The trVth about duh-Scottie and everything political

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Scottie Witlessmongrel is entirely witless. He can't possibly understand
what the discussions are about. If you doubt that, just look at how he
'supports' his 'opinions': He posts links to pages that usually undercut
what he espouses. Furthermore, as even Sacky now admits, duh-Scottie's
links are random or ill-chosen. The evidence clearly shows that Witless
hasn't understood (or even tried, most likely) what's said on the pages he
refers us to.

How many times have various RAOers tried to reason with the Witless One,
only to run aground on the emptiness of his 'mind'? Yes, Jenn, I'm talking
to you. I believe even Stephen recently saw the light (finally), accepting
that it's impossible to overcome Yapper's obdurate stupidity with facts,
logic, or simple common sense.

You can't get Scottie to admit he's wrong. You can't even get him to
acknowledge the point you're making. Scottie Witlessmongrel does not want
to learn anything. He just wants to vent his unfocused anger.



--

"I prefer substantive discussion over continuous expressions of unjustified outrage."
Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, March 24, 2009

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 21, 11:34*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:

> You can't get Scottie to admit he's wrong. You can't even get him to
> acknowledge the point you're making. Scottie Witlessmongrel does not want
> to learn anything. He just wants to vent his unfocused anger.

It's better that he does so here rather than at home. We may wince and
get annoyed at 2pid's stupidity when 2pid tries to 'prove' something
but it may save his wife or kids from bruises or other injuries.

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On May 21, 11:34*pm, George M. Middius >
> wrote:
>
> > You can't get Scottie to admit he's wrong. You can't even get him to
> > acknowledge the point you're making. Scottie Witlessmongrel does not want
> > to learn anything. He just wants to vent his unfocused anger.
>
> It's better that he does so here rather than at home. We may wince and
> get annoyed at 2pid's stupidity when 2pid tries to 'prove' something
> but it may save his wife or kids from bruises or other injuries.

Usenet is full of abandoned groups. Let him go pontificate on
alt.last-man-standing or whatever.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 22, 7:05*am, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
>
> > On May 21, 11:34*pm, George M. Middius >
> > wrote:
>
> > > You can't get Scottie to admit he's wrong. You can't even get him to
> > > acknowledge the point you're making. Scottie Witlessmongrel does not want
> > > to learn anything. He just wants to vent his unfocused anger.
>
> > It's better that he does so here rather than at home. We may wince and
> > get annoyed at 2pid's stupidity when 2pid tries to 'prove' something
> > but it may save his wife or kids from bruises or other injuries.
>
> Usenet is full of abandoned groups. Let him go pontificate on
> alt.last-man-standing or whatever.

Is "pontificate" synonymous with "share the 'clear' and 'obvious'
'truth' filled with 'vision', 'understanding', 'subtlety',
'knowledge', 'honesty' and 'integrity'"?

Or is it more akin to "angry blustering"?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Yapper yapped, ever so childishly:

> > > > You can't get Scottie to admit he's wrong. You can't even get him to
> > > > acknowledge the point you're making. Scottie Witlessmongrel does not want
> > > > to learn anything. He just wants to vent his unfocused anger.
> >
> > > It's better that he does so here rather than at home. We may wince and
> > > get annoyed at 2pid's stupidity when 2pid tries to 'prove' something
> > > but it may save his wife or kids from bruises or other injuries.
> >
> > Usenet is full of abandoned groups. Let him go pontificate on
> > alt.last-man-standing or whatever.
>
> What would you post if you didn't have me to make your petty little
> childish rants about?

You call that a rant? Are you retarded? (rhetorical question)


--

"I prefer substantive discussion over continuous expressions of unjustified outrage."
Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, March 24, 2009

[[email protected]]

On 22 Mai, 15:28, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On May 22, 5:05*am, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
> > *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:
>
> > > On May 21, 11:34*pm, George M. Middius >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > You can't get Scottie to admit he's wrong. You can't even get him to
> > > > acknowledge the point you're making. Scottie Witlessmongrel does not want
> > > > to learn anything. He just wants to vent his unfocused anger.
>
> > > It's better that he does so here rather than at home. We may wince and
> > > get annoyed at 2pid's stupidity when 2pid tries to 'prove' something
> > > but it may save his wife or kids from bruises or other injuries.
>
> > Usenet is full of abandoned groups. Let him go pontificate on
> > alt.last-man-standing or whatever.
>
> *What would you post if you didn't have me to make your petty little
> childish rants about? *Not much according to the evidence.
> In fact, the last time I was off for awhile you petty children
> pontificated quite often about me. *Why?
> The answer is obvious. *Without someone to whine about, you've got
> very little.
>
> Maybe Jenn can fill the void with Olbermann quotes or better yet
> O'Reilly quotes.
> "Did you see....?" * LoL.
> You can all go into your birds of a feather chicken dance together.
>
> ScottW-


i see some misplaced pride.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Yapper yapped, ever so childishly:
>
> > > > > You can't get Scottie to admit he's wrong. You can't even get him to
> > > > > acknowledge the point you're making. Scottie Witlessmongrel does not
> > > > > want
> > > > > to learn anything. He just wants to vent his unfocused anger.
> > >
> > > > It's better that he does so here rather than at home. We may wince and
> > > > get annoyed at 2pid's stupidity when 2pid tries to 'prove' something
> > > > but it may save his wife or kids from bruises or other injuries.
> > >
> > > Usenet is full of abandoned groups. Let him go pontificate on
> > > alt.last-man-standing or whatever.
> >
> > What would you post if you didn't have me to make your petty little
> > childish rants about?
>
> You call that a rant? Are you retarded? (rhetorical question)

His ranter is attached to his BS Detector, also broken.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 23, 10:00*am, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On May 22, 5:04*pm, wrote:

> > i see some misplaced pride.
>
> What you see is my misplaced expectations of a higher level of
> discourse.

LoL. Another one for the 2pidarchive.