Bratzi puts a fork in RAO

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Nice job, Bratzi.

[Clyde Slick]

On 7 aug., 06:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> Nice job, Bratzi.

yes, RAO died yesterday, ironically 40 years to the day after MM's
death.
Like the death of MM, the death of rao is not a suicide,
but rather a massive coverup to hide the sexual
perversions of the perep, in this case Bratzi!

[hophead]

In article <1332d9e5-acd4-49b9-a4f4-
>,
says...
>
> On 7 aug., 06:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
> > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> yes, RAO died yesterday, ironically 40 years to the day after MM's
> death.
> Like the death of MM, the death of rao is not a suicide,
> but rather a massive coverup to hide the sexual
> perversions of the perep, in this case Bratzi!

I've had Bratzi in my kill file for a long time now so I only know of
his existance through replies (and if I recall correctly, most of his
posts don't garner any). So, I've missed the fun: what did Bratzi do?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 7, 10:17�am, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 7, 3:57�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> �LoL. �Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> astroturfing comments.
>
> http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/06/seiu-and-the-persuasion-of-power/
>
> It has to be an embarrassing day to be democrat when your president
> has called out the thugs to beat down the citizen dissent against his
> BS lying agenda designed to ultimatel for us into single payer health
> care.

Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
unreadable and totally lacking in substance.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
hophead > wrote:

> In article <1332d9e5-acd4-49b9-a4f4-
> >,
> says...
> >
> > On 7 aug., 06:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > > wrote:
> > > Nice job, Bratzi.
> >
> > yes, RAO died yesterday, ironically 40 years to the day after MM's
> > death.
> > Like the death of MM, the death of rao is not a suicide,
> > but rather a massive coverup to hide the sexual
> > perversions of the perep, in this case Bratzi!
>
> I've had Bratzi in my kill file for a long time now so I only know of
> his existance through replies (and if I recall correctly, most of his
> posts don't garner any). So, I've missed the fun: what did Bratzi do?

About two google group pages of cut 'n' paste OT political posts.

Stephen

[hophead]

In article >, smcelroy2
@POPaustin.rr.com says...

> About two google group pages of cut 'n' paste OT political posts.

Hah! Having him kill-filed just got that much sweeter.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 7, 11:14�am, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 7, 10:17�am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 7, 3:57�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > �LoL. �Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> > astroturfing comments.
>
> >http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/06/seiu-and-the-persuasion-of-power/
>
> > It has to be an embarrassing day to be democrat when your president
> > has called out the thugs to beat down the citizen dissent against his
> > BS lying agenda designed to ultimately force us into single payer health
> > care.
>
> > ScottW
>
> Note the corrections. My apologies for confusing the easily confused.

Blaming your poor communications skills on the comprehension skills of
others? Real men are always accountable for their actions.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 7, 1:28*pm, vinyl anachronist >
wrote:
> On Aug 7, 10:17 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > On Aug 7, 3:57 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > LoL. Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> > astroturfing comments.

Mandatory subject change.

> Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
> unreadable and totally lacking in substance.

2pid is jealous. He's been vying for the "Least Relevent Poster" award
for years and now Bratzi has snatched it from him.

Note to 2pid: for me to be a "hypocrite" I would have to post more OT
posts than either you or Bratzi. Here's yet another chance for Google
to "lie" to you. LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 7, 3:04*pm, vinyl anachronist >
wrote:
> On Aug 7, 11:14 am, ScottW2 > wrote:

> > Note the corrections. My apologies for confusing the easily confused.
>
> Blaming your poor communications skills on the comprehension skills of
> others? Real men are always accountable for their actions.

2pid is an expert at projection.

2pid is also very 'brave'. LoL.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 7, 12:56�pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 7, 12:04�pm, vinyl anachronist >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 7, 11:14 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 7, 10:17 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 7, 3:57 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > > > LoL. Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> > > > astroturfing comments.
>
> > > >http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/06/seiu-and-the-persuasion-of-power/
>
> > > > It has to be an embarrassing day to be democrat when your president
> > > > has called out the thugs to beat down the citizen dissent against his
> > > > BS lying agenda designed to ultimately force us into single payer health
> > > > care.
>
> > > > ScottW
>
> > > Note the corrections. My apologies for confusing the easily confused.
>
> > Blaming your poor communications skills on the comprehension skills of
> > others?
>
> Just the challenged few who only live for the snotfest which is what
> you clearly pine for on RAO. �As you should be able to see, no one
> wants to play that game with you anymore.

The only game I see is a couple of Internet trolls making excessive OT
posts about right-wing politics on an audio group, and everyone else
ridiculing them for their consistently sloppy thinking. You'll never
be able to crawl out from under that train wreck in a million years.

>
> There are more interesting things to discuss like the calling out of
> SEIU thugs to town halls which has set American democracy back at
> least 40 years.

Interesting to you. There are plenty of forums that cater to "deep
thinkers" like yourself. Go find them.


> Where's shhhtard to defend our democratic freedoms when we need him?
> Starship trooper, we need you.

Every day you sound crazier. But you're not the only one. The
Republican party has imploded.

>
> Obama has self-destructed with incredible foolishness, calling for
> snitching and now using union goons.

Only on right-wing blogs written by people who think like you. The
majority of Americans see real improvement in the auto industry and
the housing market.

� This is a side of the
> democratic party operation they really don't want revealed, but now
> it's on display for everyone to see.
> It isn't pretty.

It's not really about Democrats or Republicans. You're a very small
thinker.

[Clyde Slick]

On 7 aug., 12:02, hophead > wrote:
> In article <1332d9e5-acd4-49b9-a4f4-
> >,
> says...
>
>
>
> > On 7 aug., 06:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > > wrote:
> > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > yes, RAO died yesterday, ironically 40 years to the day after MM's
> > death.
> > Like the death of MM, the death of rao is not a suicide,
> > but rather a massive coverup to hide the sexual
> > perversions of the perep, in this case Bratzi!
>
> I've had Bratzi in my kill file for a long time now so I only know of
> his existance through replies (and if I recall correctly, most of his
> posts don't garner any). So, I've missed the fun: what did Bratzi do?

About 20 unanswered monlogues in a row

[Clyde Slick]

On 7 aug., 15:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 1:28*pm, vinyl anachronist >
> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 7, 10:17 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 7, 3:57 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > > LoL. Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> > > astroturfing comments.
>
> Mandatory subject change.
>
> > Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
> > unreadable and totally lacking in substance.
>
> 2pid is jealous. He's been vying for the "Least Relevent Poster" award
> for years and now Bratzi has snatched it from him.
>

"At least" Scott usually gets a response from you, whatever that's
worth.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Witless courts another yapdown.

> > Note to 2pid: for me to be a "hypocrite" I would have to post more OT
> > posts than either you or Bratzi.
>
> No, you'd have to post more audio posts. Without someone to whine
> about,
> you and Marc have nothing.

