Re: duh! Or, Is ParanoaT Catching?

[R]

(Bruce J. Richman) wrote in
:

> Paul Dormer wrote:
>
>>"Michael McKelvy" emitted :
>>
>>>Richman could spare 10 minutes out of his day and shut me up.
>>
>>Or he could sit back and enjoy the show.
>>
>>
>>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>>-----------------------------------
>>It's Grim up north..
>>
>>

> I believe the late
> Walt Disney had a very descriptive title for McKelvy's rantings and
> ravings - LOONEY TUNES.
>
>
> Bruce J. Richman
>
>
>
>

It was Warner Bros. that made "Looney Tunes", not Disney.


r
--
Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
>R wrote:
>
(Bruce J. Richman) wrote in
:
>>
>>> Paul Dormer wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Michael McKelvy" emitted :
>>>>
>>>>>Richman could spare 10 minutes out of his day and shut me up.
>>>>
>>>>Or he could sit back and enjoy the show.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>>>>-----------------------------------
>>>>It's Grim up north..
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>> I believe the late
>>> Walt Disney had a very descriptive title for McKelvy's rantings and
>>> ravings - LOONEY TUNES.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bruce J. Richman
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>It was Warner Bros. that made "Looney Tunes", not Disney.
>>
>>
>>r
>>--
>>Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.
>>
>>
>
> I stand corrected. After I quickly dashed off the post, I sort of thought
> that
> might have been the case, as I recalled some of those ending credit logos.
>
> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
> smear
> campaign.
>
>
>
>
>
There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it directed
at me.

[Bruce J. Richman]

>Subject: Re: duh! Or, Is ParanoaT Catching?
>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/22/2004 6:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: t>
>
>
>"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
>>R wrote:
>>
(Bruce J. Richman) wrote in
:
>>>
>>>> Paul Dormer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Michael McKelvy" emitted :
>>>>>
>>>>>>Richman could spare 10 minutes out of his day and shut me up.
>>>>>
>>>>>Or he could sit back and enjoy the show.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>>>>>-----------------------------------
>>>>>It's Grim up north..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>> I believe the late
>>>> Walt Disney had a very descriptive title for McKelvy's rantings and
>>>> ravings - LOONEY TUNES.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruce J. Richman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>It was Warner Bros. that made "Looney Tunes", not Disney.
>>>
>>>
>>>r
>>>--
>>>Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I stand corrected. After I quickly dashed off the post, I sort of thought
>> that
>> might have been the case, as I recalled some of those ending credit logos.
>>
>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>> smear
>> campaign.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it directed
>at me.
>
>
>

I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings - essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day - he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post
as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist


Bruce J. Richman

[dave weil]

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> wrote:

>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>> smear
>> campaign.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it directed
>at me.

Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
attempt to justify lying. Just admit that you lied and this will all
go away. No calls necessary. No verification of your phone number
necessary. Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?

[Clyde Slick]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> Dave Weil wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> wrote:
>>
>>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>>> smear
>>>> campaign.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it
>>>directed
>>>at me.
>>
>>Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
>>attempt to justify lying. Just admit that you lied and this will all
>>go away. No calls necessary. No verification of your phone number
>>necessary. Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
>>Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
>>Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Mikey's 7 year history of delusional lies and outrageous libelous
> statements
> about me fully justifies all the ridicule and scorn he's earned. He needs
> to
> go a lot further than just admit that he's lying *now*. He's been "lying"
> about very specific proven facts for over 7 years, and continues to do so.
> His
> laughable attempts to rationalize and justify them by calling them
> "opinions"
> should and does insult the intelligence of all of us. He's a proven liar,
> hypocrite, and character assassin.
>
>

I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
will see that happen.

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick wrote:

> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
> ride off into the sunset.

The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
hypocrit.

[Bruce J. Richman]

Clyde Slick wrote:


>"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
>> Dave Weil wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>>>> smear
>>>>> campaign.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it
>>>>directed
>>>>at me.
>>>
>>>Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
>>>attempt to justify lying. Just admit that you lied and this will all
>>>go away. No calls necessary. No verification of your phone number
>>>necessary. Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
>>>Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
>>>Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Mikey's 7 year history of delusional lies and outrageous libelous
>> statements
>> about me fully justifies all the ridicule and scorn he's earned. He needs
>> to
>> go a lot further than just admit that he's lying *now*. He's been "lying"
>> about very specific proven facts for over 7 years, and continues to do so.
>> His
>> laughable attempts to rationalize and justify them by calling them
>> "opinions"
>> should and does insult the intelligence of all of us. He's a proven liar,
>> hypocrite, and character assassin.
>>
>>
>
>I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>will see that happen.
>
>

I hope you're right. "At least" then he could claim that he's acted
appropriately once in his miserable, despicable RAO tenure.


Bruce J. Richman

[Michael McKelvy]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> > wrote:
>
>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>> smear
>>> campaign.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it directed
>>at me.
>
> Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
> attempt to justify lying.

Haven't lied.

Just admit that you lied and this will all
> go away.

I won't admit to what hasn't happened.
My self esteem doesn't hinge on you believing me.

No calls necessary.
No verification of your phone number
> necessary.

Already done, I've stated where I live and I'm in the phonebook. I usually
accept phone calls, I don't have caller ID except on my cell phone. I don't
know how it works on phone systems in other states but here if you have
caller ID you get the mumber only if it's from someone not in your database.

Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
> Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
> Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>
>
If I had done what you claim, but I didn't.

If Bruce ever condescends to accept my proposal to post the last 4 digits of
the phone I call him from, I'll accept that he is who he says and never say
another word to him or about him, ever.

I fabricated nothing.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Dave Weil wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>>>> smear
>>>>> campaign.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it
>>>>directed
>>>>at me.
>>>
>>>Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
>>>attempt to justify lying. Just admit that you lied and this will all
>>>go away. No calls necessary. No verification of your phone number
>>>necessary. Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
>>>Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
>>>Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Mikey's 7 year history of delusional lies and outrageous libelous
>> statements
>> about me fully justifies all the ridicule and scorn he's earned. He
>> needs to
>> go a lot further than just admit that he's lying *now*. He's been
>> "lying"
>> about very specific proven facts for over 7 years, and continues to do
>> so. His
>> laughable attempts to rationalize and justify them by calling them
>> "opinions"
>> should and does insult the intelligence of all of us. He's a proven
>> liar,
>> hypocrite, and character assassin.
>>
>>
>
> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
> will see that happen.
Don't bet on it.

[Michael McKelvy]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Clyde Slick said:
>
>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>> will see that happen.
>
> That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a
> sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does
> feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed.

Nor is there any reason I should. Even less of a reason when compared to
the behavior of you and the other RAO thugs.

A sane person
> probably would feel one or all of those.

How would you know?

The evidence has revealed
> deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup,

No, it's revealed that people can make up things if they wish to make
someone guilty of imagined crimes.

both serving a master plan of
> character assassination.

That would be you and the other RAO thughs.

But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his
> behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of
> argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all
> he needs is to be noticed.
>

You again.

> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants
> of life.
>
>
Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>
>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>> ride off into the sunset.
>
> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
> hypocrit.

So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
lie about Dr R.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>
>
>>"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
>>> Dave Weil wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>>>>> smear
>>>>>> campaign.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it
>>>>>directed
>>>>>at me.
>>>>
>>>>Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
>>>>attempt to justify lying. Just admit that you lied and this will all
>>>>go away. No calls necessary. No verification of your phone number
>>>>necessary. Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
>>>>Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
>>>>Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mikey's 7 year history of delusional lies and outrageous libelous
>>> statements
>>> about me fully justifies all the ridicule and scorn he's earned. He
>>> needs
>>> to
>>> go a lot further than just admit that he's lying *now*. He's been
>>> "lying"
>>> about very specific proven facts for over 7 years, and continues to do
>>> so.
>>> His
>>> laughable attempts to rationalize and justify them by calling them
>>> "opinions"
>>> should and does insult the intelligence of all of us. He's a proven
>>> liar,
>>> hypocrite, and character assassin.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>will see that happen.
>>
>>
>
> I hope you're right. "At least" then he could claim that he's acted
> appropriately once in his miserable, despicable RAO tenure.
>
>
> Bruce J. Richman
>
>
>

[Michael McKelvy]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>
>
>>"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
>>> Dave Weil wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>>>>> smear
>>>>>> campaign.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it
>>>>>directed
>>>>>at me.
>>>>
>>>>Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
>>>>attempt to justify lying. Just admit that you lied and this will all
>>>>go away. No calls necessary. No verification of your phone number
>>>>necessary. Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
>>>>Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
>>>>Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mikey's 7 year history of delusional lies and outrageous libelous
>>> statements
>>> about me fully justifies all the ridicule and scorn he's earned. He
>>> needs
>>> to
>>> go a lot further than just admit that he's lying *now*. He's been
>>> "lying"
>>> about very specific proven facts for over 7 years, and continues to do
>>> so.
>>> His
>>> laughable attempts to rationalize and justify them by calling them
>>> "opinions"
>>> should and does insult the intelligence of all of us. He's a proven
>>> liar,
>>> hypocrite, and character assassin.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>will see that happen.
>>
>>
>
> I hope you're right. "At least" then he could claim that he's acted
> appropriately once in his miserable, despicable RAO tenure.
>
>
>
That's more than you can say quackenbush. I at least have the good taste
not to make a personal; attack in a thread memorializing someone like Julian
Hirsch, or God forbid someone's family member. A shame you can't say the
same.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>
>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>
>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
>> hypocrit.
>
> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
> lie about Dr R.
>
You "know" no such thing. You believe it.

[Bruce J. Richman]

Paul Dormer wrote:


>"Michael McKelvy" emitted :
>
>>If Bruce ever condescends to accept my proposal to post the last 4 digits of
>
>>the phone I call him from, I'll accept that he is who he says and never say
>>another word to him or about him, ever.
>

Anybody who believes this hasn't been paying attention for over 7 years.
ROFLMAO !!!!


>Let's say Bruce condescends to your level, (*as you put it,)

It would be both morally and intellectually impossible for me to seek that low.

by taking
>you up on this unilateral "proposal". Let's say he provides The four
>digits, but you deny that they are the correct ones.


jOf course, he wouldn't be lying. He would just be expressing an "opinion".

ROFLMAO !!!!!


>Let's face it. You are the liar, after all...
>
>Merry Bloody Christmas... ;-)
>
>
>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>-----------------------------------
>It's Grim up north..
>
>

He's been lying for over 7 years and continues to do so.



Bruce J. Richman

[S888Wheel]

>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/23/2004 1:29 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: et>
>
>
>"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>>> smear
>>>> campaign.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it directed
>>>at me.
>>
>> Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
>> attempt to justify lying.
>
>Haven't lied.

You just did it again.


>
> Just admit that you lied and this will all
>> go away.
>
>I won't admit to what hasn't happened.

You won't admit to what has happened. There are many witnesses.


>My self esteem doesn't hinge on you believing me.

It seems to hinge on a bizarre delusion of purity on your part.


>
> No calls necessary.
> No verification of your phone number
>> necessary.
>
>Already done, I've stated where I live and I'm in the phonebook. I usually
>accept phone calls, I don't have caller ID except on my cell phone. I don't
>know how it works on phone systems in other states but here if you have
>caller ID you get the mumber only if it's from someone not in your database.

We still don't know for sure.


>
> Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
>> Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
>> Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>>
>>
>If I had done what you claim, but I didn't.

That's just sad.


>
>If Bruce ever condescends to accept my proposal to post the last 4 digits of
>the phone I call him from, I'll accept that he is who he says and never say
>another word to him or about him, ever.


If you ever get your own episode of COPs and tellus in advanced of it's air
date, I will believe you are who you claim to be.


>
>I fabricated nothing.


Balony, whoever you are.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Paul Dormer" > wrote in message
...
> "Michael McKelvy" emitted :
>
>>If Bruce ever condescends to accept my proposal to post the last 4 digits
>>of
>>the phone I call him from, I'll accept that he is who he says and never
>>say
>>another word to him or about him, ever.
>
> Let's say Bruce condescends to your level, (*as you put it,) by taking
> you up on this unilateral "proposal". Let's say he provides The four
> digits, but you deny that they are the correct ones.
>
> Let's face it. You are the liar, after all...
>
> Merry Bloody Christmas... ;-)
>
>
> S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
> -----------------------------------
> It's Grim up north..

[Michael McKelvy]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> Paul Dormer wrote:
>
>
>>"Michael McKelvy" emitted :
>>
>>>If Bruce ever condescends to accept my proposal to post the last 4 digits
>>>of
>>
>>>the phone I call him from, I'll accept that he is who he says and never
>>>say
>>>another word to him or about him, ever.
>>
>
> Anybody who believes this hasn't been paying attention for over 7 years.
> ROFLMAO !!!!
>
>
>>Let's say Bruce condescends to your level, (*as you put it,)
>
> It would be both morally and intellectually impossible for me to seek that
> low.
>
> by taking
>>you up on this unilateral "proposal". Let's say he provides The four
>>digits, but you deny that they are the correct ones.
>
>
> jOf course, he wouldn't be lying. He would just be expressing an
> "opinion".
>
> ROFLMAO !!!!!
>
>
>>Let's face it. You are the liar, after all...
>>
>>Merry Bloody Christmas... ;-)
>>
>>
>>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>>-----------------------------------
>>It's Grim up north..
>>
>>
>
> He's been lying for over 7 years and continues to do so.
>
>
Talking to the mirror again?

[Michael McKelvy]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/23/2004 1:29 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: et>
>>
>>
>>"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>>>> smear
>>>>> campaign.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it
>>>>directed
>>>>at me.
>>>
>>> Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
>>> attempt to justify lying.
>>
>>Haven't lied.
>
> You just did it again.
>
>
>>
>> Just admit that you lied and this will all
>>> go away.
>>
>>I won't admit to what hasn't happened.
>
> You won't admit to what has happened. There are many witnesses.
>
>
>>My self esteem doesn't hinge on you believing me.
>
> It seems to hinge on a bizarre delusion of purity on your part.
>
>
>>
>> No calls necessary.
>> No verification of your phone number
>>> necessary.
>>
>>Already done, I've stated where I live and I'm in the phonebook. I
>>usually
>>accept phone calls, I don't have caller ID except on my cell phone. I
>>don't
>>know how it works on phone systems in other states but here if you have
>>caller ID you get the mumber only if it's from someone not in your
>>database.
>
> We still don't know for sure.
>
>
>>
>> Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
>>> Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
>>> Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>>>
>>>
>>If I had done what you claim, but I didn't.
>
> That's just sad.
>
>No, it's just true.
>>
>>If Bruce ever condescends to accept my proposal to post the last 4 digits
>>of
>>the phone I call him from, I'll accept that he is who he says and never
>>say
>>another word to him or about him, ever.
>
>
> If you ever get your own episode of COPs and tellus in advanced of it's
> air
> date, I will believe you are who you claim to be.
>
>
>>
>>I fabricated nothing.
>
>
> Balony, whoever you are.
>
The guy in the phone book.

[Bruce J. Richman]

>Subject: Re: duh! Or, Is ParanoaT Catching?
>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/23/2004 9:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: t>
>
>
>"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
>> Paul Dormer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Michael McKelvy" emitted :
>>>
>>>>If Bruce ever condescends to accept my proposal to post the last 4 digits
>>>>of
>>>
>>>>the phone I call him from, I'll accept that he is who he says and never
>>>>say
>>>>another word to him or about him, ever.
>>>
>>
>> Anybody who believes this hasn't been paying attention for over 7 years.
>> ROFLMAO !!!!
>>
>>
>>>Let's say Bruce condescends to your level, (*as you put it,)
>>
>> It would be both morally and intellectually impossible for me to seek that
>> low.
>>
>> by taking
>>>you up on this unilateral "proposal". Let's say he provides The four
>>>digits, but you deny that they are the correct ones.
>>
>>
>> jOf course, he wouldn't be lying. He would just be expressing an
>> "opinion".
>>
>> ROFLMAO !!!!!
>>
>>
>>>Let's face it. You are the liar, after all...
>>>
>>>Merry Bloody Christmas... ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>>>-----------------------------------
>>>It's Grim up north..
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He's been lying for over 7 years and continues to do so.
>>
>>
>Talking to the mirror again?
>
>
>
>

>Bye, Bye Truth - by Pinocchio McKelvy
>
>(to the tune of Bye, Bye, Love)
>
>Bye, bye truth
>Bye bye honesty, hello lunacy
>I think I'm a gonna lie
>Bye bye truth, bye bye sanity, hello idiocy
>I think that I should lie
>Bye, bye the truth, goodbye
>
>Here's lots of bull**** you all can read
>It's really stupid, quite dumb indeed
>Most won't believe it, but if you do
>I've more delusions that I can spew
>
>Bye, bye truth
>Bye bye honesty, hello lunacy
>I think I'm a gonna lie
>Bye bye truth, bye bye sanity, hello idiocy
>I think that I should lie
>Bye, bye the truth, goodbye
>
>I'm-a through with doctors, I'm through with pills
>I'm through with treatment for mental ills
>And here's the reason that I'm so free
>Some strange new voices now talk to me !
>
>Bye, bye truth
>Bye bye honesty, hello lunacy
>I think I'm a gonna lie
>Bye bye truth, bye bye sanity, hello idiocy
>I think that I should lie
>Bye, bye the truth, goodbye



Bruce J. Richman

[Michael McKelvy]

"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
> > wrote:
>
>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>> smear
>>> campaign.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it directed
>>at me.
>
> Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
> attempt to justify lying. Just admit that you lied and this will all
> go away. No calls necessary. No verification of your phone number
> necessary. Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
> Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
> Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>
>
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Owner/My%20Documents/YellowPages_com%20Seek%20And%20You%20Will%20Find%2 0(SM).htm

file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Owner/My%20Documents/WhitePages_com%20-%20Online%20Directory%20Assistance.htm

Let's see if this helps.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "dave weil" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>>> smear
>>>> campaign.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it
>>>directed
>>>at me.
>>
>> Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
>> attempt to justify lying. Just admit that you lied and this will all
>> go away. No calls necessary. No verification of your phone number
>> necessary. Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
>> Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
>> Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>>
>>
> file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Owner/My%20Documents/YellowPages_com%20Seek%20And%20You%20Will%20Find%2 0(SM).htm
>
> file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Owner/My%20Documents/WhitePages_com%20-%20Online%20Directory%20Assistance.htm
>
> Let's see if this helps.
>
I forgot to mention. Go **** yourself.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>
>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
>>> hypocrit.
>>
>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>> lie about Dr R.
>>
>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.

I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr. Richman's
phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take pictures of
everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me $1000, plus
all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I will pay
YOU $1000.

Will that shut you up for good?

Boon

[Bruce J. Richman]

Scott Wheeler wrote:

>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/23/2004 1:29 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: et>
>>
>>
>>"dave weil" > wrote in message
...
>>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:42:00 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In any event, the title is certainly fitting for McKelvy's delusional
>>>>> smear
>>>>> campaign.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>There's a smear campaign alright, but it's not coming from me, it directed
>>>>at me.
>>>
>>> Sorry Mike, but you're bringing it on yourself with your pathetic
>>> attempt to justify lying.
>>
>>Haven't lied.
>
>You just did it again.
>

Of course, he'll claim it was just an "opinion". I wonder who his next
fictitious email will come from.

McKelvy's obviously been doing his Christmas shopping at "Lies 'R Us".
>>
>> Just admit that you lied and this will all
>>> go away.
>>
>>I won't admit to what hasn't happened.
>
>You won't admit to what has happened. There are many witnesses.
>

i think he should take a polygraph test. Of course, it might be difficult to
find a heavy duty polygraph that can stand the unbelievable stress that
McKelvy's reactions would present.

>
>>My self esteem doesn't hinge on you believing me.
>
>It seems to hinge on a bizarre delusion of purity on your part.
>
>
>>
>> No calls necessary.
>> No verification of your phone number
>>> necessary.
>>
>>Already done, I've stated where I live and I'm in the phonebook. I usually
>>accept phone calls, I don't have caller ID except on my cell phone. I don't
>
>>know how it works on phone systems in other states but here if you have
>>caller ID you get the mumber only if it's from someone not in your database.
>
>We still don't know for sure.
>

The poster calling himself McKelvy couild be somebody's sock ppuppet for all we
know.


>
>>
>> Just say, "I'm sorry that I fabricated this whole 'getting
>>> Bruce's phone number' thing and I'll never say another thing about it.
>>> Sound as reasonable as *your* demands toward Bruce?
>>>
>>>
>>If I had done what you claim, but I didn't.
>
>That's just sad.
>
>
>>
>>If Bruce ever condescends to accept my proposal to post the last 4 digits of
>
>>the phone I call him from, I'll accept that he is who he says and never say
>>another word to him or about him, ever.
>

ROFLMAO!!!! Does he really expect any of us to believe this bull****?

>
>If you ever get your own episode of COPs and tellus in advanced of it's air
>date, I will believe you are who you claim to be.
>





>
>>
>>I fabricated nothing.
>
>
>Balony, whoever you are.
>
>

I got an email from a person who is in a position to know who told me that
McKelvy is really one of the following individuals:

http://www.planetscott.com/babes/viewerstories.asp




Bruce J. Richman

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>
>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
>>>> hypocrit.
>>>
>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>
>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>
> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr.
> Richman's
> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take pictures
> of
> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me $1000,
> plus
> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I will
> pay
> YOU $1000.
>
> Will that shut you up for good?
>
Why in the **** would I trust you?

My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone number
I call him from, I will shut up about him.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>
>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>
>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>
>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>
>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr.
>> Richman's
>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take pictures
>> of
>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me $1000,
>> plus
>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I will
>> pay
>> YOU $1000.
>>
>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>
>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>
>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone number
>I call him from, I will shut up about him.

So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence? You mean just
like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied about having
read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
pornography on his hard drive?

I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG. You are way too stupid
to be here, wasting everyone's time. Your status as an utter moron was
established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of stupidity. You
need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more meaningful life
away from RAO.

It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the Internet.
Go away. Don't come back.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>

>>
>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>> will see that happen.
> Don't bet on it.
>

"At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
as a plagiarizer.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>
>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
>> underpants
>> of life.
>>
>>
> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>

But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>
>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
>>> hypocrit.
>>
>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>> lie about Dr R.
>>
> You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>

At one point you said you could not find his number.
Immediately thereafter, you said you had his number for quite a while.

[Clyde Slick]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
>>

>>>
>
> I got an email from a person who is in a position to know who told me that
> McKelvy is really one of the following individuals:
>
> http://www.planetscott.com/babes/viewerstories.asp
>
>
>

I think Mikey might be this fellow


"I was last week in Bangkok and wanted to try some insects
which are sold there, but the salesmen at the booths did annoy
me by touching me and trying to get my attention, so I didn't
want to buy anything at the booths anymore.

The last evening there, I was with two collegues at a restaurant/bar
and ,as always, I did not drink any alcohol. This seems to be a problem
for some people. So after a while they let me choose to drink some
beer or to eat insects. The answer was easy: insects. So one
collegue went buying me some insects, i.e. I got insects worth
B 20 delivered to my table for free! I got a scorpion, a grasshopper,
a big beetle and some worms. I didn't like the scorpion (maybe it
was fried to long), but the others were good (Although the
chitin was a bit hard-bitten). And the one who was digusted
was not me, as they probably hoped, but them.

I discarded only the legs and other extremities, because
they were rather hard, and ate the rest of the insects. Was that correct?

Mahlzeit

ed --- Your insect eating ettiquitte is exquisite

endergone Zwiebeltuete"

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
.net...
> Why in the **** would I trust you?
>
> My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
> number I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>
Why in the **** would anyone trust 'you'?.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>
>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>
>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>
>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr.
>>> Richman's
>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>> pictures
>>> of
>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me $1000,
>>> plus
>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I
>>> will
>>> pay
>>> YOU $1000.
>>>
>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>
>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>
>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>number
>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>
> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?

Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your flimsy
grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.

You mean just
> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied about
> having
> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
> pornography on his hard drive?
>

Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.

> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.

OOoooh, I'm trembling.

You are way too stupid
> to be here, wasting everyone's time.

And you are a waste of good air.

Your status as an utter moron was
> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of stupidity.

Have some more cake.

You
> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more meaningful
> life
> away from RAO.
>
You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on Lipo
suction or join a gym.

> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
> Internet.

It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put out of
your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a NG.

> Go away. Don't come back.
>
Let me think about it for a minute.

Hmmmmm. NO.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> .net...
>> Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>
>> My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>> number I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>
> Why in the **** would anyone trust 'you'?.
>
What's too trust? Either he gets the numbers right or not.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>
>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
>>>> hypocrit.
>>>
>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>
>> You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>
>
> At one point you said you could not find his number.

I said I couldn't find it when I searched for it. I searched for it because
the number I had got me no results.

> Immediately thereafter, you said you had his number for quite a while.
I said for a few months IIRC. Since I got no answer from that one, I
searched for something that might get me one.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>
>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
>>> underpants
>>> of life.
>>>
>>>
>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>
>
> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny.
>
You're standing to close to Boon.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>
>>>
>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>> will see that happen.
>> Don't bet on it.
>>
>
> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
> as a plagiarizer.
>
When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>
>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>
>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr.
>>>> Richman's
>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>> pictures
>>>> of
>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me $1000,
>>>> plus
>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I
>>>> will
>>>> pay
>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>
>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>
>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>
>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>number
>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>
>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>
>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your flimsy
>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>
> You mean just
>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied about
>> having
>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>
>
>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>
>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>
>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>
> You are way too stupid
>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>
>And you are a waste of good air.
>
> Your status as an utter moron was
>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of stupidity.
>
>Have some more cake.
>
> You
>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more meaningful
>> life
>> away from RAO.
>>
>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on Lipo
>suction or join a gym.
>
>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>> Internet.
>
>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put out of
>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a NG.
>
>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>
>Let me think about it for a minute.
>
>Hmmmmm. NO.

I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a place
where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron, and an
illiterate. I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You, however, have
devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught lying, tries
a different strategy. You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
and over even though they've been completely exposed.

Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your situation, I
have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control. Unstable blood
sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor judgment,
and a complete lack of self-awareness. People are lining up to take shots at
you right now because you are such an easy target. Your logic and reasoning
skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.

I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.

Boon

[Bruce J. Richman]

>Subject: Re: duh! Or, Is ParanoaT Catching?
>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/24/2004 2:50 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: . net>
>
>
>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>> will see that happen.
>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>
>>
>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>> as a plagiarizer.
>>
>When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>
>

I JUST LOVE TO TELL A LIE - by Pinocchio McKelvy

(to the tune of It's A Sin to Tell A Lie)


You all know that whenever I'm talking
I just love to tell a lie
Telling the truth is not needed
When I lie, I think I've succeeded

Please don't think that I'm totally useless
Just because the truth I deny
You all know that whenever I'm talking
I just love to tell a lie/.

Cross my heart, and I hope to die
I'll never, never ever tell another bad lie
Tried to tell some people 'bout a man I've smeared
But they laughed and taunted me just like I feared
Many called me stupid and perhaps insane
Since I'm in denial, I could feel no pain
Then I tried to sell some phony evidence
But, as usual, all agreed I made no sense.

If the facts prove that I've been wrong
I will apologize
But that will not ever happen
"Cause those lousy facts are just lies !
I'm sure of all my conclusions
They're based on all my delusions

You all know that whenever I'm talking
I just love to tell a lie
Telling the truth is not needed
When I lie, I think I've succeeded


Please don't think that I'm totally useless
Just because the truth I deny
You all know that whenever I'm talking
I just love to tell a lie







Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

Mr. Phillips wrote:


>McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are more
>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr.
>>>>> Richman's
>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>> pictures
>>>>> of
>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me $1000,
>>>>> plus
>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I
>>>>> will
>>>>> pay
>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>
>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>
>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>number
>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>
>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>
>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your flimsy
>
>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>
>> You mean just
>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied about
>>> having
>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>
>>
>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>
>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>
>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>
>> You are way too stupid
>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>
>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>
>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of stupidity.
>>
>>Have some more cake.
>>
>> You
>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more meaningful
>>> life
>>> away from RAO.
>>>
>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on Lipo
>>suction or join a gym.
>>
>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>> Internet.
>>
>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put out of
>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a NG.
>>
>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>
>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>
>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>
>I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a place
>where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron, and an
>illiterate. I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard,
>but
>with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You, however, have
>devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught lying,
>tries
>a different strategy. You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>
>Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your situation, I
>have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control. Unstable blood
>sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>judgment,
>and a complete lack of self-awareness. People are lining up to take shots at
>you right now because you are such an easy target. Your logic and reasoning
>skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>
>I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
>honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>
>Boon
>
>

In addition to the possible medical explanations that you cite, there is at
least one other possibility - and I know this from both clinical and
unfortunately for me, personal, experience. IIRC, McKelvy also has problems
with arthritis. It is not unusual for arthritis sufferers to be prescribed
anti-inflammatory medications, some of which contain steroids. It's long been
known that steroids can induce rage reactions and impulisve anger.



Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

George M. Middius wrote:




>Marc Phillips said:
>
>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a place
>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron, and
>an
>> illiterate.
>
>Mikey knows he needs to be punished.
>

Could this be Mikey's favorite song?

http://www.guntheranderson.com/v/data/themasoc.htm



Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

Mr. Phillips wrote:


>McKelvy said:
>
>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> .net...
>>>> Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>
>>>> My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>> number I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>
>>> Why in the **** would anyone trust 'you'?.
>>>
>>What's too [sic] trust? Either he gets the numbers right or not.
>
>Wow. I couldn't ask for a nicer Christmas present from you. If you take the
>"to" from the other post and switch it with the "too" from this one, it'll
>all
>be fixed!
>
>You've taken ****ing up to a whole new level of perfection.
>
>Boon
>
>
>

Then too, there's the not so insignificant matter of his lying about me for
over 7 years. And this fool thinks anybody will trust his phony promises?
GMAFB !!!!



Bruce J. Richman

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>> will see that happen.
>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>
>>
>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>> as a plagiarizer.
>>
> When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>\
You just did.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr.
>>>>> Richman's
>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>> pictures
>>>>> of
>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me
>>>>> $1000,
>>>>> plus
>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I
>>>>> will
>>>>> pay
>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>
>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>
>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>number
>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>
>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>
>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your
>>flimsy
>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>
>> You mean just
>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied about
>>> having
>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>
>>
>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>
>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>
>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>
>> You are way too stupid
>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>
>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>
>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of stupidity.
>>
>>Have some more cake.
>>
>> You
>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more meaningful
>>> life
>>> away from RAO.
>>>
>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on Lipo
>>suction or join a gym.
>>
>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>> Internet.
>>
>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put out
>>of
>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a NG.
>>
>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>
>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>
>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>
> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a
> place
> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron, and
> an
> illiterate.

I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.

I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You, however,
> have
> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught lying,
> tries
> a different strategy.

Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.

You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>

More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.

> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
> situation, I
> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control. Unstable blood
> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
> judgment,
> and a complete lack of self-awareness.

Save the excuses for yourself.

People are lining up to take shots at
> you right now because you are such an easy target.

Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do. Because
it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.

Your logic and reasoning
> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>
Call me when your develop.

> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>
No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.

Merry ****ing Christmas.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> ink.net...
>>>>
>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
>>>>> underpants
>>>>> of life.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny.
>>>
>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>
> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>
> Boon
>
>
Now you're hearing things too?

I think you're lying.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>
>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny.
>>>>
>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>
>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>
>> Boon
>>
>>
>Now you're hearing things too?

That didn't make any sense, Mikey.

>
>I think you're lying.

Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone else is
lying, too.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are
>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr.
>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me
>>>>>> $1000,
>>>>>> plus
>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> pay
>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>
>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>
>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>>number
>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>
>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>
>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your
>>>flimsy
>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>
>>> You mean just
>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied about
>>>> having
>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>
>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>
>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>
>>> You are way too stupid
>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>
>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>
>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of stupidity.
>>>
>>>Have some more cake.
>>>
>>> You
>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more meaningful
>>>> life
>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>
>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on Lipo
>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>
>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>>> Internet.
>>>
>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put out
>>>of
>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a NG.
>>>
>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>
>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>
>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>
>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a
>> place
>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron, and
>> an
>> illiterate.
>
>I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.

I don't think you're properly qualified to recognize a false allegation.

>
> I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
>> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You, however,
>> have
>> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught lying,
>> tries
>> a different strategy.
>
>Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.

You lied when you said you read Arny's initial post about the child pornography
e-mail, and then went on to maintain that Arny never admitted to storing the
images in his hard drive for three years.

You also have lied about contacting Dr. Richman.

>
> You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>
>
>More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.

I've made up my mind, as always, because of the facts. I've proved it time and
time again. And you've always just contradicted what I've said without any
proof of your own. You're a lazy thinker.

>
>> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
>> situation, I
>> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control. Unstable blood
>> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>> judgment,
>> and a complete lack of self-awareness.
>
>Save the excuses for yourself.

Sounds like you're in denial.

>
> People are lining up to take shots at
>> you right now because you are such an easy target.
>
>Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do. Because
>it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.

Because you're an idiot. Because you're too stupid to recognize it. Because
you keep blathering on and on without saying anything new. Because you're an
Internet clown, someone to ridicule because you're ridiculous.

>
> Your logic and reasoning
>> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>
>Call me when your develop.

Develop what? Really, this is the perfect example of how pathetic you are. No
one even knows what you're talking about anymore.

>
>> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
>> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>
>No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.

You have no idea about who I am, what I do, or what I'm capable of doing. If
you and I met in person, I'm sure you would stop saying this ridiculous things.

>
>Merry ****ing Christmas.

Whatever, Mikey. The best present to give to your family is to get off RAO.
You're a lost cause.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Mr. Middius said:

>Marc Phillips said:
>
>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a place
>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron, and
>an
>> illiterate.
>
>Mikey knows he needs to be punished.

Well, that's always been the case for Arny and Howard. Mikey, however, is
completely oblivious that he's being punished.

Boon

[Bruce J. Richman]

Mr. Phillips wrote:


>McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are
>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr.
>>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me
>>>>>>> $1000,
>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> pay
>>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>>>number
>>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>>
>>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your
>>>>flimsy
>>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>>
>>>> You mean just
>>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied about
>>>>> having
>>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
>>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>>
>>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>>
>>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>>
>>>> You are way too stupid
>>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>>
>>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>>
>>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of stupidity.
>>>>
>>>>Have some more cake.
>>>>
>>>> You
>>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more meaningful
>>>>> life
>>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>>
>>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on Lipo
>>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>>
>>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>>>> Internet.
>>>>
>>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put out
>>>>of
>>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a NG.
>>>>
>>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>>
>>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>>
>>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>>
>>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a
>>> place
>>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron, and
>
>>> an
>>> illiterate.
>>
>>I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.
>
>I don't think you're properly qualified to recognize a false allegation.
>

The only qualification he has, which is totally useless in this case, is a 7
year history of making false allegations. In his case, denial is not a river
in Egypt. He reminds me of the little juvenile delinqunt that kills his
parents, gets arrested, and then throws himself at the mercy of the court
because he's an orphan.



>>
>> I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
>>> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You, however,
>>> have
>>> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught lying,
>>> tries
>>> a different strategy.
>>
>>Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.
>
>You lied when you said you read Arny's initial post about the child
>pornography
>e-mail, and then went on to maintain that Arny never admitted to storing the
>images in his hard drive for three years.
>
>You also have lied about contacting Dr. Richman.
>

He's been lying about me for 7 years.

>>
>> You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>>> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>>
>>
>>More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.
>
>I've made up my mind, as always, because of the facts. I've proved it time
>and
>time again. And you've always just contradicted what I've said without any
>proof of your own. You're a lazy thinker.
>
>>
>>> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
>>> situation, I
>>> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control. Unstable blood
>>> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>>> judgment,
>>> and a complete lack of self-awareness.
>>
>>Save the excuses for yourself.
>
>Sounds like you're in denial.
>

And sinking fast.


>>
>> People are lining up to take shots at
>>> you right now because you are such an easy target.
>>
>>Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do. Because
>
>>it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.
>
>Because you're an idiot. Because you're too stupid to recognize it. Because
>you keep blathering on and on without saying anything new. Because you're an
>Internet clown, someone to ridicule because you're ridiculous.
>
>>
>> Your logic and reasoning
>>> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>>
>>Call me when your develop.
>
>Develop what? Really, this is the perfect example of how pathetic you are.
>No
>one even knows what you're talking about anymore.
>
>>
>>> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
>>> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>>
>>No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.
>
>You have no idea about who I am, what I do, or what I'm capable of doing. If
>you and I met in person, I'm sure you would stop saying this ridiculous
>things.
>

McKelvy has never been known to let the facts get in the way of his mission on
RAO - disinformation and libel.



>>
>>Merry ****ing Christmas.
>
>Whatever, Mikey. The best present to give to your family is to get off RAO.
>You're a lost cause.
>
>Boon
>
>





Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

Mr. Phillips wroe:


>Dr. Richman said:
>
>>Mr. Phillips wrote:
>>
>>
>>>McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are
>>more
>>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get Dr.
>>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me
>>$1000,
>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> pay
>>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>>>number
>>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>>
>>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your
>>flimsy
>>>
>>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>>
>>>> You mean just
>>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied about
>
>>>>> having
>>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
>>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>>
>>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>>
>>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>>
>>>> You are way too stupid
>>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>>
>>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>>
>>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of stupidity.
>>>>
>>>>Have some more cake.
>>>>
>>>> You
>>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more meaningful
>
>>>>> life
>>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>>
>>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on Lipo
>>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>>
>>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>>>> Internet.
>>>>
>>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put out
>of
>>
>>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a NG.
>>>>
>>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>>
>>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>>
>>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>>
>>>I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a place
>>>where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron, and
>>an
>>>illiterate. I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard,
>>>but
>>>with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You, however,
>have
>>>devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught lying,
>>>tries
>>>a different strategy. You however, stand there and repeat the same lies
>>over
>>>and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>>
>>>Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your situation,
>>I
>>>have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control. Unstable blood
>>>sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>>>judgment,
>>>and a complete lack of self-awareness. People are lining up to take shots
>>at
>>>you right now because you are such an easy target. Your logic and
>reasoning
>>>skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>>
>>>I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
>>>honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>>
>>>Boon
>>>
>>>
>>
>>In addition to the possible medical explanations that you cite, there is at
>>least one other possibility - and I know this from both clinical and
>>unfortunately for me, personal, experience. IIRC, McKelvy also has problems
>>with arthritis. It is not unusual for arthritis sufferers to be prescribed
>>anti-inflammatory medications, some of which contain steroids. It's long
>>been
>>known that steroids can induce rage reactions and impulisve anger.
>
>That sounds very reasonable. Again, I can't witness Mikey's recent behavior
>on
>this NG and think that there isn't something very wrong with him.
>
>Boon
>
>
>

Even so, his 7 year history of compulsive lying and consistent denial of
concrete evidence strongly indicates that he has several chronic psychological
problems in addition to whatever recent medical problems he may also have. And
some psychiatric problems have a partially organic basis, that gets worst over
time - such as paresis and various other brain disorders.


Bruce J. Richman

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are
>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get
>>>>>>> Dr.
>>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me
>>>>>>> $1000,
>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> pay
>>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>>>number
>>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>>
>>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your
>>>>flimsy
>>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>>
>>>> You mean just
>>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied
>>>>> about
>>>>> having
>>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
>>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>>
>>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>>
>>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>>
>>>> You are way too stupid
>>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>>
>>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>>
>>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of
>>>>> stupidity.
>>>>
>>>>Have some more cake.
>>>>
>>>> You
>>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more
>>>>> meaningful
>>>>> life
>>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>>
>>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on Lipo
>>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>>
>>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>>>> Internet.
>>>>
>>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put out
>>>>of
>>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a
>>>>NG.
>>>>
>>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>>
>>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>>
>>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>>
>>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a
>>> place
>>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron,
>>> and
>>> an
>>> illiterate.
>>
>>I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.
>
> I don't think you're properly qualified to recognize a false allegation.
>
>>
I am when they are directed at me.


>> I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
>>> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You, however,
>>> have
>>> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught
>>> lying,
>>> tries
>>> a different strategy.
>>
>>Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.
>
> You lied when you said you read Arny's initial post about the child
> pornography
> e-mail, and then went on to maintain that Arny never admitted to storing
> the
> images in his hard drive for three years.
>

I did read it no matter how many ****ing times yo claim I didn't.

> You also have lied about contacting Dr. Richman.
>
I haven't contacted him, I phoned a number where nobody answered.
>>
>> You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>>> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>>
>>
>>More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.
>
> I've made up my mind, as always, because of the facts. I've proved it
> time and
> time again. And you've always just contradicted what I've said without
> any
> proof of your own. You're a lazy thinker.
>
Nothing I can say will change your mind it's closed.

If you 'd go over it, you'd see that I've not done anything I should be
defending my self over.

Somebody posted an alleged phone number of BJ's that I found about 3 months
ago, I don't recall now if I read it here or in the Google archive for RAO.
I saved the post and have called that number 3 times. That doesn't mean I
have his number, it means I have a number that might belong to him.

I tried to find a number where a live person would answer the phone, because
I am not convinced that the Richman that started posting here, is the same
as the one who does post here now.

The 2 tries I made got me no hits, when I called At&T 411 on my cel I got
nothing.

My story hasn't changed, nor have the facts, the interpretation of these
facts has taken a few idiots to the hinterlands in their imagination, but
they don't match with reality.

>>
>>> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
>>> situation, I
>>> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control.

I monitor my blood sugar regularly and I can take my glucophage as directed,
I'm not having diabetic moodswings, I'm just tired of being called a liar by
people who lie for pleasure, when they aren't just generally being assholes.

Unstable blood
>>> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>>> judgment,
>>> and a complete lack of self-awareness.
>>

Which explains a lot about you.

>>Save the excuses for yourself.
>
> Sounds like you're in denial.
>
I was about to say that very thing.
>>
>> People are lining up to take shots at
>>> you right now because you are such an easy target.
>>
>>Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do.
>>Because
>>it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.
>
> Because you're an idiot.

Because I wn't admit I'm wrong when I'm not.

Because you're too stupid to recognize it.

Because you say so, not because it's true.

Because
> you keep blathering on and on without saying anything new.

Becuase the facts haven't changed and neither has your tune.

Because you're an
> Internet clown, someone to ridicule because you're ridiculous.
>
>>
Bcecause you have nothing better to do than attack people in order to make
your own pathetic life seem meaningful.

>> Your logic and reasoning
>>> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>>
I see, tell the truth, stick to it and you become an idiot.

>>Call me when your develop.
>
> Develop what?
A conscience, integrity, take your pick.


Really, this is the perfect example of how pathetic you are. No
> one even knows what you're talking about anymore.
>
No surprise there.

>>
>>> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
>>> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>>
>>No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.
>
> You have no idea about who I am, what I do, or what I'm capable of doing.
> If
> you and I met in person, I'm sure you would stop saying this ridiculous
> things.
>
And I should wish to meet a liar and internet geek because of what?
So you can attack me in person? Now that I know what you look like you can
be sure I'll make sure that if you should seek me out, it would be unwise.

>>
>>Merry ****ing Christmas.
>
> Whatever, Mikey. The best present to give to your family is to get off
> RAO.
> You're a lost cause.
>
Better than having personal attacks as your only cause.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny.
>>>>>
>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>
>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>
>>> Boon
>>>
>>>
>>Now you're hearing things too?
>
> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>
>>
Because your an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all."

Sound implies hearing, dimwit.



>>I think you're lying.
>
> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone else
> is
> lying, too.
>
I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an
obnoxious twit.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> ink.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>
>> When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>\
> You just did.
OSAF

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you are
>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get
>>>>>>>> Dr.
>>>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me
>>>>>>>> $1000,
>>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so, I
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> pay
>>>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>>>>number
>>>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>>>
>>>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your
>>>>>flimsy
>>>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean just
>>>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> having
>>>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored child
>>>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>>>
>>>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are way too stupid
>>>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>>>
>>>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of
>>>>>> stupidity.
>>>>>
>>>>>Have some more cake.
>>>>>
>>>>> You
>>>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more
>>>>>> meaningful
>>>>>> life
>>>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on Lipo
>>>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>>>
>>>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>>>>> Internet.
>>>>>
>>>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put out
>>>>>of
>>>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a
>>>>>NG.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>>>
>>>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>>>
>>>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a
>>>> place
>>>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron,
>>>> and
>>>> an
>>>> illiterate.
>>>
>>>I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.
>>
>> I don't think you're properly qualified to recognize a false allegation.
>>
>>>
>I am when they are directed at me.

Not when you're so delusional that you don't understand them.

>
>
>>> I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
>>>> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You, however,
>>>> have
>>>> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught
>>>> lying,
>>>> tries
>>>> a different strategy.
>>>
>>>Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.
>>
>> You lied when you said you read Arny's initial post about the child
>> pornography
>> e-mail, and then went on to maintain that Arny never admitted to storing
>> the
>> images in his hard drive for three years.
>>
>
>I did read it no matter how many ****ing times yo claim I didn't.

Yo? Well, at any rate, your reading comprehension level is invariably in the
toilet at this point. You're either illiterate, or a liar. Which is it?

>
>> You also have lied about contacting Dr. Richman.
>>
>I haven't contacted him, I phoned a number where nobody answered.

And yet I offered to contact him for you. And you declined, because that would
shut down your little public spasm, wouldn't it.

>>>
>>> You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>>>> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>>>
>>>
>>>More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.
>>
>> I've made up my mind, as always, because of the facts. I've proved it
>> time and
>> time again. And you've always just contradicted what I've said without
>> any
>> proof of your own. You're a lazy thinker.
>>
>Nothing I can say will change your mind it's closed.

Shouldn't there be a comma in that sentence? You sound like a child.

>
>If you 'd go over it, you'd see that I've not done anything I should be
>defending my self over.

Dude, you're self-destructing. I'm worried that if I keep pushing you, your
head will explode. Now try to construct some sentences correctly. Take your
time. Don't rush.

>
>Somebody posted an alleged phone number of BJ's that I found about 3 months
>ago, I don't recall now if I read it here or in the Google archive for RAO.
>I saved the post and have called that number 3 times. That doesn't mean I
>have his number, it means I have a number that might belong to him.

Who gives a ****?

>
>I tried to find a number where a live person would answer the phone, because
>I am not convinced that the Richman that started posting here, is the same
>as the one who does post here now.

Who gives a ****?

>
>The 2 tries I made got me no hits, when I called At&T 411 on my cel I got
>nothing.
>
>My story hasn't changed, nor have the facts, the interpretation of these
>facts has taken a few idiots to the hinterlands in their imagination, but
>they don't match with reality.

Then why has everyone here pointed out your mistake to you? Why don't you
understand it?

>
>>>
>>>> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
>>>> situation, I
>>>> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control.
>
>I monitor my blood sugar regularly and I can take my glucophage as directed,
>I'm not having diabetic moodswings, I'm just tired of being called a liar by
>people who lie for pleasure, when they aren't just generally being assholes.

Who are these imaginary liars you're talking about?

>
> Unstable blood
>>>> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>>>> judgment,
>>>> and a complete lack of self-awareness.
>>>
>
>Which explains a lot about you.
>
>>>Save the excuses for yourself.
>>
>> Sounds like you're in denial.
>>
>I was about to say that very thing.

Oh, so we're back to IKYABWAIs. Guess that's the most we'll ever get out of a
cretin like you, eh, Mikey?

>>>
>>> People are lining up to take shots at
>>>> you right now because you are such an easy target.
>>>
>>>Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do.
>>>Because
>>>it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.
>>
>> Because you're an idiot.
>
>Because I wn't admit I'm wrong when I'm not.

Or when you are.

>
> Because you're too stupid to recognize it.
>
>Because you say so, not because it's true.

Or because you don't want to believe it.

>
> Because
>> you keep blathering on and on without saying anything new.
>
>Becuase the facts haven't changed and neither has your tune.

Try to get through one sentence without ****ing it up. If you can, that is.

>
> Because you're an
>> Internet clown, someone to ridicule because you're ridiculous.
>>
>>>
>Bcecause you have nothing better to do than attack people in order to make
>your own pathetic life seem meaningful.

I get it. The madder you get, the less you are able to express yourself.
That's why I suggest that you take a vacation from the group.

>
>>> Your logic and reasoning
>>>> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>>>
>I see, tell the truth, stick to it and you become an idiot.

You can tell yourself whatever your want. All I'm asking you to do is to ask
your wife to read your posts and tell you what she thinks. If you won't
believe us, maybe you'll believe her.

>
>>>Call me when your develop.
>>
>> Develop what?
>A conscience, integrity, take your pick.

What's your number? I'll call you right now. My conscience and integrity have
always been intact. You're the one who appears to be falling apart before our
eyes.

>
>
> Really, this is the perfect example of how pathetic you are. No
>> one even knows what you're talking about anymore.
>>
>No surprise there.

Good, some progress at last.

>
>>>
>>>> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
>>>> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>>>
>>>No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.
>>
>> You have no idea about who I am, what I do, or what I'm capable of doing.
>> If
>> you and I met in person, I'm sure you would stop saying this ridiculous
>> things.
>>
>And I should wish to meet a liar and internet geek because of what?
>So you can attack me in person? Now that I know what you look like you can
>be sure I'll make sure that if you should seek me out, it would be unwise.

Why? Are you that afraid of me? Or are you just afraid of having to be
accountable for the idiotic things that you say on the Internet?

>
>>>
>>>Merry ****ing Christmas.
>>
>> Whatever, Mikey. The best present to give to your family is to get off
>> RAO.
>> You're a lost cause.
>>
>Better than having personal attacks as your only cause.

I agree. But what does that have to do with anything?

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> link.net...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
>>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>>
>>> When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>>\
>> You just did.
> OSAF
>

You hypocritical pile of ****. When you made all your accusations against
Richman's credentials, at the time you made them, you did not label them as
opinions.
When threatened about itbeing libelous later, you backed down
and tried to excuse yourself by presenting them
as mere opinions.

Can you see your hypocrucy? Can You? Look real hard, see it??
Take a long deep look into your soul. We canm all see it easily, you, you
are blind.

Merry Christmas!

[Bruce J. Richman]

Clyde Slick wrote:


>"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> link.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
>>>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>>>
>>>> When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>>>\
>>> You just did.
>> OSAF
>>
>
>You hypocritical pile of ****. When you made all your accusations against
>Richman's credentials, at the time you made them, you did not label them as
>opinions.
>When threatened about itbeing libelous later, you backed down
>and tried to excuse yourself by presenting them
>as mere opinions.
>
>Can you see your hypocrucy? Can You? Look real hard, see it??
>Take a long deep look into your soul. We canm all see it easily, you, you
>are blind.
>
>Merry Christmas!
>
>

Well stated. This hypocritical, sociopathic liar continues to deny his 7 year
campaign of libel and deliberate avoidance and denial of concrete evidence
presented a number of tkimes. His pathetic attempts to call his blatant lies
"opinions" didn't fool anybody, and if we ever end up in a courtroom, they
won't fool a judge or jury either. He's been challenged to present his
libelous false claims to either the appropriate legal authorities and/or
regulartory professional boards in Florida, since impersonation of a
psychologist - one of many libelous false claims he's made - is a crime.
Needless to say, he hasn't done so, because he knows what the outcome will be.
He's also been challenged to publish his agenda-driven bull**** about me in an
American print publication. Again, no response from this pathological liar,
because he knows what the outcome will be.

And now, in a further demonstration of his total lack of honesty, he tries to
sell a bogus "proposal" about not talking about me or my background if certain
conditions are met. The only condition that needs to be met is his decisiion
to tell the truth for once in his miserable RAO existence. Or a decision to
stop his 7 year campaign of libel and character assassination. Nothing else is
needed - and it requires no action on my part.



Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

good beef roast if the haunch
it is in any way diseased. But sometimes surgeons make mistakes,
and if a healthy young limb is at hand, then don?t hesitate to cook
it to perfection!

1 high quality limb, rack, or roast
Potatoes, carrot
Oil
celery
onions
green onions
parsley
garlic
salt, pepper, etc
2 cups beef stock

Marinate meat (optional, not necessary with better cuts).
Season liberally and lace with garlic cloves by making incisions,
and placing whole cloves deep into the meat.
Grease a baking pan, and fill with a thick bed of onions,
celery, green onions, and parsley.
Place roast on top with fat side up.
Place uncovered in 500° oven for 20 minutes, reduce oven to 325°.
Bake till medium rare (150°) and let roast rest.
Pour stock over onions and drippings, carve the meat and
place the slices in the au jus.



Bisque à l?Enfant

Honor the memory of Grandma with this dish by utilizing her good
silver soup tureen and her great grandchildren (crawfish, crab or
lobster will work just as well, however this dish is classically
made with crawfish).

