Krooger still lost in the darkness

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Since RAO went to the 'borgs, at least 20 Normals have realized that Arnii
Krooger isn't right in the head. Half of them have said so in their posts.
The others have said the same thing in "private posts". (That's the
Krooborg's bizarre term for email.) There are probably more Normals who
share the opinion that Krooger is whacked. Probably a lot more. Mr. ****
invariably interprets an assertion that he is mentally ill as an "attack".
Sometimes it is an attack, and other times it's not.

It's not crazy per se to believe in christian dogma. Those beliefs are held
by a great many individuals who are quite sane. Same goes for those who
adhere to other religions' dogma. The believers aren't necessarily insane.
They may behave irrationally or self-destructively, but if they can explain
why they're blowing up school buses or fondling strings of beads, they're
probably not insane.

Nor is class envy necessarily a marker for insanity. Small-minded
individuals harbor all sorts of foolish, self-defeating prejudices. If you
press one of them and eventually he admits that his acrimony is driven by
the unfairness of it all, you realize he's sane. Maybe not somebody you'd
find interesting, what with the consuming pettiness etc.

Arnii Krooger stands alone on RAO. He's not the only one of our playmates
who is consumed with irrational, self-abnegating emotions, and he's not the
only one who believes in "god" or similar fairy tales. But he is the only
one who nearly everyone says is insane. Sadly, the nature of the Beast's
mental illness impels him to say that we're all his "enemies", and that we
tell him to get professional treatment because we want to "humiliate" him.
What Krazy Krooger is unable to perceive is that even though we all have
terrible opinions of him, that doesn't mean every single thing we say to
him is intended to bring about the dread humiliation. Sometimes we tell him
things because we believe they're true and because we really do want him to
take heed and address his problems.

Is there a vast conspiracy against the Krooborg that's been underway for
more than 10 years and involved dozens or hundreds of disparate posters? Or
is it possible that Arnii is unable to perceive the world as it really is?

[[email protected]]

> Arnii Krooger stands alone on RAO. He's not the only one of our playmates
> who is consumed with irrational, self-abnegating emotions, and he's not the
> only one who believes in "god" or similar fairy tales. But he is the only
> one who nearly everyone says is insane. Sadly, the nature of the Beast's
> mental illness impels him to say that we're all his "enemies", and that we
> tell him to get professional treatment because we want to "humiliate" him.
> What Krazy Krooger is unable to perceive is that even though we all have
> terrible opinions of him, that doesn't mean every single thing we say to
> him is intended to bring about the dread humiliation. Sometimes we tell him
> things because we believe they're true and because we really do want him to
> take heed and address his problems.
>
> Is there a vast conspiracy against the Krooborg that's been underway for
> more than 10 years and involved dozens or hundreds of disparate posters? Or
> is it possible that Arnii is unable to perceive the world as it really is?

Krueger is depressingly normal. You are ****ed up, but not in any
particularly interesting way.

[Clyde Slick]

On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:

>
> *Krueger is depressingly normal.

You must be getting "at least" a couple of
false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.

[Arny Krueger]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:

>> Krueger is depressingly normal.

What's to be depressed about?

> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.

The false KP accusations are generally like this one, coming from some
demented member of the Middiot Posse, often Art himself. As obsessed as Art
is with them, we have a suggestion that he was the originator of the tragic
email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10 years later, for grins and
giggles.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 29, 6:57*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> The false KP accusations are generally like this one, coming from some
> demented member of the Middiot Posse, often Art himself. As obsessed as Art
> is with them, *we have a suggestion that he was the originator of the tragic
> email.

Too late, GOIA. You've already admitted the whole thing was a
falsehood.

[Clyde Slick]

On 29 Dec, 07:57, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> >> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> What's to be depressed about?
>
> > You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> The false KP accusations are generally like this one, coming from some
> demented member of the Middiot Posse, often Art himself. As obsessed as Art
> is with them, *we have a suggestion that he was the originator of the tragic
> email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10 years later, for grins and
> giggles.

it was your "suggestion"
My" suggestion" is that you fondle the bodies of dead children

[Arny Krueger]

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> On 29 Dec, 07:57, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>>
>> What's to be depressed about?

>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.

>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, we
>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
>> years later, for grins and giggles.

> it was your "suggestion"

I'm really impressed with my ability to make one suggestion 10 years ago,
and program somone who claims to be an adult in such a way that they have
acted in public like an idiot ever since.

> My" suggestion" is that you fondle the bodies of dead children

Proof of my claim - by asking one question 10 years ago, I programmed Art to
behave like an idiot in public. It must really suck being him.

[Boon]

On Dec 29, 6:22�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 29 Dec, 07:57, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> >>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> >> What's to be depressed about?
> >>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
> >> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> >> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, we
> >> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> >> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> >> years later, for grins and giggles.
> > it was your "suggestion"
>
> I'm really impressed with my ability to make one suggestion 10 years ago,
> and program somone who claims to be an adult in such a way that they have
> acted in public like an idiot ever since.
>
> > My" suggestion" is that you fondle the bodies of dead children
>
> Proof of my claim - by asking one question 10 years ago, I programmed Art to
> behave like an idiot in public. It must really suck being him.

You programmed Art to bring up pornographic emails concerning the
death of your son? You're sick. Please leave the group.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

On 29 Dec, 11:37, Boon > wrote:
> On Dec 29, 6:22 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > > On 29 Dec, 07:57, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> > >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
> >
>
> > >>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> > >>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> > >> What's to be depressed about?
> > >>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > >>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
> > >> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> > >> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> > >> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, we
> > >> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> > >> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> > >> years later, for grins and giggles.
> > > it was your "suggestion"
>
> > I'm really impressed with my ability to make one suggestion 10 years ago,
> > and program somone who claims to be an adult in such a way that they have
> > acted in public like an idiot ever since.
>
> > > My" suggestion" is that you fondle the bodies of dead children
>
> > Proof of my claim - by asking one question 10 years ago, I programmed Art to
> > behave like an idiot in public. It must really suck being him.
>
> You programmed Art to bring up pornographic emails concerning the
> death of your son? *You're sick. *Please leave the group.
>
> Boon-


BTW
Sorry I am late with this response. I was programmed
to post it 10 minutes ago. My apologies to Arny, my master programmer.

[Clyde Slick]

On 29 Dec, 09:22, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 29 Dec, 07:57, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> >>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> >> What's to be depressed about?
> >>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
> >> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> >> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, we
> >> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> >> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> >> years later, for grins and giggles.
> > it was your "suggestion"
>
> I'm really impressed with my ability to make one suggestion 10 years ago,
> and program somone who claims to be an adult in such a way that they have
> acted in public like an idiot ever since.
>
> > My" suggestion" is that you fondle the bodies of dead children
>
> Proof of my claim - by asking one question 10 years ago, I programmed Art to
> behave like an idiot in public. It must really suck being him.-

You repeated it many times, and much more recently.
But you did that on your own,
I didn't program you.

BTW, how much money did you
earn last night pimping off your wife in the back alley?
Hey, don't blame me for asking, you
programmed me to ask you that question.

[Arny Krueger]

"Boon" > wrote in message


> You programmed Art to bring up pornographic emails
> concerning the death of your son?

You seem to be as badly informed as ever, Marc. Art is making himself look
stupid over just one email, not emails (plural). And, that email while
totally tasteless and childish, was not legally pornographic. I'm sorry that
I did not program you with subroutines to help maintain correct information,
in the light of your well-known propensity to make stupid, gross errors.

[Boon]

On Dec 29, 10:33�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > You programmed Art to bring up pornographic emails
> > concerning the death of your son?
>
> You seem to be as badly informed as ever, Marc. Art is making himself look
> stupid over just one email, not emails (plural). And, that email while
> totally tasteless and childish, was not legally pornographic. I'm sorry that
> I did not program you with subroutines to help maintain correct information,
> in the light of your well-known propensity to make stupid, gross errors.

Blah blah blah, crazy man. As usual, you're missing the point. It's
the WAY you worded everything that matters, not your intent. I was
making fun of the WAY you mangled that post. In other words, it's
business as usual in the Kroo-Dungeon.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

On 29 Dec, 13:33, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > You programmed Art to bring up pornographic emails
> > concerning the death of your son?
>
> You seem to be as badly informed as ever, Marc. Art is making himself look
> stupid over just one email, not emails (plural). And, that email while
> totally tasteless and childish, was not legally pornographic. I'm sorry that
> I did not program you with subroutines to help maintain correct information,
> in the light of your well-known propensity to make stupid, gross errors.

Arny's story
story 1 - he received KP email including at least one photo of an
infant
story 2- a cop looked at it three years later (Arny stored what he
thought was KP
on his hard drive for three years) and told Arny the pictures were of
adults
story 3 - the photos in question were not prornographic

Gee, this is what they must have looked like:

In Arny's Baptist infused mind, this is his idea of KP:

http://i.pbase.com/g5/23/504423/2/68497097.5843A1dM.jpg

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
> > On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> >> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> What's to be depressed about?
>
> > You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> The false KP accusations are generally like this one, coming from some
> demented member of the Middiot Posse, often Art himself. As obsessed as Art
> is with them, we have a suggestion that he was the originator of the tragic
> email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10 years later, for grins and
> giggles.

Why don't you take the high road on this Arny? I think that it would
flatter you to do so.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>
>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>>
>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>>
>> What's to be depressed about?
>>
>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>>
>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, we
>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
>> years later, for grins and giggles.
>
> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?

Define high road.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > The false[sic] KP accusations ... for grins and giggles.

> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny? I think that it would
> flatter you to do so.

If you're suggesting Arnii should stop rehashing his son's funeral, forget
about it. That would interfere with Turdy's Prime Directive. Also with the
secondary, tertiary, and quaternary objectives. And all the other ones too.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
> >>
> >> What's to be depressed about?
> >>
> >>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
> >>
> >> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> >> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, we
> >> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> >> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> >> years later, for grins and giggles.
> >
> > Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> Define high road.

The road that the whole KP thing is not on.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Looks like the Krooborg has already gone through all his winnings from his
million-IKYABWAI jackpot.

> > Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?

> Define high road.

Human beings know what that means, Your Turdship. However, your mental
illness might interfere with your ability to process the phrase, just as it
has interfered with many similar language tasks in the past. To help you
get caught up, here are some illustrative examples.

Figure 1. This picture shows the Kroo-road after your kith and kin finished
their picnic. Note the absence of usable turds.
http://www.geocities.com/glanbrok/RAO_Toons/Krooger/Kroo_road_1.jpg

Figure 2. Here is a view of the delivery entrance on the Kroo-road.
http://www.geocities.com/glanbrok/RAO_Toons/Krooger/Kroo_road_1.jpg

Figure 3. This is a typical sight on the Kroo-road.
http://www.woostercollective.com/turd.jpg

[Clyde Slick]

On 29 Dec, 22:01, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
> >>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> >>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> >> What's to be depressed about?
>
> >>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> >> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> >> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, *we
> >> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> >> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> >> years later, for grins and giggles.
>
> > Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> Define high road.- Ascunde citatul -
>
> - Afiºare text în citat -

Here is a recording made in Detroit.
Must be your work

http://mixtapedetroit.com/images/dj%20butter%20****svillecover.jpg

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
>>>> message
>>>>
>>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>>>>
>>>> What's to be depressed about?
>>>>
>>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
>>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>>>>
>>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
>>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
>>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, we
>>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
>>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
>>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
>>>
>>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>>
>> Define high road.

> The road that the whole KP thing is not on.

As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.

As fascincated as they are with KP, I'd hate to see the likes of Art, Marc,
George, or ****R hanging out with my grandchildren or anybody else's kids.
I wonder if Marc's wife knows about his fascination with KP?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 29, 12:33*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > You programmed Art to bring up pornographic emails
> > concerning the death of your son?
>
> And, that email while totally tasteless and childish, was not legally pornographic.

I thought all the MSP told you was that it wasn't a child.

Now it appears the MSP rendered a legal opinion. I'd like to see this
alleged officer's license to practice law.

Or are we lying again, GOIA?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 30, 6:04*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>> message
>
> >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> >>>> What's to be depressed about?
>
> >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, *we
> >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
>
> >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> >> Define high road.
> > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
>
> As fascincated as they are with KP, I'd hate to see the likes of Art, Marc,
> George, or ****R hanging out with my grandchildren or anybody else's kids..

I know, GOIA. They might say something that could be used against you
in a court of law.

[Boon]

On Dec 30, 6:42�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 6:04�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > > In article
> > > >, "Arny
> > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > >>> In article
> > >>> >, "Arny
> > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> > >>>> message
> >
> > >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> > >>>> What's to be depressed about?
>
> > >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> > >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> > >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> > >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, �we
> > >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> > >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> > >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
>
> > >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> > >> Define high road.
> > > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> > As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> > among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
>
> > As fascincated as they are with KP, I'd hate to see the likes of Art, Marc,
> > George, or ****R hanging out with my grandchildren or anybody else's kids.
>
> I know, GOIA. They might say something that could be used against you
> in a court of law.-

Even if the photographs weren't pornographic, Arny's descriptions of
them were.

Boon

[Boon]

On Dec 30, 4:04�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>> message
>
> >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> >>>> What's to be depressed about?
>
> >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, �we
> >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
>
> >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> >> Define high road.
> > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
>
> As fascincated as they are with KP, I'd hate to see the likes of Art, Marc,
> George, or ****R hanging out with my grandchildren or anybody else's kids..
> I wonder if Marc's wife knows about his fascination with KP?

