What do 2pid, Sugar and Clyde have in common?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

All three know for sure that God will Smite the US if gays are allowed
to marry.

[GeoSynch]

Jilly jived:

> All three know for sure that God will Smite the US if gays are allowed to
> marry.

Cultural decadence and depravity has historically been the harbinger of societal
destruction.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 25, 11:32*pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Jilly jived:
>
> > All three know for sure that God will Smite the US if gays are allowed to
> > marry.
>
> Cultural decadence and depravity has historically been the harbinger of societal
> destruction.

That's one...

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On Aug 25, 11:32*pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> > Jilly jived:
> >
> > > All three know for sure that God will Smite the US if gays are allowed to
> > > marry.
> >
> > Cultural decadence and depravity has historically been the harbinger of
> > societal
> > destruction.
>
> That's one...

lol

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 aug., 00:25, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> All three know for sure that God will Smite the US if gays are allowed
> to marry.

What God?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 26, 9:36*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 26 aug., 00:25, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > All three know for sure that God will Smite the US if gays are allowed
> > to marry.
>
> What God?

That's two...

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 aug., 12:04, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 9:36*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On 26 aug., 00:25, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > All three know for sure that God will Smite the US if gays are allowed
> > > to marry.
>
> > What God?
>
> That's two...

well, obviously I am not in conncurrence with God
smiting anybody for anything, so you should not
have counted me in, in the first place

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> > > > All three know for sure that God will Smite the US if gays are allowed
> > > > to marry.
> >
> > > What God?
> >
> > That's two...
>
> well, obviously I am not in conncurrence with God
> smiting anybody for anything, so you should not
> have counted me in, in the first place

Here's a real poser: Why do certain members of our armed forces oppose serving
alongside Gay citizens?

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 aug., 17:36, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > > > All three know for sure that God will Smite the US if gays are allowed
> > > > > to marry.
>
> > > > What God?
>
> > > That's two...
>
> > well, obviously I am not in conncurrence with God
> > smiting anybody for anything, so you should not
> > have counted me in, in the first place
>
> Here's a real poser: Why do certain members of our armed forces oppose serving
> alongside Gay citizens?


If the question were rephrased to refer to gay soldiers, I couldn't
answer that, you would have to ask any of the particular soldiers
who object to serving alongside gay soldiers. Whenever the military
or the President decides to change the policy, they will have to do
that,
like it or not.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> > Here's a real poser: Why do certain members of our armed forces oppose serving
> > alongside Gay citizens?

> If the question were rephrased to refer to gay soldiers, I couldn't
> answer that, you would have to ask any of the particular soldiers
> who object to serving alongside gay soldiers.

Still not as dumb as Scottie. Keep trying, though!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 26, 7:08*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > Here's a real poser: Why do certain members of our armed forces oppose serving
> > > alongside Gay citizens?
> > If the question were rephrased to refer to gay soldiers, I couldn't
> > answer that, you would have to ask any of the particular soldiers
> > who object to serving alongside gay soldiers.
>
> Still not as dumb as Scottie. Keep trying, though!

Well, he does think the military has the ability to change that
policy...

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 aug., 22:16, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 7:08*pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
> > Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > > Here's a real poser: Why do certain members of our armed forces oppose serving
> > > > alongside Gay citizens?
> > > If the question were rephrased to refer to gay soldiers, I couldn't
> > > answer that, you would have to ask any of the particular soldiers
> > > who object to serving alongside gay soldiers.
>
> > Still not as dumb as Scottie. Keep trying, though!
>
> Well, he does think the military has the ability to change that
> policy...

The Pres uses the military's resistence as cover.
If that were to disappear, he would be more likely to
reverse the policy

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 26, 9:29*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 26 aug., 22:16, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Aug 26, 7:08*pm, George M. Middius >
> > wrote:
>
> > > Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > > > Here's a real poser: Why do certain members of our armed forces oppose serving
> > > > > alongside Gay citizens?
> > > > If the question were rephrased to refer to gay soldiers, I couldn't
> > > > answer that, you would have to ask any of the particular soldiers
> > > > who object to serving alongside gay soldiers.
>
> > > Still not as dumb as Scottie. Keep trying, though!
>
> > Well, he does think the military has the ability to change that
> > policy...
>
> The Pres uses the military's resistence as cover.
> If that were to disappear, he would be more likely to
> reverse the policy

The military cannot change the policy.

Thanks for the confirmation. ;-)

[Clyde Slick]

On 27 aug., 01:26, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 26, 9:29*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 26 aug., 22:16, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On Aug 26, 7:08*pm, George M. Middius >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > > > > Here's a real poser: Why do certain members of our armed forces oppose serving
> > > > > > alongside Gay citizens?
> > > > > If the question were rephrased to refer to gay soldiers, I couldn't
> > > > > answer that, you would have to ask any of the particular soldiers
> > > > > who object to serving alongside gay soldiers.
>
> > > > Still not as dumb as Scottie. Keep trying, though!
>
> > > Well, he does think the military has the ability to change that
> > > policy...
>
> > The Pres uses the military's resistence as cover.
> > If that were to disappear, he would be more likely to
> > reverse the policy
>
> The military cannot change the policy.
>
> Thanks for the confirmation. ;-)

they can grease the poop chute!