Re: Still Another Kwestion for the Krooborg

[[email protected]]

the psycho posting as "George M. Middius" wrote:

> unempowered nobodies hiding in their
> anonymity
>
>


Pots and kettles, anyone?

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>the psycho posting as "George M. Middius" wrote:
>
>> unempowered nobodies hiding in their
>> anonymity
>>
>>
>
>
>Pots and kettles, anyone?

Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.

Boon

[[email protected]]

Porky Phillips wrote:

> Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.
>
> Boon
>
>

What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my greenhouse....what
a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where you've been. And, this
afternoon, what do I find but a post from the RAO slug-of-slugs, the
one and only Porky Phillips. ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message


> Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for
> you?

Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply
pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to
counter.

Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella,
Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.

[Arny Krueger]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

> Richard Malesweski said:
>
>> the psycho posting as "George M. Middius" wrote:
>>
>>> unempowered nobodies hiding in their
>>> anonymity
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Pots and kettles, anyone?
>
> Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.

<nonexistent response>

[Marc Phillips]

Arny said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

>> Richard Malesweski said:
>>
>>> the psycho posting as "George M. Middius" wrote:
>>>
>>>> unempowered nobodies hiding in their
>>>> anonymity
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pots and kettles, anyone?
>>
>> Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.
>
><nonexistent response>

Whose? Yours? Make some sense for once.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>Porky Phillips wrote:
>
>> Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.
>>
>> Boon
>>
>>
>
>What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my greenhouse....what
>a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where you've been. And, this
>afternoon, what do I find but a post from the RAO slug-of-slugs, the
>one and only Porky Phillips. ;-)

You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly defeated...and
you're wondering where I've been?

LOL!

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

> Richard Malesweski said:
>
>> Porky Phillips wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.
>>>
>>> Boon
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my
>> greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where
>> you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from the
>> RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-)
>
> You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly
> defeated...and you're wondering where I've been?
>
> LOL!

Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences are part
of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or some other place
without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks. Prior to
today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005.

[Bruce J. Richman]

Arny Krueger wrote:


>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

>
>> Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for
>> you?
>
>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply
>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to
>counter.
>
>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella,
>Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>
>
>

As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, it doesn't
take long for both newbies and oldies on RAO to give Krueger the kinds of
flames he's been spreading for many years. Fella, a relative newcomer, was
just one of the latest to join the "Have You Had A Bad Krueger Experience" club
of numerous people that despise this chronic liar.



Bruce J. Richman

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>
>
> > Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles
for
> > you?
>
> Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are
simply
> pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your
abuse to
> counter.
>
>

"George" just doesn't realize what a vile asshole he is. :-0



>
> Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art,
Fella,
> Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>
>


Turds of a feather post together?

[[email protected]]

RAO's resident quack ranted:
>
> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years,
>
>


6 years????? What about all those posts where you squealed "7 year
history"?









"sockpuppet!"
"libel!"
"character assassination!"
"delusional!"
"hated and despised!"
"flamer!"
-the oft-repeated rants of Bruce J. Richman, diagnosed psychotic

[Sander deWaal]

Lionel > said:

>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005".
>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)

What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
psychologists. (=:

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Lionel]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>
>
>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

>>
>>
>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for
>>>you?
>>
>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply
>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to
>>counter.
>>
>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella,
>>Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years,

Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005".
Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)

[Lionel]

In >, Sander deWaal wrote :

> Lionel > said:
>
>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005".
>>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
>>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)
>
> What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
> AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
> psychologists. (=:

I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody has
*invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)

[Bruce J. Richman]

Lionel wrote:


>Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

>>>
>>>
>>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for
>>>>you?
>>>
>>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply
>>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to
>>>counter.
>>>
>>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella,
>>>Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years,
>
>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005".
>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)
>
>

And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France, where your
views belong. :) Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very few, and we
appreciate your keeping it that way.

Of course if there were a scatology exhibition, you might be invited to become
the keynote speaker. :)



Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

Lionel wrote:


>In >, Sander deWaal wrote :
>
>> Lionel > said:
>>
>>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005".
>>>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
>>>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)
>>
>> What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
>> AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
>> psychologists. (=:
>
>I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody has
>*invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)
>
>
>

So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either.

It's a matter of Google record that John Atkinson and his publication have
been libeled repeatedly over the years by Krueger. While only Mr. Atkinson
obviously can know why he extended the invitation, I think most of us can
pretty easily understand his motivations. :)



Bruce J. Richman

[Lionel]

In >, Bruce J. Richman wrote :

> Lionel wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for
>>>>>you?
>>>>
>>>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply
>>>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse
>>>>to counter.
>>>>
>>>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art,
>>>>Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years,
>>
>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005".
>>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
>>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)
>>
>>
>
> And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France, where your
> views belong. :) Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very few, and
> we appreciate your keeping it that way.

Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce...
"RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited to "Home
Entertainment 2005".
This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger insanity...
Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would
*publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an audio
show ?
This *invitation* gives him more credit, more attention than you never got
in all your life, Bruce. Can you understand this ? Do you really need a
little French guy coming from the sewers to explain you that ? Eh bruce ?

Now everything can happen to the show Bruce, you, Middius, Phillips,
Sackman... are already the black sheeps of the story.

You can turn it the way you want bruce, Atkinson's invitation is an implicit
desavowal to Middius' clique. And you know it... ;-)




> Of course if there were a scatology exhibition, you might be invited to
> become
> the keynote speaker. :)

[Lionel]

In >, Bruce J. Richman wrote :

> Lionel wrote:
>
>
>>In >, Sander deWaal wrote :
>>
>>> Lionel > said:
>>>
>>>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005".
>>>>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
>>>>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)
>>>
>>> What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
>>> AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
>>> psychologists. (=:
>>
>>I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody
>>has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)
>>
>>
>>
>
> So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either.

Lionel hasn't any competence to be inveited in an audio show.
Lionel doesn't want to go in USA.
Lionel want to stay in the french sewers... ;-)

[[email protected]]

Lionel wrote:
> In >, Bruce J. Richman
wrote :
>
> > Lionel wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
> >>> Arny Krueger wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles
for
> >>>>>you?
> >>>>
> >>>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are
simply
> >>>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your
abuse
> >>>>to counter.
> >>>>
> >>>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you
Art,
> >>>>Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years,
> >>
> >>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment
2005".
> >>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but
sorry
> >>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps.
;-)
> >>
> >>
> >
> > And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France,
where your
> > views belong. :) Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very
few, and
> > we appreciate your keeping it that way.
>
> Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce...
> "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited
to "Home
> Entertainment 2005".
> This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger
insanity...
> Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would
> *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an
audio
> show ?
>
>

Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided. This
must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and
groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake.





> This *invitation* gives him more credit, more attention than you
never got
> in all your life, Bruce. Can you understand this ? Do you really need
a
> little French guy coming from the sewers to explain you that ? Eh
bruce ?
>
> Now everything can happen to the show Bruce, you, Middius, Phillips,
> Sackman... are already the black sheeps of the story.
>
> You can turn it the way you want bruce, Atkinson's invitation is an
implicit
> desavowal to Middius' clique. And you know it... ;-)
>=20
>=20

Bingo!

[Lionel]

In . com>,
wrote :

>
> Lionel wrote:
>> In >, Bruce J. Richman
> wrote :
>>
>> > Lionel wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>> >>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles
> for
>> >>>>>you?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are
> simply
>> >>>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your
> abuse
>> >>>>to counter.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you
> Art,
>> >>>>Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years,
>> >>
>> >>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment
> 2005".
>> >>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but
> sorry
>> >>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps.
> ;-)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France,
> where your
>> > views belong. :) Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very
> few, and
>> > we appreciate your keeping it that way.
>>
>> Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce...
>> "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited
> to "Home
>> Entertainment 2005".
>> This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger
> insanity...
>> Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would
>> *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an
> audio
>> show ?
>>
>>
>
> Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided. This
> must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and
> groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake.

Yes a real full invitation...
Can you explain them in a good english that Mr John Atkinson as accepted to
compromise himself with a well-known pedophile...
LOL, I will not be surprised that Porky will be missing for a while...

:-D


>> This *invitation* gives him more credit, more attention than you
> never got
>> in all your life, Bruce. Can you understand this ? Do you really need
> a
>> little French guy coming from the sewers to explain you that ? Eh
> bruce ?
>>
>> Now everything can happen to the show Bruce, you, Middius, Phillips,
>> Sackman... are already the black sheeps of the story.
>>
>> You can turn it the way you want bruce, Atkinson's invitation is an
> implicit
>> desavowal to Middius' clique. And you know it... ;-)
>>
>>
>
> Bingo!

