What Does Scott Mean?

[Boon[_2_]]

When I was back in LA, a couple of radio talk show hosts would play a
game called "What Did Jesse Jackson Say?" The hosts would play a clip
from one of Jesse's speeches featuring a mumbled phrase from Jackson,
and call-in guests would try to figure out the quote verbatim.

Watching Scott struggle to communicate over on the Chargers group, I
though we could play a similar game..."What Does Scott Mean?"

Here's this week's quote from Scott:

"If I was GM he'd be my safety valve, injury insurance spending most
of the games inactive ala Michael Bennett."

So...what did Scott mean?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 6, 3:21*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 6, 12:47*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > When I was back in LA, a couple of radio talk show hosts would play a
> > game called "What Did Jesse Jackson Say?" The hosts would play a clip
> > from one of Jesse's speeches featuring a mumbled phrase from Jackson,
> > and call-in guests would try to figure out the quote verbatim.
>
> > Watching Scott struggle to communicate over on the Chargers group, I
> > though we could play a similar game..."What Does Scott Mean?"
>
> > Here's this week's quote from Scott:
>
> > "If I was GM he'd be my safety valve, injury insurance spending most
> > of the games inactive ala Michael Bennett."
>
> > So...what did Scott mean?
>
> *We were discussing where LT might go and what role can he fill.

You are exempt from this game, since you obviously know what you think
you meant,

> Thanks for showing you know as much about football as you do audio.

Thanks for the compliment!

>
> So why are you spamming an audio group with football trolls?

Because you're a funny dude, and we all need a good laugh.

>
> Shouldn't you be soldering copper mesh over your windows
> to protect your poorly designed system from your neighbors nasty wi-
> fi?

Why would I do that?

By the way, perhaps you could email Jim Smith, the best audio setup
man in the biz, and tell him your thoughts on wireless routers. Be
sure to tell him that your system sounds like crap first.
> ScottW

[Boon[_2_]]

Since Scott spoiled the first round, here's another:

"I suspect his leadership authority was tainted by his tipp-toe out
of
bounds with a just a look from a DB running style."

What does Scott mean?

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> Since Scott spoiled the first round, here's another:
>
> "I suspect his leadership authority was tainted by his tipp-toe out
> of
> bounds with a just a look from a DB running style."
>
> What does Scott mean?

At first thought, I took it to mean his hyphen key broke as he attempted
to type 'tip-toe.'


Lessee: I suspect with just a look from a DB running out of bounds his
leadership authority was tainted by his tip-toe style.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 6, 4:39*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *Boon > wrote:
> > Since Scott spoiled the first round, here's another:
>
> > "I suspect his leadership authority was tainted by his tipp-toe out
> > of
> > bounds with a just a look from a DB running style."
>
> > What does Scott mean?
>
> At first thought, I took it to mean his hyphen key broke as he attempted
> to type 'tip-toe.'
>
> Lessee: I suspect with just a look from a DB running out of bounds his
> leadership authority was tainted by his tip-toe style.

Close, but the judges say no cigar.

[Boon[_2_]]

For a change of pace, let's check out Scott on the Padres group:

"Sounds like Cunningham doesn't really expect a long career only 5
years removed from his draft and talking of ending it here."

What does Scott mean?

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> For a change of pace, let's check out Scott on the Padres group:
>
> "Sounds like Cunningham doesn't really expect a long career only 5
> years removed from his draft and talking of ending it here."
>
> What does Scott mean?

It's a reference to American Graffiti 2.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 10, 9:06*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *Boon > wrote:
> > For a change of pace, let's check out Scott on the Padres group:
>
> > "Sounds like Cunningham doesn't really expect a long career only 5
> > years removed from his draft and talking of ending it here."
>
> > What does Scott mean?
>
> It's a reference to American Graffiti 2.

We have a winner!!

[Boon[_2_]]

Here's this week's gem:

When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother
to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step
no matter what you do, you're slow.

So...what does Scott mean?

[GeoSynch]

Chim Chimpsky chimed in:

> When guys come up to just ... say ... you're slow.

> So...what does Scott mean?

That the Buffoon is a retard or, if you will, a Buffoontard?

[Harry Lavo]

"Boon" > wrote in message
...
> Here's this week's gem:
>
> When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother
> to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step
> no matter what you do, you're slow.
>
> So...what does Scott mean?

Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
"Harry Lavo" > wrote:

> "Boon" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Here's this week's gem:
> >
> > When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother
> > to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step
> > no matter what you do, you're slow.
> >
> > So...what does Scott mean?
>
> Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan.

I thought he was talking about short people playing Rock Band in his
living room.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 13, 9:46*am, "Harry Lavo" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > Here's this week's gem:
>
> > When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother
> > to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step
> > no matter what you do, you're slow.
>
> > So...what does Scott mean?
>
> Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan.

I am a football fan, and it's still endlessly amusing to me.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 13, 10:01*am, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article >,
> *"Harry Lavo" > wrote:
>
> > "Boon" > wrote in message
> ...
> > > Here's this week's gem:
>
> > > When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother
> > > to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step
> > > no matter what you do, you're slow.
>
> > > So...what does Scott mean?
>
> > Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan.
>
> I thought he was talking about short people playing Rock Band in his
> living room.

Almost. Scott wants the song "Short People" to appear on the next
version of Rock Band.

Of course, Randy Newman is bubblegum pop music.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 13, 9:46*am, "Harry Lavo" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > Here's this week's gem:
>
> > When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother
> > to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step
> > no matter what you do, you're slow.
>
> > So...what does Scott mean?
>
> Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan.

I would think that somebody who can run with a receiver "step for step
no matter what you do" isn't "slow". I would think the slow corners
would tend to jam in an attempt to remove the receiver's speed
advantage.

I'm a football fan. Can you enlighten me on 2pid's deeper meaning?

[Clyde Slick]

On Mar 14, 12:38*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Mar 13, 9:46*am, "Harry Lavo" > wrote:
>
> > "Boon" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > > Here's this week's gem:
>
> > > When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother
> > > to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step
> > > no matter what you do, you're slow.
>
> > > So...what does Scott mean?
>
> > Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan.
>
> I would think that somebody who can run with a receiver "step for step
> no matter what you do" isn't "slow". I would think the slow corners
> would tend to jam in an attempt to remove the receiver's speed
> advantage.
>
> I'm a football fan. Can you enlighten me on 2pid's deeper meaning?

to me, he is saying that the receiver is slow.his problem is that his
pronouns don't match

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 13, 2:40*pm, Boon > wrote:

> > I thought he was talking about short people playing Rock Band in his
> > living room.
>
> Almost. Scott wants the song "Short People" to appear on the next
> version of Rock Band.
> Of course, Randy Newman is bubblegum pop music.

Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy
and double standards. I can see where that description could overload
duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition
of the "bubblegum" slur.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 14, 2:21*pm, Glanbrok > wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2:40*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > I thought he was talking about short people playing Rock Band in his
> > > living room.
>
> > Almost. Scott wants the song "Short People" to appear on the next
> > version of Rock Band.
> > Of course, Randy Newman is bubblegum pop music.
>
> Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy
> and double standards. I can see where that description could overload
> duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition
> of the "bubblegum" slur.

Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little
he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls
"progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is
rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions,
noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they
read.

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 14, 3:44*pm, Boon > wrote:

> > Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy
> > and double standards. I can see where that description could overload
> > duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition
> > of the "bubblegum" slur.
>
> Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little
> he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls
> "progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is
> rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions,
> noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they
> read.

I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
Witless's bark reflex.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 14, 3:09*pm, Glanbrok > wrote:
> On Mar 14, 3:44*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy
> > > and double standards. I can see where that description could overload
> > > duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition
> > > of the "bubblegum" slur.
>
> > Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little
> > he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls
> > "progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is
> > rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions,
> > noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they
> > read.
>
> I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
> Witless's bark reflex.

Nope, they're from Albuquerque.

I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip****
came along.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Mar 14, 3:09*pm, Glanbrok > wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 3:44*pm, Boon > wrote:
> >
> > > > Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy
> > > > and double standards. I can see where that description could overload
> > > > duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition
> > > > of the "bubblegum" slur.
> >
> > > Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little
> > > he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls
> > > "progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is
> > > rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions,
> > > noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they
> > > read.
> >
> > I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
> > Witless's bark reflex.
>
> Nope, they're from Albuquerque.
>
> I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip****
> came along.

Some people don't want their lives changed.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 14, 3:54*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Boon > wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 3:09*pm, Glanbrok > wrote:
> > > On Mar 14, 3:44*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > > > Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy
> > > > > and double standards. I can see where that description could overload
> > > > > duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition
> > > > > of the "bubblegum" slur.
>
> > > > Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little
> > > > he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls
> > > > "progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is
> > > > rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions,
> > > > noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they
> > > > read.
>
> > > I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
> > > Witless's bark reflex.
>
> > Nope, they're from Albuquerque.
>
> > I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip****
> > came along.
>
> Some people don't want their lives changed.

You can't be a music lover if you hate more than you love.

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:

> > > I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
> > > Witless's bark reflex.
>
> > Nope, they're from Albuquerque.
>
> > I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip****
> > came along.
>
> Some people don't want their lives changed.

Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico?

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 14, 6:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:

> > You just have to make allowances for Scottie-speak.
>
> What do you suppose 2pid's native tongue is? I'm guessing Pidgen.

Here's an interesting take on the unreliability of verbal
communication from the likes Witlessmongrel:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * *

Dog Body Language

Any dog owner will tell you that their four-legged family members
speak volumes with their bodies. Here are some typical signals dogs
use:

Face: Dogs will wrinkle or straighten their foreheads to show
confusion or determination.
Eyes: A dog’s eyes brighten when he looks at a creature he considers
friendly. When he is afraid, his pupils dilate and he shows the whites
of his eyes.
Lips, teeth and tongue: If your dog is happy or wants to play, he may
pull his lips back and show his teeth in what appears to be a smile.
This is a gesture that is reserved only for human/dog communication; a
dog will not do this with other dogs.
Ears: If a dog’s ears are raised, he is relaxed or listening. If they
are back, he might be signaling submission.
Tail: A recent study published in “Current Biology” shows that the way
a dog wags its tail indicates how he feels. If the tail wags more to
the right, it is a sign of positive feelings; left-side wagging
indicates negative feelings

<http://www.petinsurance.com/healthzone/pet-articles/pet-behavior/The-
Secret-Language-of-Dogs.aspx>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * *

Once again, I feel obliged to remind the group that trying to have a
human-style exchange with Witlessmongrel is pointless. If it's not the
uncontrolled yapping, it's the burying of key words that would render
the pooch's 'thoughts' comprehensible to humans.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Glanbrok > wrote:

> On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
>
> > > > I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
> > > > Witless's bark reflex.
> >
> > > Nope, they're from Albuquerque.
> >
> > > I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip****
> > > came along.
> >
> > Some people don't want their lives changed.
>
> Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico?

The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life.

It would have been a different movie if they'd played "Comfortably Numb"
instead of the Shins.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 15, 10:25*am, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *Glanbrok > wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
> > > > > I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
> > > > > Witless's bark reflex.
>
> > > > Nope, they're from Albuquerque.
>
> > > > I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip****
> > > > came along.
>
> > > Some people don't want their lives changed.
>
> > Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico?
>
> The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life.

Yes, she did. I forgot about her. Then again, didn't she have a
problem with lying?

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Mar 15, 10:25*am, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> > *Glanbrok > wrote:
> > > On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
> > > > > > Witless's bark reflex.
> >
> > > > > Nope, they're from Albuquerque.
> >
> > > > > I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip****
> > > > > came along.
> >
> > > > Some people don't want their lives changed.
> >
> > > Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico?
> >
> > The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life.
>
> Yes, she did. I forgot about her. Then again, didn't she have a
> problem with lying?

There was an identity problem as well:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manic_Pixie_Dream_Girl

"that bubbly, shallow cinematic creature that exists solely in the
fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly
soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and
adventures."

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 15, 12:37*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Boon > wrote:
> > On Mar 15, 10:25*am, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > >,
>
> > > *Glanbrok > wrote:
> > > > On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
> > > > > > > Witless's bark reflex.
>
> > > > > > Nope, they're from Albuquerque.
>
> > > > > > I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip****
> > > > > > came along.
>
> > > > > Some people don't want their lives changed.
>
> > > > Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico?
>
> > > The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life.
>
> > Yes, she did. I forgot about her. Then again, didn't she have a
> > problem with lying?
>
> There was an identity problem as well:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manic_Pixie_Dream_Girl
>
> "that bubbly, shallow cinematic creature that exists solely in the
> fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly
> soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and
> adventures."

That's funny. I never knew there was a name for them.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Mar 15, 12:37*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *Boon > wrote:
> > > On Mar 15, 10:25*am, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *Glanbrok > wrote:
> > > > > On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off
> > > > > > > > Witless's bark reflex.
> >
> > > > > > > Nope, they're from Albuquerque.
> >
> > > > > > > I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The
> > > > > > > Dip****
> > > > > > > came along.
> >
> > > > > > Some people don't want their lives changed.
> >
> > > > > Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New
> > > > > Mexico?
> >
> > > > The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life.
> >
> > > Yes, she did. I forgot about her. Then again, didn't she have a
> > > problem with lying?
> >
> > There was an identity problem as well:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manic_Pixie_Dream_Girl
> >
> > "that bubbly, shallow cinematic creature that exists solely in the
> > fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly
> > soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and
> > adventures."
>
> That's funny. I never knew there was a name for them.

Oddly enough, they seem to exist in real life, except for the benefiting
others part.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

Here's today's gem:

"I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all
the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some
bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the
booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)."

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon > wrote:
> Here's today's gem:
>
> "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all
> the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some
> bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the
> booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)."

Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to
score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to
easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the
game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to
something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to
not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too
"prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion.

If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one
actually almost made 2pid sound smart.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > Here's today's gem:
> >
> > "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all
> > the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some
> > bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the
> > booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)."
>
> Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to
> score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to
> easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the
> game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to
> something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to
> not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too
> "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion.
>
> If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one
> actually almost made 2pid sound smart.

Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball?

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 16, 6:06*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > Here's today's gem:
>
> > "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all
> > the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some
> > bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the
> > booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)."
>
> Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to
> score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to
> easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the
> game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to
> something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to
> not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too
> "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion.
>
> If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one
> actually almost made 2pid sound smart.

It's okay. He's to prolific so there will be more.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 16, 8:45*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > Here's today's gem:
>
> > > "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all
> > > the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some
> > > bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the
> > > booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)."
>
> > Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to
> > score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to
> > easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the
> > game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to
> > something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to
> > not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too
> > "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion.
>
> > If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one
> > actually almost made 2pid sound smart.
>
> Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball?

Not if there's a turnover.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Mar 16, 8:45*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > > Here's today's gem:
> >
> > > > "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all
> > > > the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some
> > > > bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the
> > > > booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)."
> >
> > > Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to
> > > score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to
> > > easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the
> > > game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to
> > > something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to
> > > not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too
> > > "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion.
> >
> > > If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one
> > > actually almost made 2pid sound smart.
> >
> > Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball?
>
> Not if there's a turnover.

Must be "defense puts the ball into play" or something, but I'd think
cricket does, too.

This gets dumber the more I think about it, so good enough for now.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 16, 8:45*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon > wrote:
> > > Here's today's gem:
>
> > > "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all
> > > the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some
> > > bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the
> > > booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)."
>
> > Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to
> > score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to
> > easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the
> > game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to
> > something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to
> > not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too
> > "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion.
>
> > If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one
> > actually almost made 2pid sound smart.
>
> Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball?

STFU. This is 2pid's scenario and he doesn't very well suffer his
"differing POV" being "oppressed".

You liberal POS. Next you'll claim that there's a health care crisis
in the US.

Next! LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 16, 11:54*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:

> This gets dumber the more I think about it, so good enough for now.

How dare you. LoL.

2pid is smarter than all of us combined. LoL.

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 16, 4:19*pm, Boon > wrote:

> Here's today's gem:
>
> "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all
> the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some
> bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the
> booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)."

Witless needs to cut back on the caffeine before his 'motor' burns
itself out.

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 16, 7:06*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:

> > "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all
> > the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some
> > bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the
> > booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)."

> If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one
> actually almost made 2pid sound smart.

Witless looooves "Heidi", you know.

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 16, 11:58*pm, Boon > wrote:

> > Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball?
>
> Not if there's a turnover.

mmmmm....Pastry!

[GeoSynch]

Pudge the Gimp minced:

>> > Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball?

> > Not if there's a turnover.

> mmmmm....Pastry!

.....drooled the Pudgester.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 17, 10:12*am, Glanbrok > wrote:
> On Mar 16, 11:58*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball?
>
> > Not if there's a turnover.
>
> mmmmm....Pastry!

