Middiot

[Gary Eickmeier]

OK, the last he posted was Christmas eve. Anyone know what is going on?

Gary Eickmeier

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 23, 8:41*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> OK, the last he posted was Christmas eve. Anyone know what is going on?
>
> Gary Eickmeier

Why do you care?

According to some he drove people off. Now you come back because you
miss him.

Make up your mind.

[Bret L]

> 1. George Middius has been posting here since Christ was a corporal.
>
> 2. He hasn't posted since Christmas eve.
>
> 3. Does anyone know what is going on?
>
> Gary Eickmeier

No, but based on the way he constantly wished death on certain
people, I'd have to say karma might have run over his dogma.

[Gary Eickmeier]

"Bret L" > wrote in message
...
>
>> 1. George Middius has been posting here since Christ was a corporal.
>>
>> 2. He hasn't posted since Christmas eve.
>>
>> 3. Does anyone know what is going on?
>>
>> Gary Eickmeier
>
> No, but based on the way he constantly wished death on certain
> people, I'd have to say karma might have run over his dogma.

He has indeed been the main reason for the deterioration of this group. I
quit reading it several years ago, because there was no point in trying to
discuss anything substantive. I always thought that with Zip gone, if we
could just get rid of Middius we could regain this as an audio group that we
could post freely without moderators or harrassment.

It is also interesting that if a loner dies, there would be no way to know
what happened, and he would just stop posting. I highly doubt that he has
just taken a new identity. We could tell his posts a mile away.

Gary Eickmeier

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 24, 10:41*am, "Gary Eickmeier" >
wrote:

> He has indeed been the main reason for the deterioration of this group. I
> quit reading it several years ago, because there was no point in trying to
> discuss anything substantive. I always thought that with Zip gone, if we
> could just get rid of Middius we could regain this as an audio group that we
> could post freely without moderators or harrassment.

Call the gang up and chack out your theory.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 24, 10:41*am, "Gary Eickmeier" >
wrote:
> "Bret L" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
> >> 1. George Middius has been posting here since Christ was a corporal.
>
> >> 2. He hasn't posted since Christmas eve.
>
> >> 3. Does anyone know what is going on?
>
> >> Gary Eickmeier
>
> > No, but based on the way he constantly wished death on certain
> > people, I'd have to say karma might have run over his dogma.
>
> He has indeed been the main reason for the deterioration of this group. I
> quit reading it several years ago, because there was no point in trying to
> discuss anything substantive. I always thought that with Zip gone, if we
> could just get rid of Middius we could regain this as an audio group that we
> could post freely without moderators or harrassment.
>
> It is also interesting that if a loner dies, there would be no way to know
> what happened, and he would just stop posting. I highly doubt that he has
> just taken a new identity. We could tell his posts a mile away.

1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this group.

2. George is not a loner.

3. If you look at his last couple of posts, you'll see the reason why
hasn't posted in a while.

4. It's been less than a month. George has taken breaks before without
everyone wringing their hands. Everyone takes breaks. It's normal
behavior.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
"Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:

> "Bret L" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >> 1. George Middius has been posting here since Christ was a corporal.
> >>
> >> 2. He hasn't posted since Christmas eve.
> >>
> >> 3. Does anyone know what is going on?
> >>
> >> Gary Eickmeier
> >
> > No, but based on the way he constantly wished death on certain
> > people, I'd have to say karma might have run over his dogma.
>
> He has indeed been the main reason for the deterioration of this group. I
> quit reading it several years ago, because there was no point in trying to
> discuss anything substantive. I always thought that with Zip gone, if we
> could just get rid of Middius we could regain this as an audio group that we
> could post freely without moderators or harrassment.
>
> It is also interesting that if a loner dies, there would be no way to know
> what happened, and he would just stop posting. I highly doubt that he has
> just taken a new identity. We could tell his posts a mile away.

Or you could ignore him of your own freewill.

Stephen

[Gary Eickmeier]

"MiNe 109" > wrote in message
...

> Or you could ignore him of your own freewill.
>
> Stephen

Great idea, but you can't do it if anyone else is responding to him. If we
ALL ignored him as if he didn't exist, he might fade away. I tried that
suggestion many years ago. Not possible.

Gary Eickmeier

[Anon E Mouse]

Et que tous les animaux nécrophages de la planète éliminent cette odeur
putride qui émane de sa carcasse en décomposition.

Gary Eickmeier > schrieb in Nachricht >...

> "Bret L" > wrote in message ...
> >>
> >> 1. George Middius has been posting here since Christ was a corporal.
> >>
> >> 2. He hasn't posted since Christmas eve.
> >>
> >> 3. Does anyone know what is going on?
> >>
> >> Gary Eickmeier
> >
> > No, but based on the way he constantly wished death on certain
> > people, I'd have to say karma might have run over his dogma.
>
> He has indeed been the main reason for the deterioration of this group. I
> quit reading it several years ago, because there was no point in trying to
> discuss anything substantive. I always thought that with Zip gone, if we
> could just get rid of Middius we could regain this as an audio group that we
> could post freely without moderators or harrassment.

And seeing your posts cancelled, thanks to the Mad Mouse who petitioned
remailer operators to no longer upload or relay cancel messages on Usenet
(with most Usenet servers/newsgroup service providers today doing the same).


> It is also interesting that if a loner dies, there would be no way to know
> what happened, and he would just stop posting. I highly doubt that he has
> just taken a new identity. We could tell his posts a mile away.

You've been fooled quite a few times by his mascarading...

TTFN
--
Anon E. Mouse

[Playing] "The Great Gate at Kiev" Mussorgsky - Pictures at an Exhibition
(Guillou, organ)

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
"Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:

> "MiNe 109" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> > Or you could ignore him of your own freewill.
> >
> > Stephen
>
> Great idea, but you can't do it if anyone else is responding to him. If we
> ALL ignored him as if he didn't exist, he might fade away. I tried that
> suggestion many years ago. Not possible.

Really? I don't have extraordinary powers of concentration and I have no
problem ignoring people, especially if they're in my killfile.

This 'really?' business is starting to get stale. Maybe I'll spice it up
with 'seriously?'

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
"Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:

> 1. What has Arny done to anyone?

If you can't tell yourself, no one can possibly tell you.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 24, 6:59*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> "MiNe 109" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > Or you could ignore him of your own freewill.
>
> > Stephen
>
> Great idea, but you can't do it if anyone else is responding to him. If we
> ALL ignored him as if he didn't exist, he might fade away. I tried that
> suggestion many years ago. Not possible.
>
> Gary Eickmeier

No, because more people like him than not around here.

[Gary Eickmeier]

I think maybe this group is just a nut house with or without Middiot.

Gary Eickmeier

"Anon E Mouse" > wrote in message
...
>
> Et que tous les animaux nécrophages de la planète éliminent cette odeur
> putride qui émane de sa carcasse en décomposition.
>
> Gary Eickmeier > schrieb in Nachricht
> >...
>
>> "Bret L" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >>
>> >> 1. George Middius has been posting here since Christ was a corporal.
>> >>
>> >> 2. He hasn't posted since Christmas eve.
>> >>
>> >> 3. Does anyone know what is going on?
>> >>
>> >> Gary Eickmeier
>> >
>> > No, but based on the way he constantly wished death on certain
>> > people, I'd have to say karma might have run over his dogma.
>>
>> He has indeed been the main reason for the deterioration of this group. I
>> quit reading it several years ago, because there was no point in trying
>> to
>> discuss anything substantive. I always thought that with Zip gone, if we
>> could just get rid of Middius we could regain this as an audio group that
>> we
>> could post freely without moderators or harrassment.
>
> And seeing your posts cancelled, thanks to the Mad Mouse who petitioned
> remailer operators to no longer upload or relay cancel messages on Usenet
> (with most Usenet servers/newsgroup service providers today doing the
> same).
>
>
>> It is also interesting that if a loner dies, there would be no way to
>> know
>> what happened, and he would just stop posting. I highly doubt that he has
>> just taken a new identity. We could tell his posts a mile away.
>
> You've been fooled quite a few times by his mascarading...
>
> TTFN
> --
> Anon E. Mouse
>
> [Playing] "The Great Gate at Kiev" Mussorgsky - Pictures at an
> Exhibition
> (Guillou, organ)
>
>
>
>

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 24, 11:11*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" >
wrote:
> I think maybe this group is just a nut house with or without Middiot.

Interesting that you and Ferstler feel the need to keep coming back.

Why is that?

[Iain Churches[_2_]]

"Boon" > wrote in message
...
On Jan 24, 7:04 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this group.

Agreed.

[none]

Gary Eickmeier a écrit :
> OK, the last he posted was Christmas eve. Anyone know what is going on?

A miracle...

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 24, 11:11*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" >
wrote:
> I think maybe this group is just a nut house with or without Middiot.

Then stop whining and leave already.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 25, 2:41*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 12:09*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 25, 12:10*am, "Gary Eickmeier" >
> > wrote:
>
> > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in ....
> > > On Jan 24, 11:11 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > I think maybe this group is just a nut house with or without Middiot.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 25, 2:42*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 11:47*am, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Jan 24, 11:11*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" >
> > wrote:
>
> > > I think maybe this group is just a nut house with or without Middiot.
>
> > Then stop whining and leave already.
>
> *RAO spam cop spamming noted.

You mean you have to be in law enforcement to tell people to stop
whining? I didn't know that.

Then again, much of what you say makes absolutely no sense. I really
can't believe you're an engineer. I think Jayna probably just comes
from a rich family.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 25, 4:07*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 1:25*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Jan 25, 2:42*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 25, 11:47*am, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 24, 11:11*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" >
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > I think maybe this group is just a nut house with or without Middiot.
>
> > > > Then stop whining and leave already.
>
> > > *RAO spam cop spamming noted.
>
> > You mean you have to be in law enforcement to tell people to stop
> > whining? I didn't know that.
>
> *Actually it was the "leave already" whining I was referrring to.
> *You should stop it.

Why? He doesn't have to do what I say, and I have no authority here
(nor have I ever claimed that I did). Apparently you think I do, or
you wouldn't bring up such dumb points.

>
>
>
> > Then again, much of what you say makes absolutely no sense.
>
> *To a boring texas redneck like you with a wife who strays...I'm not
> surprised.

Oh, please. That's about as inaccurate of a desciption you could come
up with. You're the guy with the mullet. You exemplify redneck with
your politics as well.

And you're the one with a wife who rolls her eyes at you while winking
at men she just met. That's a strayer right there. Oh, and I just saw
a recent pic of her...she's definitely hit the wall. Life with you can
certainly age a woman.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 25, 9:46*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 4:34*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 25, 6:17*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 25, 3:20*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 25, 4:07*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jan 25, 1:25*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jan 25, 2:42*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jan 25, 11:47*am, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jan 24, 11:11*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > I think maybe this group is just a nut house with or without Middiot.
>
> > > > > > > > Then stop whining and leave already.
>
> > > > > > > *RAO spam cop spamming noted.
>
> > > > > > You mean you have to be in law enforcement to tell people to stop
> > > > > > whining? I didn't know that.
>
> > > > > *Actually it was the "leave already" whining I was referrring to.
> > > > > *You should stop it.
>
> > > > Why? He doesn't have to do what I say,
>
> > > *Best advice I've ever heard from you.
>
> > What? You need to be told that you don't have to do what other people
> > tell you? Are you really that gullible?
>
> *Another good point.
>
> Anyone who listens to Boon is gullible. *You're full of pearls of
> wisdom today.

Wow, You have nothing to say, and you just keep on talking. A real man
would know when to walk away after losing an argument.Then again, if
you were a real man, Jayna wouldn't be constantly rolling here eyes at
you when your back is turned.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 25, 10:34*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 8:30*pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > Buffoon recounted:
>
> > > After Arny and Scott were gone, George commented that he really missed making
> > > fun of them. RAO had simply become boring for him.
> > > It's not rocket science.
>
> > You drove them off. George killed himself. Nice work, Boonie.
>
> Hey, what are friends for? *LoL.

So you honestly believe George killed himself? My, you are gullible,
aren't you.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 25, 10:54*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 8:40*pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > ScottW wrote:
> > >> > After Arny and Scott were gone, George commented that he really missed
> > >> > making fun of them. RAO had simply become boring for him.
> > >> > It's not rocket science.
> > > > You drove them off. George killed himself. Nice work, Boonie.
> > > Hey, what are friends for? *LoL.
>
> > No doubt Dorgay and the rest of the staff at TONE Audio heaved a big sigh of
> > relief when Boonie packed it in and moved down yonder.
>
> Hard to live up to his bio, "best burger schlepper they ever had",
> from halfway across the country. *They clipped that one pretty quick.

Probably because it never existed. Another lie on your part.

>
> *He's probably schlepping for his new hangout, Hays County Adult
> Probation Center.

While I have a minor in psychology, I haven't worked in the field
since shortly after graduation.

In other words, you lied again.

Is Jayna schlepping burgers for the San Diego County Flower and Plant
Association? Is that where you got the idea for this lie?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 25, 11:34*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 9:09*pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > ScottW wrote:
> > > > No doubt Dorgay and the rest of the staff at TONE Audio heaved a big sigh of
> > > > relief when Boonie packed it in and moved down yonder.
> > > Hard to live up to his bio, "best burger schlepper they ever had", from
> > > halfway across the country. *They clipped that one pretty quick.
> > > He's probably schlepping for his new hangout, Hays County Adult Probation
> > > Center.
>
> > What's he do? Fetch cheap lunches for the probationers and staff?
>
> * That was his bio at Tone.

That would be a lie.

>Maybe he's moving up in the world.

Since I've owned my own business since June 2006, you could say that.
That's the first thing you've said today that wasn't a lie.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 26, 11:13*am, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 26, 8:44*am, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 25, 11:34*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 25, 9:09*pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > > > ScottW wrote:
> > > > > > No doubt Dorgay and the rest of the staff at TONE Audio heaved a big sigh of
> > > > > > relief when Boonie packed it in and moved down yonder.
> > > > > Hard to live up to his bio, "best burger schlepper they ever had", from
> > > > > halfway across the country. *They clipped that one pretty quick..
> > > > > He's probably schlepping for his new hangout, Hays County Adult Probation
> > > > > Center.
>
> > > > What's he do? Fetch cheap lunches for the probationers and staff?
>
> > > * That was his bio at Tone.
>
> > That would be a lie.
>
> *I'm sure you have a framed copy of your bio.
> Why not post it and we see what your claim to fame was?
>
>
>
> > >Maybe he's moving up in the world.
>
> > Since I've owned my own business since June 2006,
>
> * Who was it that said since you haven't proved that it is a lie?
> *Oh yeah...you did. *LoL.

No, I didn't. But back in 2006, I discussed it with you in person.
Your response was that I'd be ruined for life in terms of working for
anyone else. I guess that's important to a meek, unadventurous guy
like yourself...the ability to work for someone else.

In other words, you're conveniently trotting this challenge out now
despite the fact that you've already proven me right. You lose.

>
> So how is Andy Willowby's, "How the heck are ya?" 3 steps working for
> you anyway?

I have no idea who Andy Willowby is. Perhaps you could brief me based
upon your own experiences with the program.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 25, 10:34*pm, ScottW > wrote:

> Hey, what are friends for? *LoL.

I wonder why 2pid "LoL"s here and not on the Chargers group. LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 25, 2:42*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 11:47*am, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Jan 24, 11:11*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" >
> > wrote:
>
> > > I think maybe this group is just a nut house with or without Middiot.
>
> > Then stop whining and leave already.
>
> *RAO spam cop spamming noted.

If it bothers you then leave. LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 25, 4:07*pm, ScottW > wrote:

> *Actually it was the "leave already" whining I was referrring to.
> *You should stop it.

RAO spam cop spamming noted.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 26, 7:45*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 4:07*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > *Actually it was the "leave already" whining I was referrring to.
> > *You should stop it.
>
> RAO spam cop spamming noted.

Hypocritical babbling noted, too.

[none]

Iain Churches a écrit :
> "Boon" > wrote in message
> ...
> On Jan 24, 7:04 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this group.
>
> Agreed.

Agreed too.
....He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:

> Iain Churches a écrit :
> > "Boon" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > On Jan 24, 7:04 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this group.
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> Agreed too.
> ...He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)

Shouldn't you be in mourning for Mick Green?

Stephen

[none]

MiNe 109 a écrit :
> In article >,
> none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:
>
>> Iain Churches a écrit :
>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> On Jan 24, 7:04 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this group.
>>> Agreed.
>> Agreed too.
>> ...He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)
>
> Shouldn't you be in mourning for Mick Green?
>
> Stephen

**** I didn't know about Mick Green death.

Stephen, you have an astonishing memory.
You remember this thread in which Jenn asked for the best rock'n'roll
guitar solo. I propose her a solo from Wilko Johnson and she found it a
little bit too "simplist" !!!!
Why to ask about rock'n'roll if one doesn't have even a little idea of
what it is ? :-D

Parcel tray and glove box in my car are always full of Feelgood,
Vincent, Cochran and Taylor's CDs.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:

> MiNe 109 a écrit :
> > In article >,
> > none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:
> >
> >> Iain Churches a écrit :
> >>> "Boon" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>> On Jan 24, 7:04 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this group.
> >>> Agreed.
> >> Agreed too.
> >> ...He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)
> >
> > Shouldn't you be in mourning for Mick Green?
> >
> > Stephen
>
> **** I didn't know about Mick Green death.
>
> Stephen, you have an astonishing memory.
> You remember this thread in which Jenn asked for the best rock'n'roll
> guitar solo. I propose her a solo from Wilko Johnson and she found it a
> little bit too "simplist" !!!!

I remember because I actually followed the links to hear the solos!

> Why to ask about rock'n'roll if one doesn't have even a little idea of
> what it is ? :-D

It could be worse: there's a guy on the UK group who worships Jeff Beck.

> Parcel tray and glove box in my car are always full of Feelgood,
> Vincent, Cochran and Taylor's CDs.

I only know about Taylor because of the Clash. He's practically unknown
in the US. I was biased against pub-rock because I'd heard too many
boring Brinsley Schwarz records, but I'm changing my mind about Dr
Feelgood, Steve Gibbons and the Pirates.

Stephen

[Lionel[_8_]]

MiNe 109 a écrit :
> In article >,
> none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:
>
>> MiNe 109 a écrit :
>>> In article >,
>>> none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Iain Churches a écrit :
>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>> On Jan 24, 7:04 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this group.
>>>>> Agreed.
>>>> Agreed too.
>>>> ...He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)
>>> Shouldn't you be in mourning for Mick Green?
>>>
>>> Stephen
>> **** I didn't know about Mick Green death.
>>
>> Stephen, you have an astonishing memory.
>> You remember this thread in which Jenn asked for the best rock'n'roll
>> guitar solo. I propose her a solo from Wilko Johnson and she found it a
>> little bit too "simplist" !!!!
>
> I remember because I actually followed the links to hear the solos!

Better "être" than "paraître"

>> Why to ask about rock'n'roll if one doesn't have even a little idea of
>> what it is ? :-D
>
> It could be worse: there's a guy on the UK group who worships Jeff Beck.

Oh please don't drag me into this direction.
I sincerely appreciate Jeff Beck ! But after what I've written just
above I imagine that I will have a lot of difficulties to justify and
explain you my taste.
Let me try that Jeff Beck is a rocker who don't really play R'n'R.
I mean if you ask me for some good guitarists I like, without any doubts
I will speak about Jeff Beck but on the other hand I would never have
the idea to answer with his name to Jenn's request.
A bit complicate no ?

>> Parcel tray and glove box in my car are always full of Feelgood,
>> Vincent, Cochran and Taylor's CDs.
>
> I only know about Taylor because of the Clash. He's practically unknown
> in the US. I was biased against pub-rock because I'd heard too many
> boring Brinsley Schwarz records, but I'm changing my mind about Dr
> Feelgood, Steve Gibbons and the Pirates.

Down by the Jetty, Malpratice and the live album Stupidity are my
prefered Feegood's disks for the '70s period.
More recently "Chess Masters" is a collection of incredibly powerful
standard rocks with top quality sound. Put it in you car CD and it will
stay for months.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> MiNe 109 a écrit :
> > In article >,
> > none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:
> >
> >> MiNe 109 a écrit :
> >>> In article >,
> >>> none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Iain Churches a écrit :
> >>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
> >>>>> ..
> >>>>> .
> >>>>> On Jan 24, 7:04 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> >>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> .
> >>>>>> ..
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this group.
> >>>>> Agreed.
> >>>> Agreed too.
> >>>> ...He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)
> >>> Shouldn't you be in mourning for Mick Green?
> >>>
> >>> Stephen
> >> **** I didn't know about Mick Green death.
> >>
> >> Stephen, you have an astonishing memory.
> >> You remember this thread in which Jenn asked for the best rock'n'roll
> >> guitar solo. I propose her a solo from Wilko Johnson and she found it a
> >> little bit too "simplist" !!!!
> >
> > I remember because I actually followed the links to hear the solos!
>
> Better "être" than "paraître"
>
> >> Why to ask about rock'n'roll if one doesn't have even a little idea of
> >> what it is ? :-D
> >
> > It could be worse: there's a guy on the UK group who worships Jeff Beck.
>
> Oh please don't drag me into this direction.
> I sincerely appreciate Jeff Beck ! But after what I've written just
> above I imagine that I will have a lot of difficulties to justify and
> explain you my taste.
> Let me try that Jeff Beck is a rocker who don't really play R'n'R.
> I mean if you ask me for some good guitarists I like, without any doubts
> I will speak about Jeff Beck but on the other hand I would never have
> the idea to answer with his name to Jenn's request.
> A bit complicate no ?

No problem. I don't really dislike Jeff Beck but some of my friends did
because he wasn't Jimmy Page.

> >> Parcel tray and glove box in my car are always full of Feelgood,
> >> Vincent, Cochran and Taylor's CDs.
> >
> > I only know about Taylor because of the Clash. He's practically unknown
> > in the US. I was biased against pub-rock because I'd heard too many
> > boring Brinsley Schwarz records, but I'm changing my mind about Dr
> > Feelgood, Steve Gibbons and the Pirates.
>
> Down by the Jetty, Malpratice and the live album Stupidity are my
> prefered Feegood's disks for the '70s period.
> More recently "Chess Masters" is a collection of incredibly powerful
> standard rocks with top quality sound. Put it in you car CD and it will
> stay for months.

I'll watch for it.

Stephen

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:

> MiNe 109 a écrit :
> > In article >,
> > none <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote:
> >
> >> Iain Churches a écrit :
> >>> "Boon" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>> On Jan 24, 7:04 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this group.
> >>> Agreed.
> >> Agreed too.
> >> ...He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)
> >
> > Shouldn't you be in mourning for Mick Green?
> >
> > Stephen
>
> **** I didn't know about Mick Green death.
>
> Stephen, you have an astonishing memory.
> You remember this thread in which Jenn asked for the best rock'n'roll
> guitar solo. I propose her a solo from Wilko Johnson and she found it a
> little bit too "simplist" !!!!

Actually, that's not what I wrote at all. I LIKE simple. What I said
was that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".

> Why to ask about rock'n'roll if one doesn't have even a little idea of
> what it is ? :-D

Why quote something that you evidently didn't read? ;-)

[Glanbrok]

Yo, Stephen. Get a $(*% grip.

> I'll watch for it.

Why are you posting about music in my thread? (Thanks for the shout-
out, Bosey.)

And an even more poignant question: Why are you enabling Lionella?
Have you forgotten Slut's intractable case of Kroopologism?

Everybody else, please take your non-Middius comments to an
appropriate thread. This one is MINE! (No pun intended, since I don't
know what "MiNe" means.


--

Ding-dong, the Beast is dead
Krooger tried to eat his own head
Now Bosey has a hard-on for me
He trolls and trolls so merrily
But Scottiedog is gone, off chasing his stick
So RAO can revert to talk of mu-sic.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Glanbrok > wrote:

> Yo, Stephen. Get a $(*% grip.
>
> > I'll watch for it.
>
> Why are you posting about music in my thread? (Thanks for the shout-
> out, Bosey.)
>
> And an even more poignant question: Why are you enabling Lionella?
> Have you forgotten Slut's intractable case of Kroopologism?

Yes, who can forget Lionel and the Kroo slamming pints and discussing
the fine points of pub rock such as the relative merits of Dr Feelgood
lead guitarists or Rockpile songwriters.