Bearing false witness against thy neighbor again? Tsk tsk, sinner.

Boon

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 30, 10:00*am, Boon > wrote:
> On Dec 30, 6:42 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > On Dec 30, 6:04 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> > > As fascincated as they are with KP, I'd hate to see the likes of Art, Marc,
> > > George, or ****R hanging out with my grandchildren or anybody else's kids.
>
> > I know, GOIA. They might say something that could be used against you
> > in a court of law.
>
> Even if the photographs weren't pornographic, Arny's descriptions of
> them were.

There were no photographs. GOIA made the whole thing up.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>> message
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
> >>>>
> >>>> What's to be depressed about?
> >>>>
> >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
> >>>>
> >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, we
> >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
> >>>
> >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
> >>
> >> Define high road.
>
> > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.

I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they know that. So
why not take the high road?

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
ScottW > wrote:

> On Dec 30, 8:54*am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > > > In article
> > > > >, "Arny
> > > > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > >
> > > >>> In article
> > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> > > >>>> message
> > >
> > > >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> >
> > > >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
> >
> > > >>>> What's to be depressed about?
> >
> > > >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > > >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
> >
> > > >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> > > >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> > > >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, *we
> > > >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> > > >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> > > >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
> >
> > > >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
> >
> > > >> Define high road.
> >
> > > > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
> >
> > > As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> > > among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
> >
> > I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they know that. *So
> > why not take the high road?
>
> Arny would miss you too much.
>
> ScottW

Oh wow! Nice one!

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
>>>>>> message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's to be depressed about?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
>>>>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
>>>>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot
>>>>>> Posse, often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with
>>>>>> them, we have a suggestion that he was the
>>>>>> originator of the tragic email. He's just trying to
>>>>>> retread it almost 10 years later, for grins and
>>>>>> giggles.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>>>>
>>>> Define high road.
>>
>>> The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>>
>> As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is
>> a favorite topic among your good buddies in the Middiot
>> Posse.
>
> I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they
> know that. So why not take the high road?

Still waiting for that statement about what the high road is.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>>>> message
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What's to be depressed about?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>>>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >>>>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot
> >>>>>> Posse, often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with
> >>>>>> them, we have a suggestion that he was the
> >>>>>> originator of the tragic email. He's just trying to
> >>>>>> retread it almost 10 years later, for grins and
> >>>>>> giggles.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
> >>>>
> >>>> Define high road.
> >>
> >>> The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
> >>
> >> As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is
> >> a favorite topic among your good buddies in the Middiot
> >> Posse.
> >
> > I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they
> > know that. So why not take the high road?
>
> Still waiting for that statement about what the high road is.

Look 4 paragraphs up.

[Boon]

On Dec 30, 8:24�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 10:00�am, Boon > wrote:
>
> > On Dec 30, 6:42 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > > On Dec 30, 6:04 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> > > > As fascincated as they are with KP, I'd hate to see the likes of Art, Marc,
> > > > George, or ****R hanging out with my grandchildren or anybody else's kids.
>
> > > I know, GOIA. They might say something that could be used against you
> > > in a court of law.
>
> > Even if the photographs weren't pornographic, Arny's descriptions of
> > them were.
>
> There were no photographs. GOIA made the whole thing up.

I know, but could a case by made for the descriptions? After all, I
found them very disturbing and upsetting since they contained graphic
details of deviant sexual practices. There's a legal basis for this.
It doesn't even matter if the pics were real or not.

Boon

[Boon]

On Dec 30, 10:44�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>>>> message
>
> >>>>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> >>>>>> What's to be depressed about?
>
> >>>>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>>>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> >>>>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >>>>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot
> >>>>>> Posse, often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with
> >>>>>> them, �we have a suggestion that he was the
> >>>>>> originator of the tragic email. He's just trying to
> >>>>>> retread it almost 10 years later, for grins and
> >>>>>> giggles.
>
> >>>>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> >>>> Define high road.
>
> >>> The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> >> As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is
> >> a favorite topic among your good buddies in the Middiot
> >> Posse.
>
> > I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they
> > know that. �So why not take the high road?
>
> Still waiting for some guidance on how to lead an ethical, productive life.

That's a pity.

Boon

[Boon]

On Dec 30, 8:54�am, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
> �"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > > In article
> > > >, "Arny
> > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > >>> In article
> > >>> >, "Arny
> > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> > >>>> message
> >
> > >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> > >>>> What's to be depressed about?
>
> > >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> > >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> > >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> > >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, �we
> > >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> > >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> > >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
>
> > >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> > >> Define high road.
>
> > > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> > As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> > among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
>
> I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they know that. �So
> why not take the high road?

The high road involves NOT bringing it up in the first place.
Personally, I never bring it up, I only react because it sickens me.
My animosity towards Arny started with the original email. As a
father, it upset me to learn that someone sent Arny this material.
When I found out that Arny falsified headers and made the whole
incident up, all bets were off. If this was never brought up again,
I'd be happy. I've said so many times in the past. But it does get
brought up over and over, and when you go through the archives, you'll
find that Arny is behind it a majority of the time. Once it is brought
up, Arny has to engage in the debating trade and argue point by point,
extending the subject indefinitely.

Of course this could all be alleviated if Arny would just leave the
group. I think everyone's point is that we don't want to share
cyberspace with someone like him.

Boon

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Dec 30, 8:54?am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > ?"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > > > In article
> > > > >, "Arny
> > > > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > >
> > > >>> In article
> > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> > > >>>> message
> > >
> > > >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> >
> > > >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
> >
> > > >>>> What's to be depressed about?
> >
> > > >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > > >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
> >
> > > >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> > > >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> > > >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, ?we
> > > >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> > > >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> > > >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
> >
> > > >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
> >
> > > >> Define high road.
> >
> > > > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
> >
> > > As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> > > among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
> >
> > I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they know that. ?So
> > why not take the high road?
>
> The high road involves NOT bringing it up in the first place.
> Personally, I never bring it up, I only react because it sickens me.
> My animosity towards Arny started with the original email. As a
> father, it upset me to learn that someone sent Arny this material.
> When I found out that Arny falsified headers and made the whole
> incident up, all bets were off. If this was never brought up again,
> I'd be happy. I've said so many times in the past. But it does get
> brought up over and over, and when you go through the archives, you'll
> find that Arny is behind it a majority of the time. Once it is brought
> up, Arny has to engage in the debating trade and argue point by point,
> extending the subject indefinitely.
>
> Of course this could all be alleviated if Arny would just leave the
> group. I think everyone's point is that we don't want to share
> cyberspace with someone like him.
>
> Boon

Do you happen to have a link to the very beginning of the whole KP thing?

[Boon]

On Dec 30, 11:29�am, Jenn > wrote:
> In article
> >,
>
>
>
>
>
> �Boon > wrote:
> > On Dec 30, 8:54?am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > In article >,
> > > ?"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > >
> > > > > In article
> > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > >>> In article
> > > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> > > > >>>> message
> > > >
> > > > >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> > > > >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> > > > >>>> What's to be depressed about?
>
> > > > >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > > > >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> > > > >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> > > > >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> > > > >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, ?we
> > > > >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> > > > >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> > > > >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
>
> > > > >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> > > > >> Define high road.
>
> > > > > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> > > > As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> > > > among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
>
> > > I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they know that. ?So
> > > why not take the high road?
>
> > The high road involves NOT bringing it up in the first place.
> > Personally, I never bring it up, I only react because it sickens me.
> > My animosity towards Arny started with the original email. �As a
> > father, it upset me to learn that someone sent Arny this material.
> > When I found out that Arny falsified headers and made the whole
> > incident up, all bets were off. �If this was never brought up again,
> > I'd be happy. �I've said so many times in the past. �But it does get
> > brought up over and over, and when you go through the archives, you'll
> > find that Arny is behind it a majority of the time. Once it is brought
> > up, Arny has to engage in the debating trade and argue point by point,
> > extending the subject indefinitely.
>
> > Of course this could all be alleviated if Arny would just leave the
> > group. I think everyone's point is that we don't want to share
> > cyberspace with someone like him.
>
> > Boon
>
> Do you happen to have a link to the very beginning of the whole KP thing?

Arny's been busy deleting his own posts in the archive, so the chance
of getting a comprehensive view of the incident is now difficult at
best. You also have to remember that there were two phases to the
incident--the first phase where Arny describes the email in detail
(and garners sympathy from many here) to the second phase where it is
proven that he forged the headers and invented the whole thing. I
believe that the two phases are separated by a couple of years.

I'm sure you can probably dive in anywhere and uncover links to the
origins of this incident. I know Terry (TT) was able to uncover a lot
of it just a few months ago. But to tell you the truth, I don't want
to start digging around for the umpteenth time. Debating trade tricks
aside, it does nauseate me to keep dealing with it. I'd love to
forget about the whole thing (remember, I managed to ignore Arny for
at least a year the last time this was proposed), but it really
sickens me when Arny starts trying to uncover facts about my personal
life. I know what kind of person he is, and the less he knows about
any of us, the better.

Boon

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Dec 30, 11:29?am, Jenn > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ?Boon > wrote:
> > > On Dec 30, 8:54?am, Jenn > wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > ?"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > >, "Arny
> > > > > > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > > > >
> > > > > >>> In article
> > > > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> > > > > >>>> message
> > > > >
> > > > > >>>>.com
> > > > > >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
> >
> > > > > >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
> >
> > > > > >>>> What's to be depressed about?
> >
> > > > > >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > > > > >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
> >
> > > > > >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> > > > > >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> > > > > >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, ?we
> > > > > >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> > > > > >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> > > > > >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
> >
> > > > > >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
> >
> > > > > >> Define high road.
> >
> > > > > > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
> >
> > > > > As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite
> > > > > topic
> > > > > among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
> >
> > > > I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they know that. ?So
> > > > why not take the high road?
> >
> > > The high road involves NOT bringing it up in the first place.
> > > Personally, I never bring it up, I only react because it sickens me.
> > > My animosity towards Arny started with the original email. ?As a
> > > father, it upset me to learn that someone sent Arny this material.
> > > When I found out that Arny falsified headers and made the whole
> > > incident up, all bets were off. ?If this was never brought up again,
> > > I'd be happy. ?I've said so many times in the past. ?But it does get
> > > brought up over and over, and when you go through the archives, you'll
> > > find that Arny is behind it a majority of the time. Once it is brought
> > > up, Arny has to engage in the debating trade and argue point by point,
> > > extending the subject indefinitely.
> >
> > > Of course this could all be alleviated if Arny would just leave the
> > > group. I think everyone's point is that we don't want to share
> > > cyberspace with someone like him.
> >
> > > Boon
> >
> > Do you happen to have a link to the very beginning of the whole KP thing?
>
> Arny's been busy deleting his own posts in the archive, so the chance
> of getting a comprehensive view of the incident is now difficult at
> best. You also have to remember that there were two phases to the
> incident--the first phase where Arny describes the email in detail
> (and garners sympathy from many here) to the second phase where it is
> proven that he forged the headers and invented the whole thing. I
> believe that the two phases are separated by a couple of years.
>
> I'm sure you can probably dive in anywhere and uncover links to the
> origins of this incident. I know Terry (TT) was able to uncover a lot
> of it just a few months ago. But to tell you the truth, I don't want
> to start digging around for the umpteenth time. Debating trade tricks
> aside, it does nauseate me to keep dealing with it. I'd love to
> forget about the whole thing (remember, I managed to ignore Arny for
> at least a year the last time this was proposed), but it really
> sickens me when Arny starts trying to uncover facts about my personal
> life. I know what kind of person he is, and the less he knows about
> any of us, the better.
>
> Boon

Understood.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > >>>> Define high road.

> > >>> The road that the whole KP thing is not on.

> > Still waiting for that statement about what the high road is.

> Look ... up.

Jenn, Jenn, poor naive Jenn. Have you learned nothing of the "debating
trade"? If Mr. **** were to grant that you have offered a "definition", he
would be voluntarily sacrificing at least five rounds of pointless
repetition. Shame on you, Mistress, for making such an unreasonable demand
on DebatingTradeBorg.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > > Even if the photographs weren't pornographic, Arny's descriptions of
> > > them were.
> >
> > There were no photographs. GOIA made the whole thing up.
>
> I know, but could a case by made for the descriptions?

A case for having Turdborg confined to a room with soft walls, maybe.

> After all, I found them very disturbing and upsetting since they
> contained graphic details of deviant sexual practices.

Arnii has difficulty matching appropriate behavior to social contexts.
Which personality disorder does that invoke?

> There's a legal basis for this.
> It doesn't even matter if the pics were real or not.

Did you hear about the DSM-V kerfuffle? The long arm of the pharmaceutical
companies is poised to corrupt the psychiatrists' bible.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > Still waiting for some guidance on how to lead an ethical, productive life.

> That's a pity.

Even the most humane among us can get fed up with Arnii Krooger. Still,
getting kicked out of church has to be nearly impossible. Maybe somebody in
Goose Puke Bupkus Chruch™ got clued in to the "Usenet Krooger" and raised
a stink. I'm sure a lot of Mr. ****'s posts would disqualify him from doing
"God's" work.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> Of course this could all be alleviated if Arny would just leave the
> group. I think everyone's point is that we don't want to share
> cyberspace with someone like him.