Cherry or apple?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Jilly queried:

On Mar 17, 11:25*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Mar 17, 10:12*am, Glanbrok > wrote:
>
> > On Mar 16, 11:58*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > > Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball?
>
> > > Not if there's a turnover.
>
> > mmmmm....Pastry!
>
> Cherry or apple?

Does it matter, Buffoon?

(Sorry, I wanted to see how utterly brainless I felt after posting
like Sugar. I feel more stupid than I could have even imagined. Now to
set Sugar up for a typically boring "retort":

********

> I feel more stupid

It's OK, Jilly. We understand.

********

It's utterly amazing how little brainpower that exercise took. Sugar's
brain must be in mint condition with very few signs of use.

[GeoSynch]

Pudge: "Me want Pastry!:

BaBoon: "Me want banana!"

Jilly: "Me want smegma! LoL!"

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 17, 11:52*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> Jilly queried:
>
> On Mar 17, 11:25*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Mar 17, 10:12*am, Glanbrok > wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 16, 11:58*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > > > Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball?
>
> > > > Not if there's a turnover.
>
> > > mmmmm....Pastry!
>
> > Cherry or apple?
>
> Does it matter

That's right, Jilly. It doesn't matter if your belly is full of jism
and smegma, old girl.

You're right...it takes almost no brainpower!

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burped:

> You're right...it takes almost no brainpower!

That, as Martha Stewart would say, is a good thing, considering you haven't got
much of one left after endless years of swilling excitotoxin, aspartame-laced
diet soda.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 18, 12:30*am, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon burped:
>
> > You're right...it takes almost no brainpower!
>
> That, as Martha Stewart would say, is a good thing

LoL. Sugar tacitly admits that he's really quite stupid.

[GeoSynch]

Jilly jinked:

>> > You're right...it takes almost no brainpower!

> > That, as Martha Stewart would say, is a good thing

> LoL. Sugar tacitly admits that he's really quite stupid.

Come off it, old girl: we all know Pudge is the brains of your little operation.
Not much left in Buffoon's noggin after endless years of synaptically-frazzling
diet soda imbibement. And what little you had to start with has been
systematically scrubbed and reprogrammed through military MK-ULTRA mind control
techniques.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 18, 12:48*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Mar 18, 12:30*am, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > Buffoon burped:
>
> > > You're right...it takes almost no brainpower!
>
> > That, as Martha Stewart would say, is a good thing
>
> LoL.

Thanks for admitting that you find Martha Stewart's incarceration
humorous.

Wait, that's Arny. Let me try again.

Sure, GI Jilly, it would be a good thing if Martha Stewart's smegma
was dripping off your chin. Ready for seconds, old girl?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 18, 12:59*am, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Jilly jinked:
>
> >> > You're right...it takes almost no brainpower!
> > > That, as Martha Stewart would say, is a good thing
> > LoL. Sugar tacitly admits that he's really quite stupid.
>
> Come off it, old girl: we all know Pudge is the brains of your little operation.

Once you've admitted that there are no brains behind your own
operation all other points are moot.

[GeoSynch]

Jilly's jalopy ain't firing on all cylinders:

>> >> > You're right...it takes almost no brainpower!

> >> > That, as Martha Stewart would say, is a good thing

> > > LoL. Sugar tacitly admits that he's really quite stupid.

> > Come off it, old girl: we all know Pudge is the brains of your little
> > operation.

> Once you've admitted that there are no brains behind your own operation all
> other points are moot.

Feel free to giddily delude yourself by willfully misinterpreting what I wrote,
old girl.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 18, 3:18*am, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Jilly's jalopy ain't firing on all cylinders:
>
> >> >> > You're right...it takes almost no brainpower!
> > >> > That, as Martha Stewart would say, is a good thing
> > > > LoL. Sugar tacitly admits that he's really quite stupid.
> > > Come off it, old girl: we all know Pudge is the brains of your little
> > > operation.
> > Once you've admitted that there are no brains behind your own operation all
> > other points are moot.
>
> Feel free to giddily delude yourself by willfully misinterpreting what I wrote,
> old girl.

Your attempts at deflection have failed.

You admitted that you were brainless. I agree with you. We therefore
have nothing to argue about.

[GeoSynch]

Jilly squinted:

> > Feel free to giddily delude yourself by willfully misinterpreting what I
> > wrote, old girl.

> Your attempts at deflection have failed.

> You admitted that you were brainless. I agree with you. We therefore have
> nothing to argue about.

Jilly wistfully gazed across the horizon and myopically concluded the Earth was
flat.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 18, 4:53*am, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Jilly squinted:
>
> > > Feel free to giddily delude yourself by willfully misinterpreting what I
> > > wrote, old girl.
> > Your attempts at deflection have failed.
> > You admitted that you were brainless. I agree with you. We therefore have
> > nothing to argue about.
>
> Jilly wistfully gazed across the horizon and myopically concluded the Earth was
> flat.

How could I conclude otherwise with all that jism and smegma in my
eyes?

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 18, 12:25*am, Boon > wrote:

> > > Not if there's a turnover.
>
> > mmmmm....Pastry!
>
> Cherry or apple?

Well, since we've gotten Stynchblob interested in this conversational
byway, how about smegma?

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 18, 12:52*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>

> > > > Not if there's a turnover.
>
> > > mmmmm....Pastry!
>
> > Cherry or apple?
>
> Does it matter, Buffoon?
>
> (Sorry, I wanted to see how utterly brainless I felt after posting
> like Sugar. I feel more stupid than I could have even imagined. Now to
> set Sugar up for a typically boring "retort":

We have GOT to get a sample of Stynchie talking. I'm sure he lisps.

[Glanbrok[_2_]]

On Mar 18, 5:20*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>

> > > > Come off it, old girl: we all know Pudge is the brains of your little
> > > > operation.

Did anybody else wonder what kind of bizarre paranoid delusion
Stynchie was alluding to with that comment?

> Your attempts at deflection have failed.
>
> You admitted that you were brainless. I agree with you. We therefore
> have nothing to argue about.

Don't tell Scottie that!

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 18, 1:53*pm, Glanbrok > wrote:
> On Mar 18, 12:25*am, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > > Not if there's a turnover.
>
> > > mmmmm....Pastry!
>
> > Cherry or apple?
>
> Well, since we've gotten Stynchblob interested in this conversational
> byway, how about smegma?

PLF reminds me of an abused puppy at this point. "At least you're
paying attention to me!"

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 18, 1:57*pm, Glanbrok > wrote:
> On Mar 18, 5:20*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> >
>
> > > > > Come off it, old girl: we all know Pudge is the brains of your little
> > > > > operation.
>
> Did anybody else wonder what kind of bizarre paranoid delusion
> Stynchie was alluding to with that comment?
>
> > Your attempts at deflection have failed.
>
> > You admitted that you were brainless. I agree with you. We therefore
> > have nothing to argue about.
>
> Don't tell Scottie that!

I thought of the same thing. The Battle for RAO Punching Bag heats up.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burbled:

> PLF reminds me of an abused puppy at this point. "At least you're paying
> attention to me!"

Still smarting from all those shellackings, eh bumbling one?

I destroyed what little credibility you had posing as a journalist, repeatedly
pointed out your reeking hypocrisies and set in motion the chain of events that
led to your ouster from that rinky-dink publication you schlepped for and
subsequent relocation to Bumluck, TX.

Oh, the rich irony of your hubristic braggadocio antics (the FaceBook or MySpace
page and claims of 150,000 readers) that then spurred Arny and Bobo to launch
their offensive to 'take food off your table' was all deliciously exquisite.

But the icing on that cake was the seething BaBoon's futile attempt at seeking
revenge by thinking he'd gotten me fired from my job and then peeing himself
with glee about it on rao.

Yeah, it's no wonder you've turned into a bitter, old geezer faced with a
diminishing quality-of-life prospects.

Ain't schadenfreude grand? :-)

[GeoSynch]

Pudge the Gimp minced:

> We have GOT to get a sample of [GeoSynch The Greatest] talking.

Are they keeping you doped up in the nuthouse after your suicide attempt, 'lil
Georgie?

It would seem so, as your writing ability has fallen off a cliff.

[Boon[_2_]]

Shhh! has already tagged this one on the Chargers group, but I thought
I'd include it anyway:

"Only question is how much guaranteed money do they have locked up."

What does Scott mean?

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> Shhh! has already tagged this one on the Chargers group, but I thought
> I'd include it anyway:
>
> "Only question is how much guaranteed money do they have locked up."
>
> What does Scott mean?

