duh-Scottie runs aground

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Judge Sotomayor (that's the complete name of Pres. Obama's nominee for the
Supreme Court, Witless) said that some opinions are worth more than
others. If she is confirmed, that statement will threaten to shatter the
bedrock of Scottie Witlessmongrel's "equality of differing POV's" mantra.

Of course, Witless believes the government has the right to withhold civil
rights based on arbitrary prejudices. I'm sure that belief comes into
stark conflict with his "every yapping mouth is equal" belief.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 28, 3:11*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Judge Sotomayor (that's the complete name of Pres. Obama's nominee for the
> Supreme Court, Witless) said that some opinions are worth more than
> others. If she is confirmed, that statement will threaten to shatter the
> bedrock of Scottie Witlessmongrel's "equality of differing POV's" mantra.
>
> Of course, Witless believes the government has the right to withhold civil
> rights based on arbitrary prejudices. I'm sure that belief comes into
> stark conflict with his "every yapping mouth is equal" belief.

I wonder how 2pid will feel when his children are forcibly sterilized
in order to raise the IQ mean in the US.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 28, 3:31*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On May 28, 1:11*pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
> > Judge Sotomayor (that's the complete name of Pres. Obama's nominee for the
> > Supreme Court, Witless) said that some opinions are worth more than
> > others. If she is confirmed, that statement will threaten to shatter the
> > bedrock of Scottie Witlessmongrel's "equality of differing POV's" mantra.
>
> > Of course, Witless believes the government has the right to withhold civil
> > rights based on arbitrary prejudices.
>
> *Actually, I believe it's up to the people to define civil rights and
> then the government to protect them.
>
> *For example, you humping a rent-boy in the local park restroom is not
> and hopefully never will be your civil right.

Do you have a "right" to procreate if you so choose, 2pid?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > > Judge Sotomayor (that's the complete name of Pres. Obama's nominee for the
> > > Supreme Court, Witless) said that some opinions are worth more than
> > > others. If she is confirmed, that statement will threaten to shatter the
> > > bedrock of Scottie Witlessmongrel's "equality of differing POV's" mantra.
> >
> > > Of course, Witless believes the government has the right to withhold civil
> > > rights based on arbitrary prejudices.
> >
> > *Actually, I believe it's up to the people to define civil rights and
> > then the government to protect them.
> >
> > *For example, you humping a rent-boy in the local park restroom is not
> > and hopefully never will be your civil right.
>
> Do you have a "right" to procreate if you so choose, 2pid?

Scottie believes folks like him should only be allowed to molest little
girls. The one time he tried moving on a little boy, La Mujer Puta tried
to cut off his peepee.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 28, 5:03*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Shhhh! said:

> > Do you have a "right" to procreate if you so choose, 2pid?
>
> Scottie believes folks like him should only be allowed to molest little
> girls. The one time he tried moving on a little boy, La Mujer Puta tried
> to cut off his peepee.

Your upholstery demands vindication.

[[email protected]]

On 28 Mai, 16:31, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On May 28, 1:11*pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
> > Judge Sotomayor (that's the complete name of Pres. Obama's nominee for the
> > Supreme Court, Witless) said that some opinions are worth more than
> > others. If she is confirmed, that statement will threaten to shatter the
> > bedrock of Scottie Witlessmongrel's "equality of differing POV's" mantra.
>
> > Of course, Witless believes the government has the right to withhold civil
> > rights based on arbitrary prejudices.
>
> *Actually, I believe it's up to the people to define civil rights and
> then the government to protect them.
>
> *For example, you humping a rent-boy in the local park restroom is not
> and hopefully never will be your civil right.
>
> ScottW

Its ok as long as he uses the men's room.