Actually, the solution to the Krooger Problem is quite simple: Don't reply
to his posts and don't engage him at all.

Mistress, you're the only one left who harbors a serious hope that Turdborg
will respond like a human being if you shower him with empathy and
kindness. If you could just divorce yourself from that fantasy, you'd find
it a lot easier to do the necessary.

[Boon]

On Dec 30, 12:34�pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Boon said:
>
> > > > Even if the photographs weren't pornographic, Arny's descriptions of
> > > > them were.
>
> > > There were no photographs. GOIA made the whole thing up.
>
> > I know, but could a case by made for the descriptions? �
>
> A case for having Turdborg confined to a room with soft walls, maybe.

I'll start drafting a proposal.

>
> > After all, I found them very disturbing and upsetting since they
> > contained graphic details of deviant sexual practices.
>
> Arnii has difficulty matching appropriate behavior to social contexts.
> Which personality disorder does that invoke?

All of them, plus autism and schizophrenia.

>
> > There's a legal basis for this.
> > It doesn't even matter if the pics were real or not.
>
> Did you hear about the DSM-V kerfuffle? The long arm of the pharmaceutical
> companies is poised to corrupt the psychiatrists' bible.

No, I didn't. Then again, too many mental health professionals would
rather medicate than talk.

Boon

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message


> Look 4 paragraphs up.

Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost fixing the Middiot himself
is not my job.

[Boon]

On Dec 30, 12:40�pm, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Boon said:
>
> > Of course this could all be alleviated if Arny would just leave the
> > group. I think everyone's point is that we don't want to share
> > cyberspace with someone like him.
>
> Actually, the solution to the Krooger Problem is quite simple: Don't reply
> to his posts and don't engage him at all.

Unfortunately, he's discovered my weak spot...my inability to ignore
really, really stupid posts.

Boon

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Boon said:
>
> > Of course this could all be alleviated if Arny would just leave the
> > group. I think everyone's point is that we don't want to share
> > cyberspace with someone like him.
>
> Actually, the solution to the Krooger Problem is quite simple: Don't reply
> to his posts and don't engage him at all.

I agree. I've called for that in the past. Why don't YOU take the high
road and lead that effort by not replying, not engaging, and not
referring to him?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > > Of course this could all be alleviated if Arny would just leave the
> > > group. I think everyone's point is that we don't want to share
> > > cyberspace with someone like him.
> >
> > Actually, the solution to the Krooger Problem is quite simple: Don't reply
> > to his posts and don't engage him at all.
>
> I agree. I've called for that in the past. Why don't YOU take the high
> road and lead that effort by not replying, not engaging, and not
> referring to him?

How naive you are, Mistress. We've been down this road many times before.
You're the one who keeps indulging him. You're the one who keeps hoping you
can seduce him with kindness.

I have participated in the ignoring ritual. Several times, in fact. But
it's always undone by some goody two-shoes like you who insists on trying
to "reward" Mr. **** for making a worthwhile post. That's all the Beast
needs, you know. Once you let him back into a conversation, it's open
season for "debating trade" crapola.

How about you lead the way? Krooger has taken what you call "the high road"
by not answering most of *my* posts. You should give him some credit for
that.

I will always talk about Turdborg as long as he posts here. Accept that as
a given. Choose what *you* can do in order to lessen the impact of
Kroofulness on the group.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Jenn said:
>
> > > > Of course this could all be alleviated if Arny would just leave the
> > > > group. I think everyone's point is that we don't want to share
> > > > cyberspace with someone like him.
> > >
> > > Actually, the solution to the Krooger Problem is quite simple: Don't reply
> > > to his posts and don't engage him at all.
> >
> > I agree. I've called for that in the past. Why don't YOU take the high
> > road and lead that effort by not replying, not engaging, and not
> > referring to him?
>
> How naive you are, Mistress. We've been down this road many times before.
> You're the one who keeps indulging him. You're the one who keeps hoping you
> can seduce him with kindness.
>
> I have participated in the ignoring ritual. Several times, in fact. But
> it's always undone by some goody two-shoes like you who insists on trying
> to "reward" Mr. **** for making a worthwhile post. That's all the Beast
> needs, you know. Once you let him back into a conversation, it's open
> season for "debating trade" crapola.
>
> How about you lead the way? Krooger has taken what you call "the high road"
> by not answering most of *my* posts. You should give him some credit for
> that.
>
> I will always talk about Turdborg as long as he posts here. Accept that as
> a given. Choose what *you* can do in order to lessen the impact of
> Kroofulness on the group.

I agree that for me to respond to him is foolish. Ignoring his trolls
is difficult; he's good at it. But certainly you know that if any of us
(including you) talk about him, he will respond. If the goal is to get
him out of here, you doom your efforts by talking about him at all.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
> > Look 4 paragraphs up.
>
> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost fixing the Middiot himself
> is not my job.

Not participating in the KP discussions is not "fixing" anybody, it's
simply stopping the discussion. Do you want that to happen?

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
>>
>> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost fixing
>> the Middiot himself is not my job.
>
> Not participating in the KP discussions is not "fixing"
> anybody, it's simply stopping the discussion. Do you
> want that to happen?

You think that not participating will help?

LOL!

[Arny Krueger]

"George M. Middius" > wrote in
message

> I have participated in the ignoring ritual. Several
> times, in fact.

A blatant lie.

Several of us ignored the Middiot for over a year straight. Had zero effect
on his blather.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 30, 3:03*pm, Jenn > wrote:

> I agree that for me to respond to him is foolish. *Ignoring his trolls
> is difficult; he's good at it. *But certainly you know that if any of us
> (including you) talk about him, he will respond. *If the goal is to get
> him out of here, you doom your efforts by talking about him at all.

I personally enjoy poking around in his 'mind'. I confess that I find
human insanity absolutely fascinating.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>
> >>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
> >>
> >> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost fixing
> >> the Middiot himself is not my job.
> >
> > Not participating in the KP discussions is not "fixing"
> > anybody, it's simply stopping the discussion. Do you
> > want that to happen?
>
> You think that not participating will help?
>
> LOL!

It might be a start, but in any event, if you don't participate, you are
taking the higher moral ground.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 30, 3:39*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in
> messagenews:2o2ll4looks0oidn5bfgratas36tq7l9i1@4ax .com
>
> > I have participated in the ignoring ritual. Several
> > times, in fact.
>
> A blatant lie.

Prove that Geerge has replied to you consistently with no breaks,
GOIA.

If you cannot, then you should stop making insane claims like this.

> Several of us ignored the Middiot for over a year straight. Had zero effect
> on his blather.

And several have likewise ignored your insane ramblings. Face it: you
can't live without sowing discord on RAO.

