Re: NAT: A different response

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > dogma: only "the military" are capable of releasing human rights from
> > captivity
> >
> > prejudice: Gays have some secret disability known only to "the military"
> >
> > irrational bias: I admit you didn't state this here, but in the past you
> > have fatuously claimed that since marriage has always been a hetero
> > institution, it should always remain so. I presumed that a similar bias
> > underlay your current weaseling about the sanctity of the Most High Secret
> > Military Lore (i.e. "the military" has always had a policy of not
> > tolerating Gays, so that state of affairs should continue).
>
> As I said, prepare for the old saw "unit cohesion".
> I think Clyde is prepping the battlefield for its introduction.

One characteristic Sacky shares with Witlessmongrel is painfully low
self-awareness. For example, Sacky has dug in his heels at every turn when
Gay people demand equal rights. His excuses are pathetically weak ("it's
always been that way" or "the military are special"), so it's obvious he's
motivated by hatred. And yet he denies his hatred, just as he denies being
stupid or drunk. Sacky seems incapable of understanding that his attitudes
do bespeak hatred. If the controversy over serving in the armed forces
turned on Jews vs. Gentiles, you know he'd be advocating courts-martial
for "the nazis".

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 8, 12:58*am, George M. Middius >
wrote:

> If the controversy over serving in the armed forces
> turned on Jews vs. Gentiles, you know he'd be advocating courts-martial
> for "the nazis".

Now there's an idea. Let's just make it so that Jews can only serve in
finance battalions. (That's not a stereotype. It's scientific fact
that all Jews are good with money.)

If Jews were in combat units, unit cohesion and readiness might
suffer. Plus there'd be a lot of whining. Jews whine a lot. Who wants
to share a fighting position with a whiner?

I'm not adding any irrational bias or prejudice. I truly think Jews
should be allowed to openly serve if the military thinks it's a good
idea.

[[email protected]]

On Jun 8, 1:58*am, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > dogma: only "the military" are capable of releasing human rights from
> > > captivity
>
> > > prejudice: Gays have some secret disability known only to "the military"
>
> > > irrational bias: I admit you didn't state this here, but in the past you
> > > have fatuously claimed that since marriage has always been a hetero
> > > institution, it should always remain so. I presumed that a similar bias
> > > underlay your current weaseling about the sanctity of the Most High Secret
> > > Military Lore (i.e. "the military" has always had a policy of not
> > > tolerating Gays, so that state of affairs should continue).
>
> > As I said, prepare for the old saw "unit cohesion".
> > I think Clyde is prepping the battlefield for its introduction.
>
> One characteristic Sacky shares with Witlessmongrel is painfully low
> self-awareness. For example, Sacky has dug in his heels at every turn when
> Gay people demand equal rights. His excuses are pathetically weak ("it's
> always been that way" or "the military are special"), so it's obvious he's
> motivated by hatred. And yet he denies his hatred, just as he denies being
> stupid or drunk. Sacky seems incapable of understanding that his attitudes
> do bespeak hatred. If the controversy over serving in the armed forces
> turned on Jews vs. Gentiles, you know he'd be advocating courts-martial
> for "the nazis".

My ambivalence about gays serving in the military really bothers you.
Anything less than loudly banging on the drum annoys you.
I told you, but you won't listen. Its up to the brass and the Prez.
I really don't care, I am not out in the street waving banners
for one side or the other.

[[email protected]]

On Jun 8, 3:04*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 12:58*am, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
> > If the controversy over serving in the armed forces
> > turned on Jews vs. Gentiles, you know he'd be advocating courts-martial
> > for "the nazis".
>
> Now there's an idea. Let's just make it so that Jews can only serve in
> finance battalions. (That's not a stereotype. It's scientific fact
> that all Jews are good with money.)
>
> If Jews were in combat units, unit cohesion and readiness might
> suffer. Plus there'd be a lot of whining. Jews whine a lot. Who wants
> to share a fighting position with a whiner?
>
> I'm not adding any irrational bias or prejudice. I truly think Jews
> should be allowed to openly serve if the military thinks it's a good
> idea.

yawn