Re: Another Kwestion for the Krooborg

[[email protected]]

Bruce J. "Blowhard" Richman wrote:


> character assassins
>

"Libel!"
"Sockpuppet!"
"7 year history!"
"Flamer!"

[Bruce J. Richman]

The Plumber wrote:


(Bruce J. Richman) wrote:
>
>>With all new respect to your new career choice, we don't need a milkman or
>a
>>plumber or on RAO
>
>Bruce, do you not feel that RAO requires an experienced plumber or
>milk tradesperson just as much as it needs a psychologist? ;-)
>

Of course it does. All 3 jobs are honorable and essential occupations. :)

(My humble apologies. I meant no disrespect).


>>but would welcome a bug exterminator.
>
>As a vegetarian I cannot hurt bugs.. I can only play along with their
>silly games. My house is infested with them, but I say live and let
>live.
>
>>A true story: One of the more creative bug exterminators in Florida - a
>large
>>company - uses Volkwagon beetles as company cars/advertisements - but has a
>>tail attached to each trunk, sticking up, ears just above the side doors,
>and
>>"eyebrows" painted above the headlights.
>
>Not dissimilar to my car, then.
>
>

We won't let the bug exterminators know, but watch out if you ever drive in
Florida.




>
>--------------
>I lay pipe...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

Paul Dormer wrote:


>"Bruce J. Richman" emitted :
>
>>>>With all new respect to your new career choice, we don't need a milkman
>or a
>>>>plumber or on RAO
>>>
>>>Bruce, do you not feel that RAO requires an experienced plumber or
>>>milk tradesperson just as much as it needs a psychologist? ;-)
>>
>>Of course it does. All 3 jobs are honorable and essential occupations. :)
>>
>>(My humble apologies. I meant no disrespect).
>
>No offense taken, but you are quite right. Plenty of patrons round
>these here parts require a good plumbing and/or milking.
>
>I'm thinking about becoming a brain surgeon next.
>
>
>
>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>-----------------------------------
>It's Grim down south..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

That would be an excellent career choice.

There are several Borgs on RAO who would like to have the results of their
lobotomies done again to enhance the results.


Bruce J. Richman

[Ruud Broens]

"The Brain Surgeon" > wrote in message
...
: (Bruce J. Richman) wrote:
:
: >>I'm thinking about becoming a brain surgeon next.
: >
: >That would be an excellent career choice.
: >
: >There are several Borgs on RAO who would like to have the results of their
: >lobotomies done again to enhance the results.
:
: I've only been here for 6 years, about half the training schedule for
: a brain surgeon. I can thus currently deal with two lobes of a
: lobotomized posters brain in one session, but will have to return to
: the other two when I've completed my neuroscience 'zams in 6 years
: time.
:
:
:
: ---------------------------
: I poke inside peoples heads

yeah, but have you yet done a double blind lobotomy
any significant results, there ??;)
Rudy

[JBorg]

> Bruce J. Richman wrote
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>> JBorg wrote in message
>
>
>
>>> And let the newcomers in, to share their enthusiasm about HE
>>> audios, to share their new gadgets, their new wires, and tweaks.
>>
>> Borglet, your constant profane and off-topic haranging does nothing to
>> encourage posting about audio.
>>
>>> Let them come and share their love for vinyl and tubes.
>>
>> You mean like the guy who posted the spam for
>> http://www.worldtubeaudio.com/ ?
>>
>>LOL!
>>
>>> Maybe then, the luminaries will return.
>>
>>Luminaries? You mean daft slackers like Shain?
>
>
> Another typical Krueger smear about a person who objectively described him.

Krooger is just being his obnoxious self, as usual. I couldn't forget what his
pugnacious clique, the repugnant Pinkerton, did and said to J-10 on that
regrettable thread.


> Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

. RAO Sockpuppet and Compulsive Liar wrote:


<listing of words frequently used as accurate descriptors of anonymous
posters and other personal attack posters snipped>

[Bruce J. Richman]

Roy Briggs wrote:


>On 02 Feb 2005 13:21:29 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
>wrote:
>
>>He'll just change identities again. Or maybe he'll go back to being the
>>"Gruvmyster".
>
>Someone else I know thinks that it's Doug. I can't quite believe it if
>that's the case. Do you have any solid evidence? Doug was funny and
>biting, but Tor is really nasty and vindictive. Those weren't
>qualities of Doug's personality.
>
>--
>td
>
>

I had a number of mutually enjoyable offline email exchanges with Doug Haugen
just prior to his leaving RAO. Considering the things he said to me, there is
absolutely no reason to believe that the idiotic liar posting as "Michael
Conzo" is Doug Haugen. Much more likely, is the scenario in which this is just
another Brian McCarty scam being run by one of the many sockpuppets he's
apparently used on RAO over the years.



Bruce J. Richman

[[email protected]]

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
> Roy Briggs wrote:
>
>
> >On 02 Feb 2005 13:21:29 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>He'll just change identities again. Or maybe he'll go back to
being the
> >>"Gruvmyster".
> >
> >Someone else I know thinks that it's Doug. I can't quite believe it
if
> >that's the case. Do you have any solid evidence? Doug was funny and
> >biting, but Tor is really nasty and vindictive. Those weren't
> >qualities of Doug's personality.
> >
> >--
> >td
> >
> >
>
> I had a number of mutually enjoyable offline email exchanges with
Doug Haugen
> just prior to his leaving RAO. Considering the things he said to me,
there is
> absolutely no reason to believe that the idiotic liar posting as
"Michael
> Conzo" is Doug Haugen. Much more likely, is the scenario in which
this is just
> another Brian McCarty scam being run by one of the many sockpuppets
he's
> apparently used on RAO over the years.
>
>
>


You really are senile, eh? Why don't you go back and see where you went
wrong, AutoRepeatQuack?

[Marc Phillips]

The Roy Brigg'ses said:

>On 02 Feb 2005 13:21:29 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
>wrote:
>
>>He'll just change identities again. Or maybe he'll go back to being the
>>"Gruvmyster".
>
>Someone else I know thinks that it's Doug. I can't quite believe it if
>that's the case. Do you have any solid evidence? Doug was funny and
>biting, but Tor is really nasty and vindictive. Those weren't
>qualities of Doug's personality.

It's funny and biting if you look at the big picture.

Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage door, "torresists"
will either never be heard from again, or he will be as vulnerable and as
identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

> The Roy Brigg'ses said:
>
>> On 02 Feb 2005 13:21:29 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
>> wrote:
>>
>>> He'll just change identities again. Or maybe he'll go back to
>>> being the "Gruvmyster".
>>
>> Someone else I know thinks that it's Doug. I can't quite believe it
>> if that's the case. Do you have any solid evidence? Doug was funny
>> and biting, but Tor is really nasty and vindictive. Those weren't
>> qualities of Doug's personality.
>
> It's funny and biting if you look at the big picture.
>
> Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage door,
> "torresists" will either never be heard from again, or he will be as
> vulnerable and as identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.

As if people can't make themselves anonymous without AOL.

I'm sure you'll figure out a way, "Marc".

[[email protected]]

Marc "duh" Phillips wrote:
> The Roy Brigg'ses said:
>
> >On 02 Feb 2005 13:21:29 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>He'll just change identities again. Or maybe he'll go back to
being the
> >>"Gruvmyster".
> >
> >Someone else I know thinks that it's Doug. I can't quite believe it
if
> >that's the case. Do you have any solid evidence? Doug was funny and
> >biting, but Tor is really nasty and vindictive. Those weren't
> >qualities of Doug's personality.
>
> It's funny and biting if you look at the big picture.
>
> Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage door,
"torresists"
> will either never be heard from again, or he will be as vulnerable
and as
> identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.
>
>


It's no fun calling you stupid if you really are stupid. Wise up!

[Arny Krueger]

> wrote in message
oups.com
> Marc "duh" Phillips wrote:
>> The Roy Brigg'ses said:
>>
>>> On 02 Feb 2005 13:21:29 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He'll just change identities again. Or maybe he'll go back to
>>>> being the "Gruvmyster".

