Where did I go wrong?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Stynchie, I just saw your whiney retort to my earlier post. I'm surprised
you're still afraid of me. I haven't addressed you directly for months now.

More to the point is why you keep posting to RAO. You're the worst excuse for
a "christian" we've seen here since Marc sent the Krooborg packing, yet you
keep maintaining your false face of piety.

Why do you seek the punishment you get here? What need can it possibly serve?

[GeoSynch]

Pudge the Gimp minced:

> Stynchie, I just saw your whiney retort to my earlier post. I'm surprised
> you're still afraid of me. I haven't addressed you directly for months now.

Still "quaking in your dainty boots", 'lil Georgie?

> More to the point is why you keep posting to RAO.

Cause I darn well feel like it, much to the chagrin of self-appointed petty
little tyrants like you and the BaBoon, who think and act as if they own the
joint. What a joke you two are.

> You're the worst excuse for a "christian" we've seen here since Marc sent the
> Krooborg packing, yet you keep maintaining your false face of piety.

Homo-spun sophistries by the likes of you and your ilk, lifelong practitioners
of deceptiveness, are completely meaningless and ineffectual.

> Why do you seek the punishment you get here?

From who? You and the other two stooges? You must be joking. I've made BaBoon
bleed so badly, arguing with himself in posts, gloating unsubstantiable
readership claims that he then had his nose thoroughly rubbed into and goading
him into revealing what a raving lunatic he really has turned into seething with
such bloodlust as to be reduced to uttering schoolyard taunts of Usenet bravado
fisticuffs safely ensconced behind a keyboard.

> What need can it possibly serve?

The flawed premise renders the followup question inconsequential.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 22, 12:18�am, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Stynchie, I just saw your whiney retort to my earlier post. I'm surprised
> you're still afraid of me. I haven't addressed you directly for months now.
>
> More to the point is why you keep posting to RAO. You're the worst excuse for
> a "christian" we've seen here since Marc sent the Krooborg packing, yet you
> keep maintaining your false face of piety.
>
> Why do you seek the punishment you get here? What need can it possibly serve?

Like I've said before, there's a pathology for people who come on the
Internet to anonymously attack others and then fail to disappear when
they've been outsmarted at every turn. Masochism is certainly a
component, but a better analogy is the beaten dog who is still loyal
to his master because at least he's paying attention. When we
acknowledge CISG, he spins and sputters and shouts the same inanities
over and over for a few days like Pavlov's (beaten) dog.

The pathology, of course, is people like him do not have a satisfying
personal life. If you like your job, if you have satisfying
interpersonal relationships and if you have interests and talents,
then you're not running around on the Internet and attacking perfect
strangers. If any of us spent a day in CISG's shoes, I'm sure we would
have nightmares for the rest of our lives.

[GeoSynch]

BaBoon goes bonkers:

> ... CISG ....

Whereas you are a real-life stalker, camping out in front of Arny's house like
that some years ago.

Luckily for him (and you) your mental derangement was still in a nascent state,
your sputtering synapses not yet having fully succumbed to the insidious ravages
of aspartame poisonig, otherwise no telling what criminal atrocities a
psycho-delusional nutjob like Marc Phillips could have been capable of
perpetrating.

(The rest of your post was an automatic lose according to your own idiotic
definition.)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 22, 2:52*am, "GeoSynch" > wrote:

> > More to the point is why you keep posting to RAO.
>
> Cause I darn well feel like it, much to the chagrin of self-appointed petty
> little tyrants like you and the BaBoon, who think and act as if they own the
> joint. What a joke you two are.

Nobody is trying to "shut you down", Sugar.

It was a polite question. Why would somebody want to keep publicly
peeing on themselves?

Here let me answer for you: jism, smegma, etc.

<yawn>

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 23, 1:51�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2:52�am, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > > More to the point is why you keep posting to RAO.
>
> > Cause I darn well feel like it, much to the chagrin of self-appointed petty
> > little tyrants like you and the BaBoon, who think and act as if they own the
> > joint. What a joke you two are.
>
> Nobody is trying to "shut you down", Sugar.
>
> It was a polite question. Why would somebody want to keep publicly
> peeing on themselves?
>
> Here let me answer for you: jism, smegma, etc.
>
> <yawn>

And once again he's posting this crap at 8:30pm on a Saturday night.
What a loser.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon blithered:

> And once again he's posting this crap at 8:30pm on a Saturday night. What a
> loser.

Well, at least you didn't make a complete idiot of yourself regarding time zones
on this one. ;-)