Psycho Monkey!!!

[[email protected]]

Heavy-handed moderator who does't like loudness talk, deletes threads at will and moves threads around.

[None]

<kooky krissie @gmail.com> wrote in message
...
> Heavy-handed moderator who does't like loudness talk, deletes
> threads at will and moves threads around.

Poor baby. You crap all over his moderated forum, annoying everyone in
sight, and you get censored. That's why you come back here to whine
about it. You're just too stupid for any moderated forum. You can't
control your compulsion to ride the festering corpse of the hobby
horse you flogged to death.

[hank alrich]

None > wrote:

> <kooky krissie @gmail.com> wrote in message
> ...
> > Heavy-handed moderator who does't like loudness talk, deletes
> > threads at will and moves threads around.
>
> Poor baby. You crap all over his moderated forum, annoying everyone in
> sight, and you get censored. That's why you come back here to whine
> about it. You're just too stupid for any moderated forum. You can't
> control your compulsion to ride the festering corpse of the hobby
> horse you flogged to death.

Rigor Mortis rules.

--
shut up and play your guitar * HankAlrich.Com
HankandShaidriMusic.Com
YouTube.Com/WalkinayMusic

[geoff]

On 28/10/2014 9:42 a.m., wrote:
> Heavy-handed moderator who does't like loudness talk, deletes threads at will and moves threads around.
>


WTF are you on about now ? This is a USENET newsgroup and there *is* no
moderator. Which is why all your posts get through ;-(

geoff

[[email protected]]

geoff: Read my o.p.: The words in CAPS hint at what audio forums I'm referring to. No loudness war talk allowed.

[John Williamson]

On 28/10/2014 13:20, wrote:
> geoff: Read my o.p.: The words in CAPS hint at what audio forums I'm referring to. No loudness war talk allowed.
>
Or, to put it another way, they're p155ed off with you yammering on
about something you know nothing about.

--
Tciao for Now!

John.

[[email protected]]

John Williamson wrote: ">
Or, to put it another way, they're p155ed off with you yammering on
about something you know nothing about.

--
Tciao for Now!

John. "

Who the F are YOU to presume what I know nothing about?! Anyone with half a brain can figure out what "loudness war" means in musical terms and can learn and understand how it came about.

Seems like the half of your brain that doesn't know what I know doesn't even EXIST.

"Tciao THIS for now"!

[Scott Dorsey]

> wrote:
>
>Who the F are YOU to presume what I know nothing about?! Anyone with half a brain can figure out what "loudness war" means in musical terms and can learn and understand how it came about.

He's an engineer who knows about audio, which is something you're not.

You have no clue about either the social background or the physics behind
the loudness wars, as witnessed by your continually coming in here with
articles about reference levels (which have absolutely nothing to do with
compression or the loudness wars). This has become clear.

>Seems like the half of your brain that doesn't know what I know doesn't even EXIST.

A lot of what you seem to think you know doesn't exist, and as a consequence
those of us who are really concerned about loudness issues do not appreciate
your ill-informed yammering which makes all of us look bad.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

[[email protected]]

Scott Dorsey wrote: "He's an engineer who knows about audio, which is something you're not.

You have no clue about either the social background or the physics behind
the loudness wars, as witnessed by your continually coming in here with
articles about reference levels (which have absolutely nothing to do with
compression or the loudness wars). This has become clear. "


What I do know: Dynamic range compression lowers the level of the loudest parts of a piece of audio. You can then apply gain to the remaining, quieter audio to take advantage of the headroom achieved via the prior dynamics processing.

My cats could get that.

[William Sommerwerck]

wrote in message ...

> What I do know: Dynamic range compression lowers the level of
> the loudest parts of a piece of audio. You can then apply gain to
> the remaining, quieter audio to take advantage of the headroom
> achieved via the prior dynamics processing.

That's not a correct way of explaining it.

[hank alrich]

geoff > wrote:

> WTF are you on about now ? This is a USENET newsgroup and there *is* no
> moderator. Which is why all your posts get through ;-(

Here they only show up in the quotes of replies.

--
shut up and play your guitar * HankAlrich.Com
HankandShaidriMusic.Com
YouTube.Com/WalkinayMusic

[hank alrich]

Scott Dorsey > wrote:

> He's an engineer who knows about audio, which is something you're not.
>
> You have no clue about either the social background or the physics behind
> the loudness wars, as witnessed by your continually coming in here with
> articles about reference levels (which have absolutely nothing to do with
> compression or the loudness wars). This has become clear.
>
> >Seems like the half of your brain that doesn't know what I know doesn't
> > even EXIST.
>
> A lot of what you seem to think you know doesn't exist, and as a consequence
> those of us who are really concerned about loudness issues do not appreciate
> your ill-informed yammering which makes all of us look bad.
> --scott

On the Internet it might be difficult to realize we're corresponding
with a dog, but it's pretty easy to spot who is merely full of ****.

BTW, Scott, in all these years of reading your stuff, that's one of your
finest responses ever.

--
shut up and play your guitar * HankAlrich.Com
HankandShaidriMusic.Com
YouTube.Com/WalkinayMusic

[John Williamson]

On 28/10/2014 14:34, wrote:

You seem to have lost your temper for some reason.

> Who the F are YOU to presume what I know nothing about?! Anyone with half a brain can figure out what "loudness war" means in musical terms and can learn and understand how it came about.
>
I know about the loudness wars, I know how to increase the apparent
loudness of a sound file. I know when to use compression and when not
to. When to use it is often when the client demands it, even when the
music doesn't.

> Seems like the half of your brain that doesn't know what I know doesn't even EXIST.
>
As you've demonstrated many times on this newsgroup that you are
severely lacking in knowledge about all things audio engineering
related, all anyone has to do in order to explore the depths of your
ignorance is to read your posts.

--
Tciao for Now!

John.

(For the information of anyone who hasn't worked it out yet, it's a
deliberate typo in my .sig file.)

[Nil[_2_]]

On 28 Oct 2014, wrote in rec.audio.pro:

> geoff: Read my o.p.: The words in CAPS hint at what audio forums
> I'm referring to. No loudness war talk allowed.

So f'n what? Why should I care about your problems in other forums? Why
would you try to bring your life's problems in here?

[[email protected]]

William Sommerwerck wrote: "That's not a correct way of explaining it. "

Ok, well at least I get the concept. What would be a better way?

[geoff]

On 29/10/2014 2:20 a.m., wrote:
> geoff: Read my o.p.: The words in CAPS hint at what audio forums I'm referring to. No loudness war talk allowed.
>

Sorry, it's too subtle for me. Can't see any words in capitals.


geoff

[[email protected]]

please don't feed the trolls

it just encourages them to come back

like the song: no reply at all

Mark

[William Sommerwerck]

wrote in message ...

William Sommerwerck wrote: "That's not a correct way of explaining it. "

> Ok, well at least I get the concept. What would be a better way?

"You can then apply gain to the remaining, quieter audio to take advantage
of the headroom achieved via the prior dynamics processing."

As the lady in the Geico commercial says, "That's not the way it works."

[[email protected]]

William Sommerwerck wrote: "As the lady in the Geico commercial says, "That's not the way it works."

Alright, then explain to me how it works in your world.

[None]

> wrote in message
...
> Who the F are YOU to presume what I know nothing about?!

You've made a big stink about displaying a whole bunch of things you
know nothing about, especially about audio. Nobody has to presume
anything; you've already supplied conclusive evidence, lots of it,
that you are utterly ignorant of pretty much everything about audio.

[None]

> Ok, well at least I get the concept.

No you don't. And whenever anybody who does understand tries to
explain it to you, you refuse to accept an educated explanation. ou
just go off on some other random infantile tangent. Then you run away
to harass people on gearslutz, where when you refuse to follow the
rules, they boot your cretinous ass to the curb, so you come slinking
back here to whine about it like a toddler.

Nobody wants to pway wiv widdoo Kwissie, because he wikes to cwap in
the sandbox. Is that too advanced for you to comprehend?

[Gray_Wolf]

On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:33:04 -0700, (hank alrich)
wrote:

[snip]
>On the Internet it might be difficult to realize we're corresponding
>with a dog, but it's pretty easy to spot who is merely full of ****.