You've ruined this group.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 30, 3:38*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
> >>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
>
> >> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost fixing
> >> the Middiot himself is not my job.
>
> > Not participating in the KP discussions is not "fixing"
> > anybody, it's simply stopping the discussion. *Do you
> > want that to happen?
>
> You think that not participating will help?

Do you think you'd get so whipped up if you weren't here, GOIA?

> LOL!

Agreed.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
>>>>
>>>> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost fixing
>>>> the Middiot himself is not my job.
>>>
>>> Not participating in the KP discussions is not "fixing"
>>> anybody, it's simply stopping the discussion. Do you
>>> want that to happen?
>>
>> You think that not participating will help?
>>
>> LOL!
>
> It might be a start,

I wasn't even a start the last time it was tried.

> but in any event, if you don't
> participate, you are taking the higher moral ground.

Back some years, several of us banded together and totally ignored a short
list of flaming idiots including the Middiot.

We did that for almost 2 years straight. Had zero effect on the noise level,
the targeted individual's behavior, etc.

At this point RAO is little but noise level. Even less motivation to
practice any self-control at all.

Jenn, I'll bet that you can't tell when I was away for about 2 weeks in a
row a number of weeks back, except by searching on my posts and noticing
when there weren't any.

[Arny Krueger]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
wrote in message

> On Dec 30, 3:39 pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "George M. Middius" > wrote in
>> messagenews:2o2ll4looks0oidn5bfgratas36tq7l9i1@4ax .com
>>
>>> I have participated in the ignoring ritual. Several
>>> times, in fact.

>> A blatant lie.

> Prove that Geerge has replied to you consistently with no
> breaks, GOIA.

Excluded middle argument.

> If you cannot, then you should stop making insane claims
> like this.

Yet another nonsense demand.

>> Several of us ignored the Middiot for over a year
>> straight. Had zero effect on his blather.

> And several have likewise ignored your insane ramblings.

Really?

Sure you weren't incarcerated at the time?

> Face it: you can't live without sowing discord on RAO.

Plenty of evidence that there is undending discord, whether I post here or
not.

> You've ruined this group.

LOL!

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost fixing
> >>>> the Middiot himself is not my job.
> >>>
> >>> Not participating in the KP discussions is not "fixing"
> >>> anybody, it's simply stopping the discussion. Do you
> >>> want that to happen?
> >>
> >> You think that not participating will help?
> >>
> >> LOL!
> >
> > It might be a start,
>
> I wasn't even a start the last time it was tried.
>
> > but in any event, if you don't
> > participate, you are taking the higher moral ground.
>
> Back some years, several of us banded together and totally ignored a short
> list of flaming idiots including the Middiot.
>
> We did that for almost 2 years straight. Had zero effect on the noise level,
> the targeted individual's behavior, etc.
>
> At this point RAO is little but noise level. Even less motivation to
> practice any self-control at all.
>
> Jenn, I'll bet that you can't tell when I was away for about 2 weeks in a
> row a number of weeks back, except by searching on my posts and noticing
> when there weren't any.

Yes, I noticed, but all of the above is beside the point. Do you want
to take the moral high ground or not?

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost
>>>>>> fixing the Middiot himself is not my job.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not participating in the KP discussions is not
>>>>> "fixing" anybody, it's simply stopping the
>>>>> discussion. Do you want that to happen?
>>>>
>>>> You think that not participating will help?
>>>>
>>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> It might be a start,
>>
>> I wasn't even a start the last time it was tried.
>>
>>> but in any event, if you don't
>>> participate, you are taking the higher moral ground.
>>
>> Back some years, several of us banded together and
>> totally ignored a short list of flaming idiots including
>> the Middiot.
>>
>> We did that for almost 2 years straight. Had zero effect
>> on the noise level, the targeted individual's behavior,
>> etc.
>>
>> At this point RAO is little but noise level. Even less
>> motivation to practice any self-control at all.
>>
>> Jenn, I'll bet that you can't tell when I was away for
>> about 2 weeks in a row a number of weeks back, except by
>> searching on my posts and noticing when there weren't
>> any.

> Yes, I noticed, but all of the above is beside the point.
> Do you want to take the moral high ground or not?

I've been there all along Jenn.

But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the Middiot posse, and
so will I.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost
> >>>>>> fixing the Middiot himself is not my job.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Not participating in the KP discussions is not
> >>>>> "fixing" anybody, it's simply stopping the
> >>>>> discussion. Do you want that to happen?
> >>>>
> >>>> You think that not participating will help?
> >>>>
> >>>> LOL!
> >>>
> >>> It might be a start,
> >>
> >> I wasn't even a start the last time it was tried.
> >>
> >>> but in any event, if you don't
> >>> participate, you are taking the higher moral ground.
> >>
> >> Back some years, several of us banded together and
> >> totally ignored a short list of flaming idiots including
> >> the Middiot.
> >>
> >> We did that for almost 2 years straight. Had zero effect
> >> on the noise level, the targeted individual's behavior,
> >> etc.
> >>
> >> At this point RAO is little but noise level. Even less
> >> motivation to practice any self-control at all.
> >>
> >> Jenn, I'll bet that you can't tell when I was away for
> >> about 2 weeks in a row a number of weeks back, except by
> >> searching on my posts and noticing when there weren't
> >> any.
>
> > Yes, I noticed, but all of the above is beside the point.
> > Do you want to take the moral high ground or not?
>
> I've been there all along Jenn.

It's difficult to claim the moral high ground when you participate in
the mud slinging.

>
> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the Middiot posse, and
> so will I.

If you mean George and Shhhh, what do you suppose is the percentage is
of my posts to them vs. yours?

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the Middiot posse, and
> so will I.

OK, I won't respond to them on other than audio or musical matters, and
you do the same. Great!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

> > I will always talk about Turdborg as long as he posts here. Accept that as
> > a given. Choose what *you* can do in order to lessen the impact of
> > Kroofulness on the group.
>
> I agree that for me to respond to him is foolish. Ignoring his trolls
> is difficult; he's good at it. But certainly you know that if any of us
> (including you) talk about him, he will respond. If the goal is to get
> him out of here, you doom your efforts by talking about him at all.

I don't care if he talks about me. I overmatch him easily in insults,
comedy, mockery -- you name it. The goal should be to get Krooger out of
audio discussions, and ignore him when he tries to hijack them.

A friendly word of advice: When you feel the irresistible urge to reply to
one of Turdborg's trolls, set aside your humanity and embrace a different
tactic. You have to be ruthless. Pretend you're exterminating a colony of
bedbugs or something.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Mistress, did you see this?

> > I have participated in the ignoring ritual. Several
> > times, in fact.

> A blatant lie.

This is how Krazy Krooger starts his ritual. He accuses somebody of lying.
I could deny it, but I know how the Beast's game plan is mapped. If
somebody else made the accusation and I had any expectation of reaching any
kind of agreement on the facts, I'd ask for evidence. But since the klaim
of "lie" was made by the Krooborg, I know it's futile to ask for evidence.
All Turdborg wants is for somebody to reply to his post and engage him in
an argument. That is the reward Mr. **** seeks.

Arnii, kindly go **** yourself. I don't care how many times you accuse me
of "lying" or any other figments of your demented 'mind'. After you finsih
the autocopuulation, please be so kind as to step in front of a speeding
bus. TIA.

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message

> In article
> >, "Arny
> Krueger" > wrote:
>
>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>
>>> In article
>>> >, "Arny
>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>> In article
>>>>> >, "Arny
>>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> >,
>>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost
>>>>>>>> fixing the Middiot himself is not my job.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not participating in the KP discussions is not
>>>>>>> "fixing" anybody, it's simply stopping the
>>>>>>> discussion. Do you want that to happen?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You think that not participating will help?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>> It might be a start,
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't even a start the last time it was tried.
>>>>
>>>>> but in any event, if you don't
>>>>> participate, you are taking the higher moral ground.
>>>>
>>>> Back some years, several of us banded together and
>>>> totally ignored a short list of flaming idiots
>>>> including the Middiot.
>>>>
>>>> We did that for almost 2 years straight. Had zero
>>>> effect on the noise level, the targeted individual's
>>>> behavior, etc.
>>>>
>>>> At this point RAO is little but noise level. Even less
>>>> motivation to practice any self-control at all.
>>>>
>>>> Jenn, I'll bet that you can't tell when I was away for
>>>> about 2 weeks in a row a number of weeks back, except
>>>> by searching on my posts and noticing when there
>>>> weren't any.
>>
>>> Yes, I noticed, but all of the above is beside the
>>> point. Do you want to take the moral high ground or not?
>>
>> I've been there all along Jenn.
>
> It's difficult to claim the moral high ground when you
> participate in the mud slinging.

Oh, let me dodge that piece of mud.

>> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the
>> Middiot posse, and so will I.

> If you mean George and Shhhh, what do you suppose is the
> percentage is of my posts to them vs. yours?

You respond to them much more than I.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 30, 3:51*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> wrote in
>
> > On Dec 30, 3:39 pm, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "George M. Middius" > wrote in
> >> messagenews:2o2ll4looks0oidn5bfgratas36tq7l9i1@4ax .com
>
> >>> I have participated in the ignoring ritual. Several
> >>> times, in fact.
> >> A blatant lie.
> > Prove that Geerge has replied to you consistently with no
> > breaks, GOIA.
>
> Excluded middle argument.

Your claim was that George had not ignored you in the past. I ask you
to prove that he hasn't.

> > If you cannot, then you should stop making insane claims
> > like this.
>
> Yet another nonsense demand.

From a nonsense claim by you.

> >> Several of us ignored the Middiot for over a year
> >> straight. Had zero effect on his blather.
> > And several have likewise ignored your insane ramblings.
>
> Really?

Yup.

> Sure you weren't incarcerated at the time?

Are you sure that you're sane, GOIA? If so, can you prove it? LOL!

> > Face it: you can't live without sowing discord on RAO.
>
> Plenty of evidence that there is undending discord, whether I post here or
> not.

I'd say it's pretty clear that a lot, if not most of it, revolves
around you. Insane assholes tend to have that affect on normal people.

> > You've ruined this group.
>
> LOL!

Prove that you haven't. LOL!

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost
> >>>>>>>> fixing the Middiot himself is not my job.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Not participating in the KP discussions is not
> >>>>>>> "fixing" anybody, it's simply stopping the
> >>>>>>> discussion. Do you want that to happen?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You think that not participating will help?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LOL!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It might be a start,
> >>>>
> >>>> I wasn't even a start the last time it was tried.
> >>>>
> >>>>> but in any event, if you don't
> >>>>> participate, you are taking the higher moral ground.
> >>>>
> >>>> Back some years, several of us banded together and
> >>>> totally ignored a short list of flaming idiots
> >>>> including the Middiot.
> >>>>
> >>>> We did that for almost 2 years straight. Had zero
> >>>> effect on the noise level, the targeted individual's
> >>>> behavior, etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> At this point RAO is little but noise level. Even less
> >>>> motivation to practice any self-control at all.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jenn, I'll bet that you can't tell when I was away for
> >>>> about 2 weeks in a row a number of weeks back, except
> >>>> by searching on my posts and noticing when there
> >>>> weren't any.
> >>
> >>> Yes, I noticed, but all of the above is beside the
> >>> point. Do you want to take the moral high ground or not?
> >>
> >> I've been there all along Jenn.
> >
> > It's difficult to claim the moral high ground when you
> > participate in the mud slinging.
>
> Oh, let me dodge that piece of mud.

No mud involved, but let's not go with your technique here. Let's stay
on task.

>
> >> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the
> >> Middiot posse, and so will I.
>
> > If you mean George and Shhhh, what do you suppose is the
> > percentage is of my posts to them vs. yours?
>
> You respond to them much more than I.

Hmmm, must be the new math. At any rate, do you pledge to not post to
them except on audio and music issues if I do the same?

[Arny Krueger]

"Jenn" > wrote in message


>>>> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the
>>>> Middiot posse, and so will I.
>>
>>> If you mean George and Shhhh, what do you suppose is the
>>> percentage is of my posts to them vs. yours?
>>
>> You respond to them much more than I.

> Hmmm, must be the new math.

No, its reality.

> At any rate, do you pledge
> to not post to them except on audio and music issues if I
> do the same?

Include Art and Boon and its a deal.

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article >,
"Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
> >>>> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the
> >>>> Middiot posse, and so will I.
> >>
> >>> If you mean George and Shhhh, what do you suppose is the
> >>> percentage is of my posts to them vs. yours?
> >>
> >> You respond to them much more than I.
>
> > Hmmm, must be the new math.
>
> No, its reality.

If I wanted to play the game with you, I would say, "prove it". But I
don't so I won't.

>
> > At any rate, do you pledge
> > to not post to them except on audio and music issues if I
> > do the same?
>
> Include Art and Boon and its a deal.

Sure.

[Clyde Slick]

On 30 Dec, 11:54, Jenn > wrote:
> In article >,
> *"Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> > > In article
> > > >, "Arny
> > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > >>> In article
> > >>> >, "Arny
> > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> > >>>> message
> >
> > >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> > >>>> What's to be depressed about?
>
> > >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> > >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> > >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> > >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, *we
> > >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> > >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> > >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
>
> > >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> > >> Define high road.
>
> > > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> > As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> > among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
>
> I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they know that. *So
> why not take the high road?-

Waht's the problem?
We are bringing up something that doesn't exist.
Just to show that Arny made up a very nasty story.

there ain't no such thing as the KP email.

[Clyde Slick]

On 30 Dec, 13:44, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>>>> message
>
> >>>>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> >>>>>> What's to be depressed about?
>
> >>>>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> >>>>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> >>>>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> >>>>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot
> >>>>>> Posse, often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with
> >>>>>> them, *we have a suggestion that he was the
> >>>>>> originator of the tragic email. He's just trying to
> >>>>>> retread it almost 10 years later, for grins and
> >>>>>> giggles.
>
> >>>>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> >>>> Define high road.
>
> >>> The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> >> As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is
> >> a favorite topic among your good buddies in the Middiot
> >> Posse.
>
> > I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they
> > know that. *So why not take the high road?
>
> Still waiting for that statement about what the high road is.-


It's callled the ****sville Bypass.

[Clyde Slick]

On 30 Dec, 14:27, Boon > wrote:
> On Dec 30, 8:54 am, Jenn > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article >,
> > "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> > > > In article
> > > > >, "Arny
> > > > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
> > >
> > > >>> In article
> > > >>> >, "Arny
> > > >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > >>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> > > >>>> message
> > >
> > > >>>>> On 29 Dec, 01:06, wrote:
>
> > > >>>>>> Krueger is depressingly normal.
>
> > > >>>> What's to be depressed about?
>
> > > >>>>> You must be getting "at least" a couple of
> > > >>>>> false KP accusations each day, in your normal world.
>
> > > >>>> The false KP accusations are generally like this one,
> > > >>>> coming from some demented member of the Middiot Posse,
> > > >>>> often Art himself. As obsessed as Art is with them, we
> > > >>>> have a suggestion that he was the originator of the
> > > >>>> tragic email. He's just trying to retread it almost 10
> > > >>>> years later, for grins and giggles.
>
> > > >>> Why don't you take the high road on this Arny?
>
> > > >> Define high road.
>
> > > > The road that the whole KP thing is not on.
>
> > > As you have seen repeatedly Jenn, the whole KP thing is a favorite topic
> > > among your good buddies in the Middiot Posse.
>
> > I don't like it when they bring it up either, and they know that. So
> > why not take the high road?
>
> The high road involves NOT bringing it up in the first place.
> Personally, I never bring it up, I only react because it sickens me.
> My animosity towards Arny started with the original email. *As a
> father, it upset me to learn that someone sent Arny this material.
> When I found out that Arny falsified headers and made the whole
> incident up, all bets were off. *

the more salient point is that he falsified the content.

[Clyde Slick]

On 30 Dec, 15:34, George M. Middius > wrote:


>
> Did you hear about the DSM-V kerfuffle? The long arm of the pharmaceutical
> companies is poised to corrupt the psychiatrists' bible.


No, could you elaborate, please?

[Clyde Slick]

On 30 Dec, 19:02, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the
> >>>> Middiot posse, and so will I.
>
> >>> If you mean George and Shhhh, what do you suppose is the
> >>> percentage is of my posts to them vs. yours?
>
> >> You respond to them much more than I.
> > Hmmm, must be the new math.
>
> No, its reality.
>
> > *At any rate, do you pledge
> > to not post to them except on audio and music issues if I
> > do the same?
>
> Include Art and Boon and its a deal.


LOL!!!!
been there, done that

[Boon]

On Dec 30, 4:02�pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the
> >>>> Middiot posse, and so will I.
>
> >>> If you mean George and Shhhh, what do you suppose is the
> >>> percentage is of my posts to them vs. yours?
>
> >> You respond to them much more than I.
> > Hmmm, must be the new math.
>
> No, its reality.
>
> > �At any rate, do you pledge
> > to not post to them except on audio and music issues if I
> > do the same?
>
> Include Art and Boon and its a deal.

I always try to engage Jenn on musical matters. Nothing will change.

Boon

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

> > > ?At any rate, do you pledge
> > > to not post to them except on audio and music issues if I
> > > do the same?
> >
> > Include Art and Boon and its a deal.
>
> I always try to engage Jenn on musical matters. Nothing will change.

"Music is irrelevant to audio." -- A. Krooger, 2007

[Jenn[_3_]]

In article
>,
Boon > wrote:

> On Dec 30, 4:02?pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> > "Jenn" > wrote in message
> >
> >
> >
> > >>>> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the
> > >>>> Middiot posse, and so will I.
> >
> > >>> If you mean George and Shhhh, what do you suppose is the
> > >>> percentage is of my posts to them vs. yours?
> >
> > >> You respond to them much more than I.
> > > Hmmm, must be the new math.
> >
> > No, its reality.
> >
> > > ?At any rate, do you pledge
> > > to not post to them except on audio and music issues if I
> > > do the same?
> >
> > Include Art and Boon and its a deal.
>
> I always try to engage Jenn on musical matters. Nothing will change.
>
> Boon

Cool!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 30, 5:38*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > >, "Arny
> > Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>> In article
> >>> >, "Arny
> >>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> >, "Arny
> >>>>> Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
> >>>>>>> In article
> >>>>>>> >,
> >>>>>>> "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> "Jenn" > wrote in message
>
>
> >>>>>>>>> Look 4 paragraphs up.
>
> >>>>>>>> Fixing the Middiot posse, and first and foremost
> >>>>>>>> fixing the Middiot himself is not my job.
>
> >>>>>>> Not participating in the KP discussions is not
> >>>>>>> "fixing" anybody, it's simply stopping the
> >>>>>>> discussion. *Do you want that to happen?
>
> >>>>>> You think that not participating will help?
>
> >>>>>> LOL!
>
> >>>>> It might be a start,
>
> >>>> I wasn't even a start *the last time it was tried.
>
> >>>>> but in any event, if you don't
> >>>>> participate, you are taking the higher moral ground.
>
> >>>> Back some years, several of us banded together and
> >>>> totally ignored a short list of flaming idiots
> >>>> including the Middiot.
>
> >>>> We did that for almost 2 years straight. Had zero
> >>>> effect on the noise level, the targeted individual's
> >>>> behavior, etc.
>
> >>>> At this point RAO is little but noise level. Even less
> >>>> motivation to practice any self-control at all.
>
> >>>> Jenn, I'll bet that you can't tell when I was away for
> >>>> about 2 weeks in a row a number of weeks back, except
> >>>> by searching on my posts and noticing when there
> >>>> weren't any.
>
> >>> Yes, I noticed, but all of the above is beside the
> >>> point. Do you want to take the moral high ground or not?
>
> >> I've been there all along Jenn.
>
> > It's difficult to claim the moral high ground when you
> > participate in the mud slinging.
>
> Oh, let me dodge that piece of mud.
>
> >> But I'll tell you what Jenn, you stop responding to the
> >> Middiot posse, and so will I.
> > If you mean George and Shhhh, what do you suppose is the
> > percentage is of my posts to them vs. yours?
>
> You respond to them much more than I.

Liar.