Log in

View Full Version : Ferstler on Liberty


Howard Ferstler
September 13th 04, 11:52 PM
The following is a draft of an article I published a while back in the
Federal Register. What follows comes from my contacts with quite a large
number of famous dead people. I also posted this article in response to a
comment in another thread:

Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a
new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all
men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any
nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great
battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it as a final
resting place for those who died here that the nation might live. This we
may, in all propriety do. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we
cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and
dead who struggled here have hallowed it far above our poor power to add or
detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but
it can never forget what they did here.

It is rather for us the living, we here be dedicated to the great task
remaining before us--that from these honored dead we take increased devotion
to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of
devotion--that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in
vain, that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom, and that
government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish
from the earth."

Clyde Slick
September 14th 04, 01:52 AM
"Howard Ferstler" <not for you> wrote in message
...
> The following is a draft of an article I published a while back in the
> Federal Register. What follows comes from my contacts with quite a large
> number of famous dead people. I also posted this article in response to a
> comment in another thread:
>
> Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers at least brought forth on this
continent a
> new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all
> men are created equal.
> Now, Clyde, we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that
nation or any
> nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a
great
> battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it as a
final
> resting place for those who died here that the nation might live. At least
this we
> may, in all propriety do. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we
> cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and
> dead who struggled here have hallowed it far above our poor power to add
or
> detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here,
but
> it can never forget what they did here, Slick.
>
> It is rather for us the living, we here be dedicated to the great task
> remaining before us, Biff,--that from these honored dead we take increased
devotion
> to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of
> devotion--that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died
in
> vain, that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom, and that
> at least government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not
perish
> from the earth."
>

Carl Valle
September 23rd 04, 11:30 PM
"Howard Ferstler" <not for you> wrote in message
...
..
What follows comes from my contacts with quite a large
> number of famous dead people.
-


Hey - What do YOU mean you PUBLISHED that?
Didn't you steal that from Lincoln?

Dont you mean you PLAGARIZED that?

CARL

Bruce J. Richman
September 24th 04, 05:19 AM
Carl Valle wrote:


>"Howard Ferstler" <not for you> wrote in message
...
>.
>What follows comes from my contacts with quite a large
>> number of famous dead people.
>-
>
>
>Hey - What do YOU mean you PUBLISHED that?
>Didn't you steal that from Lincoln?
>
>Dont you mean you PLAGARIZED that?
>
>CARL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

So now we know where Ferstler gets his information - from seances, crystal
balls and mediums.

How many times has he "crossed over" to the other side? One of these days he
may do us all a favor and not come back.


Bruce J. Richman

Howard Ferstler
October 5th 04, 02:45 AM
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote:

> How many times has he "crossed over" to the other side? One of these days he
> may do us all a favor and not come back.
>
> Bruce J. Richman

Does my being here make you uncomfortable, Richman? Do my
opinions about audio cause you to be insecure and sometimes
even unsettled?

Do you sometimes look at your expensive amp and mutter to
yourself "What if he is correct?"

Howard Ferstler

Bruce J. Richman
October 5th 04, 07:27 AM
Howard Ferstler wrote:


>"Bruce J. Richman" wrote:
>
>> How many times has he "crossed over" to the other side? One of these days
>he
>> may do us all a favor and not come back.
>>
>> Bruce J. Richman
>
>Does my being here make you uncomfortable, Richman? Do my
>opinions about audio cause you to be insecure and sometimes
>even unsettled?
>

Your opinions, Ferstler, are simply the result of your delusional status and
chronic inability to tell the truth about things. You are simply a source of
ridicule and contempt, nothing more. Your pathetic attempts at mind reading
are just another example of your lack of touch with reality.


>Do you sometimes look at your expensive amp and mutter to
>yourself "What if he is correct?"
>

Nothing you have ever said has caused even the slightest doubt in my mind that
you're full of it. And since you have no idea what I paid for my amplifier,
your speculations are about as worthless as your libelous comments about
others.

Why don't you try telling the truth for a change, Ferstler? Or are you too
cowardly and afraid to admit you've made severe mistakes and lied deliberately
about others?






>Howard Ferstler
>
>
>
>
>
>


Bruce J. Richman

Howard Ferstler
October 6th 04, 01:22 AM
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote:
>
> Howard Ferstler wrote:
>
> >"Bruce J. Richman" wrote:
> >
> >> How many times has he "crossed over" to the other side? One of these days
> >he
> >> may do us all a favor and not come back.

> >Does my being here make you uncomfortable, Richman? Do my
> >opinions about audio cause you to be insecure and sometimes
> >even unsettled?

> Your opinions, Ferstler, are simply the result of your delusional status and
> chronic inability to tell the truth about things. You are simply a source of
> ridicule and contempt, nothing more.

On RAO, I consider this as a badge of honor.

> >Do you sometimes look at your expensive amp and mutter to
> >yourself "What if he is correct?"

> Nothing you have ever said has caused even the slightest doubt in my mind that
> you're full of it. And since you have no idea what I paid for my amplifier,
> your speculations are about as worthless as your libelous comments about
> others.

Still, don't you get an occasional twinge of doubt when you
listen to that amp and wonder if a $500 Pioneer receiver
might be able to sound just as good. Oops, perhaps, because
it has a center channel and surround sound, it might even
sound better. Do such issues ever haunt you, Bruce?

> Why don't you try telling the truth for a change, Ferstler? Or are you too
> cowardly and afraid to admit you've made severe mistakes and lied deliberately
> about others?

Get a life, psychologist.

