Only the mentally defective discuss Arny

[[email protected]]

It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're the ones who
continually go after Arny. A higher class of people simply regard him
for what he is and move on quietly.


If Arny were capable of tracking down some of these idiots and he
pulled out a .45 and shot them dead I'd say they got what they
deserved.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 25, 9:05*pm, wrote:
> *It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're the ones who
> continually go after Arny. A higher class of people simply regard him
> for what he is and move on quietly.
>
> *If Arny were capable of tracking down some of these idiots and he
> pulled out a .45 and shot them dead I'd say they got what they
> deserved.

And people wonder why you might choose to remain anonymous on the
Usenet. There are sickos like this out there.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

> > *If Arny were capable of tracking down some of these idiots and he
> > pulled out a .45 and shot them dead I'd say they got what they
> > deserved.
>
> And people wonder why you might choose to remain anonymous on the
> Usenet. There are sickos like this out there.

Are you aware you're talking to Bratzi's alter-ego?

[Arny Krueger]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
wrote in message


>> It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're the ones who
>> continually go after Arny.

> And people wonder why one might choose to remain
> anonymous on the Usenet.

Right, being anonymous allows you to express your sickness on RAO.

[Arny Krueger]

"Soundhaspriority" > wrote in message

> article

> At last! I had the king of evil in my own home! And
> what did I do! I **** myself! Damn, I wish I had some
> balls.
>
> Meanwhile he got the complete layout to my home, knows my
> habits, probably put a bug on my telephone lines. He's
> truly a great man, and I'm truly a mouse.

Now, that's sick! :-(

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 26, 4:55*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> wrote in
>
> >> It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're the ones who
> >> continually go after Arny.
> > And people wonder why one might choose to remain
> > anonymous on the Usenet.
>
> Right, being anonymous allows you to express your sickness on RAO.

Only the insane would've snipped the death threat and ignored its
implications.

GOIA's insanity presents another reason to remain anonymous.

[Arny Krueger]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
wrote in message

> On Dec 26, 4:55 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
>> wrote in
>>
>>
>>>> It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're
>>>> the ones who continually go after Arny.
>>> And people wonder why one might choose to remain
>>> anonymous on the Usenet.
>>
>> Right, being anonymous allows you to express your
>> sickness on RAO.
>
> Only the insane would've snipped the death threat and
> ignored its implications.

I guess I'm not paranoid and delusional enough to see any death threat.

****R, you say you saw a credible threat on your life?

How can there be a threat on your life, when there is no identifiable "you"?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 26, 8:55*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> wrote in
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 26, 4:55 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> >> wrote in
> >>
>
> >>>> It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're
> >>>> the ones who continually go after Arny.
> >>> And people wonder why one might choose to remain
> >>> anonymous on the Usenet.
>
> >> Right, being anonymous allows you to express your
> >> sickness on RAO.
>
> > Only the insane would've snipped the death threat and
> > ignored its *implications.
>
> I guess I'm not paranoid and delusional enough to see any death threat.

Hm. Saying that killing someone would be justified is normal dialogue
for you I suppose.? I think you're a POS but I've never threatened to
gun you down, nor would I see that as something you "deserve".

If you did it to yourself that would be different.

> ****R, you say you saw a credible threat on your life?

Nope. What I said I saw were the words of somebody who's clearly not
mentally balanced. Actually, if you'll recall, I said that I saw TWO
people who aren't mentally balanced. And that because there are people
like these two individuals on the Usenet, staying anonymous is
justified.

> How can there be a threat on your life, when there is no identifiable "you"?

I refuse to participate in your strawman arguments, GOIA.

[Arny Krueger]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
wrote in message

> On Dec 26, 8:55 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
>> wrote in
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 26, 4:55 am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>>>> > wrote in
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> It's self-evident who the diseased people are.
>>>>>> Thay're the ones who continually go after Arny.
>>>>> And people wonder why one might choose to remain
>>>>> anonymous on the Usenet.
>>
>>>> Right, being anonymous allows you to express your
>>>> sickness on RAO.
>>
>>> Only the insane would've snipped the death threat and
>>> ignored its implications.
>>
>> I guess I'm not paranoid and delusional enough to see
>> any death threat.