Hank, Please don't speak unkindly of my dog. He's more civilized than
some people we know. :-)

[Gray_Wolf]

On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:20:15 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

>geoff: Read my o.p.: The words in CAPS hint at what audio forums I'm referring to. No loudness war talk allowed.

kman, If you'd be more selective in what you listen to you wouldn't
have these problems. Some people work overtime at making themselves
miserable. Stop it. It's like complaining how rough the ride is while
refusing to quit driving in the ditch.

[[email protected]]

gray wolf wrote: "kman, If you'd be more selective in what you listen to you wouldn't have these problems. "

Stop listening to Led Zep, Yes, Motown artists, and my favorite 80s artists?! People like what they like, and don't appreciate having the sh** "remastered" out of it just because some label wanted it that way.

[hank alrich]

Gray_Wolf > wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:33:04 -0700, (hank alrich)
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >On the Internet it might be difficult to realize we're corresponding
> >with a dog, but it's pretty easy to spot who is merely full of ****.
>
>
> Hank, Please don't speak unkindly of my dog. He's more civilized than
> some people we know. :-)

Oh, definitely not talking about _your_ dog. I really enjoy his
correspondence. After all, not every dog on the Internet is a dog.

--
shut up and play your guitar * HankAlrich.Com
HankandShaidriMusic.Com
YouTube.Com/WalkinayMusic

[hank alrich]

Gray_Wolf > wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 06:20:15 -0700 (PDT),
> wrote:
>
> >geoff: Read my o.p.: The words in CAPS hint at what audio forums I'm
> >referring to. No loudness war talk allowed.
> >
>
> kman, If you'd be more selective in what you listen to you wouldn't
> have these problems. Some people work overtime at making themselves
> miserable. Stop it. It's like complaining how rough the ride is while
> refusing to quit driving in the ditch.

That's grand!

--
shut up and play your guitar * HankAlrich.Com
HankandShaidriMusic.Com
YouTube.Com/WalkinayMusic

[Gray_Wolf]

On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:17:45 -0700, (hank alrich)
wrote:

>Gray_Wolf > wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:33:04 -0700, (hank alrich)
>> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>> >On the Internet it might be difficult to realize we're corresponding
>> >with a dog, but it's pretty easy to spot who is merely full of ****.
>>
>>
>> Hank, Please don't speak unkindly of my dog. He's more civilized than
>> some people we know. :-)
>
>Oh, definitely not talking about _your_ dog. I really enjoy his
>correspondence. After all, not every dog on the Internet is a dog.

LOL! Good shot! He's a good dog but something of smart ass. I was
having a discussion with him about his behavior. He gives me one of
his Chow like, arrogant, looks and says "Why don't you just worry
about being a human and let me worry about being a dog." I hate it
when he does that.

[[email protected]]

https://www.gearslutz.com/board/moan-zone/ (read the line of the deleted thread!)

[John Williamson]

On 02/11/2014 11:41, wrote:
> https://www.gearslutz.com/board/moan-zone/ (read the line of the deleted thread!)
>
You mean the one that's not there now?

--
Tciao for Now!

John.

[[email protected]]

John Williamson:

Look down thread starter column to "teknatronik". Right below post "Synthspa Public Message..." It's there. I just looked at it. Deleted by Psycho Monkey. Dude is a serial deleter. LOL

[[email protected]]

John Williamson:

Look down thread starter column to "drtechno". Right below post "Synthspa Public Message..." It's there. I just looked at it. Deleted by Psycho Monkey. Dude is a serial deleter. LOL

[None]

<whining boy moan krissie @gmail.com> wrote in message
...
> <flush krissie's krapfest>

Do have any plans to ever pull your head out of your asshole?

[hank alrich]

None > wrote:

> <whining boy moan krissie @gmail.com> wrote in message
> ...
> > <flush krissie's krapfest>
>
> Do have any plans to ever pull your head out of your asshole?

No, because he's sitting on his hands on that one.

--
shut up and play your guitar * HankAlrich.Com
HankandShaidriMusic.Com
YouTube.Com/WalkinayMusic

[elless]

"None" > wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ...
> > https://www.gearslutz.com/board/moan-zone/ (read the line of the
> > deleted thread!)
>
> They don't like you because you're a ****ing idiot and you're too
> stupid to follow the rules. They don't like you ****ting all over
> their forums.

And we don't like the way YOU talk. Please clean it up or go away.

--
Elless