A civics test for 2pid

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.

So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
"the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
and never utter another word against them.

What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.

Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
of the people".

Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 29, 7:05*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> and never utter another word against them.
>
> What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> of the people".
>
> Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> LoL.

We can assume from the "chirping" that 2pid admits he's a hypocrite
full of hot air.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 31, 4:09*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 7:05*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> > We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> > So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> > continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> > majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> > "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> > and never utter another word against them.
>
> > What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> > into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> > don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> > Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> > included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> > majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> > of the people".
>
> > Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> > LoL.
>
> We can assume from the "chirping" that 2pid admits he's a hypocrite
> full of hot air.

Why are you so afraid to live up to your own standards?

Do you have a suspicion that you would lose the election? LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Mar 31, 2:52*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 4:09*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 7:05*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> > > We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> > > So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> > > continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> > > majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> > > "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> > > and never utter another word against them.
>
> > > What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> > > into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> > > don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> > > Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> > > included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> > > majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> > > of the people".
>
> > > Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> > > LoL.
>
> > We can assume from the "chirping" that 2pid admits he's a hypocrite
> > full of hot air.
>
> Why are you so afraid to live up to your own standards?
>
> Do you have a suspicion that you would lose the election? LoL.

LoL. 2pid has no faith in the "will of the people".

He's afraid they might trample his minority rights here. After all he
are the only imbecile on RAO. LoL.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> After all he are the only imbecile on RAO. LoL.

Last week, Witless declared imbeciles a "race" and branded me a
"racist". You and I should be sure to wear matching white hoods.

[calvin coolidge]

On Mar 29, 5:05�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> and never utter another word against them.
>
> What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> of the people".
>
> Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> LoL.

I like the fact you brought up the First Amendment, since that would
be his only real move. Since you took that off the table, there's no
response. Surprised?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 1, 3:31*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Apr 1, 8:36*am, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 5:05 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> > > We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> > > So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> > > continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> > > majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> > > "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> > > and never utter another word against them.
>
> > > What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> > > into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> > > don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> > > Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> > > included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> > > majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> > > of the people".
>
> > > Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> > > LoL.
>
> > I like the fact you brought up the First Amendment, since that would
> > be his only real move. *Since you took that off the table, there's no
> > response. *Surprised?
>
> * Calvin proves his own addiction.

It isn't the President who is addicted to posting OT drivel and will
not even stand behind his own "will of the people" tripe.

Not only is you a imbecile but your a hypocrite to.

> Meanwhile, if you'll prove you have a right to vote...I might consider
> it.

OK, 2pid, fair enough. No anonymous votes allowed. That even removes
me. Like a true republican you look to remove the votes that you're
fairly sure would go against you.

So since we agree to that when should we hold the poll?

[calvin coolidge]

On Apr 2, 10:35�am, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Apr 1, 3:00�pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 1, 1:31 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 1, 8:36 am, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 29, 5:05 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> > > > > We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> > > > > So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> > > > > continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> > > > > majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> > > > > "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> > > > > and never utter another word against them.
>
> > > > > What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> > > > > into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> > > > > don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> > > > > Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> > > > > included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> > > > > majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> > > > > of the people".
>
> > > > > Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> > > > > LoL.
>
> > > > I like the fact you brought up the First Amendment, since that would
> > > > be his only real move. Since you took that off the table, there's no
> > > > response. Surprised?
>
> > > Calvin proves his own addiction.
>
> > WTF?
>
> > > Meanwhile, if you'll prove you have a right to vote...I might consider
> > > it.
>
> > Speaking of addictions, I'm starting to think that Shhh!'s claim that
> > you are a speed freak is a ludic and compelling argument.
>
> �LoL. �A starter thinker is very apt description for you.

I'm trying to think of an apt description of someone who goes onto an
audio forum, argues constantly with everyone about politics and then
gets angry and calls everyone names when he is ridiculed for it.

Oh yeah...it's called an asshole.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 2, 12:35*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Apr 1, 3:00*pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:

> > Speaking of addictions, I'm starting to think that Shhh!'s claim that
> > you are a speed freak is a ludic and compelling argument.
>
> *LoL. *A starter thinker is very apt description for you.

LoL. A total lack of focus...again.

So, 2pid, I've even disqualified myself as a voter on whether you
should continue your OT barrages.

When should we put this question before the "will of the people"?

LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 1, 5:12*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2:52*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 4:09*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On Mar 29, 7:05*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> > > > We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> > > > So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> > > > continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> > > > majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> > > > "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> > > > and never utter another word against them.
>
> > > > What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> > > > into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> > > > don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> > > > Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> > > > included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> > > > majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> > > > of the people".
>
> > > > Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> > > > LoL.
>
> > > We can assume from the "chirping" that 2pid admits he's a hypocrite
> > > full of hot air.
>
> > Why are you so afraid to live up to your own standards?
>
> > Do you have a suspicion that you would lose the election? LoL.
>
> LoL. 2pid has no faith in the "will of the people".
>
> He's afraid they might trample his minority rights here. After all he
> are the only imbecile on RAO. LoL.

Where is our 'brave' 2pid when he's called upon to stand up for what
he believes in?

Is that him cowering in the corner? LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 3, 4:00*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Apr 2, 11:55*am, calvin coolidge >
> wrote:

> > On Apr 2, 10:35 am, ScottW2 > wrote:

> > > LoL. A starter thinker is very apt description for you.

> * Who's calling who names?

Are you really asking this, 2pid? LoL.

>* As a preacher you're falling short on example.

People of normal intelligence have "examples". People like 2pid have
'examples'.

The difference is not subtle. LoL.

[calvin coolidge]

On Apr 3, 2:00�pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Apr 2, 11:55�am, calvin coolidge >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 2, 10:35 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 1, 3:00 pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 1, 1:31 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 1, 8:36 am, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Mar 29, 5:05 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> > > > > > > We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> > > > > > > So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> > > > > > > continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> > > > > > > majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> > > > > > > "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> > > > > > > and never utter another word against them.
>
> > > > > > > What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> > > > > > > into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> > > > > > > don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> > > > > > > Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> > > > > > > included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> > > > > > > majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> > > > > > > of the people".
>
> > > > > > > Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> > > > > > > LoL.
>
> > > > > > I like the fact you brought up the First Amendment, since that would
> > > > > > be his only real move. Since you took that off the table, there's no
> > > > > > response. Surprised?
>
> > > > > Calvin proves his own addiction.
>
> > > > WTF?
>
> > > > > Meanwhile, if you'll prove you have a right to vote...I might consider
> > > > > it.
>
> > > > Speaking of addictions, I'm starting to think that Shhh!'s claim that
> > > > you are a speed freak is a ludic and compelling argument.
>
> > > LoL. A starter thinker is very apt description for you.
>
> > I'm trying to think of an apt description of someone who goes onto an
> > audio forum, argues constantly with everyone about politics and then
> > gets angry and calls everyone names when he is ridiculed for it.
>
> > Oh yeah...it's called an asshole.
>
> � Who's calling who names? � As a preacher you're falling short on
> example.

Yes, everyone else but you is completely wrong. You're an angel.
How's that for a name, creampuff?

Since RAO is obviously a dom-sub culture and you are obviously one of
the subs, I think I should start bringing you flowers and candy or
something.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 3, 8:55*pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Apr 3, 3:31*pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 3, 2:00 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 2, 11:55 am, calvin coolidge >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 2, 10:35 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 1, 3:00 pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Apr 1, 1:31 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 1, 8:36 am, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Mar 29, 5:05 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> > > > > > > > > We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> > > > > > > > > So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> > > > > > > > > continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> > > > > > > > > majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> > > > > > > > > "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> > > > > > > > > and never utter another word against them.
>
> > > > > > > > > What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> > > > > > > > > into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> > > > > > > > > don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> > > > > > > > > Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> > > > > > > > > included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> > > > > > > > > majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> > > > > > > > > of the people".
>
> > > > > > > > > Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> > > > > > > > > LoL.
>
> > > > > > > > I like the fact you brought up the First Amendment, since that would
> > > > > > > > be his only real move. Since you took that off the table, there's no
> > > > > > > > response. Surprised?
>
> > > > > > > Calvin proves his own addiction.
>
> > > > > > WTF?
>
> > > > > > > Meanwhile, if you'll prove you have a right to vote...I might consider
> > > > > > > it.
>
> > > > > > Speaking of addictions, I'm starting to think that Shhh!'s claim that
> > > > > > you are a speed freak is a ludic and compelling argument.
>
> > > > > LoL. A starter thinker is very apt description for you.
>
> > > > I'm trying to think of an apt description of someone who goes onto an
> > > > audio forum, argues constantly with everyone about politics and then
> > > > gets angry and calls everyone names when he is ridiculed for it.
>
> > > > Oh yeah...it's called an asshole.
>
> > > Who's calling who names? As a preacher you're falling short on
> > > example.
>
> > Yes, everyone else but you is completely wrong. *You're an angel.
> > How's that for a name, creampuff?
>
> * Now, now Calvin, don't get your diapers in a bunch. You'll get rash.
>
>
>
> > Since RAO is obviously a dom-sub culture
>
> *Obviously? *Is that the kind of party you're after? *LoL.
> I think I'll pass on your party.

I see that you're still too chicken for a vote on "the will of the
people".

That figures. It's obvious that you're just so much hot air and
bluster. LoL.

[calvin coolidge]

On Apr 3, 6:55�pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Apr 3, 3:31�pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 3, 2:00 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 2, 11:55 am, calvin coolidge >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 2, 10:35 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 1, 3:00 pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Apr 1, 1:31 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 1, 8:36 am, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Mar 29, 5:05 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> > > > > > > > > We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> > > > > > > > > So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> > > > > > > > > continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> > > > > > > > > majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> > > > > > > > > "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> > > > > > > > > and never utter another word against them.
>
> > > > > > > > > What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> > > > > > > > > into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> > > > > > > > > don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> > > > > > > > > Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> > > > > > > > > included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> > > > > > > > > majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> > > > > > > > > of the people".
>
> > > > > > > > > Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> > > > > > > > > LoL.
>
> > > > > > > > I like the fact you brought up the First Amendment, since that would
> > > > > > > > be his only real move. Since you took that off the table, there's no
> > > > > > > > response. Surprised?
>
> > > > > > > Calvin proves his own addiction.
>
> > > > > > WTF?
>
> > > > > > > Meanwhile, if you'll prove you have a right to vote...I might consider
> > > > > > > it.
>
> > > > > > Speaking of addictions, I'm starting to think that Shhh!'s claim that
> > > > > > you are a speed freak is a ludic and compelling argument.
>
> > > > > LoL. A starter thinker is very apt description for you.
>
> > > > I'm trying to think of an apt description of someone who goes onto an
> > > > audio forum, argues constantly with everyone about politics and then
> > > > gets angry and calls everyone names when he is ridiculed for it.
>
> > > > Oh yeah...it's called an asshole.
>
> > > Who's calling who names? As a preacher you're falling short on
> > > example.
>
> > Yes, everyone else but you is completely wrong. �You're an angel.
> > How's that for a name, creampuff?
>
> � Now, now Calvin, don't get your diapers in a bunch. You'll get rash.

Really? That's what you came up with? Really?

>
>
>
> > Since RAO is obviously a dom-sub culture
>
> �Obviously? �Is that the kind of party you're after? �LoL.
> I think I'll pass on your party.

Does that mean you're finally leaving?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 4, 10:54*am, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Apr 3, 11:27*pm, calvin coolidge >
> wrote:

> > On Apr 3, 6:55 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 3, 3:31 pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:

> > > > Since RAO is obviously a dom-sub culture
>
> > > Obviously? Is that the kind of party you're after? LoL.
> > > I think I'll pass on your party.
>
> > Does that mean you're finally leaving?
>
> *Hell no, I think a public forum is no place for a dom-sub
> party. *You should leave and find yourself a private venue
> for that nonsense. * I'll be very happy not to follow.

You already have, 2pid. You love getting spanked. That's why you're
here.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > > > > Since RAO is obviously a dom-sub culture
> >
> > > > Obviously? Is that the kind of party you're after? LoL.
> > > > I think I'll pass on your party.
> >
> > > Does that mean you're finally leaving?
> >
> > *Hell no, I think a public forum is no place for a dom-sub
> > party. *You should leave and find yourself a private venue
> > for that nonsense. * I'll be very happy not to follow.
>
> You already have, 2pid. You love getting spanked. That's why you're
> here.

He also gets to practice his Mindless Denial-by-Repetition Skillz.

[calvin coolidge]

On Apr 4, 8:54�am, ScottW2 > wrote:
> On Apr 3, 11:27�pm, calvin coolidge >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 3, 6:55 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 3, 3:31 pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 3, 2:00 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 2, 11:55 am, calvin coolidge >
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Apr 2, 10:35 am, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 1, 3:00 pm, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 1, 1:31 pm, ScottW2 > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 1, 8:36 am, calvin coolidge > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Mar 29, 5:05 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > OK, 2pid, we all know how much "the will of the people" means to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > We all know your peculiar selfish view of democracy too.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > So here's your test. I suggest we put whether or not you should
> > > > > > > > > > > continue your barrage of OT posts on RAO to a vote. A "no" vote by the
> > > > > > > > > > > majority means you have to stop posting them or otherwise run against
> > > > > > > > > > > "the will of the people". A "yes" vote means that I apologize to you
> > > > > > > > > > > and never utter another word against them.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > What do you say, 2pid? Are you willing to put your right to post here
> > > > > > > > > > > into the hands of others? You're for that with regards to SSM so I
> > > > > > > > > > > don't imagine that you'd have a problem here.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Remember, if you allow the majority to vote on rights all rights are
> > > > > > > > > > > included, so don't bother to whine about the First Amendment. If the
> > > > > > > > > > > majority votes against you, that doesn't matter. It would be "the will
> > > > > > > > > > > of the people".
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Or is everything you've said on the matter just hot air and hypocrisy?
> > > > > > > > > > > LoL.
>
> > > > > > > > > > I like the fact you brought up the First Amendment, since that would
> > > > > > > > > > be his only real move. Since you took that off the table, there's no
> > > > > > > > > > response. Surprised?
>
> > > > > > > > > Calvin proves his own addiction.
>
> > > > > > > > WTF?
>
> > > > > > > > > Meanwhile, if you'll prove you have a right to vote...I might consider
> > > > > > > > > it.
>
> > > > > > > > Speaking of addictions, I'm starting to think that Shhh!'s claim that
> > > > > > > > you are a speed freak is a ludic and compelling argument.
>
> > > > > > > LoL. A starter thinker is very apt description for you.
>
> > > > > > I'm trying to think of an apt description of someone who goes onto an
> > > > > > audio forum, argues constantly with everyone about politics and then
> > > > > > gets angry and calls everyone names when he is ridiculed for it..
>
> > > > > > Oh yeah...it's called an asshole.
>
> > > > > Who's calling who names? As a preacher you're falling short on
> > > > > example.
>
> > > > Yes, everyone else but you is completely wrong. You're an angel.
> > > > How's that for a name, creampuff?
>
> > > Now, now Calvin, don't get your diapers in a bunch. You'll get rash.
>
> > Really? �That's what you came up with? �Really?
>
> > > > Since RAO is obviously a dom-sub culture
>
> > > Obviously? Is that the kind of party you're after? LoL.
> > > I think I'll pass on your party.
>
> > Does that mean you're finally leaving?
>
> �Hell no, I think a public forum is no place for a dom-sub
> party. �

You do realize that there are many public forums dedicated to the BDSM
lifestyle. It looks like all those people are having much more fun
than you.

You should leave and find yourself a private venue
> for that nonsense. � I'll be very happy not to follow.

So what are you into? Water sports?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

calvin coolidge said:

> > Hell no, I think a public forum is no place for a dom-sub
> > party. ?

> You do realize that there are many public forums dedicated to the BDSM
> lifestyle. It looks like all those people are having much more fun
> than you.

As if. Scottie is the definition of sexually repressed. He can't even
look his cock-sucking fantasy in the eye. ;-)

> > I'll be very happy not to follow.
>
> So what are you into? Water sports?

duh... Scottie have pool in backyard. Scottie play fetch with pups.
duh-woof!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Apr 4, 1:29*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > > > > Since RAO is obviously a dom-sub culture
>
> > > > > Obviously? Is that the kind of party you're after? LoL.
> > > > > I think I'll pass on your party.
>
> > > > Does that mean you're finally leaving?
>
> > > *Hell no, I think a public forum is no place for a dom-sub
> > > party. *You should leave and find yourself a private venue
> > > for that nonsense. * I'll be very happy not to follow.
>
> > You already have, 2pid. You love getting spanked. That's why you're
> > here.
>
> He also gets to practice his Mindless Denial-by-Repetition Skillz.

I see he's at it again.

Autism must be a terrible burden for 2pid to bear.