[[email protected]]

Lionel wrote:
> In . com>,
> wrote :
>
> >
> > Lionel wrote:
> >> In >, Bruce J.
Richman
> > wrote :
> >>
> >> > Lionel wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
> >> >>> Arny Krueger wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in
message
> >>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your
battles
> > for
> >> >>>>>you?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you
are
> > simply
> >> >>>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of
your
> > abuse
> >> >>>>to counter.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you
> > Art,
> >> >>>>Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6
years,
> >> >>
> >> >>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home
Entertainment
> > 2005".
> >> >>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but
> > sorry
> >> >>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time
perhaps.
> > ;-)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France,
> > where your
> >> > views belong. :) Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very
> > few, and
> >> > we appreciate your keeping it that way.
> >>
> >> Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce...
> >> "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly*
invited
> > to "Home
> >> Entertainment 2005".
> >> This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger
> > insanity...
> >> Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would
> >> *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an
> > audio
> >> show ?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided.
This
> > must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and
> > groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake.
>
> Yes a real full invitation...
> Can you explain them in a good english that Mr John Atkinson as
accepted to
> compromise himself with a well-known pedophile...
> LOL, I will not be surprised that Porky will be missing for a
while...
>
> :-D
>
>

Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky"
Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither
insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known
pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well
as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice"
for the Middius Clique! :-))

[Lionel]

In . com>,
wrote :

>
> Lionel wrote:
>> In . com>,
>> wrote :
>>
>> >
>> > Lionel wrote:
>> >> In >, Bruce J.
> Richman
>> > wrote :
>> >>
>> >> > Lionel wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>> >> >>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in
> message
>> >>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your
> battles
>> > for
>> >> >>>>>you?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you
> are
>> > simply
>> >> >>>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of
> your
>> > abuse
>> >> >>>>to counter.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you
>> > Art,
>> >> >>>>Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6
> years,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home
> Entertainment
>> > 2005".
>> >> >>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but
>> > sorry
>> >> >>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time
> perhaps.
>> > ;-)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France,
>> > where your
>> >> > views belong. :) Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very
>> > few, and
>> >> > we appreciate your keeping it that way.
>> >>
>> >> Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce...
>> >> "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly*
> invited
>> > to "Home
>> >> Entertainment 2005".
>> >> This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger
>> > insanity...
>> >> Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would
>> >> *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an
>> > audio
>> >> show ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided.
> This
>> > must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and
>> > groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake.
>>
>> Yes a real full invitation...
>> Can you explain them in a good english that Mr John Atkinson as
> accepted to
>> compromise himself with a well-known pedophile...
>> LOL, I will not be surprised that Porky will be missing for a
> while...
>>
>> :-D
>>
>>
>
> Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky"
> Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither
> insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known
> pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well
> as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice"
> for the Middius Clique! :-))

The most funny is "Doctor" Bruce Richman's deroute, for him this is
obviously a professional desavowal...
Considering his advanced senility I am sure that ridicule will not kill
him. ;-)

Sackman-the-boor also doesn't seem to understand what's happening. :o)

[Marc Phillips]

Arny said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

>> Richard Malesweski said:
>>
>>> Porky Phillips wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.
>>>>
>>>> Boon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my
>>> greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where
>>> you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from the
>>> RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-)
>>
>> You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly
>> defeated...and you're wondering where I've been?
>>
>> LOL!
>
> Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences are part
>of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or some other place
>without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks. Prior to
>today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005.

According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this ****ing
stupid.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>Lionel wrote:
>> In >, Bruce J. Richman
>wrote :
>>
>> > Lionel wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
>> >>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles
>for
>> >>>>>you?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are
>simply
>> >>>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your
>abuse
>> >>>>to counter.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you
>Art,
>> >>>>Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years,
>> >>
>> >>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment
>2005".
>> >>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but
>sorry
>> >>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps.
>;-)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France,
>where your
>> > views belong. :) Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very
>few, and
>> > we appreciate your keeping it that way.
>>
>> Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce...
>> "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited
>to "Home
>> Entertainment 2005".
>> This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger
>insanity...
>> Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would
>> *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an
>audio
>> show ?
>>
>>
>
>Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided. This
>must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and
>groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake.

Why would it stick in our craws? What the **** are you talking about, Internet
geek?

>
>
>
>
>
>> This *invitation* gives him more credit, more attention than you
>never got
>> in all your life, Bruce. Can you understand this ? Do you really need
>a
>> little French guy coming from the sewers to explain you that ? Eh
>bruce ?
>>
>> Now everything can happen to the show Bruce, you, Middius, Phillips,
>> Sackman... are already the black sheeps of the story.
>>
>> You can turn it the way you want bruce, Atkinson's invitation is an
>implicit
>> desavowal to Middius' clique. And you know it... ;-)
>>=20
>>=20
>
>Bingo!

In your fantasy world, maybe. In reality, you don't even have a game board.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>Lionel wrote:
>> In . com>,
>> wrote :
>>
>> >
>> > Lionel wrote:
>> >> In >, Bruce J.
>Richman
>> > wrote :
>> >>
>> >> > Lionel wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
>> >> >>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in
>message
>> >>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your
>battles
>> > for
>> >> >>>>>you?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you
>are
>> > simply
>> >> >>>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of
>your
>> > abuse
>> >> >>>>to counter.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you
>> > Art,
>> >> >>>>Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6
>years,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home
>Entertainment
>> > 2005".
>> >> >>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but
>> > sorry
>> >> >>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time
>perhaps.
>> > ;-)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France,
>> > where your
>> >> > views belong. :) Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very
>> > few, and
>> >> > we appreciate your keeping it that way.
>> >>
>> >> Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce...
>> >> "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly*
>invited
>> > to "Home
>> >> Entertainment 2005".
>> >> This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger
>> > insanity...
>> >> Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would
>> >> *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an
>> > audio
>> >> show ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided.
>This
>> > must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and
>> > groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake.
>>
>> Yes a real full invitation...
>> Can you explain them in a good english that Mr John Atkinson as
>accepted to
>> compromise himself with a well-known pedophile...
>> LOL, I will not be surprised that Porky will be missing for a
>while...
>>
>> :-D
>>
>>
>
>Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky"
>Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither
>insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known
>pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well
>as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice"
>for the Middius Clique! :-))

For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this conclusion. Boy,
are you desperate for attention.

Boon

[Bruce J. Richman]

Lionel displays his ignorance as follows:

>In . com>,
wrote :
>
>>
>> Lionel wrote:
>>> In . com>,
>>> wrote :
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Lionel wrote:
>>> >> In >, Bruce J.
>> Richman
>>> > wrote :
>>> >>
>>> >> > Lionel wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>>> >> >>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>>"George M. Middius" > wrote in
>> message
>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>>Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your
>> battles
>>> > for
>>> >> >>>>>you?
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you
>> are
>>> > simply
>>> >> >>>>pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of
>> your
>>> > abuse
>>> >> >>>>to counter.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you
>>> > Art,
>>> >> >>>>Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6
>> years,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home
>> Entertainment
>>> > 2005".
>>> >> >>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but
>>> > sorry
>>> >> >>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time
>> perhaps.
>>> > ;-)
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France,
>>> > where your
>>> >> > views belong. :) Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very
>>> > few, and
>>> >> > we appreciate your keeping it that way.
>>> >>
>>> >> Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce...
>>> >> "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly*
>> invited
>>> > to "Home
>>> >> Entertainment 2005".
>>> >> This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger
>>> > insanity...

Apparently, the idiot, Lionel, doesn't know the difference between "insanity"
and being despised by large group of people on RAO. As usual, he likes to
toss around terminology he can't even define, let alone use appropriately.
This comes as no surprise, of course.


>>> >> Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would
>>> >> *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an
>>> > audio
>>> >> show ?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >

Lionel's parasitic defense, and how pathetically predictable it is, of
Krueger's lengthy campaign of smearing RAO posters (one of the things that
flamer Lionel admires about Krueger) is about as lacking in logic as most of
what he writes.
Since Krueger's paranoid claims *are* oftren about Atkinson and his allleged
cliques and conspiracies (via his magazine) to attack his "scientific"
bloviations on RAO, I think it's fair to assume that Mr. Atkinson intends to
hold Krueger accountable at the Home Entertainment Show for the various
accusations (paranoid in tone) that Krueger has leveled against him and
Stereophile. It is one thing for Krueger to make all sorts of accusations on
RAO. It will be quite another for him to have to attend them in person, in a
public forum, with Mr. Atkinson present.

As usual, Lionel, just doesn't understand that people like him and his
sockpuppet buddy can't stand the light of public, in person, debate. That's
why they are confined to RAO, where their flames don't impress anybody.



>>> > Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided.
>> This
>>> > must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and
>>> > groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake.
>>>

Only in Lionel's delusion-riddled imagination. I seriously doubt that any of
the people he mentioned would have been interestred in this offer., Of course,
for Lionel, a Krueger groupie and tool, along with his sockpuppet buddy,
fantasies have to take th place of reality, since they can only make things up
ad nauseam.



>>> Yes a real full invitation...
>>> Can you explain them in a good english that Mr John Atkinson as
>> accepted to
>>> compromise himself with a well-known pedophile...
>>> LOL, I will not be surprised that Porky will be missing for a
>> while...
>>>
>>> :-D
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky"
>> Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither
>> insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known
>> pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well
>> as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice"
>> for the Middius Clique! :-))
>
>The most funny is "Doctor" Bruce Richman's deroute, for him this is
>obviously a professional desavowal...
>Considering his advanced senility I am sure that ridicule will not kill
>him. ;-)
>

Lionel's apparent delusional rage has once again interfered with his ability be
even remotely coherent. It's clear that this fool doesn't even know what
senility is, although his memory problems about Krueger and his sockpuppet
ally's history of RAO smear campaigns, certainlyu suggests he has a lot of
brain demage.
How else to explain this French idiot's failure to remember numerous facts
backed by evidence. Instead, all he seems to come up with is a series of lies
and delusional fabrications about all the folks on RAO that have exposed his
parasitic alliance with Krueger, his sockpuppet tool, and of course, his
endless stupidity.

As far as presentations at conventions go, however, I've had the opportunity to
present a research paper at a convention of the American Psychological
Associaton in New York City. The paper I I presented formed the basis of an
article that was later publised in the Journal of Coinsulting and Clinical
Psychology, a peer-reviewed. journal.

No doubt, the brain-damaged senility expert, Lionel, can give us some examples
of his scholarly writings on sewers and their contents. Or perhaps he can
explain why he tries to make RAO a virtual sewer for his debris?



>Sackman-the-boor also doesn't seem to understand what's happening. :o)
>
>
>
>
>
>


Bruce J. Richman

[[email protected]]

Is the Porkster really this stupid?? ;-)


I wrote:
> >
> >Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky"
> >Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither
> >insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known
> >pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as
well
> >as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's
Choice"
> >for the Middius Clique! :-))
>
>
>
Stupid, fat and ugly groaned:
>
>
> For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this
conclusion.
>
>


That's because you are S-T-U-P-I-D, Porky One. Go Google some of your
old posts to get a klew. ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

> Arny said:
>
>> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>>
>>> Richard Malesweski said:
>>>
>>>> Porky Phillips wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.
>>>>>
>>>>> Boon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my
>>>> greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where
>>>> you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from
>>>> the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-)
>>>
>>> You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly
>>> defeated...and you're wondering where I've been?
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>
>> Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences
>> are part of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or
>> some other place without internet service for inmates, for the past
>> two weeks. Prior to today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005.
>
> According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this
> ****ing stupid.

Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in jail, it
is you who are the stupid one. Come back when you learn how to read
properly.

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>
>> Arny said:
>>
>>> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> Richard Malesweski said:
>>>>
>>>>> Porky Phillips wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my
>>>>> greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where
>>>>> you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from
>>>>> the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly
>>>> defeated...and you're wondering where I've been?
>>>>
>>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences
>>> are part of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or
>>> some other place without internet service for inmates, for the past
>>> two weeks. Prior to today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005.
>>
>> According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this
>> ****ing stupid.
>
> Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in jail,
> it is you who are the stupid one. Come back when you learn how to read
> properly.
"According to google you've been in jail"

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>Is the Porkster really this stupid?? ;-)
>
>
>I wrote:
>> >
>> >Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky"
>> >Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither
>> >insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known
>> >pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as
>well
>> >as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's
>Choice"
>> >for the Middius Clique! :-))
>>
>>
>>
>Stupid, fat and ugly groaned:
>>
>>
>> For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this
>conclusion.
>>
>>
>
>
>That's because you are S-T-U-P-I-D, Porky One. Go Google some of your
>old posts to get a klew. ;-)

What a huge copout. The truth, Internet geek, is that none of us are having
the response that you so desperately need us to have. I suppose all these
years of defending pedophiles has warped your intelligence more than you
thought.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Arny said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

>> Arny said:
>>
>>> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> Richard Malesweski said:
>>>>
>>>>> Porky Phillips wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my
>>>>> greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where
>>>>> you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from
>>>>> the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly
>>>> defeated...and you're wondering where I've been?
>>>>
>>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences
>>> are part of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or
>>> some other place without internet service for inmates, for the past
>>> two weeks. Prior to today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005.
>>
>> According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this
>> ****ing stupid.
>
>Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in jail, it
>is you who are the stupid one. Come back when you learn how to read
>properly.

Hmmm. Up above, you said "according to google you've been in jail." Are you
quibbling over the capitalization, you incredible moron?

Boon

[Lionel]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

> Apparently, the idiot, Lionel, doesn't know the difference between "insanity"
> and being despised by large group of people on RAO.

Few weeks ago I have given you the possibility to explain your repeated
misuse of the term "insane" (7 years of Google archives available)... No
answer ! :-)

> As usual, he likes to
> toss around terminology he can't even define, let alone use appropriately.
> This comes as no surprise, of course.


LOL !


> Lionel's parasitic defense, and how pathetically predictable it is, of
> Krueger's lengthy campaign of smearing RAO posters (one of the things that
> flamer Lionel admires about Krueger) is about as lacking in logic as most of
> what he writes.
> Since Krueger's paranoid claims *are* oftren about Atkinson and his allleged
> cliques and conspiracies (via his magazine) to attack his "scientific"
> bloviations on RAO, I think it's fair to assume that Mr. Atkinson intends to
> hold Krueger accountable at the Home Entertainment Show for the various
> accusations (paranoid in tone)

Why do you *suddenly* feel obliged to add "in tone". Usually you don't
take so much precautions... (7 years of Google archives available)

> that Krueger has leveled against him and
> Stereophile. It is one thing for Krueger to make all sorts of accusations on
> RAO. It will be quite another for him to have to attend them in person, in a
> public forum, with Mr. Atkinson present.

I'm afraid that you don't understand Mr. Atkinson's goal.

From you to me I find that your above explanations of Mr. Atkinson's
motivations insulting for him and for the audio lovers who are
interested in their debate.
Such petty and miserable considerations surely explain why I meet you so
often in my sewers.

LOL!!!.

[Lionel]

Marc Phillips a écrit :

> Boy, are you desperate for attention.

Perhaps but I still haven't written the 1000 of messages you have
written about Krueger's alleged pedophilia... (Google archives available)
Who is desperate for attention ? Eh Mr Phillips ?

;-)

[Lionel]

Marc Phillips a écrit :
> I suppose all these years of defending pedophiles has warped your intelligence more than you
> thought.

Unfortunatly for your I suspect the same effect on the accusers'
intelligence. ;-)

[Lionel_Chapuis]

George M. Middius wrote:


> Did Thing really say that? Sounds like he thinks Krooger should be honored
> by the invitation. That would be similar to saying the missionary is the
> guest of honor at a cannibals' feast. ;-)

"Cannibal" ?
LOL, I'm sure Mr Atkinson will appreciate the comparison !




----------
Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message

> Calling Thing! Calling Oobie the Boobie! Calling duh-Mikey and Slut!

> Earlier today, Arny Krueber said this:
>>>> According to google you've been in jail or some other place
>>>> without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks.
>>>> Prior to oday, you made your last post on 1/11/2005.

> That was in message >.

Right, and once I corrected the bogus quoting, my statement stands as
written.

Or perhaps Middius, you are unaware of the meaning of the word "or"?

Here is some helpful information:

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=or&x=11&y=10

Main Entry: 1or
Pronunciation: &r, 'or, Southern also 'är
Function: conjunction
Etymology: Middle English, alter. of other, alteration of Old English
oththe; akin to Old High German eddo or
1 -- used as a function word to indicate an alternative <coffee or
tea> <sink or swim>, the equivalent or substitutive character of two words
or phrases <lessen or abate>, or approximation or uncertainty <in five or
six days>
2 archaic : EITHER
3 archaic : WHETHER
4 -- used in logic as a sentential connective that forms a complex
sentence which is true when at least one of its constituent sentences is
true; compare DISJUNCTION

>>> Marc said:
>>> According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this
>>> ****ing stupid.

> Now Arny tries to Marc Phillips' broken record straight:

>> Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in
>> jail,

> Somebody needs to push the Krooborg's reset button. The "debating
> trade" is even more fecal than usual. ;-)

Fecal obsession and creative editing noted.

[Arny Krueger]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message


> Richard Malesweski said:

>> Is the Porkster really this stupid?? ;-)

>> I wrote:

>>>> Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky"
>>>> Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is
>>>> neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a
>>>> known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to
>>>> perform, as well
>>>> as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice"
>>>> for the Middius Clique! :-))

It's an interesting twist of fate how Atkinson has set up the *Normals* to
take a fall.

>> Stupid, fat and ugly groaned:

>>> For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this
>> conclusion.

Well Marc, inability to reach a logical conclusion like this is completely
in character for a bozo like you who just showed that he doesn't know the
meaning of the word "or".

>> That's because you are S-T-U-P-I-D, Porky One. Go Google some of your
>> old posts to get a klew. ;-)

Yup, it seems like the *Normals* live on a steady diet of stupid pills. This
conclusion is inescapable to anybody who has watched their antics here over
the past several years. For example, we've got Richman who can't tell the
difference between six years or seven years, Marc Phillips and Middius who
don't understand the meaning of the word *or*, and Art Sackman whose idea of
a cogent post is to repost the post he's replying to three times in a row,
completely unaltered.

> What a huge copout. The truth, Internet geek, is that none of us are
> having the response that you so desperately need us to have.

I dunno, Phillips tricking you into exposing your manifold stupidity seems
like a worthwhile response for us to elicit from you.

> I suppose all these years of defending pedophiles has warped your
> intelligence more than you thought.

It's true Phililips that dealing with your mindless numbing stupididity has
not left us unphased. However, given how polluted and senseless most of your
posts are, we're doing pretty good,.

