >> to the tubes and vinyl threads?
:
: >> (a) I just posted them for fun, because everybody knows that as a
: >> practical matter both tubes and vinyl are dead.
:
: > Complete nonsense.
:
: Complete fact.

complete fact, indeed, you're non-contributions. of course, never any substance,
just a little scream here, a little s****** there, eh ? so , contributsions *is*
the
better word for it :-)
aaah, to see Krueger fighting it out with Google ..
:
: >You make no "contributions" to such threads
:
: Denail of reality noted. Deconstruct my contributions at your own risk,
: Scott.

a recurring Krueger theme word: risk. What risk do we actually run , Arny ?
Is it the 'risk' of a Krueger no-show, when it's getting hot ??
wanna do some googling on that, just recently ???
Rudy

:
: > and tubes and vinyl are far from dead.
:
: Tubes are mostly sold for MI amps, and vinyl is mostly sold for scratching.
: Deconstruct at your own risk, Scott.
:
:

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>>>> It's kinda pathetic to see Sander sitting here talking about how
>>>> admirable Middius' use of the English language is, when Middius
>>>> used the English language to do all of these other highly
>>>> reprehensible things.
>
>>> Guns don't kill, people do, Arnold.
>
>> Like Middius, guns never take responsibility for the things they do.
>
>
> "Middius, Middius, Middius....."
>
> Are you sure your world doesn't revolve around Middius?

No, he's just such a big fat target. He's such a joke.

In the past year I've posted about 6,090 posts per a google count. A
similar google count shows that 161 of them mentioned middius.

I'll leave it to others to count how many times Middius mentioned me, as he
uses so many different insulting nicknames for me. However, I can get past
300 just by using a few of them.

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>>>> Then Sander, why would you be so sensitive about my contributsions
>>>> to the tubes and vinyl threads?
>
>>> I have not seen any contributsions to the tube and vinyl threads by
>>> you, Arnold.
>
>> Good. Post dismissed.

> This is not *my* idea of fun, Arnold.

It's my idea of fun, so live with it.

> P.S. when will you realize that your attempts to lump me in with
> Middius are futile?

They don't seem to be so futile. You're already defending yourself against
them. In fun, of course! ;-)

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>> "Middius, Middius, Middius....."

>> Are you sure your world doesn't revolve around Middius?

>No,


Ok, so you're not sure. Thanks for admitting that Arnold ;-)

Yes, that would be deceptive editing.


> he's just such a big fat target. He's such a joke.


Middius a target? Of what?

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Sander deWaal]

"Arny Krueger" > said:

>> This is not *my* idea of fun, Arnold.

>It's my idea of fun, so live with it.


I can live with it Arnold, just pointed out that we have different
opinions about fun.


>> P.S. when will you realize that your attempts to lump me in with
>> Middius are futile?

>They don't seem to be so futile. You're already defending yourself against
>them. In fun, of course! ;-)


Of course ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Sander deWaal]

George M. Middius > said:

>[voice of God ON]

>deWaal, I did not give you permission to speak my name. Thou shalt button
>thy lip until such time as I extend leave for you to tarry with the unclean
>ones, such as Krooger.

>[voice of God OFF]


I'm not religious, you will note.
I'm hearing voices in my head ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Tom]

Arny Krueger wrote:

> And lest Albertz accuse you of the same thing, let me say that what
Middius
> said about Sander's wife was a whole 'nuther thing.

You mean because he didn't forge a post from Lilianna requesting people
on several newsgroups to call her? Yes - I agree - it is a "whole
'nuther thing".

[Lionel]

Sander deWaal a écrit :
> "Arny Krueger" > said:

>>Like Middius, guns never take responisbility for the things they do.
>
>
>
> "Middius, Middius, Middius....."
>
> Are you sure your world doesn't revolve around Middius?

Statistically Middius spend more time to stalk Krueger than Krueger
waste time to speak about Middius...

[Sander deWaal]

Lionel > said:

>Statistically Middius spend more time to stalk Krueger than Krueger
>waste time to speak about Middius...


Quality, Lionel, not quantity! ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Lionel]

Sander deWaal a écrit :
> Lionel > said:
>
>
>>Statistically Middius spend more time to stalk Krueger than Krueger
>>waste time to speak about Middius...
>
>
>
> Quality, Lionel, not quantity! ;-)

Agreed.

This is an audio forum, Sander, and from an audio point of view Middius'
contribution is a rare bull****. ;-)

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ups.com
> > Arny Krueger wrote:
> >>
> >> <BTW folks, note how Middius runs away when I challenge him to
post
> >> about his personal collection of tubes and vinyl.>
>
> > "Middius" has vinyl tubes; he pumps them up and takes them to the
pool
> > in the summer. ;-)
>
> I understand that one of them looks like an anatomically-correct
young boy.
> ;-)
>
>


That's the one he calls "weil". Rumor has it "George" loves to "do the
vile with weil". ;-)

[Bruce J. Richman]

George M. Middius wrote:


>Sander deWaal said:
>
>> Quality, Lionel, not quantity! ;-)
>
>Maybe Slut values feces over clever verbiage.... ;-)
>
>

She is what she eats.



Bruce J. Richman

[Arny Krueger]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>>> "Middius, Middius, Middius....."
>
>>> Are you sure your world doesn't revolve around Middius?
>
>> No,
>
>
> Ok, so you're not sure. Thanks for admitting that Arnold ;-)
>
> Yes, that would be deceptive editing.

Why bother?

>> he's just such a big fat target. He's such a joke.
>
>
> Middius a target? Of what?

His own stupidity.

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message


> Or maybe it was the
> reference to "fr*sty fly*ng c*t f*ces". You know how children -- and
> the mentally ill -- love to play with their food. ;-)

Just goes to show how mentally incompetent Middius is becoming. He can't
remember that only he and Joe Duffy ever posted this phrase (with the
asterisks changed to vowels, natch) on RAO.

[Arny Krueger]

"Tom" > wrote in message
oups.com
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>> And lest Albertz accuse you of the same thing, let me say that what
>> Middius said about Sander's wife was a whole 'nuther thing.
>
> You mean because he didn't forge a post from Lilianna requesting
> people on several newsgroups to call her? Yes - I agree - it is a
> "whole 'nuther thing".

OK Tom let's play question and answer:

(1) Is your wife in the real estate business?

(2) Is she OK with receiving phone calls from the general public?

(3) Is there a phone number that is general public knowlege that she
personally answers or can be routed to her?

[Lionel]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>
>
>>Sander deWaal said:
>>
>>
>>>Quality, Lionel, not quantity! ;-)
>>
>>Maybe Slut values feces over clever verbiage.... ;-)
>>
>>
>
>
> She is what she eats.

LOL, it's not flattering for your compatriots. :-D

[Lionel_Chapuis]

George M. Middius wrote:

>
>
> Sander deWaal said:
>
> > Quality, Lionel, not quantity! ;-)
>
> Maybe Slut values feces over clever verbiage.... ;-)

I must avow that I have a soft spot for badinage. Unfortunatly my mirror doesn't tell me if it's clever badinage. :-)




----------
Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com
> > Arny Krueger wrote:
> >> > wrote in message
> >> oups.com
>
> >>> and tubes and vinyl are far from dead.
>
> >> Tubes are mostly sold for MI amps, and vinyl is mostly sold for
> >> scratching. Deconstruct at your own risk, Scott.
>
> > Why? You just did it yourself.
>
> Thanks for admitting my critical points, Scott.



That your own point contradicts your original assertion? No problem.
Happy to point it out.


>
> > Maybe you don't know what "dead" means either.
>
> I surely due,

? Mispelling or are you terminally ill?



especially given that this discussion is in the context of
> consumer audio.

And consumers are consuming new tube gear, new vinyl playback gear and
new vinyl. Hence your assertion that they were dead is simply
incorrect. It's pretty simple Arny.


