Statehood for Puerto Rico

[Bret L]

It's a stupid idea. It should be independent or be given back to
Spain. It's a 100 percent liability. Statehood advocates want it as a
derail on Official English and to brown up the voter rolls for
Democrats.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 3, 3:00*pm, Bret L > wrote:
> *It's a stupid idea. It should be independent or be given back to
> Spain. It's a 100 percent liability. Statehood advocates want it as a
> derail on Official English and to brown up the voter rolls for
> Democrats.

LOL!!! Puerto Ricans are all US citizens. If we grant independence,
it will empty out, residents will flee to the US, I hope all of
them will end up in your neighborhood. Not that I wish such
bad fortune on them.

[Bret L]

On Jul 3, 2:36*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On Jul 3, 3:00*pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > *It's a stupid idea. It should be independent or be given back to
> > Spain. It's a 100 percent liability. Statehood advocates want it as a
> > derail on Official English and to brown up the voter rolls for
> > Democrats.
>
> LOL!!! Puerto Ricans are all US citizens. If we grant independence,
> it will empty out, residents will flee to the US, I hope all of
> them will end up in your neighborhood. Not that I wish such
> bad fortune on them.

We made them citizens, we can make them noncitizens.

The Constitution is after all a living document, you know.

Official English would help deter many. Lack of welfare would deter
more.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 3, 3:44*pm, Bret L > wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2:36*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On Jul 3, 3:00*pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > *It's a stupid idea. It should be independent or be given back to
> > > Spain. It's a 100 percent liability. Statehood advocates want it as a
> > > derail on Official English and to brown up the voter rolls for
> > > Democrats.
>
> > LOL!!! Puerto Ricans are all US citizens. If we grant independence,
> > it will empty out, residents will flee to the US, I hope all of
> > them will end up in your neighborhood. Not that I wish such
> > bad fortune on them.
>
> *We made them citizens, we can make them noncitizens.
>

No, fact is, we can't, they are EQUAL to you.
They are BORN US citizens.

> *The Constitution is after all a living document, you know.
>

Maybe we can change it to strip YOU of your citizenship

> *Official English would help deter many.

They are citizens, no language test required.

>Lack of welfare would deter
> more.

You will have to cut everyone off, not that the idea
would revolt you.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 3, 3:44*pm, Bret L > wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2:36*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On Jul 3, 3:00*pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > *It's a stupid idea. It should be independent or be given back to
> > > Spain. It's a 100 percent liability. Statehood advocates want it as a
> > > derail on Official English and to brown up the voter rolls for
> > > Democrats.
>
> > LOL!!! Puerto Ricans are all US citizens. If we grant independence,
> > it will empty out, residents will flee to the US, I hope all of
> > them will end up in your neighborhood. Not that I wish such
> > bad fortune on them.
>
> *We made them citizens, we can make them noncitizens.
>
> *The Constitution is after all a living document, you know.
>
> *Official English would help deter many. Lack of welfare would deter
> more.

This post was particularly hateful, even fro you Bratzi.

[Bret L]

It's very simple. When the Czech and Slovak Republics were formed out
of what had been Czechoslovakia, you were either a national of one or
the other Republic.Not both. When the US became independent of
Britain, you were no longer a British subject if you were an American.
How hard is this?

Or are all Americans still also British subjects entitled to a UK
Passport? If you are saying Puerto Ricans are all Americans forever,
you have to be saying all Americans are Britons forever. Or is that
not true? And if not why not?

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 4, 9:59*am, Bret L > wrote:
> *It's very simple. When the Czech and Slovak Republics were formed out
> of what had been Czechoslovakia, you were either a national of one or
> the other Republic.Not both. *When the US became independent of
> Britain, you were no longer a British subject if you were an American.
> How hard is this?
>
> *Or are all Americans still also British subjects entitled to a UK
> Passport? If you are saying Puerto Ricans are all Americans forever,
> you have to be saying all Americans are Britons forever. Or is that
> not true? And if not why not?

