Old Home (Month) at Stereophile?

[Arny Krueger]

Just noticed that both Robert Harley and Corey Greenberg wrote leading
articles that appear in the current Stereophile.

How long has this been going on?

I thought that Harley wrote for TAS?

[[email protected]]

>Just noticed that both Robert Harley and Corey Greenberg wrote leading
>articles that appear in the current Stereophile.
>
>How long has this been going on?
>
>I thought that Harley wrote for TAS?

If you look just before the text of the articles the date of publication
is given. The greenberg was 1993 for example.

Each week such reprints are common.

[Kalman Rubinson[_3_]]

On 3 Nov 2009 14:05:56 GMT, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

>Just noticed that both Robert Harley and Corey Greenberg wrote leading
>articles that appear in the current Stereophile.

Why do you think that? I think you are seeing some of their old stuff
posted on the website.

Kal

[Sonnova]

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:05:56 -0800, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article >):

> Just noticed that both Robert Harley and Corey Greenberg wrote leading
> articles that appear in the current Stereophile.
>
> How long has this been going on?
>
> I thought that Harley wrote for TAS?
>
>

I haven't seen Harley in "Stereophile" for years. He's the current editor at
TAS, not just a writer. And I thought that Greenberg had been completely
discredited long ago. I guess that what comes around, goes around.....

[Arny Krueger]

"Kalman Rubinson" > wrote in message

> On 3 Nov 2009 14:05:56 GMT, "Arny Krueger"
> > wrote:
>
>> Just noticed that both Robert Harley and Corey Greenberg
>> wrote leading articles that appear in the current
>> Stereophile.
>
> Why do you think that? I think you are seeing some of
> their old stuff posted on the website.
>
> Kal

Yes, the way their home page is set up confused me.

Thanks for the clarification.

[Arny Krueger]

"Kalman Rubinson" > wrote in message

> On 3 Nov 2009 14:05:56 GMT, "Arny Krueger"
> > wrote:
>
>> Just noticed that both Robert Harley and Corey Greenberg
>> wrote leading articles that appear in the current
>> Stereophile.
>
> Why do you think that? I think you are seeing some of
> their old stuff posted on the website.

Yes, the way their home page is set up confused me.

Thanks for the clarification.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Kalman Rubinson" > wrote in message
>
> > On 3 Nov 2009 14:05:56 GMT, "Arny Krueger"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Just noticed that both Robert Harley and Corey Greenberg
> >> wrote leading articles that appear in the current
> >> Stereophile.
> >
> > Why do you think that? I think you are seeing some of
> > their old stuff posted on the website.
> >
> > Kal
>
> Yes, the way their home page is set up confused me.

It seems quite clear when you click on the article. It shows the date
of publication.

[[email protected]]

On Nov 3, 7:19=A0pm, Kalman Rubinson > wrote:
> On 3 Nov 2009 14:05:56 GMT, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >Just noticed that both Robert Harley and Corey Greenberg
> > wrote leadingarticles that appear in the current Stereophile.
>
> Why do you think that? =A0I think you are seeing some of their
> old stuff posted on the website.

That's correct. Having posted almost every Stereophile
review in our free on-line archives going back to 1996,
I am now working on reviews from the first half of the
1990s. This includes reviews by writers who no longer
contribute to the magazine. To avoid confusion, these
old reviews are flagged as "Review/Classic" on our
home page and if you click on the home-page mention,
the date of original publication is cleary indicated.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile