Log in

View Full Version : Re: video of my jazz trio- dpa 4099 content


Peter Larsen[_3_]
March 4th 11, 05:42 PM
Hi Nate,

Nate Najar wrote:

> How would you record the group?

Remember Scott's frequent suggestion of getting a good main pair image to
build on. That is the very reason why I started out with a PA concept, to
get a good recording you do need a good room sound with a usable balance
between the instruments. To overstate and oversimply: the bleed has to be
well sounding.

I'd put the main pair closer "a la Scott" so as to get the stereo image from
it tighter than I perceive you have aimed for it to be as an ambience pair
and I'd move the drumkit mic in front o the kit, a couple of feet in front
of it and below the highest cymbals. Bass sounds fine with your
dpa's on them, guitar too, but I hear you and Ty say that the DPA is too
willing to hear also everything else.

It is probably fine and well to use the pickup as basis for a monitor sound
for yourself, but I keep coming back to using either a KSM 141/137 or a
Neumann 102, based on my experience with the former and Ty's files with the
latter as recording spot mic and PA front mic for the guitar.

> The biggest difficulty is that this instrumentation does not exist in
> nature- the classical guitar is way too quiet to play acoustically
> with bass and drums.

Yes and too quiet too to play with a full symphony orchestra, but Rodriguez
made that work.

> It's not like a piano. That dpa mic I clipped
> the the guitar at least gets close enough to pick up enough guitar
> for the mix. It's still not ideal- but at least the mic gets a true
> representation of the guitar so it doesn't need surgery.

I don't want to second guess a track that I haven't heard. Please do not
read me as critizing your recording, the result remains good, you asked how
I would do it.

> I'm still
> not convinced shoving a lav inside the guitar isn't the right thing
> to do, but so far my attempts have required eq surgery and still
> sound like the inside of the instrument!

It is not all that different from using a pickup, many problems are the
same, you get the wood sound and the string eigentones, but you do not get
the finger sound and I don't think you get the rotational vibration mode
sounds properly.

> And the pickup track is out of the question. Not an option.

Haven't tried it, but there are people who get away with using a pickup for
tones and a condenser for overtones.

> For the gig, the instrument's pickup is fed to a small amplifier and
> sound system. It's a terrible sound but the only real option for a
> gig.

I beg to differ, for ultimate recording quality you need to have good basis
sound from all instruments. The alternative to the dpa could be to use a
Neumann 102 real close, some of the time the dpa-stuff is too clean because
the instrument sound is not linear that close to the instrument, the Neumann
colourations may be just what works, also for PA. I have heard great PA on a
pair of classical guitars, condensor mics and a pair of Tannoy 12" coax.

> Obviously in a proper studio with an iso booth and headphones I can
> record no problem, but I've always struggled to find some sort of
> live representation- and I really want to iron it out!

You're not all that far away from it, to sum it up: improve the sound of the
amplicatio of the guitar and you're quite likely to have the recording
"done" using the concept you used. The ensemble is a chamber music ensemble,
so my approach would be a la chamber music recording with spot microphones
added to the mix to fix a direct-to-reflected ratio that was too wet. That
approach has the main pair delivering the stereo perspective and - when I
use it - the spot microhone(s) delayed as much as required for their
contribution to arrive late in the "haas window" after the main pair
contribution.

> N

Your mileage may vary from 0 to infinity, all of the above is just theory
based on marginal knowledge of the setup, I have made careful plans
previously and plain discarded them on site and improvised something else,
either because of room logistics or because the ensemble shuffled itself
around. For a balanced recording you need to get the ensemble balanced and
well sounding so that the room sound is well balanced.