Scooter, serious question: Do you feel more or less respected when torrents of
disdain rain down on you?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 7, 3:44�pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 7, 12:57�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Aug 7, 1:28�pm, vinyl anachronist >
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 7, 10:17 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 7, 3:57 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > > > LoL. Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> > > > astroturfing comments.
>
> > Mandatory subject change.
>
> > > Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
> > > unreadable and totally lacking in substance.
>
> > 2pid is jealous. He's been vying for the "Least Relevent Poster" award
> > for years and now Bratzi has snatched it from him.
>
> > Note to 2pid: for me to be a "hypocrite" I would have to post more OT
> > posts than either you or Bratzi.
>
> No, you'd have to post more audio posts. �Without someone to whine
> about,
> you and Marc have nothing.

That's not an effective argument. Here's why: RAO used to be a place
where many people in the audio industry used to hang out. Objectivists
like Arny pushed them away. Once the place was nearly a ghost town,
you and Bratzi decided to spam the group with OT political posts and
finished RAO off.

Once Arny left, a few old-timers showed up and were curious. You and
Bratzi proved that this place was still unworthy. Just stop spamming
the group, and maybe they'll slowly come back.

[GeoSynch]

BaBoon raved:

> The only game I see is a couple of Internet trolls making excessive OT posts
> about right-wing politics on an audio group, and everyone else ridiculing them
> for their consistently sloppy thinking. You'll never be able to crawl out from
> under that train wreck in a million years.

Unwarranted hostility. Raging paranoia. All signs of aspartame poisoning mental
impairment.

Your obsession with that OSD literature is to try to gain insight into your own
worsening dementia.

"Mental wounds still screaming
Driving me insane
Im going off the rails on a crazy train..."

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 7, 5:31�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> BaBoon raved:
>
> > The only game I see is a couple of Internet trolls making excessive OT posts
> > about right-wing politics on an audio group, and everyone else ridiculing them
> > for their consistently sloppy thinking. You'll never be able to crawl out from
> > under that train wreck in a million years.
>
> Unwarranted hostility. Raging paranoia. All signs of aspartame poisoning mental
> impairment.
>
> Your obsession with that OSD literature is to try to gain insight into your own
> worsening dementia.
>
> "Mental wounds still screaming
> Driving me insane
> Im going off the rails on a crazy train..."

I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO!

[GeoSynch]

The madcap laughs:

>> > The only game I see is a couple of Internet trolls making excessive OT
>> > posts about right-wing politics on an audio group, and everyone else
>> > ridiculing them for their consistently sloppy thinking. You'll never be
>> > able to crawl out from under that train wreck in a million years.

> > Unwarranted hostility. Raging paranoia. All signs of aspartame poisoning
> > mental impairment.

> > Your obsession with that OSD literature is to try to gain insight into your
> > own worsening dementia.

> > "Mental wounds still screaming
> > Driving me insane
> > Im going off the rails on a crazy train..."

> I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO!

You sound cranked up on aspartame-laced diet soda with quite a buzz going ...
but then the inevitable crash and reemergence of the irrationally hostile
paranoiac.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 7, 4:11*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 7 aug., 15:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Aug 7, 1:28*pm, vinyl anachronist >
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 7, 10:17 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 7, 3:57 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > > > LoL. Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> > > > astroturfing comments.
>
> > Mandatory subject change.
>
> > > Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
> > > unreadable and totally lacking in substance.
>
> > 2pid is jealous. He's been vying for the "Least Relevent Poster" award
> > for years and now Bratzi has snatched it from him.
>
> "At least" Scott usually gets a response from you, whatever that's
> worth.

You and 2pid will never guess who I met today. The Commander of one of
our aircraft carriers. I got a personal guided tour.

That was cool. I highly recommend it if you ever get the chance.

Anyway, is your 'point' that, because I rspond to 2pid's nonsense that
I'm as "bad" as he is WRT off-topic posting?

If so, I disagree.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 7, 5:44*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 7, 12:57*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Aug 7, 1:28*pm, vinyl anachronist >
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 7, 10:17 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 7, 3:57 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > > > LoL. Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> > > > astroturfing comments.
>
> > Mandatory subject change.
>
> > > Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
> > > unreadable and totally lacking in substance.
>
> > 2pid is jealous. He's been vying for the "Least Relevent Poster" award
> > for years and now Bratzi has snatched it from him.
>
> > Note to 2pid: for me to be a "hypocrite" I would have to post more OT
> > posts than either you or Bratzi.
>
> No, you'd have to post more audio posts. *Without someone to whine
> about,
> you and Marc have nothing.

Yes, 2pid, I have long admired your ability to stay on-topic and have
also admired your massive amounts of audio-related posts.
LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 7, 2:56*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 7, 12:04*pm, vinyl anachronist >
> wrote:

> > On Aug 7, 11:14 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 7, 10:17 am, ScottW2 > wrote:

> > > Note the corrections. My apologies for confusing the easily confused.
>
> > Blaming your poor communications skills on the comprehension skills of
> > others?
>
> Just the challenged few who only live for the snotfest which is what
> you clearly pine for on RAO. *As you should be able to see, no one
> wants to play that game with you anymore.

So that would be a "Yes, I blame my poor commuication skills on
others".

Bottom line up front, 2pid. That's the Army way. LoL.

<snip irrelevent gibberish>

> Where's shhhtard to defend our democratic freedoms when we need him?
> Starship trooper, we need you.

I was touring a US nuclear-powered aircraft carrier from 1700-2000. It
was more important to me than posting exchanges with a half (or less)
wit.

You should do it sometime, 2pid. I'll bet even an imbecile like you
would enjoy it.

> Obama

We're talking about your stupidity, 2pid, not poltics. Do try to
focus. LoL.

[Clyde Slick]

On 7 aug., 21:31, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 4:11*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 7 aug., 15:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On Aug 7, 1:28*pm, vinyl anachronist >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 7, 10:17 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Aug 7, 3:57 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > > > > LoL. Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> > > > > astroturfing comments.
>
> > > Mandatory subject change.
>
> > > > Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
> > > > unreadable and totally lacking in substance.
>
> > > 2pid is jealous. He's been vying for the "Least Relevent Poster" award
> > > for years and now Bratzi has snatched it from him.
>
> > "At least" Scott usually gets a response from you, whatever that's
> > worth.
>
> You and 2pid will never guess who I met today. The Commander of one of
> our aircraft carriers. I got a personal guided tour.
>

Which carrier?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 7, 6:22�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> The madcap laughs:
>
> >> > The only game I see is a couple of Internet trolls making excessive OT
> >> > posts about right-wing politics on an audio group, and everyone else
> >> > ridiculing them for their consistently sloppy thinking. You'll never be
> >> > able to crawl out from under that train wreck in a million years.
> > > Unwarranted hostility. Raging paranoia. All signs of aspartame poisoning
> > > mental impairment.
> > > Your obsession with that OSD literature is to try to gain insight into your
> > > own worsening dementia.
> > > "Mental wounds still screaming
> > > Driving me insane
> > > Im going off the rails on a crazy train..."
> > I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO!
>
> You sound cranked up on aspartame-laced diet soda with quite a buzz going ...

No,I don't. You're just fantasizing about it.

> but then the inevitable crash and reemergence of the irrationally hostile
> paranoiac.

God, you're a terrible writer.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

vinyl anachronist said:

> > but then the inevitable crash and reemergence of the irrationally hostile
> > paranoiac.
>
> God, you're a terrible writer.