Seems superfluous.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 19, 1:32*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *Boon > wrote:
> > Shhh! has already tagged this one on the Chargers group, but I thought
> > I'd include it anyway:
>
> > "Only question is how much guaranteed money do they have locked up."
>
> > What does Scott mean?
>
> Seems superfluous.

As is Scott's general existence on this planet. His wife does make
pretty flower arrangements, though.

[Boon[_2_]]

This week's entry:

I used to drink Lowenbrau when it was available for a reasonable
price (usually the swiss variety was more available than the German
(Munich if I recall) until Miller licensed US brewing rights and
killed all the other licensees imports by flooding the market with a
crappy version.

Here Scott tries to be ambitious by placing a parenthetical phrase
inside another parenthetical phrase, something I've only seen John
Kennedy O'Toole pull off successfully. If he just knew what the
bracket button on his keyboard was for, he might have matched O'Toole
(sadly, he doesn't [but then again the world would have been knocked
off its axis if he had]).

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 26, 9:07*pm, Boon > wrote:
> This week's entry:
>
> I used to drink Lowenbrau when it was available for a reasonable
> price (usually the swiss variety was more available than the German
> (Munich if I recall) until Miller licensed US brewing rights and
> killed all the other licensees imports by flooding the market with a
> crappy version.
>
> Here Scott tries to be ambitious by placing a parenthetical phrase
> inside another parenthetical phrase, something I've only seen John
> Kennedy O'Toole pull off successfully. If he just knew what the
> bracket button on his keyboard was for, he might have matched O'Toole
> (sadly, he doesn't [but then again the world would have been knocked
> off its axis if he had]).

I recall the first time I thought to myself he was an idiot (about
2pid, that is, because he had written another asinine post (it took me
several asinine posts by 2pid to realize that's how he WAS, not that
he'd made a couple of simple mistakes in his reasoning (I always give
people the benefit of the doubt (at least at first)))).

Pure art, I say!

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> This week's entry:
>
> I used to drink Lowenbrau when it was available for a reasonable
> price (usually the swiss variety was more available than the German
> (Munich if I recall) until Miller licensed US brewing rights and
> killed all the other licensees imports by flooding the market with a
> crappy version.
>
> Here Scott tries to be ambitious by placing a parenthetical phrase
> inside another parenthetical phrase, something I've only seen John
> Kennedy O'Toole pull off successfully. If he just knew what the
> bracket button on his keyboard was for, he might have matched O'Toole
> (sadly, he doesn't [but then again the world would have been knocked
> off its axis if he had]).

Keep your pants on! File clerks don't need brackets.

Stephen

[GeoSynch]

Jilly beamed:

> I recall the first time ...

> Pure art, I say!

More like sackmanure as recursive cursives just ain't your bag. old girl ... so
to speak.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Mar 26, 9:42*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Mar 26, 9:07*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > This week's entry:
>
> > I used to drink Lowenbrau when it was available for a reasonable
> > price (usually the swiss variety was more available than the German
> > (Munich if I recall) until Miller licensed US brewing rights and
> > killed all the other licensees imports by flooding the market with a
> > crappy version.
>
> > Here Scott tries to be ambitious by placing a parenthetical phrase
> > inside another parenthetical phrase, something I've only seen John
> > Kennedy O'Toole pull off successfully. If he just knew what the
> > bracket button on his keyboard was for, he might have matched O'Toole
> > (sadly, he doesn't [but then again the world would have been knocked
> > off its axis if he had]).
>
> I recall the first time I thought to myself he was an idiot (about
> 2pid, that is, because he had written another asinine post (it took me
> several asinine posts by 2pid to realize that's how he WAS, not that
> he'd made a couple of simple mistakes in his reasoning (I always give
> people the benefit of the doubt (at least at first)))).
>
> Pure art, I say!

I would agree (although somewhat reluctantly [since RAO is full of
people {Scott, PLF, Bret, Lionel} who wouldn't otherwise has an active
audience for their nonsense.]) I was able to endure Scott's RAO posts
for a long time (by simply ignoring them [which wasn't easy since I
had so many people emailing me {such as George |who couldn't believe I
went to his house and hung out with him|}]), but after a while it
bothered me that the majority of the activity on RAO was good people
trying to deal with his bad behavior.