Inga [Archive] - AudioBanter.com

Boon

December 7th 08, 10:25 PM

On Dec 7, 11:45ï¿½am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 7 Dec, 13:07, Boon > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 7, 8:38 am, Jenn > wrote:
>
> > > In article >,
>
> > > "Sophistic" > wrote:
> > > > Jenn gushed:
>
> > > > > My buddy and colleague Inga Swearingen ...
>
> > > > Inga's press kit page mentions Cuesta College
> > > >http://www.ingaswearingen.com/presskit.php
>
> > > > And Googlehttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Cuesta+College.jenn
> > > > coughs up this top link
> > > >http://academic.cuesta.edu/performingarts/bios/jennifer_martin.html
>
> > > > So, now we have a pretty face and sparkling bio to go with the name.. ;-)
>
> > > Hardly a "pretty face", but thanks for the comment on the bio! I need
> > > to have them update it to reflect my new duties there,
>
> > It's the face of an intelligent woman who is artistic as well.
> > Sophomoric is probably just comparing you to the only other women he
> > comes in contact with (teenage Korean girls in massage parlors). ï¿½At
> > any rate, he's "outed" you, even though most of us already knew who
> > you are. ï¿½Perhaps he could start investigating that Atkinson fellow
> > who posts here...I think he works for Stereophile.
>
> > Boon-
>
> I've seen Jenn's picture there a while ago, after she first
> mentioned her position at Cresta.
> Since any body with half a brain could figure to
> go look there, I didn't mention it because
> I didn't want to give Arny the clue he needed.

That's because you have some class, unlike certain "sophomoric" people
here.

Boon

Clyde Slick

December 7th 08, 10:35 PM

On 7 Dec, 15:47, George M. Middius > wrote:
> Clyde Slick said:
>
> > > Sophomoric is probably just comparing you to the only other women he
> > > comes in contact with (teenage Korean girls in massage parlors).
> > I've seen Jenn's picture there a while ago, after she first
> > mentioned her position at Cresta.
>
> Styncho has posted his own picture for comparison:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6zewwc

it's done, stick a fork in it.

Clyde Slick

December 7th 08, 10:37 PM

On 7 Dec, 16:20, "TT" > wrote:
> "George M. Middius" > wrote in messagenews:chdoj4lqvchjesarnskd23rb7ae431bllr@4ax .com...
>
> > Clyde Slick said:
>
> >> > Sophomoric is probably just comparing you to the only other women he
> >> > comes in contact with (teenage Korean girls in massage parlors).
>
> >> I've seen Jenn's picture there a while ago, after she first
> >> mentioned her position at Cresta.
>
> > Styncho has posted his own picture for comparison:
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/6zewwc
>
> And a pic of Arny listening to live music (?) *http://tinyurl.com/2pr8u
>
> Either that or Arny is looking for a clue ;-)
>

No wonder he hasn't been able to post today.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 8th 08, 12:09 AM

On Dec 7, 2:54*am, "Sophistic" > wrote:

> But, apparently, the MidYut's already 'been there, done that. LoT"s.'http://slogoings.blogspot.com/2007/09/summers-last-musical-breath.html

That isn't George's writing style at all. It's more similar to yours.

And it's further evidence why staying anonymous here makes sense.
There are sickos like you and GOIA running around.

George M. Middius[_4_]

December 8th 08, 01:45 AM

Shhhh! said:

> > But, apparently, [George the Great has] already 'been there, done that. LoT"s.'
> http://slogoings.blogspot.com/2007/09/summers-last-musical-breath.html

> That isn't George's writing style at all. It's more similar to yours.

That's exactly what I thought. StynchBlob has been posting under my name.
How tedious.

> And it's further evidence why staying anonymous here makes sense.
> There are sickos like you and GOIA running around.

Stynchie will pray for your heathen soul. (But not until he's finished
choking the chicken.)

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 03:12 AM

Pudge the Gimp minced:

> Sheesh! etc. said:

>> > But, apparently, [George the [[Greek-ed]] has] already 'been there, done
>> > that. LoT"s.'
>> http://slogoings.blogspot.com/2007/09/summers-last-musical-breath.html

>> That isn't George's writing style at all. It's more similar to yours.

> That's exactly what I thought. StynchBlob has been posting under my name.
> How tedious.

Wasn't me, moron, but if it'll put a glimmer in that otherwise dreary,
hovel-bound, shut-in so-called life you morosely lead, then by all means go
ahead and believe it as so.

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 03:16 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> That's because you have some class, unlike certain "sophomoric" people here.

Art has as much class as a sackmanure and probably smells even worse.

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 03:19 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> Perhaps he could start investigating that Atkinson fellow who posts here...I
> think he works for Stereophile.

You ever tried peddling those purported audio component reviews you've
alledgedly penned to Stereophile or any other major audio magazines? No takers,
eh, looser? What a maroon.

Boon

December 8th 08, 04:14 AM

On Dec 7, 7:19ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > Perhaps he could start investigating that Atkinson fellow who posts here...I
> > think he works for Stereophile.
>
> You ever tried peddling those purported audio component reviews you've
> alledgedly penned to Stereophile or any other major audio magazines?

I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
150,000 subscribers all over the globe.

No takers,
> eh, looser? What a maroon.

Your ignorance is startling.

Boon

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 04:31 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> I'm an ...

So much for the killfile, eh liar?

BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAA!!!

Boon

December 8th 08, 04:40 AM

On Dec 7, 8:31ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > I'm an ...
>
> So much for the killfile, eh liar?
>
> BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAA!!!

Actually, someone just emailed me your post, knowing I couldn't resist
making you look like a total idiot. But from your last meltdown here,
I could have guessed that the "killfile" argument was the only defense
you could probably think of. So I took you out.

So, do you want to explain why you think I need to peddle articles to
the competition?

Boon

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 05:00 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

>> > I'm an ...

> > So much for the killfile, eh liar?

> > BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAA!!!

> Actually, someone just emailed me your post, knowing

Sure, nice face-saving horse puckey that sounds real credible.

> I couldn't resist making you look like a total idiot.

The only compulsion irresistible is your need to bloviate at the expense of what
little credibility you have left.

> But from your last meltdown here,

You're deluded.

> I could have guessed that the "killfile" argument was the only defense
> you could probably think of. So I took you out.

More horse puckey.

> So, do you want to explain why you think I need to peddle articles to the
> competition?

Ferstler published vanity books; while the pompous gasbag publishes vanity
netzines. But at least Ferstler was published in national audio magazines, which
makes you even less than Ferstlerian. Live with it, Buffoon.

Clyde Slick

December 8th 08, 05:04 AM

On 7 Dec, 22:16, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > That's because you have some class, unlike certain "sophomoric" people here.
>
> Art has as much class as a sackmanure and probably smells even worse.

"At least" they don't call me "Stynkie"

Boon

December 8th 08, 05:09 AM

On Dec 7, 9:00ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> ï¿½The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> >> > I'm an ...
> > > So much for the killfile, eh liar?
> > > BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAA!!!
> > Actually, someone just emailed me your post, knowing
>
> Sure, nice face-saving horse puckey that sounds real credible.

Occam's Razor...if it sounds credible, it probably is. Your argument
seems to suggest that i have no friends here, yet you have accused me
of the opposite in the past. So you lose.

>
> > I couldn't resist making you look like a total idiot.
>
> The only compulsion irresistible is your need to bloviate at the expense of what
> little credibility you have left.

Hmmm...I think we have another person with a personality disorder,
just like Arny. You're the one who keeps getting pummeled and
retreating to lick your wounds. You keep coming back thinking the
outcome will be different. You fail to understand that you're just
not smart enough to be here. So keep talking about "credibility." I
don't see anyone taking your side.

>
> > But from your last meltdown here,
>
> You're deluded.

Whatever, Arny. Opps...I meant Sophomoric.

>
> > I could have guessed that the "killfile" argument was the only defense
> > you could probably think of. ï¿½So I took you out.
>
> More horse puckey.

No, it makes perfect sense. What doesn't make sense is that you think
me coming out of my killfile to address an ignorant statement of yours
is somehow less acceptable than your ignorant statement. I don't
believe that. You don't believe that. No one else here believes
that. So are you playing to the same imaginary audience as Arny is?

>
> > So, do you want to explain why you think I need to peddle articles to the
> > competition?
>
> Ferstler published vanity books; while the pompous gasbag publishes vanity
> netzines. But at least Ferstler was published in national audio magazines, which
> makes you even less than Ferstlerian. Live with it, Buffoon.

I work for a real live magazine that gives me real live paychecks. I
was hired by the publisher 3 years ago as a columnist and writer.
I've been one of the editors for over a year. It's easy enough to
verify all of this. Since you can't, you'll need to sit over in the
corner with Arny and Bob Morein, the other two imbeciles here who
can't comprehend life without URLs and have no idea who I work for.
Most of the others here have read the magazine, so think about that
before you try to doubt my claims.

Boon

Boon

December 8th 08, 05:24 AM

On Dec 7, 9:04ï¿½pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 7 Dec, 22:16, "Sophistic" > wrote:
>
> > The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > > That's because you have some class, unlike certain "sophomoric" people here.
>
> > Art has as much class as a sackmanure and probably smells even worse.
>
> "At least" they don't call me "Stynkie"

I'm calling him Mangina now.

Boon

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 05:44 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> > >> > I'm an ...

> > > > So much for the killfile, eh liar?

> > > > BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAA!!!

> > > Actually, someone just emailed me your post, knowing

> > Sure, nice face-saving horse puckey that sounds real credible.

> Occam's Razor...if it sounds credible, it probably is. Your argument
> seems to suggest that i have no friends here, yet you have accused me
> of the opposite in the past. So you lose.

If you'd stuck with Occam's Razor instead of taking a detour and winding up
face-first in a ditch, you'd realize the gist of my statement was that most
regulars who've claimed to have killfiled someone else haven't actually done so,
so that they could still read what that person was writing about but not respond
directly, bur rather vicariously, to maintain the fiction that they had indeed
killfiled them.

> > > I couldn't resist making you look like a total idiot.

> > The only compulsion irresistible is your need to bloviate at the expense of
> > what
> > little credibility you have left.

> Hmmm...I think we have another person with a personality disorder,
> just like Arny. You're the one who keeps getting pummeled and
> retreating to lick your wounds. You keep coming back thinking the
> outcome will be different. You fail to understand that you're just
> not smart enough to be here. So keep talking about "credibility." I
> don't see anyone taking your side.

Harp on it as much as you like but your killfile lie has been exposed.

> > > But from your last meltdown here,

> > You're deluded.

> Whatever, Arny. Opps...I meant Sophomoric.

"Opps" Buffoon?

> > > I could have guessed that the "killfile" argument was the only defense
> > > you could probably think of. ?So I took you out.

> > More horse puckey.

> No, it makes perfect sense. What doesn't make sense is that you think
> me coming out of my killfile to address an ignorant statement of yours
> is somehow less acceptable than your ignorant statement. I don't
> believe that. You don't believe that. No one else here believes
> that. So are you playing to the same imaginary audience as Arny is?

Harp on it as much as you like but your killfile lie has been exposed.

> > > So, do you want to explain why you think I need to peddle articles to the
> > > competition?

> > Ferstler published vanity books; while the pompous gasbag publishes vanity
> > netzines. But at least Ferstler was published in national audio magazines,
> > which
> > makes you even less than Ferstlerian. Live with it, Buffoon.

> I work for a real live magazine that gives me real live paychecks. I
> was hired by the publisher 3 years ago as a columnist and writer.
> I've been one of the editors for over a year. It's easy enough to
> verify all of this. Since you can't, you'll need to sit over in the
> corner with Arny and Bob Morein, the other two imbeciles here who
> can't comprehend life without URLs and have no idea who I work for.
> Most of the others here have read the magazine, so think about that
> before you try to doubt my claims.

"AudioEnz New Zealand's hi-fi magazine"? http://audioenz.co.nz/
Might as well be Timbuktu.

At least Ferstler was published in the U.S. You're still in the bush leagues
compared to him.

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 05:47 AM

Clyde Slick wrote:

>> The pompous gasbag bloviated:

>> > That's because you have some class, unlike certain "sophomoric" people
>> > here.

>> Art has as much class as a sackmanure and probably smells even worse.

> "At least" they don't call me "Stynkie"

"At least" you're slicker than shine-ola.

Boon

December 8th 08, 05:55 AM

On Dec 7, 9:44ï¿½pm, "Mangina" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > > >> > I'm an ...
> > > > > So much for the killfile, eh liar?
> > > > > BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAA!!!
> > > > Actually, someone just emailed me your post, knowing
> > > Sure, nice face-saving horse puckey that sounds real credible.
> > Occam's Razor...if it sounds credible, it probably is. ï¿½Your argument
> > seems to suggest that i have no friends here, yet you have accused me
> > of the opposite in the past. ï¿½So you lose.
>
> If you'd stuck with Occam's Razor instead of taking a detour and winding up
> face-first in a ditch, you'd realize the gist of my statement was that most
> regulars who've claimed to have killfiled someone else haven't actually done so,
> so that they could still read what that person was writing about but not respond
> directly, bur rather vicariously, to maintain the fiction that they had indeed
> killfiled them.

But I killfiled you, Mangina. I found it painful to watch you
screaming and twisting like a dog that was hit by a car, so I changed
the channel. The only reason why you're making this an issue because
you're trying to salvage your blunder. It's not working.

>
> > > > I couldn't resist making you look like a total idiot.
> > > The only compulsion irresistible is your need to bloviate at the expense of
> > > what
> > > little credibility you have left.
> > Hmmm...I think we have another person with a personality disorder,
> > just like Arny. ï¿½You're the one who keeps getting pummeled and
> > retreating to lick your wounds. ï¿½You keep coming back thinking the
> > outcome will be different. ï¿½You fail to understand that you're just
> > not smart enough to be here. ï¿½So keep talking about "credibility." ï¿½I
> > don't see anyone taking your side.
>
> Harp on it as much as you like but your killfile lie has been exposed.

No, it hasn't. But your giant mistake has.

>
> > > > But from your last meltdown here,
> > > You're deluded.
> > Whatever, Arny. ï¿½Opps...I meant Sophomoric.
>
> "Opps" Buffoon?

Yes, I made a typo. You must be right about everything now! LOL!

>
> > > > I could have guessed that the "killfile" argument was the only defense
> > > > you could probably think of. ?So I took you out.
> > > More horse puckey.
> > No, it makes perfect sense. ï¿½What doesn't make sense is that you think
> > me coming out of my killfile to address an ignorant statement of yours
> > is somehow less acceptable than your ignorant statement. ï¿½I don't
> > believe that. ï¿½You don't believe that. ï¿½No one else here believes
> > that. ï¿½So are you playing to the same imaginary audience as Arny is?
>
> Harp on it as much as you like but your killfile lie has been exposed.

No, it hasn't. If you were right, I would admit it. It's just too
much fun watching you try to figure where you ****ed up. Let's face
it...the whole killfile thing is a crappy, transparent ruse that isn't
working.

>
> > > > So, do you want to explain why you think I need to peddle articles to the
> > > > competition?
> > > Ferstler published vanity books; while the pompous gasbag publishes vanity
> > > netzines. But at least Ferstler was published in national audio magazines,
> > > which
> > > makes you even less than Ferstlerian. Live with it, Buffoon.
> > I work for a real live magazine that gives me real live paychecks. ï¿½I
> > was hired by the publisher 3 years ago as a columnist and writer.
> > I've been one of the editors for over a year. ï¿½It's easy enough to
> > verify all of this. ï¿½Since you can't, you'll need to sit over in the
> > corner with Arny and Bob Morein, the other two imbeciles here who
> > can't comprehend life without URLs and have no idea who I work for.
> > Most of the others here have read the magazine, so think about that
> > before you try to doubt my claims.
>
> "AudioEnz New Zealand's hi-fi magazine"?http://audioenz.co.nz/
> Might as well be Timbuktu.

Nope...that's not it. LOL! But thanks for noticing that my stuff
appears in several places all over the world.

>
> At least Ferstler was published in the U.S. You're still in the bush leagues
> compared to him.

You have no idea how dumb you look right now. Thanks for making my
night. I couldn't have paid someone to be this dumb.

Boon

Boon

December 8th 08, 05:56 AM

On Dec 7, 9:47ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Clyde Slick wrote:
> >> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
> >> > That's because you have some class, unlike certain "sophomoric" people
> >> > here.
> >> Art has as much class as a sackmanure and probably smells even worse.
> > "At least" they don't call me "Stynkie"
>
> "At least" you're slicker than shine-ola.

"At least" the whole group (except for Arny and Bob) is laughing at
you right now.

Thanks, buddy. Seriously.

Boon

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 06:19 AM

Boon fessed up:

> Let's face it...the whole killfile thing is a crappy, transparent ruse that
> isn't working.

Thanks for the admission your killfile ruse was a lie from the get-go.

Boon

December 8th 08, 06:25 AM

On Dec 7, 10:19ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boon fessed up:
>
> > Let's face it...the whole killfile thing is a crappy, transparent ruse that
> > isn't working.
>
> Thanks for the admission your killfile ruse was a lie from the get-go.

No, it means it's a strawman argument on your part. And now you've
just doubled it. And you're still hiding behind it because you know
you said something stupid in front of a bunch of people, and you're
afraid to admit it.

So, why don't you have the balls to admit you're wrong? Why are you
postponing the inevitable? See, if I made an erroneous error about
you and was proven wrong, I'd say, "Mangina, buddy, you're right."
You know why? Because I'm an adult and I'm accountable for what I
say. I don't suffer from personality disorders that prevent me from
admitting mistakes, or thinking that I'm better than anyone.

So...the next question is, how ****ed up is your life? Something has
to explain why you're so bitter and sullen about the success of
others.

Boon

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 06:57 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> > Thanks for the admission your killfile ruse was a lie from the get-go.

> No, it means ...

You're writing on auto-pilot from things you've probably said to Arny in the
past.

Bereft of any fresh ideas, intellectually bankrupt, have turned you into a
parody of the MidYut.

UnsteadyKen[_3_]

December 8th 08, 08:27 AM

Sophistic wrote...

> At least Ferstler was published in the U.S. You're still in the bush leagues
> compared to him.

Sir, in my capacity as unofficial spokesthing for the unfortunate
savages who inhabit the Rest Of The World may I object to this
slur on our fine countries. Thank you.