Today I had 3 cups of coffee and a large diet soda. Which is more likely --
that I'll start hallucinating or I'll pretend to be a christian?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 7, 7:37�pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> vinyl anachronist said:
>
> > > but then the inevitable crash and reemergence of the irrationally hostile
> > > paranoiac.
>
> > God, you're a terrible writer.
>
> Today I had 3 cups of coffee and a large diet soda. Which is more likely --
> that I'll start hallucinating or I'll pretend to be a christian?

According to CISG, it takes EXACTLY seven cups a coffee per day to
hallucinate. No more, no less. He needs to maintain these exact
standards in order to stop the voices in his head.

Then again, what's the difference between hallucinating and believing
in a big invisible guy up in the sky?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

vinyl anachronist said:

> > Today I had 3 cups of coffee and a large diet soda. Which is more likely --
> > that I'll start hallucinating or I'll pretend to be a christian?
>
> According to CISG, it takes EXACTLY seven cups a coffee per day to
> hallucinate. No more, no less. He needs to maintain these exact
> standards in order to stop the voices in his head.
>
> Then again, what's the difference between hallucinating and believing
> in a big invisible guy up in the sky?

Scottie hears voices, you know. Does Stynchie hear the same ones?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 7, 8:55*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 7 aug., 21:31, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Aug 7, 4:11*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > On 7 aug., 15:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Aug 7, 1:28*pm, vinyl anachronist >
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Aug 7, 10:17 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Aug 7, 3:57 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> > > > > > LoL. Shhtard is as big hypocrite as Pelosi with her Natzi and
> > > > > > astroturfing comments.
>
> > > > Mandatory subject change.
>
> > > > > Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
> > > > > unreadable and totally lacking in substance.
>
> > > > 2pid is jealous. He's been vying for the "Least Relevent Poster" award
> > > > for years and now Bratzi has snatched it from him.
>
> > > "At least" Scott usually gets a response from you, whatever that's
> > > worth.
>
> > You and 2pid will never guess who I met today. The Commander of one of
> > our aircraft carriers. I got a personal guided tour.
>
> Which carrier?

CVN-69, Dwight D, Eisenhower.

[Bret L]

On Aug 7, 8:55 am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 7 aug., 06:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > Nice job, Bratzi.
>
> yes, RAO died yesterday, ironically 40 years to the day after MM's
> death.


What is 2009 minus 1962?

[Bret L]

>
> > Where's shhhtard to defend our democratic freedoms when we need him?
> > Starship trooper, we need you.
>
> Every day you sound crazier. But you're not the only one. The
> Republican party has imploded.

The old globalist neocon loxist ass kissing GOP of the last 35 years
NEEDS to implode. What is left of the GOP is going to be the
buchanans and the Pausl-men with principles, popular or otherwise. The
GOP will be forced to run a constitutionalist fiscally responsible
person and very probably a pro-manufacturing, anti-environwhackalist,
pro-nationalist America Firster to boot. The neocons and liberals can
stand the **** by when that happens, because the GOP will be forced
into the Sailer Strategy-IGNORE all nonwhites, trendies, feminists,
fruitcakes and whatnot and win with 75% of the white vote. 755 of the
white vote is still a winning combination.
>
>
>
> > Obama has self-destructed with incredible foolishness, calling for
> > snitching and now using union goons.
>
> Only on right-wing blogs written by people who think like you. The
> majority of Americans see real improvement in the auto industry and
> the housing market.

Yes, the Japanese, Korean and German car workers are getting a boost,
as are to a lesser extent the lily-white workforces of Honda, BMW and
other foreign makers in the Southeast.

And let's look at the consequences of "improvements" in the housing
market. The affordability of homes for families is going back down to
zero. The so called "Implosion" was a blessing for a lot of honest
decent people to be able to get into a house at a sane price.

[Bret L]

>
> > > Mandatory subject change.
>
> > > > Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
> > > > unreadable and totally lacking in substance.
>
> > > 2pid is jealous. He's been vying for the "Least Relevent Poster" award
> > > for years and now Bratzi has snatched it from him.
>
> > > Note to 2pid: for me to be a "hypocrite" I would have to post more OT
> > > posts than either you or Bratzi.
>
> > No, you'd have to post more audio posts. Without someone to whine
> > about,
> > you and Marc have nothing.
>
> That's not an effective argument. Here's why: RAO used to be a place
> where many people in the audio industry used to hang out. Objectivists
> like Arny pushed them away. Once the place was nearly a ghost town,
> you and Bratzi decided to spam the group with OT political posts and
> finished RAO off.
>
> Once Arny left, a few old-timers showed up and were curious. You and
> Bratzi proved that this place was still unworthy. Just stop spamming
> the group, and maybe they'll slowly come back.

Horse****. If they want to post they will post. What has killed
r.a.o. is all the forums like Hoffman where the tube rolling ****
eaters and willfully ignorant neurotic fairies and pecker polishers
are protected from a good dose of ridicule because anyone hoisting
their petards gets kicked and banned.

Mind you, I think any "REAL PRO" posting on Usenet, and very
especially on opinion NGs is undermining his own authority. Fighter
pilots don't hang out at small airport bars and Indy car drivers
don't hang out at the local hot rod shop. The elite meet in
exclusive settings. Even on as candyass a forum as some of those
protected ones, you saw some people representing major manufacturers
get run off by guys who weren't rude or ignorant., they just knew more
about the company's product than the pro did and he, quite rightly,
scrammed.

Opinion NGs are where the **** flies and if you can't take it you
leave. That said, those who left weren't bringing much to the table.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 8, 1:04*am, Bret L > wrote:

> *What is 2009 minus 1962?

Bratzi.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 8, 1:23*am, Bret L > wrote:

> *Horse****.

I have a differing POV.

Who wants to wade through you racist crap? Not me.

[Clyde Slick]

On 8 aug., 02:23, Bret L > wrote:

>
> *Mind you, I think any "REAL PRO" posting on Usenet, and very
> especially on opinion NGs is undermining his own authority. *Fighter
> pilots don't hang out at small airport bars and Indy car drivers
> don't *hang out at the local hot rod shop. *The elite meet in
> exclusive *settings. *

Stop brqaging about your special invite to Hitler's bunker.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 7, 11:23�pm, Bret L > wrote:
> > > > Mandatory subject change.
>
> > > > > Wow. That might be your most embarrassing post ever. Pointless,
> > > > > unreadable and totally lacking in substance.
>
> > > > 2pid is jealous. He's been vying for the "Least Relevent Poster" award
> > > > for years and now Bratzi has snatched it from him.
>
> > > > Note to 2pid: for me to be a "hypocrite" I would have to post more OT
> > > > posts than either you or Bratzi.
>
> > > No, you'd have to post more audio posts. Without someone to whine
> > > about,
> > > you and Marc have nothing.
>
> > That's not an effective argument. Here's why: RAO used to be a place
> > where many people in the audio industry used to hang out. Objectivists
> > like Arny pushed them away. Once the place was nearly a ghost town,
> > you and Bratzi decided to spam the group with OT political posts and
> > finished RAO off.
>
> > Once Arny left, a few old-timers showed up and were curious. You and
> > Bratzi proved that this place was still unworthy. Just stop spamming
> > the group, and maybe they'll slowly come back.
>
> �Horse****. If they want to post they will post. �What has killed
> r.a.o. is all the forums like Hoffman where the tube rolling ****
> eaters and willfully ignorant neurotic fairies and �pecker polishers
> are protected from a good dose of ridicule because anyone hoisting
> their petards �gets kicked and banned.

Oh, so you got banned from SH. Figures. You can always go to Stereo
Central, but you have to be relatively funny to survive there.

>
> �Mind you, I think any "REAL PRO" posting on Usenet, and very
> especially on opinion NGs is undermining his own authority. �Fighter
> pilots don't hang out at small airport bars and Indy car drivers
> don't �hang out at the local hot rod shop. �The elite meet in
> exclusive �settings.

This used to be a different place.

�Even on as candyass a forum as some of those
> protected ones, you saw some people representing major manufacturers
> get run off by guys who weren't rude or ignorant., they just knew more
> about the company's product than the pro did and he, quite rightly,
> scrammed.

Nope, I see mostly the opposite. I see people with ****ty systems and
no experience try to express negative opinions on equipment they
simplay can't afford.

>
> �Opinion NGs are where the **** flies and if you can't take it you
> leave. �That said, those who left weren't bringing much to the table.

Bull****. There were many industry people and major players here.
There were equipment manufacturers, reviewers and even a British lord
or two. There were also people who were funny, knew how to write and
exhibit a generous dose of wit. Most of these people were
entertaining. I can't say the same about you. You're not interesting.
You can't carry on a decent conversation. You post like you're
autistic, which means that you simply spout your endless opinions
without encouraging any sort of interaction. That's why most people
ignore you.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 7, 11:52�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 1:04�am, Bret L > wrote:
>
> > �What is 2009 minus 1962?
>
> Bratzi.

I know the answer to that, because I was born the day she died. (True)

In fact, her spirit lives within me. And she has a message for Bratzi:

"Quit jacking off to my photos, you sick Nazi! Eww!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

vinyl anachronist said:

[erstwhile RAO]

> There were many industry people and major players here.

That's true, and aside from having a vested interest in the audio industry,
they all shared one other common trait: Disgust with Arnii Krooger.

> There were equipment manufacturers, reviewers and

We still have some of them.

> even a British lord or two.

<snicker>

Do you recall Pukey's shrieking defense of George III? How about his diehard
allegiance to the "rights" of the foxhunt crowd, even though he had never
participated and never intended to? Stewbie also approved of the Krooborg's
RAO antics because he, too, "knew" that high-end audio is full of ripoffs.

Maybe your point is that the group used to have a more eclectic makeup. I'd
agree with that.

> There were also people who were funny, knew how to write and
> exhibit a generous dose of wit. Most of these people were
> entertaining. I can't say the same about you. You're not interesting.
> You can't carry on a decent conversation. You post like you're
> autistic, which means that you simply spout your endless opinions
> without encouraging any sort of interaction. That's why most people
> ignore you.

Agreed, LOt"S. If Usenet groups had a "FLUSH" lever, Bratzi would have been
washed away ages ago.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 8, 2:15*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 8, 11:21*am, George M. Middius >
> wrote:

> > Agreed, LOt"S. If Usenet groups had a "FLUSH" lever, Bratzi would have been
> > washed away ages ago.
>
> *LoL. *Complete lack of self-awareness noted. *

LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 7, 6:09*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Witless courts another yapdown.
>
> > > Note to 2pid: for me to be a "hypocrite" I would have to post more OT
> > > posts than either you or Bratzi.
>
> > No, you'd have to post more audio posts. *Without someone to whine
> > about,
> > you and Marc have nothing.
>
> Scooter, serious question: Do you feel more or less respected when torrents of
> disdain rain down on you?

2pid self-awareness indicator has been getting progressively worse.

No wonder he doesn't want any improvement in health care. 2pid
realizes that he sucks up more than his fair share of resources. LoL.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > > Agreed, LOt"S. If Usenet groups had a "FLUSH" lever, Bratzi would have been
> > > washed away ages ago.
> >
> > *LoL. *Complete lack of self-awareness noted. *
>
> LoL.

Witless, it's not objectively true that I am universally hated, even though
you might hate me enough for the entire world.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Witless snarls in rage.

> > > > > Agreed, LOt"S. If Usenet groups had a "FLUSH" lever, Bratzi would have been
> > > > > washed away ages ago.
> >
> > > > *LoL. *Complete lack of self-awareness noted. *
> >
> > > LoL.
> >
> > Witless, it's not objectively true that I am universally hated,

> Is that the best you can say for yourself?

When I'm speaking to you, it's better than you deserve.

BTW, I believe you're having another one of your reality-fragging episodes:
inability to follow a simple discussion, inability to contain your unresolved
rage, inability to measure yourself by the standards you demand of others. A
full-blown breakdown can't be far off for you.


--

"Why do you keep morphing the terminology?"

-- Scottie Witlessmongrel, 20 April 2009

[GeoSynch]

Boonie's blazin':

> In fact, her spirit lives within me.

Or so you thought after the fifth cup of coffee.

> And she has a message for Bratzi:

"Did I just hear something?" you blurted after the sixth cup of coffee.

> "Quit jacking off to my photos, you sick Nazi! Eww!

Aha, the seventh and telling cup of coffee was consumed.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 8, 4:51*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2:13*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > Witless snarls in rage.
>
> > > > > > > Agreed, LOt"S. If Usenet groups had a "FLUSH" lever, Bratzi would have been
> > > > > > > washed away ages ago.
>
> > > > > > *LoL. *Complete lack of self-awareness noted. *
>
> > > > > LoL.
>
> > > > Witless, it's not objectively true that I am universally hated,
> > > Is that the best you can say for yourself?
>
> > When I'm speaking to you, it's better than you deserve.
>
> I know, considering that it takes a super-human effort on your
> part to say something worth saying I should feel blessed when
> you manage it.

LoL. Complete lack of self-awareness noted.

LoL.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 2:41�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Boonie's blazin':
>
> > In fact, her spirit lives within me.
>
> Or so you thought after the fifth cup of coffee.
>
> > And she has a message for Bratzi:
>
> "Did I just hear something?" you blurted after the sixth cup of coffee.
>
> > "Quit jacking off to my photos, you sick Nazi! Eww!
>
> Aha, the seventh and telling cup of coffee was consumed.

Aren't you the coffee drinker? I prefer yerba mate and green tea.

This sounds like an elaborate yet desperate IKYABWAI on your part. Why
do you lack any sort of self-awareness?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 12:15�pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 8, 11:21�am, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Agreed, LOt"S. If Usenet groups had a "FLUSH" lever, Bratzi would have been
> > washed away ages ago.
>
> �LoL. �Complete lack of self-awareness noted. �The only people who
> find you amusing are petty childish morons. Anyone worthy of note has
> long passed you over for the useless cretin you are.

Back to the name-calling I see.

