PDA

View Full Version : Re: wrap test


Mike
September 3rd 03, 08:47 PM
James Boyk > wrote in
:

> Are these lines infinitely long or do they wrap OK? long? long? long?
> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
> long? long? Working OK now?
>
>
> Sorry to take the b/width, but I don't know any other way to test.
>
> James Boyk
>
>

is that the RAP Wrap?

David Morgan \(MAMS\)
September 3rd 03, 10:01 PM
"John Noll" > wrote in message ...
>
> Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo
> Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo
> Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo
> Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo
> Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo
> Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo
> Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo
> Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo Yo
>

132 characters per line before wrapping on reply.

Peace... I'm out

Ben Bradley
September 3rd 03, 10:57 PM
In rec.audio.pro, Mike > wrote:

>James Boyk > wrote in
:
>
>> Are these lines infinitely long or do they wrap OK? long? long? long?
>> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
>> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
>> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
>> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
>> long? long? Working OK now?
>>
>>
>> Sorry to take the b/width, but I don't know any other way to test.

Incredibly enough, there is a newsgroup dedicated to just this kind
of thing, it's named alt.test.

>>
>> James Boyk
>>
>>
>
>is that the RAP Wrap?

"RAP it up, I'll take it."

Glenn Davis
September 4th 03, 07:29 PM
I was all ready to reply to a question regarding tape machine adjustment;
azimuth, WRAP, zenith (tilt) and height......

Glenn Davis
"Creating the perfect mix is like painting a 747 with Q-Tips"

Mike Clayton
September 5th 03, 04:41 AM
In article >, James Boyk > wrote:

> Are these lines infinitely long or do they wrap OK? long? long? long?
> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long?
> long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? long? Working OK now?
>
>
> Sorry to take the b/width, but I don't know any other way to test.
>
> James Boyk

Works fine here James.

Now back to your piano practice...

--
Mike Clayton

Harvey Gerst
September 5th 03, 07:06 AM
James Boyk > wrote:

>Mike Clayton wrote:
>> Works fine here James.
>>
>> Now back to your piano practice...

>schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
>schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
>schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert monk schubert schubert schubert
>schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
>schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
>schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
>
>James Boyk

Now, THAT'S funny !!!!

Harvey Gerst
Indian Trail Recording Studio
http://www.ITRstudio.com/

Mike Clayton
September 5th 03, 10:28 AM
In article >,
wrote:

> James Boyk > wrote:
>
> >Mike Clayton wrote:
> >> Works fine here James.
> >>
> >> Now back to your piano practice...
>
> >schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
schubert
> >schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
schubert
> >schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert monk schubert schubert schubert
> >schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
schubert
> >schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
schubert
> >schubert schubert schubert schubert schubert
> >
> >James Boyk
>
> Now, THAT'S funny !!!!
>
> Harvey Gerst
> Indian Trail Recording Studio
> http://www.ITRstudio.com/

Isn't it just Harvey! Now get the coffee grounds outa your nose and off
the new MCI console.

--
Mike Clayton

LeBaron & Alrich
September 5th 03, 03:31 PM
Mike Clayton > wrote:

> Now get the coffee grounds outa your nose and off
> the new MCI console.

There is no such thing as a "new MCI console".

--
ha

Harvey Gerst
September 5th 03, 05:56 PM
(LeBaron & Alrich) wrote:

>Mike Clayton > wrote:
>
>> Now get the coffee grounds outa your nose and off
>> the new MCI console.

>There is no such thing as a "new MCI console".

Well, it's still fairly new to us. Anyway, we just call it (along with the
room) the "Ohmygod" studio, cuz that's people's first reaction on seeing that
monster sitting inside the doublewide mobile home. From the outside, there's no
clue, except for 3, outside 4' wide, panels that don't exactly match the rest of
the doublewide, where we pulled off that entire outside wall section of the
trailer to get the console inside. That was funny. Think 3 Stooges, or Laurel
& Hardy, moving a piano up a long staircase. Kinda like that, but with about 14
guys.

Harvey Gerst
Indian Trail Recording Studio
http://www.ITRstudio.com/

NeilH011
September 6th 03, 01:14 AM
>Think 3 Stooges, or Laurel
>& Hardy, moving a piano up a long staircase. Kinda like that, but with about
>14
>guys.

OK, so, Keystone Kops or sumpin like that.

NeilH

LeBaron & Alrich
September 6th 03, 04:50 PM
Harvey Gerst > wrote:

> (LeBaron & Alrich) wrote:

> >Mike Clayton > wrote:

> >> Now get the coffee grounds outa your nose and off
> >> the new MCI console.

> >There is no such thing as a "new MCI console".
>
> Well, it's still fairly new to us.

I trust you trust I jested.

> Anyway, we just call it (along with the
> room) the "Ohmygod" studio,

See, folks, this here is professionatorialismness: The Pope turns a joke
into good marketing...

> cuz that's people's first reaction on seeing that monster sitting inside
> the doublewide mobile home. From the outside, there's no clue, except for
> 3, outside 4' wide, panels that don't exactly match the rest of the
> doublewide,

....but his finish carpentry skills are somehwat wanting.

> where we pulled off that entire outside wall section of the trailer to get
> the console inside. That was funny. Think 3 Stooges, or Laurel & Hardy,
> moving a piano up a long staircase. Kinda like that, but with about 14
> guys.

Gotta dig it. Twice here I took out a large window to get a Sphere
Eclipse C in/out. Plenty fun and funny. Better go look if the trim is
scarred.

--
ha

Dave Martin
September 6th 03, 05:14 PM
"LeBaron & Alrich" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> Gotta dig it. Twice here I took out a large window to get a Sphere
> Eclipse C in/out. Plenty fun and funny. Better go look if the trim is
> scarred.
>
No, there's nothing fun about moving a Sphere - I've done it twice, and in a
perfect world, will never have to do it again...

--
Dave Martin
Java Jive Studio
Nashville, TN
www.javajivestudio.com

Steve O'Neill
September 6th 03, 06:42 PM
Roger W. Norman wrote:
> How is it that women
> don't miss a damned thing a man does wrong?

Can I use that?

Rob Adelman
September 7th 03, 02:32 AM
Roger W. Norman wrote:
> You'd know because Lanis would have told you by now. How is it that women
> don't miss a damned thing a man does wrong?

Its in the programming. Its one of those yes/no things that just keeps
looping around and always resolves to no..

Roger W. Norman
September 7th 03, 05:24 PM
Sure, but I think it's pretty much a universal, so I don't need credit! <g>

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio
Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net.
See how far $20 really goes.




"Steve O'Neill" > wrote in message
...
> Roger W. Norman wrote:
> > How is it that women
> > don't miss a damned thing a man does wrong?
>
> Can I use that?
>