View Full Version : Re: REVIIEW: Schoeps miniCMIT short shotgun
Ty Ford[_2_]
January 13th 18, 05:40 PM
But you'll notice that if you use them indoors, the reverb cancellation is
> nearly as good as the Schoeps hypercardioid, and way better than that of
> a traditional shotgun.... because behind that little interference tube -IS-
> a Schoeps hypercardioid.
Hey Scott,
The interference tube of the miniCMIT is the same length as the interference tube on the CMIT and the SuperCMIT.
Regards,
Ty Ford
Scott Dorsey
January 13th 18, 07:29 PM
Ty Ford > wrote:
> But you'll notice that if you use them indoors, the reverb cancellation is
>> nearly as good as the Schoeps hypercardioid, and way better than that of
>> a traditional shotgun.... because behind that little interference tube -IS-
>> a Schoeps hypercardioid.
>
>Hey Scott,
>
>The interference tube of the miniCMIT is the same length as the interference tube on the CMIT and the SuperCMIT.
It sure is! NONE of them are classic shotguns!
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Ty Ford[_2_]
January 14th 18, 04:53 PM
> It sure is! NONE of them are classic shotguns!
> --scott
I may be wrong, but it sounds like you have a problem with them because they are not classic. The Sanken CS3e is also not classic shotgun, but people have found good uses for it as well.
Me, I have an issue with the term "reach." I don't think shotguns actually provide useful reach.
Regards,
Ty Ford
Scott Dorsey
January 14th 18, 06:41 PM
In article >,
Ty Ford > wrote:
>> It sure is! NONE of them are classic shotguns!
>
>I may be wrong, but it sounds like you have a problem with them because they are not classic. The Sanken CS3e is also not classic shotgun, but people have found good uses for it as well.
I have a problem with the marketing. It's not really a shotgun. It's
a lot more useful than a real shotgun is. So don't call it a shotgun,
Schoeps should call it something else.
For years Dr. Schoeps swore he'd never sell a shotgun... and as soon as
he died they came out with the CMIT... which as I said, isn't exactly
a shotgun.
>Me, I have an issue with the term "reach." I don't think shotguns actually provide useful reach.
I agree the term "reach" is illusionary. Shotguns employ a trick that
eliminates noise from discrete sources above a certain corner frequency.
For the CMIT, that corner frequency is somewhere in the middle of the
vocal range, meaning that for much of the vocal range it's not acting
as a shotgun at all.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.