> Everybody else, please take your non-Middius comments to an
> appropriate thread. This one is MINE! (No pun intended, since I don't
> know what "MiNe" means.

It has a meaning but it's kind of dull.

Stephen

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message


> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of this
> group.

So I stopped posting here, and it perked right up. Not!

[Arny Krueger]

"none" <""lionel\"@(none)"> wrote in message

> Iain Churches a écrit :
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> On Jan 24, 7:04 pm, "Gary Eickmeier"
>> > wrote:
>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> 1. Arny was the main reason for the deterioration of
>>> this group.
>>
>> Agreed.
>
> Agreed too.

> ...He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)

This is probably true. If memory serves, Zippy asked the Middiot to help him
out when his lies on RAO started getting the better of him.

[Arny Krueger]

"GeoSynch" > wrote in message

> ScottW wrote:
>
>>>> After Arny and Scott were gone, George commented that
>>>> he really missed making fun of them. RAO had simply
>>>> become boring for him.
>
>>>> It's not rocket science.
>
>>> You drove them off. George killed himself. Nice work,
>>> Boonie.
>
>> Hey, what are friends for? LoL.
>
> No doubt Dorgay and the rest of the staff at TONE Audio
> heaved a big sigh of relief when Boonie packed it in and
> moved down yonder.

Now that improves my opinion of Dorgay, lots!

[Lionel[_8_]]

Jenn a écrit :

>> too "simplist" !!!!
>
>that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".

The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
more than hair-splitting.
You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
always return to hair-splitting. :-(

[Lionel[_8_]]

Glanbrok a écrit :
> Yo, Stephen. Get a $(*% grip.
>
>> I'll watch for it.
>
> Why are you posting about music in my thread? (Thanks for the shout-
> out, Bosey.)
>
> And an even more poignant question: Why are you enabling Lionella?
> Have you forgotten Slut's intractable case of Kroopologism?

:-D !!!!
George is so predictable... I really don't understand the fascination he
exerted on RAO.
By his intransigence and lack of empathy he has protected and given a
shelter to a bunch of moronic cry-babies that have bring more trouble on
RAO than Kruger himself.

[Lionel[_8_]]

MiNe 109 a écrit :
> slamming pints and discussing
> the fine points of pub rock such as the relative merits of Dr Feelgood
> lead guitarists or Rockpile songwriters.

I sincerely doubt that George has ever slamming pints.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Arny Krueger a écrit :

> This is probably true.

If you sincerely have any idea of what true is about, you would
immediately stop to post on this group.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> Jenn a écrit :
>
> >> too "simplist" !!!!
> >
> >that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".
>
> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> more than hair-splitting.
> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
> always return to hair-splitting. :-(

What "hair-splitting"? I didn't say that the solo was too simplistic,
because I don't think that it was. Seems pretty clear to me. Unless,
of course, you believe that simple solos can't be imaginative. I
certainly don't believe that to be the truth.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Jenn a écrit :
> In article >,
> Lionel > wrote:
>
>> Jenn a écrit :
>>
>>>> too "simplist" !!!!
>>> that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".
>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
>> more than hair-splitting.
>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
>> always return to hair-splitting. :-(
>
> What "hair-splitting"? I didn't say that the solo was too simplistic,
> because I don't think that it was. Seems pretty clear to me. Unless,
> of course, you believe that simple solos can't be imaginative. I
> certainly don't believe that to be the truth.

I'm a simple mind, I only believe what mainstream media teld me :

http://www.answers.com/topic/unimaginative
1. Lacking originality: sterile, uncreative, uninspired, uninventive,
unoriginal. See rich/poor.
2. Lacking liveliness, charm, or surprise: arid, aseptic, colorless,
drab, dry, dull, earthbound, flat, flavorless, lackluster, lifeless,
lusterless, matter-of-fact, pedestrian, prosaic, spiritless, sterile,
stodgy, uninspired. See excite/bore/interest."

unimaginativeunimaginative - deficient in originality or creativity;
lacking powers of invention; "a sterile ideology lacking in
originality"; "unimaginative development of a musical theme";
"uninspired writing"

unimaginative - lacking spontaneity or originality or individuality;
"stereotyped phrases of condolence"; "even his profanity was unimaginative"
stereotyped, stereotypic, stereotypical
conventional - unimaginative and conformist; "conventional bourgeois
lives"; "conventional attitudes"

The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
more than hair-splitting.
You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
always return to hair-splitting.
Zzzzz....

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> Jenn a écrit :
> > In article >,
> > Lionel > wrote:
> >
> >> Jenn a écrit :
> >>
> >>>> too "simplist" !!!!
> >>> that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".
> >> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> >> more than hair-splitting.
> >> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
> >> always return to hair-splitting. :-(
> >
> > What "hair-splitting"? I didn't say that the solo was too simplistic,
> > because I don't think that it was. Seems pretty clear to me. Unless,
> > of course, you believe that simple solos can't be imaginative. I
> > certainly don't believe that to be the truth.
>
> I'm a simple mind, I only believe what mainstream media teld me :
>
> http://www.answers.com/topic/unimaginative
> 1. Lacking originality: sterile, uncreative, uninspired, uninventive,
> unoriginal. See rich/poor.
> 2. Lacking liveliness, charm, or surprise: arid, aseptic, colorless,
> drab, dry, dull, earthbound, flat, flavorless, lackluster, lifeless,
> lusterless, matter-of-fact, pedestrian, prosaic, spiritless, sterile,
> stodgy, uninspired. See excite/bore/interest."
>
> unimaginativeunimaginative - deficient in originality or creativity;
> lacking powers of invention; "a sterile ideology lacking in
> originality"; "unimaginative development of a musical theme";
> "uninspired writing"
>
> unimaginative - lacking spontaneity or originality or individuality;
> "stereotyped phrases of condolence"; "even his profanity was unimaginative"
> stereotyped, stereotypic, stereotypical
> conventional - unimaginative and conformist; "conventional bourgeois
> lives"; "conventional attitudes"
>
> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> more than hair-splitting.
> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
> always return to hair-splitting.
> Zzzzz....

I'm sorry; I'm unable to discern your train of thought.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Jenn a écrit :
> In article >,
> Lionel > wrote:
>
>> Jenn a écrit :
>>> In article >,
>>> Lionel > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jenn a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>> too "simplist" !!!!
>>>>> that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".
>>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
>>>> more than hair-splitting.
>>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
>>>> always return to hair-splitting. :-(
>>> What "hair-splitting"? I didn't say that the solo was too simplistic,
>>> because I don't think that it was. Seems pretty clear to me. Unless,
>>> of course, you believe that simple solos can't be imaginative. I
>>> certainly don't believe that to be the truth.
>> I'm a simple mind, I only believe what mainstream media teld me :
>>
>> http://www.answers.com/topic/unimaginative
>> 1. Lacking originality: sterile, uncreative, uninspired, uninventive,
>> unoriginal. See rich/poor.
>> 2. Lacking liveliness, charm, or surprise: arid, aseptic, colorless,
>> drab, dry, dull, earthbound, flat, flavorless, lackluster, lifeless,
>> lusterless, matter-of-fact, pedestrian, prosaic, spiritless, sterile,
>> stodgy, uninspired. See excite/bore/interest."
>>
>> unimaginativeunimaginative - deficient in originality or creativity;
>> lacking powers of invention; "a sterile ideology lacking in
>> originality"; "unimaginative development of a musical theme";
>> "uninspired writing"
>>
>> unimaginative - lacking spontaneity or originality or individuality;
>> "stereotyped phrases of condolence"; "even his profanity was unimaginative"
>> stereotyped, stereotypic, stereotypical
>> conventional - unimaginative and conformist; "conventional bourgeois
>> lives"; "conventional attitudes"
>>
>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
>> more than hair-splitting.
>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
>> always return to hair-splitting.
>> Zzzzz....
>
> I'm sorry; I'm unable to discern your train of thought.

No surprise , I'm not hair-splitting ! :-)

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> Jenn a écrit :
> > In article >,
> > Lionel > wrote:
> >
> >> Jenn a écrit :
> >>> In article >,
> >>> Lionel > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Jenn a écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>>>> too "simplist" !!!!
> >>>>> that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".
> >>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> >>>> more than hair-splitting.
> >>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
> >>>> always return to hair-splitting. :-(
> >>> What "hair-splitting"? I didn't say that the solo was too simplistic,
> >>> because I don't think that it was. Seems pretty clear to me. Unless,
> >>> of course, you believe that simple solos can't be imaginative. I
> >>> certainly don't believe that to be the truth.
> >> I'm a simple mind, I only believe what mainstream media teld me :
> >>
> >> http://www.answers.com/topic/unimaginative
> >> 1. Lacking originality: sterile, uncreative, uninspired, uninventive,
> >> unoriginal. See rich/poor.
> >> 2. Lacking liveliness, charm, or surprise: arid, aseptic, colorless,
> >> drab, dry, dull, earthbound, flat, flavorless, lackluster, lifeless,
> >> lusterless, matter-of-fact, pedestrian, prosaic, spiritless, sterile,
> >> stodgy, uninspired. See excite/bore/interest."
> >>
> >> unimaginativeunimaginative - deficient in originality or creativity;
> >> lacking powers of invention; "a sterile ideology lacking in
> >> originality"; "unimaginative development of a musical theme";
> >> "uninspired writing"
> >>
> >> unimaginative - lacking spontaneity or originality or individuality;
> >> "stereotyped phrases of condolence"; "even his profanity was unimaginative"
> >> stereotyped, stereotypic, stereotypical
> >> conventional - unimaginative and conformist; "conventional bourgeois
> >> lives"; "conventional attitudes"
> >>
> >> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> >> more than hair-splitting.
> >> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
> >> always return to hair-splitting.
> >> Zzzzz....
> >
> > I'm sorry; I'm unable to discern your train of thought.
>
> No surprise , I'm not hair-splitting ! :-)

Neither am I, which is what you don't understand.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Jenn a écrit :
> In article >,
> Lionel > wrote:
>
>> Jenn a écrit :
>>> In article >,
>>> Lionel > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jenn a écrit :
>>>>> In article >,
>>>>> Lionel > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jenn a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> too "simplist" !!!!
>>>>>>> that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".
>>>>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
>>>>>> more than hair-splitting.
>>>>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
>>>>>> always return to hair-splitting. :-(
>>>>> What "hair-splitting"? I didn't say that the solo was too simplistic,
>>>>> because I don't think that it was. Seems pretty clear to me. Unless,
>>>>> of course, you believe that simple solos can't be imaginative. I
>>>>> certainly don't believe that to be the truth.
>>>> I'm a simple mind, I only believe what mainstream media teld me :
>>>>
>>>> http://www.answers.com/topic/unimaginative
>>>> 1. Lacking originality: sterile, uncreative, uninspired, uninventive,
>>>> unoriginal. See rich/poor.
>>>> 2. Lacking liveliness, charm, or surprise: arid, aseptic, colorless,
>>>> drab, dry, dull, earthbound, flat, flavorless, lackluster, lifeless,
>>>> lusterless, matter-of-fact, pedestrian, prosaic, spiritless, sterile,
>>>> stodgy, uninspired. See excite/bore/interest."
>>>>
>>>> unimaginativeunimaginative - deficient in originality or creativity;
>>>> lacking powers of invention; "a sterile ideology lacking in
>>>> originality"; "unimaginative development of a musical theme";
>>>> "uninspired writing"
>>>>
>>>> unimaginative - lacking spontaneity or originality or individuality;
>>>> "stereotyped phrases of condolence"; "even his profanity was unimaginative"
>>>> stereotyped, stereotypic, stereotypical
>>>> conventional - unimaginative and conformist; "conventional bourgeois
>>>> lives"; "conventional attitudes"
>>>>
>>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
>>>> more than hair-splitting.
>>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
>>>> always return to hair-splitting.
>>>> Zzzzz....
>>> I'm sorry; I'm unable to discern your train of thought.
>> No surprise , I'm not hair-splitting ! :-)
>
> Neither am I, which is what you don't understand.

Oh, oh, you are from the masochist sub-family of hair-splitters category.
So I will grant you a little 3 stars pleasure...

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> Jenn a écrit :
> > In article >,
> > Lionel > wrote:
> >
> >> Jenn a écrit :
> >>> In article >,
> >>> Lionel > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Jenn a écrit :
> >>>>> In article >,
> >>>>> Lionel > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Jenn a écrit :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> too "simplist" !!!!
> >>>>>>> that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".
> >>>>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> >>>>>> more than hair-splitting.
> >>>>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them
> >>>>>> they
> >>>>>> always return to hair-splitting. :-(
> >>>>> What "hair-splitting"? I didn't say that the solo was too simplistic,
> >>>>> because I don't think that it was. Seems pretty clear to me. Unless,
> >>>>> of course, you believe that simple solos can't be imaginative. I
> >>>>> certainly don't believe that to be the truth.
> >>>> I'm a simple mind, I only believe what mainstream media teld me :
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.answers.com/topic/unimaginative
> >>>> 1. Lacking originality: sterile, uncreative, uninspired, uninventive,
> >>>> unoriginal. See rich/poor.
> >>>> 2. Lacking liveliness, charm, or surprise: arid, aseptic, colorless,
> >>>> drab, dry, dull, earthbound, flat, flavorless, lackluster, lifeless,
> >>>> lusterless, matter-of-fact, pedestrian, prosaic, spiritless, sterile,
> >>>> stodgy, uninspired. See excite/bore/interest."
> >>>>
> >>>> unimaginativeunimaginative - deficient in originality or creativity;
> >>>> lacking powers of invention; "a sterile ideology lacking in
> >>>> originality"; "unimaginative development of a musical theme";
> >>>> "uninspired writing"
> >>>>
> >>>> unimaginative - lacking spontaneity or originality or individuality;
> >>>> "stereotyped phrases of condolence"; "even his profanity was
> >>>> unimaginative"
> >>>> stereotyped, stereotypic, stereotypical
> >>>> conventional - unimaginative and conformist; "conventional bourgeois
> >>>> lives"; "conventional attitudes"
> >>>>
> >>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> >>>> more than hair-splitting.
> >>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
> >>>> always return to hair-splitting.
> >>>> Zzzzz....
> >>> I'm sorry; I'm unable to discern your train of thought.
> >> No surprise , I'm not hair-splitting ! :-)
> >
> > Neither am I, which is what you don't understand.
>
> Oh, oh, you are from the masochist sub-family of hair-splitters category.
> So I will grant you a little 3 stars pleasure...

That's fine. Have fun in whatever you are trying to accomplish.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 29, 6:18*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Lionel > wrote:
> > Jenn a écrit :
> > > In article >,
> > > *Lionel > wrote:
>
> > >> Jenn a écrit :
> > >>> In article >,
> > >>> *Lionel > wrote:
>
> > >>>> Jenn a écrit :
> > >>>>> In article >,
> > >>>>> *Lionel > wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Jenn a écrit :
>
> > >>>>>>>> too "simplist" !!!!
> > >>>>>>> that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".
> > >>>>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> > >>>>>> more than hair-splitting.
> > >>>>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them
> > >>>>>> they
> > >>>>>> always return to hair-splitting. :-(
> > >>>>> What "hair-splitting"? *I didn't say that the solo was too simplistic,
> > >>>>> because I don't think that it was. *Seems pretty clear to me. *Unless,
> > >>>>> of course, you believe that simple solos can't be imaginative. *I
> > >>>>> certainly don't believe that to be the truth.
> > >>>> I'm a simple mind, I only believe what mainstream media teld me :
>
> > >>>>http://www.answers.com/topic/unimaginative
> > >>>> 1. Lacking originality: sterile, uncreative, uninspired, uninventive,
> > >>>> unoriginal. See rich/poor.
> > >>>> 2. Lacking liveliness, charm, or surprise: arid, aseptic, colorless,
> > >>>> drab, dry, dull, earthbound, flat, flavorless, lackluster, lifeless,
> > >>>> lusterless, matter-of-fact, pedestrian, prosaic, spiritless, sterile,
> > >>>> stodgy, uninspired. See excite/bore/interest."
>
> > >>>> unimaginativeunimaginative - deficient in originality or creativity;
> > >>>> lacking powers of invention; "a sterile ideology lacking in
> > >>>> originality"; "unimaginative development of a musical theme";
> > >>>> "uninspired writing"
>
> > >>>> unimaginative - lacking spontaneity or originality or individuality;
> > >>>> "stereotyped phrases of condolence"; "even his profanity was
> > >>>> unimaginative"
> > >>>> stereotyped, stereotypic, stereotypical
> > >>>> conventional - unimaginative and conformist; "conventional bourgeois
> > >>>> lives"; "conventional attitudes"
>
> > >>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> > >>>> more than hair-splitting.
> > >>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
> > >>>> always return to hair-splitting.
> > >>>> Zzzzz....
> > >>> I'm sorry; I'm unable to discern your train of thought.
> > >> No surprise , I'm not hair-splitting ! :-)
>
> > > Neither am I, which is what you don't understand.
>
> > Oh, oh, you are from the masochist sub-family of hair-splitters category.
> > So I will grant you a little 3 stars pleasure...
>
> That's fine. *Have fun in whatever you are trying to accomplish.

Jesus. I thought 2pid had a hard time communicating.

English is 2pid's first language though, so there is that.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 29, 6:18*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Lionel > wrote:
> > Jenn a écrit :
> > > In article >,
> > > *Lionel > wrote:
>
> > >> Jenn a écrit :
> > >>> In article >,
> > >>> *Lionel > wrote:
>
> > >>>> Jenn a écrit :
> > >>>>> In article >,
> > >>>>> *Lionel > wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Jenn a écrit :
>
> > >>>>>>>> too "simplist" !!!!
> > >>>>>>> that IMO it was "pretty unimaginative".
> > >>>>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> > >>>>>> more than hair-splitting.
> > >>>>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them
> > >>>>>> they
> > >>>>>> always return to hair-splitting. :-(
> > >>>>> What "hair-splitting"? *I didn't say that the solo was too simplistic,
> > >>>>> because I don't think that it was. *Seems pretty clear to me. *Unless,
> > >>>>> of course, you believe that simple solos can't be imaginative. *I
> > >>>>> certainly don't believe that to be the truth.
> > >>>> I'm a simple mind, I only believe what mainstream media teld me :
>
> > >>>>http://www.answers.com/topic/unimaginative
> > >>>> 1. Lacking originality: sterile, uncreative, uninspired, uninventive,
> > >>>> unoriginal. See rich/poor.
> > >>>> 2. Lacking liveliness, charm, or surprise: arid, aseptic, colorless,
> > >>>> drab, dry, dull, earthbound, flat, flavorless, lackluster, lifeless,
> > >>>> lusterless, matter-of-fact, pedestrian, prosaic, spiritless, sterile,
> > >>>> stodgy, uninspired. See excite/bore/interest."
>
> > >>>> unimaginativeunimaginative - deficient in originality or creativity;
> > >>>> lacking powers of invention; "a sterile ideology lacking in
> > >>>> originality"; "unimaginative development of a musical theme";
> > >>>> "uninspired writing"
>
> > >>>> unimaginative - lacking spontaneity or originality or individuality;
> > >>>> "stereotyped phrases of condolence"; "even his profanity was
> > >>>> unimaginative"
> > >>>> stereotyped, stereotypic, stereotypical
> > >>>> conventional - unimaginative and conformist; "conventional bourgeois
> > >>>> lives"; "conventional attitudes"
>
> > >>>> The main problem with hair-splitters is that they don't like anything
> > >>>> more than hair-splitting.
> > >>>> You can be charitable, make some efforts... it's stronger than them they
> > >>>> always return to hair-splitting.
> > >>>> Zzzzz....
> > >>> I'm sorry; I'm unable to discern your train of thought.
> > >> No surprise , I'm not hair-splitting ! :-)
>
> > > Neither am I, which is what you don't understand.
>
> > Oh, oh, you are from the masochist sub-family of hair-splitters category.
> > So I will grant you a little 3 stars pleasure...
>
> That's fine. *Have fun in whatever you are trying to accomplish.

Lionel does not speak English and uses a translation program. Couple
that with a dumb and stubborn quality that forces him to remain
utterly irrelevant to the group, and there you go.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 29, 3:31*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "GeoSynch" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > ScottW wrote:
>
> >>>> After Arny and Scott were gone, George commented that
> >>>> he really missed making fun of them. RAO had simply
> >>>> become boring for him.
>
> >>>> It's not rocket science.
>
> >>> You drove them off. George killed himself. Nice work,
> >>> Boonie.
>
> >> Hey, what are friends for? *LoL.
>
> > No doubt Dorgay and the rest of the staff at TONE Audio
> > heaved a big sigh of relief when Boonie packed it in and
> > moved down yonder.
>
> Now that improves my opinion of Dorgay, lots!

My opinion of him improved when he called you a nutcase and told you
to stop emailing him.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :

> It appears that's why Gary and the Frog came back.

You're jumping in a thread which is already finished.
You're late, Sir.
The perfect mastering of any language would not help nor ever change
anything for you, you are late.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Boon a écrit :

> Lionel does not speak English and uses a translation program. Couple
> that with a dumb and stubborn quality that forces him to remain
> utterly irrelevant to the group, and there you go.

I never used a translation program. I guess I should.
BTW I never try to communicate with you.
You are everything I like : coward, stupid, braggart, fat,
short-breathed, wimp...
Even not qualified to make a punching ball. :-D

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 30, 2:20*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :
>
> > It appears that's why Gary and the Frog came back.
>
> You're jumping in a thread which is already finished.
> You're late, Sir.
> The perfect mastering of any language would not help nor ever change
> anything for you, you are late.

Then what are you doing here? LOL!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 30, 2:33*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Boon a écrit :
>
> > Lionel does not speak English and uses a translation program. Couple
> > that with a dumb and stubborn quality that forces him to remain
> > utterly irrelevant to the group, and there you go.
>
> I never used a translation program. I guess I should.

Quit guessing.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :
> On Jan 30, 2:20 am, Lionel > wrote:
>> Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :
>>
>>> It appears that's why Gary and the Frog came back.
>> You're jumping in a thread which is already finished.
>> You're late, Sir.
>> The perfect mastering of any language would not help nor ever change
>> anything for you, you are late.
>
> Then what are you doing here? LOL!

ZZZzzzzz.......

[Lionel[_8_]]

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :
> On Jan 30, 2:33 am, Lionel > wrote:
>> Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> Lionel does not speak English and uses a translation program. Couple
>>> that with a dumb and stubborn quality that forces him to remain
>>> utterly irrelevant to the group, and there you go.
>> I never used a translation program. I guess I should.
>
> Quit guessing.

Quit guessing too ! :o)

[Glanbrok]

La Salope hiccuped:

> > *slamming pints

> I sincerely doubt that George has ever slamming pints.

Last time you graced us with your dowdy presence, you promised to keep
up your studies of EHL (English as a Human Language). Too bad you
failed to follow through.

[Glanbrok]

Slowly regaining her foggy sobriety, Sluttie gradually becomes dimly
aware that there are others in the room with her.

> > And an even more poignant question: Why are you enabling Lionella?
> > Have you forgotten Slut's intractable case of Kroopologism?
>
> :-D !!!!

ew.

> George is so predictable... I really don't understand the fascination he
> exerted on RAO.

Another malasluttism for the scrapbook.

> By[through] his intransigence and lack of empathy (!) he has protected[sic]
> and given a shelter[sic] to a bunch of moronic cry-babies that[sic] have
> bring[sic] more trouble on[sic] RAO than Kruger him[sic]self.

Question for you, Slut: Were you drunk or sober when you made that
post?

BTW, I disagree with your brainless 'thinking'. So does everybody
else, including your beloved Krooborg. Why don't you just drown
yourself in the dam' sewer already?

[Glanbrok]

What's this? What's this?

Slut:
> > > ...He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)

Mr. ****:
> > This is probably true.

Slut:
> If you sincerely have any idea of what true is about, you would
> immediately stop to post on this group.


Lionel, did you just bitch-slap the Krooborg? I'm awestruck.

BTW, "true" is an adjective (it means "vrai"). I'm sure you meant to
say "truth" (la vraiete). Also, when you use a dual-verb construction,
the second verb takes the gerund form ("immediately stop posting")
rather than the infinitive.

Good luck in EHL class!

[Glanbrok]

Boon said:

> > Now that improves my opinion of Dorgay, lots!

> My opinion of him improved when he called you a nutcase and told you
> to stop emailing him.


Really, Marc, you shouldn't taunt the Krooborg with events from
reality. The fantastical construction of paranoia and delusions that
Turdy inhabits isn't strong enough to withstand more thana couple of
such assaults.

As La Salope would say if she could speak EHL, "leave Arnii
ALOOOOONE!"

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 2:33*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Boon a écrit :
>
> > Lionel does not speak English and uses a translation program. Couple
> > that with a dumb and stubborn quality that forces him to remain
> > utterly irrelevant to the group, and there you go.
>
> I never used a translation program. I guess I should.

You should do something. The majority of people ignore you.

> BTW I never try to communicate with you.

And yet here you are, trying.

> You are everything I like : coward, stupid, braggart, fat,
> short-breathed, wimp...

Hmmm...these are things you cannot know without seeing me.

> Even not qualified to make a punching ball. :-D

Oh boy. That was a good one.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 2:36*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2:20*am, Lionel > wrote:
>
> > Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :
>
> > > It appears that's why Gary and the Frog came back.
>
> > You're jumping in a thread which is already finished.
> > You're late, Sir.
> > The perfect mastering of any language would not help nor ever change
> > anything for you, you are late.
>
> Then what are you doing here? LOL!

I started ignoring Lionel the last time he was here because he simply
made no sense and was only interested in wasting everyone's time. His
presence on RAO reminds me of a little boy who shows up to battle with
nothing but a water pistol and an French-English dictionary.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 10:28*am, Glanbrok > wrote:
> Boon said:
>
> > > Now that improves my opinion of Dorgay, lots!
> > My opinion of him improved when he called you a nutcase and told you
> > to stop emailing him.
>
> Really, Marc, you shouldn't taunt the Krooborg with events from
> reality. The fantastical construction of paranoia and delusions that
> Turdy inhabits isn't strong enough to withstand more thana couple of
> such assaults.
>
> As La Salope would say if she could speak EHL, "leave Arnii
> ALOOOOONE!"

I wonder if Arny's attempted return is related to getting banned/
ignored/discredited by other discussion groups.

By the way, check out Arny's Facebook page if you want to put faces to
the horrified people in his life.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Glanbrok a écrit :
> What's this? What's this?
>
> Slut:
>>>> ...He attracted Middius on RAO ;-)
>
> Mr. ****:
>>> This is probably true.
>
> Slut:
>> If you sincerely have any idea of what true is about, you would
>> immediately stop to post on this group.
>
>
> Lionel, did you just bitch-slap the Krooborg? I'm awestruck.

LOL.

> BTW, "true" is an adjective (it means "vrai"). I'm sure you meant to
> say "truth" (la vraiete).

"Vérité", George not "vraieté".
BTW you are right this is what I meant.
OTOH, I note that my English is still better than your French. :-)

Also, when you use a dual-verb construction,
> the second verb takes the gerund form ("immediately stop posting")
> rather than the infinitive.
>
> Good luck in EHL class!

[Lionel[_8_]]

Glanbrok a écrit :
> La Salope hiccuped:
>
>>> slamming pints
>
>> I sincerely doubt that George has ever slamming pints.
>
> Last time you graced us with your dowdy presence, you promised to keep
> up your studies of EHL (English as a Human Language). Too bad you
> failed to follow through.

I'm too lazy.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Boon a écrit :

>> You are everything I like : coward, stupid, braggart, fat,
>> short-breathed, wimp...
>
> Hmmm...these are things you cannot know without seeing me.

Are you trying to make me believe that you have finally lost 160 pounds ?
What a diet ! Congratulation !

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 11:20*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Boon a écrit :
>
> >> You are everything I like : coward, stupid, braggart, fat,
> >> short-breathed, wimp...
>
> > Hmmm...these are things you cannot know without seeing me.
>
> Are you trying to make me believe that you have finally lost 160 pounds ?

No, that would be a completely ridiculous assumption.

> What a diet ! Congratulation !

Sorry, pal. You're not making sense again.

Maybe youre thinking of Scott. The last time I saw him, he had a good
25 pounds on me.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 11:22*am, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 30, 8:16*am, Glanbrok > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Slowly regaining her foggy sobriety, Sluttie gradually becomes dimly
> > aware that there are others in the room with her.
>
> > > > And an even more poignant question: Why are you enabling Lionella?
> > > > Have you forgotten Slut's intractable case of Kroopologism?
>
> > > :-D !!!!
>
> > ew.
>
> > > George is so predictable... I really don't understand the fascination he
> > > exerted on RAO.
>
> > Another malasluttism for the scrapbook.
>
> > > By[through] his intransigence and lack of empathy (!) he has protected[sic]
> > > and given a shelter[sic] to a bunch of moronic cry-babies that[sic] have
> > > bring[sic] more trouble on[sic] RAO than Kruger him[sic]self.
>
> > Question for you, Slut: Were you drunk or sober when you made that
> > post?
>
> > BTW, I disagree with your brainless 'thinking'. So does everybody
> > else,
>
> * Bzzzzzt. *Wrong. * Lionel is spot on.

...says the biggest "moronic cry-baby" of them all.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Boon a écrit :

> His presence on RAO reminds me of a little boy who shows up to battle with
> nothing but a water pistol and an French-English dictionary.

Oh what a nice tender picture !!!

It's OK, I would be your David and you will be my Goliath. :-)

[Lionel[_8_]]

Boon a écrit :
Sorry, pal. You're not making sense again.
>
> Maybe youre thinking of Scott. The last time I saw him, he had a good
> 25 pounds on me.

Do you mean that Scott is 185 pounds overweighted ?
Note that it's a bit common in your area.

[Lionel[_8_]]

ScottW a écrit :

> It's so obvious even Lionel knows it.

Why this "even" ?
A little bit sooner you have written "Lionel is spot on" ?

[Lionel[_8_]]

Boon a écrit :
> On Jan 30, 11:22 am, ScottW > wrote:
>> On Jan 30, 8:16 am, Glanbrok > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Slowly regaining her foggy sobriety, Sluttie gradually becomes dimly
>>> aware that there are others in the room with her.
>>>>> And an even more poignant question: Why are you enabling Lionella?
>>>>> Have you forgotten Slut's intractable case of Kroopologism?
>>>> :-D !!!!
>>> ew.
>>>> George is so predictable... I really don't understand the fascination he
>>>> exerted on RAO.
>>> Another malasluttism for the scrapbook.
>>>> By[through] his intransigence and lack of empathy (!) he has protected[sic]
>>>> and given a shelter[sic] to a bunch of moronic cry-babies that[sic] have
>>>> bring[sic] more trouble on[sic] RAO than Kruger him[sic]self.
>>> Question for you, Slut: Were you drunk or sober when you made that
>>> post?
>>> BTW, I disagree with your brainless 'thinking'. So does everybody
>>> else,
>> Bzzzzzt. Wrong. Lionel is spot on.
>
> ..says the biggest "moronic cry-baby" of them all.

You are dense and so one more time you are wrong.

ScottW doesn't belong to this group of moronic cry-babies.

I really don't appreciate him but "at least" he didn't have the
baseness, the lack of pride of the gang of ass-lickers who were the
Middius' court.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 11:35*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Boon a écrit :
> Sorry, pal. You're not making sense again.
>
>
>
> > Maybe youre thinking of Scott. The last time I saw him, he had a good
> > 25 pounds on me.
>
> Do you mean that Scott is 185 pounds overweighted ?
> Note that it's a bit common in your area.

I don't even weigh 185 pounds, idiot.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 11:33*am, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 30, 9:27*am, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 30, 11:22*am, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 30, 8:16*am, Glanbrok > wrote:
>
> > > > Slowly regaining her foggy sobriety, Sluttie gradually becomes dimly
> > > > aware that there are others in the room with her.
>
> > > > > > And an even more poignant question: Why are you enabling Lionella?
> > > > > > Have you forgotten Slut's intractable case of Kroopologism?
>
> > > > > :-D !!!!
>
> > > > ew.
>
> > > > > George is so predictable... I really don't understand the fascination he
> > > > > exerted on RAO.
>
> > > > Another malasluttism for the scrapbook.
>
> > > > > By[through] his intransigence and lack of empathy (!) he has protected[sic]
> > > > > and given a shelter[sic] to a bunch of moronic cry-babies that[sic] have
> > > > > bring[sic] more trouble on[sic] RAO than Kruger him[sic]self.
>
> > > > Question for you, Slut: Were you drunk or sober when you made that
> > > > post?
>
> > > > BTW, I disagree with your brainless 'thinking'. So does everybody
> > > > else,
>
> > > * Bzzzzzt. *Wrong. * Lionel is spot on.
>
> > ..says the biggest "moronic cry-baby" of them all.
>
> You're doing such a great job of returning RAO to audio....burying it
> in the same 'ol endless stream of snot.

No, I'm discouraging the idiots.

> If you really wanted to do as you claim, you would back off and quit
> the Arny, Lionel, Geo, Gary, me (the list is endless) snotty posting.

That statement doesn't make sense. Try again.

>
> But you won't, because it isn't audio discussions you're here for.

Wrong.

> It's the snot.

Wrong.

> You love it.

Wrong.

> It's so obvious even Lionel knows it.

ZZZZZZZZZZZ.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 11:58*am, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 30, 9:50*am, Lionel > wrote:
>
> > ScottW a écrit :
>
> > > It's so obvious even Lionel knows it.
>
> > Why this "even" ?
>
> I'm not trying to denigrate you. *I was referring to a person who
> isn't here much, has english as a second language, and still sees Marc
> clearly for what he is.
>
> > A little bit sooner you have written "Lionel is spot on" ?
>
> Just calling it like I see it.

That makes you blind, which is an essential component to being a
hypocrite.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 12:31*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 30, 11:22 am, ScottW > wrote:
> >> On Jan 30, 8:16 am, Glanbrok > wrote:
>
> >>> Slowly regaining her foggy sobriety, Sluttie gradually becomes dimly
> >>> aware that there are others in the room with her.
> >>>>> And an even more poignant question: Why are you enabling Lionella?
> >>>>> Have you forgotten Slut's intractable case of Kroopologism?
> >>>> :-D !!!!
> >>> ew.
> >>>> George is so predictable... I really don't understand the fascination he
> >>>> exerted on RAO.
> >>> Another malasluttism for the scrapbook.
> >>>> By[through] his intransigence and lack of empathy (!) he has protected[sic]
> >>>> and given a shelter[sic] to a bunch of moronic cry-babies that[sic] have
> >>>> bring[sic] more trouble on[sic] RAO than Kruger him[sic]self.
> >>> Question for you, Slut: Were you drunk or sober when you made that
> >>> post?
> >>> BTW, I disagree with your brainless 'thinking'. So does everybody
> >>> else,
> >> * Bzzzzzt. *Wrong. * Lionel is spot on.
>
> > ..says the biggest "moronic cry-baby" of them all.
>
> You are dense and so one more time you are wrong.

I am not dense and so one more time I am right.

>
> ScottW doesn't belong to this group of moronic cry-babies.

You're right. ScottW is in a class of moronic cry-babies all by
himself.

>
> I really don't appreciate him but "at least" he didn't have the
> baseness, the lack of pride of the gang of ass-lickers who were the
> Middius' court.

Again this is total nonsense on so many levels.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 30, 10:53*am, Boon > wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2:36*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > On Jan 30, 2:20*am, Lionel > wrote:
>
> > > Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :
>
> > > > It appears that's why Gary and the Frog came back.
>
> > > You're jumping in a thread which is already finished.
> > > You're late, Sir.
> > > The perfect mastering of any language would not help nor ever change
> > > anything for you, you are late.
>
> > Then what are you doing here? LOL!
>
> I started ignoring Lionel the last time he was here because he simply
> made no sense and was only interested in wasting everyone's time. His
> presence on RAO reminds me of a little boy who shows up to battle with
> nothing but a water pistol and an French-English dictionary.

Perhaps this is a sockpuppet of 2pid's.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 30, 11:22*am, ScottW > wrote:
> On Jan 30, 8:16*am, Glanbrok > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Slowly regaining her foggy sobriety, Sluttie gradually becomes dimly
> > aware that there are others in the room with her.
>
> > > > And an even more poignant question: Why are you enabling Lionella?
> > > > Have you forgotten Slut's intractable case of Kroopologism?
>
> > > :-D !!!!
>
> > ew.
>
> > > George is so predictable... I really don't understand the fascination he
> > > exerted on RAO.
>
> > Another malasluttism for the scrapbook.
>
> > > By[through] his intransigence and lack of empathy (!) he has protected[sic]
> > > and given a shelter[sic] to a bunch of moronic cry-babies that[sic] have
> > > bring[sic] more trouble on[sic] RAO than Kruger him[sic]self.
>
> > Question for you, Slut: Were you drunk or sober when you made that
> > post?
>
> > BTW, I disagree with your brainless 'thinking'. So does everybody
> > else,
>
> * Bzzzzzt. *Wrong. * Lionel is spot on.

See? I told you.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 30, 1:18*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Jan 30, 11:58*am, ScottW > wrote:

> > Just calling it like I see it.
>
> That makes you blind, which is an essential component to being a
> hypocrite.

2pid's also functionally illiterate which is an essential component of
communicating with the Frog.

[Coconuts]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>
> I really don't appreciate him but "at least" he didn't
> have the baseness, the lack of pride of the gang of
> ass-lickers who were the Middius' court.

You're an interesting one. You don't seem to appreciate
anyone.

Last week it seemed like only 6 posters here. This week
another 4 have shown up.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 31, 2:34*pm, "Coconuts" > wrote:
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
> > I really don't appreciate him but "at least" he didn't
> > have the baseness, the lack of pride of the gang of
> > ass-lickers who were the Middius' court.
>
> You're an interesting one. You don't seem to appreciate
> anyone.
>
> Last week it seemed like only 6 posters here. This week
> another 4 have shown up.

There are quite a few lurkers here. I get emails from them quite often.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 2:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 10:53*am, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 30, 2:36*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On Jan 30, 2:20*am, Lionel > wrote:
>
> > > > Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :
>
> > > > > It appears that's why Gary and the Frog came back.
>
> > > > You're jumping in a thread which is already finished.
> > > > You're late, Sir.
> > > > The perfect mastering of any language would not help nor ever change
> > > > anything for you, you are late.
>
> > > Then what are you doing here? LOL!
>
> > I started ignoring Lionel the last time he was here because he simply
> > made no sense and was only interested in wasting everyone's time. His
> > presence on RAO reminds me of a little boy who shows up to battle with
> > nothing but a water pistol and an French-English dictionary.
>
> Perhaps this is a sockpuppet of 2pid's.

Can you imagine a redneck with a mullet speaking French? I can't.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 2:32*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 1:18*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Jan 30, 11:58*am, ScottW > wrote:
> > > Just calling it like I see it.
>
> > That makes you blind, which is an essential component to being a
> > hypocrite.
>
> 2pid's also functionally illiterate which is an essential component of
> communicating with the Frog.

LoL. I can almost see Scott's awkward, clumsy phrasing and poor
writing skills being transformed by Lionel's faulty translation module
into something halfway interesting. I'm reminded of Chance the
Gardener in "Being There" for some reason.

[Gary Eickmeier]

Well, I guess it's true - he's really, really gone! Yay! Who knew? But I am
still curious what happened to him.

Gary Eickmeier


"Gary Eickmeier" > wrote in message
...
> OK, the last he posted was Christmas eve. Anyone know what is going on?
>
> Gary Eickmeier
>

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 31, 3:40*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Jan 30, 10:53*am, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 30, 2:36*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Jan 30, 2:20*am, Lionel > wrote:
>
> > > > > Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :
>
> > > > > > It appears that's why Gary and the Frog came back.
>
> > > > > You're jumping in a thread which is already finished.
> > > > > You're late, Sir.
> > > > > The perfect mastering of any language would not help nor ever change
> > > > > anything for you, you are late.
>
> > > > Then what are you doing here? LOL!
>
> > > I started ignoring Lionel the last time he was here because he simply
> > > made no sense and was only interested in wasting everyone's time. His
> > > presence on RAO reminds me of a little boy who shows up to battle with
> > > nothing but a water pistol and an French-English dictionary.
>
> > Perhaps this is a sockpuppet of 2pid's.
>
> Can you imagine a redneck with a mullet speaking French? I can't.

I can imagine a redneck with a mullet using a translation program...

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 31, 8:42*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> Well, I guess it's true - he's really, really gone! Yay! Who knew? But I am
> still curious what happened to him.

Wake up.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 31, 8:42*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> Well, I guess it's true - he's really, really gone! Yay! Who knew? But I am
> still curious what happened to him.
>

You can't be this dumb.

[Gary Eickmeier]

"Boon" > wrote in message
...
On Jan 31, 8:42 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> Well, I guess it's true - he's really, really gone! Yay! Who knew? But I
> am
> still curious what happened to him.
>

You can't be this dumb.

Yes, I am this dumb. Just ****ing tell me. I don't hang around here a lot.
What's the big mystery?

Gary Eickmeier

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 31, 9:54*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:

> I don't hang around here a lot.

Then it really doesn't ****ing matter now, does it.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Coconuts a écrit :

> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>> I really don't appreciate him but "at least" he didn't
>> have the baseness, the lack of pride of the gang of
>> ass-lickers who were the Middius' court.
>
> You're an interesting one. You don't seem to appreciate
> anyone.
>
> Last week it seemed like only 6 posters here. This week
> another 4 have shown up.

I just came to check if nothing wrong happened to an old acquaintance
(the eponymous of this thread).
I knew that if the guy was lying in wait somewhere around, I will easily
find a way to make him show off on RAO.
Mission accomplie... ;-)

Most of the others are the winos who painfully try to keep the bistrot
alive.

[Coconuts]

"Lionel" > wrote in message
...
>
> I just came to check if nothing wrong happened to an old
> acquaintance (the eponymous of this thread).
> I knew that if the guy was lying in wait somewhere around,
> I will easily find a way to make him show off on RAO.
> Mission accomplie... ;-)
>
> Most of the others are the winos who painfully try to keep
> the bistrot alive.

I have a few friends and acquaintances whose primary
language is French. When they speak English, their phrasing
and wording seems much different. Are you doing this
deliberately for some reason or do you suppose it's
regional? Where do you live?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jan 31, 9:54*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> On Jan 31, 8:42 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
>
> > Well, I guess it's true - he's really, really gone! Yay! Who knew? But I
> > am
> > still curious what happened to him.
>
> You can't be this dumb.
>
> Yes, I am this dumb. Just ****ing tell me. I don't hang around here a lot..
> What's the big mystery?

That George posted here for everyone to see?

[Lionel[_8_]]

Coconuts a écrit :
> "Lionel" > wrote in message
> ...
>> I just came to check if nothing wrong happened to an old
>> acquaintance (the eponymous of this thread).
>> I knew that if the guy was lying in wait somewhere around,
>> I will easily find a way to make him show off on RAO.
>> Mission accomplie... ;-)
>>
>> Most of the others are the winos who painfully try to keep
>> the bistrot alive.
>
> I have a few friends and acquaintances whose primary
> language is French. When they speak English, their phrasing
> and wording seems much different. Are you doing this
> deliberately for some reason or do you suppose it's
> regional? Where do you live?

Perhaps that you have met only former good students. :-)

[GeoSynch]

Gary Eickmeier wrote:

>>> But I am still curious what happened to him.

> What's the big mystery?

He started posting again under the name Glanbrok; his didactic response to
Lionel was all the proof anybody needed.

The only conjecture, then, is he stopped posting the day after Christmas due to
an unsuccessful suicide attempt but he probably did succeed in being
involutarily committed to a nuthouse. His insanity was futher compounded by
being denied use of a computer to partake in the only breath-of-life 'lil
Georgie knows, which is rao. Boy George must've bribed or wheedled or fellated
an orderly or ten in order to have limited use of a computer to be able to post
to rao through a Google account for the Glanbrok identity, because his George M.
Middius account is tauntingly out of reach on his home computer at his decrepit
little domicile hovel.

[GeoSynch]

BaBoon blabbered:

> Arny keeps trying to come back against the wishes of his wife and pastor.
> Fortunately they are kept abreast of his Usenet activities.

Thanks to Marc 'the snitch' Phillips.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon blubbered:

> shows up to battle with nothing but a water pistol and an [sic] French-English
> dictionary.

What an idiot.

[Clyde Slick]

On Feb 1, 9:25*pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Gary Eickmeier wrote:
> >>> But I am still curious what happened to him.
> > What's the big mystery?
>
> He started posting again under the name Glanbrok; his didactic response to
> Lionel was all the proof anybody needed.
>
> The only conjecture, then, is he stopped posting the day after Christmas due to
> an unsuccessful suicide attempt but he probably did succeed in being
> involutarily committed to a nuthouse. His insanity was futher compounded by
> being denied use of a computer to partake in the only breath-of-life 'lil
> Georgie knows, which is rao. Boy George must've bribed or wheedled or fellated
> an orderly or ten in order to have limited use of a computer to be able to post
> to rao through a Google account for the Glanbrok identity, because his George M.
> Middius account is tauntingly out of reach on his home computer at his decrepit
> little domicile hovel.

Maybe his wife and pastor are on to him.

[Anon E Mouse]

GeoSynch > schrieb in Nachricht >...

> Gary Eickmeier wrote:
>
> >>> But I am still curious what happened to him.
>
> > What's the big mystery?
>
> He started posting again under the name Glanbrok; his didactic response to
> Lionel was all the proof anybody needed. [...]

OUCH!... The Middiot knew how to spell "vérité"... What an insult to the
dead! Alors ça c'est du propre! You wouldn't know a lawyer if he kicked
your derrière!

Just carry on lecturing me on rootkits... >;->

--
Anon E. Mouse

[Playing] "Cowgirl In the Sand" Neil Young (From "4-Way Street", CSN&Y)

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message


> Arny keeps trying to come back against the wishes of his
> wife and pastor. Fortunately they are kept abreast of his
> Usenet activities.

Delusions of mind reading noted.

[Arny Krueger]

"GeoSynch" > wrote in message

> BaBoon blabbered:
>
>> Arny keeps trying to come back against the wishes of his
>> wife and pastor. Fortunately they are kept abreast of
>> his Usenet activities.
>
> Thanks to Marc 'the snitch' Phillips.

Marc has been running to moma when people call him to account for his
misdeeds for a long time. Most people grow out of this.

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message


> My opinion of him improved when he called you a nutcase
> and told you to stop emailing him.

In your heart of hearts Marc, it probably improved even more when your name
disappeared from this page:

http://www.tonepublications.com/staff/

No matter what others may say about you Marc, you do have a miniscule iota
of self-awareness. If the stench gets strong enough, even the skunk smells
himself.

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message


> I wonder if Arny's attempted return is related to getting
> banned/ ignored/discredited by other discussion groups.

You mean like you were banned from the tech staff over at Tone Audio, Marc?

http://www.tonepublications.com/staff/

As usual Marc, you are externalizing. I'm banned no where, not even at the
SP forum.

[Arny Krueger]

"Gary Eickmeier" > wrote in
message
> Well, I guess it's true - he's really, really gone! Yay!
> Who knew? But I am still curious what happened to him.

Trust me Gary, someone someplace will start up a new account wiht one of his
aliases so that there will be posts under his name.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 2, 8:18*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > Arny keeps trying to come back against the wishes of his
> > wife and pastor. Fortunately they are kept abreast of his
> > Usenet activities.
>
> Delusions of mind reading noted.

Sent to Susie and Pastor Matt.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 2, 8:18*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "GeoSynch" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > BaBoon blabbered:
>
> >> Arny keeps trying to come back against the wishes of his
> >> wife and pastor. Fortunately they are kept abreast of
> >> his Usenet activities.
>
> > Thanks to Marc 'the snitch' Phillips.
>
> Marc has been running to moma when people call him to account for his
> misdeeds for a long time. Most people grow out of this.

Sent to Susie and Pastor Matt.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 2, 8:21*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > My opinion of him improved when he called you a nutcase
> > and told you to stop emailing him.
>
> In your heart of hearts Marc, it probably improved even more when your name
> disappeared from this page:
>
> http://www.tonepublications.com/staff/
>
> No matter what others may say about you Marc, you do have a miniscule iota
> of self-awareness. If the stench gets strong enough, even the skunk smells
> himself.

Sent to Susie and Pastor Matt.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 2, 8:22*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > I wonder if Arny's attempted return is related to getting
> > banned/ ignored/discredited by other discussion groups.
>
> You mean like you were banned from the tech staff over at Tone Audio, Marc?
>
> http://www.tonepublications.com/staff/
>
> As usual Marc, you are externalizing. I'm banned no where, not even at the
> SP forum.

Sent to Susie and Pastor Matt.

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Feb 2, 8:21 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> My opinion of him improved when he called you a nutcase
>>> and told you to stop emailing him.
>>
>> In your heart of hearts Marc, it probably improved even
>> more when your name disappeared from this page:
>>
>> http://www.tonepublications.com/staff/
>>
>> No matter what others may say about you Marc, you do
>> have a miniscule iota of self-awareness. If the stench
>> gets strong enough, even the skunk smells himself.
>
> Sent to Susie and Pastor Matt.

Hi Sue & Matt,

Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
job at ToneAudio.

Pretty strange, because I haven't even thought about Marc or ToneAudio for
over six-9 months.

I tried to set the record straight, but Marc has decided to try to use his
influence with you to further punish me for his self-induced problems.

So, here's a little love note for you both - hope you have a nice day.

[bcoombes]

Arny Krueger wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>> On Feb 2, 8:21 am, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> My opinion of him improved when he called you a nutcase
>>>> and told you to stop emailing him.
>>> In your heart of hearts Marc, it probably improved even
>>> more when your name disappeared from this page:
>>>
>>> http://www.tonepublications.com/staff/
>>>
>>> No matter what others may say about you Marc, you do
>>> have a miniscule iota of self-awareness. If the stench
>>> gets strong enough, even the skunk smells himself.
>> Sent to Susie and Pastor Matt.
>
> Hi Sue & Matt,
>
> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> job at ToneAudio.
>

TRANSLATION..I've been getting my ass whupped in uk.rec.audio so I thought I'd
come running back here.


--
Bill Coombes

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 2, 8:48*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 8:21 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> My opinion of him improved when he called you a nutcase
> >>> and told you to stop emailing him.
>
> >> In your heart of hearts Marc, it probably improved even
> >> more when your name disappeared from this page:
>
> >>http://www.tonepublications.com/staff/
>
> >> No matter what others may say about you Marc, you do
> >> have a miniscule iota of self-awareness. If the stench
> >> gets strong enough, even the skunk smells himself.
>
> > Sent to Susie and Pastor Matt.
>
> Hi Sue & Matt,
>
> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> job at ToneAudio.

That would be a lie.
>
> Pretty strange, because I haven't even thought about Marc or ToneAudio for
> over six-9 months.

That would be a lie. You were here last week doing the same.
>
> I tried to set the record straight, but Marc has decided to try to use his
> influence with you to further punish me for his self-induced problems.
>
> So, here's a little love note for you both - hope you have a nice day.

Both Susie and Pastor Matt can see from the post just how troubled you
are.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :

>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
>> job at ToneAudio.
>
> That would be a lie.


Issue 21
- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
- 5 contributions (or co-contributions)

Issue 22
- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
- 0 contribution

Issue 23
- Philips' name disappear from staff list
- 0 contribution

Issue 24
- No Philips on staff list
- 0 contribution

Issue 25
- No Philips on staff list
- 0 contribution

Issue 26
- No Philips on staff list
- 0 contribution

[cal coolidge]

On Feb 2, 12:40*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> >> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> >> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> >> job at ToneAudio.
>
> > That would be a lie.
>
> Issue 21
> * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> * - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> Issue 22
> * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> * - 0 contribution
>
> Issue 23
> * - Philips' name disappear from staff list
> * - 0 contribution
>
> Issue 24
> * - No Philips on staff list
> * - 0 contribution
>
> Issue 25
> * - No Philips on staff list
> * - 0 contribution
>
> Issue 26
> * - No Philips on staff list
> * - 0 contribution

I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
him.

Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 2, 2:36*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 2, 12:01*pm, cal coolidge > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 12:40*pm, Lionel > wrote:
>
> > > Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> > > >> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> > > >> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> > > >> job at ToneAudio.
>
> > > > That would be a lie.
>
> > > Issue 21
> > > * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> > > * - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> > > Issue 22
> > > * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > > Issue 23
> > > * - Philips' name disappear from staff list
> > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > > Issue 24
> > > * - No Philips on staff list
> > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > > Issue 25
> > > * - No Philips on staff list
> > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > > Issue 26
> > > * - No Philips on staff list
> > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> > knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> > him.
>
> > Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> > decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> > leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>
> *How about your decision to resort to a sockpuppet....again?

It was on purpose, a message sent to someone else.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 8:22*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > I wonder if Arny's attempted return is related to getting
> > banned/ ignored/discredited by other discussion groups.
>
> You mean like you were banned from the tech staff over at Tone Audio, Marc?
>
> http://www.tonepublications.com/staff/
>
> As usual Marc, you are externalizing. I'm banned no where, not even at the
> SP forum.

I guess ashtrays don't equate to leadership positions:

http://www.chryslergroupllc.com/company/team

LOL!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 7:07*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:36*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 12:01*pm, cal coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 2, 12:40*pm, Lionel > wrote:
>
> > > > Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> > > > >> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> > > > >> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> > > > >> job at ToneAudio.
>
> > > > > That would be a lie.
>
> > > > Issue 21
> > > > * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> > > > * - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> > > > Issue 22
> > > > * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> > > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > > > Issue 23
> > > > * - Philips' name disappear from staff list
> > > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > > > Issue 24
> > > > * - No Philips on staff list
> > > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > > > Issue 25
> > > > * - No Philips on staff list
> > > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > > > Issue 26
> > > > * - No Philips on staff list
> > > > * - 0 contribution
>
> > > I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> > > knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> > > him.
>
> > > Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> > > decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> > > leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>
> > *How about your decision to resort to a sockpuppet....again?
>
> It was on purpose, a message sent to someone else.

And I think I know who.

Poor 2pid! A day late and a dollar behind!

I think 2pid's reappearance here is because he's ****ed his home value
dropped over 7% in one quarter.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 8:23*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote in
> ing.com
>
> > Well, I guess it's true - he's really, really gone! Yay!
> > Who knew? But I am still curious what happened to him.
>
> Trust me

LOL!

[Gary Eickmeier]

"GeoSynch" > wrote in message
...
> Gary Eickmeier wrote:
>
>>>> But I am still curious what happened to him.
>
>> What's the big mystery?
>
> He started posting again under the name Glanbrok; his didactic response to
> Lionel was all the proof anybody needed.
>
> The only conjecture, then, is he stopped posting the day after Christmas
> due to an unsuccessful suicide attempt but he probably did succeed in
> being involutarily committed to a nuthouse. His insanity was futher
> compounded by being denied use of a computer to partake in the only
> breath-of-life 'lil Georgie knows, which is rao. Boy George must've bribed
> or wheedled or fellated an orderly or ten in order to have limited use of
> a computer to be able to post to rao through a Google account for the
> Glanbrok identity, because his George M. Middius account is tauntingly out
> of reach on his home computer at his decrepit little domicile hovel.

Thanks for that - but how do you know? How much of this is conjecture? And
why can't he just sign his name the same? Trying for a new persona?

Georgie - what's going on?

Gary Eickmeier

[Gary Eickmeier]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote in
> message
>> Well, I guess it's true - he's really, really gone! Yay!
>> Who knew? But I am still curious what happened to him.
>
> Trust me Gary, someone someplace will start up a new account wiht one of
> his aliases so that there will be posts under his name.

Hi Arn. Fascinating stuff, eh what? I'll be coming up in March. Will you be
at the meeting?

Gary

[Clyde Slick]

On Feb 2, 10:27*pm, "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote:
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > "Gary Eickmeier" > wrote in
> > ing.com
> >> Well, I guess it's true - he's really, really gone! Yay!
> >> Who knew? But I am still curious what happened to him.
>
> > Trust me Gary, someone someplace will start up a new account wiht one of
> > his aliases so that there will be posts under his name.
>
> Hi Arn. Fascinating stuff, eh what? I'll be coming up in March. Will you be
> at the meeting?
>
> Gary

Don 't forget to wear your official SWMWTMS uniform.
http://blogs.heretv.com/hotgayblog/files/penis-costume.jpg

you can calibrate them with your birdhouse windows.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>>
>>> That would be a lie.
>>
>> Issue 21
>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
>> - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>>
>> Issue 22
>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
>> - 0 contribution
>>
>> Issue 23
>> - Philips' name disappear from staff list
>> - 0 contribution
>>
>> Issue 24
>> - No Philips on staff list
>> - 0 contribution
>>
>> Issue 25
>> - No Philips on staff list
>> - 0 contribution
>>
>> Issue 26
>> - No Philips on staff list
>> - 0 contribution
>
> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> him.
>
> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.

Fair, fair...

But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
weight ! :-)

1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
events is a bit surprising.
In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
of customers, competitors, suppliers...

2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.

In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
leave" has been taken by somebody else.
ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 3, 5:32*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > *wrote:
> >> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> >>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> >>>> job at ToneAudio.
>
> >>> That would be a lie.
>
> >> Issue 21
> >> * *- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> >> * *- 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> >> Issue 22
> >> * *- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> >> * *- 0 contribution
>
> >> Issue 23
> >> * *- Philips' name disappear from staff list
> >> * *- 0 contribution
>
> >> Issue 24
> >> * *- No Philips on staff list
> >> * *- 0 contribution
>
> >> Issue 25
> >> * *- No Philips on staff list
> >> * *- 0 contribution
>
> >> Issue 26
> >> * *- No Philips on staff list
> >> * *- 0 contribution
>
> > I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> > knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> > him.
>
> > Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> > decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> > leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>
> Fair, fair...
>
> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
> weight ! :-)
>
> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
> events is a bit surprising.
> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>
> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>
> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)

I could comment, but none of this makes any sense. But Bob Gendron,
formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > wrote:
>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > wrote:
>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>> That would be a lie.
>>
>>>> Issue 21
>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
>>>> - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>>
>>>> Issue 22
>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>> Issue 23
>>>> - Philips' name disappear from staff list
>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>> Issue 24
>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>> Issue 25
>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>> Issue 26
>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
>>> him.
>>
>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>>
>> Fair, fair...
>>
>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
>> weight ! :-)
>>
>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
>> events is a bit surprising.
>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>>
>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>>
>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>

> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.

A bit antinomic no ?

> But Bob Gendron,
> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.

Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
on the issue 21.
Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
"Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
music editor".
Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?

Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
weight... :-D

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 3, 12:05*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>
> >>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> >>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> >>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>> That would be a lie.
>
> >>>> Issue 21
> >>>> * * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> >>>> * * - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> >>>> Issue 22
> >>>> * * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> >>>> * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>> Issue 23
> >>>> * * - Philips' name disappear from staff list
> >>>> * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>> Issue 24
> >>>> * * - No Philips on staff list
> >>>> * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>> Issue 25
> >>>> * * - No Philips on staff list
> >>>> * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>> Issue 26
> >>>> * * - No Philips on staff list
> >>>> * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> >>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> >>> him.
>
> >>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> >>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> >>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>
> >> Fair, fair...
>
> >> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
> >> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
> >> weight ! :-)
>
> >> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
> >> events is a bit surprising.
> >> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
> >> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
> >> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
> >> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>
> >> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
> >> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
> >> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>
> >> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
> >> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
> >> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>
> > I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>
> A bit antinomic no ?
>
> > But Bob Gendron,
> > formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>
> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
> on the issue 21.
> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
> music editor".
> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>
> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
> weight...

You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > wrote:
>>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>>
>>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
>>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
>>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>>
>>>>>> Issue 21
>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
>>>>>> - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>>
>>>>>> Issue 22
>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>> Issue 23
>>>>>> - Philips' name disappear from staff list
>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>> Issue 24
>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>> Issue 25
>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>> Issue 26
>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
>>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
>>>>> him.
>>
>>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
>>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
>>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>>
>>>> Fair, fair...
>>
>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
>>>> weight ! :-)
>>
>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
>>>> events is a bit surprising.
>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>>
>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>>
>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>>
>>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>>
>> A bit antinomic no ?
>>
>>> But Bob Gendron,
>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>>
>> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
>> on the issue 21.
>> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
>> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
>> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
>> music editor".
>> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>>
>> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
>> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
>> weight...
>
> You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
> know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.

Life is ugly, your lies are ugly...
Why don't you tell us the true ? True is very simple : you have been
ejected from ToneAudio.
Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 5:05*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > *wrote:
> >> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>
> >>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > * * *wrote:
> >>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> >>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> >>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>
> >>>>>> Issue 21
> >>>>>> * * *- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> >>>>>> * * *- 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> >>>>>> Issue 22
> >>>>>> * * *- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> >>>>>> * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>> Issue 23
> >>>>>> * * *- Philips' name disappear from staff list
> >>>>>> * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>> Issue 24
> >>>>>> * * *- No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>> * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>> Issue 25
> >>>>>> * * *- No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>> * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>> Issue 26
> >>>>>> * * *- No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>> * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> >>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> >>>>> him.
>
> >>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> >>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> >>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>
> >>>> Fair, fair...
>
> >>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
> >>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
> >>>> weight ! :-)
>
> >>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
> >>>> events is a bit surprising.
> >>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
> >>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
> >>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
> >>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>
> >>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
> >>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
> >>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>
> >>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
> >>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
> >>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>
> >>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>
> >> A bit antinomic no ?
>
> >>> But Bob Gendron,
> >>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>
> >> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
> >> on the issue 21.
> >> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
> >> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
> >> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
> >> music editor".
> >> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>
> >> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
> >> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
> >> weight...
>
> > You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
> > know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.
>
> Life is ugly, your lies are ugly...

There are no lies. You are simply trying to make something out of
nothing.

> Why don't you tell us the true ? True is very simple : you have been
> ejected from ToneAudio.

That is not true. That would be a lie.

> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.

You are? Prove it!

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 3, 12:05*pm, Lionel > wrote:
Now that I've had my coffee, let's look at what you are trying to say,
Lionel.

>
> >> Fair, fair...
>
> >> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
> >> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
> >> weight ! :-)
>
> >> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
> >> events is a bit surprising.
> >> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
> >> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
> >> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
> >> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>
> >> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
> >> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
> >> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.

Actually, if you were a smarter guy, you'd see that the PDF file
didn't actually shrink, but that TONE started offering a lower rez
download for people whose computers aren't quite up to dowloading the
existing files. Many readers, especially those still using dial-up,
complained that the downloads were too large and that it took forever.
This was an option that Jeff created to help those readers.

In addition, if you were a smarter guy you would have noticed a new
web hosting company on the masthead. This company was instrumental in
making the files more streamlined as well.

Now, what does this have to do with me again?

>
> >> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
> >> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
> >> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)

When someone leaves a company, it is common practice to promote
someone else to fill that position.

Whatever point you're trying to make here is pretty strange.

>
> > But Bob Gendron,
> > formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>
> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
> on the issue 21.

We hired Bob as a music writer before I left.

> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.

That's because I left TONE. Was Jeff supposed to keep me on forever as
a tribute?

> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
> music editor".
> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?

Who was the former assistant music editor? Was it me? No, it was
someone else who also left TONE.

I say that Bob took over for me because he's writing many of the same
articles as I once did. However, I did a few things that Bob didn't
do, which is why my title was different. As far as I can tell, Bob
doesn't edit, and he doesn't do equipment reviews. I did. He probably
doesn't help with administrative tasks, either. He writes music
articles.

>
> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
> weight... :-D

As we see, there are no real coincidences here. In fact, none of this
makes sense. You continue to be an irrelevant person here on RAO. I
assume you probably are irrelevent in the real world as well, which is
why you continue to devote so much time to a NG that mostly ignores
you. So I'll put you in the same category as PLF, ScottW, Howard and
Arny...men who no longer impact the world around them, leading them to
create Usenet personas that try to address their inadequacies.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 17:10, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 5:05 am, > wrote:
>> Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > wrote:
>>>> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > wrote:
>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
>>>>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
>>>>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>>
>>>>>>>> Issue 21
>>>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
>>>>>>>> - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>>
>>>>>>>> Issue 22
>>>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>> Issue 23
>>>>>>>> - Philips' name disappear from staff list
>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>> Issue 24
>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>> Issue 25
>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>> Issue 26
>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
>>>>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
>>>>>>> him.
>>
>>>>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
>>>>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
>>>>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>>
>>>>>> Fair, fair...
>>
>>>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
>>>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
>>>>>> weight ! :-)
>>
>>>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
>>>>>> events is a bit surprising.
>>>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
>>>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
>>>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
>>>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>>
>>>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
>>>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
>>>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
>>>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
>>>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>>
>>>>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>>
>>>> A bit antinomic no ?
>>
>>>>> But Bob Gendron,
>>>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>>
>>>> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
>>>> on the issue 21.
>>>> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
>>>> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
>>>> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
>>>> music editor".
>>>> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>>
>>>> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
>>>> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
>>>> weight...
>>
>>> You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
>>> know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.
>>
>> Life is ugly, your lies are ugly...
>
> There are no lies. You are simply trying to make something out of
> nothing.
>
>> Why don't you tell us the true ? True is very simple : you have been
>> ejected from ToneAudio.
>
> That is not true. That would be a lie.

I don't believe you.
In the normal world when someone arrive in a work group his future
colleagues say welcome.... This is what we can read on issue 21 page 7
for Bob Gendron, a short but friendly panegyric.

In the normal world when a long time appreciated collaborator leave a
work group his ex-colleagues offer him their best wishes, good luck.
I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.
More important an advice is given to third parties to explain them the
situation...
I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.

>> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.
>
> You are? Prove it!

Yes, I would never read two reviews from a guy who can write :
"(Sonny) Rollins has always been my favorite jazz saxophonist".

Sonny Rollins is to the saxophone what a lumberjack is to the wood
sculpture. :-)

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 17:54, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > wrote:
> Now that I've had my coffee, let's look at what you are trying to say,
> Lionel.
>
>>
>>>> Fair, fair...
>>
>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
>>>> weight ! :-)
>>
>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
>>>> events is a bit surprising.
>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>>
>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>
> Actually, if you were a smarter guy, you'd see that the PDF file
> didn't actually shrink, but that TONE started offering a lower rez
> download for people whose computers aren't quite up to dowloading the
> existing files. Many readers, especially those still using dial-up,
> complained that the downloads were too large and that it took forever.
> This was an option that Jeff created to help those readers.
>
> In addition, if you were a smarter guy you would have noticed a new
> web hosting company on the masthead. This company was instrumental in
> making the files more streamlined as well.
>
> Now, what does this have to do with me again?


Point 1 : Fair explanations, funny coincidence, nothing else.
Point 2 : nothing

>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>
> When someone leaves a company, it is common practice to promote
> someone else to fill that position.

> Whatever point you're trying to make here is pretty strange.

No point here, so nothing strange.

>>
>>> But Bob Gendron,
>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>>
>> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
>> on the issue 21.
>
> We hired Bob as a music writer before I left.

You'd better write "They hired Bob as music..." no ?

>> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
>> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
>
> That's because I left TONE. Was Jeff supposed to keep me on forever as
> a tribute?

At least he kept you on the staff list of the issue 22 even if you
didn't produce anything on this one. This could lead to think that your
departure has been a little bit "unexpected", "abrupte".

>> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
>> music editor".
>> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>
> Who was the former assistant music editor? Was it me? No, it was
> someone else who also left TONE.

Did he was fired too ?

> I say that Bob took over for me because he's writing many of the same
> articles as I once did. However, I did a few things that Bob didn't
> do, which is why my title was different. As far as I can tell, Bob
> doesn't edit, and he doesn't do equipment reviews. I did. He probably
> doesn't help with administrative tasks, either. He writes music
> articles.

Dishes also ? ;-)
So, you do all that for ToneAudio and they didn't have a word (nothing
for your fans) for you on the issues that have followed your departure ?
What a bunch of ingrates they didn't deserve you !!!

>> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
>> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
>> weight... :-D
>
> As we see, there are no real coincidences here.

I see....

> In fact, none of this
> makes sense

So why do you waste your time to answer one more time ?

> You continue to be an irrelevant person here on RAO. I
> assume you probably are irrelevent in the real world as well, which is
> why you continue to devote so much time to a NG

Not even 20 posts per year ! My production isn't so huge.

> that mostly ignores
> you.

Don't worry, you remain one of my preferred interlocutor.

> So I'll put you in the same category as PLF, ScottW, Howard and
> Arny...men who no longer impact the world around them,

I suppose that this not is a compliment but you are right I do my best
to have the minimum impact on the world around. I strongly suggest you
to do the same.

> leading them to
> create Usenet personas that try to address their inadequacies.

To have fun at the cost of a well-known asshole is a venial sin.
Thank you for playing.
Once again.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 12:09*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 17:10, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 5:05 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > * * *wrote:
> >>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> >>>>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> >>>>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>
> >>>>>>>> Issue 21
> >>>>>>>> * * * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> >>>>>>>> * * * - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> >>>>>>>> Issue 22
> >>>>>>>> * * * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> >>>>>>>> * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>> Issue 23
> >>>>>>>> * * * - Philips' name disappear from staff list
> >>>>>>>> * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>> Issue 24
> >>>>>>>> * * * - No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>> * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>> Issue 25
> >>>>>>>> * * * - No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>> * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>> Issue 26
> >>>>>>>> * * * - No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>> * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> >>>>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> >>>>>>> him.
>
> >>>>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> >>>>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> >>>>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>
> >>>>>> Fair, fair...
>
> >>>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
> >>>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
> >>>>>> weight ! :-)
>
> >>>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
> >>>>>> events is a bit surprising.
> >>>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
> >>>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
> >>>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
> >>>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>
> >>>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
> >>>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
> >>>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
> >>>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
> >>>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>
> >>>>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>
> >>>> A bit antinomic no ?
>
> >>>>> But Bob Gendron,
> >>>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>
> >>>> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
> >>>> on the issue 21.
> >>>> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
> >>>> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
> >>>> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
> >>>> music editor".
> >>>> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>
> >>>> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
> >>>> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
> >>>> weight...
>
> >>> You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
> >>> know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.
>
> >> Life is ugly, your lies are ugly...
>
> > There are no lies. You are simply trying to make something out of
> > nothing.
>
> >> Why don't you tell us the true ? True is very simple : you have been
> >> ejected from ToneAudio.
>
> > That is not true. That would be a lie.
>
> I don't believe you.

I don't care.

> In the normal world when someone arrive in a work group his future
> colleagues say welcome.... This is what we can read on issue 21 page 7
> for Bob Gendron, a short but friendly panegyric.
>
> In the normal world when a long time appreciated collaborator leave a
> work group his ex-colleagues offer him their best wishes, good luck.
> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.

Many people have left TONEAudio since its inception. Not once was
there a fare thee well. So why should I be different?

> More important an advice is given to third parties to explain them the
> situation...
> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.

Let's say I was "ejected" from TONEAudio. Usually most people, when
fired, are quick to badmouth a former employer. I haven't...because I
left on good terms.

>
> >> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.
>
> > You are? Prove it!
>
> Yes, I would never read two reviews from a guy who can write :
> "(Sonny) Rollins has always been my favorite jazz saxophonist".
>
> Sonny Rollins is to the saxophone what a lumberjack is to the wood
> sculpture. :-)

That would be you opinion. And if it was worth something, someone
would be paying you to express it.

So since your "points" have been discredited and now you're just
making stuff up (why is that so common on RAO?), it's time to tell you
to mind your own ****ing business.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 12:40*pm, Lionel > wrote:

> To have fun at the cost of a well-known asshole is a venial sin.
> Thank you for playing.
> Once again.

