Re: OT (Political) - "Put Away Your Hankies"

[Don Cooper]

Buster Mudd wrote:

> Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?


Ty who?


> Monday, September 20th, 2004
> Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore
>

> Michael Moore
> www.michaelmoore.com
>


Good article. This guy should do a movie.

[Don Cooper]

Buster Mudd wrote:

> Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?


Ty who?


> Monday, September 20th, 2004
> Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore
>

> Michael Moore
> www.michaelmoore.com
>


Good article. This guy should do a movie.

[Glenn Dowdy]

"Don Cooper" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Buster Mudd wrote:
>
> > Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?
>
>
> Ty who?
>
>
> > Monday, September 20th, 2004
> > Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore
> >
>
> > Michael Moore
> > www.michaelmoore.com
> >
>
>
> Good article. This guy should do a movie.

Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.

Glenn D.

[Glenn Dowdy]

"Don Cooper" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Buster Mudd wrote:
>
> > Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?
>
>
> Ty who?
>
>
> > Monday, September 20th, 2004
> > Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore
> >
>
> > Michael Moore
> > www.michaelmoore.com
> >
>
>
> Good article. This guy should do a movie.

Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.

Glenn D.

[Glenn Dowdy]

"Don Cooper" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Buster Mudd wrote:
>
> > Gosh, d'ya think maybe I'll **** off Ty Ford by posting this here?
>
>
> Ty who?
>
>
> > Monday, September 20th, 2004
> > Put Away Your Hankies...a message from Michael Moore
> >
>
> > Michael Moore
> > www.michaelmoore.com
> >
>
>
> Good article. This guy should do a movie.

Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.

Glenn D.

[Don Cooper]

Glenn Dowdy wrote:

> Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.


Cricket?

It was a joke.

[Don Cooper]

Glenn Dowdy wrote:

> Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.


Cricket?

It was a joke.

[Don Cooper]

Glenn Dowdy wrote:

> Just because he can write, you think he should direct? Jiminy.


Cricket?

It was a joke.

[Pooh Bear]

Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.


Graham

[Pooh Bear]

Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.


Graham

[Pooh Bear]

Buster Mudd wrote:

Nothing himself.


Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
even if I agreed with the view ).

If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.


Graham

[Pete Dimsman]

Pooh Bear wrote:
>
> Buster Mudd wrote:
>
> Nothing himself.
>
>
> Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
> even if I agreed with the view ).
>
> If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.
>


It was of MUCH value.

[Pete Dimsman]

Pooh Bear wrote:
>
> Buster Mudd wrote:
>
> Nothing himself.
>
>
> Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
> even if I agreed with the view ).
>
> If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.
>


It was of MUCH value.

[Pete Dimsman]

Pooh Bear wrote:
>
> Buster Mudd wrote:
>
> Nothing himself.
>
>
> Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
> even if I agreed with the view ).
>
> If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.
>


It was of MUCH value.

[Pooh Bear]

Pete Dimsman wrote:

> Pooh Bear wrote:
>
> > Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
> > even if I agreed with the view ).
>
> WHY?

Because there are enough OT posts here as it is.

If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
copied text is truly lame.


Graham

[Pooh Bear]

Pete Dimsman wrote:

> Pooh Bear wrote:
>
> > Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
> > even if I agreed with the view ).
>
> WHY?

Because there are enough OT posts here as it is.

If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
copied text is truly lame.


Graham

[Pooh Bear]

Pete Dimsman wrote:

> Pooh Bear wrote:
>
> > Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
> > even if I agreed with the view ).
>
> WHY?

Because there are enough OT posts here as it is.

If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
copied text is truly lame.


Graham

[Ty Ford]

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:04:17 -0400, Pooh Bear wrote
(in article >):

>
>
> Buster Mudd wrote:
>
> Nothing himself.
>
>
> Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
> even if I agreed with the view ).
>
> If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.
>
>
> Graham
>

Well put, Graham. Recycling someone elses's crap is simply that.

Buster (or whatever you're REAL name is), your post is basically the same as
one from any equipment troll who's interested in promoting the latest
bull**** mic to unsuspecting members of this newsgroup.

Every post you make is an opportunity to enrich this group. Your efforts
dilute the importance of the group and why we're here. That's pretty pitiful.


Ty Ford





-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

[Ty Ford]

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:04:17 -0400, Pooh Bear wrote
(in article >):

>
>
> Buster Mudd wrote:
>
> Nothing himself.
>
>
> Can you keep the posting of *other* ppl's opinions out of here please (
> even if I agreed with the view ).
>
> If you have nothing of value to contribute yourself then sod off.
>
>
> Graham
>

Well put, Graham. Recycling someone elses's crap is simply that.

Buster (or whatever you're REAL name is), your post is basically the same as
one from any equipment troll who's interested in promoting the latest
bull**** mic to unsuspecting members of this newsgroup.

Every post you make is an opportunity to enrich this group. Your efforts
dilute the importance of the group and why we're here. That's pretty pitiful.


Ty Ford





-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

[Pete Dimsman]

Pooh Bear wrote:

>
> If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
> copied text is truly lame.
>

And there, in a nutshell is President Bush. And you are right, truly lame.

[Pete Dimsman]

Pooh Bear wrote:

>
> If you have something to say yourself - that's one thing - but simply posting
> copied text is truly lame.
>

And there, in a nutshell is President Bush. And you are right, truly lame.

[Buster Mudd]

Ty Ford > wrote in message >...
>
> Recycling someone elses's crap is simply that.
>

You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
a post about what it takes to get elected president?

[Buster Mudd]

Ty Ford > wrote in message >...
>
> Recycling someone elses's crap is simply that.
>

You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
a post about what it takes to get elected president?

[Don Cooper]

Buster Mudd wrote:

> You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
> a post about what it takes to get elected president?


D'oh!

[Don Cooper]

Buster Mudd wrote:

> You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
> a post about what it takes to get elected president?


D'oh!

[Lorin David Schultz]

"Buster Mudd" > wrote:
>
> You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
> a post about what it takes to get elected president?




Well, obviously some people have never read it.

Then there are those who have read it but don't think it applies to
them. They could stand to read it again...

Besides, what better place to bring it up? It would have been the most
on-topic and relevant post in the thread.

Sincerely,
A Guy Who's Getting REALLY ****ing tired of wasting half of his less and
less frequent visits having to wade through mountains of completely
irrelevant bull****, much of which extols the virtues of ****ing up what
once was and still could be a decent PRO AUDIO forum. Yeesh.

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)

[Lorin David Schultz]

"Buster Mudd" > wrote:
>
> You mean like the time you posted the *entire* RAP FAQ in response to
> a post about what it takes to get elected president?




Well, obviously some people have never read it.

Then there are those who have read it but don't think it applies to
them. They could stand to read it again...

Besides, what better place to bring it up? It would have been the most
on-topic and relevant post in the thread.

Sincerely,
A Guy Who's Getting REALLY ****ing tired of wasting half of his less and
less frequent visits having to wade through mountains of completely
irrelevant bull****, much of which extols the virtues of ****ing up what
once was and still could be a decent PRO AUDIO forum. Yeesh.

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)