>
> > You also conveniently left out out the fact that high end tube
> > electronics are alive and well along with high end vinyl
production.
>
> At 1% or less of original volumes, include the non-consumer audio
> contribution that is irrelevant to this discussion.

So you think niche markets are the same as dead? Think again. There are
people gainfully employed by the market for high end tube equipment,
high end vinyl playback equipment and the prodiuction of new high
fidelity vinyl. It is alive and well.


>
>
> > Oh don't forget the fact that high end turntable/arm/cartridge
> > production is alive and well.
>
> At 1% or less of original volumes, including the non-consumer audio
> contribution that is irrelevant to this discussion.

Please cite the numbers that support your assertion that High end
turntable/arm/ cartridge production is at 1% or less of it's original
volumes. I think you are quite mistaken.



>
>
> > Get back to me when you get in touch with reality.
>
> Been there, done that.
Get back there and stay there.




Scott Wheeler

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
oups.com
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> oups.com
>>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>>> > wrote in message
>>>> oups.com
>>
>>>>> and tubes and vinyl are far from dead.
>>
>>>> Tubes are mostly sold for MI amps, and vinyl is mostly sold for
>>>> scratching. Deconstruct at your own risk, Scott.
>>
>>> Why? You just did it yourself.
>>
>> Thanks for admitting my critical points, Scott.

> That your own point contradicts your original assertion? No problem.
> Happy to point it out.

Saying so doesn't make it so, Scott. I can handle you using this bogus means
to responding, you've done it before.

>>> Maybe you don't know what "dead" means either.

>> I surely do,
>
> ? Mispelling or are you terminally ill?

Guess.

> especially given that this discussion is in the context of
>> consumer audio.

> And consumers are consuming new tube gear, new vinyl playback gear and
> new vinyl.

In microscopic amounts.

>Hence your assertion that they were dead is simply
> incorrect. It's pretty simple Arny.

Inability to handle common figures of speech noted.

>>> You also conveniently left out out the fact that high end tube
>>> electronics are alive and well along with high end vinyl
> production.

>> At 1% or less of original volumes, include the non-consumer audio
>> contribution that is irrelevant to this discussion.

> So you think niche markets are the same as dead?

Apply that logic and nothing ever effectively disappears from the market, it
just gets a tinier and tinier niche. Scott, if you want to admit that inyl
and tubes are tiny niche markets, fine with me. It still means that compared
to the mainstream markets, they are effectively dead.

>Think again. There
> are people gainfully employed by the market for high end tube
> equipment, high end vinyl playback equipment and the prodiuction of
> new high fidelity vinyl. It is alive and well.

There are no doubt a few people gainfully employed making buggy whips. Ever
been to Greenfield Villiage? They've got people there making all sort of
products that used to be mainstream but are now effectively dead.

>>> Oh don't forget the fact that high end turntable/arm/cartridge
>>> production is alive and well.

>> At 1% or less of original volumes, including the non-consumer audio
>> contribution that is irrelevant to this discussion.

> Please cite the numbers that support your assertion that High end
> turntable/arm/ cartridge production is at 1% or less of it's original
> volumes.


> I think you are quite mistaken.

Unfortunately, it appears that the industry stopped keeping statistics for
sales of vinyl playback and tubed equipment a decade or more ago. No doubt,
due to a lack of interest.

[[email protected]]

George M. NostraMiddius wrote:
>
> OK, Thing, now it's happened to you. Just as it happened to all who
have
> gone before. Disagree once with Mr. ****, even to a minor degree, and
the
> cavalcade of insults and attacks starts. No merit points for your
past
> good deeds; no grace accorded for your onetime sturdiness in defense
of
> Kroofulness. Now, you are no different from me or Dormer or Boonie or
any
> of the Normals.
>
>


Middius prediction A: Krueger will apologize to Wheeler to avoid legal
action.
>

<ooops!>

>
Middius prediction B: Wheeler will prevail in court.
>


<ooops!>


>
Middius prediction C: Arny Krueger will never agree to debate Atkinson.
>


<ooops!>


>
Middius prediction D: Arny Krueger will commence to heap insults and
abuse upon me because we disagreed about Sander DeWaal.
>



<ooops!>

>

What opportunity will present itself next for "George" to play the
braying ass? ;-)

Stay tuned!