> Hm. Saying that killing someone would be justified is
> normal dialogue for you I suppose.?

It's normal dialogue depending on context. Do you have a clue about context,
****R?

>I think you're a POS

That's never normal dialogue in my life, but unlike you ****R I hang with
people who are at least polite.

> but I've never threatened to gun you down,

No, but Marc (that self-proclaimed picture of normalicy) did.

> nor would I see that as something you "deserve".

In the origional context, most normal humans would interpret it as a figure
of speech. But then ****R, then there is you. Not normal on at least two
grounds - you felt threatened by a non-uncommon figure of speech, and you
are generally incapable of expressing yourself politely.

> If you did it to yourself that would be different.

More abnormal behaviour on your part, ****R. Most normal people wish no harm
to anybody, self-inflicted or otherwise.

>> ****R, you say you saw a credible threat on your life?

> Nope.

Oh, you were just acting out.

> What I said I saw were the words of somebody who's
> clearly not mentally balanced.

And how can you be a credible judge of that ****R, given your constantly
egregious behavior around here?

> Actually, if you'll recall, I said that I saw TWO
> people who aren't mentally balanced.

I'll read that as "Not balanced like ****R", which is actually pretty
meaningless.

> And that because there are people
> like these two individuals on the Usenet, staying anonymous is
> justified.

Speaks to your paranoia ****R, and also your habitual deceit. One important
reason why you need to stay anonymous is because it gives you the license to
act in antisocial ways, virtually all the time.

>> How can there be a threat on your life, when there is no
>> identifiable "you"?

> I refuse to participate in your strawman arguments, GOIA.

****R, since there is no identifiable you, *you* are a straw man.

Enjoy your non-existence! ;-)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 26, 10:41*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >

> >> I guess I'm not paranoid and delusional enough to see
> >> any death threat.
> > Hm. Saying that killing someone would be justified is
> > normal dialogue *for you I suppose.?
>
> It's normal dialogue depending on context. Do you have a clue about context,
> Master?

The context is someone saying that hunting people down and killing
them is justified, GOIA. That's not "normal" to most people, but
apparently it is to you.

> >I think you're a POS
>
> That's never normal dialogue in my life, but unlike you, you genius you, I hang with
> people who are at least polite.

So you hang around dishonest, passive-aggressive people, GOIA. That's
not my problem. That would be your problem.

> > but I've never threatened to *gun you down,
>
> No, but Marc (that self-proclaimed picture of normalicy) did.

We aren't talking about him, GOIA. Your insane post is directed at me.

You do understand that, don't you, GOIA?

> > nor would I see that as something you "deserve".
>
> In the origional context, most normal humans would interpret it as a figure
> of speech. But then Master, then there is you. Not normal on at least two
> grounds - you felt threatened by a non-uncommon figure of speech, and you
> are generally incapable of expressing yourself politely.

What is "impolite" about saying that I think you're a POS, GOIA? I
also think the sky is blue and that it's generally warmer in the
summer months.

BTW, this is not "a non-uncommon figure of speech":

"If Arny were capable of tracking down some of these idiots and he
pulled out a .45 and shot them dead I'd say they got what they
deserved."

What that *is* is a strong argument for remaining anonymous. At least
it would be to a sane person. LOL!

> > If you did it to yourself that would be different.
>
> More abnormal behaviour on your part, Master. Most normal people wish no harm
> to anybody, self-inflicted or otherwise.

It's all about choice, GOIA. I did not say that I "wish" you would
shoot yourself. I said that if you chose to do that to yourself then
it is your decision, and there's not much I or anyone else can do
about it. We've already begged you to seek professional help.

Wouldn't you agree that trying to get a terribly sick individual
professional help is "normal", GOIA?

> >> Master, you say you saw a credible threat on your life?
> > Nope.
>
> Oh, you were just acting out.

Nope. What I said was that since there are people out there that feel
like this, staying anonymous is entirely justified.

Please learn to read or have somebody who can explain it to you, GOIA.

> > What I said I saw were the words of somebody who's
> > clearly not *mentally balanced.
>
> And how can you be a credible judge of that Master, given your constantly
> egregious behavior around here?

Being "impolite" and saying that somebody shooting someone is
justified is not the same.

You do understand that, don't you, GOIA? And as I'll prove shortly
stating an obvious truth is not "impolite".

> > Actually, if you'll recall, I said that I saw TWO
> > people who aren't mentally balanced.
>
> I'll read that as "Not balanced like my Master", which is actually pretty
> meaningless.

Read it as you choose to, GOIA. It doesn't affect me one way or the
other. After all, you're a crazy asshole. LOL!

> > And that because there are people
> > like these two individuals on the Usenet, staying anonymous is
> > justified.
>
> Speaks to your paranoia Master, and also your habitual deceit. One important
> reason why you need to stay anonymous is because it gives you the license to
> act in antisocial ways, virtually all the time.

Is that an "important" reason to you, GOIA? I'd say it's more
important to keep the loons, like you and this suckass, at bay.

Besides, telling the truth is not paranoid or polite or impolite or
deceitful. It just "is". Is a clear sky generally blue in your world,
GOIA?

> >> How can there be a threat on your life, when there is no
> >> identifiable "you"?
> > I refuse to participate in your strawman arguments, GOIA.
>
> Master, *since there is no identifiable you, *you* are a straw man.

That's illogical and untrue. I clearly exist. Otherwise you are only
responding to the voices in your head.

Are you responding to the voices in your head again, GOIA?

> Enjoy your non-existence! ;-)

Further proof of your insanity was not required, but it is appreciated
nonetheless. ;-)

[Boon]

On Dec 26, 2:55�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> wrote in
>
> >> It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're the ones who
> >> continually go after Arny.
> > And people wonder why one might choose to remain
> > anonymous on the Usenet.
>
> Right, being anonymous allows you to express your sickness on RAO.

While you express your sickness after letting everyone know your phone
number, address and details about your family. Your point?

Boon

[Boon]

On Dec 26, 8:41�am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> wrote in
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 26, 8:55 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> >> wrote in
> >>
>
> >>> On Dec 26, 4:55 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> >>>> > wrote in
> >>>>
>
> >>>>>> It's self-evident who the diseased people are.
> >>>>>> Thay're the ones who continually go after Arny.
> >>>>> And people wonder why one might choose to remain
> >>>>> anonymous on the Usenet.
>
> >>>> Right, being anonymous allows you to express your
> >>>> sickness on RAO.
>
> >>> Only the insane would've snipped the death threat and
> >>> ignored its implications.
>
> >> I guess I'm not paranoid and delusional enough to see
> >> any death threat.
> > Hm. Saying that killing someone would be justified is
> > normal dialogue �for you I suppose.?
>
> It's normal dialogue depending on context. Do you have a clue about context,
> ****R?
>
> >I think you're a POS
>
> That's never normal dialogue in my life, but unlike you ****R I hang with
> people who are at least polite.
>
> > but I've never threatened to �gun you down,
>
> No, but Marc (that self-proclaimed picture of normalicy) did.

Prove it.

Otherwise, this is just another example of your paranoid personality
disorder.

Boon

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 Dec, 10:21, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 8:55*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> > wrote in
>
> > > On Dec 26, 4:55 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > > wrote:
> > >> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> > >> wrote in
> > >>
>
> > >>>> It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're
> > >>>> the ones who continually go after Arny.
> > >>> And people wonder why one might choose to remain
> > >>> anonymous on the Usenet.
>
> > >> Right, being anonymous allows you to express your
> > >> sickness on RAO.
>
> > > Only the insane would've snipped the death threat and
> > > ignored its *implications.
>
> > I guess I'm not paranoid and delusional enough to see any death threat.
>
> Hm. Saying that killing someone would be justified is normal dialogue
> for you I suppose.? I think you're a POS but I've never threatened to
> gun you down, nor would I see that as something you "deserve".
>