No, thank YOU for playing. You're just another Internet geek who just
got crushed like a bug on the ground. Don't try to turn it into
something else. That kind of boorish behavior is way too common on the
Internet as well as the real world.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 20:10, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 12:09 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 04/02/2010 17:10, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 5:05 am, > wrote:
>>>> Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > wrote:
>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
>>>>>>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
>>>>>>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Issue 21
>>>>>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
>>>>>>>>>> - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Issue 22
>>>>>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Issue 23
>>>>>>>>>> - Philips' name disappear from staff list
>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Issue 24
>>>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Issue 25
>>>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Issue 26
>>>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
>>>>>>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
>>>>>>>>> him.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
>>>>>>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
>>>>>>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>>
>>>>>>>> Fair, fair...
>>
>>>>>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
>>>>>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
>>>>>>>> weight ! :-)
>>
>>>>>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
>>>>>>>> events is a bit surprising.
>>>>>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
>>>>>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
>>>>>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
>>>>>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>>
>>>>>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
>>>>>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
>>>>>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
>>>>>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
>>>>>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>>
>>>>>>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>>
>>>>>> A bit antinomic no ?
>>
>>>>>>> But Bob Gendron,
>>>>>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>>
>>>>>> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
>>>>>> on the issue 21.
>>>>>> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
>>>>>> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
>>>>>> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
>>>>>> music editor".
>>>>>> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>>
>>>>>> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
>>>>>> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
>>>>>> weight...
>>
>>>>> You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
>>>>> know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.
>>
>>>> Life is ugly, your lies are ugly...
>>
>>> There are no lies. You are simply trying to make something out of
>>> nothing.
>>
>>>> Why don't you tell us the true ? True is very simple : you have been
>>>> ejected from ToneAudio.
>>
>>> That is not true. That would be a lie.
>>
>> I don't believe you.
>
> I don't care.

So why do you answer ?

>> In the normal world when someone arrive in a work group his future
>> colleagues say welcome.... This is what we can read on issue 21 page 7
>> for Bob Gendron, a short but friendly panegyric.
>>
>> In the normal world when a long time appreciated collaborator leave a
>> work group his ex-colleagues offer him their best wishes, good luck.
>> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.
>
> Many people have left TONEAudio since its inception. Not once was
> there a fare thee well. So why should I be different?

Because you also made the dishes. ;-)

>> More important an advice is given to third parties to explain them the
>> situation...
>> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.
>
> Let's say I was "ejected" from TONEAudio. Usually most people, when
> fired, are quick to badmouth a former employer. I haven't...because I
> left on good terms.

What a bad excuse.
In your case the situation would be worst, it is clear you are not in
position to badmouth anybody.


>>>> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.
>>
>>> You are? Prove it!
>>
>> Yes, I would never read two reviews from a guy who can write :
>> "(Sonny) Rollins has always been my favorite jazz saxophonist".
>>
>> Sonny Rollins is to the saxophone what a lumberjack is to the wood
>> sculpture. :-)
>
> That would be you opinion.

Yes.
This is why I would never read any more music review from you.
Considering the samples I found on TA I must say that they are childish
without feeling, mainstream tagged. Kind of fast-food literature which
is the contrary of what I call a good critic.

> And if it was worth something, someone
> would be paying you to express it.

LOL ! This is a prostitute point of view.

> So since your "points" have been discredited and now you're just

Nothing has been discredited except you.

> making stuff up (why is that so common on RAO?),

Don't spit in your soup, hypocrite ! This is why you are here. :-)

> it's time to tell you
> to mind your own ****ing business.

You can tell what you want.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 20:13, BigBoon a écrit :

> On Feb 4, 12:40 pm, > wrote:
>
>> To have fun at the cost of a well-known asshole is a venial sin.
>> Thank you for playing.
>> Once again.
>
> No, thank YOU for playing.

Just count in this thread how many time you have pretend to ignore me
and you are still answering. You are just a puppet in my hand.
Do you want to bet ?

> You're just another Internet geek who just
> got crushed like a bug on the ground.

I'm afraid that except your wife once a month, you never crushed
anything in your life. ;-)

> Don't try to turn it into
> something else.

You are so vain, feeble and stupid that you cannot even respect your own
wishes : "I must ignore the internet geeks"

> That kind of boorish behavior is way too common on the
> Internet as well as the real world.

You are full of paradox and contradiction like a teenager, I'm not
surprise that you have been ejected from TA.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 1:54*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 20:10, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 12:09 pm, > *wrote:
> >> Le 04/02/2010 17:10, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> On Feb 4, 5:05 am, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > * * *wrote:
> >>>>>> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > * * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> >>>>>>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Issue 21
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Issue 22
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Issue 23
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- Philips' name disappear from staff list
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Issue 24
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Issue 25
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Issue 26
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>>>> * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> >>>>>>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> >>>>>>>>> him.
>
> >>>>>>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> >>>>>>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> >>>>>>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>
> >>>>>>>> Fair, fair...
>
> >>>>>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
> >>>>>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
> >>>>>>>> weight ! :-)
>
> >>>>>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
> >>>>>>>> events is a bit surprising.
> >>>>>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
> >>>>>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
> >>>>>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
> >>>>>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>
> >>>>>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
> >>>>>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
> >>>>>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
> >>>>>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
> >>>>>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>
> >>>>>>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>
> >>>>>> A bit antinomic no ?
>
> >>>>>>> But Bob Gendron,
> >>>>>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>
> >>>>>> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
> >>>>>> on the issue 21.
> >>>>>> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
> >>>>>> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
> >>>>>> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
> >>>>>> music editor".
> >>>>>> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>
> >>>>>> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
> >>>>>> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
> >>>>>> weight...
>
> >>>>> You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
> >>>>> know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 2:08*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 20:13, BigBoon a écrit :
>
> > On Feb 4, 12:40 pm, > *wrote:
>
> >> To have fun at the cost of a well-known asshole is a venial sin.
> >> Thank you for playing.
> >> Once again.
>
> > No, thank YOU for playing.
>
> Just count in this thread how many time you have pretend to ignore me
> and you are still answering.

I count zero.

You are just a puppet in my hand.
> Do you want to bet ?

Sure.

>
> > You're just another Internet geek who just
> > got crushed like a bug on the ground.
>
> I'm afraid that except your wife once a month, you never crushed
> anything in your life. ;-)

Again, that's a silly, nonsensical statement based upon a fantasy you
have of me.

>
> > Don't try to turn it into
> > something else.
>
> You are so vain, feeble and stupid that you cannot even respect your own
> wishes : "I must ignore the internet geeks"

No, I like to torture the Internet geeks. Look at who has who on a
fishing hook!

>
> > That kind of boorish behavior is way too common on the
> > Internet as well as the real world.
>
> You are full of paradox and contradiction like a teenager, I'm not
> surprise that you have been ejected from TA.

I'm surprised. I didn't know I had been ejected. But that's another
fantasy of yours.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 21:49, Boon a écrit :

>> Just count in this thread how many time you have pretend to ignore me
>> and you are still answering.
>
> I count zero.

Learn to count

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 3:12*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 21:49, Boon a écrit :
>
> >> Just count in this thread how many time you have pretend to ignore me
> >> and you are still answering.
>
> > I count zero.
>
> Learn to count

I learned how to count when I was three years old. Even then I could
easily count up to the pounds that you must weigh now.

I've never "pretended" to ignore you. I either do or I don't.

Learn to read English.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 21:46, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 1:54 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 04/02/2010 20:10, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 12:09 pm, > wrote:
>>>> Le 04/02/2010 17:10, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>> On Feb 4, 5:05 am, > wrote:
>>>>>> Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>>>> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 21
>>>>>>>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
>>>>>>>>>>>> - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 22
>>>>>>>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 23
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Philips' name disappear from staff list
>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 24
>>>>>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 25
>>>>>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 26
>>>>>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
>>>>>>>>>>> him.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
>>>>>>>>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
>>>>>>>>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fair, fair...
>>
>>>>>>>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
>>>>>>>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
>>>>>>>>>> weight ! :-)
>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
>>>>>>>>>> events is a bit surprising.
>>>>>>>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
>>>>>>>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
>>>>>>>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
>>>>>>>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
>>>>>>>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
>>>>>>>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
>>>>>>>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
>>>>>>>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>>
>>>>>>>>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>>
>>>>>>>> A bit antinomic no ?
>>
>>>>>>>>> But Bob Gendron,
>>>>>>>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>>
>>>>>>>> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
>>>>>>>> on the issue 21.
>>>>>>>> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
>>>>>>>> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
>>>>>>>> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
>>>>>>>> music editor".
>>>>>>>> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
>>>>>>>> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
>>>>>>>> weight...
>>
>>>>>>> You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
>>>>>>> know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.
>>
>>>>>> Life is ugly, your lies are ugly...
>>
>>>>> There are no lies. You are simply trying to make something out of
>>>>> nothing.
>>
>>>>>> Why don't you tell us the true ? True is very simple : you have been
>>>>>> ejected from ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>> That is not true. That would be a lie.
>>
>>>> I don't believe you.
>>
>>> I don't care.
>>
>> So why do you answer ?
>
> I didn't.
>
>>
>>>> In the normal world when someone arrive in a work group his future
>>>> colleagues say welcome.... This is what we can read on issue 21 page 7
>>>> for Bob Gendron, a short but friendly panegyric.
>>
>>>> In the normal world when a long time appreciated collaborator leave a
>>>> work group his ex-colleagues offer him their best wishes, good luck.
>>>> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.
>>
>>> Many people have left TONEAudio since its inception. Not once was
>>> there a fare thee well. So why should I be different?
>>
>> Because you also made the dishes. ;-)
>
> That makes no sense in English.
>
>>
>>>> More important an advice is given to third parties to explain them the
>>>> situation...
>>>> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.
>>
>>> Let's say I was "ejected" from TONEAudio. Usually most people, when
>>> fired, are quick to badmouth a former employer. I haven't...because I
>>> left on good terms.
>>
>> What a bad excuse.
>> In your case the situation would be worst, it is clear you are not in
>> position to badmouth anybody.
>
> That's not true. It is common behavior to badmouth an amployer after
> being let go. Very common.
>
>>
>>>>>> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.
>>
>>>>> You are? Prove it!
>>
>>>> Yes, I would never read two reviews from a guy who can write :
>>>> "(Sonny) Rollins has always been my favorite jazz saxophonist".
>>
>>>> Sonny Rollins is to the saxophone what a lumberjack is to the wood
>>>> sculpture. :-)
>>
>>> That would be you opinion.
>>
>> Yes.
>> This is why I would never read any more music review from you.
>> Considering the samples I found on TA I must say that they are childish
>> without feeling, mainstream tagged. Kind of fast-food literature which
>> is the contrary of what I call a good critic.
>
> That would be your opinion. I would consider it a very poor one as
> well, since you struggle with English.

What a lame excuse lazy cretin.

>>> And if it was worth something, someone
>>> would be paying you to express it.
>>
>> LOL ! This is a prostitute point of view.
>
> So everyone who works for money is a prostitute? That's the dumbest
> thing I've ever heard.
>
>>
>>> So since your "points" have been discredited and now you're just
>>
>> Nothing has been discredited except you.
>
> In your opinion, which doesn't matter to me.

Zzzzzzzzzzzz....

>>
>>> making stuff up (why is that so common on RAO?),
>>
>> Don't spit in your soup, hypocrite ! This is why you are here. :-)
>
> Um, no. Once you have proven that I have lied, then you can make that
> statement. Since you've only offered the whimsical opinion of a chubby
> little Frenchman, I'll reject the hypocrite label.

Me chubby ? LOL !!!
I'm regularly biking and play handball. I recently stop marathon because
of tendinitis...

But I'm magnanimous and I will excuse that since it's normal that the
fat diabetic red face I've seen on the internet few years ago could be
jealous of my pretty silhouette. ;-)


>>> it's time to tell you
>>> to mind your own ****ing business.
>>
>> You can tell what you want.-
>
> We know you're French, we now know you're chubby, so feel free to
> elaborate.

Why are you writing "we". Schizophrenia ? So much people in so large
body ? :-D

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 22:18, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 3:12 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 04/02/2010 21:49, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>> Just count in this thread how many time you have pretend to ignore me
>>>> and you are still answering.
>>
>>> I count zero.
>>
>> Learn to count
>
> I learned how to count when I was three years old. Even then I could
> easily count up to the pounds that you must weigh now.

Say big fat Phillips.

> I've never "pretended" to ignore you. I either do or I don't.
>
> Learn to read English.

Zzzzzzzzzzzz.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 3:33*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 21:46, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 1:54 pm, > *wrote:
> >> Le 04/02/2010 20:10, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> On Feb 4, 12:09 pm, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 04/02/2010 17:10, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>> On Feb 4, 5:05 am, > * * *wrote:
> >>>>>> Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > * * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > * * * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 21
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 22
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 23
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - Philips' name disappear from staff list
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 24
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 25
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 26
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * - 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> >>>>>>>>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> >>>>>>>>>>> him.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> >>>>>>>>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> >>>>>>>>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Fair, fair...
>
> >>>>>>>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
> >>>>>>>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
> >>>>>>>>>> weight ! :-)
>
> >>>>>>>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
> >>>>>>>>>> events is a bit surprising.
> >>>>>>>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
> >>>>>>>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions.. Small
> >>>>>>>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
> >>>>>>>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
> >>>>>>>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
> >>>>>>>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
> >>>>>>>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
> >>>>>>>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>
> >>>>>>>>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>
> >>>>>>>> A bit antinomic no ?
>
> >>>>>>>>> But Bob Gendron,
> >>>>>>>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>
> >>>>>>>> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
> >>>>>>>> on the issue 21.
> >>>>>>>> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
> >>>>>>>> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
> >>>>>>>> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
> >>>>>>>> music editor".
> >>>>>>>> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>
> >>>>>>>> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
> >>>>>>>> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
> >>>>>>>> weight...
>
> >>>>>>> You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
> >>>>>>> know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.
>
> >>>>>> Life is ugly, your lies are ugly...
>
> >>>>> There are no lies. You are simply trying to make something out of
> >>>>> nothing.
>
> >>>>>> Why don't you tell us the true ? True is very simple : you have been
> >>>>>> ejected from ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>> That is not true. That would be a lie.
>
> >>>> I don't believe you.
>
> >>> I don't care.
>
> >> So why do you answer ?
>
> > I didn't.
>
> >>>> In the normal world when someone arrive in a work group his future
> >>>> colleagues say welcome.... This is what we can read on issue 21 page 7
> >>>> for Bob Gendron, a short but friendly panegyric.
>
> >>>> In the normal world when a long time appreciated collaborator leave a
> >>>> work group his ex-colleagues offer him their best wishes, good luck.
> >>>> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.
>
> >>> Many people have left TONEAudio since its inception. Not once was
> >>> there a fare thee well. So why should I be different?
>
> >> Because you also made the dishes. ;-)
>
> > That makes no sense in English.
>
> >>>> More important an advice is given to third parties to explain them the
> >>>> situation...
> >>>> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.
>
> >>> Let's say I was "ejected" from TONEAudio. Usually most people, when
> >>> fired, are quick to badmouth a former employer. I haven't...because I
> >>> left on good terms.
>
> >> What a bad excuse.
> >> In your case the situation would be worst, it is clear you are not in
> >> position to badmouth anybody.
>
> > That's not true. It is common behavior to badmouth an amployer after
> > being let go. Very common.
>
> >>>>>> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.
>
> >>>>> You are? Prove it!
>
> >>>> Yes, I would never read two reviews from a guy who can write :
> >>>> "(Sonny) Rollins has always been my favorite jazz saxophonist".
>
> >>>> Sonny Rollins is to the saxophone what a lumberjack is to the wood
> >>>> sculpture. :-)
>
> >>> That would be you opinion.
>
> >> Yes.
> >> This is why I would never read any more music review from you.
> >> Considering the samples I found on TA I must say that they are childish
> >> without feeling, mainstream tagged. Kind of fast-food literature which
> >> is the contrary of what I call a good critic.
>
> > That would be your opinion. I would consider it a very poor one as
> > well, since you struggle with English.
>
> What a lame excuse lazy cretin.

I'm lazy because I can't decipher your horrible English? LOL!

>
> >>> And if it was worth something, someone
> >>> would be paying you to express it.
>
> >> LOL ! This is a prostitute point of view.
>
> > So everyone who works for money is a prostitute? That's the dumbest
> > thing I've ever heard.
>
> >>> So since your "points" have been discredited and now you're just
>
> >> Nothing has been discredited except you.
>
> > In your opinion, which doesn't matter to me.
>
> Zzzzzzzzzzzz....

If you find me so boring, why do you keep responding to me?

>
>
>
> >>> making stuff up (why is that so common on RAO?),
>
> >> Don't spit in your soup, hypocrite ! This is why you are here. :-)
>
> > Um, no. Once you have proven that I have lied, then you can make that
> > statement. Since you've only offered the whimsical opinion of a chubby
> > little Frenchman, I'll reject the hypocrite label.
>
> Me chubby ? LOL !!!
> I'm regularly biking and play handball. I recently stop marathon because
> of tendinitis...

I don't believe you. Handball is a cissy game, and you probably ride
on the back of a tandem bicycle while a more healthy friend pedals you
around. Tendinitis comes from improper conditioning, so clearly you
are out of shape.

>
> But I'm magnanimous and I will excuse that since it's normal that the
> fat diabetic red face I've seen on the internet few years ago could be
> jealous of my pretty silhouette. *;-)

What pretty sihouette? Being anonymous on the Internet allows you to
make up big fantasy versions of yourself, no? I'm sure your are
ghastly. If you were attractive, you wouldn't be wasting your time
trying to speak English on a forum where no one understands what you
are saying. That is the sport of a huge, pimply French **** like
yourself.

>
> >>> it's time to tell you
> >>> to mind your own ****ing business.
>
> >> You can tell what you want.-
>
> > We know you're French, we now know you're chubby, so feel free to
> > elaborate.
>
> Why are you writing "we". Schizophrenia ? So much people in so large
> body ? :-D-

Of course not, silly. While a great many people here ignore you
because you are fat, irreverant little troll, some do accidentally see
your verbal diarrhea. In English, that necessitates the use of the
pronoun "we."

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 21:46, Boon a écrit :

>>>>>> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.
>>
>>>>> You are? Prove it!
>>
>>>> Yes, I would never read two reviews from a guy who can write :
>>>> "(Sonny) Rollins has always been my favorite jazz saxophonist".
>>
>>>> Sonny Rollins is to the saxophone what a lumberjack is to the wood
>>>> sculpture. :-)
>>
>>> That would be you opinion.
>>
>> Yes.
>> This is why I would never read any more music review from you.
>> Considering the samples I found on TA I must say that they are childish
>> without feeling, mainstream tagged. Kind of fast-food literature which
>> is the contrary of what I call a good critic.
>
> That would be your opinion. I would consider it a very poor one as
> well, since you struggle with English.
>
>>
>>> And if it was worth something, someone
>>> would be paying you to express it.
>>
>> LOL ! This is a prostitute point of view.
>
> So everyone who works for money is a prostitute? That's the dumbest
> thing I've ever heard.

You are really to slow, to dense.
This is not what it means, cretin. Read and read again your statement
and my answer and there's a little chance that tomorrow morning...

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 3:37*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 22:18, Boon a écrit :
>
> > On Feb 4, 3:12 pm, > *wrote:
> >> Le 04/02/2010 21:49, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>> Just count in this thread how many time you have pretend to ignore me
> >>>> and you are still answering.
>
> >>> I count zero.
>
> >> Learn to count
>
> > I learned how to count when I was three years old. Even then I could
> > easily count up to the pounds that you must weigh now.
>
> Say big fat Phillips.

Oh, I have touched a nerve. When you were young you stayed slim. You
were able to ride bikes and play handball. Now due to the tendonitis
caused by your obvious obesity, it's a chore to even type on your
keyboard with your fat little fingers. How sad, La Salope.

>
> > I've never "pretended" to ignore you. I either do or I don't.
>
> > Learn to read English.
>
> Zzzzzzzzzzzz.

Be careful not to fall forward and have your face land in your third
creme brulee of the day, my chubby little friend. What a waster that
would be, no?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 3:53*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 21:46, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>>> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.
>
> >>>>> You are? Prove it!
>
> >>>> Yes, I would never read two reviews from a guy who can write :
> >>>> "(Sonny) Rollins has always been my favorite jazz saxophonist".
>
> >>>> Sonny Rollins is to the saxophone what a lumberjack is to the wood
> >>>> sculpture. :-)
>
> >>> That would be you opinion.
>
> >> Yes.
> >> This is why I would never read any more music review from you.
> >> Considering the samples I found on TA I must say that they are childish
> >> without feeling, mainstream tagged. Kind of fast-food literature which
> >> is the contrary of what I call a good critic.
>
> > That would be your opinion. I would consider it a very poor one as
> > well, since you struggle with English.
>
> >>> And if it was worth something, someone
> >>> would be paying you to express it.
>
> >> LOL ! This is a prostitute point of view.
>
> > So everyone who works for money is a prostitute? That's the dumbest
> > thing I've ever heard.
>
> You are really to slow, to dense.
> This is not what it means, cretin. Read and read again your statement
> and my answer and there's a little chance that tomorrow morning...

Not only are you irrelevant, but you are simple as well. Maybe your
prostitution argument makes more sense in your country, where your
leader is married to one. But elsewhere, people learn skills so that
they can earn a living. Now you are trying to say that these people
are all prostitutes?

Are you a fat little welfare case, Lionel? Do you sit and wait for a
check from your prostitute government so that you can eat more creme
brulee? Do you shout to your neighbors from your bedroom window that
you are important because you have people in the United States hanging
on your every word? Do they respond by rolling their eyes and saying,
"That fat crazy man Lionel is at it again!"

I may read and reread this tomorrow morning, but I'm sure you'll still
sound like a fat little European who pretends to be important.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 22:51, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 3:33 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 04/02/2010 21:46, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 1:54 pm, > wrote:
>>>> Le 04/02/2010 20:10, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>> On Feb 4, 12:09 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>> Le 04/02/2010 17:10, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 4, 5:05 am, > wrote:
>>>>>>>> Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 21
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 22
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 23
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Philips' name disappear from staff list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 24
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 25
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - No Philips on staff list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0 contribution
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> him.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fair, fair...
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
>>>>>>>>>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
>>>>>>>>>>>> weight ! :-)
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> events is a bit surprising.
>>>>>>>>>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
>>>>>>>>>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
>>>>>>>>>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
>>>>>>>>>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
>>>>>>>>>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
>>>>>>>>>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
>>>>>>>>>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
>>>>>>>>>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> A bit antinomic no ?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But Bob Gendron,
>>>>>>>>>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bob Gendron was already at ToneAudio before you left. You have cohabited
>>>>>>>>>> on the issue 21.
>>>>>>>>>> Your "place" has been cancelled from the staff list. There's no more
>>>>>>>>>> "Senior contributing editor" on the issue 23.
>>>>>>>>>> Gendron's qualification change from "Contributing writer" to "Assistant
>>>>>>>>>> music editor".
>>>>>>>>>> Don't yo think it looks like a redevelopment, no ?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyway we will keep in mind this savourous coincidence : big fat Philips
>>>>>>>>>> left ToneAution and PDF files of the magazine lost 50% of their
>>>>>>>>>> weight...
>>
>>>>>>>>> You're still spouting nonsense in broken English and expecting us to
>>>>>>>>> know what you're talking about. What do you know...an Ugly Frenchman.
>>
>>>>>>>> Life is ugly, your lies are ugly...
>>
>>>>>>> There are no lies. You are simply trying to make something out of
>>>>>>> nothing.
>>
>>>>>>>> Why don't you tell us the true ? True is very simple : you have been
>>>>>>>> ejected from ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>>>> That is not true. That would be a lie.
>>
>>>>>> I don't believe you.
>>
>>>>> I don't care.
>>
>>>> So why do you answer ?
>>
>>> I didn't.
>>
>>>>>> In the normal world when someone arrive in a work group his future
>>>>>> colleagues say welcome.... This is what we can read on issue 21 page 7
>>>>>> for Bob Gendron, a short but friendly panegyric.
>>
>>>>>> In the normal world when a long time appreciated collaborator leave a
>>>>>> work group his ex-colleagues offer him their best wishes, good luck.
>>>>>> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>> Many people have left TONEAudio since its inception. Not once was
>>>>> there a fare thee well. So why should I be different?
>>
>>>> Because you also made the dishes. ;-)
>>
>>> That makes no sense in English.
>>
>>>>>> More important an advice is given to third parties to explain them the
>>>>>> situation...
>>>>>> I've not been able to find something similar on ToneAudio.
>>
>>>>> Let's say I was "ejected" from TONEAudio. Usually most people, when
>>>>> fired, are quick to badmouth a former employer. I haven't...because I
>>>>> left on good terms.
>>
>>>> What a bad excuse.
>>>> In your case the situation would be worst, it is clear you are not in
>>>> position to badmouth anybody.
>>
>>> That's not true. It is common behavior to badmouth an amployer after
>>> being let go. Very common.
>>
>>>>>>>> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.
>>
>>>>>>> You are? Prove it!
>>
>>>>>> Yes, I would never read two reviews from a guy who can write :
>>>>>> "(Sonny) Rollins has always been my favorite jazz saxophonist".
>>
>>>>>> Sonny Rollins is to the saxophone what a lumberjack is to the wood
>>>>>> sculpture. :-)
>>
>>>>> That would be you opinion.
>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>> This is why I would never read any more music review from you.
>>>> Considering the samples I found on TA I must say that they are childish
>>>> without feeling, mainstream tagged. Kind of fast-food literature which
>>>> is the contrary of what I call a good critic.
>>
>>> That would be your opinion. I would consider it a very poor one as
>>> well, since you struggle with English.
>>
>> What a lame excuse lazy cretin.
>
> I'm lazy because I can't decipher your horrible English? LOL!
>
>>
>>>>> And if it was worth something, someone
>>>>> would be paying you to express it.
>>
>>>> LOL ! This is a prostitute point of view.
>>
>>> So everyone who works for money is a prostitute? That's the dumbest
>>> thing I've ever heard.
>>
>>>>> So since your "points" have been discredited and now you're just
>>
>>>> Nothing has been discredited except you.
>>
>>> In your opinion, which doesn't matter to me.
>>
>> Zzzzzzzzzzzz....
>
> If you find me so boring, why do you keep responding to me?
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> making stuff up (why is that so common on RAO?),
>>
>>>> Don't spit in your soup, hypocrite ! This is why you are here. :-)
>>
>>> Um, no. Once you have proven that I have lied, then you can make that
>>> statement. Since you've only offered the whimsical opinion of a chubby
>>> little Frenchman, I'll reject the hypocrite label.
>>
>> Me chubby ? LOL !!!
>> I'm regularly biking and play handball. I recently stop marathon because
>> of tendinitis...
>
> I don't believe you. Handball is a cissy game,

Jealous

> and you probably ride
> on the back of a tandem bicycle while a more healthy friend pedals you
> around.

