Serious Question for Scottie

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Why do you think so many posters make insulting comments about your poor
reading and writing, about your inability to understand what's said to
you, and about your alienation from ordinary common sense?

If you can't formulate a coherent response, I'll be glad to provide you
with possible answers arranged in a multiple-choice format.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Oct 20, 1:15*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Why do you think so many posters make insulting comments about your poor
> reading and writing, about your inability to understand what's said to
> you, and about your alienation from ordinary common sense?
>
> If you can't formulate a coherent response, I'll be glad to provide you
> with possible answers arranged in a multiple-choice format.

It's because we're cowards and we can't get through the tangled
syntax, curious spelling choices and inconsistent grammar to bask in
his true message of love and peace.

Either that or it's because he's suffering from general paresis.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > Why do you think so many posters make insulting comments about your poor
> > reading and writing, about your inability to understand what's said to
> > you, and about your alienation from ordinary common sense?
> >
> > If you can't formulate a coherent response, I'll be glad to provide you
> > with possible answers arranged in a multiple-choice format.
>
> It's because we're cowards and we can't get through the tangled
> syntax, curious spelling choices and inconsistent grammar to bask in
> his true message of love and peace.

Witless just yapped an indirect reply in another post. I criticized his
nonsensical reply to my "The George" question, and Witless barked that his
profound 'thought' was too deep for me to understand.

> Either that or it's because he's suffering from general paresis.

Does that mean delusional?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Oct 20, 2:27*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Boon said:
>
> > > Why do you think so many posters make insulting comments about your poor
> > > reading and writing, about your inability to understand what's said to
> > > you, and about your alienation from ordinary common sense?
>
> > > If you can't formulate a coherent response, I'll be glad to provide you
> > > with possible answers arranged in a multiple-choice format.
>
> > It's because we're cowards and we can't get through the tangled
> > syntax, curious spelling choices and inconsistent grammar to bask in
> > his true message of love and peace.
>
> Witless just yapped an indirect reply in another post. I criticized his
> nonsensical reply to my "The George" question, and Witless barked that his
> profound 'thought' was too deep for me to understand.
>
> > Either that or it's because he's suffering from general paresis.
>
> Does that mean delusional?

It means his brain is rotting from the inside out. Maybe he got it
from his wife, which is why she no longer cares how he spends his
spare time.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 20, 1:15*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Why do you think so many posters make insulting comments about your poor
> reading and writing, about your inability to understand what's said to
> you, and about your alienation from ordinary common sense?
>
> If you can't formulate a coherent response, I'll be glad to provide you
> with possible answers arranged in a multiple-choice format.

Your mean.Your also odious and not worthy. LoL.

[GeoSynch]

Pudge the Gimp minced:

> Why do you think so many posters make insulting comments

The Three Stooges and left-wing loons Jenn and McElroy only amount to a handful
of so-called "so many posters" whose collective opinion doesn't amount to a hill
of beans, but merely the aftereffects thereof.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
"GM Geo" > wrote:

> Pudge the Gimp minced:
>
> > Why do you think so many posters make insulting comments
>
> The Three Stooges and left-wing loons Jenn and McElroy

Honest question for you: What, to you, makes Stephen and me "left-wing
loons"?

[GeoSynch]

Jenn wrote:

>> The Three Stooges and left-wing loons Jenn and McElroy

> Honest question for you: What, to you, makes Stephen and me "left-wing
> loons"?

Only "left-wing loons" are prone to use the word "wingnut" when referring to
their counterparts, for starters, not to mention the sickening the whole
Obama-messiah adulation that kept gushing endlessly before the kaopectate of
economic reality put a stop to it.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
"GeoSynch" > wrote:

> Jenn wrote:
>
> >> The Three Stooges and left-wing loons Jenn and McElroy
>
> > Honest question for you: What, to you, makes Stephen and me "left-wing
> > loons"?
>
> Only "left-wing loons" are prone to use the word "wingnut" when referring to
> their counterparts, for starters, not to mention the sickening the whole
> Obama-messiah adulation that kept gushing endlessly before the kaopectate of
> economic reality put a stop to it.

I see. Thanks.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Oct 20, 11:59*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
>
> *"GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > Jenn wrote:
>
> > >> The Three Stooges and left-wing loons Jenn and McElroy
>
> > > Honest question for you: *What, to you, makes Stephen and me "left-wing
> > > loons"?
>
> > Only "left-wing loons" are prone to use the word "wingnut" when referring to
> > their counterparts, for starters, not to mention the sickening the whole
> > Obama-messiah adulation that kept gushing endlessly before the kaopectate of
> > economic reality put a stop to it.
>
> I see. *Thanks.

See, Jenn, you're a "loon" and you just have to take it. A wingnut
like Sugar doesn't have to take it because he called you a "loon"
first.

That's just how the wingnuts on the right roll.

If you weren't for McCain and a continuation of the corrupt (morally,
financially and intellectually) republicans, you were an "Obama
Adulator". And the "kaopectate of economic reality" is (of course) the
Dems' fault because they didn't have the reins of power for 16 years
in order to stop the republicans.

It's all right there in Beck's new book. Can't you read? LoL.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On Oct 20, 11:59*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> >
> > *"GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > > Jenn wrote:
> >
> > > >> The Three Stooges and left-wing loons Jenn and McElroy
> >
> > > > Honest question for you: *What, to you, makes Stephen and me "left-wing
> > > > loons"?
> >
> > > Only "left-wing loons" are prone to use the word "wingnut" when referring
> > > to
> > > their counterparts, for starters, not to mention the sickening the whole
> > > Obama-messiah adulation that kept gushing endlessly before the kaopectate
> > > of
> > > economic reality put a stop to it.
> >
> > I see. *Thanks.
>
> See, Jenn, you're a "loon" and you just have to take it. A wingnut
> like Sugar doesn't have to take it because he called you a "loon"
> first.
>
> That's just how the wingnuts on the right roll.
>
> If you weren't for McCain and a continuation of the corrupt (morally,
> financially and intellectually) republicans, you were an "Obama
> Adulator". And the "kaopectate of economic reality" is (of course) the
> Dems' fault because they didn't have the reins of power for 16 years
> in order to stop the republicans.
>
> It's all right there in Beck's new book. Can't you read? LoL.

I see. Thanks.
;-)

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > >> left-wing loons Jenn and McElroy
> >
> > > Honest question for you: What, to you, makes Stephen and me "left-wing
> > > loons"?
> >
> > Only "left-wing loons" are prone to use the word "wingnut" when referring to
> > their counterparts, for starters, not to mention the sickening the whole
> > Obama-messiah adulation that kept gushing endlessly before the kaopectate of
> > economic reality put a stop to it.
>
> I see. Thanks.

You expected something connected to your reality, maybe? LOL.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > Why do you think so many posters make insulting comments about your poor
> > reading and writing, about your inability to understand what's said to
> > you, and about your alienation from ordinary common sense?
> >
> > If you can't formulate a coherent response, I'll be glad to provide you
> > with possible answers arranged in a multiple-choice format.
>
> Your mean.Your also odious and not worthy. LoL.

If I were feeling energetic, I'd ask Google how many times Witless has
barked "mommyf'er" through the years. Then I'd compare and contrast that
with the vicious way he used to lunge at Gregipus.

Either way, I don't have fleas.