Stuffed infant heads, stuffed crawfish heads, stuffed crab or lobster shells;
make patties if shell or head is not available
(such as with packaged crawfish, crab, or headless baby).
Flour
oil
onions
bell peppers
garlic salt, pepper, etc.
3 cups chicken stock
2 sticks butter
3 tablespoons oil

First stuff the heads, or make the patties (see index)
then fry or bake.
Set aside to drain on paper towels.
Make a roux with butter

[Michael McKelvy]

overnight.
Get the grill good and hot while placing meat, vegetables, and
fruit such as pineapples or cherries on the skewers.
Don?t be afraid to use a variety of meats.
Grill to medium rare,
serve with garlic cous-cous and sautéed asparagus.
Coffee and sherbet for desert then walnuts, cheese, and port.
Cigars for the gentlemen (and ladies if they so desire)!



Crock-Pot Crack Baby

When the quivering, hopelessly addicted crack baby succumbs to death,
get him immediately butchered and into the crock-pot, so that any
remaining toxins will not be fatal. But don?t cook it too long,
because like Blowfish, there is a perfect medium between the poisonous
and the stimulating. Though it may not have the same effect on your
guests, a whole chicken cooked in this fashion is also mighty tasty.

1 newborn - cocaine addicted, freshly expired, cleaned and butchered
Carrots
onions
leeks
celery
bell pepper
potatoes
Salt
pepper
garlic, etc
4 cups water

Cut the meat into natural pieces and brown very well in olive oil,
remove, then brown half of the onions, the bell pepper, and celery.
When brown, mix everything into the crock-pot, and in 6 to 8 h

[Michael McKelvy]

about 6 minutes on each side.



Shish Kababes

As old as the hills, this technique has employed seafood, beef, pork, lamb,
poultry, and vegetables; just about anything can be grilled, and young humans
are no exception!

High quality marinade (Teriyaki and garlic perhaps)
1 inch cubes of tender meat, preferably from the nursery
Onions
bell peppers
Wooden or metal skewers

Marinate the meat overnight.
Get the grill good and hot while placing meat, vegetables, and
fruit such as pineapples or cherries on the skewers.
Don?t be afraid to use a variety of meats.
Grill to medium rare,
serve with garlic cous-cous and sautéed asparagus.
Coffee and sherbet for desert then walnuts, cheese, and port.
Cigars for the gentlemen (and ladies if they so desire)!



Crock-Pot Crack Baby

When the quivering, hopelessly addicted crack baby succumbs to death,
get him immediately butchered and into the crock-pot, so that any
remaining toxins will not be fatal. But don?t cook it too long,
because like Blowfish, there is a perfect medium between the poisonous
and the stimulating. Though it may not have the same effect on your
guests, a whole chicken cooked in this fashion is also mighty tasty.

1 newborn - cocaine addicted, freshly expired, cleaned and butchered
Carrots
onions
leeks
celery
bell pepper
potatoes
Salt
pepper
garlic, etc
4 cups water

Cut the meat into natural pieces and brown very well in olive oil,
remo

[George M. Middius]

and fourth from the
service stations.



Roast Leg of Amputee

By all means, substitute lamb or a good beef roast if the haunch
it is in any way diseased. But sometimes surgeons make mistakes,
and if a healthy young limb is at hand, then don?t hesitate to cook
it to perfection!

1 high quality limb, rack, or roast
Potatoes, carrot
Oil
celery
onions
green onions
parsley
garlic
salt, pepper, etc
2 cups beef stock

Marinate meat (optional, not necessary with better cuts).
Season liberally and lace with garlic cloves by making incisions,
and placing whole cloves deep into the meat.
Grease a baking pan, and fill with a thick bed of onions,
celery, green onions, and parsley.
Place roast on top with fat side up.
Place uncovered in 500° oven for 20 minutes, reduce oven to 325°.
Bake till medium rare (150°) and let roast rest.
Pour stock over onions and drippings, carve the meat and
place the slices in the au jus.



Bisque à l?Enfant

Honor the memory of Grandma with this dish by utilizing her good
silver soup tureen and her great grandchildren (crawfish, crab or
lobster will work just as well, however this dish is classically
made with crawfish).

Stuffed inf

[Marc Phillips]

hospital, nursery, or morgue;
you can at least get rid of all the leftovers in your refrigerator.

1 - 2 lbs. cubed meat (human flesh, chicken, turkey, beef...)
1 -2 lbs. coarsely chopped vegetables
(carrots, potatoes, turnips, cauliflower, cabbage...)
Bell pepper
onions
garlic
ginger
salt pepper, etc.
Olive oil
butter

Brown the meat and some chopped onions, peppers, and garilic in olive oil,
place in baking dish, layer with vegetables seasoning and butter.
Bake at 325° for 30 - 45 minutes.
Serve with hot dinner rolls, fruit salad and sparkling water.



Bébé Buffet 1

Show off with whole roasted children replete with apples in mouths -
and babies? heads stuffed with wild rice. Or keep it simple with a
hearty main course such as stew, lasagna, or meat loaf.

Some suggestions

Pre-mie pot pies, beef stew, leg of lamb, stuffed chicken, roast pork spiral ham,
Cranberry pineapple salad, sweet potatoes in butter, vegetable platter, tossed salad with tomato and avocado, parsley new potatoes, spinich cucumber salad, fruit salad
Bran muffins, dinner rolls, soft breadsticks, rice pilaf, croissants
Apple cake with rum sauce, frosted banana nut bread sherbet, home made brownies
Iced tea, water, beer, bloody marys, lemonade, coffee

The guests select food, beverages, silverware... everything from the buffet table.
They move to wherever they are comfortable, and sit with whoever they choose.
Provide trays so your guests will not spill everything all over your house from
carrying too much, nor will they have to make 10 trips back and fourth from the
service stations.



Roast Leg of Amputee

By all means, substitute lamb or a good beef roast if the haunch
it is in any way diseased. But sometimes surgeons make mistakes,
and if a healthy young limb is at hand, then don?t hesitate to cook

[Clyde Slick]

trays so your guests will not spill everything all over your house from
carrying too much, nor will they have to make 10 trips back and fourth from the
service stations.



Roast Leg of Amputee

By all means, substitute lamb or a good beef roast if the haunch
it is in any way diseased. But sometimes surgeons make mistakes,
and if a healthy young limb is at hand, then don?t hesitate to cook
it to perfection!

1 high quality limb, rack, or roast
Potatoes, carrot
Oil
celery
onions
green onions
parsley
garlic
salt, pepper, etc
2 cups beef stock

Marinate meat (optional, not necessary with better cuts).
Season liberally and lace with garlic cloves by making incisions,
and placing whole cloves deep into the meat.
Grease a baking pan, and fill with a thick bed of onions,
celery, green onions, and parsley.
Place roast on top with fat side up.
Place uncovered in 500° oven for 20 minutes, reduce oven to 325°.
Bake till medium rare (150°) and let roast rest.
Pour stock over onions and drippings, carve the meat and
place the slices in the au jus.



Bisque à l?Enfant

Honor the memory of Grandma with this dish by utilizing her good
silver soup tureen and her great grandchildren (crawfis

[Marc Phillips]

of protein.

2 human baby rib racks
3 cups barbecue sauce or honey glaze (see index)
Salt
black pepper
white pepper
paprika

Remove the silverskin by loosening from the edges,
then stripping off.
Season generously, rubbing the mixture into the baby?s flesh.
Place 1 quart water in a baking pan, the meat on a wire rack.
Bake uncovered in 250° oven for 1½ hours.
When browned, remove and glaze,
return to oven and bake 20 minutes more to form a glaze.
Cut ribs into individual pieces and serve with extra sauce.



Fresh Sausage

If it becomes necessary to hide the fact that you are eating
human babies, this is the perfect solution.
But if you are still paranoid, you can substitute pork butt.

5 lb. lean chuck roast
3 lb. prime baby butt
2 tablespoons each:
salt
black, white and cayenne peppers
celery salt
garlic powder
parsley flakes
brown sugar
1 teaspoon sage
2 onions
6 cloves garlic
bunch green onions, chopped

Cut the children?s butts and the beef roast into pieces
that will fit in the grinder.

[Michael McKelvy]

Brown the meat and some chopped onions, peppers, and garilic in olive oil,
place in baking dish, layer with vegetables seasoning and butter.
Bake at 325° for 30 - 45 minutes.
Serve with hot dinner rolls, fruit salad and sparkling water.



Bébé Buffet 1

Show off with whole roasted children replete with apples in mouths -
and babies? heads stuffed with wild rice. Or keep it simple with a
hearty main course such as stew, lasagna, or meat loaf.

Some suggestions

Pre-mie pot pies, beef stew, leg of lamb, stuffed chicken, roast pork spiral ham,
Cranberry pineapple salad, sweet potatoes in butter, vegetable platter, tossed salad with tomato and avocado, parsley new potatoes, spinich cucumber salad, fruit salad
Bran muffins, dinner rolls, soft breadsticks, rice pilaf, croissants
Apple cake with rum sauce, frosted banana nut bread sherbet, home made brownies
Iced tea, water, beer, bloody marys, lemonade, coffee

The guests select food, beverages, silverware... everything from the buffet table.
They move to wherever they are comfortable, and sit with whoever they choose.
Provide trays so your guests will not spill everything all over your house from
carrying too much, nor will they have to make 10 trips back and fourth from the
service stations.



Roast Leg of Amputee

By all means, substitute lamb or a good beef roast if the haunch
it is in any way diseased. But sometimes surgeons make mistakes,
and if a healthy young limb is at hand, then don?t hesitate to cook
it to perfection!

1

[S888Wheel]

>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/24/2004 11:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: . net>
>
>
>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>> will see that happen.
>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>
>>
>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>> as a plagiarizer.
>>
>When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.



So you never lie or make a mistake. What a burden it must be to be the only
perfect person in the world.

[Clyde Slick]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/24/2004 11:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: . net>
>>
>>
>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> ink.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>
>>When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>
>
>
> So you never lie or make a mistake. What a burden it must be to be the
> only
> perfect person in the world.

One day, when Mikey's got his nose
stuck way deep up Arny's ass, the Beast will let out
an uncontrollable rage of dhiarrea. That will be a sight to behold.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
>>>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Boon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Now you're hearing things too?
>>>
>>> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>>>
>>>>
>>Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at
> all."
>>
>>Sound implies hearing, dimwit.
>
> And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic grammar
> error.
> Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately.
>
That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like spelling.

>>
>>>>I think you're lying.
>>>
>>> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone else
>>> is
>>> lying, too.
>>>
>>I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an
>>obnoxious twit.
>
> OSAF.
>
> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others, do
> you.
>
I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> link.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his
>>>>> head
>>>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>>>
>>>> When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>>>\
>>> You just did.
>> OSAF
>>
>
> You hypocritical pile of ****. When you made all your accusations against
> Richman's credentials, at the time you made them, you did not label them
> as opinions.
> When threatened about itbeing libelous later, you backed down
> and tried to excuse yourself by presenting them
> as mere opinions.
>

They were always opinions.

> Can you see your hypocrucy?

Careful, Boon will thnk you're an idiot if you make spelling mistakes.

Can You? Look real hard, see it??
> Take a long deep look into your soul. We canm all see it easily, you, you
> are blind.
>
> Merry Christmas!
>
If you could look into your own soul, I believe you see something you
wouldn't be proud of.

[Michael McKelvy]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/24/2004 11:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: . net>
>>
>>
>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> ink.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>
>>When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>
>
>
> So you never lie

I haven't done so here. I haven't lied about the process of trying to
verify BJ's identity.



or make a mistake.

I make mistakes, probably more than my share.

What a burden it must be to be the only
> perfect person in the world.

Never claimed to be.

[S888Wheel]

>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/26/2004 12:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: . net>
>
>
>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>Date: 12/24/2004 11:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>
>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his head
>>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>>
>>>When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>
>>
>>
>> So you never lie
>
>I haven't done so here. I haven't lied about the process of trying to
>verify BJ's identity.
>
>
>
> or make a mistake.
>
>I make mistakes, probably more than my share.
>
>What a burden it must be to be the only
>> perfect person in the world.
>
>Never claimed to be.
>
>
"When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that."

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
> ...


>>
>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others, do
>> you.
>>
> I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.
So, by your own definition, you are a thug!

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...

>>
> If you could look into your own soul, I believe you see something you
> wouldn't be proud of.
>

"At least" I have a soul.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
>
> What a burden it must be to be the only
>> perfect person in the world.
>
> Never claimed to be.

To paraphrase a Presidential debate question,
what are the three greatest mistakes you made on RAO?

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
>>>>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>Now you're hearing things too?
>>>>
>>>> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at
>> all."
>>>
>>>Sound implies hearing, dimwit.
>>
>> And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic grammar
>> error.
>> Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately.
>>
>That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like spelling.
>
>>>
>>>>>I think you're lying.
>>>>
>>>> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone else
>>>> is
>>>> lying, too.
>>>>
>>>I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an
>>>obnoxious twit.
>>
>> OSAF.
>>
>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others, do
>> you.
>>
>I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.

So you consider yourself a thug.

Boon

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> hlink.net...
>>
>> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>> ...
>
>
>>>
>>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others, do
>>> you.
>>>
>> I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.
> So, by your own definition, you are a thug!
>
I just love how you find meaning never implied.

Proper reading would indicate that it Mr. Phillips and others who are the
thugs.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
>>>>>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now you're hearing things too?
>>>>>
>>>>> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound stupid
>>>>at
>>> all."
>>>>
>>>>Sound implies hearing, dimwit.
>>>
>>> And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic grammar
>>> error.
>>> Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately.
>>>
>>That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like spelling.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>I think you're lying.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone
>>>>> else
>>>>> is
>>>>> lying, too.
>>>>>
>>>>I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an
>>>>obnoxious twit.
>>>
>>> OSAF.
>>>
>>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others, do
>>> you.
>>>
>>I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.
>
> So you consider yourself a thug.
>
No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive
move.

[Michael McKelvy]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/26/2004 12:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: . net>
>>
>>
>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>Date: 12/24/2004 11:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his
>>>>> head
>>>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>>>
>>>>When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So you never lie
>>
>>I haven't done so here. I haven't lied about the process of trying to
>>verify BJ's identity.
>>
>>
>>
>> or make a mistake.
>>
>>I make mistakes, probably more than my share.
>>
>>What a burden it must be to be the only
>>> perfect person in the world.
>>
>>Never claimed to be.
>>
>>
> "When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that."

Which is not the same as saying I never do wrong, just that I'm not in this
case.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>
>>
>> What a burden it must be to be the only
>>> perfect person in the world.
>>
>> Never claimed to be.
>
> To paraphrase a Presidential debate question,
> what are the three greatest mistakes you made on RAO?
>
Assuming there was agreement on audio matters.
Reading anything by Middius.
Assuming that everyone can be reasoned with.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
>>>>>>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>>>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now you're hearing things too?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound stupid
>>>>>at
>>>> all."
>>>>>
>>>>>Sound implies hearing, dimwit.
>>>>
>>>> And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic grammar
>>>> error.
>>>> Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately.
>>>>
>>>That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like spelling.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>I think you're lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone
>>>>>> else
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> lying, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an
>>>>>obnoxious twit.
>>>>
>>>> OSAF.
>>>>
>>>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others, do
>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.
>>
>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>
>No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive
>move.

So, in your opinion, two wrongs make a right.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...
>>
>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>
> No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive
> move.
>

More Mc Kelvy lies, hypocricy and lack of self awareness.What about the rest
of us
defending against Arny's ****, he was slinging
feces before a lot of us were ever reading RAO.

[S888Wheel]

>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/26/2004 11:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: . net>
>
>
>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>Date: 12/26/2004 12:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>
>>>
>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>Date: 12/24/2004 11:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his
>>>>>> head
>>>>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>>>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you never lie
>>>
>>>I haven't done so here. I haven't lied about the process of trying to
>>>verify BJ's identity.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> or make a mistake.
>>>
>>>I make mistakes, probably more than my share.
>>>
>>>What a burden it must be to be the only
>>>> perfect person in the world.
>>>
>>>Never claimed to be.
>>>
>>>
>> "When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that."
>
>Which is not the same as saying I never do wrong,

Yes it is.

just that I'm not in this
>case.
>

Ah, part of your problem is you don't know what words mean. Who knows what you
are actually saying when you tell us you never lie or get things wrong.

[Bruce J. Richman]

Scott Wheeler wrote:


>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/26/2004 11:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: . net>
>>
>>
>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>Date: 12/26/2004 12:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>Date: 12/24/2004 11:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>>>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his
>>>>>>> head
>>>>>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>>>>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So you never lie
>>>>
>>>>I haven't done so here. I haven't lied about the process of trying to
>>>>verify BJ's identity.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> or make a mistake.
>>>>
>>>>I make mistakes, probably more than my share.
>>>>
>>>>What a burden it must be to be the only
>>>>> perfect person in the world.
>>>>
>>>>Never claimed to be.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> "When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that."
>>
>>Which is not the same as saying I never do wrong,
>
>Yes it is.
>
> just that I'm not in this
>>case.
>>
>
>Ah, part of your problem is you don't know what words mean. Who knows what
>you
>are actually saying when you tell us you never lie or get things wrong.
>
>

Whatever the meaning, we can be pretty sure that his statements arfe false, and
that they've been approved in Detroit.



Bruce J. Richman

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you
>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get
>>>>>>>>> Dr.
>>>>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me
>>>>>>>>> $1000,
>>>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so,
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> pay
>>>>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>>>>>number
>>>>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your
>>>>>>flimsy
>>>>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean just
>>>>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored
>>>>>>> child
>>>>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are way too stupid
>>>>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of
>>>>>>> stupidity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Have some more cake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You
>>>>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more
>>>>>>> meaningful
>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on
>>>>>>Lipo
>>>>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>>>>>> Internet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put
>>>>>>out
>>>>>>of
>>>>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a
>>>>>>NG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a
>>>>> place
>>>>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron,
>>>>> and
>>>>> an
>>>>> illiterate.
>>>>
>>>>I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.
>>>
>>> I don't think you're properly qualified to recognize a false allegation.
>>>
>>>>
>>I am when they are directed at me.
>
> Not when you're so delusional that you don't understand them.
>
>>
>>
>>>> I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
>>>>> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You,
>>>>> however,
>>>>> have
>>>>> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught
>>>>> lying,
>>>>> tries
>>>>> a different strategy.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.
>>>
>>> You lied when you said you read Arny's initial post about the child
>>> pornography
>>> e-mail, and then went on to maintain that Arny never admitted to storing
>>> the
>>> images in his hard drive for three years.
>>>
>>
>>I did read it no matter how many ****ing times yo claim I didn't.
>
> Yo? Well, at any rate, your reading comprehension level is invariably in
> the
> toilet at this point. You're either illiterate, or a liar. Which is it?
>
An imperfect typist.
>>
>>> You also have lied about contacting Dr. Richman.
>>>
>>I haven't contacted him, I phoned a number where nobody answered.
>
> And yet I offered to contact him for you. And you declined, because that
> would
> shut down your little public spasm, wouldn't it.
>

I declined because I don't trust you. My method doesn't require me to trust
anybody, either he can do it or not.
>>>>
>>>> You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>>>>> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.
>>>
>>> I've made up my mind, as always, because of the facts. I've proved it
>>> time and
>>> time again. And you've always just contradicted what I've said without
>>> any
>>> proof of your own. You're a lazy thinker.
>>>
>>Nothing I can say will change your mind it's closed.
>
> Shouldn't there be a comma in that sentence? You sound like a child.
>
You sound like someone who has lost on the facts so now you attack the
grammar. You migt want to check BJ's posts, he's at least as bad at typos.
>>
>>If you 'd go over it, you'd see that I've not done anything I should be
>>defending my self over.
>
> Dude, you're self-destructing. I'm worried that if I keep pushing you,
> your
> head will explode.

Looking at you picture, you seem far closer to that than I.

Now try to construct some sentences correctly. Take your
> time. Don't rush.
>
>>
>>Somebody posted an alleged phone number of BJ's that I found about 3
>>months
>>ago, I don't recall now if I read it here or in the Google archive for
>>RAO.
>>I saved the post and have called that number 3 times. That doesn't mean I
>>have his number, it means I have a number that might belong to him.
>
> Who gives a ****?
>
You, otherwise why are you ranting?
>>
>>I tried to find a number where a live person would answer the phone,
>>because
>>I am not convinced that the Richman that started posting here, is the same
>>as the one who does post here now.
>
> Who gives a ****?
>
Me of course. You seem to care deeply otherwise why the rant?
>>
>>The 2 tries I made got me no hits, when I called At&T 411 on my cel I got
>>nothing.
>>
>>My story hasn't changed, nor have the facts, the interpretation of these
>>facts has taken a few idiots to the hinterlands in their imagination, but
>>they don't match with reality.
>
> Then why has everyone here pointed out your mistake to you? Why don't you
> understand it?
>
The only mistake was mentioning it here. I've done nothing wrong. I wanted
to satisfy my curiosity, so what?
>>>>
>>>>> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
>>>>> situation, I
>>>>> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control.
>>
>>I monitor my blood sugar regularly and I can take my glucophage as
>>directed,
>>I'm not having diabetic moodswings, I'm just tired of being called a liar
>>by
>>people who lie for pleasure, when they aren't just generally being
>>assholes.
>
> Who are these imaginary liars you're talking about?
>
You for one.
>>
>> Unstable blood
>>>>> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>>>>> judgment,
>>>>> and a complete lack of self-awareness.
>>>>
>>
>>Which explains a lot about you.
>>
>>>>Save the excuses for yourself.
>>>
>>> Sounds like you're in denial.
>>>
>>I was about to say that very thing.
>
> Oh, so we're back to IKYABWAIs.

Sometimes very differnt people think alike on some things.

Guess that's the most we'll ever get out of a
> cretin like you, eh, Mikey?
>
If that were true, you would not have your panties in such a bunch.

>>>>
>>>> People are lining up to take shots at
>>>>> you right now because you are such an easy target.
>>>>
>>>>Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do.
>>>>Because
>>>>it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.
>>>
>>> Because you're an idiot.
>>


>>Because I won't admit I'm wrong when I'm not.
>
> Or when you are.
>
But I have in the past. If I can prove to myself I'm wrong about BJ, I'll
admit that as well.
>>
..
>
>>
>>
>> Because you're an
>>> Internet clown, someone to ridicule because you're ridiculous.
>>>
>>>>
>>Bcecause you have nothing better to do than attack people in order to make
>>your own pathetic life seem meaningful.
>
> I get it. The madder you get, the less you are able to express yourself.

You not admitting the truth doesn't make less comprehensible. Most of the
stuff you post is full of rage.

> That's why I suggest that you take a vacation from the group.
>
No thanks.
>>
>>>> Your logic and reasoning
>>>>> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>>>>
>>I see, tell the truth, stick to it and you become an idiot.
>
> You can tell yourself whatever your want. All I'm asking you to do is to
> ask
> your wife to read your posts and tell you what she thinks. If you won't
> believe us, maybe you'll believe her.
>

She doesn't understand why anybody would want to participate in a place
where all people do is attack each other. This place was pretty trashy when
I got here, and will be long after I decide to leave.
>>
>>>>Call me when your develop.
>>>
>>> Develop what?
>>A conscience, integrity, take your pick.
>
> What's your number? I'll call you right now. My conscience and integrity
> have
> always been intact. You're the one who appears to be falling apart before
> our
> eyes.
>
An opinion you get to have. :-)
>>
>> Really, this is the perfect example of how pathetic you are. No
>>> one even knows what you're talking about anymore.
>>>
>>No surprise there.
>
> Good, some progress at last.
>
Again you miss the point.
>>>>
>>>>> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
>>>>> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>>>>
>>>>No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.
>>>
>>> You have no idea about who I am, what I do, or what I'm capable of
>>> doing.
>>> If
>>> you and I met in person, I'm sure you would stop saying this ridiculous
>>> things.
>>>
>>And I should wish to meet a liar and internet geek because of what?
>>So you can attack me in person? Now that I know what you look like you
>>can
>>be sure I'll make sure that if you should seek me out, it would be unwise.
>
> Why? Are you that afraid of me?

I try to stay away from crazy people.

Or are you just afraid of having to be
> accountable for the idiotic things that you say on the Internet?
>
I'm accountable to myself, a much harsher judge than you know.
>>>>
>>>>Merry ****ing Christmas.
>>>
>>> Whatever, Mikey. The best present to give to your family is to get off
>>> RAO.
>>> You're a lost cause.
>>>
Your expert opinion?

>>Better than having personal attacks as your only cause.
>
> I agree. But what does that have to do with anything?
>
Lack of self awareness noted.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>>>>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with
>>>>>>>>>>> Arny.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Now you're hearing things too?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound
>>>>>>stupid
>>>>>>at
>>>>> all."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sound implies hearing, dimwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic grammar
>>>>> error.
>>>>> Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately.
>>>>>
>>>>That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like spelling.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I think you're lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone
>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> lying, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an
>>>>>>obnoxious twit.
>>>>>
>>>>> OSAF.
>>>>>
>>>>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others,
>>>>> do
>>>>> you.
>>>>>
>>>>I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.
>>>
>>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>>
>>No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive
>>move.
>
> So, in your opinion, two wrongs make a right.
>
So in your opinion you're doing wrong.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> link.net...
>>>
>>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>>
>> No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive
>> move.
>>
>
> More Mc Kelvy lies, hypocricy and lack of self awareness.What about the
> rest of us
> defending against Arny's ****, he was slinging
> feces before a lot of us were ever reading RAO.
He was telling the truth about audio and being savaged for it. If you don't
like what he has to say, why not just ignore it. Do you not sink to the
level you think he's at by becoming like him?

[Michael McKelvy]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/26/2004 11:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: . net>
>>
>>
>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>Date: 12/26/2004 12:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>Date: 12/24/2004 11:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>>>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his
>>>>>>> head
>>>>>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>>>>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So you never lie
>>>>
>>>>I haven't done so here. I haven't lied about the process of trying to
>>>>verify BJ's identity.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> or make a mistake.
>>>>
>>>>I make mistakes, probably more than my share.
>>>>
>>>>What a burden it must be to be the only
>>>>> perfect person in the world.
>>>>
>>>>Never claimed to be.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> "When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that."
>>
>>Which is not the same as saying I never do wrong,
>
> Yes it is.
>
> just that I'm not in this
>>case.
>>
>
> Ah, part of your problem is you don't know what words mean. Who knows what
> you
> are actually saying when you tell us you never lie or get things wrong.

I don't lie. I do make mistakes. I do make an effort not to make them,
which is more than I can say for some people here.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> link.net...
>
>>>
>> If you could look into your own soul, I believe you see something you
>> wouldn't be proud of.
>>
>
> "At least" I have a soul.
>
OSAF

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>>>>>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now you're hearing things too?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound
>>>>>>>stupid
>>>>>>>at
>>>>>> all."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sound implies hearing, dimwit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic grammar
>>>>>> error.
>>>>>> Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like spelling.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I think you're lying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone
>>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> lying, too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an
>>>>>>>obnoxious twit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OSAF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others,
>>>>>> do
>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.
>>>>
>>>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>>>
>>>No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive
>>>move.
>>
>> So, in your opinion, two wrongs make a right.
>>
>So in your opinion you're doing wrong.