[Ruud Broens]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
: "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
:
: > Calling Thing! Calling Oobie the Boobie! Calling duh-Mikey and Slut!
:
: > Earlier today, Arny Krueber said this:
: >>>> According to google you've been in jail or some other place
: >>>> without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks.
: >>>> Prior to oday, you made your last post on 1/11/2005.
:
: > That was in message >.
:
: Right, and once I corrected the bogus quoting, my statement stands as
: written.
:
: Or perhaps Middius, you are unaware of the meaning of the word "or"?
:
: Here is some helpful information:
:
: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=or&x=11&y=10
:
: Main Entry: 1or
: Pronunciation: &r, 'or, Southern also 'är
: Function: conjunction
: Etymology: Middle English, alter. of other, alteration of Old English
: oththe; akin to Old High German eddo or
: 1 -- used as a function word to indicate an alternative <coffee or
: tea> <sink or swim>, the equivalent or substitutive character of two words
: or phrases <lessen or abate>, or approximation or uncertainty <in five or
: six days>
: 2 archaic : EITHER
: 3 archaic : WHETHER
: 4 -- used in logic as a sentential connective that forms a complex
: sentence which is true when at least one of its constituent sentences is
: true; compare DISJUNCTION
:
: >>> Marc said:
: >>> According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this
: >>> ****ing stupid.
:
: > Now Arny tries to Marc Phillips' broken record straight:
:
: >> Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in
: >> jail,
:
: > Somebody needs to push the Krooborg's reset button. The "debating
: > trade" is even more fecal than usual. ;-)
:
: Fecal obsession and creative editing noted.
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
: : : :
Here's some helpful information, part 2, Krueger:

if clause 1 of your OR statement is false, you therefore claim this to be true:
"some other place without internet service for inmates"

care to show the "Google evidence" , mate ?
Rudy

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
>
> Or perhaps Middius, you are unaware of the meaning of the word "or"?
>

Arny, you have been ****ing little kiddie boys in the ass again, or you have
been locked up in some place without internet service for inmates.

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>
>
> > Richard Malesweski said:
>
> >> Is the Porkster really this stupid?? ;-)
>
> >> I wrote:
>
> >>>> Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky"
> >>>> Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is
> >>>> neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting
a
> >>>> known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to
> >>>> perform, as well
> >>>> as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's
Choice"
> >>>> for the Middius Clique! :-))
>
> It's an interesting twist of fate how Atkinson has set up the
*Normals* to
> take a fall.
>
>
>

Yep, the "Normals" can have it one way, or they can have it the other
way. This is the funniest thing on RAO since Singh jumped off the lap
of "George M. Middius" and started nipping at his ankles. That was
followed, of course, by "George" accusing Singh of having sexual
relations with his mother. That was fun to watch.

>
>
> >> Stupid, fat and ugly groaned:
>
> >>> For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this
> >> conclusion.
>
> Well Marc, inability to reach a logical conclusion like this is
completely
> in character for a bozo like you who just showed that he doesn't know
the
> meaning of the word "or".
>
>
>


Even Porky can't be *this* stupid.....I think he's just in denial. ;-)

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :


> Arny, you have been ****ing little kiddie boys in the ass again,

Oh, oh it seems that Sackman this old repressed pederast want to share
his sexual experiences with us. :-(

[Lionel]

a écrit :

> ...That was followed, of course, by "George" accusing Singh of having sexual
> relations with his mother.

I suspect that the whole "Middius' mystery" find its explanation in the
above accusation.

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick a écrit :
>
>
>> Arny, you have been ****ing little kiddie boys in the ass again,
>
> Oh, oh it seems that Sackman this old repressed pederast want to share his
> sexual experiences with us. :-(

If one wants to teach Arny an English lesson, one has
to give examples relevant to his real life experiences.

[[email protected]]

Lionel wrote:
> a =E9crit :
>
> > ...That was followed, of course, by "George" accusing Singh of
having sexual
> > relations with his mother.
>
> I suspect that the whole "Middius' mystery" find its explanation in
the
> above accusation.
>
>


Apparently, "Middius" is proud to have been called a misogynist (or
"mysogenist" in Middius-ese) by Jim Johnston (aka, JJ). I wonder what
horrors "Ma Middius" inflicted on "George". Did she merely beat him? Or
did she make him play "doctor" and/or "daddy"?

[Lionel]

Fella a écrit :
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>>
>> Calling Thing! Calling Oobie the Boobie! Calling duh-Mikey and Slut!
>>
>> Earlier today, ****-for-Brains said this:
>>
>>>>> According to google you've been in jail
>>
>>
>> That was in message >.
>>
>> Marc said:
>>
>>>> According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this
>>>> ****ing stupid.
>>
>>
>>
>> Now Mr. **** pukes up his own feces:
>>
>>> Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in
>>> jail,
>>
>>
>>
>> Somebody needs to push the Krooborg's reset button. The "debating trade"
>> is even more fecal than usual. ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>
> Damn, this was the greatest! LOL!

Beaucoup de bruit pour une conjonction de coordination.
Aren't you afraid to participate to a grotesque joke ?

[Lionel]

In >, Fella wrote :

> Lionel wrote:
>
>> In >, Bruce J. Richman wrote
>> :
>>
>>
>>>Lionel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>In >, Sander deWaal wrote :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Lionel > said:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment
>>>>>>2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce,
>>>>>>but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time
>>>>>>perhaps. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
>>>>>AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
>>>>>psychologists. (=:
>>>>
>>>>I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody
>>>>has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either.
>>
>>
>> Lionel hasn't any competence to be inveited in an audio show.
>
> Neither does the kroog... Hence the invitation! :)

This is also what Middius says. OTOH I never read something pertinent about
audio coming Middius...
I'm perplexed. ;-)

[Fella]

George M. Middius wrote:
>
> Calling Thing! Calling Oobie the Boobie! Calling duh-Mikey and Slut!
>
> Earlier today, ****-for-Brains said this:
>
>>>>According to google you've been in jail
>
> That was in message >.
>
> Marc said:
>
>>>According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this
>>>****ing stupid.
>
>
> Now Mr. **** pukes up his own feces:
>
>>Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in jail,
>
>
> Somebody needs to push the Krooborg's reset button. The "debating trade"
> is even more fecal than usual. ;-)
>
>
>

Damn, this was the greatest! LOL!

[Fella]

Lionel wrote:

> In >, Bruce J. Richman wrote :
>
>
>>Lionel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>In >, Sander deWaal wrote :
>>>
>>>
>>>>Lionel > said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005".
>>>>>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
>>>>>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
>>>>AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
>>>>psychologists. (=:
>>>
>>>I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody
>>>has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either.
>
>
> Lionel hasn't any competence to be inveited in an audio show.

Neither does the kroog... Hence the invitation! :)

[Bruce J. Richman]

Fella wrote:


>Lionel wrote:
>
>> In >, Bruce J. Richman wrote :
>>
>>
>>>Lionel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>In >, Sander deWaal wrote :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Lionel > said:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005".
>>>>>>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
>>>>>>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
>>>>>AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
>>>>>psychologists. (=:
>>>>
>>>>I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody
>>>>has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either.
>>
>>
>> Lionel hasn't any competence to be inveited in an audio show.
>
>Neither does the kroog... Hence the invitation! :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Lionel;s just upset that since he's widely known to be Krueger's
not-yet-housebroken (but sewer-broken) French poodle, he wasn't invited under
the "pet" category to accompany Krueger. He thought all that yelping and
squealing about Krueger's enemies would get him more than some free
doggie-sound-cards to play with.



Bruce J. Richman

[Tom]

Torry-boooy wrote:

>.............I wonder what horrors "Ma Middius" inflicted on "George".
> Did she merely beat him? Or did she make him play "doctor"
> and/or "daddy"?

You didn't handle being a nerd very well, did you? There must have
been a lot of pain.

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
oups.com

> Apparently, "Middius" is proud to have been called a misogynist (or
> "mysogenist" in Middius-ese) by Jim Johnston (aka, JJ).

That has to do with Middius' convictions for abusing women, or so the story
goes.

> I wonder what
> horrors "Ma Middius" inflicted on "George". Did she merely beat him?

No, George's daddy beat him. His mother's sin was not defending him, or so
the story goes.

[[email protected]]

Tom "taken in at my wife's firm" Albertz" wrote:

> There must have
> been a lot of pain.

>
>

When you had to resign yourself to taking a position at your wife's
firm?
Find Tom Albertz at "The Group" in Fort Collins, Colorado. Google it!