Howard Ferstler

Bruce J. Richman
October 6th 04, 06:52 AM
Howard Ferstler wrote:


>"Bruce J. Richman" wrote:
>>
>> Howard Ferstler wrote:
>>
>> >"Bruce J. Richman" wrote:
>> >
>> >> How many times has he "crossed over" to the other side? One of these
>days
>> >he
>> >> may do us all a favor and not come back.
>
>> >Does my being here make you uncomfortable, Richman? Do my
>> >opinions about audio cause you to be insecure and sometimes
>> >even unsettled?
>
>> Your opinions, Ferstler, are simply the result of your delusional status
>and
>> chronic inability to tell the truth about things. You are simply a source
>of
>> ridicule and contempt, nothing more.
>
>On RAO, I consider this as a badge of honor.
>

Masochism and rationalization noted. Unfortunately, both are defense
mechanisms, so nobody believes you.



>> >Do you sometimes look at your expensive amp and mutter to
>> >yourself "What if he is correct?"
>
>> Nothing you have ever said has caused even the slightest doubt in my mind
>that
>> you're full of it. And since you have no idea what I paid for my
>amplifier,
>> your speculations are about as worthless as your libelous comments about
>> others.
>
>Still, don't you get an occasional twinge of doubt when you
>listen to that amp and wonder if a $500 Pioneer receiver
>might be able to sound just as good. Oops, perhaps, because
>it has a center channel and surround sound, it might even
>sound better. Do such issues ever haunt you, Bruce?
>

Your delusions are strictly your own. When was the last time you were in
contact with reality, Howard?


>> Why don't you try telling the truth for a change, Ferstler? Or are you too
>> cowardly and afraid to admit you've made severe mistakes and lied
>deliberately
>> about others?
>
>Get a life, psychologist.
>

Tell the truth, libeler.





>Howard Ferstler
>
>
>
>
>
>


Bruce J. Richman

Howard Ferstler
October 11th 04, 05:34 PM
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote:
>
> Howard Ferstler wrote:

> >> >Do you sometimes look at your expensive amp and mutter to
> >> >yourself "What if he is correct?"

> >> Nothing you have ever said has caused even the slightest doubt in my mind
> >that
> >> you're full of it. And since you have no idea what I paid for my
> >amplifier,
> >> your speculations are about as worthless as your libelous comments about
> >> others.

> >Still, don't you get an occasional twinge of doubt when you
> >listen to that amp and wonder if a $500 Pioneer receiver
> >might be able to sound just as good. Oops, perhaps, because
> >it has a center channel and surround sound, it might even
> >sound better. Do such issues ever haunt you, Bruce?

> Your delusions are strictly your own. When was the last time you were in
> contact with reality, Howard?

FIRST POINT. You know, if I am WRONG about amp sound then
those who have spent big bucks on amps may be able to
justify the cash outlay. I mean, they will have spent a LOT
of money to get a very, very slight improvement in sound
reproduction that probably would go unnoticed during
typical, music-oriented listening. Only during the most
rigorous AB comparison could such differences be notice.

On the other hand, the neighbor down the block who purchased
the cheaper amp will still not have to feel bad, because for
a fraction of the cash outlay they will get 99.9% of the
performance.

SECOND POINT. However, if I am CORRECT about amp sound then
those who have spent big bucks on amps will just have to
feel like idiots. I mean, they will be not getting any
better performance than the guy down the block who purchased
a Pioneer, Yamaha, Onkyo, Denon, etc. receiver.

And that person who purchased the cheaper gear will now be
able to feel better than ever, because not only did he save
big bucks on his amp purchase and get two-channel sound as
good as his big-spending neighbor down the street, but he
will also get a tuner and surround sound thrown in for free.

Howard Ferstler

Bruce J. Richman
October 11th 04, 05:48 PM
Howard Ferstler wrote:


>"Bruce J. Richman" wrote:
>>
>> Howard Ferstler wrote:
>
>> >> >Do you sometimes look at your expensive amp and mutter to
>> >> >yourself "What if he is correct?"
>
>> >> Nothing you have ever said has caused even the slightest doubt in my
>mind
>> >that
>> >> you're full of it. And since you have no idea what I paid for my
>> >amplifier,
>> >> your speculations are about as worthless as your libelous comments about
>> >> others.
>
>> >Still, don't you get an occasional twinge of doubt when you
>> >listen to that amp and wonder if a $500 Pioneer receiver
>> >might be able to sound just as good. Oops, perhaps, because
>> >it has a center channel and surround sound, it might even
>> >sound better. Do such issues ever haunt you, Bruce?
>
>> Your delusions are strictly your own. When was the last time you were in
>> contact with reality, Howard?
>
>FIRST POINT. You know, if I am WRONG about amp sound then
>those who have spent big bucks on amps may be able to
>justify the cash outlay. I mean, they will have spent a LOT
>of money to get a very, very slight improvement in sound
>reproduction that probably would go unnoticed during
>typical, music-oriented listening. Only during the most
>rigorous AB comparison could such differences be notice.
>
>On the other hand, the neighbor down the block who purchased
>the cheaper amp will still not have to feel bad, because for
>a fraction of the cash outlay they will get 99.9% of the
>performance.
>
>SECOND POINT. However, if I am CORRECT about amp sound then
>those who have spent big bucks on amps will just have to
>feel like idiots. I mean, they will be not getting any
>better performance than the guy down the block who purchased
>a Pioneer, Yamaha, Onkyo, Denon, etc. receiver.
>
>And that person who purchased the cheaper gear will now be
>able to feel better than ever, because not only did he save
>big bucks on his amp purchase and get two-channel sound as
>good as his big-spending neighbor down the street, but he
>will also get a tuner and surround sound thrown in for free.
>
>Howard Ferstler
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

All of this is irrelevant and non-responsive to what I've said. Since you have
no idea of what anybody has actually paid for their equipment, including me,
claims about people having overpaid are simply not credible.


Bruce J. Richman