The only people who really hate George are the ones who are the
objects of his disdain, which is a fairly childish and petty (albeit
human) conceit.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 2:09�pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Aug 8, 1:34�pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > Shhhh! said:
>
> > > > > Agreed, LOt"S. If Usenet groups had a "FLUSH" lever, Bratzi would have been
> > > > > washed away ages ago.
>
> > > > �LoL. �Complete lack of self-awareness noted. �
>
> > > LoL.
>
> > Witless, it's not objectively true that I am universally hated,
>
> Is that the best you can say for yourself?
> You are not universally hated?
> How pathetic.

Is it your goal to be universally hated? Why else would you spend so
much time in a forum where people line up to poke fun at you?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

What's that $(*% noise?

> > > > Witless, it's not objectively true that I am universally hated,

> > > Is that the best you can say for yourself?

> > When I'm speaking to you, it's better than you deserve.

> I know, considering that YAPYAPYAP it takes WOOFWOOFWOOF!
> part BARKETY-BARKETY-BARK! WOOF! to say something <grrr....>
> you WOOF! BARK! YAPYAP! manage it.

Jeez, Scottiedog, don't you ever do what your people want you to?

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burbled:

>> > In fact, her spirit lives within me.

> > Or so you thought after the fifth cup of coffee.

>> > And she has a message for Bratzi:

> > "Did I just hear something?" you blurted after the sixth cup of coffee.

>> > "Quit jacking off to my photos, you sick Nazi! Eww!

> > Aha, the seventh and telling cup of coffee was consumed.

> Aren't you the coffee drinker?

Ahh, but I stop just short of that freakout fifth cup, let alone the schizoid
sixth, and never reach the psycho seventh cup.

> I prefer yerba mate and green tea.

Well, good for you. BTW, there's only one real tea and that's Earl Grey ...
everything else is just tutti-frutti girly tea.

> This sounds like an elaborate yet desperate IKYABWAI on your part.

You have quite the penchance for overuse of that word "desperate" with your
responses to Scott, Bret and who knows who else. Sounds like you are "desperate"
for attention.

> Why do you lack any sort of self-awareness?

Why are you such a troll?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 3:55�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon burbled:
>
> >> > In fact, her spirit lives within me.
> > > Or so you thought after the fifth cup of coffee.
> >> > And she has a message for Bratzi:
> > > "Did I just hear something?" you blurted after the sixth cup of coffee.
> >> > "Quit jacking off to my photos, you sick Nazi! Eww!
> > > Aha, the seventh and telling cup of coffee was consumed.
> > Aren't you the coffee drinker?
>
> Ahh, but I stop just short of that freakout fifth cup, let alone the schizoid
> sixth, and never reach the psycho seventh cup.

If you read more closely, you would have seen that 7 cups increases
the chance of hallucinations 300%. Therefore 4.5 cups probably
increases hallucinations by a mere 193%. Feel better, whack-job?

>
> > I prefer yerba mate and green tea.
>
> Well, good for you. BTW, there's only one real tea and that's Earl Grey ....
> everything else is just tutti-frutti girly tea.

Earl Grey is a manly tea? ROTFLMAO!

Besides, green tea is high in antoxidants and won't mess up your
cardiovascular system the way 4.5 cups of coffee a day does.

>
> > This sounds like an elaborate yet desperate IKYABWAI on your part.
>
> You have quite the penchance for overuse of that word "desperate" with your
> responses to Scott, Bret and who knows who else. Sounds like you are "desperate"
> for attention.

It's the first word that comes to mind when I see people who spend a
lot of time on the Internet attacking others anonymously. "Pathetic"
also comes to mind, as does "personlaity disorder."

>
> > Why do you lack any sort of self-awareness?
>
> Why are you such a troll?

Because I own you.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burbled:

> ... "personlaity disorder."

;-)

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

vinyl anachronist said:

> > > Why do you lack any sort of self-awareness?
> >
> > Why are you such a troll?
>
> Because I own you.

No, you can't trade him for Scottie. I don't even have clear title to Witless.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burbled:

> > Ahh, but I stop just short of that freakout fifth cup, let alone the
> > schizoid sixth, and never reach the psycho seventh cup.

> If you read more closely, you would have seen that 7 cups increases the chance
> of hallucinations 300%. Therefore 4.5 cups probably increases hallucinations
> by a mere 193%. Feel better, whack-job?

I feel much better knowing what an idiot you are overlooking this revealing
paragraph in that article:

"Co-author Dr Charles Fernyhough, also from Durham University's Psychology
Department, noted 'Our study shows an association between caffeine intake and
hallucination-proneness in students. However, one interpretation may be that
those students who were more prone to hallucinations used caffeine to help cope
with their experiences. More work is needed to establish whether caffeine
consumption, and nutrition in general, has an impact on those kinds of
hallucination that cause distress'."

> > BTW, there's only one real tea and that's Earl Grey ... everything else is
> > just tutti-frutti girly tea.

> Earl Grey is a manly tea? ROTFLMAO!

Are you sure you ain't down on that floor gigglin' like a girl with your
tutti-frutti tea?

> Besides, green tea is high in antoxidants

That may be good for ants; coffee has plenty of antioxidants.

> and won't mess up your cardiovascular system the way 4.5 cups of coffee a day
> does.

Ho-hum. Yeah, sure, whatever, no-credibility spoutin' Buffoon.

That same site appears to be the source of your previous claim that aspartame
has been scientifically studied and deemed safe.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070914183700.htm

But at the end of the third paragraph, it's revealed "It was funded by Ajinomoto
Company Inc., a manufacturer of aspartame."

So, that study has about as much credibility as do you, which is next to none.
Har-dee-har-har.

>> > This sounds like an elaborate yet desperate IKYABWAI on your part.

> > You have quite the penchance for overuse of that word "desperate" with your
> > responses to Scott, Bret and who knows who else. Sounds like you are
> > "desperate" for attention.

> It's the first word that comes to mind when I see people who spend a lot of
> time on the Internet attacking others anonymously. "Pathetic" also comes to
> mind, as does "personlaity disorder."

There you go again, making a complete BaBoon of yourself.

>> > Why do you lack any sort of self-awareness?

> > Why are you such a troll?

> Because I own you.

Squeaked the puny pwned puke whilst admitting being a troll.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 4:58�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon burbled:
>
> > ... "personlaity disorder."
>
> ;-)

How many typos were in your rejected submission to our magazine? :-)

[GeoSynch]

Boonie floats in and out of reality:

>> > ... "personlaity disorder."

> > ;-)

> How many typos were in your rejected submission to our magazine? :-)

I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 5:29�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon burbled:
>
> > > Ahh, but I stop just short of that freakout fifth cup, let alone the
> > > schizoid sixth, and never reach the psycho seventh cup.
> > If you read more closely, you would have seen that 7 cups increases the chance
> > of hallucinations 300%. Therefore 4.5 cups probably increases hallucinations
> > by a mere 193%. Feel better, whack-job?
>
> I feel much better knowing what an idiot you are overlooking this revealing
> paragraph in that article:
>
> "Co-author Dr Charles Fernyhough, also from Durham University's Psychology
> Department, noted 'Our study shows an association between caffeine intake and
> hallucination-proneness in students. However, one interpretation may be that
> those students who were more prone to hallucinations used caffeine to help cope
> with their experiences. More work is needed to establish whether caffeine
> consumption, and nutrition in general, has an impact on those kinds of
> hallucination that cause distress'."