If he ever was...

>>> Someone else I know thinks that it's Doug. I can't quite believe it
>>> if that's the case. Do you have any solid evidence? Doug was funny
>>> and biting, but Tor is really nasty and vindictive. Those weren't
>>> qualities of Doug's personality.

It seems to depend on whose ox is gored.

>> It's funny and biting if you look at the big picture.

No fair shooting over Marc's head! ;-)

>> Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage door,
>> "torresists" will either never be heard from again, or he will be as
>> vulnerable and as identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.

As if AOL is the only way to anonymize yourself these days.

> It's no fun calling you stupid if you really are stupid. Wise up!

Remember, Marc has presented himself as being some kind of serious computer
networking professional.

[Marc Phillips]

Arny said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

>> The Roy Brigg'ses said:
>>
>>> On 02 Feb 2005 13:21:29 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He'll just change identities again. Or maybe he'll go back to
>>>> being the "Gruvmyster".
>>>
>>> Someone else I know thinks that it's Doug. I can't quite believe it
>>> if that's the case. Do you have any solid evidence? Doug was funny
>>> and biting, but Tor is really nasty and vindictive. Those weren't
>>> qualities of Doug's personality.
>>
>> It's funny and biting if you look at the big picture.
>>
>> Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage door,
>> "torresists" will either never be heard from again, or he will be as
>> vulnerable and as identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.
>
>As if people can't make themselves anonymous without AOL.
>
>I'm sure you'll figure out a way, "Marc".

I doubt it. It seriously has stopped being worth any extra effort on my part
to post here.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>Marc "duh" Phillips wrote:
>> The Roy Brigg'ses said:
>>
>> >On 02 Feb 2005 13:21:29 GMT, (Marc Phillips)
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>He'll just change identities again. Or maybe he'll go back to
>being the
>> >>"Gruvmyster".
>> >
>> >Someone else I know thinks that it's Doug. I can't quite believe it
>if
>> >that's the case. Do you have any solid evidence? Doug was funny and
>> >biting, but Tor is really nasty and vindictive. Those weren't
>> >qualities of Doug's personality.
>>
>> It's funny and biting if you look at the big picture.
>>
>> Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage door,
>"torresists"
>> will either never be heard from again, or he will be as vulnerable
>and as
>> identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.
>>
>>
>
>
>It's no fun calling you stupid if you really are stupid. Wise up!

You have a serious inability to connect the dots when you're trying to lay out
your arguments. Others have noticed this, too. Perhaps you're really Bill
Watkins!

ROTFLMAO!

Boon

[[email protected]]

Marc "Fat'n' Ugly" Phillips wrote:

> >> Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage door,
> >"torresists"
> >> will either never be heard from again, or he will be as vulnerable
> >and as
> >> identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.
> >>
> >>
I said:
> >
> >
> >It's no fun calling you stupid if you really are stupid. Wise up!
>
>
Fat'n'Ugly persists:


> You have a serious inability to connect the dots when you're trying
to lay out
> your arguments. Others have noticed this, too. Perhaps you're
really Bill
> Watkins!
>
>

There is no argument, ****wad. You simply do not understand that AOL
ending it's Usenet access will not effect *anything*, given the way I
access Usenet.
>
You really are a remarkably dimwitted sack of ****, and arrogant to
boot. Not a good combination.... :-0

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>Marc "Fat'n' Ugly" Phillips wrote:
>
>> >> Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage door,
>> >"torresists"
>> >> will either never be heard from again, or he will be as vulnerable
>> >and as
>> >> identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.
>> >>
>> >>
>I said:
>> >
>> >
>> >It's no fun calling you stupid if you really are stupid. Wise up!
>>
>>
>Fat'n'Ugly persists:
>
>
>> You have a serious inability to connect the dots when you're trying
>to lay out
>> your arguments. Others have noticed this, too. Perhaps you're
>really Bill
>> Watkins!
>>
>>
>
>There is no argument, ****wad. You simply do not understand that AOL
>ending it's Usenet access will not effect *anything*, given the way I
>access Usenet.
>>
>You really are a remarkably dimwitted sack of ****, and arrogant to
>boot. Not a good combination.... :-0

Oh my God...I didn't automatically know how you access the Internet! I'm such
a dimwitted sack of ****!