Not at all. We're going by what YOU say, not by what I say. That is what we
are talking about here. Can you understand that?

Of course not. ****ing moron.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get
>>>>>>>>>> Dr.
>>>>>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me
>>>>>>>>>> $1000,
>>>>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so,
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>> pay
>>>>>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>>>>>>number
>>>>>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your
>>>>>>>flimsy
>>>>>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mean just
>>>>>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied
>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored
>>>>>>>> child
>>>>>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are way too stupid
>>>>>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>>>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of
>>>>>>>> stupidity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Have some more cake.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more
>>>>>>>> meaningful
>>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on
>>>>>>>Lipo
>>>>>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>>>>>>> Internet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put
>>>>>>>out
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a
>>>>>>>NG.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a
>>>>>> place
>>>>>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> illiterate.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think you're properly qualified to recognize a false allegation.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>I am when they are directed at me.
>>
>> Not when you're so delusional that you don't understand them.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
>>>>>> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You,
>>>>>> however,
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught
>>>>>> lying,
>>>>>> tries
>>>>>> a different strategy.
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.
>>>>
>>>> You lied when you said you read Arny's initial post about the child
>>>> pornography
>>>> e-mail, and then went on to maintain that Arny never admitted to storing
>>>> the
>>>> images in his hard drive for three years.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I did read it no matter how many ****ing times yo claim I didn't.
>>
>> Yo? Well, at any rate, your reading comprehension level is invariably in
>> the
>> toilet at this point. You're either illiterate, or a liar. Which is it?
>>
>An imperfect typist.

Nope, it's more than typos. It's poor grammar, it's bad syntax, it's a
frequent use of the wrong word. It's your intellect.

>>>
>>>> You also have lied about contacting Dr. Richman.
>>>>
>>>I haven't contacted him, I phoned a number where nobody answered.
>>
>> And yet I offered to contact him for you. And you declined, because that
>> would
>> shut down your little public spasm, wouldn't it.
>>
>
>I declined because I don't trust you. My method doesn't require me to trust
>anybody, either he can do it or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>>>>>> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.
>>>>
>>>> I've made up my mind, as always, because of the facts. I've proved it
>>>> time and
>>>> time again. And you've always just contradicted what I've said without
>>>> any
>>>> proof of your own. You're a lazy thinker.
>>>>
>>>Nothing I can say will change your mind it's closed.
>>
>> Shouldn't there be a comma in that sentence? You sound like a child.
>>
>You sound like someone who has lost on the facts so now you attack the
>grammar. You migt want to check BJ's posts, he's at least as bad at typos.

Nope, it's more than that. The more angry and desperate you get, the more
typos you make. It gets to the point where people can't understand what you're
saying anymore. It's pretty funny to watch.

>>>
>>>If you 'd go over it, you'd see that I've not done anything I should be
>>>defending my self over.
>>
>> Dude, you're self-destructing. I'm worried that if I keep pushing you,
>> your
>> head will explode.
>
>Looking at you [sic] picture, you seem far closer to that than I.

Well, it's rather idiotic to base your opinion on a four-year-old picture. I
have made an offer to meet you in person, but I see that you would rather
believe in fantasies.

****ing moron.

>
> Now try to construct some sentences correctly. Take your
>> time. Don't rush.
>>
>>>
>>>Somebody posted an alleged phone number of BJ's that I found about 3
>>>months
>>>ago, I don't recall now if I read it here or in the Google archive for
>>>RAO.
>>>I saved the post and have called that number 3 times. That doesn't mean I
>>>have his number, it means I have a number that might belong to him.
>>
>> Who gives a ****?
>>
>You, otherwise why are you ranting?

Because you are stupid to remain here on this NG.

>>>
>>>I tried to find a number where a live person would answer the phone,
>>>because
>>>I am not convinced that the Richman that started posting here, is the same
>>>as the one who does post here now.
>>
>> Who gives a ****?
>>
>Me of course. You seem to care deeply otherwise why the rant?

Because you are too stupid to remain on this NG. You need to go.

>>>
>>>The 2 tries I made got me no hits, when I called At&T 411 on my cel I got
>>>nothing.
>>>
>>>My story hasn't changed, nor have the facts, the interpretation of these
>>>facts has taken a few idiots to the hinterlands in their imagination, but
>>>they don't match with reality.
>>
>> Then why has everyone here pointed out your mistake to you? Why don't you
>> understand it?
>>
>The only mistake was mentioning it here. I've done nothing wrong. I wanted
>to satisfy my curiosity, so what?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
>>>>>> situation, I
>>>>>> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control.
>>>
>>>I monitor my blood sugar regularly and I can take my glucophage as
>>>directed,
>>>I'm not having diabetic moodswings, I'm just tired of being called a liar
>>>by
>>>people who lie for pleasure, when they aren't just generally being
>>>assholes.
>>
>> Who are these imaginary liars you're talking about?
>>
>You for one.

I'm an imaginary liar? Okay, then.

>>>
>>> Unstable blood
>>>>>> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>>>>>> judgment,
>>>>>> and a complete lack of self-awareness.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>Which explains a lot about you.
>>>
>>>>>Save the excuses for yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like you're in denial.
>>>>
>>>I was about to say that very thing.
>>
>> Oh, so we're back to IKYABWAIs.
>
>Sometimes very differnt [sic] people think alike on some things.

Is that supposed to explain your love of using IKYABWAIs? News flash...you use
IKYABWAIs because you lack the wit and intelligence to come up with anything on
your own. You are too dumb to be here. You need to leave. You're insulting
the intelligence of almost everyone here.

>
> Guess that's the most we'll ever get out of a
>> cretin like you, eh, Mikey?
>>
>If that were true, you would not have your panties in such a bunch.

My panties aren't in a bunch. But I would like you to leave, since your
presence here lowers the intellectual standards of the entire group.

>
>>>>>
>>>>> People are lining up to take shots at
>>>>>> you right now because you are such an easy target.
>>>>>
>>>>>Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do.
>>>>>Because
>>>>>it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.
>>>>
>>>> Because you're an idiot.
>>>
>
>
>>>Because I won't admit I'm wrong when I'm not.
>>
>> Or when you are.
>>
>But I have in the past. If I can prove to myself I'm wrong about BJ, I'll
>admit that as well.
>>>
>.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Because you're an
>>>> Internet clown, someone to ridicule because you're ridiculous.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>Bcecause you have nothing better to do than attack people in order to make
>>>your own pathetic life seem meaningful.
>>
>> I get it. The madder you get, the less you are able to express yourself.
>
>You not admitting the truth doesn't make [sic] less comprehensible.

Speaking of less comprehesible...

Most of the
>stuff you post is full of rage.

That would be your poor reading skills letting you down again.

>
>> That's why I suggest that you take a vacation from the group.
>>
>No thanks.

It's your life. Waste it as you will.


>>>
>>>>> Your logic and reasoning
>>>>>> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>>>>>
>>>I see, tell the truth, stick to it and you become an idiot.
>>
>> You can tell yourself whatever your want. All I'm asking you to do is to
>> ask
>> your wife to read your posts and tell you what she thinks. If you won't
>> believe us, maybe you'll believe her.
>>
>
>She doesn't understand why anybody would want to participate in a place
>where all people do is attack each other.

That means YOU, moron.

This place was pretty trashy when
>I got here, and will be long after I decide to leave.

So you feel right at home, in other words.

>>>
>>>>>Call me when your develop.
>>>>
>>>> Develop what?
>>>A conscience, integrity, take your pick.
>>
>> What's your number? I'll call you right now. My conscience and integrity
>> have
>> always been intact. You're the one who appears to be falling apart before
>> our
>> eyes.
>>
>An opinion you get to have. :-)

Which is shared by almost everyone but you. But it's all of us, isn't it.
Everyone but you is crazy.

>>>
>>> Really, this is the perfect example of how pathetic you are. No
>>>> one even knows what you're talking about anymore.
>>>>
>>>No surprise there.
>>
>> Good, some progress at last.
>>
>Again you miss the point.

Again your lack of basic writing skills lets you down again.

>>>>>
>>>>>> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
>>>>>> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>>>>>
>>>>>No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.
>>>>
>>>> You have no idea about who I am, what I do, or what I'm capable of
>>>> doing.
>>>> If
>>>> you and I met in person, I'm sure you would stop saying this ridiculous
>>>> things.
>>>>
>>>And I should wish to meet a liar and internet geek because of what?
>>>So you can attack me in person? Now that I know what you look like you
>>>can
>>>be sure I'll make sure that if you should seek me out, it would be unwise.
>>
>> Why? Are you that afraid of me?
>
>I try to stay away from crazy people.

"Your expert opinion?"

>
> Or are you just afraid of having to be
>> accountable for the idiotic things that you say on the Internet?
>>
>I'm accountable to myself, a much harsher judge than you know.

Yes, it's obvious to everyone here just how masochistic you are. No one in
their right mind would stay here after all of the abuse you've endured.


>>>>>
>>>>>Merry ****ing Christmas.
>>>>
>>>> Whatever, Mikey. The best present to give to your family is to get off
>>>> RAO.
>>>> You're a lost cause.
>>>>
>Your [sic] expert opinion?

Try again.
>
>>>Better than having personal attacks as your only cause.
>>
>> I agree. But what does that have to do with anything?
>>
>Lack of self awareness noted.

Not at all. You just need to do a better job of backing up your attacks with
reality.

Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.

Boon

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will
>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>> Dr.
>>>>>>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay
>>>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>> $1000,
>>>>>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do
>>>>>>>>>>> so,
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> pay
>>>>>>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a
>>>>>>>>>>phone
>>>>>>>>>>number
>>>>>>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall
>>>>>>>>your
>>>>>>>>flimsy
>>>>>>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You mean just
>>>>>>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored
>>>>>>>>> child
>>>>>>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are way too stupid
>>>>>>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>>>>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of
>>>>>>>>> stupidity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Have some more cake.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more
>>>>>>>>> meaningful
>>>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on
>>>>>>>>Lipo
>>>>>>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> Internet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put
>>>>>>>>out
>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on
>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>NG.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a
>>>>>>> moron,
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> illiterate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think you're properly qualified to recognize a false
>>>>> allegation.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>I am when they are directed at me.
>>>
>>> Not when you're so delusional that you don't understand them.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
>>>>>>> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You,
>>>>>>> however,
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught
>>>>>>> lying,
>>>>>>> tries
>>>>>>> a different strategy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.
>>>>>
>>>>> You lied when you said you read Arny's initial post about the child
>>>>> pornography
>>>>> e-mail, and then went on to maintain that Arny never admitted to
>>>>> storing
>>>>> the
>>>>> images in his hard drive for three years.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I did read it no matter how many ****ing times yo claim I didn't.
>>>
>>> Yo? Well, at any rate, your reading comprehension level is invariably
>>> in
>>> the
>>> toilet at this point. You're either illiterate, or a liar. Which is
>>> it?
>>>
>>An imperfect typist.
>
> Nope, it's more than typos. It's poor grammar, it's bad syntax, it's a
> frequent use of the wrong word. It's your intellect.
>
>>>>
>>>>> You also have lied about contacting Dr. Richman.
>>>>>
>>>>I haven't contacted him, I phoned a number where nobody answered.
>>>
>>> And yet I offered to contact him for you. And you declined, because
>>> that
>>> would
>>> shut down your little public spasm, wouldn't it.
>>>
>>
>>I declined because I don't trust you. My method doesn't require me to
>>trust
>>anybody, either he can do it or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>>>>>>> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've made up my mind, as always, because of the facts. I've proved it
>>>>> time and
>>>>> time again. And you've always just contradicted what I've said
>>>>> without
>>>>> any
>>>>> proof of your own. You're a lazy thinker.
>>>>>
>>>>Nothing I can say will change your mind it's closed.
>>>
>>> Shouldn't there be a comma in that sentence? You sound like a child.
>>>
>>You sound like someone who has lost on the facts so now you attack the
>>grammar. You migt want to check BJ's posts, he's at least as bad at
>>typos.
>
> Nope, it's more than that. The more angry and desperate you get, the more
> typos you make. It gets to the point where people can't understand what
> you're
> saying anymore. It's pretty funny to watch.
>
>>>>
>>>>If you 'd go over it, you'd see that I've not done anything I should be
>>>>defending my self over.
>>>
>>> Dude, you're self-destructing. I'm worried that if I keep pushing you,
>>> your
>>> head will explode.
>>
>>Looking at you [sic] picture, you seem far closer to that than I.
>
> Well, it's rather idiotic to base your opinion on a four-year-old picture.
> I
> have made an offer to meet you in person, but I see that you would rather
> believe in fantasies.
>
> ****ing moron.
>
>>
>> Now try to construct some sentences correctly. Take your
>>> time. Don't rush.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Somebody posted an alleged phone number of BJ's that I found about 3
>>>>months
>>>>ago, I don't recall now if I read it here or in the Google archive for
>>>>RAO.
>>>>I saved the post and have called that number 3 times. That doesn't mean
>>>>I
>>>>have his number, it means I have a number that might belong to him.
>>>
>>> Who gives a ****?
>>>
>>You, otherwise why are you ranting?
>
> Because you are stupid to remain here on this NG.
>
>>>>
>>>>I tried to find a number where a live person would answer the phone,
>>>>because
>>>>I am not convinced that the Richman that started posting here, is the
>>>>same
>>>>as the one who does post here now.
>>>
>>> Who gives a ****?
>>>
>>Me of course. You seem to care deeply otherwise why the rant?
>
> Because you are too stupid to remain on this NG. You need to go.
>
>>>>
>>>>The 2 tries I made got me no hits, when I called At&T 411 on my cel I
>>>>got
>>>>nothing.
>>>>
>>>>My story hasn't changed, nor have the facts, the interpretation of these
>>>>facts has taken a few idiots to the hinterlands in their imagination,
>>>>but
>>>>they don't match with reality.
>>>
>>> Then why has everyone here pointed out your mistake to you? Why don't
>>> you
>>> understand it?
>>>
>>The only mistake was mentioning it here. I've done nothing wrong. I
>>wanted
>>to satisfy my curiosity, so what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
>>>>>>> situation, I
>>>>>>> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control.
>>>>
>>>>I monitor my blood sugar regularly and I can take my glucophage as
>>>>directed,
>>>>I'm not having diabetic moodswings, I'm just tired of being called a
>>>>liar
>>>>by
>>>>people who lie for pleasure, when they aren't just generally being
>>>>assholes.
>>>
>>> Who are these imaginary liars you're talking about?
>>>
>>You for one.
>
> I'm an imaginary liar? Okay, then.
>
>>>>
>>>> Unstable blood
>>>>>>> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>>>>>>> judgment,
>>>>>>> and a complete lack of self-awareness.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Which explains a lot about you.
>>>>
>>>>>>Save the excuses for yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like you're in denial.
>>>>>
>>>>I was about to say that very thing.
>>>
>>> Oh, so we're back to IKYABWAIs.
>>
>>Sometimes very differnt [sic] people think alike on some things.
>
> Is that supposed to explain your love of using IKYABWAIs? News
> flash...you use
> IKYABWAIs because you lack the wit and intelligence to come up with
> anything on
> your own. You are too dumb to be here. You need to leave. You're
> insulting
> the intelligence of almost everyone here.
>
>>
>> Guess that's the most we'll ever get out of a
>>> cretin like you, eh, Mikey?
>>>
>>If that were true, you would not have your panties in such a bunch.
>
> My panties aren't in a bunch. But I would like you to leave, since your
> presence here lowers the intellectual standards of the entire group.
>
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> People are lining up to take shots at
>>>>>>> you right now because you are such an easy target.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do.
>>>>>>Because
>>>>>>it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you're an idiot.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>Because I won't admit I'm wrong when I'm not.
>>>
>>> Or when you are.
>>>
>>But I have in the past. If I can prove to myself I'm wrong about BJ, I'll
>>admit that as well.
>>>>
>>.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because you're an
>>>>> Internet clown, someone to ridicule because you're ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>Bcecause you have nothing better to do than attack people in order to
>>>>make
>>>>your own pathetic life seem meaningful.
>>>
>>> I get it. The madder you get, the less you are able to express
>>> yourself.
>>
>>You not admitting the truth doesn't make [sic] less comprehensible.
>
> Speaking of less comprehesible...
>
> Most of the
>>stuff you post is full of rage.
>
> That would be your poor reading skills letting you down again.
>
>>
>>> That's why I suggest that you take a vacation from the group.
>>>
>>No thanks.
>
> It's your life. Waste it as you will.
>
>
>>>>
>>>>>> Your logic and reasoning
>>>>>>> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>I see, tell the truth, stick to it and you become an idiot.
>>>
>>> You can tell yourself whatever your want. All I'm asking you to do is
>>> to
>>> ask
>>> your wife to read your posts and tell you what she thinks. If you won't
>>> believe us, maybe you'll believe her.
>>>
>>
>>She doesn't understand why anybody would want to participate in a place
>>where all people do is attack each other.
>
> That means YOU, moron.
>
> This place was pretty trashy when
>>I got here, and will be long after I decide to leave.
>
> So you feel right at home, in other words.
>
>>>>
>>>>>>Call me when your develop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Develop what?
>>>>A conscience, integrity, take your pick.
>>>
>>> What's your number? I'll call you right now. My conscience and
>>> integrity
>>> have
>>> always been intact. You're the one who appears to be falling apart
>>> before
>>> our
>>> eyes.
>>>
>>An opinion you get to have. :-)
>
> Which is shared by almost everyone but you. But it's all of us, isn't it.
> Everyone but you is crazy.
>
>>>>
>>>> Really, this is the perfect example of how pathetic you are. No
>>>>> one even knows what you're talking about anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>No surprise there.
>>>
>>> Good, some progress at last.
>>>
>>Again you miss the point.
>
> Again your lack of basic writing skills lets you down again.
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have no idea about who I am, what I do, or what I'm capable of
>>>>> doing.
>>>>> If
>>>>> you and I met in person, I'm sure you would stop saying this
>>>>> ridiculous
>>>>> things.
>>>>>
>>>>And I should wish to meet a liar and internet geek because of what?
>>>>So you can attack me in person? Now that I know what you look like you
>>>>can
>>>>be sure I'll make sure that if you should seek me out, it would be
>>>>unwise.
>>>
>>> Why? Are you that afraid of me?
>>
>>I try to stay away from crazy people.
>
> "Your expert opinion?"
>
>>
>> Or are you just afraid of having to be
>>> accountable for the idiotic things that you say on the Internet?
>>>
>>I'm accountable to myself, a much harsher judge than you know.
>
> Yes, it's obvious to everyone here just how masochistic you are. No one
> in
> their right mind would stay here after all of the abuse you've endured.
>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Merry ****ing Christmas.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever, Mikey. The best present to give to your family is to get
>>>>> off
>>>>> RAO.
>>>>> You're a lost cause.
>>>>>
>>Your [sic] expert opinion?
>
> Try again.
>>
>>>>Better than having personal attacks as your only cause.
>>>
>>> I agree. But what does that have to do with anything?
>>>
>>Lack of self awareness noted.
>
> Not at all.

Exactly, not at all.

You just need to do a better job of backing up your attacks with
> reality.
>
> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>
Leave the table, you're to fat to be there.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Now you're hearing things too?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound
>>>>>>>>stupid
>>>>>>>>at
>>>>>>> all."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Sound implies hearing, dimwit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic grammar
>>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>> Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like
>>>>>>spelling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I think you're lying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that
>>>>>>>>> everyone
>>>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> lying, too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an
>>>>>>>>obnoxious twit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OSAF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others,
>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>>>>
>>>>No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive
>>>>move.
>>>
>>> So, in your opinion, two wrongs make a right.
>>>
>>So in your opinion you're doing wrong.
>
> Not at all. We're going by what YOU say, not by what I say. That is what
> we
> are talking about here.

We? Seems like it's mostly you. I don't know where you find the time
between meals.

Can you understand that?
>
> Of course not. ****ing moron.
>
Can you understand that absolutely nothing you have to say has any
importance to me? I didn't think so, you're too obsessed with trying to
seem like you are important.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
hlink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> link.net...
>>>>
>>>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>>>
>>> No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive
>>> move.
>>>
>>
>> More Mc Kelvy lies, hypocricy and lack of self awareness.What about the
>> rest of us
>> defending against Arny's ****, he was slinging
>> feces before a lot of us were ever reading RAO.
> He was telling the truth about audio and being savaged for it. If you
> don't like what he has to say, why not just ignore it. Do you not sink to
> the level you think he's at by becoming like him?
>

Why do you blame us for reacting against the instigator.
In, by your own admissions, that is what you claim that you are doing.
But when you do it, it is noble, 'but when we do the same thing,
you judge us to be at fault. That is your hypocrisy, and you refuse
to see it and refuse to admit it.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> link.net...
>>
>>>>
>>> If you could look into your own soul, I believe you see something you
>>> wouldn't be proud of.
>>>
>>
>> "At least" I have a soul.
>>
> OSAF
>

Your OSAF is OSAF, and your OSAF's
OSAF is OSAF, and your grandOSAF's, on both your mothe
and fathers' sidess are OSAF. Your OSAF wears combat boots.
Try saying something intelligent for once.

[Clyde Slick]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will
>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>> Dr.
>>>>>>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay
>>>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>> $1000,
>>>>>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do
>>>>>>>>>>> so,
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> pay
>>>>>>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a
>>>>>>>>>>phone
>>>>>>>>>>number
>>>>>>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall
>>>>>>>>your
>>>>>>>>flimsy
>>>>>>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You mean just
>>>>>>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored
>>>>>>>>> child
>>>>>>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are way too stupid
>>>>>>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>>>>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of
>>>>>>>>> stupidity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Have some more cake.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more
>>>>>>>>> meaningful
>>>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on
>>>>>>>>Lipo
>>>>>>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> Internet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put
>>>>>>>>out
>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on
>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>NG.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a
>>>>>>> moron,
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> illiterate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think you're properly qualified to recognize a false
>>>>> allegation.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>I am when they are directed at me.
>>>
>>> Not when you're so delusional that you don't understand them.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
>>>>>>> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You,
>>>>>>> however,
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught
>>>>>>> lying,
>>>>>>> tries
>>>>>>> a different strategy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.
>>>>>
>>>>> You lied when you said you read Arny's initial post about the child
>>>>> pornography
>>>>> e-mail, and then went on to maintain that Arny never admitted to
>>>>> storing
>>>>> the
>>>>> images in his hard drive for three years.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I did read it no matter how many ****ing times yo claim I didn't.
>>>
>>> Yo? Well, at any rate, your reading comprehension level is invariably
>>> in
>>> the
>>> toilet at this point. You're either illiterate, or a liar. Which is
>>> it?
>>>
>>An imperfect typist.
>
> Nope, it's more than typos. It's poor grammar, it's bad syntax, it's a
> frequent use of the wrong word. It's your intellect.
>
>>>>
>>>>> You also have lied about contacting Dr. Richman.
>>>>>
>>>>I haven't contacted him, I phoned a number where nobody answered.
>>>
>>> And yet I offered to contact him for you. And you declined, because
>>> that
>>> would
>>> shut down your little public spasm, wouldn't it.
>>>
>>
>>I declined because I don't trust you. My method doesn't require me to
>>trust
>>anybody, either he can do it or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>>>>>>> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've made up my mind, as always, because of the facts. I've proved it
>>>>> time and
>>>>> time again. And you've always just contradicted what I've said
>>>>> without
>>>>> any
>>>>> proof of your own. You're a lazy thinker.
>>>>>
>>>>Nothing I can say will change your mind it's closed.
>>>
>>> Shouldn't there be a comma in that sentence? You sound like a child.
>>>
>>You sound like someone who has lost on the facts so now you attack the
>>grammar. You migt want to check BJ's posts, he's at least as bad at
>>typos.
>
> Nope, it's more than that. The more angry and desperate you get, the more
> typos you make. It gets to the point where people can't understand what
> you're
> saying anymore. It's pretty funny to watch.
>
>>>>
>>>>If you 'd go over it, you'd see that I've not done anything I should be
>>>>defending my self over.
>>>
>>> Dude, you're self-destructing. I'm worried that if I keep pushing you,
>>> your
>>> head will explode.
>>
>>Looking at you [sic] picture, you seem far closer to that than I.
>
> Well, it's rather idiotic to base your opinion on a four-year-old picture.
> I
> have made an offer to meet you in person, but I see that you would rather
> believe in fantasies.
>
> ****ing moron.
>
>>
>> Now try to construct some sentences correctly. Take your
>>> time. Don't rush.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Somebody posted an alleged phone number of BJ's that I found about 3
>>>>months
>>>>ago, I don't recall now if I read it here or in the Google archive for
>>>>RAO.
>>>>I saved the post and have called that number 3 times. That doesn't mean
>>>>I
>>>>have his number, it means I have a number that might belong to him.
>>>
>>> Who gives a ****?
>>>
>>You, otherwise why are you ranting?
>
> Because you are stupid to remain here on this NG.
>
>>>>
>>>>I tried to find a number where a live person would answer the phone,
>>>>because
>>>>I am not convinced that the Richman that started posting here, is the
>>>>same
>>>>as the one who does post here now.
>>>
>>> Who gives a ****?
>>>
>>Me of course. You seem to care deeply otherwise why the rant?
>
> Because you are too stupid to remain on this NG. You need to go.
>
>>>>
>>>>The 2 tries I made got me no hits, when I called At&T 411 on my cel I
>>>>got
>>>>nothing.
>>>>
>>>>My story hasn't changed, nor have the facts, the interpretation of these
>>>>facts has taken a few idiots to the hinterlands in their imagination,
>>>>but
>>>>they don't match with reality.
>>>
>>> Then why has everyone here pointed out your mistake to you? Why don't
>>> you
>>> understand it?
>>>
>>The only mistake was mentioning it here. I've done nothing wrong. I
>>wanted
>>to satisfy my curiosity, so what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
>>>>>>> situation, I
>>>>>>> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control.
>>>>
>>>>I monitor my blood sugar regularly and I can take my glucophage as
>>>>directed,
>>>>I'm not having diabetic moodswings, I'm just tired of being called a
>>>>liar
>>>>by
>>>>people who lie for pleasure, when they aren't just generally being
>>>>assholes.
>>>
>>> Who are these imaginary liars you're talking about?
>>>
>>You for one.
>
> I'm an imaginary liar? Okay, then.
>
>>>>
>>>> Unstable blood
>>>>>>> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>>>>>>> judgment,
>>>>>>> and a complete lack of self-awareness.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Which explains a lot about you.
>>>>
>>>>>>Save the excuses for yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like you're in denial.
>>>>>
>>>>I was about to say that very thing.
>>>
>>> Oh, so we're back to IKYABWAIs.
>>
>>Sometimes very differnt [sic] people think alike on some things.
>
> Is that supposed to explain your love of using IKYABWAIs? News
> flash...you use
> IKYABWAIs because you lack the wit and intelligence to come up with
> anything on
> your own. You are too dumb to be here. You need to leave. You're
> insulting
> the intelligence of almost everyone here.
>
>>
>> Guess that's the most we'll ever get out of a
>>> cretin like you, eh, Mikey?
>>>
>>If that were true, you would not have your panties in such a bunch.
>
> My panties aren't in a bunch. But I would like you to leave, since your
> presence here lowers the intellectual standards of the entire group.
>
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> People are lining up to take shots at
>>>>>>> you right now because you are such an easy target.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do.
>>>>>>Because
>>>>>>it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you're an idiot.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>Because I won't admit I'm wrong when I'm not.
>>>
>>> Or when you are.
>>>
>>But I have in the past. If I can prove to myself I'm wrong about BJ, I'll
>>admit that as well.
>>>>
>>.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because you're an
>>>>> Internet clown, someone to ridicule because you're ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>Bcecause you have nothing better to do than attack people in order to
>>>>make
>>>>your own pathetic life seem meaningful.
>>>
>>> I get it. The madder you get, the less you are able to express
>>> yourself.
>>
>>You not admitting the truth doesn't make [sic] less comprehensible.
>
> Speaking of less comprehesible...
>
> Most of the
>>stuff you post is full of rage.
>
> That would be your poor reading skills letting you down again.
>
>>
>>> That's why I suggest that you take a vacation from the group.
>>>
>>No thanks.
>
> It's your life. Waste it as you will.
>
>
>>>>
>>>>>> Your logic and reasoning
>>>>>>> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>I see, tell the truth, stick to it and you become an idiot.
>>>
>>> You can tell yourself whatever your want. All I'm asking you to do is
>>> to
>>> ask
>>> your wife to read your posts and tell you what she thinks. If you won't
>>> believe us, maybe you'll believe her.
>>>
>>
>>She doesn't understand why anybody would want to participate in a place
>>where all people do is attack each other.
>
> That means YOU, moron.
>
> This place was pretty trashy when
>>I got here, and will be long after I decide to leave.
>
> So you feel right at home, in other words.
>
>>>>
>>>>>>Call me when your develop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Develop what?
>>>>A conscience, integrity, take your pick.
>>>
>>> What's your number? I'll call you right now. My conscience and
>>> integrity
>>> have
>>> always been intact. You're the one who appears to be falling apart
>>> before
>>> our
>>> eyes.
>>>
>>An opinion you get to have. :-)
>
> Which is shared by almost everyone but you. But it's all of us, isn't it.
> Everyone but you is crazy.
>
>>>>
>>>> Really, this is the perfect example of how pathetic you are. No
>>>>> one even knows what you're talking about anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>No surprise there.
>>>
>>> Good, some progress at last.
>>>
>>Again you miss the point.
>
> Again your lack of basic writing skills lets you down again.
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have no idea about who I am, what I do, or what I'm capable of
>>>>> doing.
>>>>> If
>>>>> you and I met in person, I'm sure you would stop saying this
>>>>> ridiculous
>>>>> things.
>>>>>
>>>>And I should wish to meet a liar and internet geek because of what?
>>>>So you can attack me in person? Now that I know what you look like you
>>>>can
>>>>be sure I'll make sure that if you should seek me out, it would be
>>>>unwise.
>>>
>>> Why? Are you that afraid of me?
>>
>>I try to stay away from crazy people.
>
> "Your expert opinion?"
>
>>
>> Or are you just afraid of having to be
>>> accountable for the idiotic things that you say on the Internet?
>>>
>>I'm accountable to myself, a much harsher judge than you know.
>
> Yes, it's obvious to everyone here just how masochistic you are. No one
> in
> their right mind would stay here after all of the abuse you've endured.
>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Merry ****ing Christmas.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever, Mikey. The best present to give to your family is to get
>>>>> off
>>>>> RAO.
>>>>> You're a lost cause.
>>>>>
>>Your [sic] expert opinion?
>
> Try again.
>>
>>>>Better than having personal attacks as your only cause.
>>>
>>> I agree. But what does that have to do with anything?
>>>
>>Lack of self awareness noted.
>
> Not at all. You just need to do a better job of backing up your attacks
> with
> reality.
>
> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>
> Boon
>

