Re: ot GW's Resume

[Michael R. Kesti]

It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere and
heartfelt manner that I intend, George.

**** off and die, will you please?

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere and
> heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
>
> **** off and die, will you please?

i have no doubts about life always ending in death

if you think I will stop pointing out the failure of this president,
you might as well kllfile me, it ain't gonna happen.

george

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere and
> heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
>
> **** off and die, will you please?

i have no doubts about life always ending in death

if you think I will stop pointing out the failure of this president,
you might as well kllfile me, it ain't gonna happen.

george

[Rich.Andrews]

George > wrote in
:

> In article >,
> "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
>
>> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere
>> and heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
>>
>> **** off and die, will you please?
>
> i have no doubts about life always ending in death
>
> if you think I will stop pointing out the failure of this president,
> you might as well kllfile me, it ain't gonna happen.
>
> george
>

Done!

r


--
Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.

[Rich.Andrews]

George > wrote in
:

> In article >,
> "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
>
>> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere
>> and heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
>>
>> **** off and die, will you please?
>
> i have no doubts about life always ending in death
>
> if you think I will stop pointing out the failure of this president,
> you might as well kllfile me, it ain't gonna happen.
>
> george
>

Done!

r


--
Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.

[Jeremy Stephens]

Is that the only way you can defend your lame president........Typical

"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote in message >...
> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere and
> heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
>
> **** off and die, will you please?

[Jeremy Stephens]

Is that the only way you can defend your lame president........Typical

"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote in message >...
> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere and
> heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
>
> **** off and die, will you please?

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>In article >,
> "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
>
>> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere and
>> heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
>>
>> **** off and die, will you please?
>
>i have no doubts about life always ending in death
>
>if you think I will stop pointing out the failure of this president,

That's all well and good, but could you do so in an appropriate forum?
Perhaps you feel that you would have little to contribute in such a forum
or it may just be that you are the kind who would stand in a crowded theater
and shout, "CAR FOR SALE!"

>you might as well kllfile me, it ain't gonna happen.

Can you guess why I didn't expect that it would?

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>In article >,
> "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
>
>> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere and
>> heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
>>
>> **** off and die, will you please?
>
>i have no doubts about life always ending in death
>
>if you think I will stop pointing out the failure of this president,

That's all well and good, but could you do so in an appropriate forum?
Perhaps you feel that you would have little to contribute in such a forum
or it may just be that you are the kind who would stand in a crowded theater
and shout, "CAR FOR SALE!"

>you might as well kllfile me, it ain't gonna happen.

Can you guess why I didn't expect that it would?

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> > "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
> >
> >> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere and
> >> heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
> >>
> >> **** off and die, will you please?
> >
> >i have no doubts about life always ending in death
> >
> >if you think I will stop pointing out the failure of this president,
>
> That's all well and good, but could you do so in an appropriate forum?
> Perhaps you feel that you would have little to contribute in such a forum
> or it may just be that you are the kind who would stand in a crowded theater
> and shout, "CAR FOR SALE!"
>
> >you might as well kllfile me, it ain't gonna happen.
>
> Can you guess why I didn't expect that it would?

any OT post I start is marked OT
mark that thread for ignore.
G

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> > "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
> >
> >> It is my genuine desire that you accept this only in the most sincere and
> >> heartfelt manner that I intend, George.
> >>
> >> **** off and die, will you please?
> >
> >i have no doubts about life always ending in death
> >
> >if you think I will stop pointing out the failure of this president,
>
> That's all well and good, but could you do so in an appropriate forum?
> Perhaps you feel that you would have little to contribute in such a forum
> or it may just be that you are the kind who would stand in a crowded theater
> and shout, "CAR FOR SALE!"
>
> >you might as well kllfile me, it ain't gonna happen.
>
> Can you guess why I didn't expect that it would?

any OT post I start is marked OT
mark that thread for ignore.
G

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>any OT post I start is marked OT
>mark that thread for ignore.
>G

I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
on topic.

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>any OT post I start is marked OT
>mark that thread for ignore.
>G

I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
on topic.