Actually, only an Internet geek thinks like that. Thanks for reminding me how
sad your existence is.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message


> I doubt it. It seriously has stopped being worth any extra effort on
> my part to post here.

Somehow that makes me feel better. I'd feel bad if you put forth any extra
effort to screw up your postings here any more than they are.

[Arny Krueger]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

> Richard Malesweski said:

>> There is no argument, ****wad. You simply do not understand that AOL
>> ending it's Usenet access will not effect *anything*, given the way I
>> access Usenet.

>> You really are a remarkably dimwitted sack of ****, and arrogant to
>> boot. Not a good combination.... :-0

> Oh my God...I didn't automatically know how you access the Internet!

Marc, I would think that it would take a networking eggsphert like you only
a second to figure out what Tor is talking about.

> I'm such a dimwitted sack of ****!

That, and terminally lazy.

> Actually, only an Internet geek thinks like that.

Marc you must be really out of it, if you don't know that it is now rather
cool to be a geek.

> Thanks for reminding me how sad your existence is.

Marc, things could be far worse - Tor could be like you!

[[email protected]]

Marc "Fat'n'Ugly" Phillips Proves the elevator doesn't go all the way
up:
>
>
> >Marc "Fat'n' Ugly" Phillips wrote:
> >
> >> >> Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage
door,
> >> >"torresists"
> >> >> will either never be heard from again, or he will be as
vulnerable
> >> >and as
> >> >> identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >I said:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >It's no fun calling you stupid if you really are stupid. Wise up!
> >>
> >>
> >Fat'n'Ugly persists:
> >
> >
> >> You have a serious inability to connect the dots when you're
trying
> >to lay out
> >> your arguments. Others have noticed this, too. Perhaps you're
> >really Bill
> >> Watkins!
> >>
> >>
I said:
> >
> >There is no argument, ****wad. You simply do not understand that AOL
> >ending it's Usenet access will not effect *anything*, given the way
I
> >access Usenet.
> >>
> >You really are a remarkably dimwitted sack of ****, and arrogant to
> >boot. Not a good combination.... :-0
>
Fat'n'Ugly has taken his daily stupid pill:
>
> Oh my God...I didn't automatically know how you access the Internet!
I'm such
> a dimwitted sack of ****!

>
Where did I mention "how [I] access the Internet", dimbulb?
>

[[email protected]]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>
> > Richard Malesweski said:
>
> >> There is no argument, ****wad. You simply do not understand that
AOL
> >> ending it's Usenet access will not effect *anything*, given the
way I
> >> access Usenet.
>
> >> You really are a remarkably dimwitted sack of ****, and arrogant
to
> >> boot. Not a good combination.... :-0
>
> > Oh my God...I didn't automatically know how you access the
Internet!
>
> Marc, I would think that it would take a networking eggsphert like
you only
> a second to figure out what Tor is talking about.
>
> > I'm such a dimwitted sack of ****!
>
> That, and terminally lazy.
>
> > Actually, only an Internet geek thinks like that.
>
> Marc you must be really out of it, if you don't know that it is now
rather
> cool to be a geek.
>
> > Thanks for reminding me how sad your existence is.
>
> Marc, things could be far worse - Tor could be like you!
>
>


His absymal ignorance allied to his unbridled arrogance is quite a
sight, eh?

[Marc Phillips]

Arny said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

>
>> I doubt it. It seriously has stopped being worth any extra effort on
>> my part to post here.
>
>Somehow that makes me feel better. I'd feel bad if you put forth any extra
>effort to screw up your postings here any more than they are.