[Marc Phillips]

Arny said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

>
>> Richard Malesweski said:
>
>>> Is the Porkster really this stupid?? ;-)
>
>>> I wrote:
>
>>>>> Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky"
>>>>> Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is
>>>>> neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a
>>>>> known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to
>>>>> perform, as well
>>>>> as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice"
>>>>> for the Middius Clique! :-))
>
>It's an interesting twist of fate how Atkinson has set up the *Normals* to
>take a fall.
>
>>> Stupid, fat and ugly groaned:
>
>>>> For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this
>>> conclusion.
>
>Well Marc, inability to reach a logical conclusion like this is completely
>in character for a bozo like you who just showed that he doesn't know the
>meaning of the word "or".
>
>>> That's because you are S-T-U-P-I-D, Porky One. Go Google some of your
>>> old posts to get a klew. ;-)
>
>Yup, it seems like the *Normals* live on a steady diet of stupid pills. This
>conclusion is inescapable to anybody who has watched their antics here over
>the past several years. For example, we've got Richman who can't tell the
>difference between six years or seven years, Marc Phillips and Middius who
>don't understand the meaning of the word *or*, and Art Sackman whose idea of
>a cogent post is to repost the post he's replying to three times in a row,
>completely unaltered.
>
>> What a huge copout. The truth, Internet geek, is that none of us are
>> having the response that you so desperately need us to have.
>
>I dunno, Phillips tricking you into exposing your manifold stupidity seems
>like a worthwhile response for us to elicit from you.
>
>> I suppose all these years of defending pedophiles has warped your
>> intelligence more than you thought.
>
>It's true Phililips that dealing with your mindless numbing stupididity has
>not left us unphased. However, given how polluted and senseless most of your
>posts are, we're doing pretty good,.

Jesus Christ, I don't know where to begin addressing your stupidity. It's too
pervasive, too profound.

Boon

[Lionel]

a écrit :
> Tom "taken in at my wife's firm" Albertz" wrote:
>
>
>>There must have
>>been a lot of pain.
>
>
>>
>
> When you had to resign yourself to taking a position at your wife's
> firm?
> Find Tom Albertz at "The Group" in Fort Collins, Colorado. Google it!

He doesn't look to a "Boston Snake" at the RAO's diner :
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/ces2001/monday/rao2.jpg
I guess that the snake is sleeping inside.

But where is George M. Middius ? Did someone already meet him ?

[[email protected]]

Lionel wrote:
> a =E9crit :
> > Tom "taken in at my wife's firm" Albertz" wrote:
> >
> >
> >>There must have
> >>been a lot of pain.
> >
> >
> >>
> >
> > When you had to resign yourself to taking a position at your wife's
> > firm?
> > Find Tom Albertz at "The Group" in Fort Collins, Colorado. Google
it!
>
> He doesn't look to a "Boston Snake" at the RAO's diner :
> http://www.enjoythemusic.com/ces2001/monday/rao2.jpg
> I guess that the snake is sleeping inside.
>
>
That picture was taken in 2001, before Tom Albertz went over the edge.
It was in the summer of 2002 that Albertz truly went off the deep end
and starting sending forged emails posing as both "George M. Middius"
and another nutcase named Jamie Benchimol. He also made many forged
posts under many different nyms. It looks like the long stretch of
unemployment made him a wee bit nuts; that may be why his wife, Kathy
Albertz, finally took him in at her firm. IMO, Tom still isn't quite
right in the head; perhaps it's the utter humiliation of working for
his wife that drives him nuts.
>
>
> But where is George M. Middius ? Did someone already meet him ?
>
>

*No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky" Singh did
have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said was a
bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had the
goods sent to a PO Box.

[Fella]

Lionel wrote:

> In >, Fella wrote :
>
>
>>Lionel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In >, Bruce J. Richman wrote
>>>:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Lionel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In >, Sander deWaal wrote :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Lionel > said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment
>>>>>>>2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce,
>>>>>>>but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time
>>>>>>>perhaps. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
>>>>>>AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
>>>>>>psychologists. (=:
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody
>>>>>has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either.
>>>
>>>
>>>Lionel hasn't any competence to be inveited in an audio show.
>>
>>Neither does the kroog... Hence the invitation! :)
>
>
> This is also what Middius says.


I think JA's intention is to put a lid on it once and for all, but, most
probably it will backfire.

> OTOH I never read something pertinent about
> audio coming Middius...

No comprendo on this one.

[[email protected]]

George M. Middius wrote:
> > Fella said:
>
> > >Lionel wrote:
>
> > > OTOH I never read something pertinent about
> > > audio coming Middius...
> >
> > No comprendo on this one.
>
> Lionella sounds like the pre-adolescent twerp who gets his kicks by
eating
> dirt and peeping at the little girls' underwear.
>
>

Aren't you fearful of the biting wit and raging wrath of "George M.
Middius", Lionel? Mock him at your peril! ;-)

[Tom]

You realize, mr shapwee, that your chicken**** little buddy mixes
mostly lies and conjecture with an occasional truth. I'm more than a
little surprised by your friendship with him. He is a classic nerd.
He's incapable of normal conversation or humor - so completely consumed
with anger and venom. He's really angry with me and yet so impotent.
He needs to make things up.

It is fact that Jamie Benchimol was a nutcase. I did pretend to be
George in several emails with him. Boy was that a hoot. Did
Torry-boooy tell you that the nutcase Jamie Benchimol was one of his
friends?

[Tom]

> I guess that the snake is sleeping inside.

or perhaps "the snake" is another one. Many are repulsed by the antics
of your nerdy little buddy. ;-)

[Lionel]

Fella a écrit :
> Lionel wrote:
>
>> In >, Fella wrote :
>>
>>
>>> Lionel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> In >, Bruce J. Richman
>>>> wrote
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Lionel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> In >, Sander deWaal
>>>>>> wrote :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lionel > said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment
>>>>>>>> 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce,
>>>>>>>> but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time
>>>>>>>> perhaps. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
>>>>>>> AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
>>>>>>> psychologists. (=:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that
>>>>>> nobody
>>>>>> has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lionel hasn't any competence to be inveited in an audio show.
>>>
>>>
>>> Neither does the kroog... Hence the invitation! :)
>>
>>
>>
>> This is also what Middius says.
>
>
>
> I think JA's intention is to put a lid on it once and for all, but, most
> probably it will backfire.
>
>> OTOH I never read something pertinent about
>> audio coming Middius...
>
>
> No comprendo on this one.


If you refuse any effort I cannot believe that you are a music lover. ;-)

[Lionel]

a écrit :
> George M. Middius wrote:
>
>>>Fella said:
>>
>>>>Lionel wrote:
>>
>>>>OTOH I never read something pertinent about
>>>>audio coming Middius...
>>>
>>>No comprendo on this one.
>>
>>Lionella sounds like the pre-adolescent twerp who gets his kicks by
>
> eating
>
>>dirt and peeping at the little girls' underwear.
>>
>>
>
>
> Aren't you fearful of the biting wit and raging wrath of "George M.
> Middius", Lionel? Mock him at your peril! ;-)

I am always destroyed, annihilate, atomized by the force of Middius' wit...
At least ten times a day ! :-)

[Lionel]

Tom a écrit :

> He's incapable of normal conversation or humor

That's not true.

> - so completely consumed
> with anger and venom.

Venom ? Have you already bitten him ? :-)

> He's really angry with me and yet so impotent.
> He needs to make things up.

You have a life ? So I guess that you don't really care.

> It is fact that Jamie Benchimol was a nutcase. I did pretend to be
> George in several emails with him. Boy was that a hoot. Did
> Torry-boooy tell you that the nutcase Jamie Benchimol was one of his
> friends?

[Tom]

>> He's incapable of normal conversation or humor
>That's not true.

Can you show an example of this?


>You have a life ? So I guess that you don't really care.
Don't tell him that.

[Clyde Slick]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
Lionel wrote:
>

*No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky" Singh did
have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said was a
bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had the
goods sent to a PO Box.


Not even his employer?

[[email protected]]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> Lionel wrote:
> >
>
> *No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky" Singh
did
> have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said was
a
> bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had the
> goods sent to a PO Box.
>
>
> Not even his employer?
>
>


Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M. Middius" on
them. ;-)

[Clyde Slick]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> Lionel wrote:
>> >
>>
>> *No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky" Singh
> did
>> have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said was
> a
>> bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had the
>> goods sent to a PO Box.
>>
>>
>> Not even his employer?
>>
>>
>
>
> Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M. Middius" on
> them. ;-)


would they say Tor Resists?

[[email protected]]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > Clyde Slick wrote:
> >> > wrote in message
> >> oups.com...
> >> Lionel wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> >> *No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky" Singh
> > did
> >> have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said
was
> > a
> >> bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had
the
> >> goods sent to a PO Box.
> >>
> >>
> >> Not even his employer?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M. Middius"
on
> > them. ;-)
>
>
> would they say Tor Resists?
>
>

No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are you
agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?

[Ruud Broens]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Clyde Slick wrote:
: > > wrote in message
: > oups.com...
: > >
: > > Clyde Slick wrote:
: > >> > wrote in message
: > >> oups.com...
: > >> Lionel wrote:
: > >> >
: > >>
: > >> *No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky" Singh
: > > did
: > >> have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said
: was
: > > a
: > >> bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had
: the
: > >> goods sent to a PO Box.
: > >>
: > >>
: > >> Not even his employer?
: > >>
: > >>
: > >
: > >
: > > Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M. Middius"
: on
: > > them. ;-)
: >
: >
: > would they say Tor Resists?
: >
: >
:
: No, but Tor isn't pretending that is *his "real" name, is he? Are you
: agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?


*So you could be Sort a Sister ...Postal Money Order ... he, you work
in mail sorting ? The guy who is s******ing when writing obnoxiae on mail
boxes ? Could be.

