PDA

View Full Version : Re: Bad Room, Good Monitors?


Greg
August 6th 04, 06:55 AM
Thanks Scott, JoVee and Dave,
Just to follow up a bit,

>What's wrong with my current speakers?

They don't give me an accurate sound image. I need to check the mix on
multiple systems to get a not-so-terrible sound.

>> Are you stuck with this room forever?
I could move somewhere else in my place however it would just be
tighter. I suspect the hall or bathroom would not help to much. I'm
stuck here for at least 3 years, until then I don't expect a miracle,
I just want to make improvements where I can.

Kalle L.
August 6th 04, 11:01 AM
(Greg) wrote in message >...
> Hi all,
> I'm looking for a little advice. I am recording/mixing in a terrible
> room. specs~12x12x8, nearly square. I also am using stereo speakers to
> mix. I know it's awful.
>
> My question, is it worth it to invest in monitors when my room
> conditions are so poor?

Hi there Greg,

I just wrote about my situation in another thread too, but here goes
again.

I record & mix in a small room, 3m x 4m x 2m. I use Tannoy Active
monitors (about USD 500/pair). The walls are made of concrete &
bricks. I had some serious problems with the sound (boominess,
boxiness). But a couple of days ago, I did some extensive research
(from Ethan Winer's articles, among others) and decided to re-arrange
the whole room.

1. I changed the mixing desk to a symmetrical position in the room.
Behind and sides and top (ceiling) of the mixing desk & monitors are
completely symmetrical now in terms of furniture etc. It is pretty
much in the middle of the room, whereas it used to be in a corner. Now
the monitors are more farther away from the wall too. That got rid of
the boominess.
2. I bought panels of a certain rock-wool -type of material, and put
that:
- on the wall behind the speakers (thicker panels there, to absorb
more bassy frequenzies)
- Elsewhere where there are big open wall surfaces to absorb higher
frequenzies. Not everywhere though - there has to be some wallspace
left to where I can put the picture of my meeting with Bruce
Springsteen :)
3. I put small (but high) bookselves on every corner of the room, in
slightly different angles.

The sound of monitors is so much better now! Even in higher volume
levels. I can feel the bass but it not that muddy anymore. Also the
room reverbs of higher frequenzies have reduced significantly. Also,
now with the more correct placement of speakers I could really benefit
from the actual sound that they provide.

So I'd suggest that you get some good monitors. But also invest some
time to really investigating acoustic treating and absorbers. It pays
off in the end. And that knowledge will stay with you always, and you
will always be using it throughout your life.

Sometimes it's not the money that you put in, you can also improve the
sound of the room with some existing furniture and other material you
already have. Although some fiberclass will most propably be needed
too :)

Here's a good forum where there are some of mr. Winer's writings too:
http://homerecording.com/bbs/

Good luck!

Kalle

Laurence Payne
August 6th 04, 10:36 PM
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 19:48:39 GMT, "David Grant"
> wrote:

>I agree it's unwise to put the monitor forward of the speakers, but i've
>seen so many setups (mine included) with the monitor directly in line. Is it
>really THAT detrimental to the sound? I can inch mine back a bit, but it's
>already annoyingly far away (and it's 19" - not tiny)

Take the monitor away and see.

CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm
"Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect