Re: Arny the engineer

[John Atkinson[_2_]]

On Jan 30, 12:44 pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "John Atkinson" > wrote in message
>
> > On Jan 30, 7:53 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >> "John Atkinson" > wrote in
> >>
> >>> On Jan 29, 11:27 pm, "TT" > wrote:
> >>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...>
> >>>> "Harry Lavo" > wrote in message
>
> >>>>>> Judging from his ABX website, I'm sure it is right up
> >>>>>> there with his work as an "audio professional". And
> >>>>>> just as available,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Post a working URL for the ABX web site or admit that
> >>>>> you are lying about it existing, Harry.
> >>>>
> >>>>http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.pcabx.com
> >>>
> >>> Ah, memories! Mr. Krueger used to claim that this
> >>> site had 1000s of visitors every month, that it
> >>> rivaled the sites run by magazines. Yet now it
> >>> only exists courtesy of the [obsessive] servers
> >>> at web.archive.org :-)
> >>
> >> Except they don't have most of the site. Actually, hardly
> >> any of it at all.
> >
> > External features aren't preserved, of course, as the
> > servers that stored them are presumably repurposed or
> > defunct.
>
> So what are you saying John, is the site as I said, or not?

You are incorrect, Mr. Krueger. The pages I visited were
complete enough for the skill of those involved in the
website to be judged.

> > But the core of your dead site is preserved,
> > which is sufficient to support Harry Lavo's statement.
>
> Nope. Remember, I know what the site is supposed to be like.

And everyone else can still _see_ what it looked like, Mr.
Krueger and form our own opinions on your skills as a
"professional" website operator.

> where are all the tests of representative low
> cost CD players that you've promised and not delivered?

I see you are now playing the game you've played
before, Mr. Krueger: that if you don't click on a link
I've provided you in another thread, you can say in
_this_thread that the page's contents don't exist.
You might think that by doing you are advancing
your "Usenet Career," as you call it, Mr. Krueger,
but personally, I think you just appear dumb. :-)

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

John Atkinson said:

> You might think that by doing you are advancing
> your "Usenet Career," as you call it, Mr. Krueger,
> but personally, I think you just appear dumb. :-)

Either way, Arnii receives the disdain and denigration he craves. Thank's
Jhon for, satissfying Arnii's need for abuse Joohn.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Scottie has another misadventure in the Land Of Words He Don't Know.

> > I think you just appear dumb. :-)

> A smiley after a crack like that looks pretty stupid[sic] to me.

What an odd locution. I see you're still unable to express your hatred of
John in a comprehensible fashion. Would you like somebody to explain the
human meaning of "stupid", or would you prefer to continue mocking yourself?

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Jan 30, 11:32*am, John Atkinson > wrote:
>
> > I think you just appear dumb. :-)
> >
>
> A smiley after a crack like that looks pretty stupid to me.

Tim Goodman: Always on the bleeding edge of dumb.

Stephen

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:


> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find

What recording was that?

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find
>
> What recording was that?

Actually two, if memory serves:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FDFRPU

and

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00076AE3U

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find
> >
> > What recording was that?
>
> Actually two, if memory serves:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FDFRPU
>
> and
>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00076AE3U

Do you mean the best orchestral recording overall, or only IRT dynamic
range?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 30, 9:49*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
> *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > > In article
> > > >, "Arny
> > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find
>
> > > What recording was that?
>
> > Actually two, if memory serves:
>
> >http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FDFRPU
>
> > and
>
> >http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00076AE3U
>
> Do you mean the best orchestral recording overall, or only IRT dynamic
> range?

There goes my good opinion of the Minnesota Orchestra. If GOIA likes
it there's something wrong with them.

Damn. I used to like them quite a lot. ;-)

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to
>>>> find
>>>
>>> What recording was that?
>>
>> Actually two, if memory serves:
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FDFRPU
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00076AE3U
>
> Do you mean the best orchestral recording overall, or
> only IRT dynamic range?

Convening a class in remedial Critical Thinking 101 especially for Jenn:

What was the context, Jenn?

"Best all time orchestral recordings" or "Dynamic Range"?

Not so much the first. ;-)

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to
> >>>> find
> >>>
> >>> What recording was that?
> >>
> >> Actually two, if memory serves:
> >>
> >> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FDFRPU
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00076AE3U
> >
> > Do you mean the best orchestral recording overall, or
> > only IRT dynamic range?
>
> Convening a class in remedial Critical Thinking 101 especially for Jenn:
>
> What was the context, Jenn?
>
> "Best all time orchestral recordings" or "Dynamic Range"?
>
> Not so much the first. ;-)

This is what happens when you attempt to start a discussion about audio
with Arny.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:


>>>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find has about
>>>>>> 82 dB
>>>>>> dynamic range. Playing it on a player with 92 dB dynamic range only
>>>>>> hurts
>> >>> the effective dynamic range by a fraction of a dB. And its all
>> >>> moot,
>>>>>> because if you play the recording at sensible volume levels the
>>>>>> ambient
>>>>>> noise in just about any residential listening room will mask it all.

This is what Jenn, in a fit of Middiocy grotesquely redacted the above
paragraph into:

>>>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find

(note that in her rush to deceit driven by anger, Jenn does not show that
she edited my post in any way. Academic honesty requires that she add least
an ellipses to show where she cut the text.) Any good teacher who read the
entire paragraph she mangled would ream her strongly for her horrifically
bad editing.)

>>>>> What recording was that?

Note that I do some research and answer her question precisely:

>>>> Actually two, if memory serves:

>>>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FDFRPU

>>>> and

>>>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00076AE3U

This is what happens when you try to communicate with Jenn: She strips out a
carefully-constructed context in order to create an easily-disproven
Middiotic hyperbole:

>>> Do you mean the best orchestral recording overall, or
>>> only IRT dynamic range?

>> Convening a class in remedial Critical Thinking 101
>> especially for Jenn:

>> What was the context, Jenn?

>> "Best all time orchestral recordings" or "Dynamic Range"?

>> Not so much the first. ;-)

> This is what happens when you attempt to start a
> discussion about audio with Arny.

Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your attention starts
wavering and you lapse into Middiocy. That's what happens to people who get
seduced by the Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that around
you.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
> >>>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find has about
> >>>>>> 82 dB
> >>>>>> dynamic range. Playing it on a player with 92 dB dynamic range only
> >>>>>> hurts
> >> >>> the effective dynamic range by a fraction of a dB. And its all
> >> >>> moot,
> >>>>>> because if you play the recording at sensible volume levels the
> >>>>>> ambient
> >>>>>> noise in just about any residential listening room will mask it all.
>
> This is what Jenn, in a fit of Middiocy grotesquely redacted the above
> paragraph into:
>
> >>>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find
>
> (note that in her rush to deceit driven by anger, Jenn does not show that
> she edited my post in any way. Academic honesty requires that she add least
> an ellipses to show where she cut the text.) Any good teacher who read the
> entire paragraph she mangled would ream her strongly for her horrifically
> bad editing.)
>
> >>>>> What recording was that?
>
> Note that I do some research and answer her question precisely:
>
> >>>> Actually two, if memory serves:
>
> >>>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FDFRPU
>
> >>>> and
>
> >>>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00076AE3U
>
> This is what happens when you try to communicate with Jenn: She strips out a
> carefully-constructed context in order to create an easily-disproven
> Middiotic hyperbole:
>
> >>> Do you mean the best orchestral recording overall, or
> >>> only IRT dynamic range?
>
> >> Convening a class in remedial Critical Thinking 101
> >> especially for Jenn:
>
> >> What was the context, Jenn?
>
> >> "Best all time orchestral recordings" or "Dynamic Range"?
>
> >> Not so much the first. ;-)
>
> > This is what happens when you attempt to start a
> > discussion about audio with Arny.
>
> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your attention starts
> wavering and you lapse into Middiocy. That's what happens to people who get
> seduced by the Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that around
> you.

This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny. You regularly
through a bitch fit about something that you do quite often. In this
case, it is "editing" a post. You've done that a lot in order to make
fake arguments. I did it in an honest attempt to get into an audio
discussion with you, without any rancour whatsoever. What possible
dastardly deed do you claim that I was attempting by simply trimming a
post? A simple answer would have sufficed.

[Clyde Slick]

On 31 Ian, 20:12, Jenn > wrote:
\
>
> This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny. *You regularly
> through a bitch fit about something that you do quite often. *

In another recent case on this thread, he hit the send
button on a blank ost

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 31 Ian, 20:12, Jenn > wrote:
> \
> >
> > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny. *You regularly
> > through a bitch fit about something that you do quite often. *
>
> In another recent case on this thread, he hit the send
> button on a blank ost

In defense of Arny, his point, though pointless, was in his attack
subject line. A tactic that he has complained about others using, btw.
Yet another example of him wanting others to behave in a way that he is
not willing to do himself.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny. *You regularly
> > > through a bitch fit about something that you do quite often. *
> >
> > In another recent case on this thread, he hit the send
> > button on a blank ost
>
> In defense of Arny, his point, though pointless, was in his attack
> subject line. A tactic that he has complained about others using, btw.
> Yet another example of him wanting others to behave in a way that he is
> not willing to do himself.

Arnii is Special, you know.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jan 31, 2:59*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message

> This is what Jenn, in a fit of Middiocy grotesquely redacted the above
> paragraph into:
>
> >>>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find

Let's see the whole quote, GOIA:

"The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find has about
82 dB dynamic range."

> (note that in her rush to deceit driven by anger, Jenn does not show that
> she edited my post in any way. Academic honesty requires that she add least
> an ellipses to show where she cut the text.) Any good teacher who read the
> entire paragraph she mangled would ream her strongly for her horrifically
> bad editing.)

Points to GOIA for accurately portraying a schoolmarm and ignoring his
glaring descent into assholedom.

> >>>>> What recording was that?
>
> Note that I do some research and answer her question precisely:
>
> >>>> Actually two, if memory serves:
> >>>>http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FDFRPU
> >>>> and
> >>>>http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00076AE3U
>
> This is what happens when you try to communicate with Jenn: She strips out a
> carefully-constructed context in order to create an easily-disproven
> Middiotic hyperbole:

Let's look at the sentence in question again:

"The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find has about
82 dB dynamic range."

> >>> Do you mean the best orchestral recording overall, or
> >>> only IRT dynamic range?

A very reasonable question based on the butchered English GOIA
deployed.

> >> Convening a class in remedial Critical Thinking 101
> >> especially for Jenn:
> >> What was the context, Jenn?
> >> "Best all time orchestral recordings" or "Dynamic Range"?
> >> Not so much the first. ;-)

The why did you call it the "best recording"?

> > This is what happens when you attempt to start a
> > discussion about audio with Arny.
>
> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your attention starts
> wavering and you lapse into Middiocy. That's what happens to people who get
> seduced by the Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that around
> you.

"The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find has about
82 dB dynamic range."

Try this next time, GOIA:

"The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find with regard
to dynamic range has about 82 dB dynamic range."

See how that clears it right up?

If I said "The very best electric guitar I've ever played had three
pickups" it can be read at least two ways.

Poor GOIA! He is just like 2pid and cannot effectively communicate!

[Harry Lavo]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>> In article
>> >, "Arny
>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>
>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> >, "Arny
>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article
>>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find has about
>>>>>>> 82 dB
>>>>>>> dynamic range. Playing it on a player with 92 dB dynamic range only
>>>>>>> hurts
>>> >>> the effective dynamic range by a fraction of a dB. And its all
>>> >>> moot,
>>>>>>> because if you play the recording at sensible volume levels the
>>>>>>> ambient
>>>>>>> noise in just about any residential listening room will mask it all.
>
> This is what Jenn, in a fit of Middiocy grotesquely redacted the above
> paragraph into:
>
>>>>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find
>
> (note that in her rush to deceit driven by anger, Jenn does not show that
> she edited my post in any way. Academic honesty requires that she add
> least an ellipses to show where she cut the text.) Any good teacher who
> read the entire paragraph she mangled would ream her strongly for her
> horrifically bad editing.)
>

Oh this is rich. From the man who routinely snips entire sections of posts
when what they contain annoy or refute him....all withou reference of a
"snip" to indicate that it is missing, much less "why" it was snipped.
This is one of Arny's routine practices on this forum and on others....and
he has been called out for it by others beside myself.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Harry Lavo" > wrote:

> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
> > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> >> In article
> >> >, "Arny
> >> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>
> >>>> In article
> >>>> >, "Arny
> >>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> In article
> >>>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find has about
> >>>>>>> 82 dB
> >>>>>>> dynamic range. Playing it on a player with 92 dB dynamic range only
> >>>>>>> hurts
> >>> >>> the effective dynamic range by a fraction of a dB. And its all
> >>> >>> moot,
> >>>>>>> because if you play the recording at sensible volume levels the
> >>>>>>> ambient
> >>>>>>> noise in just about any residential listening room will mask it all.
> >
> > This is what Jenn, in a fit of Middiocy grotesquely redacted the above
> > paragraph into:
> >
> >>>>>>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find
> >
> > (note that in her rush to deceit driven by anger, Jenn does not show that
> > she edited my post in any way. Academic honesty requires that she add
> > least an ellipses to show where she cut the text.) Any good teacher who
> > read the entire paragraph she mangled would ream her strongly for her
> > horrifically bad editing.)
> >
>
> Oh this is rich. From the man who routinely snips entire sections of posts
> when what they contain annoy or refute him....all withou reference of a
> "snip" to indicate that it is missing, much less "why" it was snipped.
> This is one of Arny's routine practices on this forum and on others....and
> he has been called out for it by others beside myself.

I'm trying to discern how he believes I was trying to pull any kind of
fast one on him.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
>> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
>> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
>> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
>> around you.

> This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.

Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
intellectual dishonesty.

> You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> you do quite often.

Prove it.

> In this case, it is "editing" a post.

No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.

> You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.

Prove it.

> I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> whatsoever.

It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how rediculous you
were being until I went back and looked at my OP.

> What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?

Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you to
task for such an obvious example of deception.

Get more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and the
Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible thing
I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.

> A simple answer would have sufficed.

I gave you that in the OP Jenn, but you decided to go for as much
consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure that
eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
feeling of "being one of the boys".

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> >> around you.
>
> > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
>
> Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
> intellectual dishonesty.
>
> > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > you do quite often.
>
> Prove it.
>
> > In this case, it is "editing" a post.
>
> No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
>
> > You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
>
> Prove it.
>
> > I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > whatsoever.
>
> It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how rediculous you
> were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
>
> > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
>
> Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you to
> task for such an obvious example of deception.
>
> Get more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and the
> Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible thing
> I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.
>
> > A simple answer would have sufficed.
>
> I gave you that in the OP Jenn, but you decided to go for as much
> consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure that
> eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
> feeling of "being one of the boys".

My God, Arny.

I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience". I
"get" at least part of your problem now. I'm sorry that I've upset you.
I won't be posting to you again.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message


> My God, Arny.

If you were a Christian Jenn, you wouldn't take the Lord's name in vain like
that.

> I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road
> experience". I "get" at least part of your problem now.

The problem Jenn is yours.

> I'm sorry that I've upset you. I won't be posting to you again.

Fat chance.

Like I told Marc, its too bad that you guys have such lousy lives that you
sit here on RAO for hours, waiting for a post by me to pounce on.
Meanwhile, I enjoy life in places you never go because of your devotion to
Middiocy.

[Boon]

On Jan 31, 9:17�pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > My God, Arny.
>
> If you were a Christian Jenn, you wouldn't take the Lord's name in vain like
> that.
>
> > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road
> > experience". �I "get" at least part of your problem now.
>
> The problem Jenn is yours.
>
> > I'm sorry that I've upset you. I won't be posting to you again.
>
> Fat chance.
>
> Like I told Marc, its too bad that you guys have such lousy lives that you
> sit here on RAO for hours, waiting for �a post by me to pounce on..
> Meanwhile, I enjoy life in places you never go because of your devotion to
> Middiocy.

That would be part of your fantasy construct. On one side, I have
"unexplained absences" that must mean I've been in jail. At other
times, I post too much just because I'm responding to you within a
half hour. Just a few days ago you complained of the latter,
neglecting the fact that you responsded to my post in just a couple of
minutes.

You're making it up as you go along. That's another aspect of your
personality disorders.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Jan 31, 9:17?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> My God, Arny.
>>
>> If you were a Christian Jenn, you wouldn't take the
>> Lord's name in vain like that.
>>
>>> I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road
>>> experience". ?I "get" at least part of your problem now.
>>
>> The problem Jenn is yours.
>>
>>> I'm sorry that I've upset you. I won't be posting to
>>> you again.
>>
>> Fat chance.
>>
>> Like I told Marc, its too bad that you guys have such
>> lousy lives that you sit here on RAO for hours, waiting
>> for ?a post by me to pounce on. Meanwhile, I enjoy life
>> in places you never go because of your devotion to
>> Middiocy.
>
> That would be part of your fantasy construct. On one
> side, I have "unexplained absences" that must mean I've
> been in jail.

Really Marc. Why are you confessing that now?

> At other times, I post too much just
> because I'm responding to you within a half hour.

Actually tonight it has been as little as seven minutes, maybe even less.

See Marc, when you start obsessing over me, you lose track of time. You
think that you are denying yourself the fulfillment of your obsession with
me for a half hour, and its really 7 minutes or less.

Stop now Marc while there is still a possibility that you can recover from
your addiction to the Middiocy. You have a wife and children to return to. I
am not really as important to you as you think.

[Boon]

On Jan 31, 9:29�pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 31, 9:17?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> My God, Arny.
>
> >> If you were a Christian Jenn, you wouldn't take the
> >> Lord's name in vain like that.
>
> >>> I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road
> >>> experience". ?I "get" at least part of your problem now.
>
> >> The problem Jenn is yours.
>
> >>> I'm sorry that I've upset you. I won't be posting to
> >>> you again.
>
> >> Fat chance.
>
> >> Like I told Marc, its too bad that you guys have such
> >> lousy lives that you sit here on RAO for hours, waiting
> >> for ?a post by me to pounce on. Meanwhile, I enjoy life
> >> in places you never go because of your devotion to
> >> Middiocy.
>
> > That would be part of your fantasy construct. �On one
> > side, I have "unexplained absences" that must mean I've
> > been in jail.
>
> Really Marc. Why are you confessing that now?
>
> > � At other times, I post too much just
> > because I'm responding to you within a half hour.
>
> Actually tonight it has been as little as seven minutes, maybe even less.

Nice that you snipped the rest of my post, missing the point. Didn't
you just complain of Jenn doing the same thing?

>
> See Marc, when you start obsessing over me, you lose track of time. �You
> think that you are denying yourself the fulfillment of your obsession with
> me for a half hour, and its really 7 minutes or less.

No, I'm sitting here, playing with you. Every time I make a post,
there's a new one to read and reply to. I've set aside a certain part
of my day to play on RAO. No obsession, no losing track of the time.
That's how it is for normal people. Posting on Internet forums is a
normal activity, not the life and death struggle you make it to be.

>
> Stop now Marc while there is still a possibility that you can recover from
> your addiction to the Middiocy.

There is no such thing as "an addiction to the Middiocy." It's part
of your fantasy construct, and it does not exist in the real world.

>You have a wife and children to return to.

I do? My wife is in Canada, working on a movie. My kids are hanging
out and playing video games. I can devote as much time to you as I
want.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message


> I can devote as much time to you as I want.


That's right Marc, as you just said you want to devote all of your time to
me, if I will only keep responding to your plaintive pleas for my attention.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> There is no such thing as "an addiction to the Middiocy." It's part
> of your fantasy construct, and it does not exist in the real world.

Isn't it unfair how we use pejorative neologisms like Kroopologist and
Krooglish and nobody steps up to scold us?

[Boon]

On Jan 31, 9:41�pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > �I can devote as much time to you as I want.
>
> That's right Marc, as you just said you want to devote all of your time to
> me, if I will only keep responding to your plaintive pleas for my attention.

That's part of your fantasy construct. In reality, you're responding
to me much quicker than I am to you. I think you're concerned about my
responses because I'm telling the truth, you know it and it hurts a
lot. If you need proof, simply let Susan read your posts in this
thread. Don't you trust her anymore?

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Jan 31, 9:41?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> ?I can devote as much time to you as I want.
>>
>> That's right Marc, as you just said you want to devote
>> all of your time to me, if I will only keep responding
>> to your plaintive pleas for my attention.
>
> That's part of your fantasy construct. In reality,
> you're responding to me much quicker than I am to you.

The difference is Marc, that I know that. Unlike you I'm not saying that I'm
waiting for a half hour.

I can respond much quicker than you Marc for a number of reasons, all
indicators that you are mentally and physically slow.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> If you need proof, simply let Susan read your posts in this thread.
> Don't you trust her anymore?

I don't know about Turdy and his domestic menage, but I can tell you what
happened when I shared RAO with other people. Every one of them looked at me
with pity and bemusement. Once I was overheard by the guy in the next cube.
He said I was "cackling" and I showed him some of that day's RAO badinage.

Nobody understands completely, but some non-RAO Normals can sort of follow
along. I doubt an uptight religious freak like Mrs. Krooger could though.
Arnii's cowardice in this case is justified.

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Feb, 00:29, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 31, 9:17?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> My God, Arny.
>
> >> If you were a Christian Jenn, you wouldn't take the
> >> Lord's name in vain like that.
>
> >>> I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road
> >>> experience". ?I "get" at least part of your problem now.
>
> >> The problem Jenn is yours.
>
> >>> I'm sorry that I've upset you. I won't be posting to
> >>> you again.
>
> >> Fat chance.
>
> >> Like I told Marc, its too bad that you guys have such
> >> lousy lives that you sit here on RAO for hours, waiting
> >> for ?a post by me to pounce on. Meanwhile, I enjoy life
> >> in places you never go because of your devotion to
> >> Middiocy.
>
> > That would be part of your fantasy construct. *On one
> > side, I have "unexplained absences" that must mean I've
> > been in jail.
>
> Really Marc. Why are you confessing that now?
>
> > * At other times, I post too much just
> > because I'm responding to you within a half hour.
>
> Actually tonight it has been as little as seven minutes, maybe even less.
>

LOL!!!!!
it took you less than one minute
to respond to Marc!!!!

[Arny Krueger]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message


> it took you less than one minute
> to respond to Marc!!!!

See, I told you thatit didn't take me much time to waste you guys.

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Feb, 07:55, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > it took you less than one minute
> > to respond to Marc!!!!
>
> See, I told you thatit didn't take me much time to waste you guys.

wipe the brown streak from your chair seat
you know susan doesn't appreciate that.
next time use the toilet for your waste product.

[Iain Churches[_2_]]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...


> Meanwhile, I enjoy life in places you never go ......(snip)

So you can see the fires of Detroit, hear the small arms fire,
and the shouts of the looters from your garden??

How very nice:-)

Iain

[Arny Krueger]

"Iain Churches" > wrote in message
i.fi
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>
>> Meanwhile, I enjoy life in places you never go
>> ......(snip)
>
> So you can see the fires of Detroit,

I live too far away to see the fires, but we occasionally smell their smoke.

> hear the small arms fire,

I live too far away for that.

> and the shouts of the looters from your garden??

There hasn't been significant looting in Detroit since the 1967 riots, and I
lived elsewhere at that time.

> How very nice:-)

Such petty annoyances as do happen serve to chase the cowards like Iain
away.

[Boon]

On Feb 1, 4:55�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > it took you less than one minute
> > to respond to Marc!!!!
>
> See, I told you that my life is meaningless without you guys.

That's what we thought.

Boon

[Boon]

On Jan 31, 10:01�pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 31, 9:51?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Jan 31, 9:41?pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> ?I can devote as much time to you as I want.
>
> >>>> That's right Marc, as you just said you want to devote
> >>>> all of your time to me, if I will only keep responding
> >>>> to your plaintive pleas for my attention.
>
> >>> That's part of your fantasy construct. ?In reality,
> >>> you're responding to me much quicker than I am to you.
>
> >> The difference is Marc, that I know that. Unlike you I'm
> >> not saying that I'm waiting for a half hour.
>
> > That's part of your fantasy construct. �That's not
> > happening. �If you need proof, simply let Susan read your
> > posts in this thread. �Don't you trust her anymore?
>
> I trust Susan fine. However I know what she thinks of your many slurs to the
> memory of our son. No need to aggravate her with your weirdness.

That's part of your fantasy construct. Susan does not know who I am.
She has little or no information about your posting behaviors here.
If she did, she would probably leave.

In addition, I have not slurred the memory of your son. In fact, I've
defended it. You're the one who has trashed it on the Internet by
dredging it up everytime you feel cornered.

>
> >> I can respond much quicker than you Marc for a number of
> >> reasons, all indicators that you are mentally and
> >> physically slow.
> > That's inconsistent with what you said.
>
> You'll lying again Marc. I said nothing about my posting response.

I'm not lying. You're just too dumb to understand. That's part of
your fantasy construct, that you understand everything. In the real
world, you're a bit of a simpleton.

>
> > If I respond too quickly, I'm obsessive.
>
> Exactly, Marc. I came home near midnight from a party and it was obvious
> that you were just hanging around RAO, waiting for me to bring a little
> excitement into your dreary life as a baby sitter.

It's funny that you refer to spending time with your children as
babysitting. That speaks volumes about your parenting skills.

You know, one of the features of narcissistic personality disorders is
that sufferers tend to elevate the accomplishments of their children
to unrealistic levels as well. People with NPD consider their
children as extensions of themselves. Knowing that you suffer from
NPD and seeing your claims about all the advanced degrees your
children possess, I think we all have to assume that you're lying
about them. It's highly unlikely that a failure such are yourself
could raise such excellent children. I'm sure your kids are just
ordinary schlubs like yourself, trying to eke out a living in a harsh
world.

>
> G'Night Marc. Life in the real world awaits me, but obviously not you.

That's a very typical response from someone who has no life. I'm sure
my day was infinitely more interesting than yours. I interviewed a
famous musician in the morning, had lunch with the owner of Music
Millenium and received a pair of one of my favorite speakers of all
time for review. It was sunny so I went for a beautiful walk. Then I
made dinner for my children and we watched a movie together. Then I
tried to counsel a poor lost soul on the Internet who has been
suffering from a serious personality disorder for many years. I don't
know if I made any progress, but I did keep him up after 1am, so I
think I planted a few seeds. He made up some story about going to a
party, but I'm sure his wife just dragged him out of the house to get
him away from his computer.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Feb, 12:57, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Iain Churches" > wrote in message
>
> i.fi
>
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >> Meanwhile, I enjoy life in places you never go
> >> ......(snip)
>
> > So *you can see the fires of Detroit,
>
> I live too far away to see the fires, but we occasionally smell their smoke.
>

the real reson they set those fires is to mask the odor of Arny's turd
collection.

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

You may not claim it, but you surely are, JA. You're also polite, not
to mention amazed, contemptuous, tolerant, and stunned among other
states I've seen you exhibit over time.

Herbert
>
>I have never claimed to be "nice," merely polite. :-)
>
>John Atkinson
>Editor, Stereophile
>

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Jan 31, 9:04*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > > > In article
> > > > >, "Arny
> > > > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > >> around you.
> >
> > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
> >
> > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
> > > intellectual dishonesty.
> >
> > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > you do quite often.
> >
> > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > *In this case, it is "editing" a post.
> >
> > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
> >
> > > > *You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
> >
> > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > *I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > whatsoever.
> >
> > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how rediculous
> > > you
> > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
> >
> > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
> >
> > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you to
> > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
> >
> > > Get *more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and the
> > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible
> > > thing
> > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.
> >
> > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
> >
> > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, *but you decided to go for as much
> > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure
> > > that
> > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
> > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
> >
> > My God, Arny.
> >
> > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience". *I
> > "get" at least part of your problem now. *I'm sorry that I've upset you. *
> > I won't be posting to you again.
>
> "finally"? I think I've read all this before.
>
> ScottW

Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. I've
seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
fear for him.

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" > wrote in message

> On Jan 31, 9:04 pm, Jenn > wrote:

>> I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road
>> experience". I "get" at least part of your problem now.
>> I'm sorry that I've upset you. I won't be posting to you
>> again.
>
> "finally"? I think I've read all this before.

You did. Jenn's locked in a loop. She need to power down if she is to ever
get out of it.

[Boon]

On Feb 1, 1:53�pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> �ScottW > wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 9:04�pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > In article >,
> > > �"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > >
> > > > > In article
> > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > >> around you.
>
> > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
>
> > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
> > > > intellectual dishonesty.
>
> > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > you do quite often.
>
> > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > �In this case, it is "editing" a post.
>
> > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
>
> > > > > �You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
>
> > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > �I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > whatsoever.
>
> > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how rediculous
> > > > you
> > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
>
> > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
>
> > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you to
> > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
>
> > > > Get �more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and the
> > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible
> > > > thing
> > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.
>
> > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
>
> > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, �but you decided to go for as much
> > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure
> > > > that
> > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
> > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
>
> > > My God, Arny.
>
> > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience". �I
> > > "get" at least part of your problem now. �I'm sorry that I've upset you. �
> > > I won't be posting to you again.
>
> > "finally"? � I think I've read all this before.
>
> > ScottW
>
> Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. �I've
> seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> fear for him.

Same here. He's definitely going down a new road to Crazyville. I
can't tag along for much longer.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Feb, 16:53, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 9:04*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > In article >,
> > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > >
> > > > > In article
> > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > >> around you.
>
> > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
>
> > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
> > > > intellectual dishonesty.
>
> > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > you do quite often.
>
> > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > *In this case, it is "editing" a post.
>
> > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
>
> > > > > *You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
>
> > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > *I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > whatsoever.
>
> > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how rediculous
> > > > you
> > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
>
> > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
>
> > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you to
> > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
>
> > > > Get *more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and the
> > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible
> > > > thing
> > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.
>
> > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
>
> > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, *but you decided to go for as much
> > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure
> > > > that
> > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
> > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
>
> > > My God, Arny.
>
> > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience". *I
> > > "get" at least part of your problem now. *I'm sorry that I've upset you. *
> > > I won't be posting to you again.
>
> > "finally"? * I think I've read all this before.
>
> > ScottW
>
> Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> fear for him.-

why not keep talking to him until the
very minute of his psychiatric implosion?

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 1 Feb, 16:53, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Jan 31, 9:04*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > > >> around you.
> >
> > > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
> >
> > > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
> > > > > intellectual dishonesty.
> >
> > > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > > you do quite often.
> >
> > > > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > > > *In this case, it is "editing" a post.
> >
> > > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
> >
> > > > > > *You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
> >
> > > > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > > > *I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > > whatsoever.
> >
> > > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how
> > > > > rediculous
> > > > > you
> > > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
> >
> > > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
> >
> > > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you
> > > > > to
> > > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
> >
> > > > > Get *more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and
> > > > > the
> > > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible
> > > > > thing
> > > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.
> >
> > > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
> >
> > > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, *but you decided to go for as much
> > > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure
> > > > > that
> > > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
> > > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
> >
> > > > My God, Arny.
> >
> > > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience". *I
> > > > "get" at least part of your problem now. *I'm sorry that I've upset
> > > > you. *
> > > > I won't be posting to you again.
> >
> > > "finally"? * I think I've read all this before.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > fear for him.-
>
> why not keep talking to him until the
> very minute of his psychiatric implosion?

I think that you know the answer to that.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Witlessmongrel growled:

> Why do you think he keeps trolling you as Mistress Jenn?

Gak. Your self-awareness index is still stuck at zero. You should try
something radical to get the needle to budge, like maybe a round of
head-knock therapy.

Or you could continue to portray Usenet's foremost nincompoop. I'll bet that
works for you.

Note for the scorekeeper: Add "troll" to the List Of Words Scottie Doesn't
Understand.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 1, 1:53*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Jan 31, 9:04*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > > >> around you.
> >
> > > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
> >
> > > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
> > > > > intellectual dishonesty.
> >
> > > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > > you do quite often.
> >
> > > > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > > > *In this case, it is "editing" a post.
> >
> > > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
> >
> > > > > > *You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
> >
> > > > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > > > *I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > > whatsoever.
> >
> > > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how
> > > > > rediculous
> > > > > you
> > > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
> >
> > > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
> >
> > > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you
> > > > > to
> > > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
> >
> > > > > Get *more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and
> > > > > the
> > > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible
> > > > > thing
> > > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.
> >
> > > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
> >
> > > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, *but you decided to go for as much
> > > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure
> > > > > that
> > > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
> > > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
> >
> > > > My God, Arny.
> >
> > > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience". *I
> > > > "get" at least part of your problem now. *I'm sorry that I've upset
> > > > you. *
> > > > I won't be posting to you again.
> >
> > > "finally"? * I think I've read all this before.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > fear for him.
>
> Oh brother. Now that's taking usenet far too seriously.
> I fear for you and your fear.
>
> ScottW

You can fear about my caring for Arny as a person all you want. That's
hardly more important than a person's welfare, in my view.

[Boon]

On Feb 1, 2:35�pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 1 Feb, 16:53, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> > �ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Jan 31, 9:04�pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > �"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > > >> around you.
>
> > > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
>
> > > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
> > > > > intellectual dishonesty.
>
> > > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > > you do quite often.
>
> > > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > > �In this case, it is "editing" a post.
>
> > > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
>
> > > > > > �You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments..
>
> > > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > > �I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > > whatsoever.
>
> > > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how rediculous
> > > > > you
> > > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
>
> > > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
>
> > > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you to
> > > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
>
> > > > > Get �more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and the
> > > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible
> > > > > thing
> > > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable..
>
> > > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
>
> > > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, �but you decided to go for as much
> > > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure
> > > > > that
> > > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
> > > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
>
> > > > My God, Arny.
>
> > > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience".. �I
> > > > "get" at least part of your problem now. �I'm sorry that I've upset you. �
> > > > I won't be posting to you again.
>
> > > "finally"? � I think I've read all this before.
>
> > > ScottW
>
> > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. �I've
> > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > fear for him.-
>
> why not keep talking to him until the
> very minute of his psychiatric implosion?-

Because he's been here for 11 years and it hasn't happened yet. It's
already been proven that he freaks out when people ignore him. If we
all were on the same page this time, you might get your wish.

Boon

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 1, 2:38*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > *Clyde Slick > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 1 Feb, 16:53, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On Jan 31, 9:04*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > > > > >> around you.
> >
> > > > > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
> >
> > > > > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > intellectual dishonesty.
> >
> > > > > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > > > > you do quite often.
> >
> > > > > > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > > > > > *In this case, it is "editing" a post.
> >
> > > > > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
> >
> > > > > > > > *You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
> >
> > > > > > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > > > > > *I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > > > > whatsoever.
> >
> > > > > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how
> > > > > > > rediculous
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
> >
> > > > > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
> >
> > > > > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
> >
> > > > > > > Get *more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the
> > > > > > > horrible
> > > > > > > thing
> > > > > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more
> > > > > > > unreasonable.
> >
> > > > > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
> >
> > > > > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, *but you decided to go for as
> > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm
> > > > > > > sure
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
> >
> > > > > > My God, Arny.
> >
> > > > > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road
> > > > > > experience". *I
> > > > > > "get" at least part of your problem now. *I'm sorry that I've upset
> > > > > > you. *
> > > > > > I won't be posting to you again.
> >
> > > > > "finally"? * I think I've read all this before.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > > > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > > > fear for him.-
> >
> > > why not keep talking to him until the
> > > very minute of his psychiatric implosion?
> >
> > I think that you know the answer to that.
>
> You don't want to be responsible.
> Others here will be putting it on their resume if it ever
> comes to pass which I seriously doubt.

Correct. I don't want to be even a bit responsible for a person's
welfare when I have no more influence over that person than I do.

About others: you're probably correct on that too.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > Grrrr. Leads one to believe the George was lower
> > on the food chain until recently.
> > I wonder if he knew?
>
> I don't know what you mean, but, whatever.

What Witless means, Mistress, is that he wants you to discipline him so that
he feels as worthless as Krooger. He's apparently terrified of me, and he
can't understand why you don't hate and fear me as well.

Next time you whale on Scottie, may I suggest using a multi-strand whip that
is fitted with tacks. Scottie doesn't appreciate beatings that he is able to
forget as soon as the next time he goes for walkies.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Woof! <grrrrr!> BARKBARKBARK!

> > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > fear for him.
>
> Oh brother. Now that's taking usenet far too seriously.
> I fear for you and your fear.

My, you're a stupid little cur, aren't you? Woodums wike a biscuit? Roll
over, little doggie! There's a good pooch.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 1, 5:07*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2:55*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > Jenn said:
>
> > > > Grrrr. *Leads one to believe the George was lower
> > > > on the food chain until recently.
> > > > I wonder if he knew?
>
> > > I don't know what you mean, but, whatever.
>
> > What Witless means, Mistress, is that he wants you to discipline him so that
> > he feels as worthless as Krooger. He's apparently terrified of me,
>
> LoL. *Calling you a turd is a sign of fear to you?
> You're a wimp and an anonymous coward.
> They don't come less scary than you.

Yet, according to you, many people are so afraid of George that they
cannot ignore him.

You appear to fall in that category.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 1, 2:52*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Feb 1, 1:53*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On Jan 31, 9:04*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > > > > >> around you.
> >
> > > > > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
> >
> > > > > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > intellectual dishonesty.
> >
> > > > > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > > > > you do quite often.
> >
> > > > > > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > > > > > *In this case, it is "editing" a post.
> >
> > > > > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
> >
> > > > > > > > *You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
> >
> > > > > > > Prove it.
> >
> > > > > > > > *I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > > > > whatsoever.
> >
> > > > > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how
> > > > > > > rediculous
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
> >
> > > > > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
> >
> > > > > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
> >
> > > > > > > Get *more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the
> > > > > > > horrible
> > > > > > > thing
> > > > > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more
> > > > > > > unreasonable.
> >
> > > > > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
> >
> > > > > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, *but you decided to go for as
> > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm
> > > > > > > sure
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
> >
> > > > > > My God, Arny.
> >
> > > > > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road
> > > > > > experience". *I
> > > > > > "get" at least part of your problem now. *I'm sorry that I've upset
> > > > > > you. *
> > > > > > I won't be posting to you again.
> >
> > > > > "finally"? * I think I've read all this before.
> >
> > > > > ScottW
> >
> > > > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > > > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > > > fear for him.
> >
> > > Oh brother. *Now that's taking usenet far too seriously.
> > > I fear for you and your fear.
> >
> > > ScottW
> >
> > You can fear about my caring for Arny as a person all you want.
>
> LoL. So if you really think Arny is about to go over the edge,
> and you really care for Arny as a person,
> what are you going to do about those here who are pushing
> him daily toward the edge?
>
> Stand by and watch I suppose. What a gal.
>
> ScottW

I don't care how much you question my motives or actions Scott.
<poof>

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Looks like somebody's fleas took a lickin'.

> > Woof! <grrrrr!> BARKBARKBARK!
> >
> > > > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > > > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > > > fear for him.
> >
> > > Oh brother. *Now that's taking usenet far too seriously.
> > > I fear for you and your fear.
> >
> > My, you're a stupid little cur, aren't you?
>
> LoL. Now don't go over the edge George.

You're nonsequituring again, Witless. Please stop that.

> I really do care for you as a person.

<yawn>

> Perhaps I should ignore you to preserve your
> well-being.

I'm trying to care what you may or may not do, but I'm not succeeding.

BTW, you've run away from hundreds of direct questions over the years. Does
that make you an "Arnyitis" victim, or just a less refined grade of
pea-brain?

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:04:17 -0800, Jenn > wrote:

>My God, Arny.
>
>I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience". I
>"get" at least part of your problem now. I'm sorry that I've upset you.
>I won't be posting to you again.


The amazing thing, Jenn, is that everyone has to learn this through
their own experience. It's so impossible to grok abstractly. Everyone
that comes here thinks, reasonably, that since they're rational and
wiling to be tolerant, they'll be able to reason and discuss with him.

Even when one understands it, it's still hard to work with. Boon,
IMHO, communicates better than anyone I've ever seen when dealing with
Arnie, but even he gets peevish now and again. JA manages to keep his
temper....most of the time, but, genuinely, George really has it
right.

There's no possibility of reason, no possibility of conversation, no
possibility of ordinary human discourse. The problem, then, is that
Arnie is like a gas: he expands to fill thre available volume....in
this case RAO.

Sooner or later, he forces himself inside the most innocuous
conversations and Presto! Chango! It's all about him.

Herbert

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:17:20 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>Like I told Marc, its too bad that you guys have such lousy lives that you
>sit here on RAO for hours, waiting for a post by me to pounce on.
>Meanwhile, I enjoy life in places you never go because of your devotion to
>Middiocy.


::would post something but is too busy choking and
sputtering excellent whisky that would otherwise have been
delightfully sliding on my throat when I came across Arnie's superb
pronouncement::

Herbert

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
Jenn > wrote:

> In article
> >,
> Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On 1 Feb, 16:53, Jenn > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > >,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > On Jan 31, 9:04*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > In article >,
> > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > >
> > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > > > >> around you.
> > >
> > > > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
> > >
> > > > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > intellectual dishonesty.
> > >
> > > > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > > > you do quite often.
> > >
> > > > > > Prove it.
> > >
> > > > > > > *In this case, it is "editing" a post.
> > >
> > > > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
> > >
> > > > > > > *You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
> > >
> > > > > > Prove it.
> > >
> > > > > > > *I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > > > whatsoever.
> > >
> > > > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how
> > > > > > rediculous
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
> > >
> > > > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
> > >
> > > > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
> > >
> > > > > > Get *more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the
> > > > > > horrible
> > > > > > thing
> > > > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.
> > >
> > > > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
> > >
> > > > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, *but you decided to go for as much
> > > > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm
> > > > > > sure
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
> > >
> > > > > My God, Arny.
> > >
> > > > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience".
> > > > > *I
> > > > > "get" at least part of your problem now. *I'm sorry that I've upset
> > > > > you. *
> > > > > I won't be posting to you again.
> > >
> > > > "finally"? * I think I've read all this before.
> > >
> > > > ScottW
> > >
> > > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > > fear for him.-
> >
> > why not keep talking to him until the
> > very minute of his psychiatric implosion?
>
> I think that you know the answer to that.

He's bounced back every time he seemed close to losing it completely.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> I fear for you and your fear.

I fear your fear of her fear.

Stephen

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:21:22 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"George M. Middius" > wrote in
>message
>
>> Arnii is a self-proclaimed "master of the debating
>> trade". That means he gets to do whatever he wants, and
>> all of us non-"masters" are merely pawns in his private
>> game.
>
>Obviously Middiot, you have no idea that RAO is available to the general
>public. Nothing private about RAO at all.
>
>Middiot, you cower behind an alias, because you know the redicule you'd
>receive if people who know you in real life knew that being the Middiot is
>what you do with so much of your life.
>
>If Jenn does as she has promised, and stops posting responses to or about
>me, then that will be a significant victory for me.

My Gawd, Arnie, you've really lost it this time. Being excommunicated
doesn't mean that you've won, lonely breath.

It means you're on the Untouchable list. Next I suppose you'd
think being exposed on a mountain side is a signal of parental love
and affection.

Herbert

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:40:43 -0800, Jenn > wrote:

>In article
>,
> Boon > wrote:
>>
>> If everyone wants to try ignoring Arny again, I'm all for it. It's
>> one thing to torment an asshole, but Arny has clearly gone way past
>> that point and the tormenting has taken on a new dimension. I think
>> we've seen plenty of evidence over the last few weeks that Arny is
>> mentally ill. We may have to start considering the fact that pushing
>> a mentally ill person too far may have consequences.
>
>That's my point of bowing out of discussion with him. Something finally
>hit me tonight about his mental state. I believe that he is unstable,
>and therefore, A. Trying to make him see reality is probably fruitless,
>and B. He could be headed down a very bad road, and I don't want to be
>part of what could be happening.

This is nothing new. He and we've been here before. I think you're
misreading this. I'll agree there must have been a significant
stimulus or provocation to send him off like this, but he feeds on the
attention. It distracts him from whatever real problem (s) he needs to
face.

Eventually, his real-life paralysis will lead to a decision being made
about something passively: that is,by not deciding he's deciding.
While he's becoming logorheic here, the real world will go on and
things will happen. Once that's happened, Arnie can recover his more
normal outward-facing role (note I didn't say "self") and things will
go back to the previous level.

If you think about it a bit, you'll see that's why he has no real job
and no real career.

At least, that's my humble theory, heretofore to be known as IMHT.
Please feel free to generously critique.

Herbert

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:46:12 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>Which of course you are not doing, Jenn. You're just pretending that you are
>bowing out of discussion of me by discussing me with someone else. They are
>just a surrogate for me. You are still mulling me over in your mind again
>and again.
>
>What you are doing Jenn is perfectly transparent, and very much what a silly
>middle school girl would do.

Keep your fantasies out of this, Arnold.

Herbert

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Feb, 17:38, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 1 Feb, 16:53, Jenn > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > >,
>
> > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > On Jan 31, 9:04*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > In article >,
> > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > >
> > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > > > >> around you.
>
> > > > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
>
> > > > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
> > > > > > intellectual dishonesty.
>
> > > > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > > > you do quite often.
>
> > > > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > > > *In this case, it is "editing" a post.
>
> > > > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
>
> > > > > > > *You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
>
> > > > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > > > *I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > > > whatsoever.
>
> > > > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how
> > > > > > rediculous
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
>
> > > > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
>
> > > > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
>
> > > > > > Get *more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible
> > > > > > thing
> > > > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.
>
> > > > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
>
> > > > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, *but you decided to go for as much
> > > > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
> > > > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
>
> > > > > My God, Arny.
>
> > > > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience". *I
> > > > > "get" at least part of your problem now. *I'm sorry that I've upset
> > > > > you. *
> > > > > I won't be posting to you again.
>
> > > > "finally"? * I think I've read all this before.
>
> > > > ScottW
>
> > > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > > fear for him.-
>
> > why not keep talking to him until the
> > very minute of his psychiatric implosion?
>
> I think that you know the answer to that.-

uhhh, spooge on your screen?

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
Herbert Hoover > wrote:

> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:40:43 -0800, Jenn > wrote:
>
> >In article
> >,
> > Boon > wrote:
> >>
> >> If everyone wants to try ignoring Arny again, I'm all for it. It's
> >> one thing to torment an asshole, but Arny has clearly gone way past
> >> that point and the tormenting has taken on a new dimension. I think
> >> we've seen plenty of evidence over the last few weeks that Arny is
> >> mentally ill. We may have to start considering the fact that pushing
> >> a mentally ill person too far may have consequences.
> >
> >That's my point of bowing out of discussion with him. Something finally
> >hit me tonight about his mental state. I believe that he is unstable,
> >and therefore, A. Trying to make him see reality is probably fruitless,
> >and B. He could be headed down a very bad road, and I don't want to be
> >part of what could be happening.
>
> This is nothing new. He and we've been here before. I think you're
> misreading this. I'll agree there must have been a significant
> stimulus or provocation to send him off like this, but he feeds on the
> attention. It distracts him from whatever real problem (s) he needs to
> face.

I agree with this. But... If I'm right, I don't want to contribute to
what could be something serious for him, and if YOU'RE right about
feeding on the attention, it's ALSO best for me (and others) to not
contribute to that. Either way, this feels like the correct move. We
might both be right here.

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Feb, 17:50, ScottW > wrote:

> Others here will be putting it on their resume if it ever
> comes to pass which I seriously doubt.
>
> ScottW-


only those of us aspiring to careers as debating traders

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:16:33 -0600, MiNe 109
> wrote:
(snipped for lucidity)

>He's bounced back every time he seemed close to losing it completely.
>
>Stephen

Exactly.

Of course, we're still accountable for what we choose to do
regardless of anything else.

Herbert

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:06:28 -0800, Jenn > wrote:

>In article >,
> Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:40:43 -0800, Jenn > wrote:
>>
>> >In article
>> >,
>> > Boon > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If everyone wants to try ignoring Arny again, I'm all for it. It's
>> >> one thing to torment an asshole, but Arny has clearly gone way past
>> >> that point and the tormenting has taken on a new dimension. I think
>> >> we've seen plenty of evidence over the last few weeks that Arny is
>> >> mentally ill. We may have to start considering the fact that pushing
>> >> a mentally ill person too far may have consequences.
>> >
>> >That's my point of bowing out of discussion with him. Something finally
>> >hit me tonight about his mental state. I believe that he is unstable,
>> >and therefore, A. Trying to make him see reality is probably fruitless,
>> >and B. He could be headed down a very bad road, and I don't want to be
>> >part of what could be happening.
>>
>> This is nothing new. He and we've been here before. I think you're
>> misreading this. I'll agree there must have been a significant
>> stimulus or provocation to send him off like this, but he feeds on the
>> attention. It distracts him from whatever real problem (s) he needs to
>> face.
>
>I agree with this. But... If I'm right, I don't want to contribute to
>what could be something serious for him, and if YOU'RE right about
>feeding on the attention, it's ALSO best for me (and others) to not
>contribute to that. Either way, this feels like the correct move. We
>might both be right here.

Oh, no, actually,. You're the one who's right, Jenn, not me. I'm not
actually arguing with you. I believe you're ethically correct.

However, Arnie long ago destroyed RAO to the point where its only
raison d'etre is to bash Krueger, since he contaminates everything
within reach, the original Usenet Bunker Buster.

I've long ago learned that in general, bashing Krueger remains one of
life's great pleasures as long as one recognizes it for the Jones that
it might become. My solution is to stay away for *years* at a time.

Here I am, back after the metaphorical millenium (and also the real
one) and plus ca change, plus ca meme chose. It's the same crap all
over again.

That's why I'm so respectful of George. He's got it right, and once
you accept that, his writing becomes funnier and funnier, even if he
does have a penchant for saying outrageous things to others who may or
may not deserve it. He plays RAO the same way Arnie plays it, only
George gets it and Arnie doesn't.

So excuse me for now. I've read all your posts recently, and you know
what you're about and I have some Arnie bashing to do. Arnie will find
you wherever you are. You may filter him, but it will be *very* hard
not to occasionally peek and then you'll read something so awful, so
off the wall, so psychotically mean you'll have to respond because
(caps intended) THIS STUFF STAYS ON THE WEB FOREVER!!!!!!

In the same way that Democrats finally learned that they have
to respond immediately to any and all Republican smears (and
vice-versa, of course), you can't let Arnie's malign spewings stay
unanswered on the web.

So, you either leave RAO (which will shut him up eventually,
and since you left, you won;t see the hideous things he may have said
in your absence) or you fight.

Personally, I prefer both paths. Leave for a good while, then
come back a la George and blow the buggy ******* out of the water.

Herbert

[Clyde Slick]

On 1 Feb, 18:29, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2:52*pm, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Feb 1, 1:53*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
>
> > > > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > On Jan 31, 9:04*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >> Yes Jenn, you get snapped to attention every time your
> > > > > > > >> attention starts wavering and you lapse into Middiocy.
> > > > > > > >> That's what happens to people who get seduced by the
> > > > > > > >> Middiot. Look at the pathetic other examples of that
> > > > > > > >> around you.
>
> > > > > > > > This is exactly what I was referring to earlier, Arny.
>
> > > > > > > Yes Jenn, you get really testy when caught in a clear cut example of
> > > > > > > intellectual dishonesty.
>
> > > > > > > > You regularly through a bitch fit about something that
> > > > > > > > you do quite often.
>
> > > > > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > > > > *In this case, it is "editing" a post.
>
> > > > > > > No Jenn, its a total trashing by you of a serious comment.
>
> > > > > > > > *You've done that a lot in order to make fake arguments.
>
> > > > > > > Prove it.
>
> > > > > > > > *I did it in an honest attempt to get into an
> > > > > > > > audio discussion with you, without any rancour
> > > > > > > > whatsoever.
>
> > > > > > > It was obvious intellectual dishonest. I didn't realize how
> > > > > > > rediculous
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > were being until I went back and looked at my OP.
>
> > > > > > > > What possible dastardly deed do you claim
> > > > > > > > that I was attempting by simply trimming a post?
>
> > > > > > > Creating an opportunity to whine about big bad Arny when I called you
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > task for such an obvious example of deception.
>
> > > > > > > Get *more praise from the Middiot Posse ( posts by Art, ****R, and
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > Middiot himself follow your post, each consoling you for the horrible
> > > > > > > thing
> > > > > > > I did to you and encouraging you to become even more unreasonable.
>
> > > > > > > > A simple answer would have sufficed.
>
> > > > > > > I gave you that in the OP Jenn, *but you decided to go for as much
> > > > > > > consolation and praise as you could from those listed above. I'm sure
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > eventually Marc will chime in. You're a hero to them and you like the
> > > > > > > feeling of "being one of the boys".
>
> > > > > > My God, Arny.
>
> > > > > > I guess that I've finally had a bit of a "Damascus road experience". *I
> > > > > > "get" at least part of your problem now. *I'm sorry that I've upset
> > > > > > you. *
> > > > > > I won't be posting to you again.
>
> > > > > "finally"? * I think I've read all this before.
>
> > > > > ScottW
>
> > > > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > > > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > > > fear for him.
>
> > > Oh brother. *Now that's taking usenet far too seriously.
> > > I fear for you and your fear.
>
> > > ScottW
>
> > You can fear about my caring for Arny as a person all you want.
>
> LoL. So if you really think Arny is about to go over the edge,
> and you really care for Arny as a person,
> what are you going to do about those here who are pushing
> him daily toward the edge?
>
> Stand by and watch I suppose. What a gal.
>

he has to hit his bottom, before he will acquire the
self awareness necessary for his recovery.
We are helping him find his bottom.

http://newmedia.funnyjunk.com/pictures/Rock_Bottom.jpg

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
Herbert Hoover > wrote:

> On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:16:33 -0600, MiNe 109
> > wrote:
> (snipped for lucidity)
>
> >He's bounced back every time he seemed close to losing it completely.
> >
> >Stephen
>
> Exactly.
>
> Of course, we're still accountable for what we choose to do
> regardless of anything else.

If nothing we do matters, then all that matters is what we do.

-Tim Minear "Epiphany" Angel.

Stephen

[Boon]

On Feb 1, 4:10�pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>
> Even when one understands it, it's still hard to work with. Boon,
> IMHO, communicates better than anyone I've ever seen when dealing with
> Arnie, but even he gets peevish now and again.

Damn, and I was finally starting to embrace "caustic."

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > Even when one understands it, it's still hard to work with. Boon,
> > IMHO, communicates better than anyone I've ever seen when dealing with
> > Arnie, but even he gets peevish now and again.
>
> Damn, and I was finally starting to embrace "caustic."

Don't worry about it. Arnii is supremely fecal but little else.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message


> I think that you know the answer to that.

The answer is that you finally realized what a whopper you got caught
telling Jenn, and you decided to take your ball and bat and go home.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

>
> Correct. I don't want to be even a bit responsible for a
> person's welfare when I have no more influence over that
> person than I do.


Jenn, your ability to influence me was zilch from the onset and went down
hill rapidly after that. Your relationship with the Middiot was very, very
clear.

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:07:45 -0800 (PST), Boon >
wrote:

>On Feb 1, 4:10?pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>>
>> Even when one understands it, it's still hard to work with. Boon,
>> IMHO, communicates better than anyone I've ever seen when dealing with
>> Arnie, but even he gets peevish now and again.
>
>Damn, and I was finally starting to embrace "caustic."
>
>Boon

Keep the ole chin up, Boon. You just need to move a little further
down the line. May I suggest a dash of vitriol with the perception? It
adds a certain je ne sais quoi

Herbert

[Boon]

On Feb 2, 4:59�am, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:07:45 -0800 (PST), Boon >
> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 1, 4:10?pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>
> >> Even when one understands it, it's still hard to work with. Boon,
> >> IMHO, communicates better than anyone I've ever seen when dealing with
> >> Arnie, but even he gets peevish now and again.
>
> >Damn, and I was finally starting to embrace "caustic."
>
> >Boon
>
> Keep the ole chin up, Boon. You just need to move a little further
> down the line. May I suggest a dash of vitriol with the perception? It
> adds a certain je ne sais quoi
>
> � � � � � � � � � � � � Herbert

The Devil said he used to like the way I projected the threat of
physical violence, as if I was always just one step away from flying
to Detroit and kicking Arny's ass all over his front lawn. He said it
a little more eloquently, of course.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message


> The Devil said he used to like the way I projected the
> threat of physical violence, as if I was always just one
> step away from flying to Detroit and kicking Arny's ass
> all over his front lawn. He said it a little more
> eloquently, of course.

Just more evidence that both of you are basically thugs. Well "both" if in
fact you are different people.

[Boon]

On Feb 2, 7:21�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > The Devil said he used to like the way I projected the
> > threat of physical violence, as if I was always just one
> > step away from flying to Detroit and kicking Arny's ass
> > all over his front lawn. �He said it a little more
> > eloquently, of course.
>
> Just more evidence that both of you are basically thugs. Well "both" if in
> fact you are different people.

Ah, more paranoia. Your narcissism has been so dominant in the last
few weeks that I missed it. Let's put it this way...I drove right
past your house in 2001 without bothering you. But if we ever meet in
person, you will be held accountable for the lies you've told about me
and my family. Every one.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message


> But if we ever meet in person, you will
> be held accountable for the lies you've told about me and
> my family. Every one.

At that time Marc will be happy to hold you accountable for all of your
abominable lies you've told about my family, especially the ones about
"dead****", and the ones where you were happy to report that you and your
friends call my wife the..."*********".

[Boon]

On Feb 2, 8:28�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > But if we ever meet in person, you will
> > be held accountable for the lies you've told about me and
> > my family. �Every one.
>
> At that time Marc �will be happy to hold you accountable for all of your
> abominable lies you've told about my family, especially the ones about
> "dead****", �and the ones where you were happy to report that you and your
> friends call my wife the..."*********".

It's on.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Feb 2, 8:28?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> But if we ever meet in person, you will
>>> be held accountable for the lies you've told about me
>>> and my family. ?Every one.
>>
>> At that time Marc ?will be happy to hold you accountable
>> for all of your abominable lies you've told about my
>> family, especially the ones about "dead****", ?and the
>> ones where you were happy to report that you and your
>> friends call my wife the..."*********".
>
> It's on.

I can fearlessly predict that it will never happen, as long has you have
legs to run away from me, Marc.

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 07:19:21 -0800 (PST), Boon >
wrote:

>On Feb 2, 4:59?am, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:07:45 -0800 (PST), Boon >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Feb 1, 4:10?pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>>
>> >> Even when one understands it, it's still hard to work with. Boon,
>> >> IMHO, communicates better than anyone I've ever seen when dealing with
>> >> Arnie, but even he gets peevish now and again.
>>
>> >Damn, and I was finally starting to embrace "caustic."
>>
>> >Boon
>>
>> Keep the ole chin up, Boon. You just need to move a little further
>> down the line. May I suggest a dash of vitriol with the perception? It
>> adds a certain je ne sais quoi
>>
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Herbert
>
>The Devil said he used to like the way I projected the threat of
>physical violence, as if I was always just one step away from flying
>to Detroit and kicking Arny's ass all over his front lawn. He said it
>a little more eloquently, of course.
>
>Boon


Graham had a certain way with words, didn't he? He was right. There
was a subtle menace to some of your earlier postings. That might have
actually been there, or it might have just been a mater of style.

Of course, 10 years later or so and not a smashed knuckle in sight
tends to undermine the possibilities.

Herbert

[Herbert Hoover[_2_]]

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:21:11 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:

>"Boon" > wrote in message

>
>> The Devil said he used to like the way I projected the
>> threat of physical violence, as if I was always just one
>> step away from flying to Detroit and kicking Arny's ass
>> all over his front lawn. He said it a little more
>> eloquently, of course.
>
>Just more evidence that both of you are basically thugs. Well "both" if in
>fact you are different people.
>

Damn!

You're right.

I am Boon.

Herbert

[Arny Krueger]

"Herbert Hoover" > wrote in message


> Of course, 10 years later or so and not a smashed knuckle
> in sight tends to undermine the possibilities.


At Marc's actual level of capabilities for physical violence, a toilet paper
barrage would be far more extreme than one could reasonably expect.

[ScottW]

On Feb 1, 4:02*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Looks like somebody's fleas took a lickin'.
>
> > > Woof! <grrrrr!> BARKBARKBARK!
>
> > > > > Yes, I tried to swear off before, but this is a bit different. *I've
> > > > > seen something in him lately that truly make me sorry for him and have
> > > > > fear for him.
>
> > > > Oh brother. *Now that's taking usenet far too seriously.
> > > > I fear for you and your fear.
>
> > > My, you're a stupid little cur, aren't you?
>
> > LoL. *Now don't go over the edge George.
>
> You're nonsequituring again, Witless. Please stop that.
>
> > I really do care for you as a person.
>
> <yawn>

Ok, so you're not a person.
I'll still care for you.

>
> > Perhaps I should ignore you to preserve your
> > well-being.
>
> I'm trying to care what you may or may not do, but I'm not succeeding.

But still you persist. Should I wonder why?
I don't think you know why.

>
> BTW, you've run away from hundreds of direct questions over the years. Does
> that make you an "Arnyitis" *victim, or just a less refined grade of
> pea-brain?

None of the above. It makes me a normal person with the freedom to
ignore
the rantings of lunatics.

ScottW

[ScottW]

On Feb 1, 4:17*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > I fear for you and your fear.
>
> I fear your fear of her fear.

You've always been fearful.

ScottW

[ScottW]

On Feb 1, 6:09*pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:06:28 -0800, Jenn > wrote:
> >In article >,
> > Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:40:43 -0800, Jenn > wrote:
>
> >> >In article
> >> >,
> >> > Boon > wrote:
>
> >> >> If everyone wants to try ignoring Arny again, I'm all for it. *It's
> >> >> one thing to torment an asshole, but Arny has clearly gone way past
> >> >> that point and the tormenting has taken on a new dimension. *I think
> >> >> we've seen plenty of evidence over the last few weeks that Arny is
> >> >> mentally ill. *We may have to start considering the fact that pushing
> >> >> a mentally ill person too far may have consequences.
>
> >> >That's my point of bowing out of discussion with him. *Something finally
> >> >hit me tonight about his mental state. *I believe that he is unstable,
> >> >and therefore, A. *Trying to make him see reality is probably fruitless,
> >> >and B. *He could be headed down a very bad road, and I don't want to be
> >> >part of what could be happening.
>
> >> This is nothing new. He and we've been here before. I think you're
> >> misreading this. I'll agree there must have been a significant
> >> stimulus or provocation to send him off like this, but he feeds on the
> >> attention. It distracts him from whatever real problem (s) he needs to
> >> face.
>
> >I agree with this. *But... If I'm right, I don't want to contribute to
> >what could be something serious for him, and if YOU'RE right about
> >feeding on the attention, it's ALSO best for me (and others) to not
> >contribute to that. *Either way, this feels like the correct move. *We
> >might both be right here.
>
> Oh, no, actually,. You're the one who's right, Jenn, not me. I'm not
> actually arguing with you. I believe you're ethically correct.
>
> However, Arnie long ago destroyed RAO to the point where its only
> raison d'etre is to bash Krueger, since he contaminates everything
> within reach, the original Usenet Bunker Buster.

How weak are those that allow Arny to dominate them?
That is the most BS excuse for RAO becoming the
kitty litter. Arny is the excuse, not the cause.

When Arny takes his breaks, Middiot cries over his
absence.

>
> I've long ago learned that in general, bashing Krueger remains one of
> life's great pleasures as long as one recognizes it for the Jones that
> it might become. My solution is to stay away for *years* at a time.

Thanks for proving my point.

>
> Here I am, back after the metaphorical millenium (and also the real
> one) and plus ca change, plus ca meme chose. It's the same crap all
> over again.
>
> That's why I'm so respectful of George. He's got it right,

Got what right? Arny addiction for life eternal?
How do you get that right?

> and once
> you accept that, his writing becomes funnier and funnier, even if he
> does have a penchant for saying outrageous things to others who may or
> may not deserve it.

I see, your selfish amusement at the expense of others takes
precedent for you. Pathetic.

> He plays RAO the same way Arnie plays it, only
> George gets it and Arnie doesn't.

Players all. The whole audio industry appears to be consumed by
players. Certainly the fringe parasites of the review industry.

>
> So excuse me for now. I've read all your posts recently, and you know
> what you're about and I have some Arnie bashing to do. Arnie will find
> you wherever you are. You may filter him, but it will be *very* hard
> not to occasionally peek and then you'll read something so awful, so
> off the wall, so psychotically mean you'll have to respond because
> (caps intended) THIS STUFF STAYS ON THE WEB FOREVER!!!!!!

LoL. OMG, that will be shocking to some moronic historian
a millenia or two in the future.
>
> * * * * In the same way that Democrats finally learned that they have
> to respond immediately to any and all Republican smears (and
> vice-versa, of course),

How many democrats don't pay their taxes and can still
get a high paying job in government?

> you can't let Arnie's malign spewings stay
> unanswered on the web.

Yes, she can. It's easy.


>
> * * * * So, you either leave RAO (which will shut him up eventually,
> and since you left, you won;t see the hideous things he may have said
> in your absence) or you fight.

I see. You just want Jenn to keep amusing you.

>
> * * * * Personally, I prefer both paths. Leave for a good while, then
> come back a la George and blow the buggy ******* out of the water.

Instead you're actually just blowing the *******. He likes it.

ScottW

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 1, 4:17*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > I fear for you and your fear.
> >
> > I fear your fear of her fear.
>
> You've always been fearful.

All I have to fear is fear itself. That, and your fear of her fear.

Stephen

[ScottW]

On Feb 2, 12:03*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > On Feb 1, 4:17 pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > >,
>
> > > ScottW > wrote:
> > > > I fear for you and your fear.
>
> > > I fear your fear of her fear.
>
> > You've always been fearful.
>
> All I have to fear is fear itself. That, and your fear of her fear.

Just look at the emotional meltdown Jenn started.
That women has turned you into a wreck.

ScottW

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> > * * * * Personally, I prefer both paths. Leave for a good while, then
> > come back a la George and blow the buggy ******* out of the water.
>
> Instead you're actually just blowing the *******. He likes it.

All apologies, Herbert, Scott gets 'everybody's gay' when disagreed with.

Stephen

[ScottW]

On Feb 2, 12:09*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > > * * * * Personally, I prefer both paths. Leave for a good while, then
> > > come back a la George and blow the buggy ******* out of the water.
>
> > *Instead you're actually just blowing the *******. *He likes it.
>
> All apologies, Herbert, Scott gets 'everybody's gay' when disagreed with.

Why is the obvious always beyond your grasp?

ScottW

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 2, 12:03*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > On Feb 1, 4:17 pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > >,
> >
> > > > ScottW > wrote:
> > > > > I fear for you and your fear.
> >
> > > > I fear your fear of her fear.
> >
> > > You've always been fearful.
> >
> > All I have to fear is fear itself. That, and your fear of her fear.
>
> Just look at the emotional meltdown Jenn started.

Where?

> That women has turned you into a wreck.

http://www.iamtrex.com/

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 2, 12:09*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > > * * * * Personally, I prefer both paths. Leave for a good while, then
> > > > come back a la George and blow the buggy ******* out of the water.
> >
> > > *Instead you're actually just blowing the *******. *He likes it.
> >
> > All apologies, Herbert, Scott gets 'everybody's gay' when disagreed with.
>
> Why is the obvious always beyond your grasp?

I nailed this one.

Stephen

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:03:31 -0600, MiNe 109
> wrote:

>In article
>,
> ScottW > wrote:
>
>> On Feb 1, 4:17*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
>> > In article
>> > >,
>> >
>> > *ScottW > wrote:
>> > > I fear for you and your fear.
>> >
>> > I fear your fear of her fear.
>>
>> You've always been fearful.
>
>All I have to fear is fear itself. That, and your fear of her fear.
>
>Stephen

Don't forget my fear of your fear of her fear

Herbert

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
Herbert Hoover > wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:03:31 -0600, MiNe 109
> > wrote:
>
> >In article
> >,
> > ScottW > wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 1, 4:17*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> >> > In article
> >> > >,
> >> >
> >> > *ScottW > wrote:
> >> > > I fear for you and your fear.
> >> >
> >> > I fear your fear of her fear.
> >>
> >> You've always been fearful.
> >
> >All I have to fear is fear itself. That, and your fear of her fear.
> >
> >Stephen
>
> Don't forget my fear of your fear of her fear
>
> Herbert

I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 1:24*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 1, 4:17*pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
> > In article
> > >,
>
> > *ScottW > wrote:
> > > I fear for you and your fear.
>
> > I fear your fear of her fear.
>
> You've always been fearful.

Projection on 2pid's part.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 5:15*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
>
> Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.

Is this our first fight? LOL!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 1:37*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 1, 6:09*pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:

> > That's why I'm so respectful of George. He's got it right,
>
> Got what right? *Arny addiction for life eternal?
> How do you get that right?

And then there is 2pid, who is addicted to pointing out others'
"addiction".

Which is, of course, somehow 'superior' in his 'mind'.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 2:09*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
> *ScottW > wrote:
> > > * * * * Personally, I prefer both paths. Leave for a good while, then
> > > come back a la George and blow the buggy ******* out of the water.
>
> > *Instead you're actually just blowing the *******. *He likes it.
>
> All apologies, Herbert, Scott gets 'everybody's gay' when disagreed with.

LOL!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
> >
> > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
>
> Is this our first fight? LOL!

I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for Stephen.
His "posse" dues are unpaid, so he gets no perks.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
> > >
> > > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
> >
> > Is this our first fight? LOL!
>
> I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for Stephen.
> His "posse" dues are unpaid, so he gets no perks.

*I* didn't disable the PayPal button for the dues.

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

> > > > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
> > > >
> > > > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
> > >
> > > Is this our first fight? LOL!
> >
> > I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for Stephen.
> > His "posse" dues are unpaid, so he gets no perks.
>
> *I* didn't disable the PayPal button for the dues.

Are you saying the invoice "lied" to you? ;-)

[ScottW]

On Feb 2, 2:47*pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
> And Scott.....you're still here shrieking imprecations and platitudes
> and unable to act on any of it for your own betterment.

Another fool who thinks RAO is a reflection of reality.
>
> Face it, Scott, no one treats you as a serious player.

Because I don't play.

> You
> re not as deranged as Arnie, and you're not smart enough for most of
> the other clever folk to pay much attention.

Ahhh, the childish repetition. Tell me, how smart must
one be to tell which cats are soiling the litter box?

> Yet you're still
> here...Ahhh but there's a small Krueger in all of us waiting to get
> out, right, Scott?

Perhaps in you. Time to pack it away for another extended
hiatus.

>
> The point is that any conversation with Arnie is, by definition, nutso
> berserko, oingo-boingo crackers, so the issue is just what, exactly,
> is your point here?

That Arny is stale dung compared the foul stench of your odor.

>
> As for my "selfish amusement"....why precisely so, dear boy. You've
> hit the nail on the head for at least once in your impoverished life,
> just as Arnie's contribution are for his own "selfish amusement" as
> well.

With your empowerment, he powers on. The likes of you
and George will mourn his passing.

>
> Of course, for him this is all potentially life-wrecking and
> life-threatening,

LoL. Another absurd presumption.

> but even psychotics have occasional moments of
> terrifying lucidity when they realize the truth.
>
> What a maroon!

and a top poster no less.

ScottW

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
MiNe 109 > wrote:

> In article >,
> George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > Shhhh! said:
> >
> > > > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
> > > >
> > > > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
> > >
> > > Is this our first fight? LOL!
> >
> > I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for Stephen.
> > His "posse" dues are unpaid, so he gets no perks.
>
> *I* didn't disable the PayPal button for the dues.
>
> Stephen

I tried to send a money order, but George rejected it. Drats. I so
wanted to donate to The Cause.

[ScottW]

On Feb 2, 6:24*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
> *MiNe 109 * > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article >,
> > *George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > Shhhh! said:
>
> > > > > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
>
> > > > > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
>
> > > > Is this our first fight? LOL!
>
> > > I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for Stephen.
> > > His "posse" dues are unpaid, so he gets no perks.
>
> > *I* didn't disable the PayPal button for the dues.
>
> > Stephen
>
> I tried to send a money order, but George rejected it. *Drats. *I so
> wanted to donate to The Cause.

Jenn seeks membership in the club of demeaners.
Good job girl. Is this something that would make your daddy proud?

ScottW

[Clyde Slick]

On 2 Feb, 11:28, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > But if we ever meet in person, you will
> > be held accountable for the lies you've told about me and
> > my family. *Every one.
>
> At that time Marc *will be happy to hold you accountable for all of your
> abominable lies you've told about my family, especially the ones about
> "dead****", *and the ones where you were happy to report that you and your
> friends call my wife the..."*********".

Dead Nate
Back alley whore

[Clyde Slick]

On 2 Feb, 11:53, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:


>
> At Marc's actual level of capabilities for physical violence, a toilet paper
> barrage would be far more extreme than one could reasonably expect.


what do you expect, $1,000 checks?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Witless whines and scratches at the door.

> > I tried to send a money order, but George rejected it. *Drats. *I so
> > wanted to donate to The Cause.
>
> Jenn seeks membership in the club of demeaners.
> Good job girl. Is this something that would make your daddy proud?

Scottie, insofar as there could be a "posse", one of its chief objectives
would be to reduce you to tears. Why on earth would you want to join in?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 7:13*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
>
> > > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
>
> > Is this our first fight? LOL!
>
> I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for Stephen.
> His "posse" dues are unpaid, so he gets no perks.

Thank you. I'm awaiting further Posse instructions.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 8:34*pm, ScottW > wrote:

> *Jenn seeks membership in the club of demeaners.
> *Good job girl. *Is this something that would make your daddy proud?

Here is further evidence of 2pid's "Jenn addiction".

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

> > "dead****", *and the ones where you were happy to report that you and your
> > friends call my wife the..."*********".
>
> Dead Nate
> Back alley whore

Yes, throw that one in. Actually, that was Arnii's own description
originally. It would have lived forever in posterity if ChickenBorg hadn't
pleaded with Goggle™ to excise it from the archive.

[ScottW]

On Feb 2, 7:01*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Witless whines and scratches at the door.
>
> > > I tried to send a money order, but George rejected it. *Drats. *I so
> > > wanted to donate to The Cause.
>
> > *Jenn seeks membership in the club of demeaners.
> > *Good job girl. *Is this something that would make your daddy proud?
>
> Scottie, insofar as there could be a "posse", one of its chief objectives
> would be to reduce you to tears. Why on earth would you want to join in?

George proves once again that reading comprehension and writing
skills do not always correlate.

ScottW

[ScottW]

On Feb 2, 7:02*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 7:13*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > Shhhh! said:
>
> > > > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
>
> > > > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
>
> > > Is this our first fight? LOL!
>
> > I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for Stephen.

[ScottW]

On Feb 2, 4:56*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 1:37*pm, ScottW > wrote:
>
> > On Feb 1, 6:09*pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
> > > That's why I'm so respectful of George. He's got it right,
>
> > Got what right? *Arny addiction for life eternal?
> > How do you get that right?
>
> And then there is 2pid, who is addicted to pointing out others'
> "addiction".
>
> Which is, of course, somehow 'superior' in his 'mind'.

IKYABWAI is strictly fordbidden in the hive.
Expect your training shock to arrive shortly.

ScottW

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Feb 2, 6:24*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *MiNe 109 * > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > In article >,
> > > *George M. Middius > wrote:
> >
> > > > Shhhh! said:
> >
> > > > > > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
> >
> > > > > > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
> >
> > > > > Is this our first fight? LOL!
> >
> > > > I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for
> > > > Stephen.
> > > > His "posse" dues are unpaid, so he gets no perks.
> >
> > > *I* didn't disable the PayPal button for the dues.
> >
> > > Stephen
> >
> > I tried to send a money order, but George rejected it. *Drats. *I so
> > wanted to donate to The Cause.
>
> Jenn seeks membership in the club of demeaners.
> Good job girl. Is this something that would make your daddy proud?
>
> ScottW

<<whoosh>>

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > > I tried to send a money order, but George rejected it. *Drats. *I so
> > > wanted to donate to The Cause.
> >
> > Jenn seeks membership in the club of demeaners.
> > Good job girl. Is this something that would make your daddy proud?

> <<whoosh>>

Scottie thinks that by demonstrating his own inability to recognize mockery,
he'll somehow make the Krooborg seem less insane.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > > > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
> > > > >
> > > > > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
> > > >
> > > > Is this our first fight? LOL!
> > >
> > > I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for Stephen.
> > > His "posse" dues are unpaid, so he gets no perks.
> >
> > *I* didn't disable the PayPal button for the dues.
>
> Are you saying the invoice "lied" to you? ;-)

Damn. If you can't trust the internet...

Stephen

[Iain Churches[_2_]]

"Jenn" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>> The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find
>
> What recording was that?

Probably Walter Carlos with synthesized trumpets
and French horns.

[Arny Krueger]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 2 Feb, 11:53, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>>
>> At Marc's actual level of capabilities for physical
>> violence, a toilet paper barrage would be far more
>> extreme than one could reasonably expect.

> what do you expect, $1,000 checks?

From you?

Not unless you were good at graft. ;-)

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Witless mocks himself and doesn't have the self-awareness to take credit.

> I really don't care how low [George the Great] and [Prince Shhhh] go to insult me.
> They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent persons respect.

Sometimes your pithiness is breathtaking, Scooter. Are you even dimly aware
of how you eviscerate your own self-righteous crapola through your own
words?

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:03:35 -0800, Jenn
> wrote:

(snipped for brevity)

>> I really don't care how low the Middiot and Shhtards go to insult me.
>> They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent persons respect.
>> But I told you long ago that you infatuation with Arny will lead you
>> to emulate Middiot if you're not careful.
>> Apparently you're oblivious to what happenned to you.
>
>Oh, I get it. Let's recap:
>1. Arny says that I'm in the posse, in spite of my continual denial and
>in spite of my continual expression of distaste at how George does what
>he does.
>2. You also believe that I'm "in" with them or at least a "wannabe" in
>spite of the above.
>3. You group me in with them because I don't object enough, and you
>constantly insult me.
>4. And yet, you don't object to Arny when he tells obvious lies and
>other snot about me.
>5. whoosh


Yeah.

The trick is not to get trapped in an irrational sequence in which
one's response seems to make sense given the very narrow conext of the
immediate provocation, but which when viewed from the vantage point of
the entire sequence is clearly wacky.

That is, arguing with a madman is a mad thing to do. You get to choose
who you think qualifies as mad.

Scottie's a great example of this. Any one of his remarks may make
sense, even seem the best ethical response untill you view it from a
higher perspective and see the whole sequence. Then it's almost as
wacky as an Arnold string.

Try this on for size: when was the last time you felt you were being
respected as a functioning, intelligent grown-up once you disagreed
with either Arnold or Scott....er.....excuse me....2pid.

Hoobert Heaver

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Dog bites self! (No film.)

> > Witless mocks himself and doesn't have the self-awareness to take credit.
> >
> > > *I really don't care how low [George the Great] and [Prince Shhhh] go to insult me.
> > > They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent persons respect.
> >
> > Sometimes your pithiness is breathtaking, Scooter. Are you even dimly aware
> > of how you eviscerate your own self-righteous crapola through your own
> > words?
>
> Should it matter by whom or how eloquently the truth is told?

Good point. Aren't you sad you don't get credit for revealing the truth?
After all, if you have no idea what you said, you can hardly earn plaudits
for being "honest".

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:38:22 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:


(usual morose garbage snipped)

>I suspect she got to be a lesbian by similar means. :-(

What means would that be?


Hoobert Heaver

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:06:57 -0800 (PST), Boon >
wrote:

>On Feb 3, 2:43?pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:38:22 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> (usual morose garbage snipped)
>>
>> >I suspect she got to be a lesbian by similar means. :-(
>>
>> What means would that be?
>>
>> Hoobert Heaver
>
>I found out about Arny's homophobia some years ago when I used to call
>him "assclown."

I remember that. I specifically remember because I, too, hadn't heard
the term before you used it, but it never occurred to me then (or now)
that it was a gay term

>He used to get really upset over that relatively mild
>term.

Hmmmmm.....I missed that at the time. Since he's always fulminating
about something I never connected it per se to the term.

>
>His recent forays into homophobia are obviously prompted by his
>interactions with George and now Jenn.

Well....Jenn, anyway. George and he have been going at it so long now,
they're dedicating timecapsules to the two of them. It's hard to
imagine after all this time it's George he's reacting to. OTOH, no one
gets under his skin like George does.

<snip>............... There are many reasons to despise
>Arny...his homophobia is Reason #35.

There's a good school project. Anyone up to listing the 100 top
reasons for despising Arnie?



Herbert

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 3, 11:45*am, ScottW > wrote:

> *Go ahead and make jokes at others expense.
> *I'm sure your religious belief will suffer (as if it hasn't already)
> next as you aspire to be accepted.

GOIA has set the bar for religiosity here.

I'm glad to see you give him a pass, 2pid, which of course means that
you agree with him.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
Herbert Hoover > wrote:

> Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?

100. His gracious way when offered the last word.

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 3, 12:34*pm, ScottW > wrote:

> *I really don't care how low the Middiot and Shhtards go to insult me.
> They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent persons respect.

That would indicate that you consider RAO "reality", 2pid.

> But I told you long ago that you infatuation with Arny will lead you
> to emulate Middiot if you're not careful.
> Apparently you're oblivious to what happenned to you.

LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 3, 12:57*pm, ScottW > wrote:

> * Should it matter by whom or how eloquently the truth is told?

Oh. You're a blog. That's different. LoL.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > > Perhaps there were some nuances I missed by scanning it, but your reply
> > > seems in order with what I read.
> >
> > * Who knows what an ADD sufferer really reads?
>
> Is autism different from ADD? LoL.

Your a mean person. Eat **** and die Shhhhhhtard.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 3, 3:38*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > *I really don't care how low the Middiot and Shhtards go
> > to insult me.
> > They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent
> > persons respect.
>
> But they are good friends of Jenn. Theymake her feel like one of the boys..

A lie. I've never met Jenn. We exchanged one email several weeks ago.

I can now see, however, why you can claim to have so many "good
friends" on your "other sires" that you post to. LOL!

> > But I told you long ago that you infatuation with Arny
> > will lead you *to emulate Middiot if you're not careful.
>
> The intresting question is who brought Jenn into RAO.

Who brought you, GOIA?

> > Apparently you're oblivious to what happenned to you.
>
> I suspect she got to be a lesbian by similar means. :-(

Why does the fact that Jenn is a lesbian make you sad, GOIA? I'd say
the only valid reason is that you secretly want her. We all already
knew that.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Herbert Hoover said:

> no one gets under [the Krooborg's] skin like George does.

Disagreed.™ Mistress Jenn has inflicted a considerably more profound
discomfort on Turdborg. Considering that the harshest thing she ever says is
"Shut up, you putz!", can you imagine how devastating Krooger would find it
if Mistress really cut loose on him?


--

Just goes to show how much you know Midduis.
If I were a "sack of ****", how am I able to post to Usenet?
-- A. Krooger, June 1999

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > *Go ahead and make jokes at others expense.
> > *I'm sure your religious belief will suffer (as if it hasn't already)
> > next as you aspire to be accepted.
>
> GOIA has set the bar for religiosity here.
>
> I'm glad to see you give him a pass, 2pid, which of course means that
> you agree with him.

Now that Yapper has declared he "rarely" speaks his true feelings, we have
no idea how religious he really is.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 3, 7:30*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > Go ahead and make jokes at others expense.
> > > I'm sure your religious belief will suffer (as if it hasn't already)
> > > next as you aspire to be accepted.
>
> > GOIA has set the bar for religiosity here.
>
> > I'm glad to see you give him a pass, 2pid, which of course means that
> > you agree with him.
>
> Now that Yapper has declared he "rarely" speaks his true feelings, we have
> no idea how religious he really is.

I still say that 2pid meant he rarely is able to communicate his true
feelings. That's why we end up guessing at his intent so often.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

> > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.

99. His consuming gynephobia.

[Boon]

On Feb 3, 5:41�pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
> 99. His consuming gynephobia.

98. "100's and 1000's."

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

On 3 Feb, 20:24, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 3:38*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > > *I really don't care how low the Middiot and Shhtards go
> > > to insult me.
> > > They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent
> > > persons respect.
>
> > But they are good friends of Jenn. Theymake her feel like one of the boys.
>
> A lie. I've never met Jenn. We exchanged one email several weeks ago.
>
> I can now see, however, why you can claim to have so many "good
> friends" on your "other sires" that you post to. LOL!
>
> > > But I told you long ago that you infatuation with Arny
> > > will lead you *to emulate Middiot if you're not careful.
>
> > The intresting question is who brought Jenn into RAO.
>
> Who brought you, GOIA?
>
> > > Apparently you're oblivious to what happenned to you.
>
> > I suspect she got to be a lesbian by similar means. :-(
>
> Why does the fact that Jenn is a lesbian make you sad, GOIA? I'd say
> the only valid reason is that you secretly want her. We all already
> knew that.

Arny adores mature women like Jenn.
Still, she might be just a little too young for his tastes.

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:18:41 -0600, MiNe 109
> wrote:

>In article >,
> Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>
>> Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
>100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
>Stephen

#76 Creative lexicography. Finding new and imaginative meanings for
the words "lie," "liar" and "lies."

Herbert

[Harry Lavo]

"Boon" > wrote in message
...
On Feb 3, 5:41?pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> MiNe 109 said:
>
> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
> 99. His consuming gynephobia.

98. "100's and 1000's."

*****************
97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and need
we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends everywhere.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On Feb 3, 3:38*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> >
> >
> >
> > > *I really don't care how low the Middiot and Shhtards go
> > > to insult me.
> > > They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent
> > > persons respect.
> >
> > But they are good friends of Jenn. Theymake her feel like one of the boys.
>
> A lie. I've never met Jenn. We exchanged one email several weeks ago.
>
> I can now see, however, why you can claim to have so many "good
> friends" on your "other sires" that you post to. LOL!
>
> > > But I told you long ago that you infatuation with Arny
> > > will lead you *to emulate Middiot if you're not careful.
> >
> > The intresting question is who brought Jenn into RAO.
>
> Who brought you, GOIA?
>
> > > Apparently you're oblivious to what happenned to you.
> >
> > I suspect she got to be a lesbian by similar means. :-(
>
> Why does the fact that Jenn is a lesbian make you sad, GOIA? I'd say
> the only valid reason is that you secretly want her. We all already
> knew that.

It's interesting to see how hard he can troll.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 3 Feb, 20:24, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > wrote:
> > On Feb 3, 3:38*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > "ScottW" > wrote in message
> >
> >
> >
> > > > *I really don't care how low the Middiot and Shhtards go
> > > > to insult me.
> > > > They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent
> > > > persons respect.
> >
> > > But they are good friends of Jenn. Theymake her feel like one of the boys.
> >
> > A lie. I've never met Jenn. We exchanged one email several weeks ago.
> >
> > I can now see, however, why you can claim to have so many "good
> > friends" on your "other sires" that you post to. LOL!
> >
> > > > But I told you long ago that you infatuation with Arny
> > > > will lead you *to emulate Middiot if you're not careful.
> >
> > > The intresting question is who brought Jenn into RAO.
> >
> > Who brought you, GOIA?
> >
> > > > Apparently you're oblivious to what happenned to you.
> >
> > > I suspect she got to be a lesbian by similar means. :-(
> >
> > Why does the fact that Jenn is a lesbian make you sad, GOIA? I'd say
> > the only valid reason is that you secretly want her. We all already
> > knew that.
>
> Arny adores mature women like Jenn.
> Still, she might be just a little too young for his tastes.

I'm exhibiting tremendous restraint right now...

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:29:26 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>Herbert Hoover said:
>
>> no one gets under [the Krooborg's] skin like George does.
>
>Disagreed.™ Mistress Jenn has inflicted a considerably more profound
>discomfort on Turdborg. Considering that the harshest thing she ever says is
>"Shut up, you putz!", can you imagine how devastating Krooger would find it
>if Mistress really cut loose on him?


Several things: I think you're right that Jenn has knockout potential
for all sorts of reasons, sexual humiliation being a prime
consideration, especially since she wouldn't be intending it, but
Arnie would perceive it anyway.

However, "world class" rating, and certainly the #1 ranking requires
more than just potential, and more than just the current season.
Anyone can be a Flash In The Krueger, after all (no disrespect here,
Jenn. We all have high hopes for you).

You've been at a high level for years, as have a couple others. We're
at the point now where Arnie breaks out in hives just seeing your name
on the monitor.

Of course, it's also true that the very thought of JA shrivels the
Krueger jewels, so maybe I should give this more thought.......
>
>
>--
>
>Just goes to show how much you know Midduis.
>If I were a "sack of ****", how am I able to post to Usenet?
> -- A. Krooger, June 1999


Your sign off line above just proves my point.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > Arny adores mature women like Jenn.
> > Still, she might be just a little too young for his tastes.
>
> I'm exhibiting tremendous restraint right now...

I doubt that. You're probably beating a Scottie effigy with your big, scary
whip.

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:19:47 -0500, "Harry Lavo" >
wrote:

>
>"Boon" > wrote in message
...
>On Feb 3, 5:41?pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
>> MiNe 109 said:
>>
>> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>>
>> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>>
>> 99. His consuming gynephobia.
>
>98. "100's and 1000's."
>
>*****************
>97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and need
>we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends everywhere.
>
#96 His sweet way with argument

Herbert

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 3, 9:06*pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:19:47 -0500, "Harry Lavo" >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"Boon" > wrote in message
> ....
> >On Feb 3, 5:41?pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
> >> MiNe 109 said:
>
> >> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> >> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
> >> 99. His consuming gynephobia.
>
> >98. *"100's and 1000's."
>
> >*****************
> >97. *The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and need
> >we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends everywhere..
>
> #96 His sweet way with argument

#95. His overwhelming self-awareness.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > >> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
> >
> > >> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
> >
> > >> 99. His consuming gynephobia.
> >
> > >98. *"100's and 1000's."
> >
> > >*****************
> > >97. *The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and need
> > >we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends everywhere.
> >
> > #96 His sweet way with argument
>
> #95. His overwhelming self-awareness.

94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.




--

Words don't have just one meaning.
Combinations of words don't have just one meaning.
A. Krooger, 9 December 2008

Since everything I write defines what Krooglish is, there are no first tries.
A. Krooger, 22 July 2003

[Iain Churches[_2_]]

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
>
>> I really don't care how low the Middiot and Shhtards go
>> to insult me.
>> They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent
>> persons respect.
>
> But they are good friends of Jenn. Theymake her feel like one of the boys.


Your appraisal of the situation is (surprise, surprise)
totally incorrect. Jenn. like most of the others, brings
to this group her own opinions and expertise.
The guitar discussion is an excellent example, of
well-informed views, based on experience and
careful observation. Your absence from this discussion
is noticed and greatly appreciated.
>

Iain

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 2, 9:08*pm, ScottW > wrote:
> On Feb 2, 7:02*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > wrote:
> > On Feb 2, 7:13*pm, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > Shhhh! said:
>
> > > > > > I fear I may forget your fear of my fear of her fear.
>
> > > > > Stop picking on Scottie. That's my job.
>
> > > > Is this our first fight? LOL!
>
> > > I've deputized you to demean and upbraid Witless, but not so for Stephen.
> > > His "posse" dues are unpaid, so he gets no perks.
>
> > Thank you. I'm awaiting further Posse instructions.
>
> *LoL.

Quit lying. You're not smart enough to get the joke.

>*I always knew indedendent thinking was not your
> strong suit. *Poor sshhhh, a borg awaiting orders from the hive.

Poor 2pid, all alone in the cold...again.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > >> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
> > >
> > > >> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
> > >
> > > >> 99. His consuming gynephobia.
> > >
> > > >98. *"100's and 1000's."
> > >
> > > >*****************
> > > >97. *The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> > > >need
> > > >we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> > > >everywhere.
> > >
> > > #96 His sweet way with argument
> >
> > #95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
>
> 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.

93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.

Stephen

[Arny Krueger]

"ScottW" > wrote in message

> On Feb 3, 1:38 pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "ScottW" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> I really don't care how low the Middiot and Shhtards go
>>> to insult me.
>>> They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent
>>> persons respect.
>>
>> But they are good friends of Jenn. Theymake her feel
>> like one of the boys.
>>
>>> But I told you long ago that you infatuation with Arny
>>> will lead you to emulate Middiot if you're not careful.
>>
>> The intresting question is who brought Jenn into RAO.
>>
>>> Apparently you're oblivious to what happenned to you.
>>
>> I suspect she got to be a lesbian by similar means. :-(
>
> One date with you would suffice.

Yup Scotty, that will keep you in good graces with the Middiot.

[Clyde Slick]

On 3 Feb, 21:34, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 3 Feb, 20:24, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > > wrote:
> > > On Feb 3, 3:38*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > "ScottW" > wrote in message
>
> > >
>
> > > > > *I really don't care how low the Middiot and Shhtards go
> > > > > to insult me.
> > > > > They are intolerant scum undeserving of any decent
> > > > > persons respect.
>
> > > > But they are good friends of Jenn. Theymake her feel like one of the boys.
>
> > > A lie. I've never met Jenn. We exchanged one email several weeks ago.
>
> > > I can now see, however, why you can claim to have so many "good
> > > friends" on your "other sires" that you post to. LOL!
>
> > > > > But I told you long ago that you infatuation with Arny
> > > > > will lead you *to emulate Middiot if you're not careful.
>
> > > > The intresting question is who brought Jenn into RAO.
>
> > > Who brought you, GOIA?
>
> > > > > Apparently you're oblivious to what happenned to you.
>
> > > > I suspect she got to be a lesbian by similar means. :-(
>
> > > Why does the fact that Jenn is a lesbian make you sad, GOIA? I'd say
> > > the only valid reason is that you secretly want her. We all already
> > > knew that.
>
> > Arny adores mature women like Jenn.
> > Still, she might be just a little too young for his tastes.
>
> I'm exhibiting tremendous restraint right now...-


Arny has stated his preference is for age 60+ women

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message


>> Arny adores mature women like Jenn.

I seriously doubt she is much more than a child in my view. She certainly
acts like one.

>> Still, she might be just a little too young for his tastes.

Not to mention her preferences at this time which are pretty clear.

> I'm exhibiting tremendous restraint right now...

No.

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:10:37 -0600, MiNe 109
> wrote:

>In article >,
> George M. Middius > wrote:
>
>> Shhhh! said:
>>
>> > > >> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>> > >
>> > > >> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>> > >
>> > > >> 99. His consuming gynephobia.
>> > >
>> > > >98. *"100's and 1000's."
>> > >
>> > > >*****************
>> > > >97. *The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
>> > > >need
>> > > >we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
>> > > >everywhere.
>> > >
>> > > #96 His sweet way with argument
>> >
>> > #95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
>>
>> 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
>
>93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
>
>Stephen
#92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Herbert Hoover said:

> >> > > >> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
> >> > >
> >> > > >> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
> >> > >
> >> > > >> 99. His consuming gynephobia.
> >> > >
> >> > > >98. *"100's and 1000's."
> >> > >
> >> > > >97. *The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> >> > > >need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> >> > > >everywhere.
> >> > >
> >> > > #96 His sweet way with argument
> >> >
> >> > #95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
> >>
> >> 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
> >
> >93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
> >
> #92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance

91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.

[Bill[_16_]]

In article >, HHoover1928
@gmail.com says...

> #92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
>

#91: His wonderful sense of humor

--
Bill

[Bill[_16_]]

In article >,
says...
> In article >, HHoover1928
> @gmail.com says...
>
> > #92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
> >
>
> #91: His wonderful sense of humor

Oops- I see George grabbed #91. Let's call this #90.

--
Bill

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:27:17 -0800, Bill > wrote:

>In article >, HHoover1928
says...
>
>> #92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
>>
>
>#91: His wonderful sense of humor
Agreed, Bill, but George beat you to #91. so....

#90 His wonderful sense of humor


Herbert

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:27:17 -0800, Bill > wrote:

>In article >, HHoover1928
says...
>
>> #92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
>>
>
>#91: His wonderful sense of humor
>
#89 His superior musicality

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

The list must go on in its entirety.

> Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?

100. His gracious way when offered the last word.

99. His consuming gynephobia.

98. "100's and 1000's."

97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
everywhere.

96 His sweet way with argument

95. His overwhelming self-awareness.

94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.

93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.

92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance

91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.

90: His wonderful sense of humor

89 His superior musicality

[Boon]

On Feb 4, 9:45�am, George M. Middius > wrote:
> The list must go on in its entirety.
>
> > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
> 99. His consuming gynephobia.
>
> 98. �"100's and 1000's."
>
> 97. �The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> everywhere.
>
> 96 His sweet way with argument
>
> 95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
>
> 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
>
> 93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
>
> 92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
>
> 91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.
>
> 90: His wonderful sense of humor
>
> 89 His superior musicality

88. His preoccupation with his schoolmates' "firehoses."

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> 88. His preoccupation with his schoolmates' "firehoses."

LOL! Nice blast from the past.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > The list must go on in its entirety.
> >
> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
> >
> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
> >
> > 99. His consuming gynephobia.
> >
> > 98. ?"100's and 1000's."
> >
> > 97. ?The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> > need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> > everywhere.
> >
> > 96 His sweet way with argument
> >
> > 95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
> >
> > 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
> >
> > 93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
> >
> > 92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
> >
> > 91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.
> >
> > 90: His wonderful sense of humor
> >
> > 89 His superior musicality
>
> 88. His preoccupation with his schoolmates' "firehoses."

87. Krooger's vaunted ability to "fix radar's in the snow".

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:45:28 -0500, George M. Middius
> wrote:

>
>
>The list must go on in its entirety.
>
>> Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
>100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
>99. His consuming gynephobia.
>
>98. "100's and 1000's."
>
>97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
>need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
>everywhere.
>
>96 His sweet way with argument
>
>95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
>
>94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
>
>93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
>
>92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
>
>91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.
>
>90: His wonderful sense of humor
>
>89 His superior musicality
>
>
#88 His warmth and concern for others' families

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> The list must go on in its entirety.
>
> > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
> 99. His consuming gynephobia.
>
> 98. "100's and 1000's."
>
> 97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> everywhere.
>
> 96 His sweet way with argument
>
> 95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
>
> 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
>
> 93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
>
> 92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
>
> 91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.
>
> 90: His wonderful sense of humor
>
> 89 His superior musicality

88. His patient pedantry.

[MiNe 109]

In article >,
Herbert Hoover > wrote:

> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:45:28 -0500, George M. Middius
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >The list must go on in its entirety.
> >
> >> Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
> >
> >100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
> >
> >99. His consuming gynephobia.
> >
> >98. "100's and 1000's."
> >
> >97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> >need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> >everywhere.
> >
> >96 His sweet way with argument
> >
> >95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
> >
> >94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
> >
> >93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
> >
> >92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
> >
> >91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.
> >
> >90: His wonderful sense of humor
> >
> >89 His superior musicality
> >
> >
> #88 His warmth and concern for others' families

87. His patient pedantry.

(Ignore previous numbering, sorta like Schubert or Dvorak symphonies.)

[Clyde Slick]

On 4 Feb, 12:53, Boon > wrote:
> On Feb 4, 9:45 am, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > The list must go on in its entirety.
>
> > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
> > 99. His consuming gynephobia.
>
> > 98. "100's and 1000's."
>
> > 97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> > need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> > everywhere.
>
> > 96 His sweet way with argument
>
> > 95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
>
> > 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.

[Clyde Slick]

On 4 Feb, 16:38, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 4 Feb, 12:53, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 9:45 am, George M. Middius > wrote:
>
> > > The list must go on in its entirety.
>
> > > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> > > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
> > > 99. His consuming gynephobia.
>
> > > 98. "100's and 1000's."
>
> > > 97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> > > need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> > > everywhere.
>
> > > 96 His sweet way with argument
>
> > > 95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
>
> > > 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
>
> > > 93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
>
> > > 92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
>
> > > 91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.
>
> > > 90: His wonderful sense of humor
>
> > > 89 His superior musicality
>
> > 88. Â*His preoccupation with his schoolmates' "firehoses."
>
> > Boon- Ascunde citatul -
>
> > - Afişare text în citat -
>
> 87 Â*Giving bank tellers 'dirty' checks to cash- Ascunde citatul -
>
> - Afişare text în citat -

make that 86

85 cornering the local supplies of toilet paper

and let's cut right to number 1, the whole pcabx thing.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article >,
MiNe 109 > wrote:


> (Ignore previous numbering, sorta like Schubert or Dvorak symphonies.)

LOL Or Koechel numbers.

[Harry Lavo]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> The list must go on in its entirety.
>
>> Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
> 99. His consuming gynephobia.
>
> 98. "100's and 1000's."
>
> 97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> everywhere.
>
> 96 His sweet way with argument
>
> 95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
>
> 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
>
> 93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
>
> 92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
>
> 91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.
>
> 90: His wonderful sense of humor
>
> 89 His superior musicality
>
90 His fit, bronzed appearance
>
>

[Herbert Hoover[_3_]]

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:41:25 -0800 (PST), Clyde Slick
> wrote:

>On 4 Feb, 16:38, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>> On 4 Feb, 12:53, Boon > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 4, 9:45 am, George M. Middius > wrote:
>>
>> > > The list must go on in its entirety.
>>
>> > > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>>
>> > > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>>
>> > > 99. His consuming gynephobia.
>>
>> > > 98. "100's and 1000's."
>>
>> > > 97. The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
>> > > need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
>> > > everywhere.
>>
>> > > 96 His sweet way with argument
>>
>> > > 95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
>>
>> > > 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
>>
>> > > 93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
>>
>> > > 92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
>>
>> > > 91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.
>>
>> > > 90: His wonderful sense of humor
>>
>> > > 89 His superior musicality
>>
>> > 88. *His preoccupation with his schoolmates' "firehoses."
>>
>> > Boon- Ascunde citatul -
>>
>> > - Afi?are text în citat -
>>
>> 87 *Giving bank tellers 'dirty' checks to cash- Ascunde citatul -
>>
>> - Afi?are text în citat -
>
>make that 86
>
>85 cornering the local supplies of toilet paper
>
>and let's cut right to number 1, the whole pcabx thing.

I had forgotten that! Good one, Clyde!


Herbert

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Feb 3, 8:18*pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:18:41 -0600, MiNe 109
>
> > wrote:
> >In article >,
> > Herbert Hoover > wrote:
>
> >> Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
>
> >100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
>
> >Stephen
>
> #76 Creative lexicography. Finding new and imaginative meanings for
> the words "lie," "liar" and "lies."

75: His complete winningness to accept responsibility for his actions:
"The turd stops here."

[MiNe 109]

In article
>,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" > wrote:

> On Feb 3, 8:18*pm, Herbert Hoover > wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:18:41 -0600, MiNe 109
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >In article >,
> > > Herbert Hoover > wrote:
> >
> > >> Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
> >
> > >100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
> >
> > >Stephen
> >
> > #76 Creative lexicography. Finding new and imaginative meanings for
> > the words "lie," "liar" and "lies."
>
> 75: His complete winningness to accept responsibility for his actions:
> "The turd stops here."

74. His imitable phone etiquette.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Somebody started a splinter thread so the numbering is off.

> > > > Anyone up to listing the 100 top reasons for despising Arnie?
> > >
> > > 100. His gracious way when offered the last word.
> > >
> > > 99. His consuming gynephobia.
> > >
> > > 98. ?"100's and 1000's."
> > >
> > > 97. ?The way he outshines us all, traveling to LoTs' of newsgroups (and
> > > need we be reminded, HTML groups) and making LoTs' of good friends
> > > everywhere.
> > >
> > > 96 His sweet way with argument
> > >
> > > 95. His overwhelming self-awareness.
> > >
> > > 94. His startling admission that he actually does have a turd collection.
> > >
> > > 93. The unmatched breadth and depth of his knowledge.
> > >
> > > 92 The graceful bent of his sexual tolerance
> > >
> > > 91. Arnii's no-compromises dedication to truthfulness.
> > >
> > > 90: His wonderful sense of humor
> > >
> > > 89 His superior musicality
> >
> > 88. His preoccupation with his schoolmates' "firehoses."
>
> 87. Krooger's vaunted ability to "fix radar's in the snow".

86. Krooger's ability to spot "liars" and their "lies" that are completely
imperceptible to Normals.

[Bill[_16_]]

In article >,
says...

> 74. His imitable phone etiquette.


LOL!! Very good.

--
Bill