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com
> > Arny Krueger wrote:
> >> > wrote in message
> >> oups.com
> >>> Arny Krueger wrote:
> >>>> > wrote in message
> >>>> oups.com
> >>
> >>>>> and tubes and vinyl are far from dead.
> >>
> >>>> Tubes are mostly sold for MI amps, and vinyl is mostly sold for
> >>>> scratching. Deconstruct at your own risk, Scott.
> >>
> >>> Why? You just did it yourself.
> >>
> >> Thanks for admitting my critical points, Scott.
>
> > That your own point contradicts your original assertion? No
problem.
> > Happy to point it out.
>
> Saying so doesn't make it so, Scott. I can handle you using this
bogus means
> to responding, you've done it before.



Ah, the logic went right over your head. Nothing I can do about that.


>
> >>> Maybe you don't know what "dead" means either.
>
> >> I surely do,
> >
> > ? Mispelling or are you terminally ill?
>
> Guess.


With you I think an error in English is always the best bet.



>
> > especially given that this discussion is in the context of
> >> consumer audio.
>
> > And consumers are consuming new tube gear, new vinyl playback gear
and
> > new vinyl.
>
> In microscopic amounts.



No. In amounts significant enough for many people to make a good living
off the market.



>
> >Hence your assertion that they were dead is simply
> > incorrect. It's pretty simple Arny.
>
> Inability to handle common figures of speech noted.



Perhaps you should note it for yourself. If you can cite any other
examples of thriving markets being called figuratively dead please feel
free to do so. Please feel free to show how "dead" apty applies to any
market that has seen growth over the previous 10 years, figuritvely.



>
> >>> You also conveniently left out out the fact that high end tube
> >>> electronics are alive and well along with high end vinyl
> > production.
>
> >> At 1% or less of original volumes, include the non-consumer audio
> >> contribution that is irrelevant to this discussion.
>
> > So you think niche markets are the same as dead?
>
> Apply that logic and nothing ever effectively disappears from the
market,



Wrong.


it
> just gets a tinier and tinier niche.


I suggest you get your facts straight. This market has grown over the
past 10 years and is keeping a number of people gainfully employed.
That is what we call a thriving niche market.



Scott, if you want to admit that inyl
> and tubes are tiny niche markets, fine with me.



I have always admitted that they were niche markets. Hell, high end
audio is a niche market. Hobbies generally are a source for niche
markets when they are not in a fad stage.


It still means that compared
> to the mainstream markets, they are effectively dead.



No it means they are niche markets.



>
> >Think again. There
> > are people gainfully employed by the market for high end tube
> > equipment, high end vinyl playback equipment and the prodiuction of
> > new high fidelity vinyl. It is alive and well.
>
> There are no doubt a few people gainfully employed making buggy
whips.
Ever
> been to Greenfield Villiage? They've got people there making all sort
of
> products that used to be mainstream but are now effectively dead.


Really? There is a world wide demand for buggy whips? There clearly is
such a demand for high end tube equipment, high end vinyl playback
equipment and high fidelity vinyl. I think your analogy fails on many
levels.



>
> >>> Oh don't forget the fact that high end turntable/arm/cartridge
> >>> production is alive and well.
>
> >> At 1% or less of original volumes, including the non-consumer
audio
> >> contribution that is irrelevant to this discussion.
>
> > Please cite the numbers that support your assertion that High end
> > turntable/arm/ cartridge production is at 1% or less of it's
original
> > volumes.
>
>
> > I think you are quite mistaken.
>
> Unfortunately, it appears that the industry stopped keeping
statistics for
> sales of vinyl playback and tubed equipment a decade or more ago. No
doubt,
> due to a lack of interest.