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >any OT post I start is marked OT
> >mark that thread for ignore.
> >G
>
> I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
> on topic.

i will follow Will , and Romeo
Convince their "WE hate America agenda " to go , I will follow
g

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >any OT post I start is marked OT
> >mark that thread for ignore.
> >G
>
> I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
> on topic.

i will follow Will , and Romeo
Convince their "WE hate America agenda " to go , I will follow
g

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>In article >,
> "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
>
>> George wrote:
>>
>> >any OT post I start is marked OT
>> >mark that thread for ignore.
>> >G
>>
>> I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
>> on topic.
>
>i will follow Will , and Romeo
>Convince their "WE hate America agenda " to go , I will follow
>g

It seems I was incoorect to call your crap sophomoric. I'd change it to
childish but expect that it would still be overestimating you.

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>In article >,
> "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
>
>> George wrote:
>>
>> >any OT post I start is marked OT
>> >mark that thread for ignore.
>> >G
>>
>> I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
>> on topic.
>
>i will follow Will , and Romeo
>Convince their "WE hate America agenda " to go , I will follow
>g

It seems I was incoorect to call your crap sophomoric. I'd change it to
childish but expect that it would still be overestimating you.

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> > "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
> >
> >> George wrote:
> >>
> >> >any OT post I start is marked OT
> >> >mark that thread for ignore.
> >> >G
> >>
> >> I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
> >> on topic.
> >
> >i will follow Will , and Romeo
> >Convince their "WE hate America agenda " to go , I will follow
> >g
>
> It seems I was incoorect to call your crap sophomoric. I'd change it to
> childish but expect that it would still be overestimating you.

and how is yours any better?
pot, kettle,black it seems to me
G

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> > "Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:
> >
> >> George wrote:
> >>
> >> >any OT post I start is marked OT
> >> >mark that thread for ignore.
> >> >G
> >>
> >> I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
> >> on topic.
> >
> >i will follow Will , and Romeo
> >Convince their "WE hate America agenda " to go , I will follow
> >g
>
> It seems I was incoorect to call your crap sophomoric. I'd change it to
> childish but expect that it would still be overestimating you.

and how is yours any better?
pot, kettle,black it seems to me
G

[playon]

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:14:19 -0700, "Michael R. Kesti" >
wrote:

>George wrote:
>
>>any OT post I start is marked OT
>>mark that thread for ignore.
>>G
>
>I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
>on topic.

Why do you read threads clearly marked "OT" if it bothers you so much?

[playon]

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:14:19 -0700, "Michael R. Kesti" >
wrote:

>George wrote:
>
>>any OT post I start is marked OT
>>mark that thread for ignore.
>>G
>
>I have a better idea. Take your sophomoric crap to a forum where it is
>on topic.

Why do you read threads clearly marked "OT" if it bothers you so much?

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>> It seems I was incoorect to call your crap sophomoric. I'd change it to
>> childish but expect that it would still be overestimating you.
>
>and how is yours any better?
>pot, kettle,black it seems to me
>G

It appears that childish would, indeed, have been an overestimation.

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>> It seems I was incoorect to call your crap sophomoric. I'd change it to
>> childish but expect that it would still be overestimating you.
>
>and how is yours any better?
>pot, kettle,black it seems to me
>G

It appears that childish would, indeed, have been an overestimation.

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >> It seems I was incoorect to call your crap sophomoric. I'd change it to
> >> childish but expect that it would still be overestimating you.
> >
> >and how is yours any better?
> >pot, kettle,black it seems to me
> >G
>
> It appears that childish would, indeed, have been an overestimation.

whatever!
do you have something to add to the thread?
G

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >> It seems I was incoorect to call your crap sophomoric. I'd change it to
> >> childish but expect that it would still be overestimating you.
> >
> >and how is yours any better?
> >pot, kettle,black it seems to me
> >G
>
> It appears that childish would, indeed, have been an overestimation.

whatever!
do you have something to add to the thread?
G

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>whatever!
>do you have something to add to the thread?
>G

I don't add to off-topic threads. Do you have anything on-topic to contribute
to the group?

