April 23rd 09, 07:33 AM
The Bell Curves of average intelligence by extended family group are
real. They do not lie. They have held up again and again in test after
test. Those results have real consequences.
Over and over we are told they are racist. In other words, they are
hate facts.
A person of 100 IQ is considered average as the number is a normed
standard, for a given population. If the normed average used is that
of US citizens generally, we can say that a 100 IQ person is generally
not smart enough to be a physician, a Ph.D candidate in any hard
science or technology field, or a successful trial attorney. He or she
may do well in most manufacturing or lower management positions,
however. A person of 90 IQ is generally considered "slow and dull
witted", but may succeed at many repetitive jobs, in food service,
etc. At 80 IQ, it is very difficult to place such a person in the
modern American workplace. They are considered "borderline retarded"
and probably society would be more effectively operated if they were
simply subsidized by welfare and parked in front of a television set
in an easy chair-provided they don't **** and make more low IQ
subsidees, or represent severe moral hazard to our leaders as voters
who will support any candidate plausibly (and how plausible do you
need to be, to an 80 IQ voter???) who will give them what they want.
These are the facts. Whether they are loving or hateful or completely
oblivious to human desires and needs is quite irrelevant. We ignore
them at our own peril.
real. They do not lie. They have held up again and again in test after
test. Those results have real consequences.
Over and over we are told they are racist. In other words, they are
hate facts.
A person of 100 IQ is considered average as the number is a normed
standard, for a given population. If the normed average used is that
of US citizens generally, we can say that a 100 IQ person is generally
not smart enough to be a physician, a Ph.D candidate in any hard
science or technology field, or a successful trial attorney. He or she
may do well in most manufacturing or lower management positions,
however. A person of 90 IQ is generally considered "slow and dull
witted", but may succeed at many repetitive jobs, in food service,
etc. At 80 IQ, it is very difficult to place such a person in the
modern American workplace. They are considered "borderline retarded"
and probably society would be more effectively operated if they were
simply subsidized by welfare and parked in front of a television set
in an easy chair-provided they don't **** and make more low IQ
subsidees, or represent severe moral hazard to our leaders as voters
who will support any candidate plausibly (and how plausible do you
need to be, to an 80 IQ voter???) who will give them what they want.
These are the facts. Whether they are loving or hateful or completely
oblivious to human desires and needs is quite irrelevant. We ignore
them at our own peril.