[Clyde Slick]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>>
>>Lack of self awareness noted.
>
> Not at all. You just need to do a better job of backing up your attacks
> with
> reality.
>
> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>

I don't know about that. We allow Zakhann and Lionel to post here.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>
>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.

Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

Clyde Slick said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>>
>>>Lack of self awareness noted.
>>
>> Not at all. You just need to do a better job of backing up your attacks
>> with
>> reality.
>>
>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>
>
>I don't know about that. We allow Zakhann and Lionel to post here.

Well, I don't know if Lionel's actually that stupid. He's just stubborn enough
to think that his poor English doesn't prevent him from looking that stupid.
As for Zakhann, well, he makes one stupid comment every six months and then
runs away when he's outwitted. Not exactly a real threat there.

Boon

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>
>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>
> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.
>
Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> hlink.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> link.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>>>>
>>>> No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a
>>>> defensive move.
>>>>
>>>
>>> More Mc Kelvy lies, hypocricy and lack of self awareness.What about the
>>> rest of us
>>> defending against Arny's ****, he was slinging
>>> feces before a lot of us were ever reading RAO.
>> He was telling the truth about audio and being savaged for it. If you
>> don't like what he has to say, why not just ignore it. Do you not sink
>> to the level you think he's at by becoming like him?
>>
>
> Why do you blame us for reacting against the instigator.
Because it solves nothing.

> In, by your own admissions, that is what you claim that you are doing.
Do you like it?

> But when you do it, it is noble, 'but when we do the same thing,
> you judge us to be at fault.

You are the ones who keep complaining about it from him, yet you don't see
anything wrong with the same behavior.

That is your hypocrisy, and you refuse
> to see it and refuse to admit it.
I admit what I do is just as bad, why won't you?

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> link.net...
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> If you could look into your own soul, I believe you see something you
>>>> wouldn't be proud of.
>>>>
>>>
>>> "At least" I have a soul.
>>>
>> OSAF
>>
>
> Your OSAF is OSAF, and your OSAF's
> OSAF is OSAF, and your grandOSAF's, on both your mothe
> and fathers' sidess are OSAF. Your OSAF wears combat boots.
> Try saying something intelligent for once.
>
Try following your own advice.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>
>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>
>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.
>>
>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.

Really? That's it? What a ****ing wimp you are. Leave the NG. You're too
stupid.
Oh wait. Let me rephrase it so that you can understand: Your to stupid.

Boon

[Bruce J. Richman]

Mr. Phillips wrote:


>McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clyde Slick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only reasons that you aren't riding with him is that you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So slut, you approve of Duh Mikey's internet stalking.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And of course, you know that we caught him in an absolute
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie about Dr R.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>You "know" no such thing. You believe it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll tell you what, Mikey. I'll make a bet with you. I will get
>>>>>>>>>>> Dr.
>>>>>>>>>>> Richman's
>>>>>>>>>>> phone number and address. I will visit his office. I will take
>>>>>>>>>>> pictures
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> everything to prove his existence. IF I do that, you will pay me
>>>>>>>>>>> $1000,
>>>>>>>>>>> plus
>>>>>>>>>>> all of my expenses to travel to Florida. If I am unable to do so,
>
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>> pay
>>>>>>>>>>> YOU $1000.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Will that shut you up for good?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Why in the **** would I trust you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>My proposal stands, when Bruce can post the last 4 digits of a phone
>>>>>>>>>>number
>>>>>>>>>>I call him from, I will shut up about him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you're passing up my offer of solid, indisputable evidence?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nothing from you is solid, starting with your fat gut. I recall your
>>>>>>>>flimsy
>>>>>>>>grounds for declaring Arny is a pedophile.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You mean just
>>>>>>>>> like I did when I offered proof of Arny's pedophilia, and you lied
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>> read it when you said that Arny never admitted to having stored
>>>>>>>>> child
>>>>>>>>> pornography on his hard drive?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Except that I did read it lard ass, and it was proof of nothing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll make it easy for you. GET THE **** OFF THIS NG.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>OOoooh, I'm trembling.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are way too stupid
>>>>>>>>> to be here, wasting everyone's time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And you are a waste of good air.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your status as an utter moron was
>>>>>>>>> established years ago, and every day you plumb new depths of
>>>>>>>>> stupidity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Have some more cake.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>>> need to walk away, chalk it up to experience, and lead a more
>>>>>>>>> meaningful
>>>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>> away from RAO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You need to get off your ass and take that $1000.00 and spend it on
>>>>>>>>Lipo
>>>>>>>>suction or join a gym.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It disturbs me that there are people as stupid as you polluting the
>>>>>>>>> Internet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It disturbs me that people as vile and nasty as you haven't been put
>>>>>>>>out
>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>your misery. You obviously have no life other than being a **** on a
>>>>>>>>NG.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Go away. Don't come back.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Let me think about it for a minute.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hmmmmm. NO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just don't understand why you would want to spend so much time at a
>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>> where people regularly humilate you and expose you as a liar, a moron,
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> illiterate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't understand why people want to make false allegations.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think you're properly qualified to recognize a false allegation.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>I am when they are directed at me.
>>>
>>> Not when you're so delusional that you don't understand them.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> I know I've said this before with regards to Arny and Howard, but
>>>>>>> with them it's more about being an asshole and trolling. You,
>>>>>>> however,
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> devolved into something totally different. Even Arny, when caught
>>>>>>> lying,
>>>>>>> tries
>>>>>>> a different strategy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe that's the difference, I haven't lied.
>>>>>
>>>>> You lied when you said you read Arny's initial post about the child
>>>>> pornography
>>>>> e-mail, and then went on to maintain that Arny never admitted to storing
>>>>> the
>>>>> images in his hard drive for three years.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I did read it no matter how many ****ing times yo claim I didn't.
>>>
>>> Yo? Well, at any rate, your reading comprehension level is invariably in
>>> the
>>> toilet at this point. You're either illiterate, or a liar. Which is it?
>>>
>>An imperfect typist.
>
>Nope, it's more than typos. It's poor grammar, it's bad syntax, it's a
>frequent use of the wrong word. It's your intellect.
>
>>>>
>>>>> You also have lied about contacting Dr. Richman.
>>>>>
>>>>I haven't contacted him, I phoned a number where nobody answered.
>>>
>>> And yet I offered to contact him for you. And you declined, because that
>>> would
>>> shut down your little public spasm, wouldn't it.
>>>
>>
>>I declined because I don't trust you. My method doesn't require me to trust
>
>>anybody, either he can do it or not.
>>>>>>

The above pathetically tansparent lie is just more McKelvy bull****. I've
*can* answer telephone calls and do frolm legitimate calleers, as many on RAO
already know. However, after being targeted for over 7 years of lies and
libelous false claims by a sociopathic cretin, McKelvy, I would be as stupid
as he is (and nobody is *that* stupid) to believe one word he says about
anything having to do with me. We both know this, and that's the only reason
he tried a new smear campaign tactic by making a phony proposal. As Paul
Dormer was kind enough to repost in an incident several years ago, this issue
was conclusively laid to rest. McKelvy's lies have been refuted over and over
again to the satisfaction of everybody except McKelvy and Krueger - who
routinely support and encourage each others' lies.



>>>>>> You however, stand there and repeat the same lies over
>>>>>>> and over even though they've been completely exposed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>More bull****. You've made up your mind despite the facts.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've made up my mind, as always, because of the facts. I've proved it
>>>>> time and
>>>>> time again. And you've always just contradicted what I've said without
>>>>> any
>>>>> proof of your own. You're a lazy thinker.
>>>>>
>>>>Nothing I can say will change your mind it's closed.
>>>
>>> Shouldn't there be a comma in that sentence? You sound like a child.
>>>
>>You sound like someone who has lost on the facts so now you attack the
>>grammar. You migt want to check BJ's posts, he's at least as bad at typos.
>
>Nope, it's more than that. The more angry and desperate you get, the more
>typos you make. It gets to the point where people can't understand what
>you're
>saying anymore. It's pretty funny to watch.
>

Unlike the delusional McKelvy who keeps trying to change the topic by
predictably smearing me, I simply choose most of the time not check my spelling
before posting. AOL does not provide a spell-checker, and frankly, I don't
feel a need to compose NG posts on a word processor and than tansfer them to
AOL before posting.

McKelvy, OTOH, shows evidence, as Mr. Phillips suggested, of becoming more nad
more cognitively impaired as his rage and snxiety increases. Consequently, he
becomes, like many hysterical liars that realize they've been caught and
exposed, more and more incoherent.


>>>>
>>>>If you 'd go over it, you'd see that I've not done anything I should be
>>>>defending my self over.
>>>
>>> Dude, you're self-destructing. I'm worried that if I keep pushing you,
>>> your
>>> head will explode.
>>
>>Looking at you [sic] picture, you seem far closer to that than I.
>
>Well, it's rather idiotic to base your opinion on a four-year-old picture. I
>have made an offer to meet you in person, but I see that you would rather
>believe in fantasies.
>
>****ing moron.
>
>>
>> Now try to construct some sentences correctly. Take your
>>> time. Don't rush.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Somebody posted an alleged phone number of BJ's that I found about 3
>>>>months
>>>>ago, I don't recall now if I read it here or in the Google archive for
>>>>RAO.
>>>>I saved the post and have called that number 3 times. That doesn't mean I
>>>>have his number, it means I have a number that might belong to him.
>>>
>>> Who gives a ****?
>>>
>>You, otherwise why are you ranting?
>
>Because you are stupid to remain here on this NG.
>
>>>>
>>>>I tried to find a number where a live person would answer the phone,
>>>>because
>>>>I am not convinced that the Richman that started posting here, is the same
>>>>as the one who does post here now.
>>>
>>> Who gives a ****?
>>>
>>Me of course. You seem to care deeply otherwise why the rant?
>
>Because you are too stupid to remain on this NG. You need to go.
>
>>>>
>>>>The 2 tries I made got me no hits, when I called At&T 411 on my cel I got
>>>>nothing.
>>>>
>>>>My story hasn't changed, nor have the facts, the interpretation of these
>>>>facts has taken a few idiots to the hinterlands in their imagination, but
>>>>they don't match with reality.
>>>
>>> Then why has everyone here pointed out your mistake to you? Why don't you
>>> understand it?
>>>
>>The only mistake was mentioning it here. I've done nothing wrong. I wanted
>
>>to satisfy my curiosity, so what?

This is another lie, of course. McKelvy has no curiosity, nnd hasn't had any
curiosity for over 7 years - during which time he's been generating numerous
false claims and libelous statements about me. Does he reallly think that
anybody believes he suddently got curious after 7 years?

ROFLMAO !!!!!!


>>>>>>> Again, as a fellow diabetic with some degree of empathy for your
>>>>>>> situation, I
>>>>>>> have to think that your diabetes is raging out of control.
>>>>
>>>>I monitor my blood sugar regularly and I can take my glucophage as
>>>>directed,
>>>>I'm not having diabetic moodswings, I'm just tired of being called a liar
>>>>by
>>>>people who lie for pleasure, when they aren't just generally being
>>>>assholes.
>>>
>>> Who are these imaginary liars you're talking about?
>>>
>>You for one.
>
>I'm an imaginary liar? Okay, then.
>

Marc, it appears that McKelvy has somehow, without consciously trying, made a
terrible mistake. He unwittingly told the truth about something !!!!! He
admitted that you're an "imaginary liar". In fact, we are *all* "imaginary
liars". :)

That would be in contrast to McKelvy, who has proven over and over again, that
he is a "real, compulsive liar" with a lengthy history of proven lies to his
"credit".

>>>>
>>>> Unstable blood
>>>>>>> sugar levels result in severe mood swings, irrational behavior, poor
>>>>>>> judgment,
>>>>>>> and a complete lack of self-awareness.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Which explains a lot about you.
>>>>
>>>>>>Save the excuses for yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like you're in denial.
>>>>>
>>>>I was about to say that very thing.
>>>
>>> Oh, so we're back to IKYABWAIs.
>>
>>Sometimes very differnt [sic] people think alike on some things.
>
>Is that supposed to explain your love of using IKYABWAIs? News flash...you
>use
>IKYABWAIs because you lack the wit and intelligence to come up with anything
>on
>your own. You are too dumb to be here. You need to leave. You're insulting
>the intelligence of almost everyone here.
>
>>
>> Guess that's the most we'll ever get out of a
>>> cretin like you, eh, Mikey?
>>>
>>If that were true, you would not have your panties in such a bunch.
>
>My panties aren't in a bunch. But I would like you to leave, since your
>presence here lowers the intellectual standards of the entire group.
>
>>

It also lowers the honesty and self-awareness standards of the whole group.


>>>>>>
>>>>>> People are lining up to take shots at
>>>>>>> you right now because you are such an easy target.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Because I won't back down. Because they have nothing better to do.
>>>>>>Because
>>>>>>it's all they ever do, if not me then somebody else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you're an idiot.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>Because I won't admit I'm wrong when I'm not.
>>>
>>> Or when you are.
>>>
>>But I have in the past. If I can prove to myself I'm wrong about BJ, I'll
>>admit that as well.
>>>>
>>.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because you're an
>>>>> Internet clown, someone to ridicule because you're ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>Bcecause you have nothing better to do than attack people in order to make
>>>>your own pathetic life seem meaningful.
>>>
>>> I get it. The madder you get, the less you are able to express yourself.
>>
>>You not admitting the truth doesn't make [sic] less comprehensible.
>
>Speaking of less comprehesible...
>
> Most of the
>>stuff you post is full of rage.
>
>That would be your poor reading skills letting you down again.
>
>>
>>> That's why I suggest that you take a vacation from the group.
>>>
>>No thanks.
>
>It's your life. Waste it as you will.
>
>
>>>>
>>>>>> Your logic and reasoning
>>>>>>> skills are almost totally non-existent at this point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>I see, tell the truth, stick to it and you become an idiot.
>>>
>>> You can tell yourself whatever your want. All I'm asking you to do is to
>>> ask
>>> your wife to read your posts and tell you what she thinks. If you won't
>>> believe us, maybe you'll believe her.
>>>
>>
>>She doesn't understand why anybody would want to participate in a place
>>where all people do is attack each other.
>
>That means YOU, moron.
>
> This place was pretty trashy when
>>I got here, and will be long after I decide to leave.
>
>So you feel right at home, in other words.
>
>>>>
>>>>>>Call me when your develop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Develop what?
>>>>A conscience, integrity, take your pick.
>>>
>>> What's your number? I'll call you right now. My conscience and integrity
>
>>> have
>>> always been intact. You're the one who appears to be falling apart before
>
>>> our
>>> eyes.
>>>
>>An opinion you get to have. :-)
>
>Which is shared by almost everyone but you. But it's all of us, isn't it.
>Everyone but you is crazy.
>

All the "imaginary liars" except him.


>>>>
>>>> Really, this is the perfect example of how pathetic you are. No
>>>>> one even knows what you're talking about anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>No surprise there.
>>>
>>> Good, some progress at last.
>>>
>>Again you miss the point.
>
>Again your lack of basic writing skills lets you down again.
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know you probably think I'm bull****ting you right now, McKelvy, but
>>>>>>> honestly, no one can be this stupid without some medical reason.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>No one can be as fat as you without being a lazy sack of ****.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have no idea about who I am, what I do, or what I'm capable of
>>>>> doing.
>>>>> If
>>>>> you and I met in person, I'm sure you would stop saying this ridiculous
>>>>> things.
>>>>>
>>>>And I should wish to meet a liar and internet geek because of what?
>>>>So you can attack me in person? Now that I know what you look like you
>>>>can
>>>>be sure I'll make sure that if you should seek me out, it would be unwise.
>>>
>>> Why? Are you that afraid of me?
>>
>>I try to stay away from crazy people.
>
>"Your expert opinion?"
>
>>
>> Or are you just afraid of having to be
>>> accountable for the idiotic things that you say on the Internet?
>>>
>>I'm accountable to myself, a much harsher judge than you know.
>
>Yes, it's obvious to everyone here just how masochistic you are. No one in
>their right mind would stay here after all of the abuse you've endured.
>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Merry ****ing Christmas.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever, Mikey. The best present to give to your family is to get off
>>>>> RAO.
>>>>> You're a lost cause.
>>>>>
>>Your [sic] expert opinion?
>
>Try again.
>>
>>>>Better than having personal attacks as your only cause.
>>>
>>> I agree. But what does that have to do with anything?
>>>
>>Lack of self awareness noted.
>
>Not at all. You just need to do a better job of backing up your attacks with
>reality.
>

That will, unfortunately, never happen. He's in denial, as evidenced by his
dslusional cliam that he doesn't lie.

>Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>
>Boon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Bruce J. Richman

[S888Wheel]

>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: . net>
>
>
>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>
>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>
>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.
>>
>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>
>


He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
is really pathetic.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...

> I admit what I do is just as bad, why won't you?
>

Because I haven't falsley accused you of sending
me kiddie pron pictures.

[Michael McKelvy]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: . net>
>>
>>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>
>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>
>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.
>>>
>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>
>>
>
>
> He's not particularly fat.

I saw the picture, he's pretty fat.

But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
> be? Pretty ****ed up.

No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I wouldn't be
talking about how fat his is.

And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
> is really pathetic.

I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people I
wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you can say
on a public forum.

I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
understand the meaning.

Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can communicate.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>
>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>
>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.
>>>
>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>
> Really? That's it? What a ****ing wimp you are. Leave the NG. You're
> too
> stupid.
> Oh wait. Let me rephrase it so that you can understand: Your to stupid.
>
I like it here, in spite of ****heads like you, so I won't be going
anywhere.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Now you're hearing things too?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound
>>>>>>>>>>stupid
>>>>>>>>>>at
>>>>>>>>> all."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Sound implies hearing, dimwit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic
>>>>>>>>> grammar
>>>>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>>>> Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like
>>>>>>>>spelling.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>I think you're lying.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that
>>>>>>>>>>> everyone
>>>>>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> lying, too.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are
>>>>>>>>>>an
>>>>>>>>>>obnoxious twit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> OSAF.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for
>>>>>>>>> others,
>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a
>>>>>>defensive
>>>>>>move.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in your opinion, two wrongs make a right.
>>>>>
>>>>So in your opinion you're doing wrong.
>>>
>>> Not at all. We're going by what YOU say, not by what I say. That is
>>> what
>>> we
>>> are talking about here.
>>
>>We? Seems like it's mostly you. I don't know where you find the time
>>between meals.
>
> No, no, no. You can't even keep track of your own arguments. We are
> discussing a comment that you made, and all of the sudden you can't recall
> if
> we're talking about what you said or what I said. It's pretty pathetic.
>
>>
>> Can you understand that?
>>>
>>> Of course not. ****ing moron.
>>>
>>Can you understand that absolutely nothing you have to say has any
>>importance to me?
>
> Absolutely nothing anyone has to say has any importance to you.

By god I think you are beginning to get it.

That's why you
> look like an idiot.

To you, so what?

You have no concept of what you look like to others.

That brings us back to the aprt about not caring.

But,
> for the record, the answer is "a complete and utter idiot."
>
> I didn't think so, you're too obsessed with trying to
>>seem like you are important.
>
> Actually, that's pretty far from the truth. But that says a lot more
> about you
> and your dissatisfaction with your life than it does about me.
>

What well adjusted person tells people to leave a newsgroup?
What well adjusted person accuses people of pedophilia with no proof?
What well adjusted person nitpicks spelling and grammar on a NG?

What well adjusted person gives a flying **** what anybody's opinion is on a
NG?

It's a public forum, I get to say whatever I want, just as you do.
If you don't like what I say or how I say it you have 3 realistic choices,
that have any chance of working.

1. Don't read what I write.
2. Don't respond to what I write.
3. Try not being such a jerk yourself.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>> I admit what I do is just as bad, why won't you?
>>
>
> Because I haven't falsley accused you of sending
> me kiddie pron pictures.
>
IIRC he didn't accuse so much as suspect. If I were Arny and had the type
of peanut gallery he does I would be suspicious too.

That being said, it makes no sense and no difference to the situation to
constantly harp on the fact that you hate Arny.

Aside from the recreational aspects what are you getting out all the
flaming?

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>

>>
> I like it here, in spite of ****heads like you, so I won't be going
> anywhere.
>

He is just another Howard......
"At least" you are not a professional audio clown.
You are merely an ordinary idiot.

[Bruce J. Richman]

Scott Wheeler wrote:


>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: . net>
>>
>>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>
>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>
>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.
>>>
>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>
>>
>
>
>He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would your
>attack
>be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your
>selfrighteousness
>is really pathetic.
>
>

Making fun of somebody's physical appearance, as McKelvy despicably has done,
is just more evidence that he's desperate. He's been exposed very convincingly
as a compulsive, delusional liar and delusional asshole. Since he has no facts
(nor has he ever had any facts) to back up or support his bull****, this is his
typical last resort.



Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

George M. Middius wrote:

>S888Wheel said to Mickey:
>
>> He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would your
>attack
>> be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your
>selfrighteousness
>> is really pathetic.
>
>Try picturing Mickey with wild eyes, an unshaven face, a few missing
>teeth, and an unkempt mat of greasy hair. And he's foaming at the mouth.
>Now do you feel sorry for him?
>
>

I think that's pretty close to the picture we all have, except you forgot to
mention the feces-encrusted nose, and a tag around his big toe saying "Made in
Detroit".



Bruce J. Richman

[Bruce J. Richman]

Clyde Slick wrote:


>"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
>> I admit what I do is just as bad, why won't you?
>>
>
>Because I haven't falsley accused you of sending
>me kiddie pron pictures.
>
>

Also, we don't have a 7 year history of making proven false claims and libelous
statements about another person's identity, their professional activities,
their educational background, and other credentials. And we haven't insulted
the intelligence of everybody else by claiming seven years later that they were
just "opinions".



Bruce J. Richman

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>
>>> I admit what I do is just as bad, why won't you?
>>>
>>
>> Because I haven't falsley accused you of sending
>> me kiddie pron pictures.
>>
> IIRC he didn't accuse so much as suspect. If I were Arny and had the type
> of peanut gallery he does I would be suspicious too.
>

You still don't get it. Nobody sent him
any porn pictures. He nade it all up.

> That being said, it makes no sense and no difference to the situation to
> constantly harp on the fact that you hate Arny.
>

He pollutes the group. Two people can't have a pleasant exchange about
tubes or vinyl without him butting in with his hate agenda.