Thanks for admitting you have nothing to support your posturing.
Scott Wheeler

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> I challenge any of the Middius clones to publically disagree with Middius,
> even in the slightest.

Duh... Gay marriage.
I'm a bad clone



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>>>> In Middius world people who don't walk in lock step are receiving a
>>>> "...cavalcade of insults and attacks...".
>
>>>> I challenge any of the Middius clones to publically disagree with
>>>> Middius, even in the slightest.
>
>>> Since you publicly called me a Middius clone, here you have it:
>
>>> "George, you're an idiot."
>
>>> Let's see what happens ;-)
>
>>Yeah, you were really sincere there, Sander.
>
>>zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
>
> Well, I accepted your challenge, didn't I?
>

See what you are dealing with?



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

wrote in message
...
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals
>



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...

>

> It's kinda pathetic to see Sander sitting here talking about how admirable
> Middius' use of the English language is, when Middius used the English
> language to do all of these other highly reprehensible things.

Proper Krooglish is the correct language for saying reprehensible things.
Casual Krooglish is more appropriate for pointless abx discussions.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
k.net...
>
> The really scary thing is how blind you are to who the real bad guys are.

If irony backed up your toilet and flooded your house with feces.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Sander deWaal a écrit :
>> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>>>Like Middius, guns never take responisbility for the things they do.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Middius, Middius, Middius....."
>>
>> Are you sure your world doesn't revolve around Middius?
>
> Statistically Middius spend more time to stalk Krueger than Krueger waste
> time to speak about Middius...

Statistics lie, French statistics lie and take bribes.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Sander deWaal" > wrote in message
...
> "Arny Krueger" > said:
>
>>Why bother?
>
>
> Because it's fun? ;-)
>
>
>>> Middius a target? Of what?
>
>>His own stupidity.
>
>
> Hmmm......I'll honor your request for stopping hostilities and
> therefor won't post a *very* obvious retort.
>
Does it start with the words "if irony.."?



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Lionel]

In >, Clyde Slick wrote :


> Statistics lie, French statistics lie and take bribes.

You should be prudent with such assertions just when the world is
celebrating Auschwitz liberation 60th anniversary.

So many revisionists would find interst in promotion of such pueril claim.

[Tom]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote
>
> (1) Is your wife in the real estate business?
>
> (2) Is she OK with receiving phone calls from the general public?
>
> (3) Is there a phone number that is general public knowlege that she
> personally answers or can be routed to her?

Are you a complete****ingidiot?

[Fella]

Clyde Slick wrote:

> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> k.net...
>
>>The really scary thing is how blind you are to who the real bad guys are.
>
>
> If irony backed up your toilet and flooded your house with feces.
>
>

LOL!

[Arny Krueger]

"Tom" > wrote in message

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote
>>
>> (1) Is your wife in the real estate business?
>>
>> (2) Is she OK with receiving phone calls from the general public?
>>
>> (3) Is there a phone number that is general public knowlege that she
>> personally answers or can be routed to her?
>
> Are you a complete****ingidiot?

Thanks for your clean and concise non-answer, Tom. In short, you're
obviouisly afraid to answer my simple relevant questions.

[Tom]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote
>>>
>>> (1) Is your wife in the real estate business?
>>>
>>> (2) Is she OK with receiving phone calls from the general public?
>>>
>>> (3) Is there a phone number that is general public knowlege that she
>>> personally answers or can be routed to her?
>>
>> Are you a complete****ingidiot?
>
> Thanks for your clean and concise non-answer, Tom. In short, you're
> obviouisly afraid to answer my simple relevant questions.

What is your point, nerd?
That I should be thankful that Torry-boooy posted that forgery?
It made good business sense?

Everyone should hear the recording so they can take your posts
in context. No one would ever have any doubts whether you're
messed up. They wouldn't just put you down and slowly
back away. They would throw you down and run away.

[dave weil]

On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:43:44 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>(2) Is she OK with receiving phone calls from the general public?

Is *your* wife?

