Yet Another Question for Scottie Witlessmongrel

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Do you award yourself a "debating trade" point every time a Normal
disparages your 'thinking' or your 'intelligence'?


--
" Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
As I said, the trick is to know what is known."

Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008

[[email protected]]

On 17 Mai, 19:09, George M. Middius > wrote:


>
> --
> " * * * Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
> *As I said, the trick is to know what is known."
>
> * * * * Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008

LOL!

maybe the trick is to know what is NOT known.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 17, 6:09*pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Do you award yourself a "debating trade" point every time a Normal
> disparages your 'thinking' or your 'intelligence'?
>
> --
> " * * * Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
> *As I said, the trick is to know what is known."
>
> * * * * Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008

Was this gem from when 2pid was trying to explain the 'possibility' of
the Red Sea parting in the Bible?

[[email protected]]

On 18 Mai, 12:30, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On May 17, 6:32*pm, wrote:
>
> > On 17 Mai, 19:09, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > --
> > > " * * * Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
> > > *As I said, the trick is to know what is known."
>
> > > * * * * Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008
>
> > LOL!
>
> > maybe the trick is to know what is NOT known.
>
> *If you know it, then we can be assured it is not, not known.
>

False.
You can know that something is unknown.
example: What happens to your soul after you die?
I know that I don't know that

[[email protected]]

On 18 Mai, 13:33, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On May 18, 9:44*am, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18 Mai, 12:30, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On May 17, 6:32*pm, wrote:
>
> > > > On 17 Mai, 19:09, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > " * * * Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
> > > > > *As I said, the trick is to know what is known."
>
> > > > > * * * * Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008
>
> > > > LOL!
>
> > > > maybe the trick is to know what is NOT known.
>
> > > *If you know it, then we can be assured it is not, not known.
>
> > False.
> > You can know that something is unknown.
>
> *No, YOU can't.
>
> > example: What happens to your soul after you die?
> > I know that I don't know that
>
> *Implies you know you have a soul. You don't.
> So you don't even know the basis of what you think
> you don't know.
>
> ScottW-

ok, you don't know whether you have a soul, there is another example.
Thanks!!!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 18, 4:15*pm, wrote:
> On 18 Mai, 13:33, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 18, 9:44*am, wrote:
>
> > > On 18 Mai, 12:30, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > On May 17, 6:32*pm, wrote:
>
> > > > > On 17 Mai, 19:09, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > " * * * Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
> > > > > > *As I said, the trick is to know what is known."
>
> > > > > > * * * * Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008
>
> > > > > LOL!
>
> > > > > maybe the trick is to know what is NOT known.
>
> > > > *If you know it, then we can be assured it is not, not known.
>
> > > False.
> > > You can know that something is unknown.
>
> > *No, YOU can't.
>
> > > example: What happens to your soul after you die?
> > > I know that I don't know that
>
> > *Implies you know you have a soul. You don't.
> > So you don't even know the basis of what you think
> > you don't know.

> ok, you don't know whether you have a soul, there is another example.
> Thanks!!!

2pid almost invariably comes around and argues your points for you.

[[email protected]]

On 18 Mai, 22:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On May 18, 4:15*pm, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18 Mai, 13:33, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On May 18, 9:44*am, wrote:
>
> > > > On 18 Mai, 12:30, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 17, 6:32*pm, wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 17 Mai, 19:09, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > " * * * Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
> > > > > > > *As I said, the trick is to know what is known."
>
> > > > > > > * * * * Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008
>
> > > > > > LOL!
>
> > > > > > maybe the trick is to know what is NOT known.
>
> > > > > *If you know it, then we can be assured it is not, not known.
>
> > > > False.
> > > > You can know that something is unknown.
>
> > > *No, YOU can't.
>
> > > > example: What happens to your soul after you die?
> > > > I know that I don't know that
>
> > > *Implies you know you have a soul. You don't.
> > > So you don't even know the basis of what you think
> > > you don't know.
> > ok, you don't know whether you have a soul, there is another example.
> > Thanks!!!
>
> 2pid almost invariably comes around and argues your points for you.-

and that is yet another thing he should know he doesn't know.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 18, 10:16*pm, wrote:
> On 18 Mai, 22:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

> > wrote:
> > On May 18, 4:15*pm, wrote:
>
> > > On 18 Mai, 13:33, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > On May 18, 9:44*am, wrote:
>
> > > > > On 18 Mai, 12:30, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 17, 6:32*pm, wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On 17 Mai, 19:09, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > " * * * Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
> > > > > > > > *As I said, the trick is to know what is known."
>
> > > > > > > > * * * * Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008
>
> > > > > > > LOL!
>
> > > > > > > maybe the trick is to know what is NOT known.
>
> > > > > > *If you know it, then we can be assured it is not, not known.
>
> > > > > False.
> > > > > You can know that something is unknown.
>
> > > > *No, YOU can't.
>
> > > > > example: What happens to your soul after you die?
> > > > > I know that I don't know that
>
> > > > *Implies you know you have a soul. You don't.
> > > > So you don't even know the basis of what you think
> > > > you don't know.
> > > ok, you don't know whether you have a soul, there is another example.
> > > Thanks!!!
>
> > 2pid almost invariably comes around and argues your points for you.-
>
> and that is yet another thing he should know he doesn't know.

I think it's more entertaining to keep 2pid in the dark about this.

[[email protected]]

On 18 Mai, 23:28, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On May 18, 8:16*pm, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18 Mai, 22:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On May 18, 4:15*pm, wrote:
>
> > > > On 18 Mai, 13:33, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 18, 9:44*am, wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 18 Mai, 12:30, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 17, 6:32*pm, wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On 17 Mai, 19:09, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > " * * * Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
> > > > > > > > > *As I said, the trick is to know what is known."
>
> > > > > > > > > * * * * Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008
>
> > > > > > > > LOL!
>
> > > > > > > > maybe the trick is to know what is NOT known.
>
> > > > > > > *If you know it, then we can be assured it is not, not known.

[[email protected]]

On 18 Mai, 23:29, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On May 18, 10:16*pm, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18 Mai, 22:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > > wrote:
> > > On May 18, 4:15*pm, wrote:
>
> > > > On 18 Mai, 13:33, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 18, 9:44*am, wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 18 Mai, 12:30, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 17, 6:32*pm, wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On 17 Mai, 19:09, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > " * * * Go ahead and suspect all knowledge if you wish.
> > > > > > > > > *As I said, the trick is to know what is known."
>
> > > > > > > > > * * * * Scottie Witlessmongrel, 28 December 2008
>
> > > > > > > > LOL!
>
> > > > > > > > maybe the trick is to know what is NOT known.
>
> > > > > > > *If you know it, then we can be assured it is not, not known.