Rudy

[[email protected]]

Ruud Broens wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> :
> : Clyde Slick wrote:
> : > > wrote in message
> : > oups.com...
> : > >
> : > > Clyde Slick wrote:
> : > >> > wrote in message
> : > >> oups.com...
> : > >> Lionel wrote:
> : > >> >
> : > >>
> : > >> *No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky"
Singh
> : > > did
> : > >> have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh
said
> : was
> : > > a
> : > >> bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and
had
> : the
> : > >> goods sent to a PO Box.
> : > >>
> : > >>
> : > >> Not even his employer?
> : > >>
> : > >>
> : > >
> : > >
> : > > Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M.
Middius"
> : on
> : > > them. ;-)
> : >
> : >
> : > would they say Tor Resists?
> : >
> : >
> :
> : No, but Tor isn't pretending that is *his "real" name, is he? Are
you
> : agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?
>
>
> *So you could be Sort a Sister ...Postal Money Order ... he, you
work
> in mail sorting ? The guy who is s******ing when writing obnoxiae on
mail
> boxes ? Could be.
>


Opiates, Rudy? Enjoy your pipe dreams!

[Ruud Broens]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
: > > wrote in message
: > oups.com...
: > :
: > : Clyde Slick wrote:
: > : > > wrote in message
: > : > oups.com...
: > : > >
: > : > > Clyde Slick wrote:
: > : > >> > wrote in message
: > : > >> oups.com...
: > : > >> Lionel wrote:
: > : > >> >
: > : > >>
: > : > >> *No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky"
: Singh
: > : > > did
: > : > >> have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh
: said
: > : was
: > : > > a
: > : > >> bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and
: had
: > : the
: > : > >> goods sent to a PO Box.
: > : > >>
: > : > >>
: > : > >> Not even his employer?
: > : > >>
: > : > >>
: > : > >
: > : > >
: > : > > Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M.
: Middius"
: > : on
: > : > > them. ;-)
: > : >
: > : >
: > : > would they say Tor Resists?
: > : >
: > : >
: > :
: > : No, but Tor isn't pretending that is *his "real" name, is he? Are
: you
: > : agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?
: >
: >
: > *So you could be Sort a Sister ...Postal Money Order ... he, you
: work
: > in mail sorting ? The guy who is s******ing when writing obnoxiae on
: mail
: > boxes ? Could be.
: >
:
:
: Opiates, Rudy? Enjoy your pipe dreams!

Naaah, that's that other guy, the plumber, who lays pipe. Do *that* enough,
might get you dreamin' about it.

[Lionel]

a écrit :
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>
> wrote in message
oups.com...
>>
>>>Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>
> wrote in message
oups.com...
>>>>Lionel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>*No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky" Singh
>>>
>>>did
>>>
>>>>have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said
>
> was
>
>>>a
>>>
>>>>bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had
>
> the
>
>>>>goods sent to a PO Box.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Not even his employer?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M. Middius"
>
> on
>
>>>them. ;-)
>>
>>
>>would they say Tor Resists?
>>
>>
>
>
> No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are you
> agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?

Considering Sackman's idolatry for "George M. Middius" I suggest that
you spare him some cruel details of the reality. ;-)

[Clyde Slick]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> >
>> > Clyde Slick wrote:
>> >> > wrote in message
>> >> oups.com...
>> >> Lionel wrote:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> *No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky" Singh
>> > did
>> >> have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said
> was
>> > a
>> >> bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had
> the
>> >> goods sent to a PO Box.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Not even his employer?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M. Middius"
> on
>> > them. ;-)
>>
>>
>> would they say Tor Resists?
>>
>>
>
> No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are you
> agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?


No, but if you are right, there really is no difference, neither one of you
are revealing your identity.

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>
> Considering Sackman's idolatry for "George M. Middius" I suggest that you
> spare him some cruel details of the reality. ;-)

Its just that I find him far more humorous and entertaining than you.
And I can understand what he says.

[Ruud Broens]

"Ruud Broens" > wrote in message
...
:
: > wrote in message
: oups.com...

: : > : agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?
: : >
: : >
: : > *So you could be Sort a Sister ...Postal Money Order ... he, you
: : work
: : > in mail sorting ? The guy who is s******ing when writing obnoxiae on
: : mail
: : > boxes ? Could be.
: : >
: :
: :
: : Opiates, Rudy? Enjoy your pipe dreams!
:
: Naaah, that's that other guy, the plumber, who lays pipe. Do *that* enough,
: might get you dreamin' about it.
:
Oh, and thanks for the offer, but no thanks. I can see why you'd be needing
anonymity, with the controlled substance selling on newsgroups and all..
cheers,
Rudy

[[email protected]]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > Clyde Slick wrote:
> >> > wrote in message
> >> oups.com...
> >> >
> >> > Clyde Slick wrote:
> >> >> > wrote in message
> >> >> oups.com...
> >> >> Lionel wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> *No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky"
Singh
> >> > did
> >> >> have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh
said
> > was
> >> > a
> >> >> bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and
had
> > the
> >> >> goods sent to a PO Box.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Not even his employer?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M.
Middius"
> > on
> >> > them. ;-)
> >>
> >>
> >> would they say Tor Resists?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are
you
> > agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?
>
>
> No, but if you are right, there really is no difference, neither one
of you
> are revealing your identity.
>
>


You're being to see the light, Art.

Now, what do you think when "George" starts squawking "YACA",
"anonymous ______", etc. Is "George" being a hypocrite, or is he being
a bald-faced liar for maintaining the myth that "George M. Middius" is
his real name?

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Considering Sackman's idolatry for "George M. Middius" I suggest that you
>>spare him some cruel details of the reality. ;-)
>
>
> Its just that I find him far more humorous and entertaining than you.
> And I can understand what he says.

LOL, considering how stupid you are, Sackman, this not flattering for
him. :-D

[Lionel_Chapuis]

George M. Middius wrote:

>
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > would they say Tor Resists?
>
> Isn't Thing a professional masturbator? I assume in that occupation, the
> pay is always cash.

Is this the kind of contract you have with Sackman ? ;-)




----------
Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals

[Sander deWaal]

said:

>No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are you
>agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?

Did Middius ever deny that it might be a pseudonym?

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[[email protected]]

Sander deWaal wrote:
> said:
>
> >No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are you
> >agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?
>
> Did Middius ever deny that it might be a pseudonym?
>
>



Early and often, Sander.

[Lionel]

Sander deWaal a écrit :
> said:
>
>
>>No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are you
>>agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?
>
>
> Did Middius ever deny that it might be a pseudonym?

This kind of pseudonyms with latin consonance are often synonyms of
pompousness and ridicule. Diafoirus and Middius are the best examples I
know. ;-)

[[email protected]]

Paul Dormer wrote:
> " emitted :
>
> >Greg "Trotsky" Singh did
> >have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said
was a
> >bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had
the
> >goods sent to a PO Box.
>
> You're talking about the Lexicon he bought aren't you?
>
>

Now that you mention it, that does sound familiar.



> IIRC payment
> was made by credit card.
>
>
>

Perhaps you can get Singh to come here and reveal the details now that
he is firmly out of the "Middius" thrall?

[Sander deWaal]

Paul Dormer > said:

>>Greg "Trotsky" Singh did
>>have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh said was a
>>bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and had the
>>goods sent to a PO Box.

>You're talking about the Lexicon he bought aren't you? IIRC payment
>was made by credit card.


How do *you* know, capt. Peacock? ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Sander deWaal]

Paul Dormer > said:

>Hows' the weather over there Rudy?


Rudy is just a relay, you will note.
One with broken contacts, however ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Lionel_Chapuis]

George M. Middius wrote:

> More important, why is Thing so obsessed
> with me?

Because you are a monster George. You are an anomally, a fantasy of mother nature, a genetical heresy !

We come on RAO to watch you gesticulating, imprecating...
Incredulously we daily try to sound the depth of your stupidity, of your megalomania and your ****tyness...
*You* are the spectacle George, take care of your health. ;-)




----------
Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals

[Ruud Broens]

"Paul Dormer" > wrote in message
...
: "George M. Middius" emitted :
:
: >> >> You're talking about the Lexicon he bought aren't you? IIRC payment
: >> >> was made by credit card.
: >> >
: >> >How did you know that?
: >>
: >> You told me :-)
: >
: >Well then, how did I know it? Who told me?
:
: The fairies?
:
: >> >Christ. More important, why is Thing so obsessed with me?
: >>
: >> Oh... he's just having "fun" ;-)
: >
: >"Fun"? Oh, you must mean the way Krooger has "fun" on Usenet. ;-)
:
: "Horses for courses".. ;-)
:
:
: S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
: -----------------------------------
: It's Grim down south..

...or is it Rodney, again ? ;-)

[Ruud Broens]

wrote in message
...
:
:
:
:
:
: ----------
: Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals
:
ehh, also spraci zarathuesday ??