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Tom" > wrote in message
>
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote
> >>
> >> (1) Is your wife in the real estate business?
> >>
> >> (2) Is she OK with receiving phone calls from the general public?
> >>
> >> (3) Is there a phone number that is general public knowlege that
she
> >> personally answers or can be routed to her?
> >
> > Are you a complete****ingidiot?
>
> Thanks for your clean and concise non-answer, Tom. In short, you're
> obviouisly afraid to answer my simple relevant questions.
>
>

Here's the truth Tom is trying to avoid:
>

http://tinyurl.com/5xa9t
>

and:
>

http://tinyurl.com/4kzya
>

The woman is on two websites replete with email contacts and phone
numbers. She sure must be trying to avoid public contact! ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
oups.com
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> "Tom" > wrote in message
>>
>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote
>>>>
>>>> (1) Is your wife in the real estate business?

Correct answer that Tom is trying to conceal:

http://tinyurl.com/5xa9t

Which says that Ms. Albertz is a realtor.

>>>> (2) Is she OK with receiving phone calls from the general public?

Correct answer that Tom is trying to conceal:

http://tinyurl.com/5xa9t

Which says that Ms. Albertz wants the world to know her phone number,
presumably to call her up with real estate-realted stuff.

>>>> (3) Is there a phone number that is general public knowlege that
>>>> she personally answers or can be routed to her?

See above.

>>> Are you a complete****ingidiot?

Only an idiot tries to conceal that which is obvious.

>> Thanks for your clean and concise non-answer, Tom. In short, you're
>> obviouisly afraid to answer my simple relevant questions.

> Here's the truth Tom is trying to avoid:

> http://tinyurl.com/5xa9t

Hmm, a picture, an address and a bunch of phone numbers.

> and:

> http://tinyurl.com/4kzya

The shorter 'do seems more complementary.

> The woman is on two websites replete with email contacts and phone
> numbers. She sure must be trying to avoid public contact! ;-)

Yup, its a big secret! ;-)

All things considered, I see nothing to be ashamed about related to Ms
Albertz. I wonder what Tom is yammering about?

[Tom]

wrote:
> Here's the truth Tom is trying to avoid:
> http://tinyurl.com/5xa9t
> and:
> http://tinyurl.com/4kzya
> The woman is on two websites replete with email contacts and phone
> numbers. She sure must be trying to avoid public contact! ;-)

I'm not trying to avoid anything. I'm trying to point out that you
will callously expose an innocent person to harassment from newsgroup
idiots because you can't deal with me on a level playing field. Why
look - you've provided the evidence again! Case closed! ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"Tom" > wrote in message
oups.com

> wrote:

>> Here's the truth Tom is trying to avoid:
>> http://tinyurl.com/5xa9t
>> and:
>> http://tinyurl.com/4kzya
>> The woman is on two websites replete with email contacts and phone
>> numbers. She sure must be trying to avoid public contact! ;-)

> I'm not trying to avoid anything.

That's why you avoided answering my questions, right Tom? You didn't want to
avoid anything?

> I'm trying to point out that you
> will callously expose an innocent person to harassment from newsgroup
> idiots because you can't deal with me on a level playing field.

Thanks Tom for admitting that this newsgroup is populated by idiots,
presumably yourself included.

> Why look - you've provided the evidence again! Case closed! ;-)

It's a public web site, right?

Tom, where were your objections when similar information was posted here
related to my wife and church?

Why are you still aiding and abetting the people who did that?

BTW Tom, aren't you the guy who posted here under the handle surfxxxx?

[[email protected]]

Tom-the-hypocrite postured:
>
>you can't deal with me on a level playing field.
>
>
>

A more accurate assessment: I won't sink to your level by a) sending
out emails urging others to file false police reports, b) supporting
people who file (or pretend to file) false police reports and
c)supporting people who make and distribute illicit recordings of
private telephone conversations.