Jealous

> Tendinitis comes from improper conditioning

Sometime yes, sometime no.

> so clearly you
> are out of shape.

That will be true but I still have some years in front of me

>> But I'm magnanimous and I will excuse that since it's normal that the
>> fat diabetic red face I've seen on the internet few years ago could be
>> jealous of my pretty silhouette. ;-)
>
> What pretty sihouette? Being anonymous on the Internet allows you to
> make up big fantasy versions of yourself, no?

Nobody is no more anonymous on the internet. If you wasn't so stupid and
lazy you would surely find something.
Exactly the same way I have discovered that you have been ejected from
ToneAudio. :-)

> I'm sure your are
> ghastly. If you were attractive,

Are you pretending that one need to be ugly to waste time on RAO ?
IMHO if we check last years statistics you are surely very, very ugly. LOL.

> you wouldn't be wasting your time
> trying to speak English on a forum where no one understands what you
> are saying.

Except you. Thank you for your efforts !

> That is the sport of a huge, pimply French **** like
> yourself.

BLAH, BLAH, BLAH


>>
>>>>> it's time to tell you
>>>>> to mind your own ****ing business.
>>
>>>> You can tell what you want.-
>>
>>> We know you're French, we now know you're chubby, so feel free to
>>> elaborate.
>>
>> Why are you writing "we". Schizophrenia ? So much people in so large
>> body ? :-D-
>
> Of course not, silly. While a great many people here ignore you
> because you are fat, irreverant little troll, some do accidentally see
> your verbal diarrhea. In English, that necessitates the use of the
> pronoun "we."

But you are the only one to affirm that I am "chubby". Are you trying to
share you fantasy with RAO ghost ? Or is it an SOS ?

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 22:54, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 3:37 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 04/02/2010 22:18, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 3:12 pm, > wrote:
>>>> Le 04/02/2010 21:49, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>>> Just count in this thread how many time you have pretend to ignore me
>>>>>> and you are still answering.
>>
>>>>> I count zero.
>>
>>>> Learn to count
>>
>>> I learned how to count when I was three years old. Even then I could
>>> easily count up to the pounds that you must weigh now.
>>
>> Say big fat Phillips.
>
> Oh, I have touched a nerve.

Does it hurt ?

> When you were young you stayed slim. You
> were able to ride bikes and play handball. Now due to the tendonitis
> caused by your obvious obesity,

More than 30% of the American are obese.
Even the statistic are on my side.

> it's a chore to even type on your
> keyboard with your fat little fingers.

Good you sound exactly like in your music review.


> How sad, La Salope.

Asking help from George ?
LOL, What a coward you are.

[MiNe 109]

Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!

Stephen

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 23:06, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 3:53 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 04/02/2010 21:46, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>>> Note that I'm sure that TA readers don't miss you.
>>
>>>>>>> You are? Prove it!
>>
>>>>>> Yes, I would never read two reviews from a guy who can write :
>>>>>> "(Sonny) Rollins has always been my favorite jazz saxophonist".
>>
>>>>>> Sonny Rollins is to the saxophone what a lumberjack is to the wood
>>>>>> sculpture. :-)
>>
>>>>> That would be you opinion.
>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>> This is why I would never read any more music review from you.
>>>> Considering the samples I found on TA I must say that they are childish
>>>> without feeling, mainstream tagged. Kind of fast-food literature which
>>>> is the contrary of what I call a good critic.
>>
>>> That would be your opinion. I would consider it a very poor one as
>>> well, since you struggle with English.
>>
>>>>> And if it was worth something, someone
>>>>> would be paying you to express it.
>>
>>>> LOL ! This is a prostitute point of view.
>>
>>> So everyone who works for money is a prostitute? That's the dumbest
>>> thing I've ever heard.
>>
>> You are really to slow, to dense.
>> This is not what it means, cretin. Read and read again your statement
>> and my answer and there's a little chance that tomorrow morning...
>
> Not only are you irrelevant, but you are simple as well. Maybe your
> prostitution argument makes more sense in your country, where your
> leader is married to one.

I haven't any leader. You ?
BTW this kind of disgusting glamorous considerations are just good for
tabloid. Not that this would be a good job for a mediocre jobless
ex-music reviewer. ;-)

> But elsewhere, people learn skills so that
> they can earn a living. Now you are trying to say that these people
> are all prostitutes?

This is not what I wrote. I was just answering to your false statement :

"And if it was worth something, someone would be paying you to express it."

Earning money is not the crime.
The crime is to believe that only the things which have a price are
important.

Slow and dense...



> Are you a fat little welfare case, Lionel?

Thankfully not. Welfare is

> Do you sit and wait for a
> check

Not for the moment, I have the chance to have a job.

> from your prostitute government so that you can eat more creme
> brulee? Do you shout to your neighbors from your bedroom window that
> you are important because you have people in the United States hanging
> on your every word?

I SINCERELY hope that only you and me are reading all that. For any
other people it would be wasted time and energy

> Do they respond by rolling their eyes and saying,
> "That fat crazy man Lionel is at it again!"
>
> I may read and reread this tomorrow morning, but I'm sure you'll still
> sound like a fat little European who pretends to be important.

I have only the importance that you are granting me. Not more not less

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a écrit :
> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>
> Stephen

Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 4:13*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 22:51, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 3:33 pm, > *wrote:
> >> Le 04/02/2010 21:46, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> On Feb 4, 1:54 pm, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 04/02/2010 20:10, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>> On Feb 4, 12:09 pm, > * * *wrote:
> >>>>>> Le 04/02/2010 17:10, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 4, 5:05 am, > * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Le 04/02/2010 01:22, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 12:05 pm, > * * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Le 03/02/2010 16:51, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 5:32 am, > * * * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 21:01, cal coolidge a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 12:40 pm, > * * * * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 02/02/2010 16:12, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I dropped in on RAO yesterday for the first time in many months because
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I heard that Marc Phillips was libeling me - blaming me because he lost his
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job at ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That would be a lie.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 21
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- 5 contributions (or co-contributions)
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 22
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- senior contributing editor : Marc Philips (oblivion ? misprint ?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 23
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- Philips' name disappear from staff list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 24
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 25
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Issue 26
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- No Philips on staff list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * * * * *- 0 contribution
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I confirmed some time ago that I had left TONE. It's been common
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge for months. Arny's lie is that I "lost my job" because of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> him.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, there is no link to Arny's harrassing of Jeff Dorgay and my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> decision to leave. There is no link between RAO and my decision to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> leave, period. Hence, Arny lied once again.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Fair, fair...
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> But I bet that attentive and perspicacious readers will have noted that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> since you have left ToneAudio the PDF Files have lost about 50% of their
> >>>>>>>>>>>> weight ! :-)
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1 - More than being simply an amusing fact, the concomitance of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> events is a bit surprising.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In industry and more generally in business this kind of 'forced diet' is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> often the external sign of drastic changes and cost reductions. Small
> >>>>>>>>>>>> clues, tiny indications are often the best information about the health
> >>>>>>>>>>>> of customers, competitors, suppliers...
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2 - It is also interesting that despite your "departure" the editorial
> >>>>>>>>>>>> content remains the same (about 150 pages). This could lead to think
> >>>>>>>>>>>> that your succession didn't put any problem to ToneAudio.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In conclusion and IMHO I would not be surprised that "your decision to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> leave" has been taken by somebody else.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ToneAudio, a lean enterprise...;-)
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I could comment, but none of this makes any sense.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> A bit antinomic no ?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> But Bob Gendron,
> >>>>>>>>>>> formerly of the Absolute Sound, did take my place after I left.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 4:15*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> >>> On Feb 4, 3:12 pm, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 04/02/2010 21:49, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>>> Just count in this thread how many time you have pretend to ignore me
> >>>>>> and you are still answering.
>
> >>>>> I count zero.
>
> >>>> Learn to count
>
> >>> I learned how to count when I was three years old. Even then I could
> >>> easily count up to the pounds that you must weigh now.
>
> >> Say big fat Phillips.
>
> > Oh, I have touched a nerve.
>
> Does it hurt ?

It's your nerve, Lionel. You tell me! LOL!

>
> > When you were young you stayed slim. You
> > were able to ride bikes and play handball. Now due to the tendonitis
> > caused by your obvious obesity,
>
> More than 30% of the American are obese.
> Even the statistic are on my side.

Yes, Lionel, they are. But 70% of them are not.

You, on the other hand, are an anomaly...a fat little Frenchman. Oui!
>
> > it's a chore to even type on your
> > keyboard with your fat little fingers.
>
> Good you sound exactly like in your music review.

I do? How do fat fingers sound in a music review? Or does that make
more sense in French, Lionel le porcine?

>
> > How sad, La Salope.
>
> Asking help from George ?
> LOL, What a coward you are.

No, I am not. Are you asking for help from your French-English
Dictionary? It is failing you!

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 4:15*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>
> Stephen

LOL! Yes, I was going to get around to that.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 4:33*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> > Not only are you irrelevant, but you are simple as well. Maybe your
> > prostitution argument makes more sense in your country, where your
> > leader is married to one.
>
> I haven't any leader. You ?

France does not have a leader? Who is running the country?

> BTW this kind of disgusting glamorous considerations are just good for
> tabloid. Not that this would be a good job for a mediocre jobless
> ex-music reviewer. ;-)

But I am not an ex-reviewer. I currently write for two other music
publications! And I have many jobs.

From your fantasy version of me, I can deduce that you are both
jobless and would love to write music reviews but lack the writing
skills, even in French.

>
> > But elsewhere, people learn skills so that
> > they can earn a living. Now you are trying to say that these people
> > are all prostitutes?
>
> This is not what I wrote. I was just answering to your false statement :
>
> "And if it was worth something, someone would be paying you to express it.."

And again you grasp of English is faltering. My comments are spot on.
You are the one playing catch up. With your hefty, billowing buttocks,
it may take you a while to do that.

>
> Earning money is not the crime.
> The crime is to believe that only the things which have a price are
> important.

That is true. Your application of that is false.

>
> Slow and dense...

Again with the Ugly Frenchman platitudes? Oh, Lionel...have another
bucketful of creme brulee.

>
> > Are you a fat little welfare case, Lionel?
>
> Thankfully not. Welfare is

Welfare is what, Lionel? Your highest goal in life? The realization of
a dream?

>
> > Do you sit and wait for a
> > check
>
> Not for the moment, I have the chance to have a job.

So they do not pay you?

>
> > from your prostitute government so that you can eat more creme
> > brulee? Do you shout to your neighbors from your bedroom window that
> > you are important because you have people in the United States hanging
> > on your every word?
>
> I SINCERELY hope that only you and me are reading all that. For any
> other people it would be wasted time and energy

No, as Stephen implied, we have an audience. Why aren't people coming
to your rescue? Is it because you are a little French gnat on the
buttocks of RAO?

>
> > Do they respond by rolling their eyes and saying,
> > "That fat crazy man Lionel is at it again!"
>
> > I may read and reread this tomorrow morning, but I'm sure you'll still
> > sound like a fat little European who pretends to be important.
>
> I have only the importance that you are granting me. Not more not less.

You are not important. You are my plaything for today. I pull the
string and you spin around and around!

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 4, 4:35*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a écrit :
>
> > Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>
> > Stephen
>
> Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D

That's not what he was talking about, Lionel. If you could speak
English, it would be obvious!

Again, I think that a fat little Frenchman wasting a large chunk of
his day arguing in a language he cannot understand is the mark of an
inbred Parisian poodle. Yap yap yap, dance around, whine when you
kicked in the tail. Woof!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 4, 4:15*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!

I can't read Lionel any more.

I failed Gibberish 101 in school and never retook it.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On Feb 4, 4:15*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>
> I can't read Lionel any more.
>
> I failed Gibberish 101 in school and never retook it.

I kept retaking it under different titles.

Stephen

[GeoSynch]

Marc 'fat happy slob' Phillips blubbered:

> ...you are fat, irreverant [sic] little troll.... In English

Yes, in English, if you please, doughboy.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon blithered:

> [Gendron] probably doesn't help with administrative tasks, either.

Translation: Bob doesn't fetch lunches for the staff, something that was Marc
Phillips' primary responsibility at Tone.

[GeoSynch]

BaBoon preened:

> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.

You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy George
and fag-hag Jilly.

Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 05:28, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 4:15 pm, MiNe > wrote:
>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>
> I can't read Lionel any more.
>
> I failed Gibberish 101 in school and never retook it.

Don't waste your time. Not only it's nearly impossible to read but I
seriously doubt that something could interest you.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 06:06, MiNe 109 a écrit :
> In article
> >,
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to > wrote:
>
>> On Feb 4, 4:15 pm, MiNe > wrote:
>>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>>
>> I can't read Lionel any more.
>>
>> I failed Gibberish 101 in school and never retook it.
>
> I kept retaking it under different titles.

Stephen, your thoroughness never ceases to amaze me.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 00:28, Boon a écrit :

> You are my plaything for today. I pull the
> string and you spin around and around!

Marc Phillips in an onanist exhibition.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 00:20, Boon a écrit :

> Are you asking for help from your French-English
> Dictionary? It is failing you!

I know but I insist. BTW as long as this make you ranting...

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :

> ...people who call other people fat are usually fat
> themselves.

The simple life of Marc Phillips... no comment.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 00:16, BigBoon a écrit :

> people who call other people fat are usually fat
> themselves.

The simple life of Marc Phillips... No comment.
I guess that this axiom also applies to you, eh Marc

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 00:30, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 4:35 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a écrit :
>>
>>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>>
>>> Stephen
>>
>> Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D
>
> That's not what he was talking about, Lionel. If you could speak
> English, it would be obvious!

I was sharing the 'your' with my main interlocutor.
The miss the point BoonBoon, once again. :-(

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 00:30, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 4, 4:35 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a écrit :
>>
>>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>>
>>> Stephen
>>
>> Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D
>
> That's not what he was talking about, Lionel. If you could speak
> English, it would be obvious!

I was just sharing the 'your' with my main interlocutor.
Slow and dense...

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :

> I feel strong and healthy today,

So, Mrs Phillips will finally get her annual kick. Have fun ! ;-)

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
"GeoSynch" > wrote:

> BaBoon preened:
>
> > I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>
> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> George
> and fag-hag Jilly.
>
> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)

|-----|

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 5:09*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 00:28, Boon a écrit :
>
> > You are my plaything for today. I pull the
> > string and you spin around and around!
>
> Marc Phillips in an onanist exhibition.

Again, that doesn't make sense. If I'm pulling your string, I can't be
an onanist.

But I'm glad you came back so I can toy with you some more.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 5:12*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 00:20, Boon a écrit :
>
> > Are you asking for help from your French-English
> > Dictionary? It is failing you!
>
> I know but I insist. BTW as long as this make you ranting...

Not ranting, but laughing, ridiculing, poking fun...

You are my new dartboard, Lionel.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 5:17*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :
>
> > ...people who call other people fat are usually fat
> > themselves.
>
> The simple life of Marc Phillips... no comment.

So you are fat! Good!

Now let's talk about how badly you smell. Frenchman are famous for
their stench. A friend of mine recently went to Paris, and she
remarked that every French male stank to high heaven.

Is that why you are lonely and post on RAO? No woman will come near
you?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 5:21*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, BigBoon a écrit :
>
> > people who call other people fat are usually fat
> > themselves.
>
> The simple life of Marc Phillips... No comment.
> I guess that this axiom also applies to you, eh Marc

Why did you repeat yourself, Lionel? Nervous? Agitated?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 5:25*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 00:30, Boon a crit :
>
> > On Feb 4, 4:35 pm, > *wrote:
> >> Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a crit :
>
> >>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>
> >>> Stephen
>
> >> Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D
>
> > That's not what he was talking about, Lionel. If you could speak
> > English, it would be obvious!
>
> I was sharing the 'your' with my main interlocutor.
> The miss the point BoonBoon, once again. :-(

You have no points to make, Lionel! You just make up things out of
thin air and post them, hoping someone will cure your loneliness. Poor
Lionel.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 5:27*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 00:30, Boon a écrit :
>
> > On Feb 4, 4:35 pm, > *wrote:
> >> Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a écrit :
>
> >>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>
> >>> Stephen
>
> >> Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D
>
> > That's not what he was talking about, Lionel. If you could speak
> > English, it would be obvious!
>
> I was just sharing the 'your' with my main interlocutor.
> Slow and dense...

Repeating yourself again! My, you are having fits today! Poor fat,
stinky Lionel.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 5:35*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :
>
> > I feel strong and healthy today,
>
> So, Mrs Phillips will finally get her annual kick. Have fun ! ;-)

Too bad you are too fat and stinky to attract women, Lionel.
Fortunately you have us at RAO to help you pass your lonely days!

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 9:30*am, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
>
> *"GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > BaBoon preened:
>
> > > I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>
> > You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> > George
> > and fag-hag Jilly.
>
> > Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
>
> |-----|

That's a funny statement, because PLF once commented that he didn't
think I was good looking. That's not something a straight guy would
say.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 16:30, Jenn a écrit :
> In >,
> > wrote:
>
>> BaBoon preened:
>>
>>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>>
>> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
>> George
>> and fag-hag Jilly.
>>
>> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
>
> |-----|

Politically incorrect ?
I bet that this is not the worst thing you have read on RAO.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 17:15, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 5:09 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 00:28, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> You are my plaything for today. I pull the
>>> string and you spin around and around!
>>
>> Marc Phillips in an onanist exhibition.
>
> Again, that doesn't make sense. If I'm pulling your string, I can't be
> an onanist.

False, you're still playing alone. :-)

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 17:16, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 5:12 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 00:20, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> Are you asking for help from your French-English
>>> Dictionary? It is failing you!
>>
>> I know but I insist. BTW as long as this make you ranting...
>
> Not ranting, but laughing, ridiculing, poking fun...
>
> You are my new dartboard, Lionel.


Good, this change you from being an ass licker.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 17:18, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 5:17 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> ...people who call other people fat are usually fat
>>> themselves.
>>
>> The simple life of Marc Phillips... no comment.
>
> So you are fat! Good!
>
> Now let's talk about how badly you smell. Frenchman are famous for
> their stench. A friend of mine recently went to Paris, and she
> remarked that every French male stank to high heaven.

A lesbian for sure.

> Is that why you are lonely and post on RAO? No woman will come near
> you?

You are spending so much time on RAO that I prefer to return you the
question.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 17:19, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 5:21 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, BigBoon a écrit :
>>
>>> people who call other people fat are usually fat
>>> themselves.
>>
>> The simple life of Marc Phillips... No comment.
>> I guess that this axiom also applies to you, eh Marc
>
> Why did you repeat yourself, Lionel? Nervous? Agitated?

????

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 17:20, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 5:25 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 00:30, Boon a crit :
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 4:35 pm, > wrote:
>>>> Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a crit :
>>
>>>>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>>
>>>>> Stephen
>>
>>>> Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D
>>
>>> That's not what he was talking about, Lionel. If you could speak
>>> English, it would be obvious!
>>
>> I was sharing the 'your' with my main interlocutor.
>> The miss the point BoonBoon, once again. :-(
>
> You have no points to make, Lionel!

LOL, you are so persuasive.
I am desesperate.

> You just make up things out of
> thin air and post them, hoping someone will cure your loneliness. Poor
> Lionel.

Please stop or you will have support the responsibility of my suicide. ;-)

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 17:20, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 5:27 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 00:30, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 4:35 pm, > wrote:
>>>> Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a écrit :
>>
>>>>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>>
>>>>> Stephen
>>
>>>> Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D
>>
>>> That's not what he was talking about, Lionel. If you could speak
>>> English, it would be obvious!
>>
>> I was just sharing the 'your' with my main interlocutor.
>> Slow and dense...
>
> Repeating yourself again! My, you are having fits today! Poor fat,
> stinky Lionel.

?????

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 17:21, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 5:35 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> I feel strong and healthy today,
>>
>> So, Mrs Phillips will finally get her annual kick. Have fun ! ;-)
>
> Too bad you are too fat and stinky to attract women, Lionel.

I don't attract women, I'm just charming them.

> Fortunately you have us at RAO to help you pass your lonely days!

Maximum one or two weeks a year.
I'm afraid that if you want to evaluate one's sexual problems by a ratio
of his presence on RAO you will have a lot of problem to excuse
yourself... You should be prudent to where you are putting your feet...
You "Ex" fat-boy. ;-)

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 17:23, Boon a écrit :

> That's not something a straight guy would
> say.

Are you joking or are you really a simpleton ?

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 16:30, Jenn a écrit :
> In >,
> > wrote:
>
>> BaBoon preened:
>>
>>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>>
>> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
>> George
>> and fag-hag Jilly.
>>
>> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
>
> |-----|

I don't know who you are Madam but here you're implicitly make the
choice to defend the guy who has written :

"is for the same sport for people who cannot afford a racquet. That's
what the children play in the slums."

This blind asshole is just forgetting that 50% of the records he is
reviewing are issued by guy who are coming from the slums.
Is it the world you want ?
Are you forgetting your artist persona for immediate arrangement ?

IMHO you're just a "mijaurée", sorry but I haven't found an acceptable
translation on the Internet.
Note that to have a diner with the devil, you need to have a very long
spoon.
Take care of you.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 11:39*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 17:15, Boon a écrit :
>
> > On Feb 5, 5:09 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 00:28, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> You are my plaything for today. I pull the
> >>> string and you spin around and around!
>
> >> Marc Phillips in an onanist exhibition.
>
> > Again, that doesn't make sense. If I'm pulling your string, I can't be
> > an onanist.
>
> False, you're still playing alone. :-)

No, you are playing with me. With every one of your responses, you are
my plaything. Are you too dumb to know that 1 + 1 = 2?

Because fat, stinky and dumb is no way to go through life, Lionel.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 11:40*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 17:16, Boon a écrit :
>
> > On Feb 5, 5:12 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 00:20, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> Are you asking for help from your French-English
> >>> Dictionary? It is failing you!
>
> >> I know but I insist. BTW as long as this make you ranting...
>
> > Not ranting, but laughing, ridiculing, poking fun...
>
> > You are my new dartboard, Lionel.
>
> Good, this change you from being an ass licker.

Ass licker? Really. Are you randomly picking out words from your
dictionary? Do you know what "ass licker" means in English?

Probably not. As someone who is fat, stinky and dumb, you cannot
possibly understand American idioms.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 11:42*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 17:18, Boon a écrit :
>
> > On Feb 5, 5:17 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> ...people who call other people fat are usually fat
> >>> themselves.
>
> >> The simple life of Marc Phillips... no comment.
>
> > So you are fat! Good!
>
> > Now let's talk about how badly you smell. Frenchman are famous for
> > their stench. A friend of mine recently went to Paris, and she
> > remarked that every French male stank to high heaven.
>
> A lesbian for sure.

I know for sure that she is not. But thank you for confirming your
stench.

>
> > Is that why you are lonely and post on RAO? No woman will come near
> > you?
>
> You are spending so much time on RAO that I prefer to return you the
> question.

I'm sure you would. Your own life is so pathetic that it wouldn't last
20 seconds under RAO's magnifying glass.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 11:42*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 17:19, Boon a écrit :
>
> > On Feb 5, 5:21 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, BigBoon a écrit :
>
> >>> people who call other people fat are usually fat
> >>> themselves.
>
> >> The simple life of Marc Phillips... No comment.
> >> I guess that this axiom also applies to you, eh Marc
>
> > Why did you repeat yourself, Lionel? Nervous? Agitated?
>
> ????

Oh, confused! That's the word!

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 11:45*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 17:20, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 5, 5:25 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 00:30, Boon a crit :
>
> >>> On Feb 4, 4:35 pm, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a crit :
>
> >>>>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>
> >>>>> Stephen
>
> >>>> Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D
>
> >>> That's not what he was talking about, Lionel. If you could speak
> >>> English, it would be obvious!
>
> >> I was sharing the 'your' with my main interlocutor.
> >> The miss the point BoonBoon, once again. :-(
>
> > You have no points to make, Lionel!
>
> LOL, you are so persuasive.
> I am desesperate.

You are? You are desesperate to make no points? Oh, you are confused.

>
> > You just make up things out of
> > thin air and post them, hoping someone will cure your loneliness. Poor
> > Lionel.
>
> Please stop or you will have support the responsibility of my suicide. ;-)-

Nope. I will laugh at another RAO drama queen who can dish it out but
can't take it.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 11:46*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 17:20, Boon a crit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 5, 5:27 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 00:30, Boon a crit :
>
> >>> On Feb 4, 4:35 pm, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 04/02/2010 23:15, MiNe 109 a crit :
>
> >>>>> Speaking of overweight, for the benefit of your tiny readership, trim!
>
> >>>>> Stephen
>
> >>>> Marc Phillips is pathologically immodest. :-D
>
> >>> That's not what he was talking about, Lionel. If you could speak
> >>> English, it would be obvious!
>
> >> I was just sharing the 'your' with my main interlocutor.
> >> Slow and dense...
>
> > Repeating yourself again! My, you are having fits today! Poor fat,
> > stinky Lionel.
>
> ?????-

See...this underlines the futility of your participation on RAO. Very
funny!

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 11:53*am, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 17:21, Boon a écrit :
>
> > On Feb 5, 5:35 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> I feel strong and healthy today,
>
> >> So, Mrs Phillips will finally get her annual kick. Have fun ! ;-)
>
> > Too bad you are too fat and stinky to attract women, Lionel.
>
> I don't attract women, I'm just charming them.

I love how you make fun of yourself all the time. I guess the only way
to avoid being a total loser is to be self-deprecating, no?

>
> > Fortunately you have us at RAO to help you pass your lonely days!
>
> Maximum one or two weeks a year.

You spend one or two weeks a year totally lonely? That's sad.

> I'm afraid that if you want to evaluate one's sexual problems by a ratio
> of his presence on RAO you will have a lot of problem to excuse
> yourself... You should be prudent to where you are putting your feet...
> You "Ex" fat-boy. ;-)

No, Lionel...you are ignoring the obvious. For instance, look at the
thread abour horn speakers. That is the real RAO, where I chat with
friendly people about audio and music. You, however, do not
participate in those threads. Your time on RAO is spent trying to
troll. Therefore the equation for you is very different, no?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 12:02*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 17:23, Boon a écrit :
>
> > That's not something a straight guy would
> > say.
>
> Are you joking or are you really a simpleton ?

No, I'm American. If you want to speak for fat, stinky effeminate
Frenchmen like you, go ahead.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 1:57*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 16:30, Jenn a crit :
>
> > In >,
> > * > *wrote:
>
> >> BaBoon preened:
>
> >>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>
> >> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> >> George
> >> and fag-hag Jilly.
>
> >> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
>
> > |-----|
>
> I don't know who you are Madam but here you're implicitly make the
> choice to defend the guy who has written :
>
> "is for the same sport for people who cannot afford a racquet. That's
> what the children play in the slums."
>
> This blind asshole is just forgetting that 50% of the records he is
> reviewing are issued by guy who are coming from the slums.
> Is it the world you want ?
> Are you forgetting your artist persona for immediate arrangement *?
>
> IMHO you're just a "mijaur e", sorry but I haven't found an acceptable
> translation on the Internet.
> Note that to have a diner with the devil, you need to have a very long
> spoon.
> Take care of you.

You should try to get closer to GeoSynch. You two have a lot in
common. You're both largely ignored by the real world, you're both
effeminate and you both fantasize that I'm a loser. Bon voyage!

[Clyde Slick]

On Feb 5, 2:57*pm, Lionel > wrote:

>
> I don't know who you are Madam but here you're implicitly make the
> choice to defend the guy who has written :
>
> "is for the same sport for people who cannot afford a racquet. That's
> what the children play in the slums."
>
> This blind asshole is just forgetting that 50% of the records he is
> reviewing are issued by guy who are coming from the slums.
> Is it the world you want ?
> Are you forgetting your artist persona for immediate arrangement *?
>
> IMHO you're just a "mijaur e", sorry but I haven't found an acceptable
> translation on the Internet.
> Note that to have a diner with the devil, you need to have a very long
> spoon.
> Take care of you.

Lionel suffers from excessive use of internet translators,
which upon experimentation, further mangled his response to be this:

I do not know who you are lady, but here he is making an implicit
decision
to protect the guy who wrote
"the same sport for people who can not afford the club. This is what
the children play in the slums.
This idiotic only blind to forget that 50% of the cases should be
regarded as the origin of the type that comes in the slums.
This is the world do you want?
forgotten artist immediate termination?
IMHO, you e 'mijaur "I'm sorry, but I have not found an acceptable
translation on the Internet.
Please note that dinner in the devil, to be a very long spoon.

Give Lionel credit, "At Least" he tires to communicate with us in
English
Take care of yourself.

[hophead]

In article <2480ddd6-c261-47b9-8f32-e85acbaca105
@q30g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>, says...
>
> I do not know who you are lady, but here he is making an implicit
> decision
> to protect the guy who wrote
> "the same sport for people who can not afford the club. This is what
> the children play in the slums.
> This idiotic only blind to forget that 50% of the cases should be
> regarded as the origin of the type that comes in the slums.

[ rest snipped...]

LOL! That's good stuff Clyde.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 5, 12:22*am, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> BaBoon preened:
>
> > I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>
> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy George
> and fag-hag Jilly.
>
> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)

"Beauty secrets"?

We bathe regularly and floss. You should try it sometime.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> Le 05/02/2010 16:30, Jenn a écrit :
> > In >,
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> BaBoon preened:
> >>
> >>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
> >>
> >> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> >> George
> >> and fag-hag Jilly.
> >>
> >> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
> >
> > |-----|
>
> I don't know who you are Madam but here you're implicitly make the
> choice to defend the guy who has written :

I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the male
parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation of
others.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
Lionel > wrote:

> Le 05/02/2010 16:30, Jenn a écrit :
> > In >,
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> BaBoon preened:
> >>
> >>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
> >>
> >> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> >> George
> >> and fag-hag Jilly.
> >>
> >> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
> >
> > |-----|
>
> Politically incorrect ?
> I bet that this is not the worst thing you have read on RAO.

Politics has nothing to do with it.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 4:43*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2:57*pm, Lionel > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I don't know who you are Madam but here you're implicitly make the
> > choice to defend the guy who has written :
>
> > "is for the same sport for people who cannot afford a racquet. That's
> > what the children play in the slums."
>
> > This blind asshole is just forgetting that 50% of the records he is
> > reviewing are issued by guy who are coming from the slums.
> > Is it the world you want ?
> > Are you forgetting your artist persona for immediate arrangement *?
>
> > IMHO you're just a "mijaur e", sorry but I haven't found an acceptable
> > translation on the Internet.
> > Note that to have a diner with the devil, you need to have a very long
> > spoon.
> > Take care of you.
>
> Lionel suffers from excessive use of internet translators,
> which upon experimentation, further mangled his response to be this:
>
> I do not know who you are lady, but here he is making an implicit
> decision
> to protect the guy who wrote
> "the same sport for people who can not afford the club. This is what
> the children play in the slums.
> This idiotic only blind to forget that 50% of the cases should be
> regarded as the origin of the type that comes in the slums.
> This is the world do you want?
> forgotten artist immediate termination?
> IMHO, you e 'mijaur "I'm sorry, but I have not found an acceptable
> translation on the Internet.
> Please note that dinner in the devil, to be a very long spoon.
>
> Give Lionel credit, "At Least" he tires to communicate with us in
> English
> Take care of yourself.

But I totally understand that!

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 8:19*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 12:22*am, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > BaBoon preened:
>
> > > I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>
> > You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy George
> > and fag-hag Jilly.
>
> > Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
>
> "Beauty secrets"?
>
> We bathe regularly and floss. You should try it sometime.

I think PLF must identify with a fat, smelly little Frenchman like
Lionel. Together they can wonder why women won't go anywhere near them.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 8:29*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Lionel > wrote:
> > Le 05/02/2010 16:30, Jenn a écrit :
> > > In >,
> > > * > *wrote:
>
> > >> BaBoon preened:
>
> > >>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>
> > >> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> > >> George
> > >> and fag-hag Jilly.
>
> > >> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
>
> > > |-----|
>
> > I don't know who you are Madam but here you're implicitly make the
> > choice to defend the guy who has written :
>
> I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the male
> parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation of
> others.

I admit to some guilt in doing the same in this thread. But my problem
with PLF isn't that he's gay, it's that he attacks others for being
gay while being gay himself. If he came out and told everyone he's
gay, then I would actually give him some credit for once.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 5, 8:29*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Lionel > wrote:
> > Le 05/02/2010 16:30, Jenn a écrit :
> > > In >,
> > > * > *wrote:
>
> > >> BaBoon preened:
>
> > >>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>
> > >> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> > >> George
> > >> and fag-hag Jilly.
>
> > >> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
>
> > > |-----|
>
> > I don't know who you are Madam but here you're implicitly make the
> > choice to defend the guy who has written :
>
> I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the male
> parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation of
> others.

I think you were too kind to him.

|--|

OK, that cover length. Now let's look at girth:

o

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 5, 10:06*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 8:29*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article >,
>
> > *Lionel > wrote:
> > > Le 05/02/2010 16:30, Jenn a écrit :
> > > > In >,
> > > > * > *wrote:
>
> > > >> BaBoon preened:
>
> > > >>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>
> > > >> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> > > >> George
> > > >> and fag-hag Jilly.
>
> > > >> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
>
> > > > |-----|
>
> > > I don't know who you are Madam but here you're implicitly make the
> > > choice to defend the guy who has written :
>
> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the male
> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation of
> > others.
>
> I think you were too kind to him.
>
> |--|
>
> OK, that cover length. Now let's look at girth:
>
> o

I think YOU are being too kind. Let's take a look at that girth again:

..

[GeoSynch]

Bumbling Buffoon tries ye olde verbal jiu jitsu:

> > >>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.

> > >> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> > >> George and fag-hag Jilly.

> > >> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)

> [M]y problem with PLF isn't that he's gay, it's that he attacks others for
> being gay while being gay himself. If he came out and told everyone he's gay,
> then I would actually give him some credit for once.

Sorry, but no sale, Gail.

You're the one who openly cavorts with known homosexuals.

And now you're beginning to sound like one yourself prattling on about your
"lovely skin".

They've successfully co-opted you and are on the verge of converting you.

So, what do you do? Try one of your lame "IKYABWAI" response that's even limper
than Boy George's wrists. LoL!

[GeoSynch]

Jilly opens her gaping piehole:

> > >>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.

> > >> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> > >> George and fag-hag Jilly.

> > >> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)


> I think you were too kind to him.

> OK, that cover length. Now let's look at girth:

Considering that big mouth of yours, practically anything would seem Vienna
Sausage-sized to a Blowjob Queen like you.

[GeoSynch]

Jenn dreamt:

> I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the male parts
> of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation of others.

Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.

Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of Ellen
Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're too far
gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 6, 7:50*pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Jilly opens her gaping piehole:
>
> > > >>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
> > > >> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
> > > >> George and fag-hag Jilly.
> > > >> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
> > I think you were too kind to him.
> > OK, that cover length. Now let's look at girth:
>
> Considering that big mouth of yours, practically anything would seem Vienna
> Sausage-sized to a Blowjob Queen like you.

I suppose you're happy now that you've ruined RAO for everybody.

But thanks for the tacit admission that my depiction of the 'scale'
your 'manhood' was spot-on.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
Tiny > wrote:

> Jenn dreamt:
>
> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the male
> > parts
> > of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation of others.
>
> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.

No, it's what YOU yearn for. I was probably being kind.

>
> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of Ellen
> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're too far
> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".

lol, good one.

[GeoSynch]

Jenn craved:

> Tiny > wrote:

"Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky.

>> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the male
>> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation of
>> > others.

>> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.

> No, it's what YOU yearn for.

To pork you with a small penis? "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
but having been bitten once is now twice shy.

> I was probably being kind.

I agree you're being kind of kooky.

>> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of Ellen
>> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're too far
>> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".

> lol, good one.

We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
"GeoSynch" > wrote:

> Jenn craved:
>
> > Tiny > wrote:
>
> "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky.

That's correct.

>
> >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the male
> >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation of
> >> > others.
>
> >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
>
> > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
>
> To pork you with a small penis?

No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
little drawing that I made.

> "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"

Whatever turns you on.

> but having been bitten once is now twice shy.

You are entitled to your fantasies.

>
> > I was probably being kind.
>
> I agree you're being kind of kooky.
>
> >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of Ellen
> >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're too
> >> far
> >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
>
> > lol, good one.
>
> We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.

Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your life
last?

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 6, 7:33*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> >
> > *"GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > Jenn craved:
> >
> > > > Tiny > wrote:
> >
> > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky.
> >
> > That's correct.
> >
> >
> >
> > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the
> > > >> > male
> > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation
> > > >> > of
> > > >> > others.
> >
> > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
> >
> > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
> >
> > > To pork you with a small penis?
> >
> > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
> > little drawing that I made.
> >
> > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
> >
> > Whatever turns you on.
> >
> > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
> >
> > You are entitled to your fantasies.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > I was probably being kind.
> >
> > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
> >
> > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of
> > > >> Ellen
> > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're
> > > >> too
> > > >> far
> > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
> >
> > > > lol, good one.
> >
> > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
> >
> > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your life
> > last?
>
> Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> GMAFB, I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> for the field of psychology.
>
> ScottW

As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
defend issues that are of particular importance to me. The innocent
facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue. Perhaps for
you, it's not. So don't read it.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 7, 1:52*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
>
> > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > Jenn craved:
>
> > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
>
> > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky..
>
> > > > That's correct.
>
> > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the
> > > > > >> > male
> > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation
> > > > > >> > of
> > > > > >> > others.
>
> > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
>
> > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
>
> > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
>
> > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
> > > > little drawing that I made.
>
> > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
>
> > > > Whatever turns you on.
>
> > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
>
> > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
>
> > > > > > I was probably being kind.
>
> > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
>
> > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of
> > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're
> > > > > >> too
> > > > > >> far
> > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
>
> > > > > > lol, good one.
>
> > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
>
> > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your life
> > > > last?
>
> > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > for the field of psychology.
>
> > > ScottW
>
> > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
>
> *Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> I don't think that really helped your cause.
>
> > *The innocent
> > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
>
> *So your going to grill Geo in hypocritical fashion rather than
> grant him the rights you demand.
> Way to take the high road.
>
> >*Perhaps for
> > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
>
> You, like Phillips, will spam away which really doesn't bother me.

It's not spam, you idiot. Is this another case where your definition
of a word is different than everyone else's on the planet. Flaming,
yes. Trolling, yes. Not spamming. If two people are going back and
forth, it's not spamming. If someone constantly posts OT topics with
little or no repsonse from the others, THAT'S spamming.

> It's the hypocritical nature of it and your willingness to be
> what you claim to despise that I find distasteful.
-

I find that we all bow in deference to you when it comes to hypocrisy.
You were NEVER here to discuss audio. NEVER. You just wanted to splash
around in the pool like everyone else, and you got all testy when you
discovered you couldn't swim.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> >
> > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > Jenn craved:
> >
> > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
> >
> > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky.
> >
> > > > That's correct.
> >
> > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of
> > > > > >> > the
> > > > > >> > male
> > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual
> > > > > >> > orientation
> > > > > >> > of
> > > > > >> > others.
> >
> > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
> >
> > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
> >
> > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
> >
> > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
> > > > little drawing that I made.
> >
> > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
> >
> > > > Whatever turns you on.
> >
> > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
> >
> > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
> >
> > > > > > I was probably being kind.
> >
> > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
> >
> > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches
> > > > > >> of
> > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as
> > > > > >> you're
> > > > > >> too
> > > > > >> far
> > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
> >
> > > > > > lol, good one.
> >
> > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
> >
> > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your
> > > > life
> > > > last?
> >
> > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > for the field of psychology.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
>
> Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> I don't think that really helped your cause.

Your right. I should have just been straight forward and called him a
bigot.

>
> > *The innocent
> > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
>
> So your going to grill Geo

One question is "grilling". lol

> in hypocritical fashion rather than
> grant him the rights you demand.
> Way to take the high road.

Of what "rights" are you referring?
Oops! I grilled you!

>
> >*Perhaps for
> > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
>
> You, like Phillips, will spam away

You understand that by responding to my post to Geo, you have spammed in
the same way that you accuse me of doing, don't you? You have no
self-awareness whatsoever.

> which really doesn't bother me.
> It's the hypocritical nature of it

In what way am I being hypocritical?

> and your willingness to be
> what you claim to despise that I find distasteful.

When have I ever said that it's wrong to defend your beliefs?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 7, 3:12*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > >,
>
> > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > In article >,
>
> > > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > > Jenn craved:
>
> > > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
>
> > > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky.
>
> > > > > That's correct.
>
> > > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of
> > > > > > >> > the
> > > > > > >> > male
> > > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual
> > > > > > >> > orientation
> > > > > > >> > of
> > > > > > >> > others.
>
> > > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster..
>
> > > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
>
> > > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
>
> > > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
> > > > > little drawing that I made.
>
> > > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
>
> > > > > Whatever turns you on.
>
> > > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
>
> > > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
>
> > > > > > > I was probably being kind.
>
> > > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
>
> > > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches
> > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as
> > > > > > >> you're
> > > > > > >> too
> > > > > > >> far
> > > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
>
> > > > > > > lol, good one.
>
> > > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
>
> > > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your
> > > > > life
> > > > > last?
>
> > > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > > for the field of psychology.
>
> > > > ScottW
>
> > > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
>
> > *Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> > I don't think that really helped your cause.
>
> Your right. *I should have just been straight forward and called him a
> bigot.
>
>
>
> > > *The innocent
> > > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
>
> > *So your going to grill Geo
>
> One question is "grilling". *lol
>
> > in hypocritical fashion rather than
> > grant him the rights you demand.
> > Way to take the high road.
>
> Of what "rights" are you referring?
> Oops! *I grilled you!
>
>
>
> > >*Perhaps for
> > > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
>
> > You, like Phillips, will spam away
>
> You understand that by responding to my post to Geo, you have spammed in
> the same way that you accuse me of doing, don't you? *You have no
> self-awareness whatsoever.
>
> > which really doesn't bother me.
> > It's the hypocritical nature of it
>
> In what way am I being hypocritical?
>
> > and your willingness to be
> > what you claim to despise that I find distasteful.
>
> When have I ever said that it's wrong to defend your beliefs?

It should be clear to absolutely everyone else by now that Scott has
NO understanding of the word hypocrisy. None whatsoever.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 7, 3:18*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 7, 1:02*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 7, 1:52*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
>
> > > > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > > > Jenn craved:
>
> > > > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky.
>
> > > > > > That's correct.
>
> > > > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the
> > > > > > > >> > male
> > > > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation
> > > > > > > >> > of
> > > > > > > >> > others.
>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
>
> > > > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
>
> > > > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
>
> > > > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
> > > > > > little drawing that I made.
>
> > > > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
>
> > > > > > Whatever turns you on.
>
> > > > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
>
> > > > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
>
> > > > > > > > I was probably being kind.
>
> > > > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
>
> > > > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of
> > > > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're
> > > > > > > >> too
> > > > > > > >> far
> > > > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
>
> > > > > > > > lol, good one.
>
> > > > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
>
> > > > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your life
> > > > > > last?
>
> > > > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > > > for the field of psychology.
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > > > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
>
> > > *Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> > > I don't think that really helped your cause.
>
> > > > *The innocent
> > > > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
>
> > > *So your going to grill Geo in hypocritical fashion rather than
> > > grant him the rights you demand.
> > > Way to take the high road.
>
> > > >*Perhaps for
> > > > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
>
> > > You, like Phillips, will spam away which really doesn't bother me.
>
> > It's not spam, you idiot.
> >Is this another case where your definition
> > of a word is different than everyone else's on the planet. Flaming,
> > yes. Trolling, yes. Not spamming.
>
> *You offer a lower grade of spam...about 3rd grade.

It's just like you to run away whenever you're cornered.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 7, 3:33*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 7, 1:02*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 7, 1:52*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
>
> > > > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > > > Jenn craved:
>
> > > > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky.
>
> > > > > > That's correct.
>
> > > > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the
> > > > > > > >> > male
> > > > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation
> > > > > > > >> > of
> > > > > > > >> > others.
>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
>
> > > > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
>
> > > > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
>
> > > > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
> > > > > > little drawing that I made.
>
> > > > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
>
> > > > > > Whatever turns you on.
>
> > > > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
>
> > > > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
>
> > > > > > > > I was probably being kind.
>
> > > > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
>
> > > > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of
> > > > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're
> > > > > > > >> too
> > > > > > > >> far
> > > > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
>
> > > > > > > > lol, good one.
>
> > > > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
>
> > > > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your life
> > > > > > last?
>
> > > > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > > > for the field of psychology.
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > > > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
>
> > > *Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> > > I don't think that really helped your cause.
>
> > > > *The innocent
> > > > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
>
> > > *So your going to grill Geo in hypocritical fashion rather than
> > > grant him the rights you demand.
> > > Way to take the high road.
>
> > > >*Perhaps for
> > > > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
>
> > > You, like Phillips, will spam away which really doesn't bother me.
>
> > It's not spam, you idiot. Is this another case where your definition
> > of a word is different than everyone else's on the planet. Flaming,
> > yes. Trolling, yes. Not spamming. If two people are going back and
> > forth, it's not spamming. If someone constantly posts OT topics with
> > little or no repsonse from the others, THAT'S spamming.
>
> > > It's the hypocritical nature of it and your willingness to be
> > > what you claim to despise that I find distasteful.
>
> > -
>
> > I find that we all bow in deference to you when it comes to hypocrisy.
> > You were NEVER here to discuss audio. NEVER. You just wanted to splash
> > around in the pool like everyone else, and you got all testy when you
> > discovered you couldn't swim.
>
> *Actually I got testy when I realized all you want to do is pee in the
> pool.

No. You've never been smart enough to be here. That's why more people
here know you as 2pid than by Scott.

[GeoSynch]

BaBoon howled:

> It should be clear to absolutely everyone else by now that Scott has NO
> understanding of the word hypocrisy. None whatsoever.

Now that's some real irony, coming from the Buffoon who no longer reeks himself
right out of the room with the overwhelming stench of his own hypocrisy. ;-)

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 7, 1:12*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> >
> > > > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > > > Jenn craved:
> >
> > > > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss
> > > > > > > Vicky.
> >
> > > > > > That's correct.
> >
> > > > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size
> > > > > > > >> > of
> > > > > > > >> > the
> > > > > > > >> > male
> > > > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual
> > > > > > > >> > orientation
> > > > > > > >> > of
> > > > > > > >> > others.
> >
> > > > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
> >
> > > > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
> >
> > > > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
> >
> > > > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > little drawing that I made.
> >
> > > > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
> >
> > > > > > Whatever turns you on.
> >
> > > > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
> >
> > > > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
> >
> > > > > > > > I was probably being kind.
> >
> > > > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
> >
> > > > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil
> > > > > > > >> clutches
> > > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as
> > > > > > > >> you're
> > > > > > > >> too
> > > > > > > >> far
> > > > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
> >
> > > > > > > > lol, good one.
> >
> > > > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
> >
> > > > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your
> > > > > > life
> > > > > > last?
> >
> > > > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > > > for the field of psychology.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > > > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
> >
> > > *Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> > > I don't think that really helped your cause.
> >
> > Your right. *I should have just been straight forward and called him a
> > bigot.
>
> It would have save you from indulging in your own form of bigotry.

Your right, I'm bigoted against bigots.

>
> >
> >
> >
> > > > *The innocent
> > > > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
> >
> > > *So your going to grill Geo
> >
> > One question is "grilling". *lol
> >
> > > in hypocritical fashion rather than
> > > grant him the rights you demand.
> > > Way to take the high road.
> >
> > Of what "rights" are you referring?
>
> right to innocence.

Please explain.

>
> > Oops! *I grilled you!
> >
> >
> >
> > > >*Perhaps for
> > > > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
> >
> > > You, like Phillips, will spam away
> >
> > You understand that by responding to my post to Geo, you have spammed in
> > the same way that you accuse me of doing, don't you?
>
> Yeah, except unlike Phillips, I'm not on his OT crusade of hypocrisy.
> He knows his audiophoolery isn't of much interest to anyone so he
> puts his own brand of OT spam (flames and childish ridicule) above
> other topics. He's a hypocritical childish net cop, nothing more.
>
> > *You have no
> > self-awareness whatsoever.
>
> Actually I do but as usual you can't argue from a basis of fact.
> See, unlike Phillips I haven't ridiculed anyone for being OT

Nor have I. So why are you complaining to me about Marc?

> except
> when it's to expose their hypocrisy.
> In this case, your hypocrisy is indulging in your own lame attack on
> sexual
> behavior.

Please show us where I have attacked anyone's sexual behavior.

>
>
> >
> > > which really doesn't bother me.
> > > It's the hypocritical nature of it
> >
> > In what way am I being hypocritical?
>
> Is it really that hard for you to see?

Is it that hard for you to explain?

>
> >
> > > and your willingness to be
> > > what you claim to despise that I find distasteful.
> >
> > When have I ever said that it's wrong to defend your beliefs?
>
> When you decided to trample those beliefs in your defense of them.

That sentence makes no sense.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 11:56*am, ScottW > wrote:

> *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?

No.

But since you agreed that you set the low for RAO I won't call you an
imbecile this time.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 1:52*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
>
> > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > Jenn craved:
>
> > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
>
> > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky..
>
> > > > That's correct.
>
> > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the
> > > > > >> > male
> > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation
> > > > > >> > of
> > > > > >> > others.
>
> > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
>
> > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
>
> > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
>
> > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
> > > > little drawing that I made.
>
> > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
>
> > > > Whatever turns you on.
>
> > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
>
> > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
>
> > > > > > I was probably being kind.
>
> > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
>
> > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of
> > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're
> > > > > >> too
> > > > > >> far
> > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
>
> > > > > > lol, good one.
>
> > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
>
> > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your life
> > > > last?
>
> > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > for the field of psychology.
>
> > > ScottW
>
> > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
>
> *Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> I don't think that really helped your cause.
>
> > *The innocent
> > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
>
> *So your going to grill Geo in hypocritical fashion rather than
> grant him the rights you demand.
> Way to take the high road.
>
> >*Perhaps for
> > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
>
> You, like Phillips, will spam away which really doesn't bother me.
> It's the hypocritical nature of it and your willingness to be
> what you claim to despise that I find distasteful.

Thank you for your on-topic audio opinion.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 3:18*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 7, 1:02*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 7, 1:52*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
>
> > > > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > > > Jenn craved:
>
> > > > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky.
>
> > > > > > That's correct.
>
> > > > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the
> > > > > > > >> > male
> > > > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation
> > > > > > > >> > of
> > > > > > > >> > others.
>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
>
> > > > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
>
> > > > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
>
> > > > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
> > > > > > little drawing that I made.
>
> > > > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
>
> > > > > > Whatever turns you on.
>
> > > > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
>
> > > > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
>
> > > > > > > > I was probably being kind.
>
> > > > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
>
> > > > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of
> > > > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're
> > > > > > > >> too
> > > > > > > >> far
> > > > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
>
> > > > > > > > lol, good one.
>
> > > > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
>
> > > > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your life
> > > > > > last?
>
> > > > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > > > for the field of psychology.
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > > > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
>
> > > *Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> > > I don't think that really helped your cause.
>
> > > > *The innocent
> > > > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
>
> > > *So your going to grill Geo in hypocritical fashion rather than
> > > grant him the rights you demand.
> > > Way to take the high road.
>
> > > >*Perhaps for
> > > > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
>
> > > You, like Phillips, will spam away which really doesn't bother me.
>
> > It's not spam, you idiot.
> >Is this another case where your definition
> > of a word is different than everyone else's on the planet. Flaming,
> > yes. Trolling, yes. Not spamming.
>
> *You offer a lower grade of spam...about 3rd grade.

2pid doesn't know what "spam" is. LOL!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 3:31*pm, ScottW > wrote:

> *When you decided to trample those beliefs in your defense of them.
> You're like Bush on his treatment of illegal combatants.
> Would you like to torture Geo too?

Duh.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 7, 4:32*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 1:12*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > >,
>
> > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > >,
>
> > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > In article >,
>
> > > > > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Jenn craved:
>
> > > > > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss
> > > > > > > > Vicky.
>
> > > > > > > That's correct.
>
> > > > > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size
> > > > > > > > >> > of
> > > > > > > > >> > the
> > > > > > > > >> > male
> > > > > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual
> > > > > > > > >> > orientation
> > > > > > > > >> > of
> > > > > > > > >> > others.
>
> > > > > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
>
> > > > > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
>
> > > > > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
>
> > > > > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > little drawing that I made.
>
> > > > > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
>
> > > > > > > Whatever turns you on.
>
> > > > > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
>
> > > > > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
>
> > > > > > > > > I was probably being kind.
>
> > > > > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
>
> > > > > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil
> > > > > > > > >> clutches
> > > > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as
> > > > > > > > >> you're
> > > > > > > > >> too
> > > > > > > > >> far
> > > > > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
>
> > > > > > > > > lol, good one.
>
> > > > > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
>
> > > > > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your
> > > > > > > life
> > > > > > > last?
>
> > > > > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > > > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > > > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > > > > for the field of psychology.
>
> > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > > > > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
>
> > > > *Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> > > > I don't think that really helped your cause.
>
> > > Your right. *I should have just been straight forward and called him a
> > > bigot.
>
> > *It would have save you from indulging in your own form of bigotry.
>
> Your right, I'm bigoted against bigots.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > > > *The innocent
> > > > > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
>
> > > > *So your going to grill Geo
>
> > > One question is "grilling". *lol
>
> > > > in hypocritical fashion rather than
> > > > grant him the rights you demand.
> > > > Way to take the high road.
>
> > > Of what "rights" are you referring?
>
> > *right to innocence.
>
> Please explain.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > Oops! *I grilled you!
>
> > > > >*Perhaps for
> > > > > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
>
> > > > You, like Phillips, will spam away
>
> > > You understand that by responding to my post to Geo, you have spammed in
> > > the same way that you accuse me of doing, don't you?
>
> > Yeah, except unlike Phillips, I'm not on his OT crusade of hypocrisy.
> > He knows his audiophoolery isn't of much interest to anyone so he
> > puts his own brand of OT spam (flames and childish ridicule) above
> > other topics. *He's a hypocritical childish net cop, nothing more.
>
> > > *You have no
> > > self-awareness whatsoever.
>
> > *Actually I do but as usual you can't argue from a basis of fact.
> > See, unlike Phillips I haven't ridiculed anyone for being OT
>
> Nor have I. *So why are you complaining to me about Marc?
>
> > except
> > when it's to expose their hypocrisy.
> > In this case, your hypocrisy is indulging in your own lame attack on
> > sexual
> > behavior.
>
> Please show us where I have attacked anyone's sexual behavior.
>
>
>
> > > > which really doesn't bother me.
> > > > It's the hypocritical nature of it
>
> > > In what way am I being hypocritical?
>
> > *Is it really that hard for you to see?
>
> Is it that hard for you to explain?
>
>
>
> > > > and your willingness to be
> > > > what you claim to despise that I find distasteful.
>
> > > When have I ever said that it's wrong to defend your beliefs?
>
> > *When you decided to trample those beliefs in your defense of them.
>
> That sentence makes no sense.

All beliefs are the same.

We should be ashamed of ourselves for giving Bratzi **** as (in 2pid's
eyes) since all thoughts are valid and precious so are Bratzi's.

That's how 2pid flows through life. When he gets called
"stupid" (probably a daily occurance) he just 'thinks' to himself
"There goes another asshole who's intolerant of my equally-valid
'differing POV'".

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 7, 3:48*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 7, 1:45*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 7, 3:18*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 7, 1:02*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 7, 1:52*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 7, 10:51*am, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >,
>
> > > > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > > > On Feb 6, 7:33 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article >,
>
> > > > > > > > "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Jenn craved:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Tiny > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > "Tiptoe through your two lips" ... though you ain't no Miss Vicky.
>
> > > > > > > > That's correct.
>
> > > > > > > > > >> > I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the
> > > > > > > > > >> > male
> > > > > > > > > >> > parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation
> > > > > > > > > >> > of
> > > > > > > > > >> > others.
>
> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for letting on what you secretly yearn for, frumpster.
>
> > > > > > > > > > No, it's what YOU yearn for.
>
> > > > > > > > > To pork you with a small penis?
>
> > > > > > > > No, I suspect that you wish that you were as well "represented" as the
> > > > > > > > little drawing that I made.
>
> > > > > > > > > "Mama's little baby likes it short and sweet"
>
> > > > > > > > Whatever turns you on.
>
> > > > > > > > > but having been bitten once is now twice shy.
>
> > > > > > > > You are entitled to your fantasies.
>
> > > > > > > > > > I was probably being kind.
>
> > > > > > > > > I agree you're being kind of kooky.
>
> > > > > > > > > >> Although Anne Heche was successfully saved from the evil clutches of
> > > > > > > > > >> Ellen
> > > > > > > > > >> Degenerate, it's probably way too late for the likes of you as you're
> > > > > > > > > >> too
> > > > > > > > > >> far
> > > > > > > > > >> gone off the deep end of the Lezbo "lifestyle".
>
> > > > > > > > > > lol, good one.
>
> > > > > > > > > We know you gotta laugh to keep from crying.
>
> > > > > > > > Tell us Geo; how long did the longest romantic relationship in your life
> > > > > > > > last?
>
> > > > > > > *Is this OT drivel really worse than current politics?
> > > > > > > GMAFB, *I didn't think RAO could get any worse but Jenn's frolics on
> > > > > > > her usenet black couch has the potential to set new lows, especially
> > > > > > > for the field of psychology.
>
> > > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > > As is the case with just about everyone else, including you, I tend to
> > > > > > defend issues that are of particular importance to me.
>
> > > > > *Attempted personal attack on Geo in defense of gays noted.
> > > > > I don't think that really helped your cause.
>
> > > > > > *The innocent
> > > > > > facts of a person's sexual orientation is such an issue.
>
> > > > > *So your going to grill Geo in hypocritical fashion rather than
> > > > > grant him the rights you demand.
> > > > > Way to take the high road.
>
> > > > > >*Perhaps for
> > > > > > you, it's not. *So don't read it.
>
> > > > > You, like Phillips, will spam away which really doesn't bother me..
>
> > > > It's not spam, you idiot.
> > > >Is this another case where your definition
> > > > of a word is different than everyone else's on the planet. Flaming,
> > > > yes. Trolling, yes. Not spamming.
>
> > > *You offer a lower grade of spam...about 3rd grade.
>
> > It's just like you to run away whenever you're cornered.
>
> *Same old boring and very tired, 3rd grade debating trade spam.

I'm really tired of you being a huge crybaby all the time. Waaaahhh, I
don't like the government. Waaaahhh, I don't like Stereophile.
Waaaahhh, I don't like the way I'm being treated on RAO. Waaahhhh, I
don't like the way I'm being treated on the Chargers group.

I bet you that you just watched the Super Bowl by yourself. The real
world ignores you, doesn't it? Waaahhhhh.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 7, 5:57*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 3:31*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > *When you decided to trample those beliefs in your defense of them.
> > You're like Bush on his treatment of illegal combatants.
> > Would you like to torture Geo too?
>
> Duh.

Waaahhhh.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 7, 12:10*pm, Soupe du jour > wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:31:35 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >"GeoSynch" > wrote in message
>
> >> ScottW wrote:
>
> >>>>> After Arny and Scott were gone, George commented that
> >>>>> he really missed making fun of them. RAO had simply
> >>>>> become boring for him.
>
> >>>>> It's not rocket science.
>
> >>>> You drove them off. George killed himself. Nice work,
> >>>> Boonie.
>
> >>> Hey, what are friends for? *LoL.
>
> >> No doubt Dorgay and the rest of the staff at TONE Audio
> >> heaved a big sigh of relief when Boonie packed it in and
> >> moved down yonder.
>
> >Now that improves my opinion of Dorgay, lots!
>
> Dorgay has not been as malicious as some, but he's still a spewer of
> the typical "high-end" drivel, just like dozens of other reviewers.
>
> They all want to be Gordon Holt, and even he became sad and boring
> after churning out the same old stuff year after year.

It's an occupational hazard. Writing about music is infinitely more
fun.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 22:30, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 11:39 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 17:15, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> On Feb 5, 5:09 am, > wrote:
>>>> Le 05/02/2010 00:28, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>> You are my plaything for today. I pull the
>>>>> string and you spin around and around!
>>
>>>> Marc Phillips in an onanist exhibition.
>>
>>> Again, that doesn't make sense. If I'm pulling your string, I can't be
>>> an onanist.
>>
>> False, you're still playing alone. :-)
>
> No, you are playing with me.

You are right my sweet little guinea pig I'm playing with you.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 22:32, Boon a écrit :

> Ass licker? Really. Are you randomly picking out words from your
> dictionary? Do you know what "ass licker" means in English?

Playing arts should change you from licking ass.
Slow and dense...

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 22:34, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 11:42 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 17:18, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> On Feb 5, 5:17 am, > wrote:
>>>> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>> ...people who call other people fat are usually fat
>>>>> themselves.
>>
>>>> The simple life of Marc Phillips... no comment.
>>
>>> So you are fat! Good!
>>
>>> Now let's talk about how badly you smell. Frenchman are famous for
>>> their stench. A friend of mine recently went to Paris, and she
>>> remarked that every French male stank to high heaven.
>>
>> A lesbian for sure.
>
> I know for sure that she is not. But thank you for confirming your
> stench.
>
>>
>>> Is that why you are lonely and post on RAO? No woman will come near
>>> you?
>>
>> You are spending so much time on RAO that I prefer to return you the
>> question.
>
> I'm sure you would. Your own life is so pathetic that it wouldn't last
> 20 seconds under RAO's magnifying glass.

I see that you have spent the week-end trolling on RAO.
Have you put a video in Mrs Phillips bedroom ?
No ? you should !
You are spending so much time in front of your computer that I'm afraid
someone could enter behind your back... :-D

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 22:41, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 12:02 pm, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 17:23, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> That's not something a straight guy would
>>> say.
>>
>> Are you joking or are you really a simpleton ?

> No, I'm American.

Stupidity hasn't any motherland, don't insult your compatriots.

> If you want to speak for fat, stinky effeminate
> Frenchmen like you, go ahead.

Oh my dear anorexic barrow everybody on RAO knows that you have
discovered your dick few years ago...Just after you finally lost 180
pounds. ;-)
It is written in RAO history.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 22:43, Marc "Anorexic Barrow" Phillips a écrit :

> I'm a loser.

We finally agree.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 06/02/2010 03:29, Jenn a écrit :
> In >,
> > wrote:
>
>> Le 05/02/2010 16:30, Jenn a écrit :
>>> In >,
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> BaBoon preened:
>>>>
>>>>> I, on the other hand, have lovely skin.
>>>>
>>>> You sound like a fruitcake. No wonder you get along so divinely with Boy
>>>> George
>>>> and fag-hag Jilly.
>>>>
>>>> Do you trade your little beauty secrets with them? ;-)
>>>
>>> |-----|
>>
>> I don't know who you are Madam but here you're implicitly make the
>> choice to defend the guy who has written :
>
> I made a graphic representation of my suspicion of the size of the male
> parts of someone who feels the need to comment on sexual orientation of
> others.

Ooops sorry, I didn't understand.
I guess that you would grant a :

|--|

to Marc Phillips after he wrote : "stinky effeminate
Frenchmen like you"
Thank you for your honesty.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 06/02/2010 03:45, Former Big-Boon a écrit :

> must identify with a fat, smelly little Frenchman like
> Lionel.

"People who call other people fat are usually fat
themselves."

Marc Phillips on 02/05/2010

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 05/02/2010 22:40, Boon a écrit :
> On Feb 5, 11:53 am, > wrote:
>> Le 05/02/2010 17:21, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>> On Feb 5, 5:35 am, > wrote:
>>>> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :
>>
>>>>> I feel strong and healthy today,
>>
>>>> So, Mrs Phillips will finally get her annual kick. Have fun ! ;-)
>>
>>> Too bad you are too fat and stinky to attract women, Lionel.
>>
>> I don't attract women, I'm just charming them.
>
> I love how you make fun of yourself all the time. I guess the only way
> to avoid being a total loser is to be self-deprecating, no?
>
>>
>>> Fortunately you have us at RAO to help you pass your lonely days!
>>
>> Maximum one or two weeks a year.
>
> You spend one or two weeks a year totally lonely? That's sad.
>
>> I'm afraid that if you want to evaluate one's sexual problems by a ratio
>> of his presence on RAO you will have a lot of problem to excuse
>> yourself... You should be prudent to where you are putting your feet...
>> You "Ex" fat-boy. ;-)
>
> No, Lionel...you are ignoring the obvious. For instance, look at the
> thread abour horn speakers.

When I want to discuss about horn speaker I go here :
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full-range/
This is a place where one can exchange with real fanatics.
A lovely place where bragards like you don't last long.


> That is the real RAO, where I chat with
> friendly people about audio and music.

And you will continue to prefer Sonny Rollins over any other jazz
saxophonist... Life is cruel.

[Lionel[_8_]]

Le 08/02/2010 04:31, Boon a écrit :

>Writing about music

Music ? LOL !

> is infinitely more
> fun.

This is not because you are padding in advertising internet publication
that you hve the right to grant yourself the title of "Writer".
You're nothing but an internet geek.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 8, 12:15*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 22:32, Boon a écrit :
>
> > Ass licker? Really. Are you randomly picking out words from your
> > dictionary? Do you know what "ass licker" means in English?
>
> Playing arts should change you from licking ass.
> Slow and dense...

Again, that makes no sense in English. It is you who are slow and
dense for failing to recognize that you lack the linguistic abilities
to converse with this group.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 8, 12:30*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 22:41, Boon a crit :
>
> > On Feb 5, 12:02 pm, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 17:23, Boon a crit :
>
> >>> That's not something a straight guy would
> >>> say.
>
> >> Are you joking or are you really a simpleton ?
> > No, I'm American.
>
> Stupidity hasn't any motherland, don't insult your compatriots.
>
> > If you want to speak for fat, stinky effeminate
> > Frenchmen like you, go ahead.
>
> Oh my dear anorexic barrow everybody on RAO knows that you have
> discovered your dick few years ago...Just after you finally lost 180
> pounds. ;-)
> It is written in RAO history.

Sorry, again that makes no sense. In addition, it seems based on some
weird fantasy you have of me. Perhaps you would be more happy with
another smell fat Frenchman instead.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 8, 12:31*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 22:43, Marc "Anorexic Barrow" Phillips a écrit :
>
> > *I'm a loser.
>
> We finally agree.

"Anorexic barrow" makes no sense in English. Slow and dense you are.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 8, 12:43*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 06/02/2010 03:45, Former Big-Boon a écrit :
>
> > must identify with a fat, smelly little Frenchman like
> > Lionel.
>
> "People who call other people fat are usually fat
> themselves."
>
> Marc Phillips on 02/05/2010

That is true. I do not go around calling people fat unless they have
tipped their hand about their obesity. It's like PLF railing against
homesexuals when he is obviously gay himself. It's called projection.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 8, 1:11*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 08/02/2010 04:31, Boon a écrit :
>
> >Writing about music
>
> Music ? LOL !

Since you cannot read or speak English, why in the world do you think
your opinion is valid?

>
> > is infinitely more
> > fun.
>
> This is not because you are padding in advertising internet publication
> that you hve the right to grant yourself the title of "Writer".

That makes no sense in English.

> You're nothing but an internet geek.

An Internet geek posts anonymously. I don't.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 8, 12:52*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 22:40, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 5, 11:53 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 17:21, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> On Feb 5, 5:35 am, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 05/02/2010 00:16, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>> I feel strong and healthy today,
>
> >>>> So, Mrs Phillips will finally get her annual kick. Have fun ! ;-)
>
> >>> Too bad you are too fat and stinky to attract women, Lionel.
>
> >> I don't attract women, I'm just charming them.
>
> > I love how you make fun of yourself all the time. I guess the only way
> > to avoid being a total loser is to be self-deprecating, no?
>
> >>> Fortunately you have us at RAO to help you pass your lonely days!
>
> >> Maximum one or two weeks a year.
>
> > You spend one or two weeks a year totally lonely? That's sad.
>
> >> I'm afraid that if you want to evaluate one's sexual problems by a ratio
> >> of his presence on RAO you will have a lot of problem to excuse
> >> yourself... You should be prudent to where you are putting your feet....
> >> You "Ex" fat-boy. ;-)
>
> > No, Lionel...you are ignoring the obvious. For instance, look at the
> > thread abour horn speakers.
>
> When I want to discuss about horn speaker I *go here :http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full-range/
> This is a place where one can exchange with real fanatics.
> A lovely place where bragards like you don't last long.

And yet I have participated on many audio forums without the results
you so childishly predict. There's nothing like the truth to put a
childish little Internet geek like you in his place, no? LoL!
>
> > That is the real RAO, where I chat with
> > friendly people about audio and music.
>
> And you will continue to prefer Sonny Rollins over any other jazz
> saxophonist... Life is cruel.

Only a little child who knows little about music would criticize
others for their preferences. You are nothing but a fat, smelly
little French teenager who thinks his tastes in musics are better than
everyone else's. That is childish.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Feb 8, 12:12*pm, Lionel > wrote:
> Le 05/02/2010 22:30, Boon a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 5, 11:39 am, > *wrote:
> >> Le 05/02/2010 17:15, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>> On Feb 5, 5:09 am, > * *wrote:
> >>>> Le 05/02/2010 00:28, Boon a écrit :
>
> >>>>> You are my plaything for today. I pull the
> >>>>> string and you spin around and around!
>
> >>>> Marc Phillips in an onanist exhibition.
>
> >>> Again, that doesn't make sense. If I'm pulling your string, I can't be
> >>> an onanist.
>
> >> False, you're still playing alone. :-)
>
> > No, you are playing with me.
>
> You are right my sweet little guinea pig I'm playing with you.

No, you aren't. You're just trying to make yourself better about the
thrashing I gave you last week. Now you can go cry in your fourth
creme brulee of the day, no?

[GeoSynch]

BaBoon emolliated:

> It's like PLF railing against homesexuals when he is obviously gay himself.

Nah, it turns out you're the fag.

Associate with homos long enough and next thing you know you're carrying on
about your "lovely skin."

You're even more queer than Boy George.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 8, 6:37*pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> BaBoon emolliated:
>
> > It's like PLF railing against homesexuals when he is obviously gay himself.
>
> Nah, it turns out you're the fag.
>
> Associate with homos long enough and next thing you know you're carrying on
> about your "lovely skin."
>
> You're even more queer than Boy George.

Thou dost protest too much.

Hopefully you'll find the courage to come out of the closet. It must
be hell on you living a fake life .