I guess we can compare that to your statements about aspartame, which
was deemed safe by studies in over 90 countries. LoL!

>
> > > BTW, there's only one real tea and that's Earl Grey ... everything else is
> > > just tutti-frutti girly tea.
> > Earl Grey is a manly tea? ROTFLMAO!
>
> Are you sure you ain't down on that floor gigglin' like a girl with your
> tutti-frutti tea?
>
> > Besides, green tea is high in antoxidants
>
> That may be good for ants; coffee has plenty of antioxidants.

And loads of caffeine, which is bad for you heart.

>
> > and won't mess up your cardiovascular system the way 4.5 cups of coffee a day
> > does.
>
> Ho-hum. Yeah, sure, whatever, no-credibility spoutin' Buffoon.

Denial noted.

>
> That same site appears to be the source of your previous claim that aspartame
> has been scientifically studied and deemed safe.http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070914183700.htm
>
> But at the end of the third paragraph, it's revealed "It was funded by Ajinomoto
> Company Inc., a manufacturer of aspartame."
>
> So, that study has about as much credibility as do you, which is next to none.
> Har-dee-har-har.

Wow...you mentioned one out of 90! That's a BIG sample you have there.
There is plenty of conclusive evidence that caffeine is harmful, and
none that aspartame is. That sounds, well...desperate.

>
> >> > This sounds like an elaborate yet desperate IKYABWAI on your part.
> > > You have quite the penchance for overuse of that word "desperate" with your
> > > responses to Scott, Bret and who knows who else. Sounds like you are
> > > "desperate" for attention.
> > It's the first word that comes to mind when I see people who spend a lot of
> > time on the Internet attacking others anonymously. "Pathetic" also comes to
> > mind, as does "personlaity disorder."
>
> There you go again, making a complete BaBoon of yourself.

Non-response noted.
>
> >> > Why do you lack any sort of self-awareness?
> > > Why are you such a troll?
> > Because I own you.
>
> Squeaked the puny pwned puke whilst admitting being a troll.

Pwned? Really? Do you really want everyone to know that you're some
computer geek locked in an IT closet? I mean, I know you I know that,
but now the cat's out of the bag.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 7:08�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Boonie floats in and out of reality:
>
> >> > ... "personlaity disorder."
> > > ;-)
> > How many typos were in your rejected submission to our magazine? �:-)
>
> I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO.

Oh, so you're changing your story now?

BTW, it's 9pm on a Saturday night, and you're arguing with complete
strangers on the Internet.

L-O-S-E-R.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burbled:

>> > How many typos were in your rejected submission to our magazine? ?:-)

> > I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO.

> Oh, so you're changing your story now?

When have I ever claimed or alluded to submitting an article to TONEdeaf Audio?

> BTW, it's 9pm on a Saturday night, and you're arguing with complete strangers
> on the Internet.

I'm on west coast time, not central, which pretty much shoots a hole in your
foolish claim I work for a Christian outfit in Nashville.

> L-O-S-E-R.

Looked in a mirror lately, lonely Saturday night Internet buffoon?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 7:26�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon burbled:
>
> >> > How many typos were in your rejected submission to our magazine? ?:-)
> > > I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO.
> > Oh, so you're changing your story now?
>
> When have I ever claimed or alluded to submitting an article to TONEdeaf Audio?

You didn't admit to it. You just went on one of your famous "see you
in a few months" retreats the last time I asked.

>
> > BTW, it's 9pm on a Saturday night, and you're arguing with complete strangers
> > on the Internet.
>
> I'm on west coast time, not central, which pretty much shoots a hole in your
> foolish claim I work for a Christian outfit in Nashville.

Not according to your headers.

>
> > L-O-S-E-R.
>
> Looked in a mirror lately, lonely Saturday night Internet buffoon?

Yes, I'm looking in the mirror right now as I get ready to go out.
It's only 7:30pm here. ROTFLMAO!

So what are your plans for tonight? World of Warcraft?

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 7:32�pm, vinyl anachronist >
wrote:
> On Aug 8, 7:26 pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > Buffoon burbled:
>
> > >> > How many typos were in your rejected submission to our magazine? ?:-)
> > > > I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO.
> > > Oh, so you're changing your story now?
>
> > When have I ever claimed or alluded to submitting an article to TONEdeaf Audio?
>
> You didn't admit to it. You just went on one of your famous "see you
> in a few months" retreats the last time I asked.
>
>
>
> > > BTW, it's 9pm on a Saturday night, and you're arguing with complete strangers
> > > on the Internet.
>
> > I'm on west coast time, not central, which pretty much shoots a hole in your
> > foolish claim I work for a Christian outfit in Nashville.
>
> Not according to your headers.

Actually, your location has changed and you are on the West Coast. I
guess you got fired after they linked your posts here to their
organization.

Sorry, dude, but you should have stopped talking when I told you to.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burbled:

>> >> > How many typos were in your rejected submission to our magazine? ?:-)

> >> > I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO.

>> > Oh, so you're changing your story now?

> > When have I ever claimed or alluded to submitting an article to TONEdeaf
> > Audio?

> You didn't admit to it. You just went on one of your famous "see you in a few
> months" retreats the last time I asked.

That is an admission you knew your question "How many typos were in your
rejected submission to our magazine?" had no basis in fact before you even asked
it. IOW, no-credibility Buffoon knowingly lied. Why am I not surprised?

>> > BTW, it's 9pm on a Saturday night, and you're arguing with complete
>> > strangers on the Internet.

> > I'm on west coast time, not central, which pretty much shoots a hole in your
> > foolish claim I work for a Christian outfit in Nashville.

> Not according to your headers.

Next thing you know, you're going to trot out that old Arny ploy "Google lied to
me."

>> > L-O-S-E-R.

> > Looked in a mirror lately, lonely Saturday night Internet buffoon?

> Yes, I'm looking in the mirror right now as I get ready to go out. It's only
> 7:30pm here. ROTFLMAO!

Here too, but no mirror on the ceiling and no rolling on the floor either.

> So what are your plans for tonight? World of Warcraft?

Goin' out and have some real fun, instead of virtual fun on rao.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burbled:

>> > I'm on west coast time, not central, which pretty much shoots a hole in
>> > your foolish claim I work for a Christian outfit in Nashville.

> > Not according to your headers.

> Actually, your location has changed and you are on the West Coast. I guess you
> got fired after they linked your posts here to their organization.

Been here all along. If you mistakenly got someone else in trouble, I hope karma
catches up with you for it.

> Sorry, dude, but you should have stopped talking when I told you to.

