Scottie's conundrum

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Don't you hate those $(*% "tax and spend" liberals? They're so much worse
than the blessed "borrow and spend" ****uplicans.

But wait... Obama, like Clinton and other Democratic Presidents before
him, only wants to raise taxes on the wealthy. Why is that so repugnant to
blue-collar trailer trash? Or even to white-collar drones who got lucky on
stock options once in their lives?

It's a mystery. Maybe Scottie can 'explain' it.

[[email protected]]

On May 26, 9:17 pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Don't you hate those $(*% "tax and spend" liberals? They're so much worse
> than the blessed "borrow and spend" ****uplicans.
>
> But wait... Obama, like Clinton and other Democratic Presidents before
> him, only wants to raise taxes on the wealthy. Why is that so repugnant to
> blue-collar trailer trash? Or even to white-collar drones who got lucky on
> stock options once in their lives?
>
> It's a mystery. Maybe Scottie can 'explain' it.

Bro O'Boogie has NO intention of raising or even seriously attempting
to collect taxes on the TRULY wealthy, those with over $500 million in
wealth. Those people effectively don't pay taxes and they haven't
since the days of Teddy Roosevelt.

The people he is trying to really gouge are the people with $500K to
$10M in wealth. That's who has all the money, and that's who
represents a threat to the superwealthy.

Obama is a tool. The real powers are people like David Axelrod and
Rolm Emmanuel.

Neither the Dems nor the GOP represent the productive wealth nor the
real "working class".

Of course, the US will not be able to support European levels of
social spending, even the Europeans can't do that any more. Total
collapse wil come, the sooner the better, so we can get a racial
nationalist message to the people who today are too comfortable to
listen to it.

Tomorrow belongs to us-because of YOU. That's the delicious part.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
wrote:


> Bro O'Boogie

Nah, you're not a racist. No way.

[[email protected]]

On 26 Mai, 23:29, wrote:


> so we can get a racial
> nationalist message to the people who today are too comfortable to
> listen to it.
>
> *To

You better concentrate on procreating
You are being out ****ed

[[email protected]]

On May 26, 10:39 pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> wrote:
> > Bro O'Boogie
>
> Nah, you're not a racist. No way.

I didn't mean it in a hateful sense any more than Obama's comments on
Michael Steele were. I mean, I was actually inclined to like the guy.
His decisions have let me down in a big way, though.

[[email protected]]

On May 26, 11:09 pm, wrote:
> On 26 Mai, 23:29, wrote:
>
> > so we can get a racial
> > nationalist message to the people who today are too comfortable to
> > listen to it.
>
> > To
>
> You better concentrate on procreating
> You are being out ****ed


Mel Gibson is doing enough sperminating for the both of us.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

I notice you replied to my post, Witless. I didn't read it because as
usual, you left in a whole bunch of quoted stuff from others that was
off-point.

I feel like pointing out that my observation wasn't really about politics.
It was about how stupid you are.


--

" It ended up with a [George-]sized anal orifice.
I got out after getting slammed from the rear."
-- Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO May 16, 2009