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>whatever!
>do you have something to add to the thread?
>G

I don't add to off-topic threads. Do you have anything on-topic to contribute
to the group?

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[David Morgan \(MAMS\)]

"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote in message...

> I don't add to off-topic threads.

I count six entries.... that gives you greater than 33% of the 15 post thread.
So here's my contribution, to make 16.

[David Morgan \(MAMS\)]

"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote in message...

> I don't add to off-topic threads.

I count six entries.... that gives you greater than 33% of the 15 post thread.
So here's my contribution, to make 16.

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >whatever!
> >do you have something to add to the thread?
> >G
>
> I don't add to off-topic threads. Do you have anything on-topic to contribute
> to the group?

you have posted off topic 4 or 5 times to this thread and yet have not
said anything except you wish me dead
Nice!
george

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >whatever!
> >do you have something to add to the thread?
> >G
>
> I don't add to off-topic threads. Do you have anything on-topic to contribute
> to the group?

you have posted off topic 4 or 5 times to this thread and yet have not
said anything except you wish me dead
Nice!
george

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>you have posted off topic 4 or 5 times to this thread and yet have not
>said anything except you wish me dead
>Nice!
>george

Oh, dear. Now you've gone and got your feelings all hurt and everything,
too. See what happens when you don't play by the rules, George?

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

>you have posted off topic 4 or 5 times to this thread and yet have not
>said anything except you wish me dead
>Nice!
>george

Oh, dear. Now you've gone and got your feelings all hurt and everything,
too. See what happens when you don't play by the rules, George?

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >you have posted off topic 4 or 5 times to this thread and yet have not
> >said anything except you wish me dead
> >Nice!
> >george
>
> Oh, dear. Now you've gone and got your feelings all hurt and everything,
> too. See what happens when you don't play by the rules, George?


How did you infer my "feelings" were hurt?
I don't even know you, you do not have the ability to "hurt" me or my
feelings
you take yourself way to seriously
Still I don't wish you dead
I just wish you could walk the walk , not just talk the talk
If your against ot posting, why do you continue to do so?
G

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> >you have posted off topic 4 or 5 times to this thread and yet have not
> >said anything except you wish me dead
> >Nice!
> >george
>
> Oh, dear. Now you've gone and got your feelings all hurt and everything,
> too. See what happens when you don't play by the rules, George?


How did you infer my "feelings" were hurt?
I don't even know you, you do not have the ability to "hurt" me or my
feelings
you take yourself way to seriously
Still I don't wish you dead
I just wish you could walk the walk , not just talk the talk
If your against ot posting, why do you continue to do so?
G

[Don Cooper]

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

> Wrong, George. Bush didn't buy Harken. He was "elected" to the board on
> the recommendation of his dad, borrowed the money from Harken to buy into
> the Rangers, got elected to Governor, had the Texas people pay for the
> stadium, and made millions on his $650,000 borrowed from the Harken
> retirement trust.
>
> He didn't pay it back and Harken's stock took a dive on the stockmarket, but
> that's not a topic up for debate.


Nice. Remind me to never lend him any money.

: )

[Don Cooper]

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

> Wrong, George. Bush didn't buy Harken. He was "elected" to the board on
> the recommendation of his dad, borrowed the money from Harken to buy into
> the Rangers, got elected to Governor, had the Texas people pay for the
> stadium, and made millions on his $650,000 borrowed from the Harken
> retirement trust.
>
> He didn't pay it back and Harken's stock took a dive on the stockmarket, but
> that's not a topic up for debate.


Nice. Remind me to never lend him any money.

: )

[agent86]

Don Cooper wrote:

>
>
> "Roger W. Norman" wrote:
>
>> Wrong, George. Bush didn't buy Harken. He was "elected" to the board on
>> the recommendation of his dad, borrowed the money from Harken to buy into
>> the Rangers, got elected to Governor, had the Texas people pay for the
>> stadium, and made millions on his $650,000 borrowed from the Harken
>> retirement trust.
>>
>> He didn't pay it back and Harken's stock took a dive on the stockmarket,
>> but that's not a topic up for debate.
>
>
> Nice. Remind me to never lend him any money.

Sorry, too late.

[agent86]

Don Cooper wrote:

>
>
> "Roger W. Norman" wrote:
>
>> Wrong, George. Bush didn't buy Harken. He was "elected" to the board on
>> the recommendation of his dad, borrowed the money from Harken to buy into
>> the Rangers, got elected to Governor, had the Texas people pay for the
>> stadium, and made millions on his $650,000 borrowed from the Harken
>> retirement trust.
>>
>> He didn't pay it back and Harken's stock took a dive on the stockmarket,
>> but that's not a topic up for debate.
>
>
> Nice. Remind me to never lend him any money.

Sorry, too late.

[Don Cooper]

agent86 wrote:

> > Nice. Remind me to never lend him any money.
>
> Sorry, too late.


True.

[Don Cooper]

agent86 wrote:

> > Nice. Remind me to never lend him any money.
>
> Sorry, too late.


True.

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

<snip>

>I just wish you could walk the walk , not just talk the talk
>If your against ot posting, why do you continue to do so?
>G

Oh, puh-leeze.

I again request, with all of my previous sincerity and more, that you ****
off and die.

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[Michael R. Kesti]

George wrote:

<snip>

>I just wish you could walk the walk , not just talk the talk
>If your against ot posting, why do you continue to do so?
>G

Oh, puh-leeze.

I again request, with all of my previous sincerity and more, that you ****
off and die.

--
================================================== ======================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
| - The Who, Bargain

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >I just wish you could walk the walk , not just talk the talk
> >If your against ot posting, why do you continue to do so?
> >G
>
> Oh, puh-leeze.
>
> I again request, with all of my previous sincerity and more, that you ****
> off and die.

and how is this on-topic?
or do you really not have a problem with OT posts and you were just
venting your frustrations over the idiot son of a asshole that is our
president
you can take it out on me, I don't mind
George

[George]

In article >,
"Michael R. Kesti" > wrote:

> George wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >I just wish you could walk the walk , not just talk the talk
> >If your against ot posting, why do you continue to do so?
> >G
>
> Oh, puh-leeze.
>
> I again request, with all of my previous sincerity and more, that you ****
> off and die.

and how is this on-topic?
or do you really not have a problem with OT posts and you were just
venting your frustrations over the idiot son of a asshole that is our
president
you can take it out on me, I don't mind
George

[jjp]

George > wrote in message >...
> I know its been around the block a few times but with the election
> comming up we should review GW accomplishments
> George
>
> George W. Bush's Resume
>
>
> ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS GOVERNOR OF TEXAS:
>
> I eased pollution laws and made Texas the most polluted state in the US.
>
> On my watch Houston replaced Los Angeles as the most smog ridden city in
> America.

Not exactly.

Houston's air pollution problem was with ground-level ozone ONLY.
According to the EPA, there are SIX components or kinds of air
pollution, ozone being just ONE of them.

http://www.dallasnews.com/texas_southwest/STORY.e9eb444f2b.b0.af.0.a4.cccba.
html
"In some ways, calling Houston America's smoggiest city misrepresented
the relative quality of air in the two cities. Los Angeles' air is
worse than Houston's in other categories."

More recent info on ozone violations:

http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=50752
Metropolitan Areas with the Worst Ozone Air Pollution
1 LOS ANGELES-RIVERSIDE-ORANGE COUNTY, CA
2 FRESNO, CA
3 BAKERSFIELD, CA
4 VISALIA- -PORTERVILLE, CA
5 HOUSTON-BAYTOWN-HUNTSVILLE, TX CMSA
6 MERCED, CA
7 SACRAMENTO-ARDEN-ARCADE--TRUCKEE, CA-NV
8 HANFORD-CORCORAN, CA
9 KNOXVILLE-SEVIERVILLE-LA FOLLETTE, TN
10 DALLAS-FORT WORTH, TX CMSA

And overall air quality:

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/2056693
Number of days in 2000-2002 when air quality was unhealthy
1. Riverside-San Bernardino, Ca. 445 days
2. Fresno, Ca. 421
3. Bakersfield, Ca. 409
4. Los Angeles-Long Beach, Ca. 255
5. Sacramento, Ca. 163
6. Pittsburgh, Penn. 134
7. Knoxville, Tenn. 109
8. Birmingham, Al. 100
9. Houston, Tx. 94
10. Baltimore, Md. 93

And particle pollution:

http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science/05/01/smoggy.skies.ap/index.html
".... 1999-2001 EPA data, do not take into account a pollutant that's
considered more dangerous than smog -- tiny particles of soot
that can lodge deep in the lungs and cause heart problems and even
death."

http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=50752
Metropolitan Areas Most Polluted by Year-Round Particle Pollution
1 LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH-RIVERSIDE, CA
2 VISALIA-PORTERVILLE, CA
3 BAKERSFIELD, CA
4 FRESNO-MADERA, CA
5 PITTSBURGH-NEW CASTLE, PA
6 DETROIT-WARREN-FLINT, MI
7 ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-GAINESVILLE, GA
8 CLEVELAND-AKRON-ELYRIA, OH
9 HANFORD-CORCORAN, CA
10 BIRMINGHAM-HOOVER-CULLMAN, AL
(Houston is not on the list of 26 cities)

[jjp]

George > wrote in message >...
> I know its been around the block a few times but with the election
> comming up we should review GW accomplishments
> George
>
> George W. Bush's Resume
>
>
> ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS GOVERNOR OF TEXAS:
>
> I eased pollution laws and made Texas the most polluted state in the US.
>
> On my watch Houston replaced Los Angeles as the most smog ridden city in
> America.

Not exactly.

Houston's air pollution problem was with ground-level ozone ONLY.
According to the EPA, there are SIX components or kinds of air
pollution, ozone being just ONE of them.

http://www.dallasnews.com/texas_southwest/STORY.e9eb444f2b.b0.af.0.a4.cccba.
html
"In some ways, calling Houston America's smoggiest city misrepresented
the relative quality of air in the two cities. Los Angeles' air is
worse than Houston's in other categories."

More recent info on ozone violations:

http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=50752
Metropolitan Areas with the Worst Ozone Air Pollution
1 LOS ANGELES-RIVERSIDE-ORANGE COUNTY, CA
2 FRESNO, CA
3 BAKERSFIELD, CA
4 VISALIA- -PORTERVILLE, CA
5 HOUSTON-BAYTOWN-HUNTSVILLE, TX CMSA
6 MERCED, CA
7 SACRAMENTO-ARDEN-ARCADE--TRUCKEE, CA-NV
8 HANFORD-CORCORAN, CA
9 KNOXVILLE-SEVIERVILLE-LA FOLLETTE, TN
10 DALLAS-FORT WORTH, TX CMSA

And overall air quality:

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/2056693
Number of days in 2000-2002 when air quality was unhealthy
1. Riverside-San Bernardino, Ca. 445 days
2. Fresno, Ca. 421
3. Bakersfield, Ca. 409
4. Los Angeles-Long Beach, Ca. 255
5. Sacramento, Ca. 163
6. Pittsburgh, Penn. 134
7. Knoxville, Tenn. 109
8. Birmingham, Al. 100
9. Houston, Tx. 94
10. Baltimore, Md. 93

And particle pollution:

http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science/05/01/smoggy.skies.ap/index.html
".... 1999-2001 EPA data, do not take into account a pollutant that's
considered more dangerous than smog -- tiny particles of soot
that can lodge deep in the lungs and cause heart problems and even
death."

http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=50752
Metropolitan Areas Most Polluted by Year-Round Particle Pollution
1 LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH-RIVERSIDE, CA
2 VISALIA-PORTERVILLE, CA
3 BAKERSFIELD, CA
4 FRESNO-MADERA, CA
5 PITTSBURGH-NEW CASTLE, PA
6 DETROIT-WARREN-FLINT, MI
7 ATLANTA-SANDY SPRINGS-GAINESVILLE, GA
8 CLEVELAND-AKRON-ELYRIA, OH
9 HANFORD-CORCORAN, CA
10 BIRMINGHAM-HOOVER-CULLMAN, AL
(Houston is not on the list of 26 cities)