Finally an appointee Scott can agree with

[Clyde Slick]

http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103707

http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2009/07/shocker_obamas.php

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 14, 12:41*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Jul 14, 5:38*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> >http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
>
> >http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103707
>
> >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2009/07/shocker_obamas.php
>
> "if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the
> society."
>
> *I think I'd prefer government mandated population controls over the
> probable alternative of rationing, food riots, and famine. *YMMV.
>
> ScottW

you prefer that the government ration babies
rather than ration food.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 14, 4:54*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Jul 14, 12:47*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 12:41*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 14, 5:38*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > >http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
>
> > > >http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103707
>
> > > >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2009/07/shocker_obamas.php
>
> > > "if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the
> > > society."
>
> > > *I think I'd prefer government mandated population controls over the
> > > probable alternative of rationing, food riots, and famine. *YMMV.
>
> > > ScottW
>
> > you prefer that the government ration babies
> > rather than ration food.
>
> *Absolutely. *Starving babies is not my idea of good government.
>
> ScottW

Nor is sterilizing adults my idea of good government.
And in your case, it is not the government who is starving
the babies, anyway.
Yet your government would sterilize adults

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 14, 11:09*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Jul 14, 5:00*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 4:54*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 14, 12:47*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 14, 12:41*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 14, 5:38*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > >http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
>
> > > > > >http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103707
>
> > > > > >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2009/07/shocker_obamas.php
>
> > > > > "if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the
> > > > > society."
>
> > > > > *I think I'd prefer government mandated population controls over the
> > > > > probable alternative of rationing, food riots, and famine. *YMMV.
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > you prefer that the government ration babies
> > > > rather than ration food.
>
> > > *Absolutely. *Starving babies is not my idea of good government.
>
> > > ScottW
>
> > Nor is sterilizing adults my idea of good government.
>
> So ""if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger
> the
> society", what would you suggest?
>
> > And in your case, it is not the government who is starving
> > the babies, anyway.
>
> * Anyway? *So let them starve? *Restore a little natural selection to
> humanity?
>


or impose unnatural selection?



> > Yet your government would sterilize adults-
>
> *A small price to pay IMO. *What would you suggest? Abstain? LoL.
>

swallow, don't spit.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 15, 3:21*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Jul 15, 12:05*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 11:09*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 14, 5:00*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 14, 4:54*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 14, 12:47*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 14, 12:41*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 14, 5:38*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
>
> > > > > > > >http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103707
>
> > > > > > > >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2009/07/shocker_obamas.php
>
> > > > > > > "if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the
> > > > > > > society."
>
> > > > > > > *I think I'd prefer government mandated population controls over the
> > > > > > > probable alternative of rationing, food riots, and famine. *YMMV.
>
> > > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > > you prefer that the government ration babies
> > > > > > rather than ration food.
>
> > > > > *Absolutely. *Starving babies is not my idea of good government.

[Bret L]

On Jul 15, 2:05*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On Jul 14, 11:09*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 5:00*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 14, 4:54*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 14, 12:47*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 14, 12:41*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 14, 5:38*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > > >http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
>
> > > > > > >http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103707
>
> > > > > > >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2009/07/shocker_obamas.php
>
> > > > > > "if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the
> > > > > > society."
>
> > > > > > *I think I'd prefer government mandated population controls over the
> > > > > > probable alternative of rationing, food riots, and famine. *YMMV.
>
> > > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > > you prefer that the government ration babies
> > > > > rather than ration food.
>
> > > > *Absolutely. *Starving babies is not my idea of good government..
>
> > > > ScottW
>
> > > Nor is sterilizing adults my idea of good government.
>
> > So ""if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger
> > the
> > society", what would you suggest?
>
> > > And in your case, it is not the government who is starving
> > > the babies, anyway.
>
> > * Anyway? *So let them starve? *Restore a little natural selection to
> > humanity?
>
> or impose unnatural selection?
>
> > > Yet your government would sterilize adults-
>
> > *A small price to pay IMO. *What would you suggest? Abstain? LoL.
>
> swallow, don't spit.

You hand Stephen MiNE 109 have been on the rag now for a long time.
Better go get checked out.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 14, 10:09*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Jul 14, 5:00*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 4:54*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 14, 12:47*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 14, 12:41*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 14, 5:38*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > > > > >http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
>
> > > > > >http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103707
>
> > > > > >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2009/07/shocker_obamas.php
>
> > > > > "if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the
> > > > > society."
>
> > > > > *I think I'd prefer government mandated population controls over the
> > > > > probable alternative of rationing, food riots, and famine. *YMMV.
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > you prefer that the government ration babies
> > > > rather than ration food.
>
> > > *Absolutely. *Starving babies is not my idea of good government.
>
> > > ScottW
>
> > Nor is sterilizing adults my idea of good government.
>
> So ""if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger
> the
> society", what would you suggest?
>
> > And in your case, it is not the government who is starving
> > the babies, anyway.
>
> * Anyway? *So let them starve? *Restore a little natural selection to
> humanity?
>
> > Yet your government would sterilize adults-
>
> *A small price to pay IMO. *What would you suggest? Abstain? LoL.

I think China does this.

Thanks for your admission that you're a communist and that you fully
support Chinese population policies.