They are US citizens for as long as they live, if they want to be.
Chzekoslavakia is a bad analogy, because that country became defunct.
As far as Britain and the US, a colonial could remain a British
subject and return
to England, many loyalists did just that.
Evidently this subject is a little more difficult than you are able to
understand.

So, if PR became independent, PR's will have a choice of
citizenship, and maybe, depending upon what PR elects to do, they
could
be dual citizens.

"What is Dual Citizenship: Dual citizenship means that an
individual is a citizen of two countries at the same time. It is
also possible to be a citizen of three or more countries.
However, every country has its own laws regarding dual citizenship.
Some countries allow it and others do not, while some countries
have no particular laws regarding dual citizenship.
Dual citizenship is not something that can be applied for.
It is a process that happens when a person becomes a citizen of
another country, in addition to his or her country of birth.
Dual citizenship occurs automatically for some individuals.
For example: a child is born in the United States to foreign parents.
In this example this child has U.S. Dual Citizenship since the child
is
automatically a citizen of the United States and a citizen of its
parent's home country.
The same applies to children of U.S. citizens born abroad where the
child is both a U.S. citizen and a citizen of the country of birth."

https://www.usimmigrationsupport.org/dual-citizenship.html

[Bret L]

On Jul 4, 10:05*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On Jul 4, 9:59*am, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > *It's very simple. When the Czech and Slovak Republics were formed out
> > of what had been Czechoslovakia, you were either a national of one or
> > the other Republic.Not both. *When the US became independent of
> > Britain, you were no longer a British subject if you were an American.
> > How hard is this?
>
> > *Or are all Americans still also British subjects entitled to a UK
> > Passport? If you are saying Puerto Ricans are all Americans forever,
> > you have to be saying all Americans are Britons forever. Or is that
> > not true? And if not why not?
>
> They are US citizens for as long as they live, if they want to be.
> Chzekoslavakia is a bad analogy, because that country became defunct.

As ours might and not very distantly.

> As far as Britain and the US, a colonial could remain a British
> subject and return
> to England, many loyalists did just that.

Tories were kicked out to Canada or Britain, many were born here of
parents born here. It's actually quite interesting. But
> Evidently this subject is a little more difficult than you are able to
> understand.
>
> So, if PR became independent, PR's will have a choice of
> citizenship, and maybe, depending upon what PR elects to do, they
> could
> be dual citizens.

PRs would be allowed American citizenship at the time of separation,
under such terms as may be set-which would, if written sanely, state
they must be resident in the US at that time. While there would be
some packing-in at the particular time, it would be finite and
controllable. Puerto Rico could not remain a permanent producing
ground for wave after wave of Nueva York bound cucarachas. Those who
came here would have expectations of a total break with the homeland,
so to speak.

A few US citizens would head there too, but not very many. It will be
fascinating to see how an independent Puerto Rico deals with
immigration and sovereignty issues!

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 4, 10:28*pm, Bret L > wrote:
> On Jul 4, 10:05*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On Jul 4, 9:59*am, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > *It's very simple. When the Czech and Slovak Republics were formed out
> > > of what had been Czechoslovakia, you were either a national of one or
> > > the other Republic.Not both. *When the US became independent of
> > > Britain, you were no longer a British subject if you were an American..
> > > How hard is this?
>
> > > *Or are all Americans still also British subjects entitled to a UK
> > > Passport? If you are saying Puerto Ricans are all Americans forever,
> > > you have to be saying all Americans are Britons forever. Or is that
> > > not true? And if not why not?
>
> > They are US citizens for as long as they live, if they want to be.
> > Chzekoslavakia is a bad analogy, because that country became defunct.
>
> As ours might and not very distantly.
>
> > As far as Britain and the US, a colonial could remain a British
> > subject and return
> > to England, many loyalists did just that.
>
> *Tories were kicked out to Canada or Britain, many were born here of
> parents born here. It's actually quite interesting. *But
>
> > Evidently this subject is a little more difficult than you are able to
> > understand.
>
> > So, if PR became independent, PR's will have a choice of
> > citizenship, and maybe, depending upon what PR elects to do, they
> > could
> > be dual citizens.
>
> *PRs would be allowed American citizenship at the time of separation,
> under such terms as may be set-which would, if written sanely, state
> they must be resident in the US at that time. While there would be
> some packing-in at the particular time, it would be finite and
> controllable. Puerto Rico could not remain a permanent producing
> ground for wave after wave of Nueva York bound cucarachas. Those who
> came here would have expectations of a total break with the homeland,
> so to speak.
>
> *A few US citizens would head there too, but not very many. It will be
> fascinating to see how an independent Puerto Rico deals with
> immigration and sovereignty issues!

cucarachas? cockroaches?
You call Puerto Ricans cockroaches?LOL!!! and you told us you don't
use racial epithets.

Well, there are a lot of things you are wrong about up there.
the USA isn't going anywhere soon, and that is irrelevant, even so,
it is not analagous.

And according to law and Constitutional principles, any natural born
US citizen can't be stripped of citizenship for reason of living in
another country. You can't change that.

Have you finished spewing your bile and hatreds of Puerto Ricans yet?

[Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 4, 10:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:

> Have you finished spewing your bile and hatreds of Puerto Ricans yet?

Bratzi doesn't "hate" anyone.

He just senses the superiority of a particular group, the whites.
While it wouldn't bother him if all nonwhites died, he doesn't "hate"
them.

And he's NOT a Nazi despite the stiking similarity in views.

[Bret L]

On Jul 4, 10:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On Jul 4, 10:28*pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 10:05*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 4, 9:59*am, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > > *It's very simple. When the Czech and Slovak Republics were formed out
> > > > of what had been Czechoslovakia, you were either a national of one or
> > > > the other Republic.Not both. *When the US became independent of
> > > > Britain, you were no longer a British subject if you were an American.
> > > > How hard is this?
>
> > > > *Or are all Americans still also British subjects entitled to a UK
> > > > Passport? If you are saying Puerto Ricans are all Americans forever,
> > > > you have to be saying all Americans are Britons forever. Or is that
> > > > not true? And if not why not?
>
> > > They are US citizens for as long as they live, if they want to be.
> > > Chzekoslavakia is a bad analogy, because that country became defunct.
>
> > As ours might and not very distantly.
>
> > > As far as Britain and the US, a colonial could remain a British
> > > subject and return
> > > to England, many loyalists did just that.
>
> > *Tories were kicked out to Canada or Britain, many were born here of
> > parents born here. It's actually quite interesting. *But
>
> > > Evidently this subject is a little more difficult than you are able to
> > > understand.
>
> > > So, if PR became independent, PR's will have a choice of
> > > citizenship, and maybe, depending upon what PR elects to do, they
> > > could
> > > be dual citizens.
>
> > *PRs would be allowed American citizenship at the time of separation,
> > under such terms as may be set-which would, if written sanely, state
> > they must be resident in the US at that time. While there would be
> > some packing-in at the particular time, it would be finite and
> > controllable. Puerto Rico could not remain a permanent producing
> > ground for wave after wave of Nueva York bound cucarachas. Those who
> > came here would have expectations of a total break with the homeland,
> > so to speak.
>
> > *A few US citizens would head there too, but not very many. It will be
> > fascinating to see how an independent Puerto Rico deals with
> > immigration and sovereignty issues!
>
> cucarachas? cockroaches?
> You call Puerto Ricans cockroaches?LOL!!! and you told us you don't
> use racial *epithets.

Everybody in New York calls them that. I mean, everybody. It's sort
of an affectionate term in a weird way.

I have heard it from the most politically correct Jewesses in
Manhattan.

[Bret L]

On Jul 5, 3:53*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 10:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > Have you finished spewing your bile and hatreds of Puerto Ricans yet?
>
> Bratzi doesn't "hate" anyone.
>
> He just senses the superiority of a particular group, the whites.
> While it wouldn't bother him if all nonwhites died, he doesn't "hate"
> them.

I have no desire to see any people exterminated. It's the mixers that
want ALL peoples exterminated-everyone the same homogenous kind.

[Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 5, 8:03*pm, Bret L > wrote:
> On Jul 5, 3:53*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > On Jul 4, 10:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > Have you finished spewing your bile and hatreds of Puerto Ricans yet?
>
> > Bratzi doesn't "hate" anyone.
>
> > He just senses the superiority of a particular group, the whites.
> > While it wouldn't bother him if all nonwhites died, he doesn't "hate"
> > them.
>
> *I have no desire to see any people exterminated. It's the mixers that
> want ALL peoples exterminated-everyone the same homogenous kind.

Oh, you mean "humans"?

Duh.

[Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 5, 8:01*pm, Bret L > wrote:
> On Jul 4, 10:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 10:28*pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 4, 10:05*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 4, 9:59*am, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > > > *It's very simple. When the Czech and Slovak Republics were formed out
> > > > > of what had been Czechoslovakia, you were either a national of one or
> > > > > the other Republic.Not both. *When the US became independent of
> > > > > Britain, you were no longer a British subject if you were an American.
> > > > > How hard is this?
>
> > > > > *Or are all Americans still also British subjects entitled to a UK
> > > > > Passport? If you are saying Puerto Ricans are all Americans forever,
> > > > > you have to be saying all Americans are Britons forever. Or is that
> > > > > not true? And if not why not?
>
> > > > They are US citizens for as long as they live, if they want to be.
> > > > Chzekoslavakia is a bad analogy, because that country became defunct.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jul 5, 8:01*pm, Bret L > wrote:
> On Jul 4, 10:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 4, 10:28*pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 4, 10:05*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 4, 9:59*am, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > > > *It's very simple. When the Czech and Slovak Republics were formed out
> > > > > of what had been Czechoslovakia, you were either a national of one or
> > > > > the other Republic.Not both. *When the US became independent of
> > > > > Britain, you were no longer a British subject if you were an American.
> > > > > How hard is this?
>
> > > > > *Or are all Americans still also British subjects entitled to a UK
> > > > > Passport? If you are saying Puerto Ricans are all Americans forever,
> > > > > you have to be saying all Americans are Britons forever. Or is that
> > > > > not true? And if not why not?
>
> > > > They are US citizens for as long as they live, if they want to be.
> > > > Chzekoslavakia is a bad analogy, because that country became defunct.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 5, 9:01*pm, Bret L > wrote:

>
> *I have heard it from the most politically correct Jewesses in
> Manhattan.

they actually let you hang with them???

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 5, 9:03*pm, Bret L > wrote:
> On Jul 5, 3:53*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > On Jul 4, 10:18*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > Have you finished spewing your bile and hatreds of Puerto Ricans yet?
>
> > Bratzi doesn't "hate" anyone.
>
> > He just senses the superiority of a particular group, the whites.
> > While it wouldn't bother him if all nonwhites died, he doesn't "hate"
> > them.

> *I have no desire to see any people exterminated. It's the mixers that
> want ALL peoples exterminated-everyone the same homogenous kind.

that would not be exterminating people, it wou;d be merely blurring
the distinctions of racial purity,
and racial purity is meaningless. Don't worry, there will still be
enough
cockroaches left to be hiding in your kitchen cupboards at night.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jul 6, 12:17*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On Jul 5, 9:01*pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
>
>
> > *I have heard it from the most politically correct Jewesses in
> > Manhattan.
>
> they actually let you hang with them???