> Aside from the recreational aspects what are you getting out all the
> flaming?


What else is there about a rec. group than recreation?

[Clyde Slick]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> Scott Wheeler wrote:
>
>
>>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.
>>>>
>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would your
>>attack
>>be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your
>>selfrighteousness
>>is really pathetic.
>>
>>
>
> Making fun of somebody's physical appearance, as McKelvy despicably has
> done,
> is just more evidence that he's desperate. He's been exposed very
> convincingly
> as a compulsive, delusional liar and delusional asshole. Since he has no
> facts
> (nor has he ever had any facts) to back up or support his bull****, this
> is his
> typical last resort.
>
>
>
> Bruce J. Richman
>
>


he sounds just like a demented five year old.

[Ruud Broens]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...

:
:
: What else is there about a rec. group than recreation?
:
Well, I'd like to think that intelligent readers can come away
with more knowledge, better understanding, friendship
some wisdom in life
as well :-)
Rudy

[S888Wheel]

>Catching?
>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: . net>
>

>
> That's why you
>> look like an idiot.
>
>To you, so what?

No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underpants
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or just a residue from your last butt munching session with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You're standing to [sic] close to Boon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Now you're hearing things too?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That didn't make any sense, Mikey.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound
>>>>>>>>>>>stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>at
>>>>>>>>>> all."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Sound implies hearing, dimwit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic
>>>>>>>>>> grammar
>>>>>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like
>>>>>>>>>spelling.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I think you're lying.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that
>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone
>>>>>>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> lying, too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are
>>>>>>>>>>>an
>>>>>>>>>>>obnoxious twit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> OSAF.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for
>>>>>>>>>> others,
>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you consider yourself a thug.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a
>>>>>>>defensive
>>>>>>>move.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, in your opinion, two wrongs make a right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>So in your opinion you're doing wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Not at all. We're going by what YOU say, not by what I say. That is
>>>> what
>>>> we
>>>> are talking about here.
>>>
>>>We? Seems like it's mostly you. I don't know where you find the time
>>>between meals.
>>
>> No, no, no. You can't even keep track of your own arguments. We are
>> discussing a comment that you made, and all of the sudden you can't recall
>> if
>> we're talking about what you said or what I said. It's pretty pathetic.
>>
>>>
>>> Can you understand that?
>>>>
>>>> Of course not. ****ing moron.
>>>>
>>>Can you understand that absolutely nothing you have to say has any
>>>importance to me?
>>
>> Absolutely nothing anyone has to say has any importance to you.
>
>By god [sic] I think you are beginning to get it.
>
> That's why you
>> look like an idiot.
>
>To you, so what?

It is an opinion group. And it is an opinion shared by an overwhelming
majority.

>
> You have no concept of what you look like to others.
>
>That brings us back to the aprt [sic] about not caring.

And the part about your stupidity.

>
> But,
>> for the record, the answer is "a complete and utter idiot."
>>
>> I didn't think so, you're too obsessed with trying to
>>>seem like you are important.
>>
>> Actually, that's pretty far from the truth. But that says a lot more
>> about you
>> and your dissatisfaction with your life than it does about me.
>>
>
>What well adjusted person tells people to leave a newsgroup?

One who is sick and tired of people who don't know how to interact
appropriately with others.

>What well adjusted person accuses people of pedophilia with no proof?

None. That's why I waited until there was a significant amount of proof until
I accused Arny of anything.

>What well adjusted person nitpicks spelling and grammar on a NG?

When it gets to the point where the meaning is clouded, something needs to be
said.

>
>What well adjusted person gives a flying **** what anybody's opinion is on a
>NG?

Every well-adjusted person. People do care what other people think of them.
It's completely natural. The people who run around saying that they don't care
are usually the ones that care the most and have the most emotional issues.
And the people who genuinely don't care at all are usually called sociopaths.

>
>It's a public forum, I get to say whatever I want, just as you do.

But watching as large groups of people prove you to be utterly wrong about
everything, and watching you utterly deny that you are wrong, well, it's too
much of a distraction and waste to the group. It would be a little more
tolerable if you were talking about audio, but no, it's all about your
questionable politics or your blind allegiance to despicable people. You bring
the quality of this newsgroup down.

>If you don't like what I say or how I say it you have 3 realistic choices,
>that have any chance of working.
>
>1. Don't read what I write.
>2. Don't respond to what I write.
>3. Try not being such a jerk yourself.

Wow, Mikey, that's profound. I have no problem with killfiling people, except
that it doesn't work when most of the energy of the others is spent trying to
convince you that you are an utter idiot and that you don't belong here. I try
not to read your posts, but when well over half of the posts in RAO involve you
and responses to your avid idiocy, then something needs to be said.

You need to leave.

Boon

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Scott Wheeler wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>> man.
>>>>>
>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would your
>>>attack
>>>be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your
>>>selfrighteousness
>>>is really pathetic.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Making fun of somebody's physical appearance, as McKelvy despicably has
>> done,
>> is just more evidence that he's desperate. He's been exposed very
>> convincingly
>> as a compulsive, delusional liar and delusional asshole. Since he has no
>> facts
>> (nor has he ever had any facts) to back up or support his bull****, this
>> is his
>> typical last resort.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bruce J. Richman
>>
>>
>
>
> he sounds just like a demented five year old.
>
Is that better or worse than sounding like a demented 40 year old?
Is it better or worse than some of the other behavior that I never see
condemned. Attacking and name calling of family members is OK with you, as
has been done by people like Middius?

I'm no saint, but I sure as hell ain't the worst.

[Michael McKelvy]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >Catching?
>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: . net>
>>
>
>>
>> That's why you
>>> look like an idiot.
>>
>>To you, so what?
>
> No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.

And I should care because......?

When you can say that you don't act as badly, then you will have room to
complain.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.
>>>>
>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> He's not particularly fat.
>
>I saw the picture, he's pretty

I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about that 2001 photo?
Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your agenda?

****ing moron.

>
> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>
>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I wouldn't be
>talking about how fat his is.

I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being retarded.

>
> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>> is really pathetic.
>
>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people I
>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you can say
>on a public forum.

No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an NG asking me
to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think that normal
people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick, lonely,
****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they like being
sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick, ****ed-up and
stupid.

>
>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
>understand the meaning.

True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your meaning becomes
clouded. And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
are, and that's pretty amusing. So you do have SOME entertainment value,
Mikey.

>
>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can communicate.

No, moron. Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong. He probably could have found
more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he thought he'd
just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly beyond my
understanding.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight man.
>>>>
>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>
>> Really? That's it? What a ****ing wimp you are. Leave the NG. You're
>> too
>> stupid.
>> Oh wait. Let me rephrase it so that you can understand: Your to stupid.
>>
>I like it here, in spite of ****heads like you, so I won't be going
>anywhere.

How can you like being in a place where everyone constantly points out how
stupid you are? You don't like being here in spite of us, you like being here
because of us. You're a masochist, McKelvy. Just admit it already.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>Phillips has a long
>history of very vicious attacks, most of which I've let pass. Where was
>your condemnation of those attacks?

Show where I've viciously attacked someone without them attacking me first.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>I'm no saint, but I sure as hell ain't the worst.

Nope, you're not. You're just the dumbest. By a long shot, too.

Boon

[John Atkinson]

Michael McKelvy wrote:
> What well adjusted person accuses people of pedophilia with
> no proof?

At last you begin to get it, Mr. McKelvy. Perhaps you might want
to have a word with Arny Krueger about his having publicly accused
me of sending him porn or arranging to have porn sent to him without
any evidence whatsoever.

> What well adjusted person nitpicks spelling and grammar on a NG?

Again, you begin to get it, Mr. McKelvy. Again, if you feel this
way, you should talk to Arny Krueger about his propesnity to do
just this.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>Phillips has a long
>>history of very vicious attacks, most of which I've let pass. Where was
>>your condemnation of those attacks?
>
> Show where I've viciously attacked someone without them attacking me
> first.
>
Where was the attack against you in "Krooger In the Movies?" Did it come
before or after you made a ****ty comment?

Where did Howard attack you in "Ferstler Announces Again?"

Who attacked you first in Tony Loban's "Question for George M. Middius?"

Those are just the first things I found in a few minutes.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>> man.
>>>>>
>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> He's not particularly fat.
>>
>>I saw the picture, he's pretty
>
> I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about that 2001
> photo?
> Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your agenda?
>
> ****ing moron.
>
>>
>> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>>
>>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I wouldn't be
>>talking about how fat his is.
>
> I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being retarded.
>
>>
>> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>>> is really pathetic.
>>
>>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people I
>>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you can
>>say
>>on a public forum.
>
> No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an NG asking
> me
> to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think that normal
> people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick, lonely,
> ****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they like
> being
> sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick, ****ed-up and
> stupid.
>
>>
>>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
>>understand the meaning.
>
> True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your meaning
> becomes
> clouded.

Then how is it that most people don't have that trouble?

And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
> are, and that's pretty amusing.

The same could be said about Richman, Sackman and others.

So you do have SOME entertainment value,
> Mikey.
>
>>
>>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can
>>communicate.
>
> No, moron.

Gratuitous name calling noted.

Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
> people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong.

Lionel gets into trouble for taking positions at odds with the facts and for
trying to make moral equivilance between Hamas and Israel, among other
things.

He probably could have found
> more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he thought
> he'd
> just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly beyond
> my
> understanding.
>
> Boon
>

Your level of vitriol is beyond my understanding. You appear to think you
have some sort of extra credibility or standing here.

A check of Google shows a lot of threads by people who don't seem to like
you very much. Are they all mistaken?

[Clyde Slick]

"Ruud Broens" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> :
> :
> : What else is there about a rec. group than recreation?
> :
> Well, I'd like to think that intelligent readers can come away
> with more knowledge, better understanding, friendship
> some wisdom in life
> as well :-)
> Rudy
>
>

one can find much better sources of knowledge elsewhere.
This can be a place to make some audio friends, and
it has been, for me.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He's not particularly fat.
>>>
>>>I saw the picture, he's pretty
>>
>> I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about that 2001
>> photo?
>> Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your agenda?
>>
>> ****ing moron.
>>
>>>
>>> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>>>
>>>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I wouldn't be
>>>talking about how fat his is.
>>
>> I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being retarded.
>>
>>>
>>> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>
>>>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people I
>>>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you can
>>>say
>>>on a public forum.
>>
>> No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an NG asking
>> me
>> to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think that normal
>> people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick, lonely,
>> ****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they like
>> being
>> sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick, ****ed-up and
>> stupid.
>>
>>>
>>>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
>>>understand the meaning.
>>
>> True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your meaning
>> becomes
>> clouded.
>
>Then how is it that most people don't have that trouble?

You mean doing so many typos that their meaning becomes clouded? Like I said,
you're not smart enough to be here.

Actually, I know what you're trying to say, but once again you ****ed up the
syntax of your sentence. Case in point, moron.

>
> And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
>> are, and that's pretty amusing.
>
>The same could be said about Richman, Sackman and others.

But it's more notable and predictable and repeatable with you. How's that for
the Scientific Method?

>
> So you do have SOME entertainment value,
>> Mikey.
>>
>>>
>>>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can
>>>communicate.
>>
>> No, moron.
>
>Gratuitous name calling noted.

Poor baby. That sounds mighty noble coming from the guy who's been calling me
fat based upon a picture from when my diabetes meds were ****ing me up.

>
> Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
>> people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong.
>
>Lionel gets into trouble for taking positions at odds with the facts and for
>trying to make moral equivilance between Hamas and Israel, among other
>things.

That's not what I'm talking about at all. Big surprise.

>
> He probably could have found
>> more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he thought
>> he'd
>> just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly beyond
>> my
>> understanding.
>>
>> Boon
>>
>
>Your level of vitriol is beyond my understanding. You appear to think you
>have some sort of extra credibility or standing here.

"Appear" would be the operative word here, Mikey. It's all about your
perception of me. Frankly, I think you're way too ****ed up in the head to
come up with any real valid comments about me or who I am.

>
>A check of Google shows a lot of threads by people who don't seem to like
>you very much. Are they all mistaken?

That's a broad question, Mikey, rife with bull****. How come you didn't
provide an example? And how do these threads compare in number to the threads
that have been started by people who don't like you? Mikey, your mind is ****.
You argue like a retard. It's time for you to go.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >Catching?
>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: . net>
>>
>
>>
>> That's why you
>>> look like an idiot.
>>
>>To you, so what?
>
> No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.

Mikey's retinue is down to zero.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>Phillips has a long
>>>history of very vicious attacks, most of which I've let pass. Where was
>>>your condemnation of those attacks?
>>
>> Show where I've viciously attacked someone without them attacking me
>> first.
>>
>Where was the attack against you in "Krooger In the Movies?" Did it come
>before or after you made a ****ty comment?

What's the matter...can't you provide a URL? If we're talking about Arny, then
it's he who attacked first by claiming I won the Aloia amplifier in a
suspicious way. Then he accused me of making "horrific comments about the
death of his son," when in reality I denounced those who did so. So are you
saying, in your typical moronic way, that I should wipe the slate clean every
time a new thread is started?

>
>Where did Howard attack you in "Ferstler Announces Again?"

Howard attacked first when he called me names for preferring the sound of
vinyl.

>
>Who attacked you first in Tony Loban's "Question for George M. Middius?"

Tony Loban was a sockpuppet created specifically to attack those who attack
Arny, done by a person who was playing a game by joining "the wrong side."

Please tell me you have better examples than this.

Boon

[Bruce J. Richman]

Clyde Slick wrote:


>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>> >Catching?
>>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> That's why you
>>>> look like an idiot.
>>>
>>>To you, so what?
>>
>> No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.
>
>Mikey's retinue is down to zero.
>
>
>

Probably true, unless one counts sockpuppets with no visible proof of identity.



Bruce J. Richman

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>Phillips has a long
>>>>history of very vicious attacks, most of which I've let pass. Where was
>>>>your condemnation of those attacks?
>>>
>>> Show where I've viciously attacked someone without them attacking me
>>> first.
>>>
>>Where was the attack against you in "Krooger In the Movies?" Did it come
>>before or after you made a ****ty comment?
>
> What's the matter...can't you provide a URL?

Just go to Google and enter your name.

If we're talking about Arny, then
> it's he who attacked first by claiming I won the Aloia amplifier in a
> suspicious way. Then he accused me of making "horrific comments about the
> death of his son," when in reality I denounced those who did so. So are
> you
> saying, in your typical moronic way, that I should wipe the slate clean
> every
> time a new thread is started?
>
I ususally do. I try to start every response in a new thread in a
non-inflammatory way.

>>
>>Where did Howard attack you in "Ferstler Announces Again?"
>
> Howard attacked first when he called me names for preferring the sound of
> vinyl.
>
Perhaps I didn't go back far enough in that particular thread.

>>
>>Who attacked you first in Tony Loban's "Question for George M. Middius?"
>
> Tony Loban was a sockpuppet created specifically to attack those who
> attack
> Arny, done by a person who was playing a game by joining "the wrong side."
>
In your opinion.

> Please tell me you have better examples than this.
>
Next time I'll spend an extra 10 minutes.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He's not particularly fat.
>>>>
>>>>I saw the picture, he's pretty
>>>
>>> I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about that 2001
>>> photo?
>>> Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your agenda?
>>>
>>> ****ing moron.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>>>>
>>>>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I wouldn't be
>>>>talking about how fat his is.
>>>
>>> I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being retarded.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>>
>>>>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people I
>>>>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you can
>>>>say
>>>>on a public forum.
>>>
>>> No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an NG
>>> asking
>>> me
>>> to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think that
>>> normal
>>> people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick, lonely,
>>> ****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they like
>>> being
>>> sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick, ****ed-up
>>> and
>>> stupid.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
>>>>understand the meaning.
>>>
>>> True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your meaning
>>> becomes
>>> clouded.
>>
>>Then how is it that most people don't have that trouble?
>
> You mean doing so many typos that their meaning becomes clouded? Like I
> said,
> you're not smart enough to be here.
>
> Actually, I know what you're trying to say, but once again you ****ed up
> the
> syntax of your sentence. Case in point, moron.
>
>>
>> And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
>>> are, and that's pretty amusing.
>>
>>The same could be said about Richman, Sackman and others.
>
> But it's more notable and predictable and repeatable with you. How's that
> for
> the Scientific Method?
>
>>
>> So you do have SOME entertainment value,
>>> Mikey.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can
>>>>communicate.
>>>
>>> No, moron.
>>
>>Gratuitous name calling noted.
>
> Poor baby. That sounds mighty noble coming from the guy who's been
> calling me
> fat based upon a picture from when my diabetes meds were ****ing me up.
>
>>
>> Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
>>> people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong.
>>
>>Lionel gets into trouble for taking positions at odds with the facts and
>>for
>>trying to make moral equivilance between Hamas and Israel, among other
>>things.
>
> That's not what I'm talking about at all. Big surprise.
>

It's one of the reasons he gets in trouble, which is what you were talking
about.
>>
>> He probably could have found
>>> more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he thought
>>> he'd
>>> just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly beyond
>>> my
>>> understanding.
>>>
>>> Boon
>>>
>>
>>Your level of vitriol is beyond my understanding. You appear to think you
>>have some sort of extra credibility or standing here.
>
> "Appear" would be the operative word here, Mikey. It's all about your
> perception of me. Frankly, I think you're way too ****ed up in the head
> to
> come up with any real valid comments about me or who I am.
>

Ii have to use the evidence you present, which is all pretty nasty.
>>
>>A check of Google shows a lot of threads by people who don't seem to like
>>you very much. Are they all mistaken?
>
> That's a broad question, Mikey, rife with bull****. How come you didn't
> provide an example? And how do these threads compare in number to the
> threads
> that have been started by people who don't like you?

I think you win, but I'd have to check.

Mikey, your mind is ****.
> You argue like a retard. It's time for you to go.
>

You first.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
> ...
>> >Catching?
>>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> That's why you
>>>> look like an idiot.
>>>
>>>To you, so what?
>>
>> No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.
>
> Mikey's retinue is down to zero.
Am I supposed to care?

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> >Catching?
>>>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's why you
>>>>> look like an idiot.
>>>>
>>>>To you, so what?
>>>
>>> No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.
>>
>> Mikey's retinue is down to zero.
> Am I supposed to care?
>

Not if you don't mind that you are generally considerd to be a stupid
asshole.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
> ...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's not particularly fat.
>>>>>
>>>>>I saw the picture, he's pretty
>>>>
>>>> I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about that
>>>> 2001
>>>> photo?
>>>> Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your agenda?
>>>>
>>>> ****ing moron.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>>>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>>>>>
>>>>>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I wouldn't
>>>>>be
>>>>>talking about how fat his is.
>>>>
>>>> I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being retarded.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>>>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people I
>>>>>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you
>>>>>can
>>>>>say
>>>>>on a public forum.
>>>>
>>>> No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an NG
>>>> asking
>>>> me
>>>> to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think that
>>>> normal
>>>> people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick,
>>>> lonely,
>>>> ****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they like
>>>> being
>>>> sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick, ****ed-up
>>>> and
>>>> stupid.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
>>>>>understand the meaning.
>>>>
>>>> True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your meaning
>>>> becomes
>>>> clouded.
>>>
>>>Then how is it that most people don't have that trouble?
>>
>> You mean doing so many typos that their meaning becomes clouded? Like I
>> said,
>> you're not smart enough to be here.
>>
>> Actually, I know what you're trying to say, but once again you ****ed up
>> the
>> syntax of your sentence. Case in point, moron.
>>
>>>
>>> And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
>>>> are, and that's pretty amusing.
>>>
>>>The same could be said about Richman, Sackman and others.
>>
>> But it's more notable and predictable and repeatable with you. How's
>> that for
>> the Scientific Method?
>>
>>>
>>> So you do have SOME entertainment value,
>>>> Mikey.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can
>>>>>communicate.
>>>>
>>>> No, moron.
>>>
>>>Gratuitous name calling noted.
>>
>> Poor baby. That sounds mighty noble coming from the guy who's been
>> calling me
>> fat based upon a picture from when my diabetes meds were ****ing me up.
>>
>>>
>>> Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
>>>> people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong.
>>>
>>>Lionel gets into trouble for taking positions at odds with the facts and
>>>for
>>>trying to make moral equivilance between Hamas and Israel, among other
>>>things.
>>
>> That's not what I'm talking about at all. Big surprise.
>>
>
> It's one of the reasons he gets in trouble, which is what you were talking
> about.
>>>
>>> He probably could have found
>>>> more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he thought
>>>> he'd
>>>> just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly
>>>> beyond
>>>> my
>>>> understanding.
>>>>
>>>> Boon
>>>>
>>>
>>>Your level of vitriol is beyond my understanding. You appear to think
>>>you
>>>have some sort of extra credibility or standing here.
>>
>> "Appear" would be the operative word here, Mikey. It's all about your
>> perception of me. Frankly, I think you're way too ****ed up in the head
>> to
>> come up with any real valid comments about me or who I am.
>>
>
> Ii have to use the evidence you present, which is all pretty nasty.
>>>
>>>A check of Google shows a lot of threads by people who don't seem to like
>>>you very much. Are they all mistaken?
>>
>> That's a broad question, Mikey, rife with bull****. How come you didn't
>> provide an example? And how do these threads compare in number to the
>> threads
>> that have been started by people who don't like you?
>
> I think you win, but I'd have to check.
>
> Mikey, your mind is ****.
>> You argue like a retard. It's time for you to go.
>>
>
> You first.
>

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
> ...

>
> Mikey, your mind is ****.
>> You argue like a retard. It's time for you to go.
>>
>
> You first.
>

Point proven!

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> >Catching?
>>>>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's why you
>>>>>> look like an idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>>To you, so what?
>>>>
>>>> No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.
>>>
>>> Mikey's retinue is down to zero.
>> Am I supposed to care?
>>
>
> Not if you don't mind that you are generally considerd to be a stupid
> asshole.
>
I just consider the source.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>> ...
>
>>
>> Mikey, your mind is ****.
>>> You argue like a retard. It's time for you to go.
>>>
>>
>> You first.
>>
>
> Point proven!
>

Humor missed.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Phillips has a long
>>>>>>history of very vicious attacks, most of which I've let pass. Where
>>>>>>was
>>>>>>your condemnation of those attacks?
>>>>>
>>>>> Show where I've viciously attacked someone without them attacking me
>>>>> first.
>>>>>
>>>>Where was the attack against you in "Krooger In the Movies?" Did it
>>>>come
>>>>before or after you made a ****ty comment?
>>>
>>> What's the matter...can't you provide a URL?
>>
>>Just go to Google and enter your name.
>
> Google doesn't have the wherewithal to find the root of the argument,
> especially if it began in one thread and carried over into another.
> Unless you
> want to look up every post I've ever written, your little search there
> will be
> biased toward whatever point you think you're proving.
>
>>
>> If we're talking about Arny, then
>>> it's he who attacked first by claiming I won the Aloia amplifier in a
>>> suspicious way. Then he accused me of making "horrific comments about
>>> the
>>> death of his son," when in reality I denounced those who did so. So are
>>> you
>>> saying, in your typical moronic way, that I should wipe the slate clean
>>> every
>>> time a new thread is started?
>>>
>>I ususally do. I try to start every response in a new thread in a
>>non-inflammatory way.
>
> Sorry, but that makes no sense. If you have someone you're fighting with,
> do
> you automatically forgive them when they change the subject? Besides,
> that's
> part of the reason why Arny is so despised, because of his habit of
> storming
> into threads and attacking people based upon his past history with them.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>Where did Howard attack you in "Ferstler Announces Again?"
>>>
>>> Howard attacked first when he called me names for preferring the sound
>>> of
>>> vinyl.
>>>
>>Perhaps I didn't go back far enough in that particular thread.
>
> Ya think?
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>Who attacked you first in Tony Loban's "Question for George M. Middius?"
>>>
>>> Tony Loban was a sockpuppet created specifically to attack those who
>>> attack
>>> Arny, done by a person who was playing a game by joining "the wrong
>>> side."
>>>
>>In your opinion.
>
> And in the opinion of the person operating the sockpuppet, who admitted
> that
> was the reason.
>
>>
>>> Please tell me you have better examples than this.
>>>
>>Next time I'll spend an extra 10 minutes.
>
> Please do. I'm tired of your idiocy. You argue like old people ****.
>
Envy noted.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's not particularly fat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I saw the picture, he's pretty
>>>>>
>>>>> I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about that
>>>>> 2001
>>>>> photo?
>>>>> Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your agenda?
>>>>>
>>>>> ****ing moron.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>>>>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I wouldn't
>>>>>>be
>>>>>>talking about how fat his is.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being retarded.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>>>>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people I
>>>>>>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you
>>>>>>can
>>>>>>say
>>>>>>on a public forum.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an NG
>>>>> asking
>>>>> me
>>>>> to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think that
>>>>> normal
>>>>> people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick,
>>>>> lonely,
>>>>> ****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they
>>>>> like
>>>>> being
>>>>> sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick, ****ed-up
>>>>> and
>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
>>>>>>understand the meaning.
>>>>>
>>>>> True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your meaning
>>>>> becomes
>>>>> clouded.
>>>>
>>>>Then how is it that most people don't have that trouble?
>>>
>>> You mean doing so many typos that their meaning becomes clouded? Like I
>>> said,
>>> you're not smart enough to be here.
>>>
>>> Actually, I know what you're trying to say, but once again you ****ed up
>>> the
>>> syntax of your sentence. Case in point, moron.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
>>>>> are, and that's pretty amusing.
>>>>
>>>>The same could be said about Richman, Sackman and others.
>>>
>>> But it's more notable and predictable and repeatable with you. How's
>>> that
>>> for
>>> the Scientific Method?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you do have SOME entertainment value,
>>>>> Mikey.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can
>>>>>>communicate.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, moron.
>>>>
>>>>Gratuitous name calling noted.
>>>
>>> Poor baby. That sounds mighty noble coming from the guy who's been
>>> calling me
>>> fat based upon a picture from when my diabetes meds were ****ing me up.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
>>>>> people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong.
>>>>
>>>>Lionel gets into trouble for taking positions at odds with the facts and
>>>>for
>>>>trying to make moral equivilance between Hamas and Israel, among other
>>>>things.
>>>
>>> That's not what I'm talking about at all. Big surprise.
>>>
>>
>>It's one of the reasons he gets in trouble, which is what you were talking
>>about.
>
> He got in trouble because he attacked people based on things he thought
> they
> said, rather than his own political views.
>
>>>>
>>>> He probably could have found
>>>>> more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he thought
>>>>> he'd
>>>>> just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly
>>>>> beyond
>>>>> my
>>>>> understanding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Boon
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Your level of vitriol is beyond my understanding. You appear to think
>>>>you
>>>>have some sort of extra credibility or standing here.
>>>
>>> "Appear" would be the operative word here, Mikey. It's all about your
>>> perception of me. Frankly, I think you're way too ****ed up in the head
>>> to
>>> come up with any real valid comments about me or who I am.
>>>
>>
>>Ii [sic] have to use the evidence you present, which is all pretty nasty.
>
> Again, your illiteracy trips you up. Try again. Take your time, moron.
>
>>>>
>>>>A check of Google shows a lot of threads by people who don't seem to
>>>>like
>>>>you very much. Are they all mistaken?
>>>
>>> That's a broad question, Mikey, rife with bull****. How come you didn't
>>> provide an example? And how do these threads compare in number to the
>>> threads
>>> that have been started by people who don't like you?
>>
>>I think you win, but I'd have to check.
>
> In other words, you like making claims without checking the facts.

I didn't make a claim.

Most of
> Arny's supporters have the same problem. Why is that?
>
Being deliberately misunderstood and having every word parsed to the nth
degree, so you can pretend not to understand? I guess that's really only a
problem if you choose to make it so.
>>

[Michael McKelvy]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >From: George M. Middius
>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:06 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: >
>>
>>
>>
>>S888Wheel said to Mickey:
>>
>>> He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would your
>>attack
>>> be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your
>>selfrighteousness
>>> is really pathetic.
>>
>>Try picturing Mickey with wild eyes, an unshaven face, a few missing
>>teeth, and an unkempt mat of greasy hair. And he's foaming at the mouth.
>>Now do you feel sorry for him?
>>
>
> Yeah. Living out of fear and anger is really sad.

By now you should know I don't match the above description, I certainly do
not live out of fear or anger. I do get angry when people are as nasty and
vindictive as some here, but I think that's more a sign of normality, since
more than a few newbies have commented on the same fact.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> >Catching?
>>>>>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's why you
>>>>>>> look like an idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>To you, so what?
>>>>>
>>>>> No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.
>>>>
>>>> Mikey's retinue is down to zero.
>>> Am I supposed to care?
>>>
>>
>> Not if you don't mind that you are generally considerd to be a stupid
>> asshole.
>>
> I just consider the source.
>

that's sourceS, many of them. Anybody but a die hard Kroopologist can see
it.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
nk.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>
>>>
>>> Mikey, your mind is ****.
>>>> You argue like a retard. It's time for you to go.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You first.
>>>
>>
>> Point proven!
>>
>
> Humor missed.
>

A imbecilic and dhildish 'you first'
response is supposed pot be humorous?

Oh, I get it,.
Haw, haw, haw

[Clyde Slick]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Phillips has a long
>>>>>>history of very vicious attacks, most of which I've let pass. Where
>>>>>>was
>>>>>>your condemnation of those attacks?
>>>>>
>>>>> Show where I've viciously attacked someone without them attacking me
>>>>> first.
>>>>>
>>>>Where was the attack against you in "Krooger In the Movies?" Did it
>>>>come
>>>>before or after you made a ****ty comment?
>>>
>>> What's the matter...can't you provide a URL?
>>
>>Just go to Google and enter your name.
>
> Google doesn't have the wherewithal to find the root of the argument,
> especially if it began in one thread and carried over into another.
> Unless you
> want to look up every post I've ever written, your little search there
> will be
> biased toward whatever point you think you're proving.
>
>>
>> If we're talking about Arny, then
>>> it's he who attacked first by claiming I won the Aloia amplifier in a
>>> suspicious way. Then he accused me of making "horrific comments about
>>> the
>>> death of his son," when in reality I denounced those who did so. So are
>>> you
>>> saying, in your typical moronic way, that I should wipe the slate clean
>>> every
>>> time a new thread is started?
>>>
>>I ususally do. I try to start every response in a new thread in a
>>non-inflammatory way.
>
> Sorry, but that makes no sense. If you have someone you're fighting with,
> do
> you automatically forgive them when they change the subject? Besides,
> that's
> part of the reason why Arny is so despised, because of his habit of
> storming
> into threads and attacking people based upon his past history with them.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>Where did Howard attack you in "Ferstler Announces Again?"
>>>
>>> Howard attacked first when he called me names for preferring the sound
>>> of
>>> vinyl.
>>>
>>Perhaps I didn't go back far enough in that particular thread.
>
> Ya think?
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>Who attacked you first in Tony Loban's "Question for George M. Middius?"
>>>
>>> Tony Loban was a sockpuppet created specifically to attack those who
>>> attack
>>> Arny, done by a person who was playing a game by joining "the wrong
>>> side."
>>>
>>In your opinion.
>
> And in the opinion of the person operating the sockpuppet, who admitted
> that
> was the reason.
>
>>
>>> Please tell me you have better examples than this.
>>>
>>Next time I'll spend an extra 10 minutes.
>
> Please do. I'm tired of your idiocy. You argue like old people ****.
>

That's like, Lord knows, this could be the last time!

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> ink.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> >Catching?
>>>>>>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's why you
>>>>>>>> look like an idiot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>To you, so what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mikey's retinue is down to zero.
>>>> Am I supposed to care?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not if you don't mind that you are generally considerd to be a stupid
>>> asshole.
>>>
>> I just consider the source.
>>
>
> that's sourceS, many of them. Anybody but a die hard Kroopologist can see
> it.
I see it, I also see how small such people's behavior is. While I
admittedly slip, I try to be better than that.

Does it make you feel superior? I'm sorry that you and those who engage in
such behavior are so desperate in their need to make themselves feel better
than they are.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "S888Wheel" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> >Catching?
>>>>>>>>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's why you
>>>>>>>>> look like an idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>To you, so what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No Mike, to the majority of people posting here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mikey's retinue is down to zero.
>>>>> Am I supposed to care?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not if you don't mind that you are generally considerd to be a stupid
>>>> asshole.
>>>>
>>> I just consider the source.
>>>
>>
>> that's sourceS, many of them. Anybody but a die hard Kroopologist can see
>> it.
> I see it, I also see how small such people's behavior is. While I
> admittedly slip, I try to be better than that.
>
> Does it make you feel superior? I'm sorry that you and those who engage
> in such behavior are so desperate in their need to make themselves feel
> better than they are.
>

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> that's sourceS, many of them. Anybody but a die hard Kroopologist can see
>> it.
> I see it, I also see how small such people's behavior is. While I
> admittedly slip, I try to be better than that.
>
> Does it make you feel superior? I'm sorry that you and those who engage
> in such behavior are so desperate in their need to make themselves feel
> better than they are.

I would call your persistent and relentless willful vendetta against BJ's
credentials, without presenting any substantive evidence, more than
just a slip.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> nk.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>> ink.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mikey, your mind is ****.
>>>>> You argue like a retard. It's time for you to go.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You first.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Point proven!
>>>
>>
>> Humor missed.
>>
>
> A imbecilic and dhildish 'you first'
> response is supposed pot be humorous?
>
> Oh, I get it,.
> Haw, haw, haw
>
Not as funny as what you attempted to write above.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> that's sourceS, many of them. Anybody but a die hard Kroopologist can
>>> see it.
>> I see it, I also see how small such people's behavior is. While I
>> admittedly slip, I try to be better than that.
>>
>> Does it make you feel superior? I'm sorry that you and those who engage
>> in such behavior are so desperate in their need to make themselves feel
>> better than they are.
>
> I would call your persistent and relentless willful vendetta against BJ's
> credentials, without presenting any substantive evidence, more than
> just a slip.
>
Call it what you want, he's the one who keeps bringing it up. I never talk
about it unless he brings it up. He begs to have his chain pulled, so I
oblige.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> that's sourceS, many of them. Anybody but a die hard Kroopologist can
>>>> see it.
>>> I see it, I also see how small such people's behavior is. While I
>>> admittedly slip, I try to be better than that.
>>>
>>> Does it make you feel superior? I'm sorry that you and those who engage
>>> in such behavior are so desperate in their need to make themselves feel
>>> better than they are.
>>
>> I would call your persistent and relentless willful vendetta against BJ's
>> credentials, without presenting any substantive evidence, more than
>> just a slip.
>>
> Call it what you want, he's the one who keeps bringing it up. I never
> talk about it unless he brings it up. He begs to have his chain pulled,
> so I oblige.
>
>


Oh, another funny retort.
I get it.
haw, haw, haw.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>>> Am I supposed to care?
>>>
>>
>> Not if you don't mind that you are generally considerd to be a stupid
>> asshole.
>>
>I just consider the source.

The source is everyone but you. Consider that.

Boon

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>>> Am I supposed to care?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not if you don't mind that you are generally considerd to be a stupid
>>> asshole.
>>>
>>I just consider the source.
>
> The source is everyone but you. Consider that.
>
There are approx. 40 regular posters here, the peanut gallery is you and
about 5 others.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Bruce J. Richman" > wrote in message
...
> Clyde Slick wrote:
>
>
>>"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
link.net...
>>>
>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>> link.net...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ink.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
>>>>>>>> ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
>>>>>>>> will see that happen.
>>>>>>> Don't bet on it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "At least" Howard 'at least' Ferstler had the decency to hang his
>>>>>> head
>>>>>> in shame for a few weeks after being ousted
>>>>>> as a plagiarizer.
>>>>>>
>>>>> When I get something wrong I'll be sure and remember that.
>>>>>\
>>>> You just did.
>>> OSAF
>>>
>>
>>You hypocritical pile of ****. When you made all your accusations against
>>Richman's credentials, at the time you made them, you did not label them
>>as
>>opinions.
>>When threatened about itbeing libelous later, you backed down
>>and tried to excuse yourself by presenting them
>>as mere opinions.
>>
>>Can you see your hypocrucy? Can You? Look real hard, see it??
>>Take a long deep look into your soul. We canm all see it easily, you, you
>>are blind.
>>
>>Merry Christmas!
>>
>>
>
> Well stated. This hypocritical, sociopathic liar continues to deny his 7
> year
> campaign of libel and deliberate avoidance and denial of concrete evidence
> presented a number of tkimes. His pathetic attempts to call his blatant
> lies
> "opinions" didn't fool anybody, and if we ever end up in a courtroom, they
> won't fool a judge or jury either.

Still telling the same lies?

He's been challenged to present his
> libelous false claims to either the appropriate legal authorities and/or
> regulartory professional boards in Florida, since impersonation of a
> psychologist - one of many libelous false claims he's made - is a crime.

You've been challenged to prove you are who you say, in a way that is
painless and pretty much foll proof, why am I not surprised you won't take
up the offer?

> Needless to say, he hasn't done so, because he knows what the outcome will
> be.

Nothing is stopping you.

> He's also been challenged to publish his agenda-driven bull**** about me
> in an
> American print publication. Again, no response from this pathological
> liar,
> because he knows what the outcome will be.

No need to, I can pull your chain just fine right here.

>
> And now, in a further demonstration of his total lack of honesty, he tries
> to
> sell a bogus "proposal" about not talking about me or my background if
> certain
> conditions are met. The only condition that needs to be met is his
> decisiion
> to tell the truth for once in his miserable RAO existence.

Your existence doesn't make me miserable.

Or a decision to
> stop his 7 year campaign of libel and character assassination. Nothing
> else is
> needed - and it requires no action on my part.
>
>
>
Afraid of being found out?

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>> man.
>>>>>
>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>
>>> Really? That's it? What a ****ing wimp you are. Leave the NG. You're
>>> too
>>> stupid.
>>> Oh wait. Let me rephrase it so that you can understand: Your to
>>> stupid.
>>>
>>I like it here, in spite of ****heads like you, so I won't be going
>>anywhere.
>
> How can you like being in a place where everyone constantly points out how
> stupid you are?

You are not everyone. It wouldn't matter if you were.

You don't like being here in spite of us, you like being here
> because of us.

I like the audio talk that hapens every once in awhile. You should try it.

You're a masochist, McKelvy. Just admit it already.

You're a sadist, so it's like a yin and yang deal.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>>>>Message-id: . net>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's not particularly fat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I saw the picture, he's pretty
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about that
>>>>>> 2001
>>>>>> photo?
>>>>>> Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your agenda?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ****ing moron.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>>>>>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I wouldn't
>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>talking about how fat his is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being retarded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>>>>>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people I
>>>>>>>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you
>>>>>>>can
>>>>>>>say
>>>>>>>on a public forum.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an NG
>>>>>> asking
>>>>>> me
>>>>>> to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think that
>>>>>> normal
>>>>>> people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick,
>>>>>> lonely,
>>>>>> ****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> being
>>>>>> sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick, ****ed-up
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
>>>>>>>understand the meaning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your meaning
>>>>>> becomes
>>>>>> clouded.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then how is it that most people don't have that trouble?
>>>>
>>>> You mean doing so many typos that their meaning becomes clouded? Like I
>>>> said,
>>>> you're not smart enough to be here.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I know what you're trying to say, but once again you ****ed up
>>>> the
>>>> syntax of your sentence. Case in point, moron.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
>>>>>> are, and that's pretty amusing.
>>>>>
>>>>>The same could be said about Richman, Sackman and others.
>>>>
>>>> But it's more notable and predictable and repeatable with you. How's
>>>> that
>>>> for
>>>> the Scientific Method?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So you do have SOME entertainment value,
>>>>>> Mikey.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can
>>>>>>>communicate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, moron.
>>>>>
>>>>>Gratuitous name calling noted.
>>>>
>>>> Poor baby. That sounds mighty noble coming from the guy who's been
>>>> calling me
>>>> fat based upon a picture from when my diabetes meds were ****ing me up.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
>>>>>> people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>Lionel gets into trouble for taking positions at odds with the facts and
>>>>>for
>>>>>trying to make moral equivilance between Hamas and Israel, among other
>>>>>things.
>>>>
>>>> That's not what I'm talking about at all. Big surprise.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It's one of the reasons he gets in trouble, which is what you were talking
>>>about.
>>
>> He got in trouble because he attacked people based on things he thought
>> they
>> said, rather than his own political views.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He probably could have found
>>>>>> more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he thought
>>>>>> he'd
>>>>>> just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly
>>>>>> beyond
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> understanding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boon
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Your level of vitriol is beyond my understanding. You appear to think
>>>>>you
>>>>>have some sort of extra credibility or standing here.
>>>>
>>>> "Appear" would be the operative word here, Mikey. It's all about your
>>>> perception of me. Frankly, I think you're way too ****ed up in the head
>>>> to
>>>> come up with any real valid comments about me or who I am.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Ii [sic] have to use the evidence you present, which is all pretty nasty.
>>
>> Again, your illiteracy trips you up. Try again. Take your time, moron.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>A check of Google shows a lot of threads by people who don't seem to
>>>>>like
>>>>>you very much. Are they all mistaken?
>>>>
>>>> That's a broad question, Mikey, rife with bull****. How come you didn't
>>>> provide an example? And how do these threads compare in number to the
>>>> threads
>>>> that have been started by people who don't like you?
>>>
>>>I think you win, but I'd have to check.
>>
>> In other words, you like making claims without checking the facts.
>
>I didn't make a claim.

Yes, you did. You claimed that a check of Google reveals a lot of threads
started by people who don't sem to like me very much.

>
> Most of
>> Arny's supporters have the same problem. Why is that?
>>
>Being deliberately misunderstood and having every word parsed to the nth
>degree, so you can pretend not to understand? I guess that's really only a
>problem if you choose to make it so.

Nice way to rationalize your borderline illiteracy. Too bad you're still a
moron.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>> >From: George M. Middius
>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:06 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>S888Wheel said to Mickey:
>>>
>>>> He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would your
>>>attack
>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your
>>>selfrighteousness
>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>
>>>Try picturing Mickey with wild eyes, an unshaven face, a few missing
>>>teeth, and an unkempt mat of greasy hair. And he's foaming at the mouth.
>>>Now do you feel sorry for him?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah. Living out of fear and anger is really sad.
>
>By now you should know I don't match the above description,

How should we know that? Have you posted a pic?

I certainly do
>not live out of fear or anger. I do get angry when people are as nasty and
>vindictive as some here, but I think that's more a sign of normality, since
>more than a few newbies have commented on the same fact.

You might have a point if you weren't one of the people they were commenting
on.

Boon

[Bruce J. Richman]

Mr. Phillips wrote:


>McKelvy said:
>
>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>> >From: George M. Middius
>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:06 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>S888Wheel said to Mickey:
>>>>
>>>>> He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would your
>>>>attack
>>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your
>>>>selfrighteousness
>>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>>
>>>>Try picturing Mickey with wild eyes, an unshaven face, a few missing
>>>>teeth, and an unkempt mat of greasy hair. And he's foaming at the mouth.
>>>>Now do you feel sorry for him?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah. Living out of fear and anger is really sad.
>>
>>By now you should know I don't match the above description,
>
>How should we know that? Have you posted a pic?
>

Also, considering his history of 7 years worth of lies about the identities,
credentials and professional activities of others, why should anybody believe
what he says? Within the last 24 hours, he's engaged in another unprovoked
personal attack in a thread about Malesweski in which his name was never
mentioed. Therefore his claims about not attacking others in a thread until
attacked, are bull****.

Has there been any credible evidence presented that Mckelvy is not a Krueger
sockpuppet? If so, I haven't seen it. Therefore, until proven otherwise, we
can assume that McKelvy looks like Krueger.

>I certainly do
>>not live out of fear or anger. I do get angry when people are as nasty and
>>vindictive as some here, but I think that's more a sign of normality, since
>>more than a few newbies have commented on the same fact.
>
>You might have a point if you weren't one of the people they were commenting
>on.

His hypocritical complaints about others are as dishonest as his lies about
others.



>Boon
>
>



Bruce J. Richman

[S888Wheel]

>From: "Michael McKelvy"
>Date: 12/29/2004 1:47 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: et>
>
>
>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>> >From: George M. Middius
>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:06 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>S888Wheel said to Mickey:
>>>
>>>> He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would your
>>>attack
>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your
>>>selfrighteousness
>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>
>>>Try picturing Mickey with wild eyes, an unshaven face, a few missing
>>>teeth, and an unkempt mat of greasy hair. And he's foaming at the mouth.
>>>Now do you feel sorry for him?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah. Living out of fear and anger is really sad.
>
>By now you should know I don't match the above description, I certainly do
>not live out of fear or anger.

Looks that way to me. Hopefully things are different for you outside of RAO.

I do get angry when people are as nasty and
>vindictive as some here, but I think that's more a sign of normality, since
>more than a few newbies have commented on the same fact.


No, it would be a sign of taking things seriously here. A mistake that can be
forgiven of a newbie.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Phillips has a long
>>>>>>>>history of very vicious attacks, most of which I've let pass. Where
>>>>>>>>was
>>>>>>>>your condemnation of those attacks?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Show where I've viciously attacked someone without them attacking me
>>>>>>> first.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Where was the attack against you in "Krooger In the Movies?" Did it
>>>>>>come
>>>>>>before or after you made a ****ty comment?
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the matter...can't you provide a URL?
>>>>
>>>>Just go to Google and enter your name.
>>>
>>> Google doesn't have the wherewithal to find the root of the argument,
>>> especially if it began in one thread and carried over into another.
>>> Unless you
>>> want to look up every post I've ever written, your little search there
>>> will be
>>> biased toward whatever point you think you're proving.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If we're talking about Arny, then
>>>>> it's he who attacked first by claiming I won the Aloia amplifier in a
>>>>> suspicious way. Then he accused me of making "horrific comments about
>>>>> the
>>>>> death of his son," when in reality I denounced those who did so. So
>>>>> are
>>>>> you
>>>>> saying, in your typical moronic way, that I should wipe the slate
>>>>> clean
>>>>> every
>>>>> time a new thread is started?
>>>>>
>>>>I ususally do. I try to start every response in a new thread in a
>>>>non-inflammatory way.
>>>
>>> Sorry, but that makes no sense. If you have someone you're fighting
>>> with,
>>> do
>>> you automatically forgive them when they change the subject? Besides,
>>> that's
>>> part of the reason why Arny is so despised, because of his habit of
>>> storming
>>> into threads and attacking people based upon his past history with them.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Where did Howard attack you in "Ferstler Announces Again?"
>>>>>
>>>>> Howard attacked first when he called me names for preferring the sound
>>>>> of
>>>>> vinyl.
>>>>>
>>>>Perhaps I didn't go back far enough in that particular thread.
>>>
>>> Ya think?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Who attacked you first in Tony Loban's "Question for George M.
>>>>>>Middius?"
>>>>>
>>>>> Tony Loban was a sockpuppet created specifically to attack those who
>>>>> attack
>>>>> Arny, done by a person who was playing a game by joining "the wrong
>>>>> side."
>>>>>
>>>>In your opinion.
>>>
>>> And in the opinion of the person operating the sockpuppet, who admitted
>>> that
>>> was the reason.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Please tell me you have better examples than this.
>>>>>
>>>>Next time I'll spend an extra 10 minutes.
>>>
>>> Please do. I'm tired of your idiocy. You argue like old people ****.
>>>
>>Envy noted.
>
> What envy?

The fact that old people get to **** more than you of course.

What are you talking about?

Your obvious desparation that you are powerless to make anybody do anything.

Have you given up?

No, of course not. Why would I give up? This is as much my NG as
anybody's, possibly more than yours, given how seldom you post and then only
to scream and stomp your foot like the baby you are.

If so, then just
> shut the **** up. If you haven't anything intelligent or relevant to say,
> just
> shut the **** up.

It's an audio NG, when is the last time you had anything to say about audio?
You seem to have very little to sya that's relevant, must be time for you to
go. :-)

Stop taking up the time of other, more productive human
> beings, and just simply shut the **** up.
>
I'm not taking any time from anyone. People choose to read what I post or
not.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>>>>>Message-id:
. net>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better
>>>>>>>>>>> straight
>>>>>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's not particularly fat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I saw the picture, he's pretty fat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about that
>>>>>>> 2001
>>>>>>> photo?
>>>>>>> Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your
>>>>>>> agenda?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ****ing moron.
Thanks for the confession.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>>>>>>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I
>>>>>>>>wouldn't
>>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>>talking about how fat his is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being retarded.
>>>>>>>
Hard to stop being something you never have been.


>>>>>>>> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>>>>>>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people
>>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you
>>>>>>>>can
>>>>>>>>say
>>>>>>>>on a public forum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an NG
>>>>>>> asking
>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>> to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think that
>>>>>>> normal
>>>>>>> people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick,
>>>>>>> lonely,
>>>>>>> ****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>> sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick,
>>>>>>> ****ed-up
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
>>>>>>>>understand the meaning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your
>>>>>>> meaning
>>>>>>> becomes
>>>>>>> clouded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then how is it that most people don't have that trouble?
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean doing so many typos that their meaning becomes clouded? Like
>>>>> I
>>>>> said,
>>>>> you're not smart enough to be here.
>>>>>
Then stop reading what I write, and then it will be effectively the same
thing.


>>>>> Actually, I know what you're trying to say, but once again you ****ed
>>>>> up
>>>>> the
>>>>> syntax of your sentence. Case in point, moron.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
>>>>>>> are, and that's pretty amusing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The same could be said about Richman, Sackman and others.
>>>>>
>>>>> But it's more notable and predictable and repeatable with you. How's
>>>>> that
>>>>> for
>>>>> the Scientific Method?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
Weak.


>>>>>> So you do have SOME entertainment value,
>>>>>>> Mikey.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can
>>>>>>>>communicate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, moron.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Gratuitous name calling noted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Poor baby. That sounds mighty noble coming from the guy who's been
>>>>> calling me
>>>>> fat based upon a picture from when my diabetes meds were ****ing me
>>>>> up.
>>>>>

And of course you are not provacative at all.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
>>>>>>> people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Lionel gets into trouble for taking positions at odds with the facts
>>>>>>and
>>>>>>for
>>>>>>trying to make moral equivilance between Hamas and Israel, among other
>>>>>>things.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not what I'm talking about at all. Big surprise.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It's one of the reasons he gets in trouble, which is what you were
>>>>talking
>>>>about.
>>>
>>> He got in trouble because he attacked people based on things he thought
>>> they
>>> said, rather than his own political views.
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He probably could have found
>>>>>>> more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he
>>>>>>> thought
>>>>>>> he'd
>>>>>>> just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly
>>>>>>> beyond
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> understanding.
>>>>>>>
Lots of things appear to be beyond your understanding, civility for example.


>>>>>>Your level of vitriol is beyond my understanding. You appear to think
>>>>>>you
>>>>>>have some sort of extra credibility or standing here.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Appear" would be the operative word here, Mikey. It's all about your
>>>>> perception of me. Frankly, I think you're way too ****ed up in the
>>>>> head
>>>>> to
>>>>> come up with any real valid comments about me or who I am.
>>>>>
That you are nasty and crude is enough to know about you.

>>>>
>>>>Ii [sic] have to use the evidence you present, which is all pretty
>>>>nasty.
>>>
>>> Again, your illiteracy trips you up. Try again. Take your time, moron.
>>>
Typos don't reflect illiteracy.

>>>>>>
>>>>>>A check of Google shows a lot of threads by people who don't seem to
>>>>>>like
>>>>>>you very much. Are they all mistaken?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a broad question, Mikey, rife with bull****. How come you
>>>>> didn't
>>>>> provide an example? And how do these threads compare in number to the
>>>>> threads
>>>>> that have been started by people who don't like you?
>>>>
>>>>I think you win, but I'd have to check.
>>>
>>> In other words, you like making claims without checking the facts.
>>
>>I didn't make a claim.
>
> Yes, you did. You claimed that a check of Google reveals a lot of threads
> started by people who don't sem to like me very much.
>
That's more like an impression.
>>
>> Most of
>>> Arny's supporters have the same problem. Why is that?

Becuase they are objectivists and therefore the enemy of course.
>>>
>>Being deliberately misunderstood and having every word parsed to the nth
>>degree, so you can pretend not to understand? I guess that's really only
>>a
>>problem if you choose to make it so.
>
> Nice way to rationalize your borderline illiteracy. Too bad you're still
> a
> moron.
>
I guess you just like hanging with the morons.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>>>>>>Message-id:
. net>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better
>>>>>>>>>>>> straight
>>>>>>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He's not particularly fat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I saw the picture, he's pretty fat.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about that
>>>>>>>> 2001
>>>>>>>> photo?
>>>>>>>> Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your
>>>>>>>> agenda?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ****ing moron.
>Thanks for the confession.

Another IKYABWAI from McKelvy, who lacks the wit to come up with his own
insults.

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>>>>>>>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I
>>>>>>>>>wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>>>talking about how fat his is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being retarded.
>>>>>>>>
>Hard to stop being something you never have been.

Wow, what a comeback, Mikey. Exactly what we would expect from a retard.

