Re: multitracks for mixing practice

[JackA]

On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 1:58:37 PM UTC-5, Peter Larsen wrote:
> http://www.cambridge-mt.com/ms-mtk.htm

We (r.a.p.) should have a mixing competition!!!

How about it, Peter, up to the challenge!!??

Jack

[Peter Larsen[_3_]]

On 17-12-2015 16:48, JackA wrote:

> On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 1:58:37 PM UTC-5, Peter Larsen wrote:
>> http://www.cambridge-mt.com/ms-mtk.htm

> We (r.a.p.) should have a mixing competition!!!

> How about it, Peter, up to the challenge!!??

I'll keep it in mind, but first a bit of cpu tinkering and perhaps
getting a new DAW ready to have my Sony audio and music software
installed on. Nothing promised ...

> Jack

- Peter Larsen

[JackA]

On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 12:06:59 PM UTC-5, Peter Larsen wrote:
> On 17-12-2015 16:48, JackA wrote:
>
> > On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 1:58:37 PM UTC-5, Peter Larsen wrote:
> >> http://www.cambridge-mt.com/ms-mtk.htm
>
> > We (r.a.p.) should have a mixing competition!!!
>
> > How about it, Peter, up to the challenge!!??
>
> I'll keep it in mind, but first a bit of cpu tinkering and perhaps
> getting a new DAW ready to have my Sony audio and music software
> installed on. Nothing promised ...

Okay, not isolating you, just thought it'd be hear how other people would mix/enhance.

Thanks!

Jack
>
> > Jack
>
> - Peter Larsen

[geoff]

On 18/12/2015 6:07 a.m., Peter Larsen wrote:
>
> I'll keep it in mind, but first a bit of cpu tinkering and perhaps
> getting a new DAW ready to have my Sony audio and music software
> installed on. Nothing promised ...
>
>> Jack '3k' Ass
>
> - Peter Larsen
>
>

Vegas, Sound Forge, and Acid ?

Vegas remains my 'go-to' for straightforward audio recording and mixing.

geoff

[JackA]

On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 3:36:20 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
> On 18/12/2015 6:07 a.m., Peter Larsen wrote:
> >
> > I'll keep it in mind, but first a bit of cpu tinkering and perhaps
> > getting a new DAW ready to have my Sony audio and music software
> > installed on. Nothing promised ...
> >
> >> Jack '3k' Ass
> >
> > - Peter Larsen
> >
> >
>
> Vegas, Sound Forge, and Acid ?
>
> Vegas remains my 'go-to' for straightforward audio recording and mixing.

Sony Stuff? No thanks!!!

Jack

>
> geoff

[JackA]

On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 3:36:20 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
> On 18/12/2015 6:07 a.m., Peter Larsen wrote:
> >
> > I'll keep it in mind, but first a bit of cpu tinkering and perhaps
> > getting a new DAW ready to have my Sony audio and music software
> > installed on. Nothing promised ...
> >
> >> Jack '3k' Ass
> >
> > - Peter Larsen
> >
> >
>
> Vegas, Sound Forge, and Acid ?
>
> Vegas remains my 'go-to' for straightforward audio recording and mixing.
>
> geoff

Vegas didn't have anything better to offer, so they went for 64 bit. Sorry, Sony people are idiots. (Once) great electronics though!

Jack

[Peter Larsen[_3_]]

On 17-12-2015 21:36, geoff wrote:

> On 18/12/2015 6:07 a.m., Peter Larsen wrote:

>> I'll keep it in mind, but first a bit of cpu tinkering and perhaps
>> getting a new DAW ready to have my Sony audio and music software
>> installed on. Nothing promised ...

>> - Peter Larsen

> Vegas, Sound Forge, and Acid ?

Sony Movie Editor, Sound Forge and Acid. I have been riding the upgrade
train since someone, perhaps here, told me of a crossgrade-offer for
Acid. I never really did get to use it, but it paved the way and I plain
like Audition3 very much, except that it is not easy to export presets
from it, Cool Edit got something very right as it was at least possible
without using a registry editor, which is what appears to be relevant
for the later Adobe incarnations.

> Vegas remains my 'go-to' for straightforward audio recording and mixing.

Sony Movie Editor, or whatever they call it, is the "lite version". It
fits my brain and is nice to work in. I got a USD 99 upgrade offer to
Magix Movies because I have a couple of old versions, and went for it,
not to edit in it, I plain do not like it, but for the effects,
including the stabilizer it has and notably its gamma correction
plug-in. And yes, it is my intention to go for the full Vegas.

> geoff

Kind regards

Peter Larsen

[Peter Larsen[_3_]]

On 17-12-2015 18:49, JackA wrote:

> On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 12:06:59 PM UTC-5, Peter Larsen wrote:

>> On 17-12-2015 16:48, JackA wrote:

>>> On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 1:58:37 PM UTC-5, Peter Larsen wrote:
>>>> http://www.cambridge-mt.com/ms-mtk.htm

>>> We (r.a.p.) should have a mixing competition!!!

>>> How about it, Peter, up to the challenge!!??

>> I'll keep it in mind, but first a bit of cpu tinkering and perhaps
>> getting a new DAW ready to have my Sony audio and music software
>> installed on. Nothing promised ...

> Okay, not isolating you, just thought it'd be hear how other people would mix/enhance.

No problem, my interest in that link has a lot to do with making mix
examples now that the Raw Tracks site almost isn't there anymore.

- Peter Larsen

> Thanks!
>
> Jack
>>
>>> Jack
>>
>> - Peter Larsen
>

[Nil[_2_]]

On 17 Dec 2015, Peter Larsen > wrote in
rec.audio.pro:

> Sony Movie Editor, Sound Forge and Acid. I have been riding the
> upgrade train since someone, perhaps here, told me of a
> crossgrade-offer for Acid. I never really did get to use it, but
> it paved the way and I plain like Audition3 very much, except that
> it is not easy to export presets from it, Cool Edit got something
> very right as it was at least possible without using a registry
> editor, which is what appears to be relevant for the later Adobe
> incarnations.

Audition 3's effects presets are contained in a file called
"effect_settings.xml". It's a plain text file and the presets can be
carefully copied from there and pasted into the appropriate section of
Audition 2's "Audition.ini". I don't think any of the presets are
stored in the registry.

[Peter Larsen[_3_]]

On 18-12-2015 06:58, Nil wrote:

> On 17 Dec 2015, Peter Larsen > wrote in
> rec.audio.pro:

>> Sony Movie Editor, Sound Forge and Acid. I have been riding the
>> upgrade train since someone, perhaps here, told me of a
>> crossgrade-offer for Acid. I never really did get to use it, but
>> it paved the way and I plain like Audition3 very much, except that
>> it is not easy to export presets from it, Cool Edit got something
>> very right as it was at least possible without using a registry
>> editor, which is what appears to be relevant for the later Adobe
>> incarnations.

> Audition 3's effects presets are contained in a file called
> "effect_settings.xml". It's a plain text file and the presets can be
> carefully copied from there and pasted into the appropriate section of
> Audition 2's "Audition.ini". I don't think any of the presets are
> stored in the registry.

Thank you so very much!

Kind regards

Peter Larsen