How are my postings here screwed up? I ask this knowing that you will never be
able to provide a reasonable explanation.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Arny said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message

>> Richard Malesweski said:
>
>>> There is no argument, ****wad. You simply do not understand that AOL
>>> ending it's Usenet access will not effect *anything*, given the way I
>>> access Usenet.
>
>>> You really are a remarkably dimwitted sack of ****, and arrogant to
>>> boot. Not a good combination.... :-0
>
>> Oh my God...I didn't automatically know how you access the Internet!
>
>Marc, I would think that it would take a networking eggsphert like you only
>a second to figure out what Tor is talking about.

I know what Tor is talking about. Tor doesn't know what I am talking about.

>
>> I'm such a dimwitted sack of ****!
>
>That, and terminally lazy.

Really. Offer an example of my laziness. I ask this knowing that you will
never be able to offer a reasonable explanation.

>
>> Actually, only an Internet geek thinks like that.
>
>Marc you must be really out of it, if you don't know that it is now rather
>cool to be a geek.

It is not cool to be an Internet geek.

>
>> Thanks for reminding me how sad your existence is.
>
>Marc, things could be far worse - Tor could be like you!

I guess I'm not going to miss you after all.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>Marc "Fat'n'Ugly" Phillips Proves the elevator doesn't go all the way
>up:
>>
>>[i]
>> >Marc "Fat'n' Ugly" Phillips wrote:
>> >
>> >> >> Needless to say, once the AOL asswipes close the big garage
>door,
>> >> >"torresists"
>> >> >> will either never be heard from again, or he will be as
>vulnerable
>> >> >and as
>> >> >> identifiable as anyone that doesn't use AOL.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >I said:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >It's no fun calling you stupid if you really are stupid. Wise up!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >Fat'n'Ugly persists:
>> >
>> >
>> >> You have a serious inability to connect the dots when you're
>trying
>> >to lay out
>> >> your arguments. Others have noticed this, too. Perhaps you're
>> >really Bill
>> >> Watkins!
>> >>
>> >>
>I said:
>> >
>> >There is no argument, ****wad. You simply do not understand that AOL
>> >ending it's Usenet access will not effect *anything*, given the way
>I
>> >access Usenet.
>> >>
>> >You really are a remarkably dimwitted sack of ****, and arrogant to
>> >boot. Not a good combination.... :-0
>>
>Fat'n'Ugly has taken his daily stupid pill:
>>
>> Oh my God...I didn't automatically know how you access the Internet!
>I'm such
>> a dimwitted sack of ****!
>
>>
>Where did I mention "how access the Internet", dimbulb?

I just suddenly realized something. You and Arny are jumping up and down,
thinking you've "got me" on something, and I just can't muster enough interest
to reply.

It comes down to one thing...you don't understand what I'm talking about, or
you understand perfectly well, but you're avoiding the subject.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Richard Malesweski said:

>Arny Krueger wrote:
>> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>>
>> > Richard Malesweski said:
>>
>> >> There is no argument, ****wad. You simply do not understand that
>AOL
>> >> ending it's Usenet access will not effect *anything*, given the
>way I
>> >> access Usenet.
>>
>> >> You really are a remarkably dimwitted sack of ****, and arrogant
>to
>> >> boot. Not a good combination.... :-0
>>
>> > Oh my God...I didn't automatically know how you access the
>Internet!
>>
>> Marc, I would think that it would take a networking eggsphert like
>you only
>> a second to figure out what Tor is talking about.
>>
>> > I'm such a dimwitted sack of ****!
>>
>> That, and terminally lazy.
>>
>> > Actually, only an Internet geek thinks like that.
>>
>> Marc you must be really out of it, if you don't know that it is now
>rather
>> cool to be a geek.
>>
>> > Thanks for reminding me how sad your existence is.
>>
>> Marc, things could be far worse - Tor could be like you!
>>
>>
>
>
>His absymal ignorance allied to his unbridled arrogance is quite a
>sight, eh?

Wow. That's incredibly boring, too. I shouldn't even be responding right now.
Perhaps you could try to **** me off. That way I could possibly give a flying
**** about your existence.

Boon