Re: Radar 24's 44.1/48 KHz Convertors

[EggHd]

<< I didn't find them "very good" but they are entirely usable, and a lot
better than most of the stock converters on gear these days. >>

I would agree with the way you stated it.

<< If you get them, you won't spend a lot of time worrying about them. But
you can
do better for more money. >>

Again, I agree. if I had an important rock or pop project coming up, I would
not be stressed because I was using the stock coverters. There would be way
more that could screw up the sound of the project than the converters.



---------------------------------------
"I know enough to know I don't know enough"

[LeBaron & Alrich]

EggHd > wrote:

> << I didn't find them "very good" but they are entirely usable, and a lot
> better than most of the stock converters on gear these days. >>

> I would agree with the way you stated it.

> << If you get them, you won't spend a lot of time worrying about them.
> But you can do better for more money. >>

> Again, I agree. if I had an important rock or pop project coming up, I would
> not be stressed because I was using the stock coverters. There would be way
> more that could screw up the sound of the project than the converters.

Many thanks, youse guise.

--
ha

[HenryShap]

I have a RADAR 2 with 'Classic' convertors. All I know is it sounds an order of
magnitude better than the Tascam DA38 and DA78 I had been previously using.
Much smoother and classier sounding. I also had a Tascam 2424 for for a brief
period a couple of years ago. I don't remember finding them significantly
better when compared to the DA78.