He's probably never been in Manhattan. He probably drank a Manhattan
once with his fellow losers at the Missouri trailer park.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Jul 6, 12:17*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 9:01*pm, Bret L > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > *I have heard it from the most politically correct Jewesses in
> > > Manhattan.
> >
> > they actually let you hang with them???
>
> He's probably never been in Manhattan. He probably drank a Manhattan
> once with his fellow losers at the Missouri trailer park.

Or a trailer park in Manhattan, Kansas.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jul 6, 12:21*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *Boon > wrote:
> > On Jul 6, 12:17 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> > > On Jul 5, 9:01 pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > > I have heard it from the most politically correct Jewesses in
> > > > Manhattan.
>
> > > they actually let you hang with them???
>
> > He's probably never been in Manhattan. He probably drank a Manhattan
> > once with his fellow losers at the Missouri trailer park.
>
> Or a trailer park in Manhattan, Kansas.

That's a nice college town, which would imply that Bratzi's somehow
cosmopolitan enough to live in a nice college town. Then again, he
does fit the stereotype of a townie.

[Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 6, 4:16*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Jul 6, 12:21*pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> > *Boon > wrote:
> > > On Jul 6, 12:17 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> > > > On Jul 5, 9:01 pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > > > I have heard it from the most politically correct Jewesses in
> > > > > Manhattan.
>
> > > > they actually let you hang with them???
>
> > > He's probably never been in Manhattan. He probably drank a Manhattan
> > > once with his fellow losers at the Missouri trailer park.
>
> > Or a trailer park in Manhattan, Kansas.
>
> That's a nice college town, which would imply that Bratzi's somehow
> cosmopolitan enough to live in a nice college town. Then again, he
> does fit the stereotype of a townie.

Every town in the midwest has its trailer court.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 6, 1:21*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *Boon > wrote:
> > On Jul 6, 12:17 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> > > On Jul 5, 9:01 pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > > I have heard it from the most politically correct Jewesses in
> > > > Manhattan.
>
> > > they actually let you hang with them???
>
> > He's probably never been in Manhattan. He probably drank a Manhattan
> > once with his fellow losers at the Missouri trailer park.
>
> Or a trailer park in Manhattan, Kansas.

that is a college town, too classy for bratzi

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jul 6, 9:43*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Jul 6, 4:16*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 6, 12:21*pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > >,
>
> > > *Boon > wrote:
> > > > On Jul 6, 12:17 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> > > > > On Jul 5, 9:01 pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > > > > I have heard it from the most politically correct Jewesses in
> > > > > > Manhattan.
>
> > > > > they actually let you hang with them???
>
> > > > He's probably never been in Manhattan. He probably drank a Manhattan
> > > > once with his fellow losers at the Missouri trailer park.
>
> > > Or a trailer park in Manhattan, Kansas.
>
> > That's a nice college town, which would imply that Bratzi's somehow
> > cosmopolitan enough to live in a nice college town. Then again, he
> > does fit the stereotype of a townie.
>
> Every town in the midwest has its trailer court.

You would know.

[Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 6, 11:45*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Jul 6, 9:43*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Jul 6, 4:16*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 6, 12:21*pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > > *Boon > wrote:
> > > > > On Jul 6, 12:17 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> > > > > > On Jul 5, 9:01 pm, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I have heard it from the most politically correct Jewesses in
> > > > > > > Manhattan.
>
> > > > > > they actually let you hang with them???
>
> > > > > He's probably never been in Manhattan. He probably drank a Manhattan
> > > > > once with his fellow losers at the Missouri trailer park.
>
> > > > Or a trailer park in Manhattan, Kansas.
>
> > > That's a nice college town, which would imply that Bratzi's somehow
> > > cosmopolitan enough to live in a nice college town. Then again, he
> > > does fit the stereotype of a townie.
>
> > Every town in the midwest has its trailer court.
>
> You would know.

Yes, I drive past them all the time.

My car actually runs, you see, unlike the POS you drive (push?) that
you tried to hide from me.