--
Ken
http://www.members.lycos.co.uk/buddyduck/

Sophistic

December 8th 08, 08:40 AM

UnsteadyKen objected:

>> At least Ferstler was published in the U.S. You're still in the bush leagues
>> compared to him.

> Sir, in my capacity as unofficial spokesthing for the unfortunate
> savages who inhabit the Rest Of The World may I object to this
> slur on our fine countries. Thank you.

Count your blessings. We're the ones stuck with Ferstler.

Clyde Slick

December 8th 08, 01:57 PM

On 8 Dec, 00:55, Boon > wrote:

> You have no idea how dumb you look right now. *Thanks for making my
> night. *I couldn't have paid someone to be this dumb.
>
> Boon-

I remember when you hired Clerkie and had to fire him
after a week.

Boon

December 8th 08, 02:31 PM

On Dec 7, 10:57ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > > Thanks for the admission your killfile ruse was a lie from the get-go..
> > No, it means ...
>
> You're writing on auto-pilot from things you've probably said to Arny in the
> past.

That's because you sound just like Arny. You're in a place where no
one likes you, yet you keep coming around for more abuse.

>
> Bereft of any fresh ideas, intellectually bankrupt, have turned you into a
> parody of the MidYut.

No, not really. After saying "Thanks for admitting...", you've
certainly become a parody of Arny, haven't you.

Boon

Boon

December 8th 08, 02:46 PM

On Dec 8, 12:27ï¿½am, UnsteadyKen > wrote:
> Sophistic ï¿½wrote...
> > At least Ferstler was published in the U.S. You're still in the bush leagues
> > compared to him.
>
> Sir, in my capacity as unofficial spokesthing for the unfortunate
> savages who inhabit the Rest Of The World may I object to this
> slur on our fine countries. Thank you.

AudioEnz is a fine publication and has been in existence for over 20
years. It was originally a print magazine, but the publisher went to
an online version a few years ago (which is becoming a trend in the
publishing world). As it stands, it is the most widely read audio
magazine in New Zealand.

Perfect Sound Forever is another outlet for my writings. They are the
oldest online music website that is still running. I've written nearly
70 columns for them over the last 11 years. I feel grateful to them
since Jason Gross was the first person to publish my stuff online.
Because of that, I do the column for free.

Neither of these venues are the publication that pays my bills (or
most of them...I have 4 other writing gigs as well). But it's
probably better if Mangina doesn't figure it out. We all saw the
hatchet job he tried to impose on Jenn. What a loser.

Boon

Boon

December 8th 08, 02:50 PM

On Dec 8, 12:40ï¿½am, "Mangina" > wrote:
> UnsteadyKen objected:
>
> >> At least Ferstler was published in the U.S. You're still in the bush leagues
> >> compared to him.
> > Sir, in my capacity as unofficial spokesthing for the unfortunate
> > savages who inhabit the Rest Of The World may I object to this
> > slur on our fine countries. Thank you.
>
> Count your blessings. We're the ones stuck with Ferstler.

No one is stuck with Ferstler these days, Mangina. He never became a
wrecking ball, he never made a mark in the audio world. His reviews
have been read by a couple of thousand people at best. As a result,
he's no longer reviewing and has faded into obscurity. I've spoken
with a number of people in the world, including magazine publishers,
and no one has heard of him. I always have to describe him to people.

Boon

Boon

December 8th 08, 02:55 PM

On Dec 8, 5:57ï¿½am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 8 Dec, 00:55, Boon > wrote:
>
> > You have no idea how dumb you look right now. ï¿½Thanks for making my
> > night. ï¿½I couldn't have paid someone to be this dumb.
>
> > Boon-
>
> I remember when you hired Clerkie and had to fire him
> after a week.

LoL. I feel a little bad about what happened to Howard, but that's
what happens when you miss the point entirely. He thought that the
"tweako freakos" were ruining the hobby, when it was actually people
like him doing all of the damage. The people who ignore the
measurements and specs and just listen to the music are the ones
having fun, which is what you're supposed to do when you have a
hobby. People like Howard and Arny suck the fun out it, and that's
why no one knows who they are.

Boon

Jenn[_3_]

December 8th 08, 03:22 PM

In article
>,
Clyde Slick > wrote:

> On 7 Dec, 13:07, Boon > wrote:
> > On Dec 7, 8:38 am, Jenn > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > In article >,
> >
> > > "Sophistic" > wrote:
> > > > Jenn gushed:
> >
> > > > > My buddy and colleague Inga Swearingen ...
> >
> > > > Inga's press kit page mentions Cuesta College
> > > >http://www.ingaswearingen.com/presskit.php
> >
> > > > And Googlehttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Cuesta+College.jenn
> > > > coughs up this top link
> > > >http://academic.cuesta.edu/performingarts/bios/jennifer_martin.html
> >
> > > > So, now we have a pretty face and sparkling bio to go with the name. ;-)
> >
> > > Hardly a "pretty face", but thanks for the comment on the bio! I need
> > > to have them update it to reflect my new duties there,
> >
> > It's the face of an intelligent woman who is artistic as well.
> > Sophomoric is probably just comparing you to the only other women he
> > comes in contact with (teenage Korean girls in massage parlors). *At
> > any rate, he's "outed" you, even though most of us already knew who
> > you are. *Perhaps he could start investigating that Atkinson fellow
> > who posts here...I think he works for Stereophile.
> >
> > Boon-
>
> I've seen Jenn's picture there a while ago, after she first
> mentioned her position at Cresta.
> Since any body with half a brain could figure to
> go look there, I didn't mention it because
> I didn't want to give Arny the clue he needed.

I don't mind anyone seeing that or knowing where I work. I might have
even posted a link to there at some point.

Clyde Slick

December 8th 08, 10:30 PM

On 8 Dec, 09:31, Boon > wrote:

> No, not really. *After saying "Thanks for admitting...", you've
> certainly become a parody of Arny, haven't you.
>

He copies "the best of Arny"
what a maroon!

Clyde Slick

December 8th 08, 10:33 PM

On 8 Dec, 09:50, Boon > wrote:
..
>
> > Ferstler.
>
> *I've spoken
> with a number of people in the world, including magazine publishers,
> and no one has heard of him. *I always have to describe him to people.
>
> Boon

Somebody needs to write "The Encyclopedia
of Professional Audio Clowns"

Boon

December 8th 08, 11:42 PM

On Dec 8, 2:30ï¿½pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 8 Dec, 09:31, Boon > wrote:
>
> > No, not really. ï¿½After saying "Thanks for admitting...", you've
> > certainly become a parody of Arny, haven't you.
>
> He copies "the best of Arny"
> what a maroon!

I can't believe anyone would see the beating Arny takes here and then
think it's a good approach. The masochism factor is pretty obvious.

Boon

George M. Middius[_4_]

December 8th 08, 11:43 PM

Boon said:

> > > No, not really. After saying "Thanks for admitting...", you've
> > > certainly become a parody of Arny, haven't you.
> >
> > He copies "the best of Arny"
> > what a maroon!
>
> I can't believe anyone would see the beating Arny takes here and then
> think it's a good approach. The masochism factor is pretty obvious.

There's something otherworldly about a Kroopologist.

Sophistic

December 9th 08, 02:49 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> > You're writing on auto-pilot from things you've probably said to Arny in the
> > past.

> That's because you sound just like Arny. You're in a place where no one likes
> you, yet you keep coming around for more abuse.

Hurling one "debating trade" trick after another after another after another
hoping something proves effective.

> > Bereft of any fresh ideas, intellectually bankrupt, have turned you into a
> > parody of the MidYut.

> No, not really. After saying "Thanks for admitting...", you've certainly
> become a parody of Arny, haven't you.

Well, well, a blatant IKYABWAI (which you'll likely deny to the bitter end)
posing as a question within a declarative statement is just richly hilarious!

But, within the past week, what do we have? Only this:
"Thanks Arny for admitting that your word means nothing!"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/87e153092c189016

And this:
"But thanks Arny for admitting that you believe everything you read on the
Internet."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/977189ac812fff76

'What's that stench of hypocrisy reeking me right out of the room?' thought a
befuddled Boon, before realizing the obvious.

Sophistic

December 9th 08, 02:51 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> > Count your blessings. We're the ones stuck with Ferstler.

> No one is stuck with Ferstler these days, Mangina.

Cute, were it original, but you've probably nicked it off the 'net ... something
else you may have in common with Clerkie.

Boon

December 9th 08, 05:10 AM

On Dec 8, 6:49ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > > You're writing on auto-pilot from things you've probably said to Arny in the
> > > past.
> > That's because you sound just like Arny. ï¿½You're in a place where no one likes
> > you, yet you keep coming around for more abuse.
>
> Hurling one "debating trade" trick after another after another after another
> hoping something proves effective.

This isn't an IKYABWAI, but are you referring to yourself here?
Because that's the logical progression of your comment.

>
> > > Bereft of any fresh ideas, intellectually bankrupt, have turned you into a
> > > parody of the MidYut.
> > No, not really. ï¿½After saying "Thanks for admitting...", you've certainly
> > become a parody of Arny, haven't you.
>
> Well, well, a blatant IKYABWAI (which you'll likely deny to the bitter end)
> posing as a question within a declarative statement is just richly hilarious!

Um, no. You made a blanket statement with no support, and I provided
an exact reference that you were writing just like Arny. You lose.

>
> But, within the past week, what do we have? Only this:
> "Thanks Arny for admitting that your word means nothing!"
> ï¿½http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/87e153092c189016
>
> And this:
> "But thanks Arny for admitting that you believe everything you read on the
> Internet."http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/msg/977189ac812fff76

So you don't get irony? I'm not surprised.

>
> 'What's that stench of hypocrisy reeking me right out of the room?' thought a
> befuddled Boon, before realizing the obvious.

You can't be this stupid.

Boon

Boon

December 9th 08, 05:15 AM

On Dec 8, 6:51ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > > Count your blessings. We're the ones stuck with Ferstler.
> > No one is stuck with Ferstler these days, Mangina.
>
> Cute, were it original, but you've probably nicked it off the 'net ... something
> else you may have in common with Clerkie.

Nicked what off the net? What the **** are you talking about? Is it
just more strawmen? I can't tell. I've never seen anyone--not even
Arny--twist so violently away from the truth.

Look, Mangina...you're really not smart enough for this. You come
around, make juvenile comments, get your ass handed to you, and then
you scream and cry for weeks about how we're the mean ones and we're
all hypocrites. No one is buying it. If you don't believe me, we'll
give you the same test as Arny. Show your posts to your closest
friends and family, if you have any, and ask them if you're winning
debates or showing us who's boss. I can do it and get big laughs.
You can't.

You're...not...smart...enough...for...this. Being noisy is not the
same as being witty.

Boon

George M. Middius[_4_]

December 9th 08, 07:59 AM

Boon said to StynchBlob:

> You can't be this stupid.

Don't sell a Kroopologist short. The other day, pajamaborg misused "mewl".
When I called him on it, he posted a dictionary citation that he actually
believed supported his usage, and then he claimed 'victory'.

Kroopologists live in their own little world.

George M. Middius[_4_]

December 9th 08, 08:01 AM

Boon said:

> You're...not...smart...enough...for...this. Being noisy is not the
> same as being witty.

Styncho reminds me of Walsh's character in "Good Morning Vietnam". All he
did was bitch and whine and scowl and glower, until eventually Robin
Williams threw that "you need a BJ so bad" line at him.

Sophistic

December 9th 08, 12:23 PM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> > Cute, were it original, but you've probably nicked it off the 'net ...
> > something else you may have in common with Clerkie.

> Nicked what off the net? What the ...

Early occurence of the word way back 1998 by some weirdo named Corey Farr:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.music.hardcore/msg/8fb8dcd0e221de5d
whereabouts of Seattle, Washington which may be in proximity to Vancouver,
Washington. An acquaintance of yours, Boonie? Given your fag-slang proclivity
("tea-bagging" from some years past) and your unshakeable alliance with Boy
George kinda makes one wonder about your true nature.

Anyways, what a dorky-looking ****** you've turned into:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewProfile&friendID=98041264.
Sort of like a hardened Phineas Freak
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/206/491267111_09e0f83847.jpg but nowhere near as
funny.

However, you're just seething with bitter, hostile resentment seemingly from
every fiber of your being. What caused that? You were a good-natured dude
several years ago. Could it be due to your marital status as mentioned in your
MySpace page? It must have been an explosive divorce, where the ex-Mrs. took
custody of the rugrats, got a restraining order and ran you clear out of town.
It's as good an explanation as any of the venomous bile you habitually spew on
rao now.

You're certainly not the fat, happy slob of yesteryear looking for the next
great cheeseburger or jovially hoisting a round with fellow audiophiles:
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/ces2002/rao/. With the big chunks both divorce
lawyers, along with the alimony and child custody payments, have taken out of
your previously porcine hide, you're probably panhandling for chump change to
scrape up enough dough for the next burger.

It would be comical were it not so pitiful.

Boon

December 9th 08, 02:46 PM

On Dec 9, 4:23ï¿½am, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > > Cute, were it original, but you've probably nicked it off the 'net ....
> > > something else you may have in common with Clerkie.
> > Nicked what off the net? ï¿½What the ...
>
> Early occurence of the word way back 1998 by some weirdo named Corey Farr:http://groups.google.com/group/alt.music.hardcore/msg/8fb8dcd0e221de5d
> whereabouts of Seattle, Washington which may be in proximity to Vancouver,
> Washington.

Not really. It's on the other side of the state.

An acquaintance of yours, Boonie? Given your fag-slang proclivity
> ("tea-bagging" from some years past)

You think using the term "tea-bagging" makes you gay? Interesting.

and your unshakeable alliance with Boy
> George kinda makes one wonder about your true nature.

I've made that clear. But thanks for revealing your homophobia once
again.

>
> Anyways, what a dorky-looking ****** you've turned into:http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewProfile&frie....
> Sort of like a hardened Phineas Freakhttp://farm1.static.flickr.com/206/491267111_09e0f83847.jpgbut nowhere near as
> funny.

Okay...so in one sentence you're calling me gay, and the next sentence
you're commenting on my personal appearance. Kinda makes one wonder
about your true nature.

>
> However, you're just seething with bitter, hostile resentment seemingly from
> every fiber of your being. What caused that? You were a good-natured dude
> several years ago.

I was? Really? Several years you called me caustic. That doesn't
sound good-natured to me!

Could it be due to your marital status as mentioned in your
> MySpace page? It must have been an explosive divorce, where the ex-Mrs. took
> custody of the rugrats, got a restraining order and ran you clear out of town.

Sorry, but none of that is true.

> It's as good an explanation as any of the venomous bile you habitually spew on
> rao now.

And what's the explanation for your bile? When's the last time you
were with a woman? Or a man?

>
> You're certainly not the fat, happy slob of yesteryear looking for the next
> great cheeseburger or jovially hoisting a round with fellow audiophiles:http://www.enjoythemusic.com/ces2002/rao/. With the big chunks both divorce
> lawyers, along with the alimony and child custody payments, have taken out of
> your previously porcine hide, you're probably panhandling for chump change to
> scrape up enough dough for the next burger.

That's some fantasy. Are you a chubbychaser and now you've been cock-
blocked?

>
> It would be comical were it not so pitiful.

Again, your life must be truly revolting for you to set out and
research lives of perfect strangers on the Internet. But then again
you failed to notice a vital piece of information on my MySpace page
that might have helped you figure out how you messed up so badly the
other day. At any rate, no, I will not date you.

Boon

Sophistic

December 10th 08, 05:10 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> you failed to notice a vital piece of information on my MySpace page

What, that you're a senior monkey at some rinky-dink outfit callled TONEdeaf
Audio? Hardly worth mentioning. There are only two U.S. audio publications that
matter: The Absolute Sound and, to a far lesser degree, Stereophile - everything
else is just background noise. You may fancy yourself a big fish, but it's in a
very, very, very, very small pond.

Changing thread headers is something you rarely - it at all - do. That you chose
to do so now is quite telling. The missive must have caused you a great deal of
pain, agony and/or discomfiture. What was it old trotsky used to say? Oh yeah,
that's right ...... SCORE!!!

Boon

December 10th 08, 06:40 AM

On Dec 9, 9:10ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > you failed to notice a vital piece of information on my MySpace page
>
> What, that you're a senior monkey at some rinky-dink outfit callled TONEdeaf
> Audio? Hardly worth mentioning. There are only two U.S. audio publications that
> matter: The Absolute Sound and, to a far lesser degree, Stereophile - everything
> else is just background noise. You may fancy yourself a big fish, but it's in a
> very, very, very, very small pond.

Like I expected you to say that you really like the magazine. That
would require honesty.

>
> Changing thread headers is something you rarely - it at all - do. That you chose
> to do so now is quite telling. The missive must have caused you a great deal of
> pain, agony and/or discomfiture. What was it old trotsky used to say? Oh yeah,
> that's right ...... SCORE!!!

You must be joking. I change a header so I must be in pain? I'm not
the one exhaustively researching you, am I.

LOL!

Boon

Sophistic

December 10th 08, 06:58 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> > > you failed to notice a vital piece of information on my MySpace page

> > What, that you're a senior monkey at some rinky-dink outfit callled TONEdeaf
> >Audio? Hardly worth mentioning. There are only two U.S. audio publications
> >that
> > matter: The Absolute Sound and, to a far lesser degree, Stereophile -
> > everything
> > else is just background noise. You may fancy yourself a big fish, but it's
> > in a
> > very, very, very, very small pond.

> Like I expected you to say that you really like the magazine. That would
> require honesty.

I've never looked at it ... nor have any intentions of so doing.

> > Changing thread headers is something you rarely - it at all - do. That you
> > chose
> > to do so now is quite telling. The missive must have caused you a great deal
> > of
> > pain, agony and/or discomfiture. What was it old trotsky used to say? Oh
> > yeah,
> > that's right ...... SCORE!!!

> You must be joking. I change a header so I must be in pain?

No, seriously. When was the last time you had done so?

> I'm not the one exhaustively researching you, am I.

Second time recently you've posed a question as a statement. Does the question
mark symbol on your keyboard no longer work?

But to the gist of your supposed question, I guess a few minutes searching on
Google would indeed prove exhaustive for one with your mental capabilities.