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Tom" > wrote in message
> oups.com
>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Here's the truth Tom is trying to avoid:
> >> http://tinyurl.com/5xa9t
> >> and:
> >> http://tinyurl.com/4kzya
> >> The woman is on two websites replete with email contacts and phone
> >> numbers. She sure must be trying to avoid public contact! ;-)
>
> > I'm not trying to avoid anything.
>
> That's why you avoided answering my questions, right Tom? You didn't
want to
> avoid anything?
>
> > I'm trying to point out that you
> > will callously expose an innocent person to harassment from
newsgroup
> > idiots because you can't deal with me on a level playing field.
>
> Thanks Tom for admitting that this newsgroup is populated by idiots,
> presumably yourself included.
>
> > Why look - you've provided the evidence again! Case closed! ;-)
>
> It's a public web site, right?
>
> Tom, where were your objections when similar information was posted
here
> related to my wife and church?
>
>

Tom Albertz is right up there with "Middius" and Phillips in the
hypocrisy department.
>
>
> Why are you still aiding and abetting the people who did that?
>
>
Because he's "feeling nasty"?
>
> BTW Tom, aren't you the guy who posted here under the handle
surfxxxx?
>


Surf
Surfshop
Surfinator
Pat Mabottom
torizits
>
.....and several others

>
He is also the guy that "Middius" used to call "Tom Yutz" and "gumdrop"
before Tom gave in and "joined the Normals".

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
ups.com
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> "Tom" > wrote in message
>> oups.com

>>> wrote:

>>>> Here's the truth Tom is trying to avoid:
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/5xa9t
>>>> and:
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/4kzya
>>>> The woman is on two websites replete with email contacts and phone
>>>> numbers. She sure must be trying to avoid public contact! ;-)

>>> I'm not trying to avoid anything.

>> That's why you avoided answering my questions, right Tom? You didn't
>> want to avoid anything?

>>> I'm trying to point out that you will callously expose an innocent
>>> person to harassment from
>>> newsgroup idiots because you can't deal with me on a level playing
>>> field.

>> Thanks Tom for admitting that this newsgroup is populated by idiots,
>> presumably yourself included.

>>> Why look - you've provided the evidence again! Case closed! ;-)

>> It's a public web site, right?

>> Tom, where were your objections when similar information was posted
>> here related to my wife and church?

> Tom Albertz is right up there with "Middius" and Phillips in the
> hypocrisy department.

>> Why are you still aiding and abetting the people who did that?

> Because he's "feeling nasty"?

>> BTW Tom, aren't you the guy who posted here under the handle
> surfxxxx?

> Surfshop

Referred to my wife 3 times as "Kr**b*tch" (fill in vowels for correct
quote)

> He is also the guy that "Middius" used to call "Tom Yutz" and
> "gumdrop" before Tom gave in and "joined the Normals".

Part of the Middius reading of "How To Win Friends And Influence People". He
just threatens them with humiliation until they cave in to him and join him
in attacking the people Middius targets.

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ups.com
> > Arny Krueger wrote:
> >> "Tom" > wrote in message
> >> oups.com
>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> Here's the truth Tom is trying to avoid:
> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/5xa9t
> >>>> and:
> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/4kzya
> >>>> The woman is on two websites replete with email contacts and
phone
> >>>> numbers. She sure must be trying to avoid public contact! ;-)
>
> >>> I'm not trying to avoid anything.
>
> >> That's why you avoided answering my questions, right Tom? You
didn't
> >> want to avoid anything?
>
> >>> I'm trying to point out that you will callously expose an
innocent
> >>> person to harassment from
> >>> newsgroup idiots because you can't deal with me on a level
playing
> >>> field.
>
> >> Thanks Tom for admitting that this newsgroup is populated by
idiots,
> >> presumably yourself included.
>
> >>> Why look - you've provided the evidence again! Case closed!
;-)
>
> >> It's a public web site, right?
>
> >> Tom, where were your objections when similar information was
posted
> >> here related to my wife and church?
>
> > Tom Albertz is right up there with "Middius" and Phillips in the
> > hypocrisy department.
>
> >> Why are you still aiding and abetting the people who did that?
>
> > Because he's "feeling nasty"?
>
> >> BTW Tom, aren't you the guy who posted here under the handle
> > surfxxxx?
>
> > Surfshop
>
> Referred to my wife 3 times as "Kr**b*tch" (fill in vowels for
correct
> quote)
>
>


Tom's been "feeling nasty" for a long time.



