Re: Good Reason to Hate France

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>
> At which time ?

when he emulates you and joins Hamas.

[Lionel]

Clyde Slick wrote:
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>At which time ?
>
>
> when he emulates you and joins Hamas.

Still have problem with history, eh idiot ?
Still make the confusion between Noriega and Salvatore Allende ?

I am non surprised that you need to reinvent the history since you never
study it.

[Lionel]

> You aren't trying to refute facts, only conclusions on motivation.
> Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring Frances
> financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous.

Ooops, what you use to write is most of the time so predictable that I
have missed the real content of your post.
I *sincerely* fully agree with you when you write :
"Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring France's
financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous"

We aren't participating to a moral contest on a national level here. And
I fully agree with you when you say that *France* has a lot of reasons
to be criticized for its doubtful political alliances, notably with USA
first or with Saddam and/or with some former colonial African
"republics".. :-(
In the end I would like to say you that I spit on US democracy when it
is supported by *******s and sons of bitch like you or George W. Bush as
much as I spit on french democracy when it is supported by sons of bitch
like you or the french version of George W. Bush.

Is it clear now ? ;-)

[ScottW]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>> You aren't trying to refute facts, only conclusions on motivation.
>> Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring Frances
>> financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous.
>
> Ooops, what you use to write is most of the time so predictable that I
> have missed the real content of your post.
> I *sincerely* fully agree with you when you write :
> "Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring France's
> financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous"
>
> We aren't participating to a moral contest on a national level here. And I
> fully agree with you when you say that *France* has a lot of reasons to be
> criticized for its doubtful political alliances, notably with USA first or
> with Saddam and/or with some former colonial African "republics".. :-(
> In the end I would like to say you that I spit on US democracy when it is
> supported by *******s and sons of bitch like you or George W. Bush as much
> as I spit on french democracy when it is supported by sons of bitch like
> you or the french version of George W. Bush.
>
> Is it clear now ? ;-)

Yes, your destiny is clear. Your fully prepared to answer the call to
prayer on Friday.

ScottW

[Lionel]

ScottW wrote:
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>> You aren't trying to refute facts, only conclusions on motivation.
>>>Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring Frances
>>>financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous.
>>
>>Ooops, what you use to write is most of the time so predictable that I
>>have missed the real content of your post.
>>I *sincerely* fully agree with you when you write :
>>"Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring France's
>> financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous"
>>
>>We aren't participating to a moral contest on a national level here. And I
>>fully agree with you when you say that *France* has a lot of reasons to be
>>criticized for its doubtful political alliances, notably with USA first or
>>with Saddam and/or with some former colonial African "republics".. :-(
>>In the end I would like to say you that I spit on US democracy when it is
>>supported by *******s and sons of bitch like you or George W. Bush as much
>>as I spit on french democracy when it is supported by sons of bitch like
>>you or the french version of George W. Bush.
>>
>>Is it clear now ? ;-)
>
>
> Yes, your destiny is clear. Your fully prepared to answer the call to
> prayer on Friday.

Would you mean that it is any shame to do that ?
Can you elaborate a little bit on this point ?

>
> ScottW
>
>

[Clyde Slick]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> ScottW wrote:

> >
> >
> > Yes, your destiny is clear. Your fully prepared to answer the call to
> > prayer on Friday.
>
> Would you mean that it is any shame to do that ?
> Can you elaborate a little bit on this point ?

You will sson be living in the Islamist "Republic" (haha)
of France.

[ScottW]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
> ScottW wrote:
>> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>> You aren't trying to refute facts, only conclusions on motivation.
>>>> Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring Frances
>>>>financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous.
>>>
>>>Ooops, what you use to write is most of the time so predictable that I
>>>have missed the real content of your post.
>>>I *sincerely* fully agree with you when you write :
>>>"Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring France's
>>> financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous"
>>>
>>>We aren't participating to a moral contest on a national level here. And
>>>I fully agree with you when you say that *France* has a lot of reasons to
>>>be criticized for its doubtful political alliances, notably with USA
>>>first or with Saddam and/or with some former colonial African
>>>"republics".. :-(
>>>In the end I would like to say you that I spit on US democracy when it is
>>>supported by *******s and sons of bitch like you or George W. Bush as
>>>much as I spit on french democracy when it is supported by sons of bitch
>>>like you or the french version of George W. Bush.
>>>
>>>Is it clear now ? ;-)
>>
>>
>> Yes, your destiny is clear. Your fully prepared to answer the call to
>> prayer on Friday.
>
> Would you mean that it is any shame to do that ?

Only if you do it because you have to.

> Can you elaborate a little bit on this point ?

No, its clear enough.

ScottW

[Michael McKelvy]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>> You aren't trying to refute facts, only conclusions on motivation.
>> Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring Frances
>> financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous.
>
> Ooops, what you use to write is most of the time so predictable that I
> have missed the real content of your post.
> I *sincerely* fully agree with you when you write :
> "Attributing some superior morality to France while ignoring France's
> financial dealings with Saddam is pretty ridiculous"
>
> We aren't participating to a moral contest on a national level here. And I
> fully agree with you when you say that *France* has a lot of reasons to be
> criticized for its doubtful political alliances, notably with USA first or
> with Saddam and/or with some former colonial African "republics".. :-(
> In the end I would like to say you that I spit on US democracy when it is
> supported by *******s and sons of bitch like you or George W. Bush as much
> as I spit on french democracy when it is supported by sons of bitch like
> you or the french version of George W. Bush.
>
> Is it clear now ? ;-)

It is clear that you are insane.

[Robert Morein]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Ze yapping, she cross all ze borders.
>
> > For recklessly selling nuclear technology to rogue states.
>
> My god, how horrible. Did they also sell poison gas? How about poison
> gas that was actually used against civilians in a civil war?
>
> I'll bet they also sold conventional weapons to some countries knowing
> full well that said countries would use them against a neighboring
> country, with whom, as it might happen, the arms-selling country had a
> major beef but was not willing to prosecute a war of their own. Can you
> imagine?
>
Thank God we live in a God-fearing country where that would never happen.
Amen, Brother.
wait a minute...you talkin 'bout us?