Badlands420

[Boon[_2_]]

If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new
world of ridicule for our favorite mutt?

[hophead]

In article <093f8c92-5416-4fcf-9f79-9cafad950b76
@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>, says...
> If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new
> world of ridicule for our favorite mutt?

It would indeed. However, it's pretty clear to me that he was joking
around during his back-and-forth with Shhhh. After all, he was the one
mocking Scottie in that earlier thread I referenced.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 25, 1:20*pm, hophead > wrote:
> In article <093f8c92-5416-4fcf-9f79-9cafad950b76
> @s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>, says...
>
> > If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new
> > world of ridicule for our favorite mutt?
>
> It would indeed. However, it's pretty clear to me that he was joking
> around during his back-and-forth with Shhhh. After all, he was the one
> mocking Scottie in that earlier thread I referenced.

I agree that it's highly unlikely he's Scott's dad. But who would joke
about such a terrible thing?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 25, 1:51*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Nov 25, 1:20*pm, hophead > wrote:
>
> > In article <093f8c92-5416-4fcf-9f79-9cafad950b76
> > @s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>, says...
>
> > > If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new
> > > world of ridicule for our favorite mutt?
>
> > It would indeed. However, it's pretty clear to me that he was joking
> > around during his back-and-forth with Shhhh. After all, he was the one
> > mocking Scottie in that earlier thread I referenced.
>
> I agree that it's highly unlikely he's Scott's dad. But who would joke
> about such a terrible thing?

Somebody high on drugs.

[969]

"Boon" > wrote in message
...
> If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new
> world of ridicule for our favorite mutt?

[badlands420]

I'd just like to say how flattered I am that there's a thread in my honor in
a group I've never previously been to or heard of. I've been usenet stalked
by a great many people over the years, but you guys have taken it to a new
and altogether more impressive level. Please accept my most heartfelt
standing ovation.


"Boon" > wrote in message
...
> If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new
> world of ridicule for our favorite mutt?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 26, 3:43*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> I'd just like to say how flattered I am that there's a thread in my honor in
> a group I've never previously been to or heard of.

You think it's an honor to be ridiculed? Do tell.

I've been usenet stalked
> by a great many people over the years,

Then maybe it's time to get off the computer and join the real world.

but you guys have taken it to a new
> and altogether more impressive level. Please accept my most heartfelt
> standing ovation.

I don't know...is this supposed to make us feel bad or something? Is
your life is so meaningless that any type of acknowledgement is better
than being completely ignored?

That's right...you're still alive, but just barely. Time to go outside
and look at some trees.

[badlands420]

>Is your life is so meaningless that any type of acknowledgement is better
>than being completely ignored?

Being lectured about not having a life by someone who chooses to spend his
time waging newsgroup vendettas with ScottW is quite ironic indeed.

>That's right...you're still alive, but just barely. Time to go outside
>and look at some trees.

I'm curious. You used terms like "revenge" and "getting even" when
explaining your Keystone Kopsian group foray into the Chargers NG (since,
apparently, you regard usenet as SERIOUS ****ING BUSINESS), but, as Scott is
currently not present there and none of us can stand his ass anyway, how do
you suppose retribution is being exacted? This is a serious question. I'd
appreciate a serious answer if you can manage one.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie screeches in outrage.

> >That's right...you're still alive, but just barely. Time to go outside
> >and look at some trees.
>
> I'm curious. You used terms like "revenge" and "getting even" when
> explaining your Keystone Kopsian group foray into the Chargers NG (since,
> apparently, you regard usenet as SERIOUS ****ING BUSINESS)

This is soooo disappointing. You were doing quite well at spotting troll-bait
before. You even made a joke when I suggested you were naive. Now this?
Tsk, tsk.

[badlands420]

> boopsie screeches in outrage.

Don't flatter yourself.

>You were doing quite well at spotting troll-bait before.

The troll bait in question was so obtuse and unoriginal that Helen Keller
couldn't have missed it. Again, don't flatter yourself.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 27, 12:52*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > boopsie screeches in outrage.
>
> Don't flatter yourself.
>
> >You were doing quite well at spotting troll-bait before.
>
> The troll bait in question was so obtuse and unoriginal that Helen Keller
> couldn't have missed it. Again, don't flatter yourself.

Your going to make 2pid feel all sad and ****.

So do you value his input or not? LoL.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 27, 12:14*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >Is your life is so meaningless that any type of acknowledgement is better
> >than being completely ignored?
>
> Being lectured about not having a life by someone who chooses to spend his
> time waging newsgroup vendettas with ScottW is quite ironic indeed.

It's not "ironic" at all. Yet another idiot who has no idea what the
word means.

>
> >That's right...you're still alive, but just barely. Time to go outside
> >and look at some trees.
>
> I'm curious. You used terms like "revenge" and "getting even" when
> explaining your Keystone Kopsian group foray into the Chargers NG (since,
> apparently, you regard usenet as SERIOUS ****ING BUSINESS), but, as Scott is
> currently not present there and none of us can stand his ass anyway, how do
> you suppose retribution is being exacted? This is a serious question. I'd
> appreciate a serious answer if you can manage one.

If that was an accurate rendition of reality, I could probably manage
a serious answer.

[badlands420]

> So do you value his input or not? LoL.

Very much so, because newsgroups wouldn't be any fun at all if everyone was
reasonable and well-informed. LOLZ!!

[badlands420]

>If that was an accurate rendition of reality, I could probably manage
a serious answer.

Wow, I think I just heard the sound of your balls shriveling up into
nothingness. Let me know if they drop again, Mary.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 27, 12:14*am, "badlands420" > wrote:

> I'm curious. You used terms like "revenge" and "getting even" when
> explaining your Keystone Kopsian group foray into the Chargers NG (since,
> apparently, you regard usenet as SERIOUS ****ING BUSINESS), but, as Scott is
> currently not present there and none of us can stand his ass anyway, how do
> you suppose retribution is being exacted? This is a serious question. I'd
> appreciate a serious answer if you can manage one.

1. Usenet is not "serious business". I'm here mainly for the laughs.

2. Perhaps one reason ScottW (or "2pid" as I prefer to call him) is
not here is because he cannot handle being made to look stupid on yet
another newsgroup. Since none of you can seemingly stand his pathetic,
imbecilic ass you should thank us for helping remove him.

3. The fact that he's off cowering somewhere instead of posting his
inane drivel is indeed satisfying. He craves attention and demands
serious consideration of his moronic 'differing POVs'. Personally,
though, I prefer it when he posts because I enjoy tormenting the
idiotic simp. He'll be back on Sunday offering up more of his ill-
informed views. I personally doubt that he's ever played a down. If
nothing else, 2pid values his own opinions quite highly. LoL.

4. In case you hadn't noticed, some of us are even talking football on
the SD group, which is supposedly what that group is about.

Were those responses serious enough for you?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> 4. In case you hadn't noticed, some of us are even talking football on
> the SD group, which is supposedly what that group is about.
>
> Were those responses serious enough for you?

Bratzi needs to find out whether boopsie knows how to solder.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 27, 5:55*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >If that was an accurate rendition of reality, I could probably manage
>
> a serious answer.
>
> Wow, I think I just heard the sound of your balls shriveling up into
> nothingness. Let me know if they drop again, Mary.

You're on some serious drugs, then. For starters, I never talked about
"revenge" and "getting even." That was someone else, genius. Look it
up.

Dude, you're seriously dumb. No wonder you're defending Scott.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 27, 8:26*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > 4. In case you hadn't noticed, some of us are even talking football on
> > the SD group, which is supposedly what that group is about.
>
> > Were those responses serious enough for you?
>
> Bratzi needs to find out whether boopsie knows how to solder.

If you can't machine a pair of goal posts from iron pipe, you can't
play football.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 27, 5:51*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > So do you value his input or not? LoL.
>
> Very much so, because newsgroups wouldn't be any fun at all if everyone was
> reasonable and well-informed. LOLZ!!

Agreed. I find you very entertaining, genius.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > > Were those responses serious enough for you?
> >
> > Bratzi needs to find out whether boopsie knows how to solder.
>
> If you can't machine a pair of goal posts from iron pipe, you can't
> play football.

LOL. Or in the alternative, if you can't make a football using pliers and a
trussing needle, you can't play either.

[badlands420]

> Dude, you're seriously dumb.

And you're comically dumb, so I'd say we're even.

> No wonder you're defending Scott.

He's my son, I don't have a choice.

[badlands420]

> 1. Usenet is not "serious business". I'm here mainly for the laughs.

Sorry, I assumed you guys were familiar with common troll humor. It appears
I was mistaken.

>2. Perhaps one reason ScottW (or "2pid" as I prefer to call him) is
>not here is because he cannot handle being made to look stupid on yet
>another newsgroup. Since none of you can seemingly stand his pathetic,
>imbecilic ass you should thank us for helping remove him.

My newsgroup experience is not adversely affected by the presence of people
I can't stand. Additionally, as I've stated before, I can't imagine ever
taking Scott seriously enough to stalk him. That's more a reflection on you
than him.

>3. The fact that he's off cowering somewhere instead of posting his
>inane drivel is indeed satisfying.

If Scott is important enough to you that you find satisfaction in anything
he does or doesn't do, I wouldn't admit that publicly.

>He craves attention and demands
>serious consideration of his moronic 'differing POVs'.

I don't suppose you've ever heard of a killfile?

>Personally, though, I prefer it when he posts because I enjoy tormenting
>the
>idiotic simp.

So how is it satisfying to troll a group in which he's not present? Please
help me understand this.

>He'll be back on Sunday offering up more of his ill-
>informed views. I personally doubt that he's ever played a down. If
>nothing else, 2pid values his own opinions quite highly. LoL.

If he's able to generate this level of obsession from you all, he has no
reason to think otherwise.

>4. In case you hadn't noticed, some of us are even talking football on
>the SD group, which is supposedly what that group is about.

Well, every thread there tends to be on topic, which is a hell of a lot more
than I can say for this ********.

>Were those responses serious enough for you?

I would prefer a simple answer to the question I asked.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 27, 11:47*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > 1. Usenet is not "serious business". I'm here mainly for the laughs.
>
> Sorry, I assumed you guys were familiar with common troll humor. It appears
> I was mistaken.

Apology accepted.