>
> > He is also the guy that "Middius" used to call "Tom Yutz" and
> > "gumdrop" before Tom gave in and "joined the Normals".
>
> Part of the Middius reading of "How To Win Friends And Influence
People". He
> just threatens them with humiliation until they cave in to him and
join him
> in attacking the people Middius targets.
>
>


Yep, it worked on Tom Albertz and it worked dave weil. Sad.

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
ups.com
> Arny Krueger wrote:

>> > wrote in message
>> ups.com

>>> Arny Krueger wrote:

>>>> "Tom" > wrote in message
>>>> oups.com

>>>> BTW Tom, aren't you the guy who posted here under the handle
>>>> surfxxxx?

>>> Surfshop

>> Referred to my wife 3 times as "Kr**b*tch" (fill in vowels for
>> correct quote)

> Tom's been "feeling nasty" for a long time.

Just goes to show that Tom has two sets of rules of personal conduct. One
for him where he can do as he pleases with impunity, and one for the rest of
us who have to walk the strait and narrow or risk his wrath.

>>> He is also the guy that "Middius" used to call "Tom Yutz" and
>>> "gumdrop" before Tom gave in and "joined the Normals".

>> Part of the Middius reading of "How To Win Friends And Influence
>> People". He just threatens them with humiliation until they cave in
>> to him and join him in attacking the people Middius targets.

> Yep, it worked on Tom Albertz and it worked dave Weil. Sad.

Indeed.

Then you've got guys like Richman who just help the Middiot out for the fun
of it.

[Ruud Broens]

"Ruud Broens" > wrote in message
...
:
: "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
: :
: : Complete fact.
:
: complete fact, indeed, you're non-contributions. of course, never any
substance,
: just a little scream here, a little s****** there, eh ? so , contributsions
*is*
: the
: better word for it :-)
: aaah, to see Krueger fighting it out with Google ..
: :
: : >You make no "contributions" to such threads
: :
: : Denail of reality noted. Deconstruct my contributions at your own risk,
: : Scott.
:
: a recurring Krueger theme word: risk. What risk do we actually run , Arny ?
: Is it the 'risk' of a Krueger no-show, when it's getting hot ??
: wanna do some googling on that, just recently ???
: Rudy
:
: :
.................................................. ..........no show......noted :-)

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> In >, Clyde Slick wrote :
>
>
>> Statistics lie, French statistics lie and take bribes.
>
> You should be prudent with such assertions just when the world is
> celebrating Auschwitz liberation 60th anniversary.
>
> So many revisionists would find interst in promotion of such pueril claim.

What are you babbling about now?




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Tom]

Torry-boooy the cowardly stuttering nerd postured:

> He is also the guy that "Middius" used to call "Tom Yutz" and "gumdrop"
> before Tom gave in and "joined the Normals".


I was a "yutz" at the time. I thought, like you, that George and Graham
were
over the top and I defended Arny. But Arny turned on me and bit the hand
that defended him and has subsequently demonstrated (as you have) that
he (and you) are demented, dishonest, lying individuals with no
self-respect.

So see, it had nothing to do with George.

What is it that has you hating life so much? Come on, do share.

[[email protected]]

Tom wrote:
> Torry-boooy the cowardly stuttering nerd postured:
>
> > He is also the guy that "Middius" used to call "Tom Yutz" and
"gumdrop"
> > before Tom gave in and "joined the Normals".
>
>
> I was a "yutz" at the time. I thought, like you, that George and
Graham
> were
> over the top
>
>


Your problem was according any credibility to those assholes.
>

Enjoy!

[Tom]

> wrote
>
> Your problem was according any credibility to those assholes.


u don't read gud. do you, nerd. when did the boys quit
picking on you?


Enjoy!