Don Pearce[_2_]
December 2nd 08, 12:58 PM
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 04:55:56 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
>On Dec 2, 7:40 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> A concurrent development was the LS3/5 studio monitor. It also used
>> equalization and specially designed drivers to sacrifice efficiency to
>> create a physically small loudspeaker with extended response.
>
>Contrary to popular belief, the Rogers LS3/5 used off-
>the-shelf KEF B110 and T27 drivers.
Not quite off-the-shelf as I heard it. The B110s were selected off the
line to get Fs within +/- 5Hz.
d
wrote:
>On Dec 2, 7:40 am, "Arny Krueger" > wrote:
>> A concurrent development was the LS3/5 studio monitor. It also used
>> equalization and specially designed drivers to sacrifice efficiency to
>> create a physically small loudspeaker with extended response.
>
>Contrary to popular belief, the Rogers LS3/5 used off-
>the-shelf KEF B110 and T27 drivers.
Not quite off-the-shelf as I heard it. The B110s were selected off the
line to get Fs within +/- 5Hz.
d