motu 828mk ii

[xy]

anybody use this yet...sound quality, quietness?

[ScotFraser]

<< anybody use this yet...sound quality, quietness?
>>

Yes, and have used it daily for 2 years. It's been rock solid, however I don't
use its converters so I can't really comment on its sound. The flexibility of
routing is incredible.


Scott Fraser

[ScotFraser]

<< anybody use this yet...sound quality, quietness?
>>

Yes, and have used it daily for 2 years. It's been rock solid, however I don't
use its converters so I can't really comment on its sound. The flexibility of
routing is incredible.


Scott Fraser

[Robert Aries]

The 828 mkII has been out for two years?

In article >,
(ScotFraser) wrote:

> << anybody use this yet...sound quality, quietness?
> >>
>
> Yes, and have used it daily for 2 years. It's been rock solid, however I don't
> use its converters so I can't really comment on its sound. The flexibility of
> routing is incredible.
>
>
> Scott Fraser

[Robert Aries]

The 828 mkII has been out for two years?

In article >,
(ScotFraser) wrote:

> << anybody use this yet...sound quality, quietness?
> >>
>
> Yes, and have used it daily for 2 years. It's been rock solid, however I don't
> use its converters so I can't really comment on its sound. The flexibility of
> routing is incredible.
>
>
> Scott Fraser

[David Nobel]

(xy) wrote in message >...
> anybody use this yet...sound quality, quietness?

I've got a more specific question. Is the AD conversion on this newer
unit yet comparable to some of the value outboard units from Lucid,
Benchmark, etc.?

-- David

[David Nobel]

(xy) wrote in message >...
> anybody use this yet...sound quality, quietness?

I've got a more specific question. Is the AD conversion on this newer
unit yet comparable to some of the value outboard units from Lucid,
Benchmark, etc.?

-- David

[Thomas Bishop]

"Robert Aries" > wrote in message
> > Yes, and have used it daily for 2 years. It's been rock solid, however I
don't
> > use its converters so I can't really comment on its sound. The
flexibility of
> > routing is incredible.

Robert Aries wrote:
> The 828 mkII has been out for two years?

No, the 2408 mkII has been out for a while, as well as the 828 mkI, but the
828 mkII is very much a new product. Scott is confused.

[Thomas Bishop]

"Robert Aries" > wrote in message
> > Yes, and have used it daily for 2 years. It's been rock solid, however I
don't
> > use its converters so I can't really comment on its sound. The
flexibility of
> > routing is incredible.

Robert Aries wrote:
> The 828 mkII has been out for two years?

No, the 2408 mkII has been out for a while, as well as the 828 mkI, but the
828 mkII is very much a new product. Scott is confused.

[xy]

he probably didn't read the mk ii part of the question, that's all

[xy]

he probably didn't read the mk ii part of the question, that's all

[xy]

i'm going to go out on a limb (how long the limb is or if it's going
to crack i don't know) but i don't think the lucid stuff sounds so
hot.

[xy]

i'm going to go out on a limb (how long the limb is or if it's going
to crack i don't know) but i don't think the lucid stuff sounds so
hot.

[ScotFraser]

<< The 828 mkII has been out for two years? >>

D'oh!
Sorry, reading comprehension error. It's the 2408 mkII I've been using for 2
years. Too many things with numbers around here.


Scott Fraser

[ScotFraser]

<< The 828 mkII has been out for two years? >>

D'oh!
Sorry, reading comprehension error. It's the 2408 mkII I've been using for 2
years. Too many things with numbers around here.


Scott Fraser

[Mike Rivers]

In article > writes:

> I've got a more specific question. Is the AD conversion on this newer
> unit yet comparable to some of the value outboard units from Lucid,
> Benchmark, etc.?

Why in the world would you suspect that it might be comprarable to
devices that cost more than twice its price?

On the other hand, once you get above the junk level, the differences
in converters is pretty subtle - that doesn't mean you can't hear it,
but it means that you might want to spend your money elsewhere if
you're just building up a studio.




--
I'm really Mike Rivers - )

[Mike Rivers]

In article > writes:

> I've got a more specific question. Is the AD conversion on this newer
> unit yet comparable to some of the value outboard units from Lucid,
> Benchmark, etc.?

Why in the world would you suspect that it might be comprarable to
devices that cost more than twice its price?

On the other hand, once you get above the junk level, the differences
in converters is pretty subtle - that doesn't mean you can't hear it,
but it means that you might want to spend your money elsewhere if
you're just building up a studio.




--
I'm really Mike Rivers - )