You're an idiot. And a snitch. And badly mistaken.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 7:46�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon burbled:
>
> >> >> > How many typos were in your rejected submission to our magazine? ?:-)
> > >> > I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO.
> >> > Oh, so you're changing your story now?
> > > When have I ever claimed or alluded to submitting an article to TONEdeaf
> > > Audio?
> > You didn't admit to it. You just went on one of your famous "see you in a few
> > months" retreats the last time I asked.
>
> That is an admission you knew your question "How many typos were in your
> rejected submission to our magazine?" had no basis in fact before you even asked
> it. IOW, no-credibility Buffoon knowingly lied. Why am I not surprised?
>
> >> > BTW, it's 9pm on a Saturday night, and you're arguing with complete
> >> > strangers on the Internet.
> > > I'm on west coast time, not central, which pretty much shoots a hole in your
> > > foolish claim I work for a Christian outfit in Nashville.
> > Not according to your headers.
>
> Next thing you know, you're going to trot out that old Arny ploy "Google lied to
> me."
>
> >> > L-O-S-E-R.
> > > Looked in a mirror lately, lonely Saturday night Internet buffoon?
> > Yes, I'm looking in the mirror right now as I get ready to go out. It's only
> > 7:30pm here. ROTFLMAO!
>
> Here too, but no mirror on the ceiling and no rolling on the floor either..

Whatever that means.

>
> > So what are your plans for tonight? World of Warcraft?
>
> Goin' out and have some real fun, instead of virtual fun on rao.

If you consider checking on automated processes real fun, then have it
at, Tiger! LMAO!

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 8, 7:49�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon burbled:
>
> >> > I'm on west coast time, not central, which pretty much shoots a hole in
> >> > your foolish claim I work for a Christian outfit in Nashville.
> > > Not according to your headers.
> > Actually, your location has changed and you are on the West Coast. I guess you
> > got fired after they linked your posts here to their organization.
>
> Been here all along.

Not according to your headers. The first time we brought this up you
were posting from the Central Time Zone.

By the way, I said Tennessee. YOU said Nashville. That's what a law
enforcement investigator would call a "tell."

If you mistakenly got someone else in trouble, I hope karma
> catches up with you for it.

There is no "someone else," and you know it.

>
> > Sorry, dude, but you should have stopped talking when I told you to.
>
> You're an idiot.

Nope, you obviously still have no idea what I'm talking about. Any
respectable IT guy would. I used to work with hardware installers who
did their job out of a big binder. You're undoubtedly one of those
guys.

> And a snitch.

Snitch? You snitched on yourself, brainchild.

> And badly mistaken.

I seriously doubt it. Every time I bring this up, you freak out.
There's no reason you would call me a snitch unless you did get in
trouble at work. That's another "tell."

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burbled:

> > Been here all along.

> Not according to your headers. The first time we brought this up you were
> posting from the Central Time Zone.

I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO!

> By the way, I said Tennessee. YOU said Nashville. That's what a law
> enforcement investigator would call a "tell."

They'd more credibly "tell" you you're an idiot.

> > If you mistakenly got someone else in trouble, I hope karma catches up with
> > you for it.

> There is no "someone else," and you know it.

There is, but it's proving quixotic trying to convince an idiot like you.

>> > Sorry, dude, but you should have stopped talking when I told you to.

> > You're an idiot.

> Nope,

Yep.

> you obviously still have no idea what I'm talking about.

Nor does anybody else, probably not even you.

> Any respectable IT guy would.

Any respectable IT guy would think you're an idiot.

> I used to work with hardware installers who did their job out of a big binder.

The last gainful employment you held was as a cable gopher.

> You're undoubtedly one of those guys.

Who laughs at idiotic cable gophers. :-)

> > And a snitch.

> Snitch? You snitched on yourself, brainchild.

You've snitched out Arny to his pastor, Bret to his various ISPs on many
occasions, and in your "calvin coolidge" guise tried to snitch me out for
posting a link to a commercially available CD. So, yeah, you're a snitch. And a
hypocritical one at that, the way you kvetched to Scott why you couldn't
understand why others would complain to your employer, colleagues, etc. and try
to get you in trouble with them.

> > And badly mistaken.

> I seriously doubt it. Every time I bring this up, you freak out.

I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO!

> There's no reason you would call me a snitch unless you did get in trouble at
> work. That's another "tell."

You're still an idiot. An incorrigible one at that. ;-)

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 9, 12:47�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon burbled:
>
> > > Been here all along.
> > Not according to your headers. The first time we brought this up you were
> > posting from the Central Time Zone.
>
> I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO!

Non-response noted.

>
> > By the way, I said Tennessee. YOU said Nashville. That's what a law
> > enforcement investigator would call a "tell."
>
> They'd more credibly "tell" you you're an idiot.

Non-response noted.

>
> > > If you mistakenly got someone else in trouble, I hope karma catches up with
> > > you for it.
> > There is no "someone else," and you know it.
>
> There is, but it's proving quixotic trying to convince an idiot like you.

Non-response noted.

>
> >> > Sorry, dude, but you should have stopped talking when I told you to.
> > > You're an idiot.
> > Nope,
>
> Yep.

Mere contradiction in lieu of any evidence noted.

>
> > you obviously still have no idea what I'm talking about.
>
> Nor does anybody else, probably not even you.

Non-response noted.

>
> > Any respectable IT guy would.
>
> Any respectable IT guy would think you're an idiot.

Non-response noted.

>
> > I used to work with hardware installers who did their job out of a big binder.
>
> The last gainful employment you held was as a cable gopher.

When you make up things out of thin air, you lose the argument. Again.

>
> > You're undoubtedly one of those guys.
>
> Who laughs at idiotic cable gophers. :-)

So you are one of those guys. I guess it hurts to know that idiotic
cable gophers make more money than IT guys like yourself. I had cable
technicians working for me that made $85K a year. Let's see your tax
return.

>
> > > And a snitch.
> > Snitch? You snitched on yourself, brainchild.
>
> You've snitched out Arny to his pastor,

No, Arny snitched me out to a magazine editor and threatened to press
nonsensical charges against me. I contacted his wife and pastor to
make him stop trying to take food out of the mouths of my family. It
worked, didn't it.

Basically, if you mess with me, I'll respond in kind. Tell me how
that's "snitching."

Bret to his various ISPs on many
> occasions,

Never happened. I always thought it was amusing that Bret was
constantly getting in trouble with his ISPs and mentioned it here,
that's all.

> and in your "calvin coolidge" guise tried to snitch me out for
> posting a link to a commercially available CD.

I don't even know what you're talking about there.

> So, yeah, you're a snitch.

Nope, sorry. You're wrong.

And a
> hypocritical one at that, the way you kvetched to Scott why you couldn't
> understand why others would complain to your employer, colleagues, etc. and try
> to get you in trouble with them.

Scott has always felt strongly about taking things out into the real
world. We've discussed it in person.

>
> > > And badly mistaken.
> > I seriously doubt it. Every time I bring this up, you freak out.
>
> I think you're hallucinating again. ROTFLMAO!

Non-response noted.

>
> > There's no reason you would call me a snitch unless you did get in trouble at
> > work. That's another "tell."
>
> You're still an idiot. An incorrigible one at that. ;-)

Non-response noted. See...I own you!

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon burbled:

> > The last gainful employment you held was as a cable gopher.

> When you make up things out of thin air, you lose the argument. Again.