We need a bus

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Dec 26, 12:20*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 26 Dec, 10:21, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Dec 26, 8:55*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> > > wrote in
>
> > > > On Dec 26, 4:55 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> > > >> wrote in
> > > >>
>
> > > >>>> It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're
> > > >>>> the ones who continually go after Arny.
> > > >>> And people wonder why one might choose to remain
> > > >>> anonymous on the Usenet.
>
> > > >> Right, being anonymous allows you to express your
> > > >> sickness on RAO.
>
> > > > Only the insane would've snipped the death threat and
> > > > ignored its *implications.
>
> > > I guess I'm not paranoid and delusional enough to see any death threat.

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 Dec, 13:53, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 12:20*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 26 Dec, 10:21, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > On Dec 26, 8:55*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> > > > wrote in
>
> > > > > On Dec 26, 4:55 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> > > > >> wrote in
> > > > >>
>
> > > > >>>> It's self-evident who the diseased people are. Thay're
> > > > >>>> the ones who continually go after Arny.
> > > > >>> And people wonder why one might choose to remain
> > > > >>> anonymous on the Usenet.
>
> > > > >> Right, being anonymous allows you to express your
> > > > >> sickness on RAO.
>
> > > > > Only the insane would've snipped the death threat and
> > > > > ignored its *implications.
>
> > > > I guess I'm not paranoid and delusional enough to see any death threat.
>
> > > Hm. Saying that killing someone would be justified is normal dialogue
> > > for you I suppose.? I think you're a POS but I've never threatened to
> > > gun you down, nor would I see that as something you "deserve".
>
> > We need a bus
>
> As I said, if GOIA steps in front of a bus that's his choice.-

but somebody has to ensure hat the bus is there.
the more buses that are there, the more the odds are in our favor.

[roughplanet[_2_]]

"Soundhaspriority" > wrote in message
...

article ,
" > wrote...

>> If Arny were capable of tracking down some of these idiots and he
>> pulled out a .45 and shot them dead I'd say they got what they
>> deserved.

> I think you'll find that frequent posters like me are socially inept and
> scared into submission by our own shadows. I had Bwian in my home, poking
> around pretending to be a telephone repairman, and all I could do was
> cower
> at his magnificitude.
>
> At last! I had the king of evil in my own home! And what did I do! I
> ****
> myself! Damn, I wish I had some balls.
>
> Meanwhile he got the complete layout to my home, knows my habits, probably
> put a bug on my telephone lines. He's truly a great man, and I'm truly a
> mouse.
>
> "I don't really have a career, it's a very gnawing thing"

Only the TRULY mentally defective, aka Bwian McCarty discuss people who
discuss Arny. His career as an ice-cream seller is over, and he now hasn't
one.

It's quite a worry to him, with so much time available & only a handful of
dollars from Centrelink to live on. No wonder his posts to this & other
newsgroups have been so prolific of late. With Christmas now with us, and
2009 only a few days away, Bwian has the time to reflect on what he hasn't
achieved in 2008, much the same situation as in 2002, 2003. 2004, 2005, 2006
& 2007, no?

The boredom, tedium & loneliness must be overwhelming Bwian. Why don't YOU
do the Dutch & end it now, before you develop clinical depression & aren't
able to get out of bed?.
I'll even lend you my .308 Norma Magnum, just to make sure there are no
mistakes.

But you have to promise to leave a note in which you admit my ownership of
said rifle, as it's replacement cost is around $5000 these days & I wouldn't
want to lose it. OK?

ruff

[keithr]

roughplanet wrote:
> "Soundhaspriority" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> article ,
> " > wrote...
>
>>> If Arny were capable of tracking down some of these idiots and he
>>> pulled out a .45 and shot them dead I'd say they got what they
>>> deserved.
>
>> I think you'll find that frequent posters like me are socially inept and
>> scared into submission by our own shadows. I had Bwian in my home, poking
>> around pretending to be a telephone repairman, and all I could do was
>> cower
>> at his magnificitude.
>>
>> At last! I had the king of evil in my own home! And what did I do! I
>> ****
>> myself! Damn, I wish I had some balls.
>>
>> Meanwhile he got the complete layout to my home, knows my habits, probably
>> put a bug on my telephone lines. He's truly a great man, and I'm truly a
>> mouse.
>>
>> "I don't really have a career, it's a very gnawing thing"
>
> Only the TRULY mentally defective, aka Bwian McCarty discuss people who
> discuss Arny. His career as an ice-cream seller is over, and he now hasn't
> one.
>
> It's quite a worry to him, with so much time available & only a handful of
> dollars from Centrelink to live on. No wonder his posts to this & other
> newsgroups have been so prolific of late. With Christmas now with us, and
> 2009 only a few days away, Bwian has the time to reflect on what he hasn't
> achieved in 2008, much the same situation as in 2002, 2003. 2004, 2005, 2006
> & 2007, no?
>
> The boredom, tedium & loneliness must be overwhelming Bwian. Why don't YOU
> do the Dutch & end it now, before you develop clinical depression & aren't
> able to get out of bed?.
> I'll even lend you my .308 Norma Magnum, just to make sure there are no
> mistakes.
>
> But you have to promise to leave a note in which you admit my ownership of
> said rifle, as it's replacement cost is around $5000 these days & I wouldn't
> want to lose it. OK?
>
> ruff

Waste of a good gun Ruff, and the ergonomics of using a rifle for the
job are suss to say the least. A sawn off double barreled shottie is
much more suitable, and obtainable at very moderate cost from your local
friendly bikie gang.

Keith

[Mark Harriss]

keithr wrote:
>
> Waste of a good gun Ruff, and the ergonomics of using a rifle for the
> job are suss to say the least. A sawn off double barreled shottie is
> much more suitable, and obtainable at very moderate cost from your local
> friendly bikie gang.
>
> Keith


A guy I know tried to off himself with a 12 gauge and just made
mincemeat of the lower half of his face without killing himself.

[roughplanet[_2_]]

"Mark Harriss" > wrote in message
...

> keithr wrote:

>> Waste of a good gun Ruff, and the ergonomics of using a rifle for the job
>> are suss to say the least. A sawn off double barreled shottie is much
>> more suitable, and obtainable at very moderate cost from your local
>> friendly bikie gang.

> A guy I know tried to off himself with a 12 gauge and just made
> mincemeat of the lower half of his face without killing himself

Put a .308 Norma Magnum in your mouth (loaded of course) and pull the
trigger and I guarantee you won't need to do it a second time.

ruff

[keithr]

Mark Harriss wrote:
> keithr wrote:
>>
>> Waste of a good gun Ruff, and the ergonomics of using a rifle for the
>> job are suss to say the least. A sawn off double barreled shottie is
>> much more suitable, and obtainable at very moderate cost from your
>> local friendly bikie gang.
>>
>> Keith
>
>
> A guy I know tried to off himself with a 12 gauge and just made
> mincemeat of the lower half of his face without killing himself.

Must have used bird shot. 00 or a slug won't leave much to clean up.

[Mark Harriss]

roughplanet wrote:
> Put a .308 Norma Magnum in your mouth (loaded of course) and pull the
> trigger and I guarantee you won't need to do it a second time.
>
> ruff
>
>

That is true, even the shockwave of the passing rifle bullet would
crease the roof of a car. I always like the 6.5 x 55 Mauser round,
very flat trajectory, even used by some Olympic target teams I once
heard.

[[email protected]]

ARnie doesn't post to rec.arts.movies.production.sound nor
probably some of the other groups contained in this cross
posted drivel.
Keep it in rec.audio.opnion where it is relevant to a bunch
of you folks. Nobody else cares.
A man named Jones made some special koolade. Dri it and
stfu!



Google aids and abets spammers!!!

[Eeyore]

Soundhasn'tpriority wrote:

> "I don't really have a career, it's a very gnawing thing"
>
> Brian L. McCarty

You're not kidding Bwian. Shame about Baskin Robbins.