> >2. Perhaps one reason ScottW (or "2pid" as I prefer to call him) is
> >not here is because he cannot handle being made to look stupid on yet
> >another newsgroup. Since none of you can seemingly stand his pathetic,
> >imbecilic ass you should thank us for helping remove him.
>
> My newsgroup experience is not adversely affected by the presence of people
> I can't stand. Additionally, as I've stated before, I can't imagine ever
> taking Scott seriously enough to stalk him. That's more a reflection on you
> than him.

I haven't been to San Diego since I lived there in the early 1990s.
Tormenting someone on the Usenet hardly qualifies as "stalking".

Talk about taking "this Usenet business" seriously! LMAO!

> >3. The fact that he's off cowering somewhere instead of posting his
> >inane drivel is indeed satisfying.
>
> If Scott is important enough to you that you find satisfaction in anything
> he does or doesn't do, I wouldn't admit that publicly.

LOL!

> >He craves attention and demands
> >serious consideration of his moronic 'differing POVs'.
>
> I don't suppose you've ever heard of a killfile?

Where's the fun in that?

Alternatively, if you don't like what I post, simply killfile me.

> >Personally, though, I prefer it when he posts because I enjoy tormenting
> >the
> >idiotic simp.
>
> So how is it satisfying to troll a group in which he's not present? Please
> help me understand this.

I don't know what newsgroup you're referring to.

> >He'll be back on Sunday offering up more of his ill-
> >informed views. I personally doubt that he's ever played a down. If
> >nothing else, 2pid values his own opinions quite highly. LoL.
>
> If he's able to generate this level of obsession from you all, he has no
> reason to think otherwise.

LOL!

> >Were those responses serious enough for you?
>
> I would prefer a simple answer to the question I asked.

I can't dumb it down any further than I already have.

[badlands420]

> I haven't been to San Diego since I lived there in the early 1990s.

Clearly you've mistaken me for someone who gives a damn about your place of
residence. That being said, thank you for leaving.

>Tormenting someone on the Usenet hardly qualifies as "stalking".

Keep telling yourself that, cupcake.

>Talk about taking "this Usenet business" seriously! LMAO!

Good lord, you're so busy laughing at yourself you can't even get your
terminology right. Embarrassing.

>Alternatively, if you don't like what I post, simply killfile me.

Not at all, I find you every bit as amusing as Scott. Perhaps moreso.

> I don't know what newsgroup you're referring to.

I find this level of cowardice surprising from a group of people who so
enthusiastically launch troll attacks on other newsgroups. At any rate, it
is eminently amusing.

>I can't dumb it down any further than I already have.

Yes, I can see that.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 28, 1:22*am, "badlands420" > wrote:

> >Tormenting someone on the Usenet hardly qualifies as "stalking".
>
> Keep telling yourself that, cupcake.

So this *is* your life.

What a shame, "cupcake".

[badlands420]

> So this *is* your life.

Ralph Edwards, is that you?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 27, 11:36*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Dude, you're seriously dumb.
>
> And you're comically dumb, so I'd say we're even.

So you're not going to admit you were wrong. I didn't know eunuchs
could be avid football fans.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 2:59*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > So this *is* your life.
>
> Ralph Edwards, is that you?

So you're not only dumb, you're old and dumb.

[badlands420]

>So you're not only dumb, you're old and dumb.

Really? How old ya think?

[badlands420]

>So you're not only dumb, you're old and dumb.

Really? How old ya think?

[badlands420]

>So you're not only dumb, you're old and dumb.

Really? How old ya think?

[badlands420]

>So you're not going to admit you were wrong. I didn't know eunuchs
could be avid football fans.

Am I the only one amused by the fact that the only activity in this group is
in a thread with my name on it? ZOMGLOLZ!!

[badlands420]

>So you're not going to admit you were wrong. I didn't know eunuchs
could be avid football fans.

Am I the only one amused by the fact that the only activity in this group is
in a thread with my name on it? ZOMGLOLZ!!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie is such a pozeur.

> >So you're not only dumb, you're old and dumb.
>
> Really? How old ya think?

Old enough to have teenage daughters.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 28, 1:34*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> boopsie is such a pozeur.
>
> > >So you're not only dumb, you're old and dumb.
>
> > Really? How old ya think?
>
> Old enough to have teenage daughters.

It must be the drugs.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > boopsie is such a pozeur.
> >
> > > >So you're not only dumb, you're old and dumb.
> >
> > > Really? How old ya think?
> >
> > Old enough to have teenage daughters.
>
> It must be the drugs.

boopsie is a druggie? How'd you discover that?

[badlands420]

> Old enough to have teenage daughters.

This is news to me.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie plays coy.

> > Old enough to have teenage daughters.
>
> This is news to me.

ZOGLMOOZL!

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 12:44*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >So you're not going to admit you were wrong. I didn't know eunuchs
>
> could be avid football fans.
>
> Am I the only one amused by the fact that the only activity in this group is
> in a thread with my name on it? ZOMGLOLZ!!

It's because you're incredibly easy prey.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 1:34*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> boopsie is such a pozeur.
>
> > >So you're not only dumb, you're old and dumb.
>
> > Really? How old ya think?
>
> Old enough to have teenage daughters.

Old enough to think a Ralph Edwards reference could be funny.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 2:15*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Old enough to have teenage daughters.
>
> This is news to me.

GOOZLMAZL!

We all know, of course, that eunuchs can't have children.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 12:44*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >So you're not going to admit you were wrong. I didn't know eunuchs
>
> could be avid football fans.
>
> Am I the only one amused by the fact that the only activity in this group is
> in a thread with my name on it? ZOMGLOLZ!!

Yes, you are. We're amused at the fact that you think it's a good
thing to spend your life posting on Usenet forums with a bunch of
complete strangers. OMGLOZONFONRZ!

[badlands420]

> It's because you're incredibly easy prey.

Okay, now I'm LOLing IRL.

[badlands420]

> We all know, of course, that eunuchs can't have children.

How do you explain Scott's existence then?

[badlands420]

> Old enough to think a Ralph Edwards reference could be funny.

You're just jealous because I ass****ed Judy Garland.

[badlands420]

>Yes, you are. We're amused at the fact that you think it's a good
>thing to spend your life posting on Usenet forums with a bunch of
complete strangers.

This is one of my favorites. "You are a loser for replying to my posts, but
I can reply to your posts with equal frequency and still be cool."

You really need to read this, before you descend any further into
unintentional self-parody:

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/No_life

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 2:51*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >Yes, you are. We're amused at the fact that you think it's a good
> >thing to spend your life posting on Usenet forums with a bunch of
>
> complete strangers.
>
> This is one of my favorites. "You are a loser for replying to my posts, but
> I can reply to your posts with equal frequency and still be cool."

That's not logical. You were the one who complained, not I. So your
point makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 2:39*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Old enough to think a Ralph Edwards reference could be funny.
>
> You're just jealous because I ass****ed Judy Garland.

I think you're setting the bar very low here. Then again, you're just
some dumb asshole who discusses football on the Internet while he
watches it on television. I'm not sure why I expected you to actually
be witty.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 28, 4:01*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2:39*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > Old enough to think a Ralph Edwards reference could be funny.
>
> > You're just jealous because I ass****ed Judy Garland.
>
> I think you're setting the bar very low here. Then again, you're just
> some dumb asshole who discusses football on the Internet while he
> watches it on television. I'm not sure why I expected you to actually
> be witty.

Is Badlands the guy from the "This is your brain on drugs" commercial?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 28, 2:10*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > boopsie is such a pozeur.
>
> > > > >So you're not only dumb, you're old and dumb.
>
> > > > Really? How old ya think?
>
> > > Old enough to have teenage daughters.
>
> > It must be the drugs.
>
> boopsie is a druggie? How'd you discover that?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/20/what-420-means-the-true-s_n_188320..html

Enjoy.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 4:06*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Nov 28, 4:01*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Nov 28, 2:39*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > > Old enough to think a Ralph Edwards reference could be funny.
>
> > > You're just jealous because I ass****ed Judy Garland.
>
> > I think you're setting the bar very low here. Then again, you're just
> > some dumb asshole who discusses football on the Internet while he
> > watches it on television. I'm not sure why I expected you to actually
> > be witty.
>
> Is Badlands the guy from the "This is your brain on drugs" commercial?

No, he's the guy from the Carl's Jr. commercials. You know, "if it
wasn't for us, some guys would starve.'

[badlands420]

> I think you're setting the bar very low here.

I also ass****ed Mae West. No lube.

>Then again, you're just some dumb asshole who discusses football on the
>Internet while he
watches it on television.

You accuse other people of setting a low bar, and this is the best material
you can come up with? Dumb asshole? God, what an absolutely devastating
assault.

> I'm not sure why I expected you to actually be witty.

If I was regarded as witty by someone like you, I'd ****ing kill myself.

[badlands420]

>That's not logical. You were the one who complained, not I. So your
point makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

As much as I wouldn't have thought it possible, your material continues to
get weaker and weaker. You flame like old people ****, Gomer.

[badlands420]

> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/20/what-420-means-the-true-s_n_188320.html

No, 420 is actually the number of times I cornholed Greta Garbo. Common
mistake, I'll let you slide.

[badlands420]

> No, he's the guy from the Carl's Jr. commercials. You know, "if it
wasn't for us, some guys would starve.'

Starvation is a fate much less miserable than watching you try to come up
with a decent insult.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie said:

> > No, he's the guy from the Carl's Jr. commercials. You know, "if it
> > wasn't for us, some guys would starve.'
>
> Starvation is a fate much less miserable than watching you try to come up
> with a decent insult.

It's a good thing you don't take Usenet seriously, else you might find
yourself wrapped around the axle of your antisocial personality disorder.
Details here:

<http://amasci.com/weird/flam2.html#f2>

[badlands420]

> It's a good thing you don't take Usenet seriously, else you might find
> yourself wrapped around the axle of your antisocial personality disorder.
> Details here:

Sweet christ, you people could all drink gasoline and **** on a brush fire
and it wouldn't make any flames.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 28, 4:48*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/20/what-420-means-the-true-s_n_...
>
> No, 420 is actually the number of times I cornholed Greta Garbo. Common
> mistake, I'll let you slide.

You need to hook up with Bratzi.

Have you ever "cornholed" Marilyn Monroe? If yes, was she alive at the
time?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 28, 5:07*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > It's a good thing you don't take Usenet seriously, else you might find
> > yourself wrapped around the axle of your antisocial personality disorder.

[badlands420]

> Have you ever "cornholed" Marilyn Monroe?

Nah, she was a little young for me. However, I did once donkey punch Rita
Hayworth while she anal fisted Betty Grable. Those bitches were freaky.

[badlands420]

> Anal sex fantasies constitute "flames"?

Yes, anal intercourse can sometimes result in inflammation. That's why it's
crucial to spit on the balloon knot before you untie it.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 28, 4:44 pm, "badlands420" > wrote:

> If I was regarded as witty by someone like you, I'd ****ing kill myself.

You sound just like 2pid.

There is no greater "flame" than that. ROLZLMZAOZ!

[badlands420]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in message
...
> On Nov 28, 4:44 pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
>> If I was regarded as witty by someone like you, I'd ****ing kill myself.
>
> You sound just like 2pid.
>
> There is no greater "flame" than that. ROLZLMZAOZ!

Yeah, you really got me that time. I think the three of you should have one
of your little self-congratulatory circle jerks in celebration.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie is still whining.

> > It's a good thing you don't take Usenet seriously, else you might find
> > yourself wrapped around the axle of your antisocial personality disorder.
> > Details here:
>
> Sweet christ, you people could all drink gasoline and **** on a brush fire
> and it wouldn't make any flames.

It's OK if you don't feel insulted. We Smart Guys know what the score is.

[badlands420]

> We Smart Guys know what the score is.

Unintentional Irony Noted. At This Point I May Have To Start Flaming Myself
Just To Even Things Up A Bit.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie steps in it.

> > We Smart Guys know what the score is.
>
> Unintentional Irony

<snicker>

This is RAO, boopsie. It's not a football group full of chronic drunks.

[badlands420]

> This is RAO, boopsie.

Yes, your dead newsgroup with three regulars and no on-topic discussion is
quite impressive. You are *totally* in a position to condescend to others.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie strains to stay in the game.

> > This is RAO, boopsie.
>
> You are *totally* in a position to condescend to others.

Scottie Witlessmongrel has a literacy problem as well as a logicality
problem. So far, you've demonstrated the latter while tacitly admitting to a
substance abuse problem. Are you absolutely certain you and Witless should be
in the same self-help group? I, for one, have my doubts about the likelihood
either of you will get better as a result of your interaction.

[badlands420]

> So far, you've demonstrated the latter while tacitly admitting to a
> substance abuse problem.

I would absolutely love to hear the basis for this allegation. I'm all ears.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie tries his tired "poor little ol' me" routine again.

> > So far, you've demonstrated the latter while tacitly admitting to a
> > substance abuse problem.
>
> I would absolutely love to hear the basis for this allegation. I'm all ears.

As I've mentioned, this is RAO. We're not a bunch of brain-dead drunks like
you find on your football group.

[badlands420]

> As I've mentioned, this is RAO. We're not a bunch of brain-dead drunks
> like
> you find on your football group.

Non sequitur, quite a feeble one at that. Don't make allegations you're not
prepared to substantiate, unless you enjoy looking like a little sniveling
coward.

Also, please feel free to head over to the Chargers group and announce how
intellectually superior you are to everyone there. If you've got the balls
enough, that is.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie's RCD takes hold.

> > As I've mentioned, this is RAO. We're not a bunch of brain-dead drunks
> > like you find on your football group.
>
> Non sequitur,

No, it's not. Nor is it a nonsequitur. The problem here is on your end.
You're not capable of understanding because of your ignorance, your
stubbornness, or both.

This behavior is why the RAO Smart Guys wonder if you're related to
duh-Scottie.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 4:49*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > No, he's the guy from the Carl's Jr. commercials. You know, "if it
>
> wasn't for us, some guys would starve.'
>
> Starvation is a fate much less miserable than watching you try to come up
> with a decent insult.

You're missing the point again. This isn't for your benefit, it's for
ours. And we're really making each other laugh right now at your
expense.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 5:07*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > It's a good thing you don't take Usenet seriously, else you might find
> > yourself wrapped around the axle of your antisocial personality disorder.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 6:38*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > We Smart Guys know what the score is.
>
> Unintentional Irony Noted.

That's still not irony, genius.

At This Point I May Have To Start Flaming Myself
> Just To Even Things Up A Bit.

I'm sure you masturbate quite frequently. You spent most of last
night--Saturday night--responding to us. I can't imagine your dance
card is that full.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 6:53*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > This is RAO, boopsie.
>
> Yes, your dead newsgroup with three regulars and no on-topic discussion is
> quite impressive. You are *totally* in a position to condescend to others..

There are more than three regulars, and there are several on-topic
threads right now. This is the closest you've come to irony so far,
genius.

[badlands420]

> No, it's not. Nor is it a nonsequitur.

Unbelievable. Too bad you lack the self-awareness to be as embarrassed as
you should be.

> The problem here is on your end.

Please elaborate. You're giving me nothing but empty bluster and hollow
posturing.

> You're not capable of understanding because of your ignorance, your
> stubbornness, or both.

Again, please elaborate. Ignorance of what? Are you capable of anything but
meaningless chest-puffing?

> This behavior is why the RAO Smart Guys wonder if you're related to
> duh-Scottie.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject? Why do you squirm and evade
rather than back up your big talk? Are you that terrified of me, a
brain-dead football fan? Do people actually take you seriously here, or are
you merely tolerated?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 28, 10:25*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > So far, you've demonstrated the latter while tacitly admitting to a
> > substance abuse problem.
>
> I would absolutely love to hear the basis for this allegation. I'm all ears.

If you are using 420 in your moniker, you're a pothead. If you are
using 420 in your moniker and don't understand the implications,
you're a moron. Which is it?

[badlands420]

> And we're really making each other laugh right now at your
expense.

Well, I'm glad you all find each other's ineptitude amusing. It's important
to surround one's self with like-minded jackasses.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 2:46*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > As I've mentioned, this is RAO. We're not a bunch of brain-dead drunks
> > like
> > you find on your football group.
>
> Non sequitur, quite a feeble one at that.

After you look up irony in the dictionary, I have another assignment
for you.

[badlands420]

> If you are using 420 in your moniker, you're a pothead.

Really? Please define what you think a "pothead" is.

[badlands420]

>There are more than three regulars, and there are several on-topic
>threads right now. This is the closest you've come to irony so far,
genius.

You're starting to post at an extremely furious rate. Are you sure a lowly
pothead warrants this level of attention?

[badlands420]

>I'm sure you masturbate quite frequently. You spent most of last
>night--Saturday night--responding to us.

And you're spending your Sunday thinking about me stroking my cock. Kinda
creepy, but whatever floats your boat I guess.

[badlands420]

> Is that an effective Usenet strategy for you? Sticks and stones?

Yes, I've found them to be quite effective against your armada of straw men
and sock puppets.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie is fwus****ed again.

> > No, it's not. Nor is it a nonsequitur.
>
> Unbelievable. Too bad you lack the self-awareness to be as embarrassed as
> you should be.

Either that or you're dead wrong. Of course your stubbornness and immaturity
prevent you from ever admitting to error, so the problem must be attributable
to everybody except you. It's the same with the Krooborg, but of course Mr.
**** is insane. Does the Kroo know he's animating you this week?

> > The problem here is on your end.
>
> Please elaborate. You're giving me nothing but empty bluster and hollow
> posturing.

Point to me, then.

> > You're not capable of understanding because of your ignorance, your
> > stubbornness, or both.
>
> Again, please elaborate. Ignorance of what? Are you capable of anything but
> meaningless chest-puffing?

If you knew the RAO culture, for lack of a better word, you wouldn't have to
whine about being left behind. Have you even noticed that this exchange isn't
being crossposted to your football group? On RAO-only threads, I don't have
to explain anything I say about 'borgs and feebs. That's because the other
Normals know what I mean.

> > This behavior is why the RAO Smart Guys wonder if you're related to
> > duh-Scottie.

> Why do you keep trying to change the subject?

<snicker>

That has been the subject all along, boopsie. In a nutshell, we're trying to
find out exactly how pompous and thickheaded you can be. In the end, when one
of us causes you to explode, you'll either gather some stones and dig into
the history of RAO, or you'll slink off home in defeat, Scottie-like.

[badlands420]

> In the end, when one
> of us causes you to explode,

While I'm certainly flattered by the offer, I can assure you I don't swing
that way.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie is in the zone, man.

> > If you are using 420 in your moniker, you're a pothead.
>
> Really? Please define what you think a "pothead" is.

If you have to mince your words and count your tokes, does it really matter?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 1:05*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > And we're really making each other laugh right now at your
>
> expense.
>
> Well, I'm glad you all find each other's ineptitude amusing. It's important
> to surround one's self with like-minded jackasses.

Like-minded...one of Scott's favorite words! LZMAZOLAZ!

We're not inept, genius. You just don't like being outnumbered. The
quality of your put-downs are particularly inept, though. Here's the
tell: we're laughing at your attempts to insult us, and you're all a-
bluster trying to come up with something good in return.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 1:20*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > If you are using 420 in your moniker, you're a pothead.
>
> Really? Please define what you think a "pothead" is.

Obfuscating again? Just be a man and admit you smoke pot. You're only
running away from yourself.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 1:22*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >There are more than three regulars, and there are several on-topic
> >threads right now. This is the closest you've come to irony so far,
>
> genius.
>
> You're starting to post at an extremely furious rate. Are you sure a lowly
> pothead warrants this level of attention?

Extremely furious? My, the hyperbole astounds.

I think you thrive on this sort of attention. Like most Internet
addicts, it's the only thing reminding you you're still alive.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 1:23*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >I'm sure you masturbate quite frequently. You spent most of last
> >night--Saturday night--responding to us.
>
> And you're spending your Sunday thinking about me stroking my cock. Kinda
> creepy, but whatever floats your boat I guess.

Actually, it sounds like you get off thinking about strangers thinking
about your cock. That's even more creepy.

[badlands420]

> If you have to mince your words and count your tokes, does it really
> matter?

More bluster, more posturing, more evasion. It's appropriate that I find
myself in a group of vinyl aficionados, because you all sound like broken
records.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 1:26*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Is that an effective Usenet strategy for you? Sticks and stones?
>
> Yes, I've found them to be quite effective against your armada of straw men
> and sock puppets.

So Badlands420 is your real name, hypocrite?

[badlands420]

> Obfuscating again? Just be a man and admit you smoke pot.

Admit? I never said I didn't smoke pot. I asked you what you think a
"pothead" is. Just be a man and tell me.

[badlands420]

>I think you thrive on this sort of attention.

If that's the case, why do you continue to offer it?

[badlands420]

>Actually, it sounds like you get off thinking about strangers thinking
>about your cock.

Mrs. Badlands, just a moment ago: "Dude, this guy spends more time thinking
about your cock than I do!"

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Nov 29, 1:20*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > > If you are using 420 in your moniker, you're a pothead.
> >
> > Really? Please define what you think a "pothead" is.
>
> Obfuscating again? Just be a man and admit you smoke pot. You're only
> running away from yourself.

I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
once in my life. At first he didn't believe me. Then he believed me
but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
not smoking pot more. lol

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie makes a yoke.

> > If you have to mince your words and count your tokes, does it really
> > matter?

> More bluster, more posturing, more evasion.

Was it? I'm not following your "logic".

> It's appropriate that I find myself in a group of vinyl aficionados,
> because you all sound like broken records.

We're not all into vinyl, but you get an H for hahaha.

[badlands420]

> So Badlands420 is your real name, hypocrite?

Huh?

I think you may need to back away from the computer for a while. Your
incoherence is starting to border on psychosis.

[badlands420]

>We're not inept, genius. You just don't like being outnumbered.

Really? How do you figure?

[badlands420]

> I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> once in my life. At first he didn't believe me. Then he believed me
> but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
> not smoking pot more. lol

That's pretty funny. I've had similar exchanges with him as well.

[badlands420]

"badlands420" > wrote in message
...
>
>>I think you thrive on this sort of attention.
>
> If that's the case, why do you continue to offer it?

PS- It's ironic (and quite funny) that you'd accuse me of craving attention
when the only reason I'm here is because you chose to start a thread with my
name on it.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 2:18*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Obfuscating again? Just be a man and admit you smoke pot.
>
> Admit? I never said I didn't smoke pot. I asked you what you think a
> "pothead" is. Just be a man and tell me.

Another obfuscation, I see.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 2:28*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >Actually, it sounds like you get off thinking about strangers thinking
> >about your cock.
>
> Mrs. Badlands, just a moment ago: "Dude, this guy spends more time thinking
> about your cock than I do!"
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So in other words, she never thinks about your cock at all. I don't
think that's something you should have shared with the group.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 2:12*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > If you have to mince your words and count your tokes, does it really
> > matter?
>
> More bluster, more posturing, more evasion. It's appropriate that I find
> myself in a group of vinyl aficionados, because you all sound like broken
> records.

This isn't a group of vinyl aficionados, genius. And now, it's not
ironic that you think so.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 2:29*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *Boon > wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 1:20*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > > > If you are using 420 in your moniker, you're a pothead.
>
> > > Really? Please define what you think a "pothead" is.
>
> > Obfuscating again? Just be a man and admit you smoke pot. You're only
> > running away from yourself.
>
> I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> once in my life. *At first he didn't believe me. *Then he believed me
> but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
> not smoking pot more. *lol

At the same time, I once had an argument with him about pot. He had a
zero-tolerance approach to its legalization, even though he could
provide no evidence of its harmful effects.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 2:30*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > So Badlands420 is your real name, hypocrite?
>
> Huh?
>
> I think you may need to back away from the computer for a while. Your
> incoherence is starting to border on psychosis.

That's not an appropriate response. It's hyperbole. No one here is
buying your bull****.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 2:45*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> "badlands420" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
> >>I think you thrive on this sort of attention.
>
> > If that's the case, why do you continue to offer it?
>
> PS- It's ironic (and quite funny) that you'd accuse me of craving attention
> when the only reason I'm here is because you chose to start a thread with my
> name on it.

That's not irony either, genius.

[MiNe 109]

In article

>,
Jenn > wrote:

> I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> once in my life. At first he didn't believe me. Then he believed me
> but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
> not smoking pot more. lol

That might help explain his stoner-circa-1974 taste in music.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 5:02*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
>
>
> >,
> *Jenn > wrote:
> > I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> > once in my life. *At first he didn't believe me. *Then he believed me
> > but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
> > not smoking pot more. *lol
>
> That might help explain his stoner-circa-1974 taste in music.

LZMAOZROZL!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> > once in my life. *At first he didn't believe me. *Then he believed me
> > but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
> > not smoking pot more. *lol
>
> At the same time, I once had an argument with him about pot. He had a
> zero-tolerance approach to its legalization, even though he could
> provide no evidence of its harmful effects.

That's odd. Legalization would turn weed into a profit center for government
instead of the money pit that interdiction is now. Doesn't Scottie realize
that every dollar of tax paid by others is one he doesn't have to worry
about?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > > > your armada[sic] of straw men and sock puppets.

boopsie believes we're engaged in a naval battle.

> > > So Badlands420 is your real name, hypocrite?

> > I think you may need to back away from the computer for a while. Your
> > incoherence is starting to border on psychosis.

> That's not an appropriate response. It's hyperbole. No one here is
> buying your bull****.

boopsie has no idea what most of our posts mean. Just like Scottie.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

> > I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> > once in my life. At first he didn't believe me. Then he believed me
> > but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
> > not smoking pot more. lol
>
> That might help explain his stoner-circa-1974 taste in music.

It might? Is irony involved?

Either way, wouldn't a genre like "stoner music" vary geographically? I was
in the northeast in the '70s and the stoners I met had diverse taste. Some
like top 40 (ACDC, Bad Company, Kansas), some like mellow rock (the Dead,
Allman Bros., Ten Years After), and some were still into what peaked in the
'60s (Beatles and Indian). The clubbers liked BritPop. Where do you
pigeonhole Witlessmongrel?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Witless barks impotently.

> > You're missing the point again. This isn't for your benefit, it's for
> > ours.
>
> Which only serves to demonstrate what a lowly scumbag you are if this
> crap benefits you.

Did you hear about the fascist surge in Switzerland, Scooter? They're getting
ready to exterminate all the muslims. You should figure out how to adapt
their tactics to rid America of illegals from Mexico.

[badlands420]

> Another obfuscation, I see.

My heavens, you smoke much better weed than I do.

[badlands420]

> Some like top 40 (ACDC, Bad Company, Kansas),

If you can name me a top 40 AC/DC song, I'll give you a thousand dollars.

[badlands420]

> That's not irony either, genius.

Yeah, whatever. You're a joke.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Nov 29, 12:29*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> > *Boon > wrote:
> > > On Nov 29, 1:20*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > > > > If you are using 420 in your moniker, you're a pothead.
> >
> > > > Really? Please define what you think a "pothead" is.
> >
> > > Obfuscating again? Just be a man and admit you smoke pot. You're only
> > > running away from yourself.
> >
> > I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> > once in my life.
>
> Which is pretty silly.

As usual, you're not being clear. What is "pretty silly"? My
remembering? Your reaction? That I've only smoked pot once?

> In your day, you didn't even get a buzz the
> first time.

I see. So I should have kept at it until I got a buzz?

> Still, you do suffer at times from reefer madness.

I do? As evidenced by what, exactly?

You then go off on some free association rants, hoping for a successful
troll:

>
> I wonder if your internet stalker experience was a hallucination. I
> suppose not since you seem to have no problem associating with usenet
> stalkers.
> You're probably just as quilty in that episode as Mary Jo.
>
> ScottW

[badlands420]

>So in other words, she never thinks about your cock at all. I don't
think that's something you should have shared with the group.

This is the third time you've mentioned my genitals. I think that makes you
officially my girlfriend.

[badlands420]

>That's not an appropriate response. It's hyperbole. No one here is
buying your bull****.

Yeah, I'm very distraught. Thanks for being my personal marionette,
****hole.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 5:06*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Boon said:
>
> > > I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> > > once in my life. *At first he didn't believe me. *Then he believed me
> > > but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
> > > not smoking pot more. *lol
>
> > At the same time, I once had an argument with him about pot. He had a
> > zero-tolerance approach to its legalization, even though he could
> > provide no evidence of its harmful effects.
>
> That's odd. Legalization would turn weed into a profit center for government
> instead of the money pit that interdiction is now. Doesn't Scottie realize
> that every dollar of tax paid by others is one he doesn't have to worry
> about?

He said it used to irritate his lungs, and that was enough to make it
BAD in his eyes. Remember, Scott always thinks about how the issues
affect HIS life.

[badlands420]

> Ask him about his "victimization" by adultery.

Somebody actually married that tool?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 5:10*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 29, 8:57*am, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Nov 28, 4:49*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > > No, he's the guy from the Carl's Jr. commercials. You know, "if it
>
> > > wasn't for us, some guys would starve.'
>
> > > Starvation is a fate much less miserable than watching you try to come up
> > > with a decent insult.
>
> > You're missing the point again. This isn't for your benefit, it's for
> > ours.
>
> *Which only serves to demonstrate what a lowly scumbag you are if this
> crap benefits you.

Are you saying that being amused or entertained makes you a scumbag?
Do tell.

> *BTW, the Chargers are kicking KC ass..again.

Sounds like a real Turd Bowl.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 5:25*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Another obfuscation, I see.
>
> My heavens, you smoke much better weed than I do.

No I don't.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 5:26*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Some like top 40 (ACDC, Bad Company, Kansas),
>
> If you can name me a top 40 AC/DC song, I'll give you a thousand dollars.

"Stiff Upper Lip" (#1, Billboard Mainstream Rock charts), "Satellite
Blues" (#7), "Safe in New York City" (#31).

"Back in Black" (#37, Billboard Top 100), "You Shook Me All Night
Long" (#35).

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 5:27*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > That's not irony either, genius.
>
> Yeah, whatever. You're a joke.

Yeah, like whutever, dude. Pass the bong.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 5:29*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >So in other words, she never thinks about your cock at all. I don't
>
> think that's something you should have shared with the group.
>
> This is the third time you've mentioned my genitals. I think that makes you
> officially my girlfriend.

No, it doesn't. It makes you officially a guy looking for girlfriends.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. Your Charger buddies might
disown you, though.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 5:30*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >That's not an appropriate response. It's hyperbole. No one here is
>
> buying your bull****.
>
> Yeah, I'm very distraught. Thanks for being my personal marionette,
> ****hole.

I'm not. More hyperbole. Do you not know what that word means either?

[badlands420]

"Boon" > wrote in message
...
On Nov 29, 5:25 pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Another obfuscation, I see.
>
> My heavens, you smoke much better weed than I do.

>No I don't.

Nice try, Cheech. Go wrap another doobie.

[badlands420]

>Yeah, like whutever, dude. Pass the bong.

That's hilarious! Pass the bong! How brilliant and original!

[badlands420]

> I'm not. More hyperbole. Do you not know what that word means either?

Of course I do. I hyperbole is what I stack when a regular bowl isn't
enough.

Pass the bong, dood!

[badlands420]

>No, it doesn't. It makes you officially a guy looking for girlfriends.
>Not that there's anything wrong with that. Your Charger buddies might
disown you, though.

*yawn*

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Nov 29, 3:28*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Nov 29, 12:29*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *Boon > wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 29, 1:20*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > > > > > > If you are using 420 in your moniker, you're a pothead.
> >
> > > > > > Really? Please define what you think a "pothead" is.
> >
> > > > > Obfuscating again? Just be a man and admit you smoke pot. You're only
> > > > > running away from yourself.
> >
> > > > I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> > > > once in my life.
> >
> > > * Which is pretty silly.
> >
> > As usual, you're not being clear.
>
> Nothing is ever clear to you the first time.

True, when it comes to your writing.

>
> > *What is "pretty silly"? *My
> > remembering? *Your reaction? *That I've only smoked pot once?

Unanswered.

> >
> > > *In your day, you didn't even get a buzz the
> > > first time.
> >
> > I see. *
>
> Above you said you didn't see. Which is it?
> Do you see or are you still confused?

You don't understand normal writing. The "I see" refers to your "In
your day..."

>
>
> >So I should have kept at it until I got a buzz?
>
> That's what most people try pot for.
> You and Bill Clinton are the only people who ever
> smoked pot not to get a buzz.

I did it to be sociable at a party at which a band I was in was playing.

>
>
> >
> > > * Still, you do suffer at times from reefer madness.
> >
> > I do? *As evidenced by what, exactly?
>
> See above.

What, specifically?

>
> >
> > You then go off on some free association rants, hoping for a successful
> > troll:
>
> Actually it's on point, but your fear of self-awareness forces you
> into denial.

lol I'm quite self-aware, thank you. For example, I'd forgotten what a
waste of time you are.

>
>
> >
> > > * I wonder if your internet stalker experience was a hallucination. I
> > > suppose not since you seem to have no problem associating with usenet
> > > stalkers.
> > > *You're probably just as quilty in that episode as Mary Jo.
> >
> > > ScottW- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -

[vinyl anachronist]

On Nov 29, 5:48*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
> ...
> On Nov 29, 5:25 pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > Another obfuscation, I see.
>
> > My heavens, you smoke much better weed than I do.
> >No I don't.
>
> Nice try, Cheech. Go wrap another doobie.

Nice IKYABWAI, genius.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Nov 29, 5:51*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >Yeah, like whutever, dude. Pass the bong.
>
> That's hilarious! Pass the bong! How brilliant and original!

It's not meant to be original. It's meant to be a parody of your
overall intelligence. Even so, it still went over your head. Amazing.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Nov 29, 5:53*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >No, it doesn't. It makes you officially a guy looking for girlfriends.
> >Not that there's anything wrong with that. Your Charger buddies might
>
> disown you, though.
>
> *yawn*

Pot makes you sleepy?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Nov 29, 6:02*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 29, 3:15*pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
> > MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > > I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> > > > once in my life. *At first he didn't believe me. *Then he believed me
> > > > but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
> > > > not smoking pot more. *lol
>
> > > That might help explain his stoner-circa-1974 taste in music.
>
> > It might? Is irony involved?
>
> > Either way, wouldn't a genre like "stoner music" vary geographically?
>
> * Are you disagreeing with Stephen? It was a rather silly comment.
>
> > I was
> > in the northeast in the '70s and the stoners I met had diverse taste.
>
> * So much for a geopraphic influence.
>
> >Some
> > like top 40 (ACDC, Bad Company, Kansas), some like mellow rock (the Dead,
> > Allman Bros., Ten Years After), and some were still into what peaked in the
> > '60s (Beatles and Indian). The clubbers liked BritPop. Where do you
> > pigeonhole Witlessmongrel?
>
> * 70's was King Crimson, Genesis, Jeff Beck, Spirit, Camel, Caravan,
> Queen to name but a few.
> I never liked the kiddie-pop stuff like the Shins which Marc is so
> enamored with.

Jesus Christ. You know nothing about the kind of music I like. I even
told you not to buy the Shins album because it wasn't your speed.

And you may be the first person in the world to call the Shins "kiddie
pop." That's because your musical tastes are so stunted.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Nov 29, 6:23*pm, Big Al > wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:38:02 -0800, "badlands420"
>
> > wrote:
>
> >> *Ask him about his "victimization" by adultery.
>
> >Somebody actually married that tool?
>
> And Scott actually socializes with this collection of doucebags?

What's a doucebag?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Nov 29, 6:26*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 29, 4:20*pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Boon said:
>
> > > > > At the same time, I once had an argument with him about pot. He had a
> > > > > zero-tolerance approach to its legalization, even though he could
> > > > > provide no evidence of its harmful effects.
>
> > > > That's odd. Legalization would turn weed into a profit center for government
> > > > instead of the money pit that interdiction is now. Doesn't Scottie realize
> > > > that every dollar of tax paid by others is one he doesn't have to worry
> > > > about?
>
> > > He said it used to irritate his lungs, and that was enough to make it
> > > BAD in his eyes. Remember, Scott always thinks about how the issues
> > > affect HIS life.
>
> > Then Witless should want tobacco to be banned also. What's his plan for
> > replacing the lost tax revenue from tobacco products?
>
> *Marc's just making **** up...again.

You mean like how you've lied about my family?

We had that conversation in your kitchen. I would have destroyed your
feeble argument, but I was a guest in your house.

You'd think if he was going to
> bother to lie
> he'd say something witty or worth lying about.
> Apparently anything is worth lying about to him.
> Hey, he aspires to by like you George. Aren't you the proud papa.

You know Scott, you've lied about my wife, my kids and me. And now
you're pretending to be so indignant here. You're such a scumbag.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Nov 29, 6:56*pm, "ScottW" > wrote:
> On Nov 29, 4:43 pm, vinyl anachronist > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 29, 6:26 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 29, 4:20 pm, George M. Middius >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Boon said:
>
> > > > > > > At the same time, I once had an argument with him about pot. He
> > > > > > > had a
> > > > > > > zero-tolerance approach to its legalization, even though he
> > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > provide no evidence of its harmful effects.
>
> > > > > > That's odd. Legalization would turn weed into a profit center for
> > > > > > government
> > > > > > instead of the money pit that interdiction is now. Doesn't Scottie
> > > > > > realize
> > > > > > that every dollar of tax paid by others is one he doesn't have to
> > > > > > worry
> > > > > > about?
>
> > > > > He said it used to irritate his lungs, and that was enough to make
> > > > > it
> > > > > BAD in his eyes. Remember, Scott always thinks about how the issues
> > > > > affect HIS life.
>
> > > > Then Witless should want tobacco to be banned also. What's his plan
> > > > for
> > > > replacing the lost tax revenue from tobacco products?
>
> > > *Marc's just making **** up...again.
>
> > You mean like how you've lied about my family?
>
> > We had that conversation in your kitchen.
>
> *Only in your fantasies.
>
> > I would have destroyed your
> > feeble argument, but I was a guest in your house.
>
> Just like you destroy arguments on usenet.
> With pure fiction.

So now you're admitting you are a big pothead just like your dad,
"Badlands420"?

We had this discussion in front of Art (who was on my side) and your
wife (who was busy rolling her eyes at you). It just seems kind of
dumb for you to deny this now. I can only assume you're just being
contrary.

I remember being surprised at the time. With your big blond wavy
mullet, I had assumed you were a big pot smoker.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > I remember Scott's reaction when I told him that I had only smoked pot
> > > once in my life. At first he didn't believe me. Then he believed me
> > > but thought I was, IIRC, "stuck up" or an "elitist" or something due to
> > > not smoking pot more. lol
> >
> > That might help explain his stoner-circa-1974 taste in music.
>
> It might? Is irony involved?

Irony's diffident cousin, understatement.

> Either way, wouldn't a genre like "stoner music" vary geographically? I was
> in the northeast in the '70s and the stoners I met had diverse taste. Some
> like top 40 (ACDC, Bad Company, Kansas), some like mellow rock (the Dead,
> Allman Bros., Ten Years After), and some were still into what peaked in the
> '60s (Beatles and Indian). The clubbers liked BritPop. Where do you
> pigeonhole Witlessmongrel?

Prog plus boogie, based on King Crimson and Status Quo mentions. See if
he knows Uriah Heep, Budgie, Hawkwind.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Nov 29, 5:26*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > > Some like top 40 (ACDC, Bad Company, Kansas),
> >
> > If you can name me a top 40 AC/DC song, I'll give you a thousand dollars.
>
> "Stiff Upper Lip" (#1, Billboard Mainstream Rock charts), "Satellite
> Blues" (#7), "Safe in New York City" (#31).
>
> "Back in Black" (#37, Billboard Top 100), "You Shook Me All Night
> Long" (#35).

"Moneytalks" (#23 Billboard Hot 100)

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
vinyl anachronist > wrote:

> On Nov 29, 6:23*pm, Big Al > wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:38:02 -0800, "badlands420"
> >
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >> *Ask him about his "victimization" by adultery.
> >
> > >Somebody actually married that tool?
> >
> > And Scott actually socializes with this collection of doucebags?
>
> What's a doucebag?

It's what you wrap up a douce in.

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

> > > > Some like top 40 (ACDC, Bad Company, Kansas),
> > >
> > > If you can name me a top 40 AC/DC song, I'll give you a thousand dollars.
> >
> > "Stiff Upper Lip" (#1, Billboard Mainstream Rock charts), "Satellite
> > Blues" (#7), "Safe in New York City" (#31).
> >
> > "Back in Black" (#37, Billboard Top 100), "You Shook Me All Night
> > Long" (#35).
>
> "Moneytalks" (#23 Billboard Hot 100)

Good luck collecting your dough from boopsie....

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

> > > And Scott actually socializes with this collection of doucebags?
> >
> > What's a doucebag?
>
> It's what you wrap up a douce in.

Not a single scrotum joke. Well, maybe Shhh will have one.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 8:51*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > > And Scott actually socializes with this collection of doucebags?
>
> > > What's a doucebag?
>
> > It's what you wrap up a douce in.
>
> Not a single scrotum joke. Well, maybe Shhh will have one.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 5:43*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 29, 3:38*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > *Ask him about his "victimization" by adultery.
>
> > Somebody actually married that tool?
>
> *Obviously she didn't take their vows seriously.

Is your wife taking your vows seriously when she rolls her eyes at you
every time you turn your back? Is that honoring and cherishing?

>
> *I met her briefly and while she seemed to be a much nicer person than
> him,
> I'll bet she could and probably did piledrive him when he didn't take
> out the trash.

Now you've stepped into Fantasyland.

>
> *Then she left him with special needs kids he keeps whining the gov't
> should
> give him insurance for.

And now you're on to the blatant lies again.

By the way, has your wife ever trimmed that huge bush of hers? Jesus
Christ.

[badlands420]

> Nice IKYABWAI, genius.

Well, since I'm such a chronic masturbator, it's only fitting for me to
borrow Pee Wee Herman's material.

[badlands420]

>It's not meant to be original. It's meant to be a parody of your
>overall intelligence.

What makes you think I'm any less intelligent when I wear overalls?

[badlands420]

> Pot makes you sleepy?

Not like heroin does.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > > > Some like top 40 (ACDC, Bad Company, Kansas),
> > > >
> > > > If you can name me a top 40 AC/DC song, I'll give you a thousand
> > > > dollars.
> > >
> > > "Stiff Upper Lip" (#1, Billboard Mainstream Rock charts), "Satellite
> > > Blues" (#7), "Safe in New York City" (#31).
> > >
> > > "Back in Black" (#37, Billboard Top 100), "You Shook Me All Night
> > > Long" (#35).
> >
> > "Moneytalks" (#23 Billboard Hot 100)
>
> Good luck collecting your dough from boopsie....

If he's good for the first $5,000, I'll be fine.

Stephen

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 9:29*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Pot makes you sleepy?
>
> Not like heroin does.

So you're going to welch on the $1000 you owe me?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 29, 5:35*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 29, 3:25*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > Another obfuscation, I see.
>
> > My heavens, you smoke much better weed than I do.
>
> Wanna bet? *He bragged about his taste for scotch here so
> to be hospitable I picked up a bottle of Glenlivet.
> I poured him a shot on the rocks and the poor slob busted into
> a cold sweat before it touched his lips.
> I had to get him some ice water before he went into a full
> state of shock. Needless to say the drink went untouched.
> Turns out he's diabete and likely can't drink.
> Still, on usenet he can be whoever he wants to be.
>
> * Ask him about his "victimization" by adultery.
> * Now that's worth the popcorn.

Where's your favorite weed rom, dum-dum? LoL.

[badlands420]

> So you're going to welch on the $1000 you owe me?

No, come on over and get it. We'll drink some scotch.

[badlands420]

> So you're going to welch on the $1000 you owe me?

No, come on over and get it. We'll drink some scotch.

[badlands420]

> So you're going to welch on the $1000 you owe me?

No, come on over and get it. We'll drink some scotch.

[badlands420]

> So you're going to welch on the $1000 you owe me?

No, come on over and get it. We'll drink some scotch.

[badlands420]

> So you're going to welch on the $1000 you owe me?

No, come on over and get it. We'll drink some scotch.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 29, 5:43*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 29, 3:38*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > *Ask him about his "victimization" by adultery.
>
> > Somebody actually married that tool?
>
> *Obviously she didn't take their vows seriously.
>
> *I met her briefly and while she seemed to be a much nicer person than
> him,
> I'll bet she could and probably did piledrive him when he didn't take
> out the trash.
>
> *Then she left him with special needs kids he keeps whining the gov't
> should
> give him insurance for.

Ah, weed, the great "equalizier".

So why is your woman harvesting crops, dum-dum?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie yanks the teat, but the milk of humor done run dry.

> >It's not meant to be original. It's meant to be a parody of your
> >overall intelligence.
>
> What makes you think I'm any less intelligent when I wear overalls?

Nope. Nothing.

[badlands420]

> boopsie yanks the teat, but the milk of humor done run dry.

Yet here you and your buddies are, hanging on my every word. It's like
having three little Taco Bell Chihuahuas yipping at my heels, except
Chihuahuas are occasionally amusing.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 29, 6:56*pm, "ScottW" > wrote:
> On Nov 29, 4:43 pm, vinyl anachronist > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 29, 6:26 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 29, 4:20 pm, George M. Middius >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Boon said:
>
> > > > > > > At the same time, I once had an argument with him about pot. He
> > > > > > > had a
> > > > > > > zero-tolerance approach to its legalization, even though he
> > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > provide no evidence of its harmful effects.
>
> > > > > > That's odd. Legalization would turn weed into a profit center for
> > > > > > government
> > > > > > instead of the money pit that interdiction is now. Doesn't Scottie
> > > > > > realize
> > > > > > that every dollar of tax paid by others is one he doesn't have to
> > > > > > worry
> > > > > > about?
>
> > > > > He said it used to irritate his lungs, and that was enough to make
> > > > > it
> > > > > BAD in his eyes. Remember, Scott always thinks about how the issues
> > > > > affect HIS life.
>
> > > > Then Witless should want tobacco to be banned also. What's his plan
> > > > for
> > > > replacing the lost tax revenue from tobacco products?
>
> > > *Marc's just making **** up...again.
>
> > You mean like how you've lied about my family?
>
> > We had that conversation in your kitchen.
>
> *Only in your fantasies.
>
> > I would have destroyed your
> > feeble argument, but I was a guest in your house.
>
> Just like you destroy arguments on usenet.
> With pure fiction.

Is 2pid talking trash?

Really?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 29, 2:28*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >Actually, it sounds like you get off thinking about strangers thinking
> >about your cock.
>
> Mrs. Badlands, just a moment ago: "Dude, this guy spends more time thinking
> about your cock than I do!"
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I bent over a headless corpse and anally ****ed her.

Did you hava a good weekend, "cupcake"" LMOFLZ!

[badlands420]

> I bent over a headless corpse and anally ****ed her.

Oh well, at least you finally found a woman who didn't turn you down.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie, don't be selfish.

> > boopsie yanks the teat, but the milk of humor done run dry.

> Yet here you and your buddies are, hanging on my every word.

Did you notice you aren't get any compliments on your "jokes"?

> It's like having three little Taco Bell Chihuahuas

Oooh. Bad taste. She died recently. Are you a necrophiliac like Bratzi?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > > I would have destroyed your
> > > feeble argument, but I was a guest in your house.
> >
> > Just like you destroy arguments on usenet.
> > With pure fiction.
>
> Is 2pid talking trash?
> Really?

Scottie R angry... again.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie launches another spitball.

> > I bent over a headless corpse and anally ****ed her.
>
> Oh well, at least you finally found a woman who didn't turn you down.

If you weren't such a ****, somebody might chuckle at that gibe. Or even give
you an LOL. But since you are a ****, no such luck.

[badlands420]

> If you weren't such a ****, somebody might chuckle at that gibe. Or even
> give
> you an LOL. But since you are a ****, no such luck.

As I'm not a 12 year old girl, LOLs don't mean much to me.

Sincerely,
****420

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 28, 6:03*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote in ...
>
> > On Nov 28, 4:44 pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> >> If I was regarded as witty by someone like you, I'd ****ing kill myself.
>
> > You sound just like 2pid.
>
> > There is no greater "flame" than that. ROLZLMZAOZ!
>
> Yeah, you really got me that time. I think the three of you should have one
> of your little self-congratulatory circle jerks in celebration.

Or we could discuss the point I made regarding the Vikings' defense
vs. offense. ROTFLMAOZ!

[badlands420]

> Did you notice you aren't get any compliments on your "jokes"?

No, but that's quite reassuring now that you mention it.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie has a breakthrough.

> > If you weren't such a ****, somebody might chuckle at that gibe. Or even
> > give you an LOL. But since you are a ****, no such luck.

> As[sic] I'm not a 12 year old girl

Bad grammar aside, congratulations are in order. Embracing reality is the
first step on the road to recovery.

Now just stay out of those chatrooms, Louella.

[badlands420]

> Bad grammar aside, congratulations are in order. Embracing reality is the
> first step on the road to recovery.

Have you ever seen a human vagina?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie, have you actually learned how to type with one hand?

> > Bad grammar aside, congratulations are in order. Embracing reality is the
> > first step on the road to recovery.
>
> Have you ever seen a human vagina?

Of course I have. I've never been inside one, though.

[badlands420]

>> Have you ever seen a human vagina?
>
> Of course I have.

Your mom's doesn't count, George.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie, you are quite the little lowlife.

> >> Have you ever seen a human vagina?
> >
> > Of course I have.
>
> Your mom's doesn't count, George.

How about your mom's?

[badlands420]

> How about your mom's?

My mother's a goat, you sick ****.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 10:15*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > So you're going to welch on the $1000 you owe me?
>
> No, come on over and get it. We'll drink some scotch.

Give me your address. I hope it's better scotch than the cheap crap
Scott tried to serve me. And don't ruin it by putting it on the rocks.
No self-respecting scotch drinker puts ice cubes in a glass of single
malt.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 29, 10:57*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > boopsie yanks the teat, but the milk of humor done run dry.
>
> Yet here you and your buddies are, hanging on my every word. It's like
> having three little Taco Bell Chihuahuas yipping at my heels, except
> Chihuahuas are occasionally amusing.

And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 12:10*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > Did you notice you aren't get any compliments on your "jokes"?
>
> No, but that's quite reassuring now that you mention it.

Ignorance is bliss.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 30, 7:48*am, Boon > wrote:
> On Nov 30, 12:10*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > Did you notice you aren't get any compliments on your "jokes"?
>
> > No, but that's quite reassuring now that you mention it.
>
> Ignorance is bliss.

It's pretty bad when all you do is recycle lines from 2pid: "Being
insulted by the likes of you is a compliment".

Oooops. When 2pid says it it's actually "Being insulted by the like's
of you is a complement". LoL.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 9:09*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 7:48*am, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 12:10*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > > Did you notice you aren't get any compliments on your "jokes"?
>
> > > No, but that's quite reassuring now that you mention it.
>
> > Ignorance is bliss.
>
> It's pretty bad when all you do is recycle lines from 2pid: "Being
> insulted by the likes of you is a compliment".
>
> Oooops. When 2pid says it it's actually "Being insulted by the like's
> of you is a complement". LoL.

It's clear that our pot-smoking buddy has either ran out of gas...or
he left his house already running on fumes. It amazes me when witless
schmoes like this think they're somehow getting the better of anyone.

[badlands420]

> And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.

Where, at the disembowling alley?

[badlands420]

> And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.

Where, at the disembowling alley?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 30, 10:12*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.
>
> Where, at the disembowling alley?

Sugar, is that you? LoL.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 10:12*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.
>
> Where, at the disembowling alley?

Are you trying to be ironic again? Tsk tsk.

By the way, where's my $1000?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 10:54*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 10:12*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.
>
> > Where, at the disembowling alley?
>
> Sugar, is that you? LoL.

In my defense, my right hand is all wrapped up in a bandage due to a
knife mishap. I'm sure there will be plenty of typos to come.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 30, 1:11*pm, Boon > wrote:
> On Nov 30, 10:54*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 10:12*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > > And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.
>
> > > Where, at the disembowling alley?
>
> > Sugar, is that you? LoL.
>
> In my defense, my right hand is all wrapped up in a bandage due to a
> knife mishap. I'm sure there will be plenty of typos to come.

Typo "gotchas" are typical of Sugar. I wonder if he's a pothead too.

[badlands420]

>In my defense, my right hand is all wrapped up in a bandage due to a
knife mishap.

Wow, you can even **** up suicide?

[badlands420]

> Are you trying to be ironic again?

No, I'm just mocking you, Zorro.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > > And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.
> >
> > Where, at the disembowling alley?
>
> Are you trying to be ironic again? Tsk tsk.

I'll bet even boopsie knows that was just a pun.

> By the way, where's my $1000?

Shouldn't that be $5000?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Witless's eyelids are clamped shut.

> > We had this discussion in front of Art (who was on my side)
>
> Marc Phillips lying on usenet again,
> and the sun rises.

You didn't contradict Marc's assertion that you're totally against legalizing
pot because you don't like the smoke. Did somebody 'misinterpret' your
earlier barking, or are you being 'misinterpreted' now?i


--
"There are words and there are definitions.
Sometimes the definition of a word changes with context."
-- Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, June 24, 2009

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 1:37*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >In my defense, my right hand is all wrapped up in a bandage due to a
>
> knife mishap.
>
> Wow, you can even **** up suicide?

No, I can't. You mom likes to be cut when I **** her. She says it
reminds her of the pain she feels knowing that she brought you into
the world.

(Note, everyone, that I had to step down to a momma joke so our
pothead football geek could finally feel properly insulted.)

[badlands420]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Boon said:
>
>> > > And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.
>> >
>> > Where, at the disembowling alley?
>>
>> Are you trying to be ironic again? Tsk tsk.
>
> I'll bet even boopsie knows that was just a pun.
>
>> By the way, where's my $1000?
>
> Shouldn't that be $5000?


Dear Goat****er,

http://tinyurl.com/lfyqlv

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 1:42*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 29, 5:58*pm, vinyl anachronist >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 29, 6:56*pm, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 29, 4:43 pm, vinyl anachronist > wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 29, 6:26 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Nov 29, 4:20 pm, George M. Middius >
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Boon said:
>
> > > > > > > > > At the same time, I once had an argument with him about pot. He
> > > > > > > > > had a
> > > > > > > > > zero-tolerance approach to its legalization, even though he
> > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > provide no evidence of its harmful effects.
>
> > > > > > > > That's odd. Legalization would turn weed into a profit center for
> > > > > > > > government
> > > > > > > > instead of the money pit that interdiction is now. Doesn't Scottie
> > > > > > > > realize
> > > > > > > > that every dollar of tax paid by others is one he doesn't have to
> > > > > > > > worry
> > > > > > > > about?
>
> > > > > > > He said it used to irritate his lungs, and that was enough to make
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > BAD in his eyes. Remember, Scott always thinks about how the issues
> > > > > > > affect HIS life.
>
> > > > > > Then Witless should want tobacco to be banned also. What's his plan
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > replacing the lost tax revenue from tobacco products?
>
> > > > > *Marc's just making **** up...again.
>
> > > > You mean like how you've lied about my family?
>
> > > > We had that conversation in your kitchen.
>
> > > *Only in your fantasies.
>
> > > > I would have destroyed your
> > > > feeble argument, but I was a guest in your house.
>
> > > Just like you destroy arguments on usenet.
> > > With pure fiction.
>
> > So now you're admitting you are a big pothead just like your dad,
> > "Badlands420"?
>
> > We had this discussion in front of Art (who was on my side)
>
> *Marc Phillips lying on usenet again,
> *and the sun rises.

You have a habit of being unable and unwilling to stand behind your
own words. There's not a single person here who thinks I lied about
what you said that day. Not even you, you big pussy.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 1:51*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in messagenews:1388h5ht5kaoo7rg7ff2qosq3fqvg3vrfj@4ax .com...
>
>
>
> > Boon said:
>
> >> > > And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.
>
> >> > Where, at the disembowling alley?
>
> >> Are you trying to be ironic again? Tsk tsk.
>
> > I'll bet even boopsie knows that was just a pun.
>
> >> By the way, where's my $1000?
>
> > Shouldn't that be $5000?
>
> Dear Goat****er,
>
> http://tinyurl.com/lfyqlv

So now you're a total douchebag. Kudos!

[badlands420]

"badlands420" > wrote in message
...
>
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> Boon said:
>>
>>> > > And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.
>>> >
>>> > Where, at the disembowling alley?
>>>
>>> Are you trying to be ironic again? Tsk tsk.
>>
>> I'll bet even boopsie knows that was just a pun.
>>
>>> By the way, where's my $1000?
>>
>> Shouldn't that be $5000?
>
>
> Dear Goat****er,
>
> http://tinyurl.com/lfyqlv


PS- Is it true your initials really stand for "Goats Molest Me?"

[badlands420]

>There's not a single person here who thinks I lied about what you said that
>day.

Speaking for others because you know your opinion doesn't matter =
Cataclysmically epic fail

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 1:58*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >There's not a single person here who thinks I lied about what you said that
> >day.
>
> Speaking for others because you know your opinion doesn't matter =
> Cataclysmically epic fail

If you say so, pothead. To people unaddled by drugs, that sounds just
like truth by assertion.

[badlands420]

I'd like to thank Zorro, Goat****er, and FailOut Boy for making me the new
pwner of this newsgroup (term used loosely). Y'all are entirely too kind.

[badlands420]

>If you say so, pothead. To people unaddled by drugs, that sounds just
like truth by assertion.

http://tinyurl.com/yd6gmgz

[badlands420]

>Well, it's obvious that you aren't fazed by most of our comments
>because you're too dumb or high to understand them. I'm just trying to
help a pothead out.

http://tinyurl.com/yzf799y

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 2:32*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 30, 11:52*am, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 30, 1:42*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 29, 5:58*pm, vinyl anachronist >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 29, 6:56*pm, "ScottW" > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Nov 29, 4:43 pm, vinyl anachronist > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Nov 29, 6:26 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 29, 4:20 pm, George M. Middius >
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Boon said:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > At the same time, I once had an argument with him about pot. He
> > > > > > > > > > > had a
> > > > > > > > > > > zero-tolerance approach to its legalization, even though he
> > > > > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > provide no evidence of its harmful effects.
>
> > > > > > > > > > That's odd. Legalization would turn weed into a profit center for
> > > > > > > > > > government
> > > > > > > > > > instead of the money pit that interdiction is now. Doesn't Scottie
> > > > > > > > > > realize
> > > > > > > > > > that every dollar of tax paid by others is one he doesn't have to
> > > > > > > > > > worry
> > > > > > > > > > about?
>
> > > > > > > > > He said it used to irritate his lungs, and that was enough to make
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > BAD in his eyes. Remember, Scott always thinks about how the issues
> > > > > > > > > affect HIS life.
>
> > > > > > > > Then Witless should want tobacco to be banned also. What's his plan
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > replacing the lost tax revenue from tobacco products?
>
> > > > > > > *Marc's just making **** up...again.
>
> > > > > > You mean like how you've lied about my family?
>
> > > > > > We had that conversation in your kitchen.
>
> > > > > *Only in your fantasies.
>
> > > > > > I would have destroyed your
> > > > > > feeble argument, but I was a guest in your house.
>
> > > > > Just like you destroy arguments on usenet.
> > > > > With pure fiction.
>
> > > > So now you're admitting you are a big pothead just like your dad,
> > > > "Badlands420"?
>
> > > > We had this discussion in front of Art (who was on my side)
>
> > > *Marc Phillips lying on usenet again,
> > > *and the sun rises.
>
> > You have a habit of being unable and unwilling to stand behind your
> > own words.
> > There's not a single person here who thinks I lied about
> > what you said that day.
>
> *Isn't that why you love usenet? *You can make crap up and no one can
> really know for sure.
> *Oh well, I know you lied. You know you lied. That's all that matters.

No, I didn't lie. You did. Just like the story about the scotch. Jim
Sanders had you pegged all along. What a backstabber and liar you are.
That's why he asked you to leave his home.

>
> > Not even you, you big pussy.
>
> *Says the limp pillsbury dough boy from behind his keyboard.
> *Maybe if you stomp your feet, spit, and drool like a real texan
> while you type your macho charade will work better.
> *Then again, maybe not.

Boy, you get really defensive whenever your manhood is called into
question. Are you a closet case?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 2:33*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 30, 12:12*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 1:58*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
>
> > > >There's not a single person here who thinks I lied about what you said that
> > > >day.
>
> > > Speaking for others because you know your opinion doesn't matter =
> > > Cataclysmically epic fail
>
> > If you say so, pothead. To people unaddled by drugs, that sounds just
> > like truth by assertion.
>
> * IKYABWAI.

No it's not, 2pid. Show me where he accused me of truth by assertion.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 30, 3:24*pm, ScottW > wrote:

> * Let me know when you grow the cahones to call someones manhood
> into question. *I haven't seen any sign of it yet.

LoL.

Say, 2pid, why are you so angry all of the time? Are you even aware of
your anger issues?

And are you even dimly aware of why nobody likes you? LoL.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > * Let me know when you grow the cahones[sic] to call someones[sic] manhood
> > into question. *I haven't seen any sign of it yet.
>
> LoL.

You're laughter is fonie.

> Say, 2pid, why are you so angry all of the time? Are you even aware of
> your anger issues?

<grrr...>

> And are you even dimly aware of why nobody likes you? LoL.

Scottie would kill himself if he believed any Normals like him. Look how he
turned on Marc and Sacky.



--

Let me know when you grow the cahones to call someones manhood into question.

Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, Nov. 30 2009

[badlands420]

George in his natural environment:

http://2.media.tumblr.com/MTIfU5tQroakwx1niD0CFOAIo1_400.jpg



"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> Shhhh! said:
>
>> > Let me know when you grow the cahones[sic] to call someones[sic]
>> > manhood
>> > into question. I haven't seen any sign of it yet.
>>
>> LoL.
>
> You're laughter is fonie.
>
>> Say, 2pid, why are you so angry all of the time? Are you even aware of
>> your anger issues?
>
> <grrr...>
>
>> And are you even dimly aware of why nobody likes you? LoL.
>
> Scottie would kill himself if he believed any Normals like him. Look how
> he
> turned on Marc and Sacky.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Let me know when you grow the cahones to call someones manhood into
> question.
>
> Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, Nov. 30 2009

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

boopsie Shelleyed:

> > Scottie would kill himself if he believed any Normals like him. Look how
> > he turned on Marc and Sacky.

> George in his natural environment:

I have just the Scottie-ism for this occasion: "Your a doody-head, go bust
you're own cahonies."

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 3:24*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 30, 12:55*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 2:32*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > *Marc Phillips lying on usenet again,
> > > > > *and the sun rises.
>
> > > > You have a habit of being unable and unwilling to stand behind your
> > > > own words.
> > > > There's not a single person here who thinks I lied about
> > > > what you said that day.
>
> > > *Isn't that why you love usenet? *You can make crap up and no one can
> > > really know for sure.
> > > *Oh well, I know you lied. You know you lied. That's all that matters.
>
> > No, I didn't lie. You did. Just like the story about the scotch.
>
> *Keep telling yourself that...and keep a hanky to wipe your sweaty
> brow
> in case someone offers you a drink.
> *And try not spasm so much. It's a bit weird. I thought I'd have to
> call the
> paramedics.

Yes, you offered me a drink, and I started sweating and went into
spasms, so much so that you thought about calling a paramedic. Is
there anyone here who thinks that's plausible? Or is Scott making this
all up?

>
> > Jim
> > Sanders had you pegged all along. What a backstabber and liar you are.
>
> *Backstabber? *I'm telling you straight out you're a lying scumbag.

I'm calling you the same.

>
> > That's why he asked you to leave his home.
>
> *LoL, *I recall his wife telling me she didn't like you much
> or maybe it was Sanders himself. *She thought you were creepy
> and read too much into small gestures.

Hmmm. "Marc is creepy because he reads too much into small gestures."
That's not really plausible, either. But let's say she did say that.
If you told anyone close to me that I read too much into small
gestures, they think you were nuts. I'm kind of the opposite. But I'd
rather have her say that then to kick me out of her home, call me a
lying, low-class backstabber and to instruct her friends not to go
anywhere near you. That, after all, is what Jim did with you.

>
>
>
> > > > Not even you, you big pussy.
>
> > > *Says the limp pillsbury dough boy from behind his keyboard.
> > > *Maybe if you stomp your feet, spit, and drool like a real texan
> > > while you type your macho charade will work better.
> > > *Then again, maybe not.
>
> > Boy, you get really defensive whenever your manhood is called into
> > question.
>
> * Let me know when you grow the cahones to call someones manhood
> into question. *I haven't seen any sign of it yet.

I just called your manhood into question, idiot. Or did that sentence
sound different in your brain?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 5:01*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> George in his natural environment:
>
> http://2.media.tumblr.com/MTIfU5tQroakwx1niD0CFOAIo1_400.jpg

I don't think anyone is clicking on your links. Just say what you want
to say.

[badlands420]

> I don't think anyone is clicking on your links. Just say what you want
to say.

http://tinyurl.com/yfrdomm

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 5:46*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > I don't think anyone is clicking on your links. Just say what you want
>
> to say.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yfrdomm

Let me guess. Fail? Fail fail fail? Is it s fail link for fail? Fail!

[badlands420]

I'm sensing a lot of repressed gay man-love between Scott, Zorro,
Goat****er, and FailOut Boy. You guys aren't fooling anyone with this fake
hatred. Just get it over with and start teabagging each other.


"Boon" > wrote in message
...
On Nov 30, 3:24 pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 30, 12:55 pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 2:32 pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > > > > Marc Phillips lying on usenet again,
> > > > > and the sun rises.
>
> > > > You have a habit of being unable and unwilling to stand behind your
> > > > own words.
> > > > There's not a single person here who thinks I lied about
> > > > what you said that day.
>
> > > Isn't that why you love usenet? You can make crap up and no one can
> > > really know for sure.
> > > Oh well, I know you lied. You know you lied. That's all that matters.
>
> > No, I didn't lie. You did. Just like the story about the scotch.
>
> Keep telling yourself that...and keep a hanky to wipe your sweaty
> brow
> in case someone offers you a drink.
> And try not spasm so much. It's a bit weird. I thought I'd have to
> call the
> paramedics.

Yes, you offered me a drink, and I started sweating and went into
spasms, so much so that you thought about calling a paramedic. Is
there anyone here who thinks that's plausible? Or is Scott making this
all up?

>
> > Jim
> > Sanders had you pegged all along. What a backstabber and liar you are.
>
> Backstabber? I'm telling you straight out you're a lying scumbag.

I'm calling you the same.

>
> > That's why he asked you to leave his home.
>
> LoL, I recall his wife telling me she didn't like you much
> or maybe it was Sanders himself. She thought you were creepy
> and read too much into small gestures.

Hmmm. "Marc is creepy because he reads too much into small gestures."
That's not really plausible, either. But let's say she did say that.
If you told anyone close to me that I read too much into small
gestures, they think you were nuts. I'm kind of the opposite. But I'd
rather have her say that then to kick me out of her home, call me a
lying, low-class backstabber and to instruct her friends not to go
anywhere near you. That, after all, is what Jim did with you.

>
>
>
> > > > Not even you, you big pussy.
>
> > > Says the limp pillsbury dough boy from behind his keyboard.
> > > Maybe if you stomp your feet, spit, and drool like a real texan
> > > while you type your macho charade will work better.
> > > Then again, maybe not.
>
> > Boy, you get really defensive whenever your manhood is called into
> > question.
>
> Let me know when you grow the cahones to call someones manhood
> into question. I haven't seen any sign of it yet.

I just called your manhood into question, idiot. Or did that sentence
sound different in your brain?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 30, 5:50*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> I'm sensing a lot of repressed gay man-love between Scott, Zorro,
> Goat****er, and FailOut Boy. You guys aren't fooling anyone with this fake
> hatred. Just get it over with and start teabagging each other.

I'm disappointed. Only one fail in that post. It's not fail enough, I
expect at least three fails in every one of your failposts. Don't fail
me!

[badlands420]

> Let me guess. Fail? Fail fail fail? Is it s fail link for fail? Fail!

Nope, worse than that.

http://tinyurl.com/yghk77o

[badlands420]

>I'm disappointed. Only one fail in that post. It's not fail enough, I
>expect at least three fails in every one of your failposts. Don't fail
me!

If fail was gayness, you'd be Charles Nelson Reilly felching Elton John's
steamy jizz load out of Richard Simmons' asshole.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Nov 30, 5:50*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Nov 30, 3:32*pm, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
> > I just called your manhood into question, idiot.
>
> * Real man know that's not possible on usenet.
> * But I see why you're confused.

Real man no spend all night on Usenet while pretty wife lie in bed and
wait.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Nov 30, 5:57*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >I'm disappointed. Only one fail in that post. It's not fail enough, I
> >expect at least three fails in every one of your failposts. Don't fail
>
> me!
>
> If fail was gayness, you'd be Charles Nelson Reilly felching Elton John's
> steamy jizz load out of Richard Simmons' asshole.

Don't use the word "jizz." Another moron here has a trademark on it.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Witless leaps from one fantasy to the next.

> > I just called your manhood into question, idiot.
>
> Real man[sic] know that's not possible on usenet.

Scoots, why aren't you ashamed of yourself? That's the question you should
address.


--

" This one was highlighted by MM to draw attention while I think
it's not the most aggregious provision but it still has issues."

-- Scottie Witlessmongrel, self-described excellent writer, Feb. 22 2009

[badlands420]

> If fail was gayness, you'd be Charles Nelson Reilly felching Elton John's
> santorum out of Richard Simmons' asshole.

Better?

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Nov 30, 10:54*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 10:12*am, "badlands420" > wrote:
> >
> > > > And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.
> >
> > > Where, at the disembowling alley?
> >
> > Sugar, is that you? LoL.
>
> In my defense, my right hand is all wrapped up in a bandage due to a
> knife mishap. I'm sure there will be plenty of typos to come.

RAO is badass, note.

Stephen

[GeoSynch]

Jilly autoeroticised:

> I bent over

Into your favorite fanny-bearing position.

> a headless corpse

The piecemeal approach to sex-reassignment surgery? Ouch!

> and anally ****ed her.

Thorougly screw yourself again, old girl?

[GeoSynch]

Pudge the Gimp minced:

> Did you notice you aren't get [sic] any compliments on your "jokes"?

Oh, the "irony" ... ;-)

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon yipped:

> And the Chihuahuas are completely disembowling you.

So you agree you're a vicious little ankle-biter.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon brayed:

> (Note, everyone, that I had to step down to a momma joke

And your momma's got two of them: her own and you.

[GeoSynch]

"MiNe 109" strolled down memory lane:

> Prog plus boogie, based on King Crimson and Status Quo mentions. See if
> he knows Uriah Heep,

Only one good song "Easy Livin'" but what a great one it was.

> Budgie,

Never turn your back on a friend.

> Hawkwind.

What's the basis for the name Hawkwind?
Alright, I'll tell ya: Nik Turner's proclivities for hawkin' loogies and cuttin'
farts.
"Brainstorm" is the highlight of Space Ritual.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 29, 10:15*pm, "badlands420" > wrote:
> > So you're going to welch on the $1000 you owe me?
>
> No, come on over and get it. We'll drink some scotch.