> LOL!

You're horning in on "Sheeshhhh!" etc. territory there, Buffoon.

Boon

December 10th 08, 07:06 AM

On Dec 9, 10:58ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > > > you failed to notice a vital piece of information on my MySpace page
> > > What, that you're a senior monkey at some rinky-dink outfit callled TONEdeaf
> > >Audio? Hardly worth mentioning. There are only two U.S. audio publications
> > >that
> > > matter: The Absolute Sound and, to a far lesser degree, Stereophile -
> > > everything
> > > else is just background noise. You may fancy yourself a big fish, but it's
> > > in a
> > > very, very, very, very small pond.
> > Like I expected you to say that you really like the magazine. That would
> > require honesty.
>
> I've never looked at it ... nor have any intentions of so doing.

So you're completely ignorant of the subject. And you haven't noticed
that TAS's music magazine, Playback, has copied everything we've
done. And that we have more subscribers than they do. None of that
concerns you. You just want to hurt mean ol' Boon.

>
> > > Changing thread headers is something you rarely - it at all - do. That you
> > > chose
> > > to do so now is quite telling. The missive must have caused you a great deal
> > > of
> > > pain, agony and/or discomfiture. What was it old trotsky used to say? Oh
> > > yeah,
> > > that's right ...... SCORE!!!
> > You must be joking. ï¿½I change a header so I must be in pain?
>
> No, seriously. When was the last time you had done so?

Well, I used to do it all the time, and then I changed newsreaders so
the subject lines aren't as obvious when you post. George emailed me
last week and reminded me that Arny was doing it a lot. So I started
paying attention to it again. See, it had nothing to do with you, my
little sycophant.

>
> > I'm not the one exhaustively researching you, am I.
>
> Second time recently you've posed a question as a statement. Does the question
> mark symbol on your keyboard no longer work?

That sentence can be phrased either way. When it's declarative, it's
more sarcastic in tone. Trust me, I'm a professional.

>
> But to the gist of your supposed question, I guess a few minutes searching on
> Google would indeed prove exhaustive for one with your mental capabilities.

I do exhaustive research through Google all day long, but I suddenly
forget how when you come along. That's pretty unlikely. You really
need to edit yourself...or let me do it for you. It'll save both of
us time.

>
> > LOL!
>
> You're horning in on "Sheeshhhh!" etc. territory there, Buffoon.

I don't even know what that means, other than that you're finished.

Boon

Sophistic

December 10th 08, 07:26 AM

The pompous gasbag bloviated:

> I don't even know what that means, other than that you're finished.

Not quite, but you can have the last word on this thread.

Boon

December 10th 08, 07:30 AM

On Dec 9, 11:26ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > I don't even know what that means, other than that you're finished.
>
> Not quite, but you can have the last word on this thread.

Why don't you read the magazine then? Ben Fong Torres is our music
editor. Todd Rundgren's wife just started writing for us. Ken
Kessler writes for us. Steve Hoffman did a column during our first
year-and-a-half. We're not "rinky-dink."

Just pretend I'm not there. Let's see if you can be objective.

Boon

Sophistic

December 10th 08, 07:57 AM

Boon wrote:

> Why don't you read the magazine then?

I just might, given the names being dropped.

> Ben Fong Torres is our music editor.

Is he still around? Didn't he, like, write for "Rolling Stone" a half-century or
so ago?

> Todd Rundgren's wife just started writing for us. Ken Kessler writes for us.
> Steve Hoffman did a column during our first year-and-a-half. We're not
> "rinky-dink."

> Just pretend I'm not there. Let's see if you can be objective.

I'll try to look at it tomorrow while at work. I definitely will want to check
out the old Hoffmann writings. I'd bought two copies of the Montrose S/T on
Audio Fidelity - one for current play and one for the future as backup just in
case.

Boon

December 10th 08, 08:06 AM

On Dec 9, 11:57ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boon wrote:
> > Why don't you read the magazine then?
>
> I just might, given the names being dropped.
>
> > Ben Fong Torres is our music editor.
>
> Is he still around? Didn't he, like, write for "Rolling Stone" a half-century or
> so ago?

Since 1969. He's been busy writing best-sellers since he retired. He
joined our mag because he was a big fan.

>
> > Todd Rundgren's wife just started writing for us. ï¿½Ken Kessler writes for us.
> > Steve Hoffman did a column during our first year-and-a-half. ï¿½We're not
> > "rinky-dink."
> > Just pretend I'm not there. ï¿½Let's see if you can be objective.
>
> I'll try to look at it tomorrow while at work. I definitely will want to check
> out the old Hoffmann writings. I'd bought two copies of the Montrose S/T on
> Audio Fidelity - one for current play and one for the future as backup just in
> case.

Yeah, Steve's a buddy of mine. But considering I'm such an asshole
and George has clouded my judgment and i don't hate gays and women as
much as you do, that might be a total lie.

Boon

Clyde Slick

December 10th 08, 02:22 PM

On 10 Dec, 00:10, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> The pompous gasbag bloviated:
>
> > you failed to notice a vital piece of information on my MySpace page
>
> What, that you're a senior monkey at some rinky-dink outfit callled TONEdeaf
> Audio? Hardly worth mentioning. There are only two U.S. audio publications that
> matter: The Absolute Sound and, to a far lesser degree, Stereophile - everything
> else is just background noise. You may fancy yourself a big fish, but it's in a
> very, very, very, very small pond.
>

"At least " he is niot a fish out of water.

Sophistic

December 15th 08, 06:01 AM

Boon wrote:

> I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly 150,000
> subscribers all over the globe.

Proof?

Boon

December 15th 08, 06:04 AM

On Dec 14, 10:01ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boon wrote:
> > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly 150,000
> > subscribers all over the globe.
>
> Proof?

Name and address?

Boon

Sophistic

December 15th 08, 06:14 AM

Boon wrote:

> > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.

> > Proof?

> Name and address?

No proof. No surprise. No other word, then, but "Liar."

Boon

December 15th 08, 06:20 AM

On Dec 14, 10:14ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boon wrote:
> > > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.
> > > Proof?
> > Name and address?
>
> No proof. No surprise. No other word, then, but "Liar."

Weren't you chiding me the other day about using "debating trade"
tactics, hypocrite? It all comes down to this...you're an anonymous
Internet asshole. The information would be yours for the taking, but
you're too afraid to "come out."

That's your problem, not mine. You lose. You're dismissed.

Boon

Sophistic

December 15th 08, 06:26 AM

BaBoon wrote:

> > > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.

> That's your problem, not mine. You lose. You're dismissed.

You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus exposed, you proceed
to throw a temper tantrum.

Boon

December 15th 08, 06:31 AM

On Dec 14, 10:26ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> BaBoon wrote:
> > > > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.
> > That's your problem, not mine. ï¿½You lose. ï¿½You're dismissed.
>
> You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus exposed, you proceed
> to throw a temper tantrum.

It's not a temper tantrum. Just give me your contact information and
I'll be happy to comply. Why do you think this is such an outrageous
request? We send out this information every day. Why are you so
different? Are you not trustworthy?

Boon

Sophistic

December 15th 08, 07:01 AM

BaBoon wrote:

> > > > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.

> > > That's your problem, not mine. ?You lose. ?You're dismissed.

> > You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus exposed, you
> > proceed
> > to throw a temper tantrum.

> It's not a temper tantrum. Just give me your contact information and I'll be
> happy to comply. Why do you think this is such an outrageous
request?

We both know why I wouldn't contact you in such a way. I don't want my real name
known on rao. But you're using this as a face-saving ploy to avoid having to
publicly substantiate a braggodocio public claim you made at risk of
jeopardizing what credibility you might otherwise have.

Jenn[_3_]

December 15th 08, 07:05 AM

In article >,
"Sophistic" > wrote:

> BaBoon wrote:
>
> > > > > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > > > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.
>
> > > > That's your problem, not mine. ?You lose. ?You're dismissed.
>
> > > You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus exposed, you
> > > proceed
> > > to throw a temper tantrum.
>
> > It's not a temper tantrum. Just give me your contact information and I'll
> > be
> > happy to comply. Why do you think this is such an outrageous
> request?
>
> We both know why I wouldn't contact you in such a way. I don't want my real
> name
> known on rao.

Arny will have words with you about that.

Or not.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 15th 08, 07:05 AM

On Dec 15, 12:26*am, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> BaBoon wrote:
> > > > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.
> > That's your problem, not mine. *You lose. *You're dismissed.
>
> You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus exposed, you proceed
> to throw a temper tantrum.

Another alternative, of course, is that Boon offers you proof but not
on your terms.

2pid and Clyde tried the same argument you're using on me. "If you
won't say who you are, then you never served in the Army."

I'd say "Sugar was offered the chance to get his proof (but on terms
other than those he liked). He then chose to start calling people
names."

Boon

December 15th 08, 07:07 AM

On Dec 14, 11:01ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> BaBoon wrote:
> > > > > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > > > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.
> > > > That's your problem, not mine. ?You lose. ?You're dismissed.
> > > You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus exposed, you
> > > proceed
> > > to throw a temper tantrum.
> > It's not a temper tantrum. ï¿½Just give me your contact information and I'll be
> > happy to comply. ï¿½Why do you think this is such an outrageous
>
> request?
>
> We both know why I wouldn't contact you in such a way. I don't want my real name
> known on rao. But you're using this as a face-saving ploy to avoid having to
> publicly substantiate a braggodocio public claim you made at risk of
> jeopardizing what credibility you might otherwise have.

We are a legitimate business dealing with legitimate customers. We
are not going to send marketing information to anonymous people on the
Internet who obviously have an ax to grind. Nowhere did I say I was
going to make you known on RAO. My email address is contained in my
posts.

If you want to be an anonymous Internet asshole attacking people, you
give up certain rights. It makes perfect sense. That's the price you
pay for being a coward.

Boon

Sophistic

December 15th 08, 07:20 AM

Boon wrote:

> Nowhere did I say I was going to make you known on RAO. My email address is
> contained in my
posts.

Append @sbcglobal.net to sophistic if you want to send an e-mail.

Boon

December 15th 08, 08:33 AM

On Dec 14, 11:20ï¿½pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> Boon wrote:
> > Nowhere did I say I was going to make you known on RAO. ï¿½My email address is
> > contained in my
>
> posts.
>
> Append @sbcglobal.net to sophistic if you want to send an e-mail.

That's not what I asked. I need your name and address.

Why? Well, let's look at it this way. So far, you've told a lot of
lies about me, from trying to peddle my old columns to JA to
abandoning my children. You haven't offered one shred of proof of any
of this, and when proven wrong you merely move onto the next
accusation or straw man (another lame discussion of killfiles,
anyone?). I need an act of good faith from you, and that's to reveal
your identity to me.

There will be no more proving anything to you. There is no reason to
do it. You have zero credibility here. You can blather on me about me
lying all day long, but you've been the one telling lies. And until
you can start being accountable for the things that you say, then the
onus is on you for proving me wrong, not for me to prove myself
right. As an anonymous coward, that's all you deserve.

No one else has given you this much attention. It's clear that when I
respond to you, it's probably the best thing that's happened to you
all day. I'm sorry, but I can't waste my time on a douchebag like
you. So email me with your name and address. I need to see if you
can say any of these things to my face before I make any sort of
effort to comply with your silly demands.

Boon

Sophistic

December 15th 08, 10:58 AM

BaBoon howled:

> That's not what I asked. I need your name and address.

That's not going to happen.

> Why? Well, let's look at it this way. So far, you've told a lot of lies
> about me, from trying to peddle my old columns to JA

I had merely asked whether you'd ever been published by TAS or Stereophile, so
your preceding statement is fictitious.

> to abandoning my children.

You may be mistaking with Arny on that; I derisively speculated your ex-wife
stayed in Southern California with custody of any children after the divorce
mentioned on your MySpace page, which did bring up an intriguing point when you
offered to send pictures of them taken by cell phone to Arny complete with their
school IDs: it sounds as though you have custody of them even though the mothers
seem to automatically be granted custody. So, did your ex-wife not want custody
of them or did divorce proceedings rule her to be an unfit mother?

> You haven't offered one shred of proof

You're the one who stills needs to prove your claim of 150,000 readers or
subscribers. Until you can do that, working yourself up into a frenzied lather
won't restore your diminishing credibility.

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 12:07 PM

"Sophistic" > wrote in message

> BaBoon wrote:
>
>>>>> I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio
>>>>> magazine with nearly 150,000 subscribers all over the
>>>>> globe.
>
>> That's your problem, not mine. You lose. You're
>> dismissed.
>
> You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus
> exposed, you proceed to throw a temper tantrum.

That's the Marc persona as we have grown to know and *love* him.

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 12:09 PM

"Sophistic" > wrote in message

> BaBoon wrote:
>
>>>>>> I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio
>>>>>> magazine with nearly 150,000 subscribers all over
>>>>>> the globe.
>
>>>> That's your problem, not mine. ?You lose. ?You're
>>>> dismissed.
>
>>> You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate.
>>> Thus exposed, you proceed
>>> to throw a temper tantrum.
>
>> It's not a temper tantrum. Just give me your contact
>> information and I'll be happy to comply. Why do you
>> think this is such an outrageous
> request?
>
> We both know why I wouldn't contact you in such a way. I
> don't want my real name known on rao.

Yup, you're just another coward with a big mouth who can't back up one iota
of what he says.

In your way Syphlistic, you are a good match for Marc.

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 12:10 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

>
> We are a legitimate business dealing with legitimate
> customers.

An assertion weakened by your presence in said alleged business.

> We are not going to send marketing information to anonymous
> people on the Internet who obviously have an ax to grind.

Why not?

Got something to hide?

You need to provide comparable information to TAS if you are going to assert
that you compete with them.

Clyde Slick

December 15th 08, 01:42 PM

On 15 Dec, 02:01, "Sophistic" > wrote:

> We both know why I wouldn't contact you in such a way. I don't want my real name
> known on rao.

LOL!
then don't expect anyone else to divulge real world data to you,
whoever the **** you are.

Clyde Slick

December 15th 08, 01:45 PM

On 15 Dec, 02:05, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 12:26*am, "Sophistic" > wrote:
>
> > BaBoon wrote:
> > > > > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > > > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.
> > > That's your problem, not mine. *You lose. *You're dismissed.
>
> > You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus exposed, you proceed
> > to throw a temper tantrum.
>
> Another alternative, of course, is that Boon offers you proof but not
> on your terms.
>
> 2pid and Clyde tried the same argument you're using on me. "If you
> won't say who you are, then you never served in the Army."
>

You're just another anonymous moron
I have to deal with.
Your credibility is rather low.
I have no indication that you served
in the army, or, that if you did,
you were an officer.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 15th 08, 01:50 PM

On Dec 15, 6:09*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > BaBoon wrote:
>
> >>>>>> I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio
> >>>>>> magazine with nearly 150,000 subscribers all over
> >>>>>> the globe.
>
> >>>> That's your problem, not mine. ?You lose. ?You're
> >>>> dismissed.
>
> >>> You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate.
> >>> Thus exposed, you proceed
> >>> to throw a temper tantrum.
>
> >> It's not a temper tantrum. *Just give me your contact
> >> information and I'll be happy to comply. *Why do you
> >> think this is such an outrageous
> > request?
>
> > We both know why I wouldn't contact you in such a way. I
> > don't want my real name known on rao.
>
> Yup, you're just another coward with a big mouth who can't back up one iota
> of what he says.

Yu said that you aren't insane. Prove it. LOL!

> In your way Syphlistic, you are a good match for Marc.

I think sugar is your sockpuppet, GOIA. You both make up names that
twist handles or email addresses like "baboon", "arty-farty-guy"
"****R" and "Syphlistic".

Or does sugar just attend your church and get these fine Christian
ideas from your minister? LOL!

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 15th 08, 01:57 PM

On Dec 15, 7:45*am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 15 Dec, 02:05, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 12:26*am, "Sophistic" > wrote:
>
> > > BaBoon wrote:
> > > > > > > I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio magazine with nearly
> > > > > > > 150,000 subscribers all over the globe.
> > > > That's your problem, not mine. *You lose. *You're dismissed.
>
> > > You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus exposed, you proceed
> > > to throw a temper tantrum.
>
> > Another alternative, of course, is that Boon offers you proof but not
> > on your terms.
>
> > 2pid and Clyde tried the same argument you're using on me. "If you
> > won't say who you are, then you never served in the Army."
>
> You're just another anonymous moron
> I have to deal with.
> Your credibility is rather low.

Um, compared to who? You? 2pid?

> I have no indication that you served
> in the army, or, that if you did,
> you were an officer.

As I said... Thank you for proving my point. LOL!

The bigger point is who cares whether you believe me or not? I don't.
I've done what I've done, Clyde. To the left of me is my "I love me"
wall. Ask a vet what that is sometime. Other, smarter people have
based their judgements on whether I've served or not based on what
I've written. You're too blinded to see what that means.

It's really going to **** you and 2pid off when I pick up LTC.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 15th 08, 01:59 PM

On Dec 15, 6:07*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > BaBoon wrote:
>
> >>>>> I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio
> >>>>> magazine with nearly 150,000 subscribers all over the
> >>>>> globe.
>
> >> That's your problem, not mine. *You lose. *You're
> >> dismissed.
>
> > You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate. Thus
> > exposed, you proceed to throw a temper tantrum.
>
> That's the Marc persona as we have grown to know and *love* him.

Yes, GOIA, you are humble and loveable. And that's why *everybody* is
simply in *love* with you!

There must be 100s of GOIA admirers out there. Yet none ever seem to
appear. Isn't that strange? LOL!

Boon

December 15th 08, 02:53 PM

On Dec 15, 2:58ï¿½am, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> BaBoon howled:
>
> > That's not what I asked. ï¿½I need your name and address.
>
> That's not going to happen.
>
> > Why? ï¿½Well, let's look at it this way. ï¿½So far, you've told a lot of lies
> > about me, from trying to peddle my old columns to JA
>
> I had merely asked whether you'd ever been published by TAS or Stereophile, so
> your preceding statement is fictitious.
>
> > to abandoning my children.
>
> You may be mistaking with Arny on that; I derisively speculated your ex-wife
> stayed in Southern California with custody of any children after the divorce
> mentioned on your MySpace page,

Wrong.

which did bring up an intriguing point when you
> offered to send pictures of them taken by cell phone to Arny complete with their
> school IDs: it sounds as though you have custody of them even though the mothers
> seem to automatically be granted custody. So, did your ex-wife not want custody
> of them or did divorce proceedings rule her to be an unfit mother?

None of the above.

>
> > You haven't offered one shred of proof

I've offered plenty of proof.

>
> You're the one who stills needs to prove your claim of 150,000 readers or
> subscribers. Until you can do that, working yourself up into a frenzied lather
> won't restore your diminishing credibility.

Name and address please.

Boon

Boon

December 15th 08, 02:59 PM

On Dec 15, 4:10ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
> > We are a legitimate business dealing with legitimate
> > customers.
>
> An assertion weakened by your presence in said alleged business.
>
> > We ï¿½are not going to send marketing information to anonymous
> > people on the ï¿½Internet who obviously have an ax to grind.
>
> Why not?
>
> Got something to hide?
>
> You need to provide comparable information to TAS if you are going to assert
> that you compete with them.

We have nothing to hide. TAS has the information.

If you follow the proper business protocols, you can have it too.
It's not my place to splash it all over the Internet. I'm not going to
jeopardize my job by responding to a couple of guys who have lied
about my personal life.

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:02 PM

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 6:07 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> BaBoon wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio
>>>>>>> magazine with nearly 150,000 subscribers all over
>>>>>>> the globe.
>>
>>>> That's your problem, not mine. You lose. You're
>>>> dismissed.
>>
>>> You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate.
>>> Thus exposed, you proceed to throw a temper tantrum.
>>
>> That's the Marc persona as we have grown to know and
>> *love* him.
>
> Yes, GOIA, you are humble and loveable. And that's why
> *everybody* is simply in *love* with you!

How many real people live in your little RAO universe ****Y? Five? Eight?

> There must be 100s of GOIA admirers out there.

Could be. After all, unlike you ****R I have a life outside of RAO.

Yet none ever seem to appear.

Actually they have from time to time, but your inabiltiy to admit that
speaks to your habitual lying, ****R.

> Isn't that strange?

What is strange is even 5 people willing to put so much effort into
preserving RAO as a Middiot-dominated intellectual wasteland.

Boon

December 15th 08, 03:05 PM

On Dec 15, 7:02ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> wrote in
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 6:07 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> BaBoon wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio
> >>>>>>> magazine with nearly 150,000 subscribers all over
> >>>>>>> the globe.
>
> >>>> That's your problem, not mine. You lose. You're
> >>>> dismissed.
>
> >>> You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate.
> >>> Thus exposed, you proceed to throw a temper tantrum.
>
> >> That's the Marc persona as we have grown to know and
> >> *love* him.
>
> > Yes, GOIA, you are humble and loveable. And that's why
> > *everybody* is simply in *love* with you!
>
> How many real people live in your little RAO universe ****Y? ï¿½Five? Eight?
>
> > There must be 100s of GOIA admirers out there.
>
> Could be. After all, unlike you ****R I have a life outside of RAO.
>
> Yet none ever seem to appear.
>
> Actually they have from time to time, but your inabiltiy to admit that
> speaks to your habitual lying, ****R.
>
> > Isn't that strange?
>
> What is strange is even 5 people willing to put so much effort into
> preserving RAO as a Middiot-dominated intellectual wasteland.-

We want to preserve an Arny-free RAO, not the current one.

Shhh! understands the business aspect of this situation. You and CISG
do not. Neither of you appear to have any success in the business
world. Coincidence?

Boon

Sophistic

December 15th 08, 03:05 PM

BaBoon does an Arny:

> > > You haven't offered one shred of proof

> I've offered plenty of proof.

You're arguing with yourself there, you know.

BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!

Boon

December 15th 08, 03:06 PM

On Dec 15, 7:05ï¿½am, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> BaBoon does an Arny:
>
> > > > You haven't offered one shred of proof
> > I've offered plenty of proof.
>
> You're arguing with yourself there, you know.
>
> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!

I've made the offer. You've run away from it.

Cry me a river, bitch.

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:09 PM

"Sophistic" > wrote in message

> BaBoon does an Arny:
>
>>>> You haven't offered one shred of proof
>
>> I've offered plenty of proof.
>
> You're arguing with yourself there, you know.
>
> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!

Marc has proven himself to be intellectually unable to know what proof even
is.

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:11 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with legitimate
>>> customers.
>>
>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said alleged
>> business.
>>
>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information to
>>> anonymous people on the ?Internet who obviously have an
>>> ax to grind.
>>
>> Why not?
>>
>> Got something to hide?
>>
>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS if you
>> are going to assert that you compete with them.
>
> We have nothing to hide. TAS has the information.
>
> If you follow the proper business protocols, you can have
> it too.

Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another post you said that there
was no way I could have it.

So which post is true and which post is a lie?

> It's not my place to splash it all over the
> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about my
> personal life.

Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie about people's personal
life, given the hundreds of lies you've told about me?

Oh I get it, you can dish it out but you can't take it.

Sophistic

December 15th 08, 03:13 PM

BaBoon howled:

> > > > > You haven't offered one shred of proof

> > > I've offered plenty of proof.

> > You're arguing with yourself there, you know.

> > BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!

> I've made the offer. You've run away from it.

You've made a public claim that you refuse to publicly substantiate.

No transparently hollow, face-saving deflective ploy is going to alter that.

And you further compound it by calling into question whatever credibility you
may have once had.

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:14 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 7:02?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
>> wrote in
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 6:07 am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> BaBoon wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm an editor and writer for a music and audio
>>>>>>>>> magazine with nearly 150,000 subscribers all over
>>>>>>>>> the globe.
>>
>>>>>> That's your problem, not mine. You lose. You're
>>>>>> dismissed.
>>
>>>>> You made a claim that you're unable to substantiate.
>>>>> Thus exposed, you proceed to throw a temper tantrum.
>>
>>>> That's the Marc persona as we have grown to know and
>>>> *love* him.
>>
>>> Yes, GOIA, you are humble and loveable. And that's why
>>> *everybody* is simply in *love* with you!
>>
>> How many real people live in your little RAO universe
>> ****Y? ?Five? Eight?
>>
>>> There must be 100s of GOIA admirers out there.
>>
>> Could be. After all, unlike you ****R I have a life
>> outside of RAO.
>>
>> Yet none ever seem to appear.
>>
>> Actually they have from time to time, but your inabiltiy
>> to admit that
>> speaks to your habitual lying, ****R.
>>
>>> Isn't that strange?
>>
>> What is strange is even 5 people willing to put so much
>> effort into
>> preserving RAO as a Middiot-dominated intellectual
>> wasteland.-
>
> We want to preserve an Arny-free RAO, not the current one.

Marc, given that I post a lot of inconvenient truths, like the facts about
your lies of this morning, I can see why you want to see me leave.

> Shhh! understands the business aspect of this situation.

****R doesn't exist in the real world, we do. Your mention of him is yet
another deception and distraction.

> You and CISG do not.

Marc, your usual lies and delusional assertions are falling apart before
your very eyes. Again.

> Neither of you appear to have any success in the business
> world.

Post my resume Marc or admit that you really don't know anything about my
success in the business world.

Boon

December 15th 08, 03:16 PM

On Dec 15, 7:11ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> We are a legitimate business dealing with legitimate
> >>> customers.
>
> >> An assertion weakened by your presence in said alleged
> >> business.
>
> >>> We ?are not going to send marketing information to
> >>> anonymous people on the ?Internet who obviously have an
> >>> ax to grind.
>
> >> Why not?
>
> >> Got something to hide?
>
> >> You need to provide comparable information to TAS if you
> >> are going to assert that you compete with them.
>
> > We have nothing to hide. ï¿½TAS has the information.
>
> > If you follow the proper business protocols, you can have
> > it too.
>
> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another post you said that there
> was no way I could have it.
>
> So which post is true and which post is a lie?

Both are true. You are not a viable business entity, and therefore
you cannot follow the proper business protocols.

>
> > It's not my place to splash it all over the
> > Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
> > responding to a couple of guys who have lied about my
> > personal life.
>
> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie about people's personal
> life, given the hundreds of lies you've told about me?

I haven't lied about you. Do you really want to talk about your
pedophilia on Usenet again?

>
> Oh I get it, you can dish it out but you can't take it.

What are you talking about? You've been lying about my family for
years. You make up stuff about me out of thin air, and I use your
observable behavior on this newsgroup. That's the relationship you
and I have cultivated over the last decade.

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:21 PM

"Sophistic" > wrote in message

> BaBoon howled:
>
>>>>>> You haven't offered one shred of proof
>
>>>> I've offered plenty of proof.
>
>>> You're arguing with yourself there, you know.
>
>>> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!
>
>> I've made the offer. You've run away from it.
>
> You've made a public claim that you refuse to publicly
> substantiate.

Right. And, then Marc lies about whether he'll distribute the information
privately.

> No transparently hollow, face-saving deflective ploy is
> going to alter that.

As usual Marc is his worst own enemy.

> And you further compound it by calling into question
> whatever credibility you may have once had.

Marc is trying hard to have even less credibility than the Middiot.

Clyde Slick

December 15th 08, 03:23 PM

On 15 Dec, 10:14, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

>
> Post my resume Marc or admit that you really don't know anything about my
> success in the business world.-

It is nothing but Dust in the Wind.

Boon

December 15th 08, 03:26 PM

On Dec 15, 7:21ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > BaBoon howled:
>
> >>>>>> You haven't offered one shred of proof
>
> >>>> I've offered plenty of proof.
>
> >>> You're arguing with yourself there, you know.
>
> >>> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!
>
> >> I've made the offer. ï¿½You've run away from it.
>
> > You've made a public claim that you refuse to publicly
> > substantiate.
>
> Right. And, then Marc lies about whether he'll distribute the information
> privately.

I didn't lie about whether or not I'll distribute the information
privately. The information gets distributed privately every day.

>
> > No transparently hollow, face-saving deflective ploy is
> > going to alter that.
>
> As usual Marc is his worst own enemy.

Blah blah blah.

>
> > And you further compound it by calling into question
> > whatever credibility you may have once had.
>
> Marc is trying hard to have even less credibility than the Middiot.

I notice you didn't mention yourself. I remember when you said the
kiddy porn had infants in it, yet the MSP said the subjects were most
likely over the age of 18. Is that what you mean by "less credibility
than the Middiot?"

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:27 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with legitimate
>>>>> customers.
>>
>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said alleged
>>>> business.
>>
>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information to
>>>>> anonymous people on the ?Internet who obviously have
>>>>> an ax to grind.
>>
>>>> Why not?
>>
>>>> Got something to hide?
>>
>>>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS if
>>>> you are going to assert that you compete with them.
>>
>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the information.
>>
>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you can
>>> have it too.
>>
>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another post
>> you said that there was no way I could have it.
>>
>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?

> Both are true. You are not a viable business entity, and
> therefore you cannot follow the proper business protocols.

Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a complete list of the
business entities that I have significant influence or leadership in, and
state why each one is not a viable Business entity. Otherwise, you are
exposed yet again as a liar.

>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about my
>>> personal life.

>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie about
>> people's personal life, given the hundreds of lies
>> you've told about me?

> I haven't lied about you.

You do it again:

Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia on Usenet again?

Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid delusions *that* strong?

>> Oh I get it, you can dish it out but you can't take it.

> What are you talking about?

>You've been lying about my family for years.

Prove it, Marc.

> You make up stuff about me out of thin air,

No, Marc you tell on yourself.

>and I use your observable behavior on this newsgroup.

No Marc, you rant and rave about your paranoid delusions. You have zero
proof.

>That's the relationship you and I have cultivated over the last decade.

Te nature of our so-called relationship Marc, is that you habitually lie
about me, and then run the other way when called to stand behind your lies.

Boon

December 15th 08, 03:33 PM

On Dec 15, 7:27ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with legitimate
> >>>>> customers.
>
> >>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said alleged
> >>>> business.
>
> >>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information to
> >>>>> anonymous people on the ?Internet who obviously have
> >>>>> an ax to grind.
>
> >>>> Why not?
>
> >>>> Got something to hide?
>
> >>>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS if
> >>>> you are going to assert that you compete with them.
>
> >>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the information.
>
> >>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you can
> >>> have it too.
>
> >> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another post
> >> you said that there was no way I could have it.
>
> >> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
> > Both are true. ï¿½You are not a viable business entity, and
> > therefore you cannot follow the proper business protocols.
>
> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a complete list of the
> business entities that I have significant influence or leadership in, and
> state why each one is not a viable Business entity. Otherwise, you are
> exposed yet again as a liar.

It's not a delusion but a business decision. I've known you for 10
years. I know that you are not a prospective advertiser.

>
> ï¿½>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>
> >>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
> >>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about my
> >>> personal life.
> >> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie about
> >> people's personal life, given the hundreds of lies
> >> you've told about me?
> > I haven't lied about you.
>
> You do it again:
>
> ï¿½Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia on Usenet again?
>
> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid delusions *that* strong?

Prove that I'm lying.

>
> >> Oh I get it, you can dish it out but you can't take it.
> > What are you talking about?
> >You've been lying about my family for years.
>
> Prove it, Marc.

You said that I abandoned my children. You haven't been able to prove
it.

>
> > You make up stuff about me out of thin air,
>
> No, Marc you tell on yourself.

No, you make up stuff about me out of thin air.

>
> >and I use your observable behavior on this newsgroup.
>
> No Marc, you rant and rave about your paranoid delusions. You have zero
> proof.

Wrong.

>
> >That's the relationship you and I have cultivated over the last decade.
>
> Te nature of our so-called relationship Marc, is that you habitually lie
> about me, and then run the other way when called to stand behind your lies.

Wrong.

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:33 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 7:21?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> BaBoon howled:
>>
>>>>>>>> You haven't offered one shred of proof
>>
>>>>>> I've offered plenty of proof.
>>
>>>>> You're arguing with yourself there, you know.
>>
>>>>> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!
>>
>>>> I've made the offer. ?You've run away from it.
>>
>>> You've made a public claim that you refuse to publicly
>>> substantiate.
>>
>> Right. And, then Marc lies about whether he'll
>> distribute the information privately.
>
> I didn't lie about whether or not I'll distribute the
> information privately. The information gets distributed
> privately every day.
>
>>
>>> No transparently hollow, face-saving deflective ploy is
>>> going to alter that.
>>
>> As usual Marc is his worst own enemy.
>
> Blah blah blah.

IOW, Marc stands practially mute.

>>> And you further compound it by calling into question
>>> whatever credibility you may have once had.
>>
>> Marc is trying hard to have even less credibility than
>> the Middiot.

> I notice you didn't mention yourself.

No need to. Marc, unlike your heroes Middiot and ****R I stand behind what I
post.

> I remember when
> you said the kiddy porn had infants in it, yet the MSP
> said the subjects were most likely over the age of 18.

I reported that information as soon as I knew it. I do occasionally make
mistakes, but I own up to them. You ought to try it some time, Marc.

> Is that what you mean by "less credibility than the Middiot?"

As soon as the Middiot provides his proper name and address, he'll have more
than zero credibility.

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:36 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 7:27?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with legitimate
>>>>>>> customers.
>>
>>>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said
>>>>>> alleged business.
>>
>>>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information to
>>>>>>> anonymous people on the ?Internet who obviously have
>>>>>>> an ax to grind.
>>
>>>>>> Why not?
>>
>>>>>> Got something to hide?
>>
>>>>>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS if
>>>>>> you are going to assert that you compete with them.
>>
>>>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the information.
>>
>>>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you can
>>>>> have it too.
>>
>>>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another post
>>>> you said that there was no way I could have it.
>>
>>>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
>>> Both are true. ?You are not a viable business entity,
>>> and
>>> therefore you cannot follow the proper business
>>> protocols.
>>
>> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a
>> complete list of the business entities that I have
>> significant influence or leadership in, and state why
>> each one is not a viable Business entity. Otherwise, you
>> are exposed yet again as a liar.
>
> It's not a delusion but a business decision. I've known
> you for 10 years. I know that you are not a prospective
> advertiser.
>
>>
>> ?>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>>
>>>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
>>>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about my
>>>>> personal life.
>>>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie about
>>>> people's personal life, given the hundreds of lies
>>>> you've told about me?
>>> I haven't lied about you.
>>
>> You do it again:
>>
>> ?Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia on
>> Usenet again?

>> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid
>> delusions *that* strong?

> Prove that I'm lying.

You just did.

You called me a pedophile and then in another nearly concurrent post
admitted that you know that the MSP said that the "Dead Nate" email did not
contain kiddie porn.

I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done. Your own words condemn
you.

BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)

Boon

December 15th 08, 03:40 PM

On Dec 15, 7:33ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 7:21?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> BaBoon howled:
>
> >>>>>>>> You haven't offered one shred of proof
>
> >>>>>> I've offered plenty of proof.
>
> >>>>> You're arguing with yourself there, you know.
>
> >>>>> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!
>
> >>>> I've made the offer. ?You've run away from it.
>
> >>> You've made a public claim that you refuse to publicly
> >>> substantiate.
>
> >> Right. And, then Marc lies about whether he'll
> >> distribute the information privately.
>
> > I didn't lie about whether or not I'll distribute the
> > information privately. ï¿½The information gets distributed
> > privately every day.

IOW, Arny stands practically mute.

>
> >>> No transparently hollow, face-saving deflective ploy is
> >>> going to alter that.
>
> >> As usual Marc is his worst own enemy.
>
> > Blah blah blah.
>
> IOW, Marc stands practially mute.

Because that's a nonsense statement that you utter all the time. It
doesn't deserve a response.

>
> >>> And you further compound it by calling into question
> >>> whatever credibility you may have once had.
>
> >> Marc is trying hard to have even less credibility than
> >> the Middiot.
> > I notice you didn't mention yourself.
>
> No need to. Marc, unlike your heroes Middiot and ****R I stand behind what I
> post.

Then prove that I abandoned my children and that I'm divorced.

>
> > ï¿½I remember when
> > you said the kiddy porn had infants in it, yet the MSP
> > said the subjects were most likely over the age of 18.
>
> I reported that information as soon as I knew it. I do occasionally make
> mistakes, but I own up to them. You ought to try it some time, Marc.

You're missing the fatal flaw in your argument...again.

>
> > Is that what you mean by "less credibility than the Middiot?"
>
> As soon as the Middiot provides his proper name and address, he'll have more
> than zero credibility.

Waiting for your proof, and CISG's name and address.

Boon

Boon

December 15th 08, 03:42 PM

On Dec 15, 7:36ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 7:27?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with legitimate
> >>>>>>> customers.
>
> >>>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said
> >>>>>> alleged business.
>
> >>>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information to
> >>>>>>> anonymous people on the ?Internet who obviously have
> >>>>>>> an ax to grind.
>
> >>>>>> Why not?
>
> >>>>>> Got something to hide?
>
> >>>>>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS if
> >>>>>> you are going to assert that you compete with them.
>
> >>>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the information.
>
> >>>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you can
> >>>>> have it too.
>
> >>>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another post
> >>>> you said that there was no way I could have it.
>
> >>>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
> >>> Both are true. ?You are not a viable business entity,
> >>> and
> >>> therefore you cannot follow the proper business
> >>> protocols.
>
> >> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a
> >> complete list of the business entities that I have
> >> significant influence or leadership in, and state why
> >> each one is not a viable Business entity. Otherwise, you
> >> are exposed yet again as a liar.
>
> > It's not a delusion but a business decision. ï¿½I've known
> > you for 10 years. ï¿½I know that you are not a prospective
> > advertiser.
>
> >> ?>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>
> >>>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
> >>>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about my
> >>>>> personal life.
> >>>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie about
> >>>> people's personal life, given the hundreds of lies
> >>>> you've told about me?
> >>> I haven't lied about you.
>
> >> You do it again:
>
> >> ?Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia on
> >> Usenet again?
> >> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid
> >> delusions *that* strong?
> > Prove that I'm lying.
>
> You just did.
>
> You called me a pedophile and then in another nearly concurrent post
> admitted that you know that the MSP said that the "Dead Nate" email did not
> contain kiddie porn.

Wrong. I did not say that.

>
> I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done. Your own words condemn
> you.
>
> BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)

So you're running away from me again? That sounds like someone who
just had his ass kicked.

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:46 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 7:33?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 7:21?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> BaBoon howled:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> You haven't offered one shred of proof
>>
>>>>>>>> I've offered plenty of proof.
>>
>>>>>>> You're arguing with yourself there, you know.
>>
>>>>>>> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!
>>
>>>>>> I've made the offer. ?You've run away from it.
>>
>>>>> You've made a public claim that you refuse to publicly
>>>>> substantiate.
>>
>>>> Right. And, then Marc lies about whether he'll
>>>> distribute the information privately.
>>
>>> I didn't lie about whether or not I'll distribute the
>>> information privately. ?The information gets distributed
>>> privately every day.
>
> IOW, Arny stands practically mute.
>
>>
>>>>> No transparently hollow, face-saving deflective ploy
>>>>> is going to alter that.
>>
>>>> As usual Marc is his worst own enemy.
>>
>>> Blah blah blah.
>>
>> IOW, Marc stands practially mute.
>
> Because that's a nonsense statement that you utter all
> the time. It doesn't deserve a response.
>
>>
>>>>> And you further compound it by calling into question
>>>>> whatever credibility you may have once had.
>>
>>>> Marc is trying hard to have even less credibility than
>>>> the Middiot.
>>> I notice you didn't mention yourself.
>>
>> No need to. Marc, unlike your heroes Middiot and ****R I
>> stand behind what I post.

> Then prove that I abandoned my children and that I'm
> divorced.

Asked and answered.

>>> ?I remember when
>>> you said the kiddy porn had infants in it, yet the MSP
>>> said the subjects were most likely over the age of 18.
>>
>> I reported that information as soon as I knew it. I do
>> occasionally make mistakes, but I own up to them. You
>> ought to try it some time, Marc.

> You're missing the fatal flaw in your argument...again.

But Marc you can't say what that flaw is, so this is what, your third lie
for the day?

It still ain't noon on the East coast! :-(

>>> Is that what you mean by "less credibility than the
>>> Middiot?"
>>
>> As soon as the Middiot provides his proper name and
>> address, he'll have more than zero credibility.

> Waiting for your proof, and CISG's name and address.

Sorry Marc, you can't hide between your own posts. Your habitual lies and
deceptions just keep building up.

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 03:48 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 7:36?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 7:27?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger"
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with
>>>>>>>>> legitimate customers.
>>
>>>>>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said
>>>>>>>> alleged business.
>>
>>>>>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information to
>>>>>>>>> anonymous people on the ?Internet who obviously
>>>>>>>>> have an ax to grind.
>>
>>>>>>>> Why not?
>>
>>>>>>>> Got something to hide?
>>
>>>>>>>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS
>>>>>>>> if you are going to assert that you compete with
>>>>>>>> them.
>>
>>>>>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the information.
>>
>>>>>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you can
>>>>>>> have it too.
>>
>>>>>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another
>>>>>> post you said that there was no way I could have it.
>>
>>>>>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
>>>>> Both are true. ?You are not a viable business entity,
>>>>> and
>>>>> therefore you cannot follow the proper business
>>>>> protocols.
>>
>>>> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a
>>>> complete list of the business entities that I have
>>>> significant influence or leadership in, and state why
>>>> each one is not a viable Business entity. Otherwise,
>>>> you are exposed yet again as a liar.
>>
>>> It's not a delusion but a business decision. ?I've known
>>> you for 10 years. ?I know that you are not a prospective
>>> advertiser.
>>
>>>>>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>>
>>>>>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
>>>>>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about
>>>>>>> my personal life.
>>>>>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie
>>>>>> about people's personal life, given the hundreds of
>>>>>> lies you've told about me?
>>>>> I haven't lied about you.
>>
>>>> You do it again:
>>
>>>> ?Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia on
>>>> Usenet again?
>>>> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid
>>>> delusions *that* strong?
>>> Prove that I'm lying.
>>
>> You just did.
>>
>> You called me a pedophile and then in another nearly
>> concurrent post admitted that you know that the MSP said
>> that the "Dead Nate" email did not contain kiddie porn.
>
> Wrong. I did not say that.

Sure you did Marc, but if I show you, you'll lie about that too.

>> I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done. Your
>> own words condemn you.
>>
>> BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)
>
> So you're running away from me again? That sounds like
> someone who just had his ass kicked.

Run and hide?

Marc, I just circled around back and kicked your butt 3 more times. I am
getting tired of kicking your butt, and I do have moral reservations about
kicking you again when you are this far down.

Boon

December 15th 08, 04:19 PM

On Dec 15, 7:46ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 7:33?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 15, 7:21?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> BaBoon howled:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> You haven't offered one shred of proof
>
> >>>>>>>> I've offered plenty of proof.
>
> >>>>>>> You're arguing with yourself there, you know.
>
> >>>>>>> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!
>
> >>>>>> I've made the offer. ?You've run away from it.
>
> >>>>> You've made a public claim that you refuse to publicly
> >>>>> substantiate.
>
> >>>> Right. And, then Marc lies about whether he'll
> >>>> distribute the information privately.
>
> >>> I didn't lie about whether or not I'll distribute the
> >>> information privately. ?The information gets distributed
> >>> privately every day.
>
> > IOW, Arny stands practically mute.
>
> >>>>> No transparently hollow, face-saving deflective ploy
> >>>>> is going to alter that.
>
> >>>> As usual Marc is his worst own enemy.
>
> >>> Blah blah blah.
>
> >> IOW, Marc stands practially mute.
>
> > Because that's a nonsense statement that you utter all
> > the time. ï¿½It doesn't deserve a response.
>
> >>>>> And you further compound it by calling into question
> >>>>> whatever credibility you may have once had.
>
> >>>> Marc is trying hard to have even less credibility than
> >>>> the Middiot.
> >>> I notice you didn't mention yourself.
>
> >> No need to. Marc, unlike your heroes Middiot and ****R I
> >> stand behind what I post.
> > Then prove that I abandoned my children and that I'm
> > divorced.
>
> Asked and answered.

Liar.

>
> >>> ?I remember when
> >>> you said the kiddy porn had infants in it, yet the MSP
> >>> said the subjects were most likely over the age of 18.
>
> >> I reported that information as soon as I knew it. I do
> >> occasionally make mistakes, but I own up to them. You
> >> ought to try it some time, Marc.
> > You're missing the fatal flaw in your argument...again.
>
> But Marc you can't say what that flaw is, so this is what, your third lie
> for the day?

I've said the flaw many times before, and you're too stupid to know
it.

The flaw is this:

You identified the subjects in the photographs as infants.

You said the MSP identified these subject as potentially not minors.

Someone who mistakes an infant for an 18-year-old has no credibility.
>

> It still ain't noon on the East coast! :-(

So?

>
> >>> Is that what you mean by "less credibility than the
> >>> Middiot?"
>
> >> As soon as the Middiot provides his proper name and
> >> address, he'll have more than zero credibility.
> > Waiting for your proof, and CISG's name and address.
>
> Sorry Marc, you can't hide between your own posts. Your habitual lies and
> deceptions just keep building up.-

Hide between my posts? What does that mean?

Boon

Boon

December 15th 08, 04:21 PM

On Dec 15, 7:48ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 7:36?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 15, 7:27?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with
> >>>>>>>>> legitimate customers.
>
> >>>>>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said
> >>>>>>>> alleged business.
>
> >>>>>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information to
> >>>>>>>>> anonymous people on the ?Internet who obviously
> >>>>>>>>> have an ax to grind.
>
> >>>>>>>> Why not?
>
> >>>>>>>> Got something to hide?
>
> >>>>>>>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS
> >>>>>>>> if you are going to assert that you compete with
> >>>>>>>> them.
>
> >>>>>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the information.
>
> >>>>>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you can
> >>>>>>> have it too.
>
> >>>>>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another
> >>>>>> post you said that there was no way I could have it.
>
> >>>>>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
> >>>>> Both are true. ?You are not a viable business entity,
> >>>>> and
> >>>>> therefore you cannot follow the proper business
> >>>>> protocols.
>
> >>>> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a
> >>>> complete list of the business entities that I have
> >>>> significant influence or leadership in, and state why
> >>>> each one is not a viable Business entity. Otherwise,
> >>>> you are exposed yet again as a liar.
>
> >>> It's not a delusion but a business decision. ?I've known
> >>> you for 10 years. ?I know that you are not a prospective
> >>> advertiser.
>
> >>>>>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>
> >>>>>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
> >>>>>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about
> >>>>>>> my personal life.
> >>>>>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie
> >>>>>> about people's personal life, given the hundreds of
> >>>>>> lies you've told about me?
> >>>>> I haven't lied about you.
>
> >>>> You do it again:
>
> >>>> ?Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia on
> >>>> Usenet again?
> >>>> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid
> >>>> delusions *that* strong?
> >>> Prove that I'm lying.
>
> >> You just did.
>
> >> You called me a pedophile and then in another nearly
> >> concurrent post admitted that you know that the MSP said
> >> that the "Dead Nate" email did not contain kiddie porn.
>
> > Wrong. ï¿½I did not say that.
>
> Sure you did Marc, but if I show you, you'll lie about that too.
>
> >> I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done. Your
> >> own words condemn you.
>
> >> BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)
>
> > So you're running away from me again? ï¿½That sounds like
> > someone who just had his ass kicked.
>
> Run and hide?
>
> Marc, I just circled around back and kicked your butt 3 more times. I am
> getting tired of kicking your butt, and I do have moral reservations about
> kicking you again when you are this far down.-

No, you didn't. So far you have yet to prove your libelous claims
about my family. And you're trying to convince us that mistaking a
naked 18-year-old for a naked infant is perfectly reasonable.

So tell me again how you're kicking my ass.

Boon

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 15th 08, 04:44 PM

On Dec 15, 9:36*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done. Your own words condemn
> you.
>
> BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)

I think "have a nice day, and thanks for playing" is Krooglish for "I
think I've won something (other than my usual "I've made an ass of
myself" award)".

Can any Krooglish experts confirm this?

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 15th 08, 04:46 PM

On Dec 15, 9:48*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:

> Sure you did Marc, but if I show you, you'll lie about that too.

Well, will you at least show everybody the secret Christian handshake,
GOIA? So many people (probably 100s) want to be like you. That's your
fault for setting such a fine Christian example. LOL!

George M. Middius[_4_]

December 15th 08, 05:05 PM

Shhhh! said:

> > In your way Syphlistic, you are a good match for Marc.

> I think sugar is your sockpuppet, GOIA. You both make up names that
> twist handles or email addresses like "baboon", "arty-farty-guy"
> "****R" and "Syphlistic".

Is there trouble in Borgadise? Has Mr. **** alienated yet another
Kroopologist?

It's such a chore keeping the Resistance's files up to date since the
Krooborg started going to chruch™ regularly.

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 07:35 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 7:48?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 7:36?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:27?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger"
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger"
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with
>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate customers.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said
>>>>>>>>>> alleged business.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information
>>>>>>>>>>> to anonymous people on the ?Internet who
>>>>>>>>>>> obviously have an ax to grind.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why not?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Got something to hide?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS
>>>>>>>>>> if you are going to assert that you compete with
>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>
>>>>>>>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the information.
>>
>>>>>>>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you
>>>>>>>>> can have it too.
>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another
>>>>>>>> post you said that there was no way I could have
>>>>>>>> it.
>>
>>>>>>>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
>>>>>>> Both are true. ?You are not a viable business
>>>>>>> entity, and
>>>>>>> therefore you cannot follow the proper business
>>>>>>> protocols.
>>
>>>>>> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a
>>>>>> complete list of the business entities that I have
>>>>>> significant influence or leadership in, and state why
>>>>>> each one is not a viable Business entity. Otherwise,
>>>>>> you are exposed yet again as a liar.
>>
>>>>> It's not a delusion but a business decision. ?I've
>>>>> known you for 10 years. ?I know that you are not a
>>>>> prospective advertiser.
>>
>>>>>>>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>>
>>>>>>>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
>>>>>>>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about
>>>>>>>>> my personal life.
>>>>>>>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie
>>>>>>>> about people's personal life, given the hundreds of
>>>>>>>> lies you've told about me?
>>>>>>> I haven't lied about you.
>>
>>>>>> You do it again:
>>
>>>>>> ?Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia on
>>>>>> Usenet again?
>>>>>> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid
>>>>>> delusions *that* strong?
>>>>> Prove that I'm lying.
>>
>>>> You just did.
>>
>>>> You called me a pedophile and then in another nearly
>>>> concurrent post admitted that you know that the MSP
>>>> said that the "Dead Nate" email did not contain kiddie
>>>> porn.
>>
>>> Wrong. ?I did not say that.
>>
>> Sure you did Marc, but if I show you, you'll lie about
>> that too.
>>
>>>> I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done.
>>>> Your own words condemn you.
>>
>>>> BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)
>>
>>> So you're running away from me again? ?That sounds like
>>> someone who just had his ass kicked.
>>
>> Run and hide?
>>
>> Marc, I just circled around back and kicked your butt 3
>> more times. I am getting tired of kicking your butt, and
>> I do have moral reservations about kicking you again
>> when you are this far down.-
>
> No, you didn't.

Marc, I must again take note of your delusions of being able to reading my
mind.

> So far you have yet to prove your
> libelous claims about my family.

I've made no claims about your family, Marc. I have pointed out a number of
troubling situations relating to your sweet self.

So Marc, that would be at least your third lie for the day, still before
noon Eastern time.

> And you're trying to
> convince us that mistaking a naked 18-year-old for a
> naked infant is perfectly reasonable.

The MSP officer thought so.

> So tell me again how you're kicking my ass.

Letsee Marc, there's all of your lying - clearly you are under stress. Then
there's the fact that you've got the Middiot and ****R back, fighting your
battles for you. One is less believable and more mentally incompetent than
the other. If you were a man, you'd tell them to buzz off. I suspect you're
under so much stress that you can't see that.

Boon

December 15th 08, 07:40 PM

On Dec 15, 11:35ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 7:48?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 15, 7:36?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> On Dec 15, 7:27?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with
> >>>>>>>>>>> legitimate customers.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said
> >>>>>>>>>> alleged business.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information
> >>>>>>>>>>> to anonymous people on the ?Internet who
> >>>>>>>>>>> obviously have an ax to grind.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Why not?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Got something to hide?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS
> >>>>>>>>>> if you are going to assert that you compete with
> >>>>>>>>>> them.
>
> >>>>>>>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the information.
>
> >>>>>>>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you
> >>>>>>>>> can have it too.
>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another
> >>>>>>>> post you said that there was no way I could have
> >>>>>>>> it.
>
> >>>>>>>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
> >>>>>>> Both are true. ?You are not a viable business
> >>>>>>> entity, and
> >>>>>>> therefore you cannot follow the proper business
> >>>>>>> protocols.
>
> >>>>>> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a
> >>>>>> complete list of the business entities that I have
> >>>>>> significant influence or leadership in, and state why
> >>>>>> each one is not a viable Business entity. Otherwise,
> >>>>>> you are exposed yet again as a liar.
>
> >>>>> It's not a delusion but a business decision. ?I've
> >>>>> known you for 10 years. ?I know that you are not a
> >>>>> prospective advertiser.
>
> >>>>>>>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>
> >>>>>>>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
> >>>>>>>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about
> >>>>>>>>> my personal life.
> >>>>>>>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie
> >>>>>>>> about people's personal life, given the hundreds of
> >>>>>>>> lies you've told about me?
> >>>>>>> I haven't lied about you.
>
> >>>>>> You do it again:
>
> >>>>>> ?Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia on
> >>>>>> Usenet again?
> >>>>>> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid
> >>>>>> delusions *that* strong?
> >>>>> Prove that I'm lying.
>
> >>>> You just did.
>
> >>>> You called me a pedophile and then in another nearly
> >>>> concurrent post admitted that you know that the MSP
> >>>> said that the "Dead Nate" email did not contain kiddie
> >>>> porn.
>
> >>> Wrong. ?I did not say that.
>
> >> Sure you did Marc, but if I show you, you'll lie about
> >> that too.
>
> >>>> I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done.
> >>>> Your own words condemn you.
>
> >>>> BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)
>
> >>> So you're running away from me again? ?That sounds like
> >>> someone who just had his ass kicked.
>
> >> Run and hide?
>
> >> Marc, I just circled around back and kicked your butt 3
> >> more times. I am getting tired of kicking your butt, and
> >> I do have moral reservations about kicking you again
> >> when you are this far down.-
>
> > No, you didn't.
>
> Marc, I must again take note of your delusions of being able to reading my
> mind.
>
> > ï¿½So far you have yet to prove your
> > libelous claims about my family.
>
> I've made no claims about your family, Marc. I have pointed out a number of
> troubling situations relating to your sweet self.

Such as?

>
> So Marc, that would be at least your third lie for the day, still before
> noon Eastern time.

That would be a lie on your part.

>
> > ï¿½And you're trying to
> > convince us that mistaking a naked 18-year-old for a
> > naked infant is perfectly reasonable.
>
> The MSP officer thought so.

You need an MSP officer to tell you the difference between an infant
and an 18 year old?

>
> > So tell me again how you're kicking my ass.
>
> Letsee Marc, there's all of your lying - clearly you are under stress.

No lies, no stress.

Then
> there's the fact that you've got the Middiot and ****R back, fighting your
> battles for you.

That's because normal people understand the situation. You and CISG
are mired in the debating trade and have hit a dead end.

One is less believable and more mentally incompetent than
> the other.

...says the man with a paranoid and narcissistic personality disorder.

If you were a man, you'd tell them to buzz off.

Why?

I suspect you're
> under so much stress that you can't see that.

Again, what is this stress you keep mentioning?

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 08:20 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 15, 11:35?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 7:48?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:36?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:27?am, "Arny Krueger"
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger"
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger"
>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate customers.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said
>>>>>>>>>>>> alleged business.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> information to anonymous people on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Internet who obviously have an ax to grind.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Got something to hide?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You need to provide comparable information to
>>>>>>>>>>>> TAS if you are going to assert that you
>>>>>>>>>>>> compete with them.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the
>>>>>>>>>>> information.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you
>>>>>>>>>>> can have it too.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In
>>>>>>>>>> another post you said that there was no way I
>>>>>>>>>> could have it.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
>>>>>>>>> Both are true. ?You are not a viable business
>>>>>>>>> entity, and
>>>>>>>>> therefore you cannot follow the proper business
>>>>>>>>> protocols.
>>
>>>>>>>> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a
>>>>>>>> complete list of the business entities that I have
>>>>>>>> significant influence or leadership in, and state
>>>>>>>> why each one is not a viable Business entity.
>>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are exposed yet again as a liar.
>>
>>>>>>> It's not a delusion but a business decision. ?I've
>>>>>>> known you for 10 years. ?I know that you are not a
>>>>>>> prospective advertiser.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
>>>>>>>>>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied
>>>>>>>>>>> about my personal life.
>>>>>>>>>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie
>>>>>>>>>> about people's personal life, given the hundreds
>>>>>>>>>> of lies you've told about me?
>>>>>>>>> I haven't lied about you.
>>
>>>>>>>> You do it again:
>>
>>>>>>>> ?Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia
>>>>>>>> on Usenet again?
>>>>>>>> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid
>>>>>>>> delusions *that* strong?
>>>>>>> Prove that I'm lying.
>>
>>>>>> You just did.
>>
>>>>>> You called me a pedophile and then in another nearly
>>>>>> concurrent post admitted that you know that the MSP
>>>>>> said that the "Dead Nate" email did not contain
>>>>>> kiddie porn.
>>
>>>>> Wrong. ?I did not say that.
>>
>>>> Sure you did Marc, but if I show you, you'll lie about
>>>> that too.
>>
>>>>>> I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done.
>>>>>> Your own words condemn you.
>>
>>>>>> BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)
>>
>>>>> So you're running away from me again? ?That sounds
>>>>> like someone who just had his ass kicked.
>>
>>>> Run and hide?
>>
>>>> Marc, I just circled around back and kicked your butt 3
>>>> more times. I am getting tired of kicking your butt,
>>>> and I do have moral reservations about kicking you
>>>> again when you are this far down.-
>>
>>> No, you didn't.
>>
>> Marc, I must again take note of your delusions of being
>> able to reading my mind.
>>
>>> ?So far you have yet to prove your
>>> libelous claims about my family.
>>
>> I've made no claims about your family, Marc. I have
>> pointed out a number of troubling situations relating to
>> your sweet self.
>
> Such as?

Well Marc, there's your habitual lying.

>> So Marc, that would be at least your third lie for the
>> day, still before noon Eastern time.
>
> That would be a lie on your part.

Prove it.

>>> ?And you're trying to
>>> convince us that mistaking a naked 18-year-old for a
>>> naked infant is perfectly reasonable.
>>
>> The MSP officer thought so.

> You need an MSP officer to tell you the difference
> between an infant and an 18 year old?

Nope, pictures of a small part of their anatomy.

>>
>>> So tell me again how you're kicking my ass.
>>
>> Letsee Marc, there's all of your lying - clearly you are
>> under stress.

> No lies, no stress.

4th lie of the day, but its finally after noon.

> Then
>> there's the fact that you've got the Middiot and ****R
>> back, fighting your battles for you.

> That's because normal people understand the situation.

Yet another clear sign of delusional behavior - thinking that the Middiot
adn ****R are normal.

> You and CISG
> are mired in the debating trade and have hit a dead end.

No Marc, you're still wriggling on the hook.

>> One is less believable and more mentally incompetent than
>> the other.

> ..says the man with a paranoid and narcissistic
> personality disorder.

Yet another clear sign of delusional behavior - thinking that Marc is a
qualified mental health professional.

> If you were a man, you'd tell them to buzz off.

> Why?

Asked and answered.

> I suspect you're
>> under so much stress that you can't see that.

> Again, what is this stress you keep mentioning?

The stress that explains your self-destructive behavior, Marc.

BTW Marc, lets see if you can answer a few simple questions, or if you are
too paranoid and delusional for that.

How many times have you been married?

How many times have you been divorced?

How many children have your genes?
>
> Boon

Boon

December 15th 08, 09:31 PM

On Dec 15, 12:20ï¿½pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 11:35?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 15, 7:48?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> On Dec 15, 7:36?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:27?am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate customers.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said
> >>>>>>>>>>>> alleged business.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> information to anonymous people on the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ?Internet who obviously have an ax to grind.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why not?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Got something to hide?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You need to provide comparable information to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> TAS if you are going to assert that you
> >>>>>>>>>>>> compete with them.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the
> >>>>>>>>>>> information.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you
> >>>>>>>>>>> can have it too.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In
> >>>>>>>>>> another post you said that there was no way I
> >>>>>>>>>> could have it.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
> >>>>>>>>> Both are true. ?You are not a viable business
> >>>>>>>>> entity, and
> >>>>>>>>> therefore you cannot follow the proper business
> >>>>>>>>> protocols.
>
> >>>>>>>> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a
> >>>>>>>> complete list of the business entities that I have
> >>>>>>>> significant influence or leadership in, and state
> >>>>>>>> why each one is not a viable Business entity.
> >>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are exposed yet again as a liar.
>
> >>>>>>> It's not a delusion but a business decision. ?I've
> >>>>>>> known you for 10 years. ?I know that you are not a
> >>>>>>> prospective advertiser.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
> >>>>>>>>>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied
> >>>>>>>>>>> about my personal life.
> >>>>>>>>>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie
> >>>>>>>>>> about people's personal life, given the hundreds
> >>>>>>>>>> of lies you've told about me?
> >>>>>>>>> I haven't lied about you.
>
> >>>>>>>> You do it again:
>
> >>>>>>>> ?Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia
> >>>>>>>> on Usenet again?
> >>>>>>>> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid
> >>>>>>>> delusions *that* strong?
> >>>>>>> Prove that I'm lying.
>
> >>>>>> You just did.
>
> >>>>>> You called me a pedophile and then in another nearly
> >>>>>> concurrent post admitted that you know that the MSP
> >>>>>> said that the "Dead Nate" email did not contain
> >>>>>> kiddie porn.
>
> >>>>> Wrong. ?I did not say that.
>
> >>>> Sure you did Marc, but if I show you, you'll lie about
> >>>> that too.
>
> >>>>>> I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done.
> >>>>>> Your own words condemn you.
>
> >>>>>> BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)
>
> >>>>> So you're running away from me again? ?That sounds
> >>>>> like someone who just had his ass kicked.
>
> >>>> Run and hide?
>
> >>>> Marc, I just circled around back and kicked your butt 3
> >>>> more times. I am getting tired of kicking your butt,
> >>>> and I do have moral reservations about kicking you
> >>>> again when you are this far down.-
>
> >>> No, you didn't.
>
> >> Marc, I must again take note of your delusions of being
> >> able to reading my mind.
>
> >>> ?So far you have yet to prove your
> >>> libelous claims about my family.
>
> >> I've made no claims about your family, Marc. I have
> >> pointed out a number of troubling situations relating to
> >> your sweet self.
>
> > Such as?
>
> Well Marc, there's your habitual lying.

Where's my habitual lying? Or is this just truth by assertion on your
part?

>
> >> So Marc, that would be at least your third lie for the
> >> day, still before noon Eastern time.
>
> > That would be a lie on your part.
>
> Prove it.

When you call somebody a liar and then not prove it, you become a
liar. Remember that?

>
> >>> ?And you're trying to
> >>> convince us that mistaking a naked 18-year-old for a
> >>> naked infant is perfectly reasonable.
>
> >> The MSP officer thought so.
> > You need an MSP officer to tell you the difference
> > between an infant ï¿½and an 18 year old?
>
> Nope, pictures of a small part of their anatomy.

Oh, so now you're changing your story.

>
>
>
> >>> So tell me again how you're kicking my ass.
>
> >> Letsee Marc, there's all of your lying - clearly you are
> >> under stress.
> > No lies, no stress.
>
> 4th lie of the day, but its finally after noon.

So produce evidence of my lies and stress levels.

>
> > Then
> >> there's the fact that you've got the Middiot and ****R
> >> back, fighting your battles for you.
> > That's because normal people understand the situation.
>
> Yet another clear sign of delusional behavior - thinking that the Middiot
> adn ****R are normal.

As a person suffering from personality disorders, you are not
qualified to say what is and isn't normal.

>
> > You and CISG
> > are mired in the debating trade and have hit a dead end.
>
> No Marc, you're still wriggling on the hook.

Nope. I've asked for certain concessions, and you both wiggled away.

>
> >> ï¿½One is less believable and more mentally incompetent than
> >> the other.
> > ..says the man with a paranoid and narcissistic
> > personality disorder.
>
> Yet another clear sign of delusional behavior - thinking that Marc is a
> qualified mental health professional.

I've admitted that I'm not a qualified mental health professional.
But I've had one confirm my suspicions about you already.

>
> > ï¿½If you were a man, you'd tell them to buzz off.
> > Why?
>
> Asked and answered.

Not answered.

>
> > ï¿½I suspect you're
> >> under so much stress that you can't see that.
> > Again, what is this stress you keep mentioning?
>
> The stress that explains your self-destructive behavior, Marc.

Self -destructive? Really? Provide evidence of that.

>
> BTW Marc, lets see if you can answer a few simple questions, or if you are
> too paranoid and delusional for that.
>
> How many times have you been married?

Twice.

>
> How many times have you been divorced?

Once.

>
> How many children have your genes?

Two.

Now it's my turn:

Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's genitalia and
the genetalia of an adult?

Why were you posting on RAO the day of your son's funeral?

Why did you post explicit descriptions of necrophilia and incest on an
audio newsgroup?

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 15th 08, 09:50 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

Marc is apparently obsessed with baby sex even though he can't spell the
words right:

> Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's
> genitalia and the genetalia of an adult?

But I can tell the difference. Genitalia and Genetalia are obviously spelled
differently.

Marc, why are you getting so excited that you can't even spell common words
properly? Don't you have anything else to share but your obsession with baby
sex?

> Why did you post explicit descriptions of necrophilia and
> incest on an audio newsgroup?

You mean when I quoted those posts that were originally posted by the
Middiot and Devil? I did that to refresh their memories, as they are both
very forgetful. Of course I'd be forgetful if I were them, given all of the
horrific things they have done on RAO.

Marc, why don't you ask that question of the OPs?

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 15th 08, 10:26 PM

On Dec 15, 1:35*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 7:48?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 15, 7:36?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> On Dec 15, 7:27?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>> On Dec 15, 7:11?am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 15, 4:10?am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We are a legitimate business dealing with
> >>>>>>>>>>> legitimate customers.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> An assertion weakened by your presence in said
> >>>>>>>>>> alleged business.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We ?are not going to send marketing information
> >>>>>>>>>>> to anonymous people on the ?Internet who
> >>>>>>>>>>> obviously have an ax to grind.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Why not?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Got something to hide?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> You need to provide comparable information to TAS
> >>>>>>>>>> if you are going to assert that you compete with
> >>>>>>>>>> them.
>
> >>>>>>>>> We have nothing to hide. ?TAS has the information.
>
> >>>>>>>>> If you follow the proper business protocols, you
> >>>>>>>>> can have it too.
>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks for contradicting yourself Marc. In another
> >>>>>>>> post you said that there was no way I could have
> >>>>>>>> it.
>
> >>>>>>>> So which post is true and which post is a lie?
> >>>>>>> Both are true. ?You are not a viable business
> >>>>>>> entity, and
> >>>>>>> therefore you cannot follow the proper business
> >>>>>>> protocols.
>
> >>>>>> Delusions of omniscience noted. Please provide a
> >>>>>> complete list of the business entities that I have
> >>>>>> significant influence or leadership in, and state why
> >>>>>> each one is not a viable Business entity. Otherwise,
> >>>>>> you are exposed yet again as a liar.
>
> >>>>> It's not a delusion but a business decision. ?I've
> >>>>> known you for 10 years. ?I know that you are not a
> >>>>> prospective advertiser.
>
> >>>>>>>>> It's not my place to splash it all over the
>
> >>>>>>>>> Internet. I'm not going to jeopardize my job by
> >>>>>>>>> responding to a couple of guys who have lied about
> >>>>>>>>> my personal life.
> >>>>>>>> Marc, why are you so stuffy about people who lie
> >>>>>>>> about people's personal life, given the hundreds of
> >>>>>>>> lies you've told about me?
> >>>>>>> I haven't lied about you.
>
> >>>>>> You do it again:
>
> >>>>>> ?Do you really want to talk about your pedophilia on
> >>>>>> Usenet again?
> >>>>>> Marc, why do you keep lying - are your paranoid
> >>>>>> delusions *that* strong?
> >>>>> Prove that I'm lying.
>
> >>>> You just did.
>
> >>>> You called me a pedophile and then in another nearly
> >>>> concurrent post admitted that you know that the MSP
> >>>> said that the "Dead Nate" email did not contain kiddie
> >>>> porn.
>
> >>> Wrong. ?I did not say that.
>
> >> Sure you did Marc, but if I show you, you'll lie about
> >> that too.
>
> >>>> I'm sticking a fork into you Marc, you're all done.
> >>>> Your own words condemn you.
>
> >>>> BTW, have a nice day, and thanks for playing. ;-)
>
> >>> So you're running away from me again? ?That sounds like
> >>> someone who just had his ass kicked.
>
> >> Run and hide?
>
> >> Marc, I just circled around back and kicked your butt 3
> >> more times. I am getting tired of kicking your butt, and
> >> I do have moral reservations about kicking you again
> >> when you are this far down.-
>
> > No, you didn't.
>
> Marc, I must again take note of your delusions of being able to reading my
> mind.
>
> > *So far you have yet to prove your
> > libelous claims about my family.
>
> I've made no claims about your family, Marc. I have pointed out a number of
> troubling situations relating to your sweet self.
>
> So Marc, that would be at least your third lie for the day, still before
> noon Eastern time.
>
> > *And you're trying to
> > convince us that mistaking a naked 18-year-old for a
> > naked infant is perfectly reasonable.
>
> The MSP officer thought so.
>
> > So tell me again how you're kicking my ass.
>
> Letsee Marc, there's all of your lying - clearly you are under stress. Then
> there's the fact that you've got the Middiot and ****R back, fighting your
> battles for you. One is less believable and more mentally incompetent than
> the other. If you were a man, you'd tell them to buzz off. I suspect you're
> under so much stress that you can't see that.

And here I thought you had at least a fundamental grasp of logic.

If you were a man you'd admit that you don't. As it is, I'll have to
admit that I was wrong: GOIA has lost even his tenuous grasp of
reality.

(I can't wait to see how Childborg manipulates that.) LOL!

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 15th 08, 10:27 PM

On Dec 15, 11:05*am, George M. Middius >
wrote:
> Shhhh! said:
>
> > > In your way Syphlistic, you are a good match for Marc.
> > I think sugar is your sockpuppet, GOIA. You both make up names that
> > twist handles or email addresses like "baboon", "arty-farty-guy"
> > "****R" and "Syphlistic".
>
> Is there trouble in Borgadise? Has Mr. **** alienated yet another
> Kroopologist?
>
> It's such a chore keeping the Resistance's files up to date since the
> Krooborg started going to chruch™ regularly.

I wonder what's causing him to feel guilty.

Sophistic

December 15th 08, 11:21 PM

John wrote:

> Clyde Slick wrote:

> > I have no indication that you served in the army, or, that if you did, you
> > were an officer.

> The bigger point is who cares whether you believe me or not? I don't.

So, you're a career US Army officer in Fort Drum, NY, eh John?
Is it now Brigade 53 or still Battalion 53?

Clyde Slick

December 15th 08, 11:45 PM

On 15 Dec, 10:26, Boon > wrote:
> On Dec 15, 7:21 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Sophistic" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > > BaBoon howled:
>
> > >>>>>> You haven't offered one shred of proof
>
> > >>>> I've offered plenty of proof.
>
> > >>> You're arguing with yourself there, you know.
>
> > >>> BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!!
>
> > >> I've made the offer. You've run away from it.
>
> > > You've made a public claim that you refuse to publicly
> > > substantiate.
>
> > Right. And, then Marc lies about whether he'll distribute the information
> > privately.
>
> I didn't lie about whether or not I'll distribute the information
> privately. *The information gets distributed privately every day.
>
>
>
> > > No transparently hollow, face-saving deflective ploy is
> > > going to alter that.
>
> > As usual Marc is his worst own enemy.
>
> Blah blah blah.
>
>
>
> > > And you further compound it by calling into question
> > > whatever credibility you may have once had.
>
> > Marc is trying hard to have even less credibility than the Middiot.
>
> I notice you didn't mention yourself. *I remember when you said the
> kiddy porn had infants in it, yet the MSP said the subjects were most
> likely over the age of 18. *Is that what you mean by "less credibility
> than the Middiot?"
>
> Boon-
Cut Krooger some slack.
His family must have some 18 year old infants.

Clyde Slick

December 15th 08, 11:50 PM

On 15 Dec, 18:21, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> John wrote:
> > Clyde Slick wrote:
> > > I have no indication that you served in the army, or, that if you did, you
> > > were an officer.
> > The bigger point is who cares whether you believe me or not? I don't.
>
> So, you're a career US Army officer in Fort Drum, NY, eh John?
> Is it now Brigade 53 or still Battalion 53?

In your case, its more like Car 54 Where Are You?

Boon

December 16th 08, 12:20 AM

On Dec 15, 1:50ï¿½pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> Marc is apparently obsessed with baby sex even though he can't spell the
> words right:
>
> > Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's
> > genitalia and the genitalia of an adult?
>
> But I can tell the difference. Genitalia and Genetalia are obviously spelled
> differently.

Wow! You're off the hook! You no longer have to explain why you lied
about the child pornography images in your hard drive because an
unrelated stranger on the Internet made a typo.

Let's try it again:

Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's genitalia and
the genitalia of an adult?

>
> Marc, why are you getting so excited that you can't even spell common words
> properly? Don't you have anything else to share but your obsession with baby
> sex?

That would be bearing false witness against thy neighbor. I think
Pastor Matt needs to know that a member of his congregation is
accusing strangers on the Internet of having an "obsession with baby
sex." I think that would be enough for him to ask you not to come to
church anymore.

>
> > Why did you post explicit descriptions of necrophilia and
> > incest on an ï¿½audio newsgroup?
>
> You mean when I quoted those posts that were originally posted by the
> Middiot and Devil?

No. I meant you posting that someone sent you an [forged] email, and
then repeating the descriptions on this group.

I did I did that to refresh their memories, as they are both
> very forgetful. Of course I'd be forgetful if I were them, given all of the
> horrific things they have done on RAO.

The most horrific thing they've done is to object to your presence
here.

>
> Marc, why don't you ask that question of the OPs?

Arny, why are you so ashamed of your own horrific actions that you've
blocked them from your memory?

Boon

Boon

December 16th 08, 12:24 AM

You forgot one, Arny:

Why were you posting on RAO the day of your son's funeral?

Why did you forget that one? Because no debating trade trick in the
book can make that right?

Boon

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 16th 08, 12:24 AM

On Dec 15, 5:21*pm, "Sophistic" > wrote:
> John wrote:
> > Clyde Slick wrote:
> > > I have no indication that you served in the army, or, that if you did, you
> > > were an officer.
> > The bigger point is who cares whether you believe me or not? I don't.
>
> So, you're a career US Army officer in Fort Drum, NY, eh John?

Huh? That nails it: You're as crazy as GOIA is. I've been there
before, but not in almost 20 years.

> Is it now Brigade 53 or still Battalion 53?

Um, normally you'd have something like 1st or 2nd brigade, and so on.
Here, sugar, since you're so hopelessly lost:

*******************
Battalion (or Cavalry Squadron): Normally composed of two to five
(occasionally as many as eight) companies, troops or batteries and led
by a Battalion/Squadron Commander, usually a Lieutenant Colonel
supported by a staff in a Headquarters and Headquarters Company/
Battery. 300-1000 soldiers.

Brigade (or group): Composed of two or more battalions, and usually
commanded by a Colonel, supported by a staff in a Headquarters and
Headquarters Company. Since the Brigade Unit of Action program was
initiated, maneuver brigades have transformed into brigade combat
teams, generally consisting of two maneuver battalions, a cavalry
squadron, a fires battalion, a special troops battalion (with
engineers, signals, and military intelligence), and a support
battalion. Stryker Brigade Combat Teams have a somewhat larger
structure. 3,000-5,000 soldiers.

(i.e. since the Army has undergone transformation, the "unit of
action" referred to here is called a "Brigade Combat Team", as in
"1BCT or "3BCT". Supporting elements which were under the command and
control of their branches are now intrinsic in the BCT. Typically a
Division Artillery would support a brigade under the old structure
with a battalion of artillery, for example. That FA battalion
commander would act as the Fire Support Officer on the Brigade's
staff. Ditto Chemical and Engineer. Now those assets are prepackaged
into and controlled by BCTs. Normally commanded by a full colonel.)

Regiment: The Army, for the most part is no longer organized by
Regiments. Rather, Battalions and Squadrons maintain Regimental
Affiliations in that they are called (for example), 1st Battalion, 8th
Infantry (Regiment is implied) and is written 1-8 Inf. In this case,
there is no Regimental Commander and the Battalion is organized as
part of a Brigade for combat. The exceptions are those units, such as
Armored Cavalry Regiments which remain organized, and fight, as a
Regiment and have a Regimental Commander. The written designation is
easy to distinguish and commonly misused. A "/" separates levels of
command. 1st Squadron, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment is written 1/3 ACR
whereas the 1st Battalion, 6th Field Artillery (again, Regiment is
implied) is written 1-6 FA.
*************************
So as we can see, sugar, "53 Battalion" or "53 Brigade" makes no sense
(the number will always precede the unit type, BTW) unless other
identification is included. "53 AVN BDE" or "1-53 AVN" might make
sense.

Anyway, sugar, feel free to peruse the Ft. Drum, NY tenant list if
you're curious about which units are currently assigned there:

http://www.drum.army.mil/sites/tenants/

In the meantime you get to join 2pid on the slagheap of "military
intelligence". LOL!

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 16th 08, 12:27 AM

On Dec 15, 3:50*pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> Marc is apparently obsessed with baby sex even though he can't spell the
> words right:
>
> > Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's
> > genitalia and the genetalia of an adult?
>
> But I can tell the difference. Genitalia and Genetalia are obviously spelled
> differently.

Ah! Score 1/2 "debating trade" point for GOIA! He gets a "gotcha"
spelling point"!

The score is now Boon 1,682, GOIA 1/2.

Say, GOIA, now that you've started this "rebuking" business, will you
be able to cast out your demons?

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 16th 08, 12:28 AM

On Dec 15, 6:24*pm, Boon > wrote:
> You forgot one, Arny:
>
> Why were you posting on RAO the day of your son's funeral?
>
> Why did you forget that one? *Because no debating trade trick in the
> book can make that right?

He can't help himself. His illness demands it of him.

Boon

December 16th 08, 12:30 AM

On Dec 15, 4:27ï¿½pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 3:50ï¿½pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > Marc is apparently obsessed with baby sex even though he can't spell the
> > words right:
>
> > > Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's
> > > genitalia and the genetalia of an adult?
>
> > But I can tell the difference. Genitalia and Genetalia are obviously spelled
> > differently.
>
> Ah! Score 1/2 "debating trade" point for GOIA! He gets a "gotcha"
> spelling point"!
>
> The score is now Boon 1,682, GOIA 1/2.
>
> Say, GOIA, now that you've started this "rebuking" business, will you
> be able to cast out your demons?

The truth is, I've been making a lot of typos lately. It's deadline
at the magazine and I can't see straight.

So yeah, Arny can have 1/2 point.

Boon

Boon

December 16th 08, 12:30 AM

On Dec 15, 4:28ï¿½pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 6:24ï¿½pm, Boon > wrote:
>
> > You forgot one, Arny:
>
> > Why were you posting on RAO the day of your son's funeral?
>
> > Why did you forget that one? ï¿½Because no debating trade trick in the
> > book can make that right?
>
> He can't help himself. His illness demands it of him.

Agreed.

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 16th 08, 09:34 AM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> The most horrific thing they've done is to object to your
> presence here.

Marc, you are really some kind of idiot, aren't you.

I have to admit that the HTML audio forums are kind of intoxicating - there
are actually audiophiles there, not lowlife sleezeballs who fantasize about
infant genitelia, like you.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 16th 08, 12:37 PM

On Dec 16, 3:34*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > The most horrific thing they've done is to object to your
> > presence here.
>
> Marc, you are really some kind of idiot, aren't you.
>
> I have to admit that the HTML audio forums are kind of intoxicating - there
> are actually audiophiles there, not lowlife sleezeballs who fantasize about
> infant genitelia, like you.

But you invariably slink back in, GOIA. Now what do you suppose that
says about you? LOL!

Boon

December 16th 08, 02:32 PM

On Dec 16, 1:34ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > The most horrific thing they've done is to object to your
> > presence here.
>
> Marc, you are really some kind of idiot, aren't you.
>
> I have to admit that the HTML audio forums are kind of intoxicating - there
> are actually audiophiles there, not lowlife sleezeballs who fantasize about
> infant genitelia, like you.

Why do you keep bringing infant genitalia into the conversation? Why
do you keep insisting that others have an obsession with it? You know
that's the sign of a paranoid personality disorder, don't you? Why
aren't you getting help?

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 16th 08, 02:37 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 16, 1:34?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> The most horrific thing they've done is to object to
>>> your presence here.
>>
>> Marc, you are really some kind of idiot, aren't you.
>>
>> I have to admit that the HTML audio forums are kind of
>> intoxicating - there are actually audiophiles there, not
>> lowlife sleezeballs who fantasize about infant
>> genitelia, like you.
>
> Why do you keep bringing infant genitalia into the
> conversation?

Wrong Marc, I described the situation in non-specific terms.

That's your second lie of 12-16-2008, and it still isn't noon.

Arny Krueger

December 16th 08, 02:42 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> Now it's my turn:
>
> Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's
> genitalia and the genetalia of an adult?

Boon

December 16th 08, 02:45 PM

On Dec 16, 6:37ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 16, 1:34?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> The most horrific thing they've done is to object to
> >>> your presence here.
>
> >> Marc, you are really some kind of idiot, aren't you.
>
> >> I have to admit that the HTML audio forums are kind of
> >> intoxicating - there are actually audiophiles there, not
> >> lowlife sleezeballs who fantasize about infant
> >> genitelia, like you.
>
> > Why do you keep bringing infant genitalia into the
> > conversation?
>
> Wrong Marc, I described the situation in non-specific terms.
>
> That's your second lie of 12-16-2008, and it still isn't noon.

Bull****.

You described the picture as containing infants. Later you said the
MSP determined they probably weren't minors. In a court of law that's
referred to as "having your credibility destroyed."

But let's ask Pastor Matt what he thinks. Shall we?

Boon

Boon

December 16th 08, 02:45 PM

On Dec 16, 6:42ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
> > Now it's my turn:
>
> > Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's
> > genitalia and ï¿½the genetalia of an adult?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Gee, Arny...I have you so stressed out that you can't even post
anything!

LOL!

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 16th 08, 02:49 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 16, 6:37?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 16, 1:34?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> The most horrific thing they've done is to object to
>>>>> your presence here.
>>
>>>> Marc, you are really some kind of idiot, aren't you.
>>
>>>> I have to admit that the HTML audio forums are kind of
>>>> intoxicating - there are actually audiophiles there,
>>>> not lowlife sleezeballs who fantasize about infant
>>>> genitelia, like you.
>>
>>> Why do you keep bringing infant genitalia into the
>>> conversation?
>>
>> Wrong Marc, I described the situation in non-specific
>> terms.

>> That's your second lie of 12-16-2008, and it still isn't
>> noon.

> Bull****.

Truth. I just highlighted the post where you did that yesterday, and you've
already fallen for it.

> You described the picture as containing infants.

That all happened many years ago Marc. I had pretty well forgotten about it
until you just brought it up. You see Marc, unlike you, I'm not obsessing
over crap like this.

> Later you said the MSP determined they probably weren't minors.

That's because they said it much later. Years later.

> In a court of law that's referred to as "having your
> credibility destroyed."

Wrong again, Marc. That's called being willing to admit that you were
corrected by a higher authority.

> But let's ask Pastor Matt what he thinks. Shall we?

Marc, why are you so obsessed with this crap? You're just making yourself
look like a fool.

Arny Krueger

December 16th 08, 02:51 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 16, 6:42?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Now it's my turn:
>>
>>> Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's
>>> genitalia and ?the genetalia of an adult?- Hide quoted
>>> text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Gee, Arny...I have you so stressed out that you can't
> even post anything!
>
> LOL!

Inability to read the title line, noted.

Gotcha again, Marc.

Marc if you want to get into posting wars, try playing with someone about
your speed - there has got to be a carrot patch someplace for you to play
in!

Boon

December 16th 08, 02:58 PM

On Dec 16, 6:49ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 16, 6:37?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 16, 1:34?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> The most horrific thing they've done is to object to
> >>>>> your presence here.
>
> >>>> Marc, you are really some kind of idiot, aren't you.
>
> >>>> I have to admit that the HTML audio forums are kind of
> >>>> intoxicating - there are actually audiophiles there,
> >>>> not lowlife sleezeballs who fantasize about infant
> >>>> genitelia, like you.
>
> >>> Why do you keep bringing infant genitalia into the
> >>> conversation?
>
> >> Wrong Marc, I described the situation in non-specific
> >> terms.
> >> That's your second lie of 12-16-2008, and it still isn't
> >> noon.
> > Bull****.
>
> Truth. I just highlighted the post where you did that yesterday, and you've
> already fallen for it.

But look below! You're about to prove yourself wrong!

>
> > You described the picture as containing infants.
>
> That all happened many years ago Marc.

There you go!

I had pretty well forgotten about it
> until you just brought it up. You see Marc, unlike you, I'm not obsessing
> over crap like this.

You've forgotten that someone sent you child pornography and that you
had it stored in your computer for three years? Really? That's the
story you're going with?

If someone had sent child pornography to me, I'd be haunted and
sickened by the images for the rest of my life. (Just like I'm
sickened by your descriptions of it here.) It's not surprising that
you've conveniently forgotten it. It probably didn't make much of an
impression on you. You've probably seen much worse.

>
> > Later you said the MSP determined they probably weren't minors.
>
> That's because they said it much later. Years later.

What, they called you up years after you originally showed them? It
took years for them to make a decision? That's the only way your
statement makes sense.

>
> > In a court of law that's referred to as "having your
> > credibility destroyed."
>
> Wrong again, Marc. That's called being willing to admit that you were
> corrected by a higher authority.

So the Michigan State Police are more qualified to tell the difference
between an infant and an 18-year-old than you are? Really? Do you
think that's part of their training?

>
> > But let's ask Pastor Matt what he thinks. ï¿½Shall we?
>
> Marc, why are you so obsessed with this crap? ï¿½You're just making yourself
> look like a fool.-

You think asking your spiritual leader to decide what is right and
wrong is crap? That certainly doesn't say much for Pastor Matt. How
does he feel about the fact that your posted on RAO on the day of your
son's funeral? What's that? He doesn't know? Why, are you ashamed
of yourself?

Boon

Clyde Slick

December 16th 08, 03:03 PM

On 16 Dec, 09:51, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 16, 6:42?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> Now it's my turn:
>
> >>> Why can't you tell the difference between an infant's
> >>> genitalia and ?the genetalia of an adult?- Hide quoted
> >>> text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Gee, Arny...I have you so stressed out that you can't
> > even post anything!
>
> > LOL!
>
> Inability to read the title line, noted.
>
> Gotcha again, Marc.
>
> Marc if you want to get into posting wars, try playing with someone about
> your speed - there has *got to be a carrot patch someplace for you to play
> in!-

You ignorant pile of ****, you are the one who first polluted
RAO with KP garbage.

Arny Krueger

December 16th 08, 03:05 PM

"Clyde Slick" > wrote in message

> You ignorant pile of ****,

Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost every time you post.

Boon

December 16th 08, 03:11 PM

On Dec 16, 7:05ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost every time you post.

Has Art received child pornography and then proceeded to describe the
images to an audio newsgroup? No, that was you. You're the one who
has polluted this newsgroup with your sickness and your behavioral
disorders.

I'm still waiting for the OK to contact Pastor Matt.

Boon

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 17th 08, 01:34 AM

On Dec 16, 9:05*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost every time you post.

Isn't it funny, GOIA?

I've made more recent on-topic posts here than you have.

Clyde Slick

December 17th 08, 02:24 AM

On 16 Dec, 10:05, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost every time you post.

I don't pollute the Middiot, whomever that might be.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 17th 08, 08:06 AM

On Dec 16, 8:24*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 16 Dec, 10:05, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > > You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> > Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost every time you post..
>
> I don't pollute the Middiot, whomever that might be.

AHA! So you ADMIT that George is a sockpuppet!

Clyde Slick

December 17th 08, 03:01 PM

On 17 Dec, 03:06, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> wrote:
> On Dec 16, 8:24*pm, Clyde Slick > wrote:
>
> > On 16 Dec, 10:05, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
> > > "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
> >
>
> > > > You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> > > Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost every time you post.
>
> > I don't pollute the Middiot, whomever that might be.
>
> AHA! So you ADMIT that George is a sockpuppet!

You are confused
George is "Middius".

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 18th 08, 08:51 AM

"Arny Krueger"

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 18th 08, 08:53 AM

On Dec 16, 9:05*am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost every time you post.

And I've posted on-topic more receently than you have, GOIA.

Funny, huh? LOL!

Arny Krueger

December 18th 08, 12:33 PM

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
wrote in message

> On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>>
>> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost
>> every time you post.
>
> And I've posted on-topic more receently than you have,
> my master and commander.

Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on any number of other Usenet
audio/video groups and 3 HTML-based audio forums while you have been
steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on RAO. RAO is your world,
RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some spare moments.

Clyde Slick

December 18th 08, 01:04 PM

On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> wrote in
>
> > On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> >> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost
> >> every time you post.
>
> > And I've posted on-topic more receently than you have,
> > my master and commander.
>
> Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on any number of other Usenet
> audio/video groups and 3 HTML-based audio forums while you have been
> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on RAO. *RAO is your world,
> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some spare moments.

something like 12,000+ posts

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

December 18th 08, 01:23 PM

On Dec 18, 6:33 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >

> > And I've posted on-topic more receently than you have,
> > GOIA.
>
> Nah, you God-like man you,

True. You said you wanted truth. Go find your last on-topic post on
RAO.