Kind regards

Peter Larsen

Nate Najar
March 6th 11, 05:29 PM
On Mar 4, 12:42*pm, "Peter Larsen" > wrote:
> Hi Nate,
>
> Nate Najar wrote:
> > How would you record the group?
>
> Remember Scott's frequent suggestion of getting a good main pair image to
> build on. That is the very reason why I started out with a PA concept, to
> get a good recording you do need a good room sound with a usable balance
> between the instruments. To overstate and oversimply: the bleed has to be
> well sounding.
>
> I'd put the main pair closer "a la Scott" so as to get the stereo image from
> it tighter than I perceive you have aimed for it to be as an ambience pair
> and I'd move the drumkit mic in front o the kit, a couple of feet in front
> of it and below the highest cymbals. Bass sounds fine with your
> dpa's on them, guitar too, but I hear you and Ty say that the DPA is too
> willing to hear also everything else.
>
> It is probably fine and well to use the pickup as basis for a monitor sound
> for yourself, but I keep coming back to using either a KSM 141/137 or a
> Neumann 102, based on my experience with the former and Ty's files with the
> latter as recording spot mic and PA front mic for the guitar.
>
> *> The biggest difficulty is that this instrumentation does not exist in
>
> > nature- the classical guitar is way too quiet to play acoustically
> > with bass and drums.
>
> Yes and too quiet too to play with a full symphony orchestra, but Rodriguez
> made that work.
>
> > It's not like a piano. *That dpa mic I clipped
> > the the guitar at least gets close enough to pick up enough guitar
> > for the mix. *It's still not ideal- but at least the mic gets a true
> > representation of the guitar so it doesn't need surgery.
>
> I don't want to second guess a track that I haven't heard. Please do not
> read me as critizing your recording, the result remains good, you asked how
> I would do it.
>
> > I'm still
> > not convinced shoving a lav inside the guitar isn't the right thing
> > to do, but so far my attempts have required eq surgery and still
> > sound like the inside of the instrument!
>
> It is not all that different from using a pickup, many problems are the
> same, you get the wood sound and the string eigentones, but you do not get
> the finger sound and I don't think you get the rotational vibration mode
> sounds properly.
>
> > And the pickup track is out of the question. *Not an option.
>
> Haven't tried it, but there are people who get away with using a pickup for
> tones and a condenser for overtones.
>
> > For the gig, the instrument's pickup is fed to a small amplifier and
> > sound system. *It's a terrible sound but the only real option for a
> > gig.
>
> I beg to differ, for ultimate recording quality you need to have good basis
> sound from all instruments. The alternative to the dpa could be to use a
> Neumann 102 real close, some of the time the dpa-stuff is too clean because
> the instrument sound is not linear that close to the instrument, the Neumann
> colourations may be just what works, also for PA. I have heard great PA on a
> pair of classical guitars, condensor mics and a pair of Tannoy 12" coax.
>
> > Obviously in a proper studio with an iso booth and headphones I can
> > record no problem, but I've always struggled to find some sort of
> > live representation- and I really want to iron it out!
>
> You're not all that far away from it, to sum it up: improve the sound of the
> amplicatio of the guitar and you're quite likely to have the recording
> "done" using the concept you used. The ensemble is a chamber music ensemble,
> so my approach would be a la chamber music recording with spot microphones
> added to the mix to fix a direct-to-reflected ratio that was too wet. That
> approach has the main pair delivering the stereo perspective and - when I
> use it - the spot microhone(s) delayed as much as required for their
> contribution to arrive late in the "haas window" after the main pair
> contribution.
>
> > N
>
> Your mileage may vary from 0 to infinity, all of the above is just theory
> based on marginal knowledge of the setup, I have made careful plans
> previously and plain discarded them on site and improvised something else,
> either because of room logistics or because the ensemble shuffled itself
> around. For a balanced recording you need to get the ensemble balanced and
> well sounding so that the room sound is well balanced.
>
> * Kind regards
>
> * Peter Larsen

thanks for this. this sounds like good advice.

and to everyone who has been responding, I really appreciate the
comments- it is all educational and informative and helpful and I'm
grateful for the experience of you guys.

I googled those tannoy speakers. they look great but i cna't seem to
find anywhere to purchase or a price. I'll have to call Tannoy i
guess.

I need to find a mixer with good eq that I can use for FOH for this
band. 8-12 channels but a really high quality board.

if i had the bread (which i don't!) I'd get a metric halo ULN8 and run
FOH with it.

N

Peter Larsen[_3_]
March 6th 11, 06:45 PM
Nate Najar wrote:

> I need to find a mixer with good eq that I can use for FOH for this
> band. 8-12 channels but a really high quality board.

I am very happy with my small Soundcraft EPM's, an EFX may be more suitable.

> if i had the bread (which i don't!) I'd get a metric halo ULN8 and run
> FOH with it.

Can't comment.

Thank you for the feedback Nate!

> N

Kind regards

Peter Larsen

Scott Dorsey
March 6th 11, 07:00 PM
Peter Larsen > wrote:
>Nate Najar wrote:
>
>> I need to find a mixer with good eq that I can use for FOH for this
>> band. 8-12 channels but a really high quality board.
>
>I am very happy with my small Soundcraft EPM's, an EFX may be more suitable.

Buy the cheap Mackie Onyx. Then take the money you saved by not buying
a shortloaded Cadac S-Class and put it into speakers.

Put all your money into speakers and then put some more in. If you're
dealing with decent rooms and widely spaced audiences, consider either
a used 12" Radian coaxial or used Tannoy V12 or T12.

The console, you can live with cheap crap. Microphones and speakers, you
cannot live cheap crap and even the high end gear is really kind of lousy
all things considered.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

hank alrich
March 6th 11, 10:03 PM
Nate Najar > wrote:

> if i had the bread (which i don't!) I'd get a metric halo ULN8 and run
> FOH with it.

You could pick up a used 2882+DSP 2d unit for a lot less and do the same
thing. I've used mine for FOH & mons, and am about to start doing it
regularly.

--
shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/
http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html
http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShaidriAlrichwithDougHarman

hank alrich
March 6th 11, 10:03 PM
Scott Dorsey > wrote:

> Peter Larsen > wrote:
> >Nate Najar wrote:
> >
> >> I need to find a mixer with good eq that I can use for FOH for this
> >> band. 8-12 channels but a really high quality board.
> >
> >I am very happy with my small Soundcraft EPM's, an EFX may be more suitable.
>
> Buy the cheap Mackie Onyx. Then take the money you saved by not buying
> a shortloaded Cadac S-Class and put it into speakers.

Those are decent. Just installed an Onyx 24:4 live board in a church,
along with other upgrades. The pres are adequate if a little
wimpy-seeming, the EQ is surprisingly good. I have reason to suspect
component tolerances are a bit on the wild side, but it's a workable
console within the venue.

--
shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/
http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html
http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShaidriAlrichwithDougHarman