View Full Version : Oktava MK012 / MC012?
haligonab
November 11th 04, 02:44 AM
I seem to recall someone stating that the MC012 designation was for
mics from the Sound Room. Is this correct? Thanks mucho!
Steve
Scott Dorsey
November 11th 04, 03:30 PM
In article >,
haligonab > wrote:
>I seem to recall someone stating that the MC012 designation was for
>mics from the Sound Room. Is this correct? Thanks mucho!
Sort of. The Cyrillic K is often transliterated as a C. Some of the
importers (including the Sound Room) have them marked with the
transliteration. Some of them (including McKay) do not.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Scott Dorsey
November 11th 04, 03:30 PM
In article >,
haligonab > wrote:
>I seem to recall someone stating that the MC012 designation was for
>mics from the Sound Room. Is this correct? Thanks mucho!
Sort of. The Cyrillic K is often transliterated as a C. Some of the
importers (including the Sound Room) have them marked with the
transliteration. Some of them (including McKay) do not.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
they call me frenchy!!
November 16th 04, 04:41 PM
On 11 Nov 2004 10:30:07 -0500, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
>In article >,
>haligonab > wrote:
>>I seem to recall someone stating that the MC012 designation was for
>>mics from the Sound Room. Is this correct? Thanks mucho!
>
>Sort of. The Cyrillic K is often transliterated as a C. Some of the
>importers (including the Sound Room) have them marked with the
>transliteration. Some of them (including McKay) do not.
>--scott
I've gotten two different pairs from the soundroom a couple of years
apart (for 2 different studios) and the 1st pair was marked Oktava
MC-012, but the 2nd pair was marked Okraba MK-012A-01.
I thought it wierd that the Soundroom sent two completely different
sets of markings out, but I have noticed nothing wrong with either
set.
,
frenchy
they call me frenchy!!
November 16th 04, 04:41 PM
On 11 Nov 2004 10:30:07 -0500, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
>In article >,
>haligonab > wrote:
>>I seem to recall someone stating that the MC012 designation was for
>>mics from the Sound Room. Is this correct? Thanks mucho!
>
>Sort of. The Cyrillic K is often transliterated as a C. Some of the
>importers (including the Sound Room) have them marked with the
>transliteration. Some of them (including McKay) do not.
>--scott
I've gotten two different pairs from the soundroom a couple of years
apart (for 2 different studios) and the 1st pair was marked Oktava
MC-012, but the 2nd pair was marked Okraba MK-012A-01.
I thought it wierd that the Soundroom sent two completely different
sets of markings out, but I have noticed nothing wrong with either
set.
,
frenchy
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.