> I've been steadily posting on-topic on any number of other Usenet
> audio/video groups and 3 HTML-based audio forums while you have been
> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on RAO.

Who cares? You whine about here, GOIA. You keep coming back and
whining about RAO. Poor GOIA!

> RAO is your world,

Correction: my kingdom, serf.

> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some spare moments.

It seems that you have more many spare moments than not, GOIA. LOL!

samvaknin[_2_]

December 18th 08, 02:49 PM

Hi,

Cyber Narcissist

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/journal67.html

For a more detailed view of pathological narcissism and the
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) - click on these links:

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/npdglance.html

http://samvak.tripod.com/personalitydisorders12.html

http://samvak.tripod.com/personalitydisorders13.html

http://samvak.tripod.com/personalitydisorders14.html

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/narcissismglance.html

Other Personality Disorders

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faqpd.html

Pathological Narcissism diagnosed with Other Mental Health Disorders

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq82.html

NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder) and AsPD (Antisocial
Personality Disorder, Psychopathy, or Sociopathy)

http://samvak.tripod.com/personalitydisorders16.html

http://samvak.tripod.com/personalitydisorders15.html

Sam

Boon

December 18th 08, 03:03 PM

On Dec 18, 5:04ï¿½am, Clyde Slick > wrote:
> On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" >
> > wrote in
>
> > > On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > > wrote:
> > >> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in message
>
> >
>
> > >>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> > >> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost
> > >> every time you post.
>
> > > And I've posted on-topic more receently than you have,
> > > my master and commander.
>
> > Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on any number of other Usenet
> > audio/video groups and 3 HTML-based audio forums while you have been
> > steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on RAO. ï¿½RAO is your world,
> > RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some spare moments.
>
> something like 12,000+ posts-

A lot more than that. Arny's been busy removing hundreds, if not
thousands, of his posts from the archives. I think Pastor Matt told
him to do it.

Boon

George M. Middius[_4_]

December 18th 08, 04:41 PM

Boon said:

> Arny's been busy removing hundreds, if not thousands, of his posts
> from the archives. I think Pastor Matt told him to do it.

Something or somebody may have instigated the cleanup. Something other
than Krooger's conscience, that is. Krooger snuffed it out many years ago.

Arny Krueger

December 18th 08, 06:53 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 18, 5:04?am, Clyde Slick >
> wrote:
>> On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>>> >
>>> wrote in
>>>
>>
>>>> On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
>>>>> message
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>>
>>>>> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost
>>>>> every time you post.
>>
>>>> And I've posted on-topic more receently than you have,
>>>> my master and commander.
>>
>>> Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on any
>>> number of other Usenet audio/video groups and 3
>>> HTML-based audio forums while you have been
>>> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on
>>> RAO. ?RAO is your world,
>>> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some spare
>>> moments.
>>
>> something like 12,000+ posts-
>
> A lot more than that. Arny's been busy removing
> hundreds, if not
> thousands, of his posts from the archives. I think
> Pastor Matt told
> him to do it.

Two lies, right there, but its after noon in the eastern time zone. Marc
must be slowing down.

Boon

December 18th 08, 07:37 PM

On Dec 18, 10:53ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 5:04?am, Clyde Slick >
> > wrote:
> >> On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" >
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> >>> >
> >>> wrote in
> >>>
>
> >>>> On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>>> message
>
>
>
> >>>>>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> >>>>> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost
> >>>>> every time you post.
>
> >>>> And I've posted on-topic more receently than you have,
> >>>> my master and commander.
>
> >>> Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on any
> >>> number of other Usenet audio/video groups and 3
> >>> HTML-based audio forums while you have been
> >>> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on
> >>> RAO. ?RAO is your world,
> >>> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some spare
> >>> moments.
>
> >> something like 12,000+ posts-
>
> > A lot more than that. ï¿½Arny's been busy removing
> > hundreds, if not
> > thousands, of his posts from the archives. ï¿½I think
> > Pastor Matt told
> > him to do it.
>
> Two lies, right there, but its after noon in the eastern time zone. Marc
> must be slowing down.-

You have never once proven that I've lied. Not one single time.

Boon

Arny Krueger

December 18th 08, 07:54 PM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 18, 10:53?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 18, 5:04?am, Clyde Slick
>>> > wrote:
>>>> On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" >
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>
>>
>>>>>> On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
>>>>>>> message
>>
>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>>
>>>>>>> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost
>>>>>>> every time you post.
>>
>>>>>> And I've posted on-topic more receently than you
>>>>>> have, my master and commander.
>>
>>>>> Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on any
>>>>> number of other Usenet audio/video groups and 3
>>>>> HTML-based audio forums while you have been
>>>>> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on
>>>>> RAO. ?RAO is your world,
>>>>> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some
>>>>> spare moments.
>>
>>>> something like 12,000+ posts-
>>
>>> A lot more than that. ?Arny's been busy removing
>>> hundreds, if not
>>> thousands, of his posts from the archives. ?I think
>>> Pastor Matt told
>>> him to do it.

>> Two lies, right there, but its after noon in the eastern
>> time zone. Marc must be slowing down.-

> You have never once proven that I've lied.

Two of them, right above. Prove that I've removed even one post of mine from
the archives. Just one post.

> Not one single time.

Whatever you have to tell yourself to buoy your sinking self-respect, Marc.

Boon

December 18th 08, 09:13 PM

On Dec 18, 11:54ï¿½am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 10:53?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 18, 5:04?am, Clyde Slick
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>> On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> wrote in
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>>> On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>>>>> message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> >>>>>>> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost
> >>>>>>> every time you post.
>
> >>>>>> And I've posted on-topic more receently than you
> >>>>>> have, my master and commander.
>
> >>>>> Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on any
> >>>>> number of other Usenet audio/video groups and 3
> >>>>> HTML-based audio forums while you have been
> >>>>> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on
> >>>>> RAO. ?RAO is your world,
> >>>>> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some
> >>>>> spare moments.
>
> >>>> something like 12,000+ posts-
>
> >>> A lot more than that. ?Arny's been busy removing
> >>> hundreds, if not
> >>> thousands, of his posts from the archives. ?I think
> >>> Pastor Matt told
> >>> him to do it.
> >> Two lies, right there, but its after noon in the eastern
> >> time zone. Marc must be slowing down.-
> > You have never once proven that I've lied.
>
> Two of them, right above. Prove that I've removed even one post of mine from
> the archives. Just one post.

What happened to all of the KP posts?

>
> > ï¿½Not one ï¿½single time.
>
> Whatever you have to tell yourself to buoy your sinking self-respect, Marc.

Nonsense. I smell your blood in the water.

Boon

Clyde Slick

December 18th 08, 09:53 PM

On 18 Dec, 16:13, Boon > wrote:
> On Dec 18, 11:54 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> > > On Dec 18, 10:53?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > > wrote:
> > >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
> >
>
> > >>> On Dec 18, 5:04?am, Clyde Slick
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>>> On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" >
> > >>>> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> wrote in
> > >>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> > >>>>>>> message
>
> >
>
> > >>>>>>>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> > >>>>>>> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place almost
> > >>>>>>> every time you post.
>
> > >>>>>> And I've posted on-topic more receently than you
> > >>>>>> have, my master and commander.
>
> > >>>>> Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on any
> > >>>>> number of other Usenet audio/video groups and 3
> > >>>>> HTML-based audio forums while you have been
> > >>>>> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on
> > >>>>> RAO. ?RAO is your world,
> > >>>>> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some
> > >>>>> spare moments.
>
> > >>>> something like 12,000+ posts-
>
> > >>> A lot more than that. ?Arny's been busy removing
> > >>> hundreds, if not
> > >>> thousands, of his posts from the archives. ?I think
> > >>> Pastor Matt told
> > >>> him to do it.
> > >> Two lies, right there, but its after noon in the eastern
> > >> time zone. Marc must be slowing down.-
> > > You have never once proven that I've lied.
>
> > Two of them, right above. Prove that I've removed even one post of mine from
> > the archives. Just one post.
>
> What happened to all of the KP posts?
>
>
>
> > > Not one single time.
>
> > Whatever you have to tell yourself to buoy your sinking self-respect, Marc.
>
> Nonsense. *I smell your blood in the water.
>

Wrong, that's his wet willie you smell.

December 19th 08, 02:37 AM

"Boon" > wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 11:54?am, "Arny Krueger" >
wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 10:53?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 18, 5:04?am, Clyde Slick
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>> On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> wrote in
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>>> On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>>>>> message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> >>>>>>> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place
> >>>>>>> almost
> >>>>>>> every time you post.
>
> >>>>>> And I've posted on-topic more receently than you
> >>>>>> have, my master and commander.
>
> >>>>> Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on
> >>>>> any
> >>>>> number of other Usenet audio/video groups and 3
> >>>>> HTML-based audio forums while you have been
> >>>>> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on
> >>>>> RAO. ?RAO is your world,
> >>>>> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some
> >>>>> spare moments.
>
> >>>> something like 12,000+ posts-
>
> >>> A lot more than that. ?Arny's been busy removing
> >>> hundreds, if not
> >>> thousands, of his posts from the archives. ?I think
> >>> Pastor Matt told
> >>> him to do it.
> >> Two lies, right there, but its after noon in the
> >> eastern
> >> time zone. Marc must be slowing down.-
> > You have never once proven that I've lied.
>
> Two of them, right above. Prove that I've removed even one
> post of mine from
> the archives. Just one post.

What happened to all of the KP posts?

>
> > ?Not one ?single time.
>
> Whatever you have to tell yourself to buoy your sinking
> self-respect, Marc.

Nonsense. I smell your blood in the water.

Boon

I have called him on this before. I even saved the post to
my HD before I confronted him on it and he had the
opportunity to remove it. It is called being one step ahead
of the game ;-)

The post in question was a vitriolic diatribe at a poster on
aus.hi-fi called Ruff and Arny thought he was talking
(abusing) to me.

I have asked Arny's permission to contact his ISP and have
the records searched on the specific date he deleted it
but - you guessed it - AK won't forwarded the permission ;-)

So without his ISP's co-operation there is no hard proof
only a 99.9999999999% chance that Arny did remove the post
and then lied about it.

So near enough in my book! A proven liar!

Cheers TT

Clyde Slick

December 19th 08, 02:44 AM

On 18 Dec, 21:37, "TT" > wrote:

>
> So without his ISP's co-operation there is no hard proof
> only a 99.9999999999% chance that Arny did remove the post
> and then lied about it.
>

Wow!
that's even higher than his feces content.

MiNe 109

December 19th 08, 02:58 AM

In article >,
George M. Middius > wrote:

> Boon said:
>
> > Arny's been busy removing hundreds, if not thousands, of his posts
> > from the archives. I think Pastor Matt told him to do it.
>
> Something or somebody may have instigated the cleanup. Something other
> than Krooger's conscience, that is. Krooger snuffed it out many years ago.

Maybe a chance hearing of Monty Python's "Decomposing Composers"
inspired him.

Stephen

Arny Krueger

December 19th 08, 03:08 AM

"Boon" > wrote in message

> On Dec 18, 11:54?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> wrote:
>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 18, 10:53?am, "Arny Krueger" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> On Dec 18, 5:04?am, Clyde Slick
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger"
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
>>>>>>>>> message
>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>>
>>>>>>>>> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place
>>>>>>>>> almost every time you post.
>>
>>>>>>>> And I've posted on-topic more receently than you
>>>>>>>> have, my master and commander.
>>
>>>>>>> Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on
>>>>>>> any number of other Usenet audio/video groups and 3
>>>>>>> HTML-based audio forums while you have been
>>>>>>> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on
>>>>>>> RAO. ?RAO is your world,
>>>>>>> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some
>>>>>>> spare moments.
>>
>>>>>> something like 12,000+ posts-
>>
>>>>> A lot more than that. ?Arny's been busy removing
>>>>> hundreds, if not
>>>>> thousands, of his posts from the archives. ?I think
>>>>> Pastor Matt told
>>>>> him to do it.
>>>> Two lies, right there, but its after noon in the
>>>> eastern time zone. Marc must be slowing down.-
>>> You have never once proven that I've lied.

>> Two of them, right above. Prove that I've removed even
>> one post of mine from the archives. Just one post.

> What happened to all of the KP posts?

Not my problem, not my doing.

Arny Krueger

December 19th 08, 03:10 AM

"TT" > wrote in message
. au

> I have called him on this before. I even saved the post
> to my HD before I confronted him on it and he had the
> opportunity to remove it. It is called being one step
> ahead of the game ;-)

Are you paranoid or what, Terry?

> The post in question was a vitriolic diatribe at a poster
> on aus.hi-fi called Ruff and Arny thought he was talking
> (abusing) to me.

> I have asked Arny's permission to contact his ISP and have
> the records searched on the specific date he deleted it
> but - you guessed it - AK won't forwarded the permission
> ;-)

Your obsessions over nothing aren't my problem, Terry.

> So without his ISP's co-operation there is no hard proof
> only a 99.9999999999% chance that Arny did remove the post
> and then lied about it.

Terry, you really need a life.

> So near enough in my book! A proven liar!

You have no idea about what reliable proof is, Terry.

Boon

December 19th 08, 03:20 AM

On Dec 18, 7:08ï¿½pm, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 11:54?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> > wrote:
> >> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>> On Dec 18, 10:53?am, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> "Boon" > wrote in message
>
>
>
> >>>>> On Dec 18, 5:04?am, Clyde Slick
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>> On 18 Dec, 07:33, "Arny Krueger" >
> >>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> wrote in
> >>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>> On Dec 16, 9:05 am, "Arny Krueger"
> >>>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> "Clyde Slick" > wrote in
> >>>>>>>>> message
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>> You ignorant pile of ****,
>
> >>>>>>>>> Art, like the Middiot you pollute this place
> >>>>>>>>> almost every time you post.
>
> >>>>>>>> And I've posted on-topic more receently than you
> >>>>>>>> have, my master and commander.
>
> >>>>>>> Nah ****R, I've been steadily posting on-topic on
> >>>>>>> any number of other Usenet audio/video groups and 3
> >>>>>>> HTML-based audio forums while you have been
> >>>>>>> steadily spewing forth your fear and hatred here on
> >>>>>>> RAO. ?RAO is your world,
> >>>>>>> RAO is a freak show I dabble with for fun in some
> >>>>>>> spare moments.
>
> >>>>>> something like 12,000+ posts-
>
> >>>>> A lot more than that. ?Arny's been busy removing
> >>>>> hundreds, if not
> >>>>> thousands, of his posts from the archives. ?I think
> >>>>> Pastor Matt told
> >>>>> him to do it.
> >>>> Two lies, right there, but its after noon in the
> >>>> eastern time zone. Marc must be slowing down.-
> >>> You have never once proven that I've lied.
> >> Two of them, right above. Prove that I've removed even
> >> one post of mine from the archives. Just one post.
> > What happened to all of the KP posts?
>
> Not my problem, not my doing.-

Liar.

Boon

December 19th 08, 03:46 AM

"Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
...
> "TT" > wrote in message
> . au
>
>> I have called him on this before. I even saved the post
>> to my HD before I confronted him on it and he had the
>> opportunity to remove it. It is called being one step
>> ahead of the game ;-)
>
> Are you paranoid or what, Terry?

But I was right, you did remove the post as soon as your
attention was drawn to the fact that you had screwed up -
AGAIN!

>
>> The post in question was a vitriolic diatribe at a poster
>> on aus.hi-fi called Ruff and Arny thought he was talking
>> (abusing) to me.
>
>> I have asked Arny's permission to contact his ISP and
>> have
>> the records searched on the specific date he deleted it
>> but - you guessed it - AK won't forwarded the permission
>> ;-)
>
> Your obsessions over nothing aren't my problem, Terry.

So your honesty and integrity is now nothing eh? OK I can
live with that.

>
>> So without his ISP's co-operation there is no hard proof
>> only a 99.9999999999% chance that Arny did remove the
>> post
>> and then lied about it.
>
> Terry, you really need a life.

I actually have a rather good life and at the moment my
diversion is making you squirm and to show the World what
you really are like!

>
>> So near enough in my book! A proven liar!
>
> You have no idea about what reliable proof is, Terry.

Alright then teach me. Here is my problem, at the moment I
have someone that I believe removed a post and then lied
about it. It is a dead set certainty that it happened but
this obtuse person wants 110% proof. So how do you propose
I do it without access to his ISP records?

TT

Arny Krueger

December 19th 08, 12:59 PM

"TT" > wrote in message
. au
> "Arny Krueger" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "TT" > wrote in message
>> . au
>>
>>> I have called him on this before. I even saved the post
>>> to my HD before I confronted him on it and he had the
>>> opportunity to remove it. It is called being one step
>>> ahead of the game ;-)
>>
>> Are you paranoid or what, Terry?
>
> But I was right, you did remove the post as soon as your
> attention was drawn to the fact that you had screwed up -
> AGAIN!

Never happened, except in your fevered little mind, Terry.

>>> The post in question was a vitriolic diatribe at a
>>> poster on aus.hi-fi called Ruff and Arny thought he was
>>> talking (abusing) to me.
>>
>>> I have asked Arny's permission to contact his ISP and
>>> have
>>> the records searched on the specific date he deleted it
>>> but - you guessed it - AK won't forwarded the permission
>>> ;-)
>>
>> Your obsessions over nothing aren't my problem, Terry.

> So your honesty and integrity is now nothing eh? OK I can
> live with that.

Terry, your head is so far into that well-known place of no sunshine that
it's hopeless.

>>> So without his ISP's co-operation there is no hard proof
>>> only a 99.9999999999% chance that Arny did remove the
>>> post
>>> and then lied about it.
>>
>> Terry, you really need a life.

> I actually have a rather good life and at the moment my
> diversion is making you squirm and to show the World what
> you really are like!

Terry, savior of the world.

Now, that's a scary thought!

>>> So near enough in my book! A proven liar!
>
>> You have no idea about what reliable proof is, Terry.

> Alright then teach me. Here is my problem, at the moment
> I have someone that I believe removed a post and then lied
> about it.

All or most of the posts on Google are also echoed on other sites. Places
like audiobanter.com Find the posts you seek on one of them.

> It is a dead set certainty that it happened but
> this obtuse person wants 110% proof. So how do you
> propose I do it without access to his ISP records?

Learn how to use google.