>
>
>>>>>>>>> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>>>>>>>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few people
>>>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing you
>>>>>>>>>can
>>>>>>>>>say
>>>>>>>>>on a public forum.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an NG
>>>>>>>> asking
>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>> to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think that
>>>>>>>> normal
>>>>>>>> people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick,
>>>>>>>> lonely,
>>>>>>>> ****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>> sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick,
>>>>>>>> ****ed-up
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I can
>>>>>>>>>understand the meaning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your
>>>>>>>> meaning
>>>>>>>> becomes
>>>>>>>> clouded.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Then how is it that most people don't have that trouble?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean doing so many typos that their meaning becomes clouded? Like
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> said,
>>>>>> you're not smart enough to be here.
>>>>>>
>Then stop reading what I write, and then it will be effectively the same
>thing.

I go for months without breading what you write. The sheer volume of what you
write, however, is polluting this newsgroup.

>
>
>>>>>> Actually, I know what you're trying to say, but once again you ****ed
>>>>>> up
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> syntax of your sentence. Case in point, moron.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
>>>>>>>> are, and that's pretty amusing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The same could be said about Richman, Sackman and others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it's more notable and predictable and repeatable with you. How's
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> the Scientific Method?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>Weak.

The Scientific Method is weak? Really, do tell.

>
>
>>>>>>> So you do have SOME entertainment value,
>>>>>>>> Mikey.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can
>>>>>>>>>communicate.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, moron.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Gratuitous name calling noted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Poor baby. That sounds mighty noble coming from the guy who's been
>>>>>> calling me
>>>>>> fat based upon a picture from when my diabetes meds were ****ing me
>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>
>
>And of course you are not provacative [sic] at all.

Two wrongs make a right, eh, Mikey?

>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
>>>>>>>> people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Lionel gets into trouble for taking positions at odds with the facts
>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>for
>>>>>>>trying to make moral equivilance between Hamas and Israel, among other
>>>>>>>things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's not what I'm talking about at all. Big surprise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It's one of the reasons he gets in trouble, which is what you were
>>>>>talking
>>>>>about.
>>>>
>>>> He got in trouble because he attacked people based on things he thought
>>>> they
>>>> said, rather than his own political views.
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He probably could have found
>>>>>>>> more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he
>>>>>>>> thought
>>>>>>>> he'd
>>>>>>>> just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly
>>>>>>>> beyond
>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>> understanding.
>>>>>>>>
>Lots of things appear to be beyond your understanding, civility for example.

Not at all. I'm very civil to the people here who are not morons. Ask them.

>
>
>>>>>>>Your level of vitriol is beyond my understanding. You appear to think
>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>have some sort of extra credibility or standing here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Appear" would be the operative word here, Mikey. It's all about your
>>>>>> perception of me. Frankly, I think you're way too ****ed up in the
>>>>>> head
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> come up with any real valid comments about me or who I am.
>>>>>>
>That you are nasty and crude is enough to know about you.

What, are you speaking Yiddish now, Mikey? Nice syntax!

>
>>>>>
>>>>>Ii [sic] have to use the evidence you present, which is all pretty
>>>>>nasty.
>>>>
>>>> Again, your illiteracy trips you up. Try again. Take your time, moron.
>>>>
>Typos don't reflect illiteracy.

No, they don't. Typos coupled with poor grammar, incorrect syntax, and a
misused vocabulary, however, are.

>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A check of Google shows a lot of threads by people who don't seem to
>>>>>>>like
>>>>>>>you very much. Are they all mistaken?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a broad question, Mikey, rife with bull****. How come you
>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>> provide an example? And how do these threads compare in number to the
>>>>>> threads
>>>>>> that have been started by people who don't like you?
>>>>>
>>>>>I think you win, but I'd have to check.
>>>>
>>>> In other words, you like making claims without checking the facts.
>>>
>>>I didn't make a claim.
>>
>> Yes, you did. You claimed that a check of Google reveals a lot of threads
>> started by people who don't sem to like me very much.
>>
>That's more like an impression.

No, it's a claim.

>>>
>>> Most of
>>>> Arny's supporters have the same problem. Why is that?
>
>Becuase [sic] they are objectivists and therefore the enemy [sic] of course.

Nonsense. There are plenty of objectivists who have received decent treatment
here. You're stupid enough to believe that the group's hatred of Arny is about
audio. It's about having a lying, hypocritical, ill-mannered pedophile
infiltrating the group.

>>>>
>>>Being deliberately misunderstood and having every word parsed to the nth
>>>degree, so you can pretend not to understand? I guess that's really only
>>>a
>>>problem if you choose to make it so.
>>
>> Nice way to rationalize your borderline illiteracy. Too bad you're still
>> a
>> moron.
>>
>I guess you just like hanging with the morons.

Considering that I'm trying to get you, a moron of note, off of this group,
your statement has no relationship with reality. But no one is surprised,
Mikey.

Boon

[Michael McKelvy]

"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>Date: 12/29/2004 1:47 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: et>
>>
>>
>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>> >From: George M. Middius
>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 9:06 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>Message-id: >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>S888Wheel said to Mickey:
>>>>
>>>>> He's not particularly fat. But what if he were? How ****ed up would
>>>>> your
>>>>attack
>>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up. And to think, you feel picked on. Your
>>>>selfrighteousness
>>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>>
>>>>Try picturing Mickey with wild eyes, an unshaven face, a few missing
>>>>teeth, and an unkempt mat of greasy hair. And he's foaming at the mouth.
>>>>Now do you feel sorry for him?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah. Living out of fear and anger is really sad.
>>
>>By now you should know I don't match the above description, I certainly do
>>not live out of fear or anger.
>
> Looks that way to me. Hopefully things are different for you outside of
> RAO.
>
> I do get angry when people are as nasty and
>>vindictive as some here, but I think that's more a sign of normality,
>>since
>>more than a few newbies have commented on the same fact.
>
>
> No, it would be a sign of taking things seriously here. A mistake that can
> be
> forgiven of a newbie.
>
>
>
>
Doesn't seem so, many have commented about what a snake pit this place is,
and God help them if they say Arny gave them help.

If I were a subjectivist, democrat, I'm sure my treatment would tremendously
improved.

A causal glance at Google seems to bear this out. All one needs to do is
call Arny dirty manes and say that audio equipment can't sound the same and
poof, instant acceptance.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"S888Wheel" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>> >From: "Michael McKelvy"
>>>>>>>>>>>>Date: 12/27/2004 7:08 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>>>>>>>>>>Message-id:
. net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better
>>>>>>>>>>>>> straight
>>>>>>>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He's not particularly fat.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I saw the picture, he's pretty fat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was in that picture, yes. Did you not see my comments about
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> 2001
>>>>>>>>> photo?
>>>>>>>>> Did they go over your head? Or did they just go against your
>>>>>>>>> agenda?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ****ing moron.
>>Thanks for the confession.
>
> Another IKYABWAI from McKelvy, who lacks the wit to come up with his own
> insults.
>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But what if he were? How ****ed up would your attack
>>>>>>>>>>> be? Pretty ****ed up.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>No worse than his against me. If there weren't on my ass, I
>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>>>>talking about how fat his is.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can always lose weight. You, however, can't stop being
>>>>>>>>> retarded.
>>>>>>>>>
>>Hard to stop being something you never have been.
>
> Wow, what a comeback, Mikey. Exactly what we would expect from a retard.
>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>> And to think, you feel picked on. Your selfrighteousness
>>>>>>>>>>> is really pathetic.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I don't tell people to get of the NG, even though there a few
>>>>>>>>>>people
>>>>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>>>wouldn't mind seeing go away. It's about the most moronic thing
>>>>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>>>can
>>>>>>>>>>say
>>>>>>>>>>on a public forum.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, it isn't. If I had an overwhelming majority of people on an
>>>>>>>>> NG
>>>>>>>>> asking
>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>> to leave, I would. I think that's a normal reaction. I think
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> normal
>>>>>>>>> people don't want to be where they're not wanted. I think sick,
>>>>>>>>> lonely,
>>>>>>>>> ****ed-up stupid people stay where they're not wanted because they
>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>> sick, lonely, ****ed-up and stupid. And that's pretty sick,
>>>>>>>>> ****ed-up
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I don't harp on other people's spelling or typos. As long as I
>>>>>>>>>>can
>>>>>>>>>>understand the meaning.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> True, so do I. Unfortunately you make so many typos that your
>>>>>>>>> meaning
>>>>>>>>> becomes
>>>>>>>>> clouded.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Then how is it that most people don't have that trouble?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mean doing so many typos that their meaning becomes clouded?
>>>>>>> Like
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> said,
>>>>>>> you're not smart enough to be here.
>>>>>>>
>>Then stop reading what I write, and then it will be effectively the same
>>thing.
>
> I go for months without breading what you write. The sheer volume of what
> you
> write, however, is polluting this newsgroup.
>
>>
>>
>>>>>>> Actually, I know what you're trying to say, but once again you
>>>>>>> ****ed
>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> syntax of your sentence. Case in point, moron.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And it's very clear that the angrier you get, the more typos there
>>>>>>>>> are, and that's pretty amusing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The same could be said about Richman, Sackman and others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it's more notable and predictable and repeatable with you.
>>>>>>> How's
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> the Scientific Method?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>Weak.
>
> The Scientific Method is weak? Really, do tell.
>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>> So you do have SOME entertainment value,
>>>>>>>>> Mikey.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Even Lionel's fractured English is allowable as long as he can
>>>>>>>>>>communicate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, moron.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Gratuitous name calling noted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Poor baby. That sounds mighty noble coming from the guy who's been
>>>>>>> calling me
>>>>>>> fat based upon a picture from when my diabetes meds were ****ing me
>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>
>>
>>And of course you are not provacative [sic] at all.
>
> Two wrongs make a right, eh, Mikey?
>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lionel has gotten into arguments because he didn't understand what
>>>>>>>>> people were saying, that he interpreted it wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Lionel gets into trouble for taking positions at odds with the facts
>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>for
>>>>>>>>trying to make moral equivilance between Hamas and Israel, among
>>>>>>>>other
>>>>>>>>things.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's not what I'm talking about at all. Big surprise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's one of the reasons he gets in trouble, which is what you were
>>>>>>talking
>>>>>>about.
>>>>>
>>>>> He got in trouble because he attacked people based on things he
>>>>> thought
>>>>> they
>>>>> said, rather than his own political views.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He probably could have found
>>>>>>>>> more friends here if he didn't have that problem. Instead, he
>>>>>>>>> thought
>>>>>>>>> he'd
>>>>>>>>> just be another trolling asshole here, a conceit which is frankly
>>>>>>>>> beyond
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> understanding.
>>>>>>>>>
>>Lots of things appear to be beyond your understanding, civility for
>>example.
>
> Not at all. I'm very civil to the people here who are not morons. Ask
> them.
>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>Your level of vitriol is beyond my understanding. You appear to
>>>>>>>>think
>>>>>>>>you
>>>>>>>>have some sort of extra credibility or standing here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Appear" would be the operative word here, Mikey. It's all about
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>> perception of me. Frankly, I think you're way too ****ed up in the
>>>>>>> head
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> come up with any real valid comments about me or who I am.
>>>>>>>
>>That you are nasty and crude is enough to know about you.
>
> What, are you speaking Yiddish now, Mikey? Nice syntax!
>
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ii [sic] have to use the evidence you present, which is all pretty
>>>>>>nasty.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, your illiteracy trips you up. Try again. Take your time,
>>>>> moron.
>>>>>
>>Typos don't reflect illiteracy.
>
> No, they don't. Typos coupled with poor grammar, incorrect syntax, and a
> misused vocabulary, however, are.
>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>A check of Google shows a lot of threads by people who don't seem to
>>>>>>>>like
>>>>>>>>you very much. Are they all mistaken?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a broad question, Mikey, rife with bull****. How come you
>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>> provide an example? And how do these threads compare in number to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> threads
>>>>>>> that have been started by people who don't like you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think you win, but I'd have to check.
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words, you like making claims without checking the facts.
>>>>
>>>>I didn't make a claim.
>>>
>>> Yes, you did. You claimed that a check of Google reveals a lot of
>>> threads
>>> started by people who don't sem to like me very much.
>>>
>>That's more like an impression.
>
> No, it's a claim.
>
>>>>
>>>> Most of
>>>>> Arny's supporters have the same problem. Why is that?
>>
>>Becuase [sic] they are objectivists and therefore the enemy [sic] of
>>course.
>
> Nonsense. There are plenty of objectivists who have received decent
> treatment
> here. You're stupid enough to believe that the group's hatred of Arny is
> about
> audio. It's about having a lying, hypocritical, ill-mannered pedophile
> infiltrating the group.
>
>>>>>
>>>>Being deliberately misunderstood and having every word parsed to the nth
>>>>degree, so you can pretend not to understand? I guess that's really
>>>>only
>>>>a
>>>>problem if you choose to make it so.
>>>
>>> Nice way to rationalize your borderline illiteracy. Too bad you're
>>> still
>>> a
>>> moron.
>>>
>>I guess you just like hanging with the morons.
>
> Considering that I'm trying to get you, a moron of note, off of this
> group,
> your statement has no relationship with reality. But no one is surprised,
> Mikey.
>
No one is surprised at you either, you are predictable. Do you ever talk
about audio or do just crawl out of the woodwork when you think it's time to
pretend you are some sort of enforcer. You really are laughable.

I must see what I can do to post more.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
nk.net...
>>
>>
> Doesn't seem so, many have commented about what a snake pit this place is,
> and God help them if they say Arny gave them help.
>
> If I were a subjectivist, democrat, I'm sure my treatment would
> tremendously improved.
>
> A causal glance at Google seems to bear this out. All one needs to do is
> call Arny dirty manes and say that audio equipment can't sound the same
> and poof, instant acceptance.

"at least" some such person has a clue.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>


> I must see what I can do to post more.


Ok, but don't be repetitive. Think of some new
stupid things to say and find some new people to libel.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>>>I guess you just like hanging with the morons.
>>
>> Considering that I'm trying to get you, a moron of note, off of this
>> group,
>> your statement has no relationship with reality. But no one is surprised,
>> Mikey.
>>
>No one is surprised at you either, you are predictable.

Are you speaking for everyone, Mikey? I don't think there's a single person
here who wants a simpleton like you speaking for them.

Do you ever talk
>about audio

All the time.

or do just crawl out of the woodwork when you think it's time to
>pretend you are some sort of enforcer.

Of course not.

You really are laughable.

Gee, didn't I already say the same thing about you, Mikey. Another IKYABWAI?

>
>I must see what I can do to post more.

And spend less time with your wife and children. Excellent, Mikey. You da
man.

Boon

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> nk.net...
>>>
>>>
>> Doesn't seem so, many have commented about what a snake pit this place
>> is, and God help them if they say Arny gave them help.
>>
>> If I were a subjectivist, democrat, I'm sure my treatment would
>> tremendously improved.
>>
>> A causal glance at Google seems to bear this out. All one needs to do is
>> call Arny dirty manes and say that audio equipment can't sound the same
>> and poof, instant acceptance.
>
> "at least" some such person has a clue.
>
An opinion you get to have.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>>
>
>
>> I must see what I can do to post more.
>
>
> Ok, but don't be repetitive. Think of some new
> stupid things to say and find some new people to libel.
>
ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>>>I guess you just like hanging with the morons.
>>>
>>> Considering that I'm trying to get you, a moron of note, off of this
>>> group,
>>> your statement has no relationship with reality. But no one is
>>> surprised,
>>> Mikey.
>>>
>>No one is surprised at you either, you are predictable.
>
> Are you speaking for everyone, Mikey? I don't think there's a single
> person
> here who wants a simpleton like you speaking for them.
>
> Do you ever talk
>>about audio
>
> All the time.
>
> or do just crawl out of the woodwork when you think it's time to
>>pretend you are some sort of enforcer.
>
> Of course not.
>
> You really are laughable.
>
> Gee, didn't I already say the same thing about you, Mikey. Another
> IKYABWAI?
>
Bugs ya, huh?

Good.


>>I must see what I can do to post more.
>
> And spend less time with your wife and children. Excellent, Mikey. You
> da
> man.
>
Do your know what you do in your spare time?
They must be so proud.
Look there goes my dad, trying to bully someone off a public forum.

The last time you said something about audio was when?
The last time you weren't being snotty and vulgar was when?
1999?

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
>> ink.net...
>>>
>>
>>
>>> I must see what I can do to post more.
>>
>>
>> Ok, but don't be repetitive. Think of some new
>> stupid things to say and find some new people to libel.
>>
> ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
>

WRONG!!! You said that stupid thing many times before,
and you failed to libel someone.

[Clyde Slick]

"Michael McKelvy" > wrote in message
ink.net...
>
>>
> Bugs ya, huh?
>

We ain't got no bugs for you.

[[email protected]]

You don't want a piece of me, I will rip your ass apart. You better
warn him Ba-foon!!

[[email protected]]

Marc Phillips wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> >"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> McKelvy said:
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>Lack of self awareness noted.
> >>
> >> Not at all. You just need to do a better job of backing up your
attacks
> >> with
> >> reality.
> >>
> >> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
> >>
> >
> >I don't know about that. We allow Zakhann and Lionel to post here.
>
> Well, I don't know if Lionel's actually that stupid. He's just
stubborn enough
> to think that his poor English doesn't prevent him from looking that
stupid.
> As for Zakhann, well, he makes one stupid comment every six months
and then
> runs away when he's outwitted. Not exactly a real threat there.
>
> Boon


Happy New Years Ba-Foony.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>
>>>> Really? That's it? What a ****ing wimp you are. Leave the NG. You're
>>>> too
>>>> stupid.
>>>> Oh wait. Let me rephrase it so that you can understand: Your to
>>>> stupid.
>>>>
>>>I like it here, in spite of ****heads like you, so I won't be going
>>>anywhere.
>>
>> How can you like being in a place where everyone constantly points out how
>> stupid you are?
>
>You are not everyone. It wouldn't matter if you were.

Hey, dum-dum. I'm not speaking for everyone. I have the ability, unlike you,
of reading the posts of others directed at you and discerning how they feel
about you as a person.

>
> You don't like being here in spite of us, you like being here
>> because of us.
>
>I like the audio talk that hapens every once in awhile. You should try it.

You mean when I recently introduced a thread about the troubles I was having
with my Scott amp?

>
> You're a masochist, McKelvy. Just admit it already.
>
>You're a sadist, so it's like a yin and yang deal.

No, it's not. I'm trying to get you to leave here. That's definitely not yin
and yang.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>>> Am I supposed to care?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not if you don't mind that you are generally considerd to be a stupid
>>>> asshole.
>>>>
>>>I just consider the source.
>>
>> The source is everyone but you. Consider that.
>>
>There are approx. 40 regular posters here, the peanut gallery is you and
>about 5 others.

Name them all, and provide examples about how each one regards you as a person.
If you can be honest, and I know you can't, those numbers will change
significantly.

Boon

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>
>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Phillips has a long
>>>>>>>>>history of very vicious attacks, most of which I've let pass. Where
>>>>>>>>>was
>>>>>>>>>your condemnation of those attacks?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Show where I've viciously attacked someone without them attacking me
>>>>>>>> first.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Where was the attack against you in "Krooger In the Movies?" Did it
>>>>>>>come
>>>>>>>before or after you made a ****ty comment?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's the matter...can't you provide a URL?
>>>>>
>>>>>Just go to Google and enter your name.
>>>>
>>>> Google doesn't have the wherewithal to find the root of the argument,
>>>> especially if it began in one thread and carried over into another.
>>>> Unless you
>>>> want to look up every post I've ever written, your little search there
>>>> will be
>>>> biased toward whatever point you think you're proving.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If we're talking about Arny, then
>>>>>> it's he who attacked first by claiming I won the Aloia amplifier in a
>>>>>> suspicious way. Then he accused me of making "horrific comments about
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> death of his son," when in reality I denounced those who did so. So
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> saying, in your typical moronic way, that I should wipe the slate
>>>>>> clean
>>>>>> every
>>>>>> time a new thread is started?
>>>>>>
>>>>>I ususally do. I try to start every response in a new thread in a
>>>>>non-inflammatory way.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, but that makes no sense. If you have someone you're fighting
>>>> with,
>>>> do
>>>> you automatically forgive them when they change the subject? Besides,
>>>> that's
>>>> part of the reason why Arny is so despised, because of his habit of
>>>> storming
>>>> into threads and attacking people based upon his past history with them.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Where did Howard attack you in "Ferstler Announces Again?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Howard attacked first when he called me names for preferring the sound
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> vinyl.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Perhaps I didn't go back far enough in that particular thread.
>>>>
>>>> Ya think?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Who attacked you first in Tony Loban's "Question for George M.
>>>>>>>Middius?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tony Loban was a sockpuppet created specifically to attack those who
>>>>>> attack
>>>>>> Arny, done by a person who was playing a game by joining "the wrong
>>>>>> side."
>>>>>>
>>>>>In your opinion.
>>>>
>>>> And in the opinion of the person operating the sockpuppet, who admitted
>>>> that
>>>> was the reason.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please tell me you have better examples than this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Next time I'll spend an extra 10 minutes.
>>>>
>>>> Please do. I'm tired of your idiocy. You argue like old people ****.
>>>>
>>>Envy noted.
>>
>> What envy?
>
>The fact that old people get to **** more than you of course.

See, here's the problem. I argue with you using facts and examples of your
behavior. Your best idea is to make up **** like this. Do you know how often
old people ****? Do you know how often I ****? Have you observed every old
person in the world to see how often they ****? Of course not. You are a
moron, and you lack the intelligence to argue with me.

>
> What are you talking about?
>
>Your obvious desparation [sic] that you are powerless to make anybody do
anything.

Here we go again. Have you any proof that I am powerless to make anybody do
anything? How about my kids? My wife? I can't get them to do anything? Gee,
I just told my parents to buy a new car, and they did. As a project manager,
my job consists of getting people to do things. You are such an unbelievable
moron.
>
> Have you given up?
>
>No, of course not. Why would I give up? This is as much my NG as
>anybody's, possibly more than yours, given how seldom you post and then only
>to scream and stomp your foot like the baby you are.

I meant "have you given up arguing with me," since your responses are tedious,
feeble, and reek of defeat. Too bad you're such a last-word freak. I'm
playing you like a fool every time you respond to me. You're too ****ing
stupid to see it. And that's the fun.

>
> If so, then just
>> shut the **** up. If you haven't anything intelligent or relevant to say,
>> just
>> shut the **** up.
>
>It's an audio NG, when is the last time you had anything to say about audio?
>You seem to have very little to sya that's relevant, must be time for you to
>go. :-)

Like I said, I just started a rather lengthy thread about tube amps. Again we
have reality on my side, and fantasy on yours. Are you starting to understand
how stupid you look? Or are you too stupid to know how stupid you look? Which
is it, Mikey?

>
> Stop taking up the time of other, more productive human
>> beings, and just simply shut the **** up.
>>
>I'm not taking any time from anyone. People choose to read what I post or
>not.

Unfortunately, people like to pick on you because you're so unbelievably
stupid. I think too much time on RAO is wasted on putting you in your place,
especially since you don't know where your place is. (Hint: it's not here,
moron.)

Boon

[Michael McKelvy]

"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
> McKelvy said:
>
>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>> McKelvy said:
>>>
>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>> McKelvy said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh, and leave this NG. You are too stupid to be here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Leave the table, you're to [sic] fat to be there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't ask for a better straight
>>>>>>> man.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Go look in the mirror, I couldn't ask for a better fat man.
>>>>>
>>>>> Really? That's it? What a ****ing wimp you are. Leave the NG.
>>>>> You're
>>>>> too
>>>>> stupid.
>>>>> Oh wait. Let me rephrase it so that you can understand: Your to
>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>I like it here, in spite of ****heads like you, so I won't be going
>>>>anywhere.
>>>
>>> How can you like being in a place where everyone constantly points out
>>> how
>>> stupid you are?
>>
>>You are not everyone. It wouldn't matter if you were.
>
> Hey, dum-dum. I'm not speaking for everyone. I have the ability, unlike
> you,
> of reading the posts of others directed at you and discerning how they
> feel
> about you as a person.
>
>>
>> You don't like being here in spite of us, you like being here
>>> because of us.
>>
>>I like the audio talk that hapens every once in awhile. You should try
>>it.
>
> You mean when I recently introduced a thread about the troubles I was
> having
> with my Scott amp?
>
>>
>> You're a masochist, McKelvy. Just admit it already.
>>
>>You're a sadist, so it's like a yin and yang deal.
>
> No, it's not. I'm trying to get you to leave here. That's definitely not
> yin
> and yang.
>
Then just get on with your life and stop wasting time on me. I'm not
leaving.

[Marc Phillips]

McKelvy said:

>
>"Marc Phillips" > wrote in message
...
>> McKelvy said:
>>
>>>>>I guess you just like hanging with the morons.
>>>>
>>>> Considering that I'm trying to get you, a moron of note, off of this
>>>> group,
>>>> your statement has no relationship with reality. But no one is
>>>> surprised,
>>>> Mikey.
>>>>
>>>No one is surprised at you either, you are predictable.
>>
>> Are you speaking for everyone, Mikey? I don't think there's a single
>> person
>> here who wants a simpleton like you speaking for them.
>>
>> Do you ever talk
>>>about audio
>>
>> All the time.
>>
>> or do just crawl out of the woodwork when you think it's time to
>>>pretend you are some sort of enforcer.
>>
>> Of course not.
>>
>> You really are laughable.
>>
>> Gee, didn't I already say the same thing about you, Mikey. Another
>> IKYABWAI?
>>
>Bugs ya, huh?

That you aren't smart enough to come up with original insults, that you have to
steal them directly from the person you're arguing with? Yes, it bugs me that
I don't have smarter people to argue with.

>
>Good.

Setting your standards kind of low, aren't you.

>
>
>>>I must see what I can do to post more.
>>
>> And spend less time with your wife and children. Excellent, Mikey. You
>> da
>> man.
>>
>Do your [sic] know what you do in your spare time?
>They must be so proud.
>Look there goes my dad, trying to bully someone off a public forum.

Yeah, that's what they're thinking. Try sticking to Planet Earth. Oh, and my
wife thinks you're a moron, too.
>
>The last time you said something about audio was when?
>The last time you weren't being snotty and vulgar was when?
>1999?

Uh, let's take another look at the real world, Mikey. I regularly post to two
other audio forums, both moderated. I don't engage in flames, and I've never
had a post rejected. I also have a bi-monthly column in a webzine about audio,
and I'm busy writing my 50th article for them. If you want to measure reality
by what happens in RAO, then you're a bigger moron than I thought, and I
thought you were already a huge ****ing moron.

Boon