May 11th 09, 07:41 AM
Il Tamponcino:
>>If you feel you can't discuss anyone of those without the others, I'm
sure I and anyone attentive will glad to hold you to that standard.
> > > Did anyone sell NAFTA to the US on the loss of jobs? No.
> > > Doing what you suggest is just to put our heads in the sand and ignore
> > > fatal consequences of policy choices because those consequences
> > > are discussed separately. It's ridiculous and it's dangerous.
> > The business powers-that-be pushed it through for their own benefit on a
> > level above national politics. See also: TARP.
> TARP is blip compared to the decades long economic decay brought
> on by our trade policies which actually ultimately led to government
> interventions like TARP.
Wow. What about monetary policy? Employment levels? You haven't shown
how those relate. But don't bother. Really."<<
In other words, if I point out one of your tires is low, I am morally
obligated to pu,p it up, test it for leaks, and insure you against
future flats.
>>If you feel you can't discuss anyone of those without the others, I'm
sure I and anyone attentive will glad to hold you to that standard.
> > > Did anyone sell NAFTA to the US on the loss of jobs? No.
> > > Doing what you suggest is just to put our heads in the sand and ignore
> > > fatal consequences of policy choices because those consequences
> > > are discussed separately. It's ridiculous and it's dangerous.
> > The business powers-that-be pushed it through for their own benefit on a
> > level above national politics. See also: TARP.
> TARP is blip compared to the decades long economic decay brought
> on by our trade policies which actually ultimately led to government
> interventions like TARP.
Wow. What about monetary policy? Employment levels? You haven't shown
how those relate. But don't bother. Really."<<
In other words, if I point out one of your tires is low, I am morally
obligated to pu,p it up, test it for leaks, and insure you against
future flats.