I guess your olfactory senses have become so blunted, you no longer reek
yourself right out of the room with the stench of your own hypocrisy. The
overwhelming majority of speculations you've made about me arose "out of thin
air" so by your own idiotic definition you automatically lost all those previous
arguments. Sheesh, what a loser you've turned into.

>> > You're undoubtedly one of those guys.

> > Who laughs at idiotic cable gophers. :-)

> So you are one of those guys. I guess it hurts to know that idiotic cable
> gophers make more money than IT guys like yourself.

Not true. Not me, anyways. Maybe those poor schlubs who man the Help Desk.

> I had cable technicians working for me that made $85K a year.

Forty bucks an hour, not too shabby for unskilled dolts like you. Contract
database programming jobs used to be plentiful at 75 to 100 bucks an hour.,
which would be two to two-and-a-half times more than cable gophers.

> Let's see your tax return.

Yeah, sure, right away.

> >> > And a snitch.

> > and in your "calvin coolidge" guise tried to snitch me out for posting a
> > link to a commercially available CD.

> I don't even know what you're talking about there.

Yes, you do. You've already copped to being "calvin coolidge" so you remember
bragging about snitching to my ISP, unless, of course, you're hallucinating once
again, which you probably are.

> > So, yeah, you're a snitch.

> Nope, sorry. You're wrong.

Sorry, but I'm not wrong about you being a rat fink snitch.

> > You're still an idiot. An incorrigible one at that. ;-)

> Non-response noted. See...I own you!

Still hallucinating?

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon blubbered:

>Hmmm...let's look at the facts.

Yeah, you just got demolished, as evinced by your tepid responses.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 9, 5:10�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon blubbered:
>
> >Hmmm...let's look at the facts.
>
> Yeah, you just got demolished, as evinced by your tepid responses.

That's quite a fantasy. But it's hard to get too excited by someone
who makes up crap out of thin air and then resorts to name-calling
when it doesn't work. Do you really expect me to make a huge effort to
combat an inferior intellect? In all honesty and sincerity, you're not
interesting enough to garner anything more than a tepid response.
That's why everyone ignores you. Shhh! and I play with you because
it's fun, but even we get quickly bored. You used the same tired
strategies over and over, which clearly illustrates your lack of
imagination and cleverness.

Sorry to tell you all of this, but you and I both know it's true. And
I can prove it:

1. Name one person here other than yourself who thinks you get the
best of any of us.

2. Name one person in your real life who has seen your posts here and
thinks that you're "really showing us."

You're an anonymous Internet troll. Your kind are truly dinosaurs. It
might have been cool to attack people on the Internet in 1996, but now
it's sad...and pathological. A lot of books are being written about
people JUST LIKE YOU. None of them are congratulatory in nature.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon blubbered:

>> >Hmmm...let's look at the facts.

> > Yeah, you just got demolished, as evinced by your tepid responses.

> That's quite a

nice concession speech you just made there using ever last bromide in your
tattered bag of tricks.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 9, 7:43�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon blubbered:
>
> >> >Hmmm...let's look at the facts.
> > > Yeah, you just got demolished, as evinced by your tepid responses.
> > That's quite a
>
> nice concession speech you just made there using ever last bromide in your
> tattered bag of tricks.

Last word freak, eh?

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon blabbered:

>> >> >Hmmm...let's look at the facts.

> >> > Yeah, you just got demolished, as evinced by your tepid responses.

>> > That's quite a

> > nice concession speech you just made there using ever[y] last bromide in
> > your tattered bag of tricks.

> Last word freak, eh?

Just to correct a small typo. ;-)

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 9, 8:31�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon blabbered:
>
> >> >> >Hmmm...let's look at the facts.
> > >> > Yeah, you just got demolished, as evinced by your tepid responses.
> >> > That's quite a
> > > nice concession speech you just made there using ever[y] last bromide in
> > > your tattered bag of tricks.
> > Last word freak, eh?
>
> Just to correct a small typo. ;-)

Didn't make it any more correct, loser.

[GeoSynch]

Buffoon blabbered:

>> > Last word freak, eh?

> > Just to correct a small typo. ;-)

> Didn't make it any more correct, loser.

Yeah, sure, whatever, no-credibility spoutin' Buffoon.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 9, 8:59�pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
> Buffoon blabbered:
>
> >> > Last word freak, eh?
> > > Just to correct a small typo. ;-)
> > Didn't make it any more correct, loser.
>
> Yeah, sure, whatever, no-credibility spoutin' Buffoon.

Oh, good one!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 9, 11:44*pm, vinyl anachronist >
wrote:
> On Aug 9, 8:59 pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > Buffoon blabbered:
>
> > >> > Last word freak, eh?
> > > > Just to correct a small typo. ;-)
> > > Didn't make it any more correct, loser.
>
> > Yeah, sure, whatever, no-credibility spoutin' Buffoon.
>
> Oh, good one!

Give Sugar the last word.

He's boring beyond belief.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 9, 9:47�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 9, 11:44�pm, vinyl anachronist >
> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 9, 8:59 pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > > Buffoon blabbered:
>
> > > >> > Last word freak, eh?
> > > > > Just to correct a small typo. ;-)
> > > > Didn't make it any more correct, loser.
>
> > > Yeah, sure, whatever, no-credibility spoutin' Buffoon.
>
> > Oh, good one!
>
> Give Sugar the last word.
>
> He's boring beyond belief.

If you and I ignore him, he'll cease to exist.

Done!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 10, 10:39*am, vinyl anachronist >
wrote:
> On Aug 9, 9:47 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Aug 9, 11:44 pm, vinyl anachronist >
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 9, 8:59 pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > > > Buffoon blabbered:
>
> > > > >> > Last word freak, eh?
> > > > > > Just to correct a small typo. ;-)
> > > > > Didn't make it any more correct, loser.
>
> > > > Yeah, sure, whatever, no-credibility spoutin' Buffoon.
>
> > > Oh, good one!
>
> > Give Sugar the last word.
>
> > He's boring beyond belief.
>
> If you and I ignore him, he'll cease to exist.
>
> Done!

Aside from one brief poke yesterday I've ignored him for weeks.

He makes me sleepy.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Aug 10, 8:51�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Aug 10, 10:39�am, vinyl anachronist >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 9, 9:47 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On Aug 9, 11:44 pm, vinyl anachronist >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 9, 8:59 pm, "GeoSynch" > wrote:
>
> > > > > Buffoon blabbered:
>
> > > > > >> > Last word freak, eh?
> > > > > > > Just to correct a small typo. ;-)
> > > > > > Didn't make it any more correct, loser.
>
> > > > > Yeah, sure, whatever, no-credibility spoutin' Buffoon.
>
> > > > Oh, good one!
>
> > > Give Sugar the last word.
>
> > > He's boring beyond belief.
>
> > If you and I ignore him, he'll cease to exist.
>
> > Done!
>
> Aside from one brief poke yesterday I've ignored him for weeks.
>
> He makes me sleepy.

Well, I do like to constantly remind him that he's not smart enough or
clever enough to be here. But after months of hearing his same tired
old schtick, I have to conclude that he's not smart enough or clever
enough to know just how dumb he looks when he posts.