[Clyde Slick]

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> >
>> > Clyde Slick wrote:
>> >> > wrote in message
>> >> oups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > Clyde Slick wrote:
>> >> >> > wrote in message
>> >> >> oups.com...
>> >> >> Lionel wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *No one* has ever met "George" in person. ;-) Greg "Trotsky"
> Singh
>> >> > did
>> >> >> have a business transaction with "George" which, IIRC, Singh
> said
>> > was
>> >> > a
>> >> >> bit strange. "George" probably paid by Postal Money Order and
> had
>> > the
>> >> >> goods sent to a PO Box.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Not even his employer?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Betcha neither the paychecks nor the W-2s say "George M.
> Middius"
>> > on
>> >> > them. ;-)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> would they say Tor Resists?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are
> you
>> > agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?
>>
>>
>> No, but if you are right, there really is no difference, neither one
> of you
>> are revealing your identity.
>>
>>
>
>
> You're being to see the light, Art.
>
> Now, what do you think when "George" starts squawking "YACA",
> "anonymous ______", etc. Is "George" being a hypocrite, or is he being
> a bald-faced liar for maintaining the myth that "George M. Middius" is
> his real name?
>



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> >
>> >
>> > No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are
> you
>> > agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a pseudonym?
>>
>>
>> No, but if you are right, there really is no difference, neither one
> of you
>> are revealing your identity.
>>
>>
>
>
> You're being to see the light, Art.
>
> Now, what do you think when "George" starts squawking "YACA",
> "anonymous ______", etc. Is "George" being a hypocrite, or is he being
> a bald-faced liar for maintaining the myth that "George M. Middius" is
> his real name?


I am assuming that George is George.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick a écrit :
>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>Considering Sackman's idolatry for "George M. Middius" I suggest that you
>>>spare him some cruel details of the reality. ;-)
>>
>>
>> Its just that I find him far more humorous and entertaining than you.
>> And I can understand what he says.
>
> LOL, considering how stupid you are, Sackman, this not flattering for him.
> :-D


If you think 'you' are flattered, more power to you.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[[email protected]]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >> Clyde Slick wrote:
> >> > wrote in message
> >> oups.com...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are
> > you
> >> > agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a
pseudonym?
> >>
> >>
> >> No, but if you are right, there really is no difference, neither
one
> > of you
> >> are revealing your identity.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > You're being to see the light, Art.
> >
> > Now, what do you think when "George" starts squawking "YACA",
> > "anonymous ______", etc. Is "George" being a hypocrite, or is he
being
> > a bald-faced liar for maintaining the myth that "George M. Middius"
is
> > his real name?
>
>
> I am assuming that George is George.
>
>
>
'Cuz you are incredibly stupid/naive?? Or just down home gullible? ;-)

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :

> I am assuming that George is George.

And you are also assuming that you are a princess ? :-D

# noun: Christian martyr; patron saint of England; hero of the legend
of Saint George and the Dragon in which he slew a dragon and saved a
princess.

[Clyde Slick]

wrote in message
...
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals
>

Agreed.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

wrote in message
...
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------
> Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals
>

I disagree



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> ups.com...
>> >> Clyde Slick wrote:
>> >> > wrote in message
>> >> oups.com...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > No, but Tor isn't pretending that is his "real" name, is he? Are
>> > you
>> >> > agreeing with my premise that "George M. Middius" is a
> pseudonym?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> No, but if you are right, there really is no difference, neither
> one
>> > of you
>> >> are revealing your identity.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > You're being to see the light, Art.
>> >
>> > Now, what do you think when "George" starts squawking "YACA",
>> > "anonymous ______", etc. Is "George" being a hypocrite, or is he
> being
>> > a bald-faced liar for maintaining the myth that "George M. Middius"
> is
>> > his real name?
>>
>>
>> I am assuming that George is George.
>>
>>
>>
> 'Cuz you are incredibly stupid/naive?? Or just down home gullible? ;-)
>

No one has showed him to be anyone else.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :

> Agreed.

Normal it's blank, like you opinions. ;-)

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick a écrit :
>
>> I am assuming that George is George.
>
> And you are also assuming that you are a princess ? :-D
>
> # noun: Christian martyr; patron saint of England; hero of the legend of
> Saint George and the Dragon in which he slew a dragon and saved a
> princess.

Lionel, you are but merely one of my failed knights.
I hereby banish you from RAO for a fortnight.

Here is a synopsis of your tale of failure and woe:
"Sir Launcelot rode forth to seek adventures with Sir Lionel, but sleepiness
overtook him and he dozed off under a tree. Lionel saw a huge knight defeat
three other knights. Thinking to win glory he challenged the victor, was
beaten in combat, and thrown into a dungeon with other knights. Four queens
passed Launcelot as he slept, one of whom was Morgan le Fay. The queens
kidnaped the sleeping hero, taking him to a castle where they told him he
must choose one of them as a lover or languish in prison. Faithful to
Guinevere, Launcelot chose prison, but he was rescued by a young lady who
asked him to aid her father in a tournament. Launcelot agreed to help and
roundly vanquished her father's opponents. Then he went looking for the huge
knight who had taken Sir Lionel prisoner. He challenged the mighty knight
and after a fierce contest he slew him, and sent a companion to release
Lionel and other knights of Arthur's from their cell."



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Clyde Slick a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>I am assuming that George is George.
>>
>>And you are also assuming that you are a princess ? :-D
>>
>># noun: Christian martyr; patron saint of England; hero of the legend of
>>Saint George and the Dragon in which he slew a dragon and saved a
>>princess.
>
>
> Lionel, you are but merely one of my failed knights.
> I hereby banish you from RAO for a fortnight.
>
> Here is a synopsis of your tale of failure and woe:
> "Sir Launcelot rode forth to seek adventures with Sir Lionel, but sleepiness
> overtook him and he dozed off under a tree. Lionel saw a huge knight defeat
> three other knights. Thinking to win glory he challenged the victor, was
> beaten in combat, and thrown into a dungeon with other knights. Four queens
> passed Launcelot as he slept, one of whom was Morgan le Fay. The queens
> kidnaped the sleeping hero, taking him to a castle where they told him he
> must choose one of them as a lover or languish in prison. Faithful to
> Guinevere, Launcelot chose prison, but he was rescued by a young lady who
> asked him to aid her father in a tournament. Launcelot agreed to help and
> roundly vanquished her father's opponents. Then he went looking for the huge
> knight who had taken Sir Lionel prisoner. He challenged the mighty knight
> and after a fierce contest he slew him, and sent a companion to release
> Lionel and other knights of Arthur's from their cell."

You shouldn't delay any longer the taking of your pills, Sackman.

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick a écrit :
>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>Clyde Slick a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>>I am assuming that George is George.
>>>
>>>And you are also assuming that you are a princess ? :-D
>>>
>>># noun: Christian martyr; patron saint of England; hero of the legend
>>>of Saint George and the Dragon in which he slew a dragon and saved a
>>>princess.
>>
>>
>> Lionel, you are but merely one of my failed knights.
>> I hereby banish you from RAO for a fortnight.
>>
>> Here is a synopsis of your tale of failure and woe:
>> "Sir Launcelot rode forth to seek adventures with Sir Lionel, but
>> sleepiness overtook him and he dozed off under a tree. Lionel saw a huge
>> knight defeat three other knights. Thinking to win glory he challenged
>> the victor, was beaten in combat, and thrown into a dungeon with other
>> knights. Four queens passed Launcelot as he slept, one of whom was Morgan
>> le Fay. The queens kidnaped the sleeping hero, taking him to a castle
>> where they told him he must choose one of them as a lover or languish in
>> prison. Faithful to Guinevere, Launcelot chose prison, but he was rescued
>> by a young lady who asked him to aid her father in a tournament.
>> Launcelot agreed to help and roundly vanquished her father's opponents.
>> Then he went looking for the huge knight who had taken Sir Lionel
>> prisoner. He challenged the mighty knight and after a fierce contest he
>> slew him, and sent a companion to release Lionel and other knights of
>> Arthur's from their cell."
>
> You shouldn't delay any longer the taking of your pills, Sackman.

That's the last time I'll have anyone rescue you form the sew..I mean
dungeon.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Bruce J. Richman]

Clyde Slick wrote:

> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Clyde Slick a =E9crit :
> >> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>
> >>>Clyde Slick a =E9crit :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I am assuming that George is George.
> >>>
> >>>And you are also assuming that you are a princess ? :-D
> >>>
> >>># noun: Christian martyr; patron saint of England; hero of the
legend
> >>>of Saint George and the Dragon in which he slew a dragon and saved
a
> >>>princess.
> >>
> >>
> >> Lionel, you are but merely one of my failed knights.
> >> I hereby banish you from RAO for a fortnight.
> >>
> >> Here is a synopsis of your tale of failure and woe:
> >> "Sir Launcelot rode forth to seek adventures with Sir Lionel, but
> >> sleepiness overtook him and he dozed off under a tree. Lionel saw
a huge
> >> knight defeat three other knights. Thinking to win glory he
challenged
> >> the victor, was beaten in combat, and thrown into a dungeon with
other
> >> knights. Four queens passed Launcelot as he slept, one of whom was
Morgan
> >> le Fay. The queens kidnaped the sleeping hero, taking him to a
castle
> >> where they told him he must choose one of them as a lover or
languish in
> >> prison. Faithful to Guinevere, Launcelot chose prison, but he was
rescued
> >> by a young lady who asked him to aid her father in a tournament.
> >> Launcelot agreed to help and roundly vanquished her father's
opponents.
> >> Then he went looking for the huge knight who had taken Sir Lionel
> >> prisoner. He challenged the mighty knight and after a fierce
contest he
> >> slew him, and sent a companion to release Lionel and other knights
of
> >> Arthur's from their cell."
> >
> > You shouldn't delay any longer the taking of your pills, Sackman.
>
> That's the last time I'll have anyone rescue you form the sew..I mean

> dungeon.
>
>

The one where he works, or the one controlling his posts?



>
> ----=3D=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News=3D=3D----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----=3D East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=3D----

[Lionel]

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>
>
>>"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>>Clyde Slick a écrit :
>>>
>>>>"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Clyde Slick a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I am assuming that George is George.
>>>>>
>>>>>And you are also assuming that you are a princess ? :-D
>>>>>
>>>>># noun: Christian martyr; patron saint of England; hero of the
>
> legend
>
>>>>>of Saint George and the Dragon in which he slew a dragon and saved
>
> a
>
>>>>>princess.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Lionel, you are but merely one of my failed knights.
>>>>I hereby banish you from RAO for a fortnight.
>>>>
>>>>Here is a synopsis of your tale of failure and woe:
>>>>"Sir Launcelot rode forth to seek adventures with Sir Lionel, but
>>>>sleepiness overtook him and he dozed off under a tree. Lionel saw
>
> a huge
>
>>>>knight defeat three other knights. Thinking to win glory he
>
> challenged
>
>>>>the victor, was beaten in combat, and thrown into a dungeon with
>
> other
>
>>>>knights. Four queens passed Launcelot as he slept, one of whom was
>
> Morgan
>
>>>>le Fay. The queens kidnaped the sleeping hero, taking him to a
>
> castle
>
>>>>where they told him he must choose one of them as a lover or
>
> languish in
>
>>>>prison. Faithful to Guinevere, Launcelot chose prison, but he was
>
> rescued
>
>>>>by a young lady who asked him to aid her father in a tournament.
>>>>Launcelot agreed to help and roundly vanquished her father's
>
> opponents.
>
>>>>Then he went looking for the huge knight who had taken Sir Lionel
>>>>prisoner. He challenged the mighty knight and after a fierce
>
> contest he
>
>>>>slew him, and sent a companion to release Lionel and other knights
>
> of
>
>>>>Arthur's from their cell."
>>>
>>>You shouldn't delay any longer the taking of your pills, Sackman.
>>
>>That's the last time I'll have anyone rescue you form the sew..I mean
>
>
>>dungeon.
>>
>>
>
>
> The one where he works, or the one controlling his posts?


Zealots' usual surrealist discussion...
I hope that Sackman has put some ice in his Yalmake. :-)

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>>Clyde Slick a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Clyde Slick a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am assuming that George is George.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And you are also assuming that you are a princess ? :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>># noun: Christian martyr; patron saint of England; hero of the
>>
>> legend
>>
>>>>>>of Saint George and the Dragon in which he slew a dragon and saved
>>
>> a
>>
>>>>>>princess.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Lionel, you are but merely one of my failed knights.
>>>>>I hereby banish you from RAO for a fortnight.
>>>>>
>>>>>Here is a synopsis of your tale of failure and woe:
>>>>>"Sir Launcelot rode forth to seek adventures with Sir Lionel, but
>>>>>sleepiness overtook him and he dozed off under a tree. Lionel saw
>>
>> a huge
>>
>>>>>knight defeat three other knights. Thinking to win glory he
>>
>> challenged
>>
>>>>>the victor, was beaten in combat, and thrown into a dungeon with
>>
>> other
>>
>>>>>knights. Four queens passed Launcelot as he slept, one of whom was
>>
>> Morgan
>>
>>>>>le Fay. The queens kidnaped the sleeping hero, taking him to a
>>
>> castle
>>
>>>>>where they told him he must choose one of them as a lover or
>>
>> languish in
>>
>>>>>prison. Faithful to Guinevere, Launcelot chose prison, but he was
>>
>> rescued
>>
>>>>>by a young lady who asked him to aid her father in a tournament.
>>>>>Launcelot agreed to help and roundly vanquished her father's
>>
>> opponents.
>>
>>>>>Then he went looking for the huge knight who had taken Sir Lionel
>>>>>prisoner. He challenged the mighty knight and after a fierce
>>
>> contest he
>>
>>>>>slew him, and sent a companion to release Lionel and other knights
>>
>> of
>>
>>>>>Arthur's from their cell."
>>>>
>>>>You shouldn't delay any longer the taking of your pills, Sackman.
>>>
>>>That's the last time I'll have anyone rescue you form the sew..I mean
>>
>>
>>>dungeon.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> The one where he works, or the one controlling his posts?
>
>
> Zealots' usual surrealist discussion...
> I hope that Sackman has put some ice in his Yalmake. :-)



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Clyde Slick]

"Sir Lionel the Hapless" :

>
> Zealots' usual surrealist discussion...
> I hope that Sackman has put some ice in his Yalmake. :-)

Is that the best you've got?



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[[email protected]]

Clyde Slick wrote:
>
>
> Is that the best you've got?
>
>
>

Seriously, Art, look at your recent posts and ask yourself the same
question.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Fella" > wrote in message
...
> Lionel wrote:
>
>> In >, Bruce J. Richman wrote
>> :
>>
>>
>>>Lionel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>In >, Sander deWaal wrote :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Lionel > said:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment
>>>>>>2005".
>>>>>>Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry
>>>>>>you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
>>>>>AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
>>>>>psychologists. (=:
>>>>
>>>>I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody
>>>>has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either.
>>
>>
>> Lionel hasn't any competence to be inveited in an audio show.
>
> Neither does the kroog... Hence the invitation! :)
>
What would you do there, besides look at all the "pretty lights?"

[Michael McKelvy]

"Fella" > wrote in message
...
> Lionel wrote:
>
>> In >, Fella wrote :
>>
>>
>>>Lionel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In >, Bruce J. Richman
>>>>wrote
>>>>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Lionel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>In >, Sander deWaal wrote :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Lionel > said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment
>>>>>>>>2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce,
>>>>>>>>but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time
>>>>>>>>perhaps. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting?
>>>>>>>AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most
>>>>>>>psychologists. (=:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that
>>>>>>nobody
>>>>>>has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Lionel hasn't any competence to be inveited in an audio show.
>>>
>>>Neither does the kroog... Hence the invitation! :)
>>
>>
>> This is also what Middius says.
>
>
> I think JA's intention is to put a lid on it once and for all, but, most
> probably it will backfire.
>
>> OTOH I never read something pertinent about
>> audio coming Middius...
>
> No comprendo on this one.
>
Middius is even more clueless about audio than you.

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick a écrit :
> "Sir Lionel the Hapless" :
>
>
>>Zealots' usual surrealist discussion...
>>I hope that Sackman has put some ice in his Yalmake. :-)
>
>
> Is that the best you've got?

LOL !

I wrote you something about Saint George and you answered me with the
story of the knights of the round table...

I've already told you Sackman, I suggest you to find a better source of
historic information than your US TV... :-)

[Michael McKelvy]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> ****-for-Brains does the nasty with Thing.
>
>> No, George's daddy beat him.
>
> Careful of those pubic hairs, Arnii. Thing has been trying to copulate
> with a
> pile of fertilizer.
>
>
And you're not flattered?

[Arny Krueger]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
nk.net

> "Fella" > wrote in message
> ...

>> Lionel wrote:

>> I think JA's intention is to put a lid on it once and for all, but,
>> most probably it will backfire.

I suspect that there will be very little fire of any kind.

>>> OTOH I never read something pertinent about
>>> audio coming Middius...

>> No comprendo on this one.

Come on Fella, you never noticed that Middius almost never posts about
audio?

> Middius is even more clueless about audio than you.

Agreed. Fella is somewhere around the Sackman level in terms of his
perception of audio as magic. Note that he hasn't noticed that Middius
bascially never talks about audio.

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
ups.com
> Clyde Slick wrote:

>> Is that the best you've got?

> Seriously, Art, look at your recent posts and ask yourself the same
> question.

Agreed. Art tries to do snappy short posts, but they just sound stupid. He
has probably posted more exact quotes of the post he's trying to respond to,
with nothing added by him at all, than anybody in the history of RAO. It's
embarrassing to have him posting here, but much the same can be said about
all of the Middius clique, Sander included.

[Sander deWaal]

Paul Dormer > said:

>>Rudy is just a relay, you will note.
>>One with broken contacts, however ;-)

>I emailed some email replies to Rudy via your account, hope that's OK?


You'll have to ask Rudy, I'm not the one in control today ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

[Clyde Slick]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> > wrote in message
> ups.com
>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>
>>> Is that the best you've got?
>
>> Seriously, Art, look at your recent posts and ask yourself the same
>> question.
>
> Agreed. Art tries to do snappy short posts, but they just sound stupid. He
> has probably posted more exact quotes of the post he's trying to respond
> to, with nothing added by him at all, than anybody in the history of RAO.
> It's embarrassing to have him posting here, but much the same can be said
> about all of the Middius clique, Sander included.
>
>



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----